RE: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11.11

[Gibson, Danny]

Hi Ya( Dale/Wendy),

Yes I am using the GNU tools.  I also have my PATH set to call
/usr/local/bin first where all the GNU tools reside.  I also created a
JK_DIR environment setting prior to running the configure script.  Configure
seems to run fine, as does the common Makefile.  It just dies at the
apache13 Makefile.  I also tried using the mod-jk.so which resides under the
/opt/hpws/tomcat/jk/apache2 but it must not be a correct version to be
loaded under apache1.3.33 as I get /usr/lib/dld.sl: Unresolved symbol:
errors when Apache tries to load it.  It appears that the hpws is Apache 2
which was loaded during the build, but I am not using it as I have multiple
v-tiers which need their own separate Apache installs.

When I run the configure script I am using the following command:

./configure --with-apxs=/opt/app/darw1/apache1.3.33/bin/apxs

I have JAVA_HOME set as well.

I compiled Apache 1.3.33 from source with no compiler or make issues.  It's
just this JK connector build I am having extreme trouble with...

I may have to remove the Apache 2 and try installing an HP-UX depot of
Apache 1.3 in hopes I can get the mod_jk.so library file.

I was just hoping someone already had it compiled to save me the time of
removing the Apache 2 and installing the Apache 1.3

Anyway, I am open to any suggestions.

Danny


-Original Message-
From: Dale, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 12:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11.11

have you got the Gnu versions of all the tools, ie gcc, make etc?
-Original Message-
From: Gibson, Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2004 18:01
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11.11
Hello All,
Can someone put me out of my misery?  I have attempted to build the
mod_jk.so for Apache 1.3.33 on HP-UX 11.11 multiple times and failing
miserable.  I have tried with multiple versions of the src but they ALL
continue to fail on line 22 of the apache13/Makefile referencing the
following during the make: 
# make
No suffix list.
Making all in common --- This runs but errors after performing the make to
the apache-1.3 Makefile Making all in apache-1.3
Make: line 22: syntax error.  Stop.
*** Error exit code 1
Line 21 -  JK_DIR := ..
Line 22 -  BUILD_DIR = ${JK_DIR}/../build/jk/apache13 I have tried
everything I can think of to get it to work but alas, I am obviously not
smart enough to figure it out.
Does someone have it already built that I could sponge off of in an attempt
to get it working for I retire?
Thanks In Advance,
Danny

RE: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11.11

[Dale, Matt]

have you got the Gnu versions of all the tools, ie gcc, make etc?

-Original Message-
From: Gibson, Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2004 18:01
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11.11


Hello All,

Can someone put me out of my misery?  I have attempted to build the
mod_jk.so for Apache 1.3.33 on HP-UX 11.11 multiple times and failing
miserable.  I have tried with multiple versions of the src but they ALL
continue to fail on line 22 of the apache13/Makefile referencing the
following during the make: 

# make
No suffix list.
Making all in common --- This runs but errors after performing the make to
the apache-1.3 Makefile
Making all in apache-1.3
Make: line 22: syntax error.  Stop.
*** Error exit code 1

Line 21 -  JK_DIR := ..
Line 22 -  BUILD_DIR = ${JK_DIR}/../build/jk/apache13

I have tried everything I can think of to get it to work but alas, I am
obviously not smart enough to figure it out.
Does someone have it already built that I could sponge off of in an attempt
to get it working for I retire?

Thanks In Advance,
Danny
Any opinions expressed in this E-mail may be those of the individual and not 
necessarily the company. This E-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not 
the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended 
recipient, be advised that you have received this E-mail in error and that any 
use or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in 
error please notify the beCogent postmaster at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unless expressly stated, opinions in this email are those of the individual 
sender and not beCogent Ltd. You must take full responsibility for virus 
checking this email and any attachments.
Please note that the content of this email or any of its attachments may 
contain data that falls within the scope of the Data Protection Acts and that 
you must ensure that any handling or processing of such data by you is fully 
compliant with the terms and provisions of the Data Protection Act 1984 and 
1998.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11.11

[Wendy Smoak]

From: "Gibson, Danny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Can someone put me out of my misery?  I have attempted to build the
> mod_jk.so for Apache 1.3.33 on HP-UX 11.11 multiple times and failing
> miserable.

I don't think we've ever had to compile it, it just comes with the
Apache/Tomcat distribution from HP.  I'm pretty sure they are free
downloads, look around here:
http://www.hp.com/products1/unix/webservers/apache/downloads/index.html

Does anything here help (even though it's old)?
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/mod_jk-howto.html#s64
What C compiler are you using?  I gather the one that comes with HP-UX won't
work, you have to either use GCC or buy HP's compiler.

Not much help, but just trying to keep another HP-UX user company. ;)

-- 
Wendy Smoak


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mod_jk.so

[Graham Bleach]

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:05:19PM -0500, QM wrote:
> Check your httpd.conf syntax: I forget the exact directive, but you must
> specify *two* lines to load a module in Apache 1.x; just "LoadModule"
> isn't enough.
> 
> Check other modules loaded in httpd.conf as a reference.  You'll have
> a block of "LoadModule" and then another block of That Other Directive
> I Can't Remember.

AddModule.

-- 
The art of taxation consists of plucking the goose so as to obtain the
most feathers with the least hissing.
-- Jean-Baptiste Colbert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mod_jk.so

[QM]

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:44:19PM -0500, Gibson, Danny wrote:
: Syntax error on line 654 of /opt/app/apache1.3.31/conf/httpd.conf:
: Invalid command 'JkMount', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not
: included in the server configuration
: ./apachectl start: httpd could not be started

This means the JK module didn't completely load.
(Module-specific config directives are set by the module itself.
 Generally speaking, if you know you've spelled a directive properly
 but you get this error, that means the module hasn't loaded.)

Check your httpd.conf syntax: I forget the exact directive, but you must
specify *two* lines to load a module in Apache 1.x; just "LoadModule"
isn't enough.

Check other modules loaded in httpd.conf as a reference.  You'll have
a block of "LoadModule" and then another block of That Other Directive
I Can't Remember.

-QM

-- 

software  -- http://www.brandxdev.net
tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64

[Brad Hafichuk]

btw, I did try the i386 version without any luck.

Anyone else know of any solution...

-Brad

- Original Message - 
From: "Lohan Spies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:55 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64


> Sorry didn't see you were using 64 bit.
>
> Just saw tomcat and fedora!
>
> I don't know give it a bash
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brad Hafichuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:43 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
>
> Are you telling me that the i386 version will work on a 64bit processor?
>
> -Brad
>
>
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Lohan Spies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:28 AM
> Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
>
>
> >
http://apache.is.co.za/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk2/binaries/linux/
> >
> > here is the link
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lohan Spies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:28 PM
> > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
> >
> > There is an already build binary on the Jakarta.tomcat site!
> > Just go to binaries and search around!
> >
> > It is a jk2 binary
> >
> > The package works, I installed it!
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brad Hafichuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:22 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
> >
> > I've been trying to find a mod_jk.so binary to connect Apache 2.0.48 to
> > Tomcat 4.1.29 on my AMD64 server, which is running Fedora Core 1 x86_64.
> > I've noticed that FreeBSD has a 64 bit version, any idea if someone is
> > working on one for Fedora?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Brad
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64

[Lohan Spies]

Sorry didn't see you were using 64 bit.

Just saw tomcat and fedora!

I don't know give it a bash

-Original Message-
From: Brad Hafichuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64

Are you telling me that the i386 version will work on a 64bit processor?

-Brad


- Original Message - 
From: "Lohan Spies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:28 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64


> http://apache.is.co.za/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk2/binaries/linux/
> 
> here is the link
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lohan Spies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:28 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
> 
> There is an already build binary on the Jakarta.tomcat site!
> Just go to binaries and search around!
> 
> It is a jk2 binary
> 
> The package works, I installed it!
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Brad Hafichuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
> 
> I've been trying to find a mod_jk.so binary to connect Apache 2.0.48 to
> Tomcat 4.1.29 on my AMD64 server, which is running Fedora Core 1 x86_64.
> I've noticed that FreeBSD has a 64 bit version, any idea if someone is
> working on one for Fedora?
> 
> Cheers,
> Brad
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64

[Brad Hafichuk]

Are you telling me that the i386 version will work on a 64bit processor?

-Brad


- Original Message - 
From: "Lohan Spies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:28 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64


> http://apache.is.co.za/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk2/binaries/linux/
> 
> here is the link
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lohan Spies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:28 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
> 
> There is an already build binary on the Jakarta.tomcat site!
> Just go to binaries and search around!
> 
> It is a jk2 binary
> 
> The package works, I installed it!
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Brad Hafichuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
> 
> I've been trying to find a mod_jk.so binary to connect Apache 2.0.48 to
> Tomcat 4.1.29 on my AMD64 server, which is running Fedora Core 1 x86_64.
> I've noticed that FreeBSD has a 64 bit version, any idea if someone is
> working on one for Fedora?
> 
> Cheers,
> Brad
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64

[Lohan Spies]

http://apache.is.co.za/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk2/binaries/linux/

here is the link

-Original Message-
From: Lohan Spies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:28 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64

There is an already build binary on the Jakarta.tomcat site!
Just go to binaries and search around!

It is a jk2 binary

The package works, I installed it!

-Original Message-
From: Brad Hafichuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64

I've been trying to find a mod_jk.so binary to connect Apache 2.0.48 to
Tomcat 4.1.29 on my AMD64 server, which is running Fedora Core 1 x86_64.
I've noticed that FreeBSD has a 64 bit version, any idea if someone is
working on one for Fedora?

Cheers,
Brad

RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64

[Lohan Spies]

There is an already build binary on the Jakarta.tomcat site!
Just go to binaries and search around!

It is a jk2 binary

The package works, I installed it!

-Original Message-
From: Brad Hafichuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64

I've been trying to find a mod_jk.so binary to connect Apache 2.0.48 to
Tomcat 4.1.29 on my AMD64 server, which is running Fedora Core 1 x86_64.
I've noticed that FreeBSD has a 64 bit version, any idea if someone is
working on one for Fedora?

Cheers,
Brad

Re: Mod_jk.so on Compaq Tru64

[Adrian Lanning]

Never seen that before.

Did a quick grep (grep -R 'map_alloc' *) through the mod_jk source files for
map_alloc and it is found in
jk/native/common/jk_map.h and
jk/native/common/jk_map.c

The error is saying that it can't find the lib to execute the function.
Maybe you didn't build the common lib...?

hth,
Adrian Lanning


- Original Message - 
From: "Sullivan, Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 2:05 PM
Subject: Mod_jk.so on Compaq Tru64


Does any one recognize these?

Built:
 Cannot load /usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so into server: dlopen:
 /usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so: symbol "map_alloc" unresolved

Binary:
Cannot load /usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so into server: dlopen:
 /usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so: symbol "__builtin_va_start"


Thank you,

Patrick Sullivan
Centura Health

-Original Message-
From: Brian Beckman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 4:39 PM
To: Sullivan, Patrick
Subject: RE: [Lawson_SysAdmin] Mod_jk.so on Compaq Tru64


Patrick,

1 ) Yes, I have "alphajava jawt.h   jni.hjvmdi.h  jvmpi.h "
in
$JAVA_HOME/include

2) I do have the classic dir in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH but the file is
actually libjvm.so, not libjvm.a

3) Java -verison gives:
java version "1.3.1"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition
Fast VM (build 1.3.1-2, native threads, mixed mode, 01/16/2002-13:22)

4) When I echo LD_LIBRARY_PATH, I get:

/lib:/usr/lib:/prod/ccs/lib:/prod/gen/lib/shared:/sfwr01/cobol/lib:/usr/
opt/
java
131/jre/lib/alpha/classic:/usr/opt/java131/jre/lib/alpha

I tried the find command and it did not find anything.

Any other ideas?

Thanks!
Brian

-Original Message-
From: Patrick J. Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 4:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Lawson_SysAdmin] Mod_jk.so on Compaq Tru64

Can you send your envvars file?

Goto $JAVA_HOME/include do you have jni.h and jvmXX.h (XX being place
holder for different flavors.) or just find $JAVA_HOME -name "*.h"

find the archive:  find $JAVA_HOME -name "*vm*.a"
on AIX with JDK 1.3.1 it is: /usr/java131/jre/bin/classic/libjvm.a

Is this path in your LIBPATH?

What vendor and version of JDK?

as for map_alloc sounds like /usr/lib or what ever HP uses is not in
your LIBPATH either.

find /usr/lib -exec grep -l map_alloc {} \; I believe it is defined in
/usr/lib/boot/unix which maybe a symbolic link to vendor specific file.

let me know

Brian Beckman wrote:
>
> For now, I'm using Apache 1.3.27, Tomcat 4.0.6, and the connector that
> came with the 4.0.6.
>
> I was able to build a mod_jk using apxs, but when I try to start
> apache, I
> get:
>
> Cannot load /usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so into server: dlopen:
> /usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so: symbol "map_alloc" unresolved
> /usr/local/bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started
>
> I found a pre-built mod_jk.so for Tru64 5.1 and when I use that, I get
> the following error:
>
> Syntax error on line 65 of /usr/local/stow/apache/etc/httpd.conf:
> Cannot load /usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so into server: dlopen:
> /usr/local/stow/apache/lib/mod_jk.so: symbol "__builtin_va_start"
> unresolved
> /usr/local/bin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Brian
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick J. Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 2:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Lawson_SysAdmin] Mod_jk.so on Compaq Tru64
>
> What error messages are you getting?
>
> Which version Apache?
> Which version Tomcat?
> Which version Connector?
>
>
> With mod_jk I had to play with my share libraries, path and cc
> options. Let me know
>
> Brian Beckman wrote:
> >
> >
> > I"m trying to get Apache/Tomcat to work on Tru64 without much luck.
> > Has anyone out there successfully built and loaded the mod_jk.so
> > module on
> > Tru64
> > 5.1?  If so, what c compiler, build command, and system libraries
> > did you use?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brian
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >


*
This communication is for the use of the intended recipient only.  It may
contain information that is privileged and confidential.  If you are not the
intended recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying, further
distribution or use thereof is prohibited.  If you have received this
communication in error, please advise me by return e-mail or by telephone
and
delete/destroy it.

*

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PR

Re: mod_jk.so not building :(

[Giuliano Gavazzi]

excuseme, but why did I announce the HOWTO (and binaries) of both 
mod_jk and mod_jk2?

Your link is old, although not even as old as my old howto on mod_jk 
but twice as involved.

Get the real thing: http://www.humph.com/docs/mod_jk.html

Giuliano

At 11:37 +0100 2003/10/16, James Snelling wrote:
Okay - I'm on a MAC OSX machine and I've got apache and tomcat-5.0.12
both installed and working standalone.
Apache was from source, tomcat from a binary.

I'm now trying to build the mod_jk.so so that apache can speak to
tomcat.
I've been following the instructions at
[...]
--
H U M P H
   || |||
 software
Java & C++ Server/Client/Human Interface applications on MacOS - MacOS X
http://www.humph.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18

[Turner, John]

Well, if you keep going with mod_webapp, it will all be wasted, eventually.
It's dead.

John

> -Original Message-
> From: [de internetman] Rene Kooyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:47 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18
> 
> 
> Citeren "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> > Yes, very.  This isn't a problem with mod_jk, as far as I can tell.
> > 
> > The 8080 URL didn't work for me just now, which implies to 
> me that Tomcat
> > isn't even up, but that might be due to maintenance instead 
> of error.
> > 
> > Can you post the log entries that you get when you try to access the
> > examples on port 80?  Apache's log, mod_jk's log in 
> particular.  You might
> > need to jack up JK's logging level.
> > 
> 
> Sorry, i've given up on mod_jk and am concentrating on 
> mod_webapp.so now.
> Seems to work (a little) better, however still not all is as 
> it should be,
> another 12 hour day 'waisted' trying to figure out what's wrong ...
> 
> .. just keep on going.. eventually we'll (all) get there ..
> 
> -- 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Rene Kooyman
> 
> 
> -
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18

[\[de internetman\] Rene Kooyman]

Citeren "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Yes, very.  This isn't a problem with mod_jk, as far as I can tell.
> 
> The 8080 URL didn't work for me just now, which implies to me that Tomcat
> isn't even up, but that might be due to maintenance instead of error.
> 
> Can you post the log entries that you get when you try to access the
> examples on port 80?  Apache's log, mod_jk's log in particular.  You might
> need to jack up JK's logging level.
> 

Sorry, i've given up on mod_jk and am concentrating on mod_webapp.so now.
Seems to work (a little) better, however still not all is as it should be,
another 12 hour day 'waisted' trying to figure out what's wrong ...

.. just keep on going.. eventually we'll (all) get there ..

-- 
Kind regards,

Rene Kooyman


-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18

[Turner, John]

Yes, very.  This isn't a problem with mod_jk, as far as I can tell.

The 8080 URL didn't work for me just now, which implies to me that Tomcat
isn't even up, but that might be due to maintenance instead of error.

Can you post the log entries that you get when you try to access the
examples on port 80?  Apache's log, mod_jk's log in particular.  You might
need to jack up JK's logging level.

John

> -Original Message-
> From: [de internetman] Rene Kooyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:16 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List; Bill Barker
> Subject: Re: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18
> 
> 
> > > http://web.jurriaan.org/examples/jsp/   [ nothin ]
> > 
> > Clicking on this link for me gives a nice, pretty Tomcat 
> page.  Are you
> > sure
> > that you don't have a caching Proxy server between you and it?
> 
> Hi Bill,
> 
> The problem isn't that these page's show up (fortunatly) but 
> just click
> on one of the examples. Then you'll notice that the scripts 
> aren't run,
> you'll just get the source code.. But when you add the port 
> 8080 to the
> URL... he presto! Odd, ... or isn't it ?
> 
> > > http://web.jurriaan.org:8080/examples/jsp/  [ presto: they work ]
> 
> 
> -- 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Rene Kooyman
> 
> 
> -
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18

[\[de internetman\] Rene Kooyman]

> > http://web.jurriaan.org/examples/jsp/   [ nothin ]
> 
> Clicking on this link for me gives a nice, pretty Tomcat page.  Are you
> sure
> that you don't have a caching Proxy server between you and it?

Hi Bill,

The problem isn't that these page's show up (fortunatly) but just click
on one of the examples. Then you'll notice that the scripts aren't run,
you'll just get the source code.. But when you add the port 8080 to the
URL... he presto! Odd, ... or isn't it ?

> > http://web.jurriaan.org:8080/examples/jsp/  [ presto: they work ]


-- 
Kind regards,

Rene Kooyman


-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18

[Bill Barker]

"[de internetman] Rene Kooyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Citeren "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Compile/Recompile:
> >
> > In CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native (where CONNECTOR_SRC = wherever you unpacked
the
> > connector src):
> >
> > ./buildconf.sh
> > ./configure --with-apxs=/path/to/apache/bin/apxs
> > make
> > make install
> >
> > The .so file will be in CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native or native2, I forget
which.
>
> Hi John and all others,
>
> I've done this, copied the file(s) to the right location, did all the
> proper modifications and still ... everything will work from port 8080,
> but not through apache, just have a look:
>
> http://web.jurriaan.org/examples/jsp/   [ nothin ]


Clicking on this link for me gives a nice, pretty Tomcat page.  Are you sure
that you don't have a caching Proxy server between you and it?

> http://web.jurriaan.org:8080/examples/jsp/  [ presto: they work ]
>
> I will keep trying to get things right... i think i can ... i think
> i can ... i think i can ... i think i can ...
>
> :-)
>
>
> --
> Kind regards,
>
> Rene Kooyman
>
>
> -




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18

[\[de internetman\] Rene Kooyman]

Citeren "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Compile/Recompile:
> 
> In CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native (where CONNECTOR_SRC = wherever you unpacked the
> connector src):
> 
> ./buildconf.sh
> ./configure --with-apxs=/path/to/apache/bin/apxs
> make
> make install
> 
> The .so file will be in CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native or native2, I forget which.

Hi John and all others,

I've done this, copied the file(s) to the right location, did all the
proper modifications and still ... everything will work from port 8080,
but not through apache, just have a look:

http://web.jurriaan.org/examples/jsp/   [ nothin ]
http://web.jurriaan.org:8080/examples/jsp/  [ presto: they work ]

I will keep trying to get things right... i think i can ... i think
i can ... i think i can ... i think i can ...

:-)


-- 
Kind regards,

Rene Kooyman


-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18

[Bill Barker]

"[de internetman] Rene Kooyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Oke, that's done, just use the: /usr/lib/apache folder .. p,
> now were getting somewhere, although i can't compile normaly because
> apxs is located in the other folder ... so be it 
>
> Now md_jk.so will load... but here's the error messages i was telling
> you about earlier:
>
> [warn] Loaded DSO modules/mod_jk.so uses plain Apache 1.3 API, this module
> might crash under EAPI! (please recompile it with -DEAPI)
>
>
> And like i said before, should this be safe to ignore ... or do i have to
> recompile ... and if so: how ?
>

It will probably crash (unless you disable SSL support at runtime).  You
need to provide the correct --with-apxs path the the mod_jk configure script
so that it knows to compile with the EAPI code.

> --
> Kind regards,
>
> Rene Kooyman
>
>
> -




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18

[Subir Sengupta]

I get that too and it doesn't cause any problems.  I didn't build Apache so
I don't know what's causing it.  However you can probably safely ignore it.

Subir

-Original Message-
From: [de internetman] Rene Kooyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18


Oke, that's done, just use the: /usr/lib/apache folder .. p,
now were getting somewhere, although i can't compile normaly because
apxs is located in the other folder ... so be it 

Now md_jk.so will load... but here's the error messages i was telling
you about earlier:

[warn] Loaded DSO modules/mod_jk.so uses plain Apache 1.3 API, this module 
might crash under EAPI! (please recompile it with -DEAPI)


And like i said before, should this be safe to ignore ... or do i have to
recompile ... and if so: how ?

-- 
Kind regards,

Rene Kooyman


-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18

[Turner, John]

Compile/Recompile:

In CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native (where CONNECTOR_SRC = wherever you unpacked the
connector src):

./buildconf.sh
./configure --with-apxs=/path/to/apache/bin/apxs
make
make install

The .so file will be in CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native or native2, I forget which.

John

> -Original Message-
> From: [de internetman] Rene Kooyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 3:33 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27 / tomcat 4.1.18
> 
> 
> Oke, that's done, just use the: /usr/lib/apache folder .. p,
> now were getting somewhere, although i can't compile normaly because
> apxs is located in the other folder ... so be it 
> 
> Now md_jk.so will load... but here's the error messages i was telling
> you about earlier:
> 
> [warn] Loaded DSO modules/mod_jk.so uses plain Apache 1.3 
> API, this module 
> might crash under EAPI! (please recompile it with -DEAPI)
> 
> 
> And like i said before, should this be safe to ignore ... or 
> do i have to
> recompile ... and if so: how ?
> 
> -- 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Rene Kooyman
> 
> 
> -
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MOD_JK.SO

[Ben Ricker]

On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 12:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> 
> according to this :
> 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/config/connectors.html
> 
> i should need mod_jk2 and not mod_jk (well, mod_jk may also work, but
> hey,..) - and its enabled by default on the appserver im using..

I use the mod_jk version for stability reasons: mod_jk2 is rather new,
so I would rather use the mostly "tried-and-true" mod_jk 1.x. That is my
personal opinion, though. Others use mod_jk2 without any problems.
 
> If by any chance i am right, can someone tell me why I cant find a humble
> link to download the file ?  maybe jakarta are having webserver problems.

Try http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/ for
connetor downloads, or go to John Turner's wonderful page:
http://www.johnturner.com/howto/apache-tomcat-howto.html.

Ben Ricker
Wellinx.com


 
> I quote from the site :
> 
> 
> 
> (Do not hesitate to ask for the binary needed for your platform to  
> the Tomcat mail lists, but be patient). 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> so here goes : im using linux - can i have this file - please..
> 
> thanks 4 reading this far.
> 
> Mehdi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>   
>   Mehdi.Nejad@bluew  
>   
>   ave.com  To:   "Tomcat Users List" 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   
>cc:   
>   
>   29/10/2002 18:02 Subject:  MOD_JK.SO   
>   
>   Please respond to  
>   
>   "Tomcat Users  
>   
>   List"  
>   
>  
>   
>  
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We are trying to get Tomcat 4.1.12 and Apache 1 3 26 working together using
> mod_jk.so.
> 
> We are receiving the followitng error :
> 
> Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 224 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
> Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so into server:
> /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so:
>  undefined symbol: ap_ctx_get
> 
> Never done this before, and im probably just plain wrong !
> 
> Any replys would be apperciated,
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> M
> 
> Mehdi Nejad - Senior Developer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ~~
> Bluewave Ltd - Online Creations
> http://www.bluewave.com
> Tel. +44 (0)20 7479 8394
> ~~
> 
> 
> 
>   "Jordi Guijarro"
> 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   ab.es>   cc:
> 
>Subject:  Run Tomcat 4.1.2
> on Novell
>   29/10/2002 17:38
> 
>   Please respond to
> 
>   "Tomcat Users
> 
>   List"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> How can I run Tomcat 4.1.2 on Novell Netware 5.1 ¿?  Nowadays I've a
> script (ncf file)  to start catalina in Tomcat 4.0.4 version. This
> script is not included in Tomcat 4.1.2. Someone knows about it ?
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Jordi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
> mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <
> mailto:tomcat-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: MOD_JK.SO

[Mehdi . Nejad]

according to this :

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/config/connectors.html

i should need mod_jk2 and not mod_jk (well, mod_jk may also work, but
hey,..) - and its enabled by default on the appserver im using..

If by any chance i am right, can someone tell me why I cant find a humble
link to download the file ?  maybe jakarta are having webserver problems.

I quote from the site :



(Do not hesitate to ask for the binary needed for your platform to  
the Tomcat mail lists, but be patient). 




so here goes : im using linux - can i have this file - please..

thanks 4 reading this far.

Mehdi







   
 
  Mehdi.Nejad@bluew
 
  ave.com  To:   "Tomcat Users List" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   
   cc: 
 
  29/10/2002 18:02 Subject:  MOD_JK.SO 
 
  Please respond to
 
  "Tomcat Users
 
  List"
 
   
 
   
 





Hi,

We are trying to get Tomcat 4.1.12 and Apache 1 3 26 working together using
mod_jk.so.

We are receiving the followitng error :

Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 224 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so into server:
/usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so:
 undefined symbol: ap_ctx_get

Never done this before, and im probably just plain wrong !

Any replys would be apperciated,

Cheers,

M

Mehdi Nejad - Senior Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~
Bluewave Ltd - Online Creations
http://www.bluewave.com
Tel. +44 (0)20 7479 8394
~~



  "Jordi Guijarro"

  
  ab.es>   cc:

   Subject:  Run Tomcat 4.1.2
on Novell
  29/10/2002 17:38

  Please respond to

  "Tomcat Users

  List"







Hi,

How can I run Tomcat 4.1.2 on Novell Netware 5.1 ¿?  Nowadays I've a
script (ncf file)  to start catalina in Tomcat 4.0.4 version. This
script is not included in Tomcat 4.1.2. Someone knows about it ?

Thank you,

Jordi






--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:tomcat-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>






--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: MOD_JK.SO

[Ben Ricker]

I got this on Apache 1.3.27. I assume you downloaded the binary
mod_jk.so. Make sure that you got that fits your use or non-use of SSL
in the server. Not sure where you got the binary, but there is a note on
the jakarta connector download page that lists which binary is for
which.

I myself just compiled the connector from source; I could not get the
binary connector to work with Apache without getting that error.

Ben Ricker
Wellinx.com

On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 12:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We are trying to get Tomcat 4.1.12 and Apache 1 3 26 working together using
> mod_jk.so.
> 
> We are receiving the followitng error :
> 
> Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 224 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
> Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so into server:
> /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so:
>  undefined symbol: ap_ctx_get
> 
> Never done this before, and im probably just plain wrong !
> 
> Any replys would be apperciated,
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> M
> 
> Mehdi Nejad - Senior Developer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ~~
> Bluewave Ltd - Online Creations
> http://www.bluewave.com
> Tel. +44 (0)20 7479 8394
> ~~
> 
> 
>  
>   
>   "Jordi Guijarro"   
>   
>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   
>   ab.es>   cc:   
>   
>Subject:  Run Tomcat 4.1.2 on Novell  
>   
>   29/10/2002 17:38   
>   
>   Please respond to  
>   
>   "Tomcat Users  
>   
>   List"  
>   
>  
>   
>  
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> How can I run Tomcat 4.1.2 on Novell Netware 5.1 ¿?  Nowadays I've a
> script (ncf file)  to start catalina in Tomcat 4.0.4 version. This
> script is not included in Tomcat 4.1.2. Someone knows about it ?
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Jordi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: mod_jk.so where from ??

[Ben Souther]

Oops,  didn't read the entire thread before replying.  Shame on me...







- Original Message -
From: "Ben Souther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so where from ??


> Sorry, I mean here:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.10/src/
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ben Souther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:18 AM
> Subject: Re: mod_jk.so where from ??
>
>
> > I found it here:
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.10/bin/
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Adar Wesley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:05 AM
> > Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??
> >
> >
> > > 10x John !
> > >
> > > and where would that web site be ?
> > >
> > > Tal
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
> > > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > > Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > My website by the end of the week.  Other than that, no.  Everyone has
> > been
> > > building them from source.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Adar Wesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 AM
> > > > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > > > Subject: mod_jk.so where from ??
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Group !
> > > >
> > > > I'm creating an installer that deploys tomcat on various systems.
> > > > Does anyone have any idea where may I find a collection of compiled
> > > > mod_jk.so for various systems ??
> > > >
> > > > Thanks !
> > > > Tal
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: mod_jk.so where from ??

[Ben Souther]

Sorry, I mean here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.10/src/
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Souther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so where from ??


> I found it here:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.10/bin/
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Adar Wesley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:05 AM
> Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??
>
>
> > 10x John !
> >
> > and where would that web site be ?
> >
> > Tal
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
> > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??
> >
> >
> >
> > My website by the end of the week.  Other than that, no.  Everyone has
> been
> > building them from source.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Adar Wesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 AM
> > > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > > Subject: mod_jk.so where from ??
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Group !
> > >
> > > I'm creating an installer that deploys tomcat on various systems.
> > > Does anyone have any idea where may I find a collection of compiled
> > > mod_jk.so for various systems ??
> > >
> > > Thanks !
> > > Tal
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: mod_jk.so where from ??

[Turner, John]

Which connector binaries did you find there?

John


> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Souther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:18 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: mod_jk.so where from ??
> 
> 
> I found it here:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4
> .1.10/bin/
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Adar Wesley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:05 AM
> Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??
> 
> 
> > 10x John !
> >
> > and where would that web site be ?
> >
> > Tal
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
> > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??
> >
> >
> >
> > My website by the end of the week.  Other than that, no.  
> Everyone has
> been
> > building them from source.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Adar Wesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 AM
> > > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > > Subject: mod_jk.so where from ??
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Group !
> > >
> > > I'm creating an installer that deploys tomcat on various systems.
> > > Does anyone have any idea where may I find a collection 
> of compiled
> > > mod_jk.so for various systems ??
> > >
> > > Thanks !
> > > Tal
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: mod_jk.so where from ??

[Ben Souther]

I found it here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.10/bin/



- Original Message -
From: "Adar Wesley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:05 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??


> 10x John !
>
> and where would that web site be ?
>
> Tal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??
>
>
>
> My website by the end of the week.  Other than that, no.  Everyone has
been
> building them from source.
>
> John
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Adar Wesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 AM
> > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > Subject: mod_jk.so where from ??
> >
> >
> > Hi Group !
> >
> > I'm creating an installer that deploys tomcat on various systems.
> > Does anyone have any idea where may I find a collection of compiled
> > mod_jk.so for various systems ??
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Tal
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: mod_jk.so where from ??

[Turner, John]

http://www.johnturner.com/howto but as I said, there aren't any files
available for download at the moment, other than HOWTOs.

John


> -Original Message-
> From: Adar Wesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:06 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??
> 
> 
> 10x John !
> 
> and where would that web site be ?
> 
> Tal
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??
> 
> 
> 
> My website by the end of the week.  Other than that, no.  
> Everyone has been
> building them from source.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Adar Wesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 AM
> > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > Subject: mod_jk.so where from ??
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Group !
> > 
> > I'm creating an installer that deploys tomcat on various systems.
> > Does anyone have any idea where may I find a collection of compiled
> > mod_jk.so for various systems ??
> > 
> > Thanks !
> > Tal
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: mod_jk.so where from ??

[Adar Wesley]

10x John !

and where would that web site be ?

Tal

-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??



My website by the end of the week.  Other than that, no.  Everyone has been
building them from source.

John


> -Original Message-
> From: Adar Wesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: mod_jk.so where from ??
> 
> 
> Hi Group !
> 
> I'm creating an installer that deploys tomcat on various systems.
> Does anyone have any idea where may I find a collection of compiled
> mod_jk.so for various systems ??
> 
> Thanks !
> Tal
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: mod_jk.so where from ??

[Turner, John]

My website by the end of the week.  Other than that, no.  Everyone has been
building them from source.

John


> -Original Message-
> From: Adar Wesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: mod_jk.so where from ??
> 
> 
> Hi Group !
> 
> I'm creating an installer that deploys tomcat on various systems.
> Does anyone have any idea where may I find a collection of compiled
> mod_jk.so for various systems ??
> 
> Thanks !
> Tal
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: mod_jk.so eapi needed...

[MadBit]

Sorry, for linux:

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/linux/i386/ 



MadBit wrote:

>mod_jk seems the same for tc3.x. Take this:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/win32/i386/ 
>
>
>
> Tomas Straupis wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>>  I have ap13 and tc4. I want to connect them. But I can't find mod_jk.so
>> (eapi). jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors seems 
>> empty. All
>> mirrors I found using google, altavista etc. are also empty (this 
>> particular
>> directory).
>>
>>  Can somebody help me by pointing out a working link to a file (or 
>> rpm, or
>> whatever), or by putting that file in ftp://perkunas.vtu.lt, or just by
>> mailing it to me?
>>
>>  Thanks in advance.
>>
>> P.S. rh73 on i686.
>>
>> Tomas Straupis
>> VGTU informaciniø sistemø skyrius
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>> 
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
>
>





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: mod_jk.so eapi needed...

[MadBit]

mod_jk seems the same for tc3.x. Take this:

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/win32/i386/


Tomas Straupis wrote:

>Hello
>
>  I have ap13 and tc4. I want to connect them. But I can't find mod_jk.so
>(eapi). jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors seems empty. All
>mirrors I found using google, altavista etc. are also empty (this particular
>directory).
>
>  Can somebody help me by pointing out a working link to a file (or rpm, or
>whatever), or by putting that file in ftp://perkunas.vtu.lt, or just by
>mailing it to me?
>
>  Thanks in advance.
>
>P.S. rh73 on i686.
>
>Tomas Straupis
>VGTU informaciniø sistemø skyrius
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>For additional commands, e-mail: 
>
>
>  
>





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: mod_jk.so

[Billingham, Walter 475]

Hello Again,

Can anybody share a copy of their mod_jk.conf file, workers.properties, and
server.xml that has Tomcat 4.0.1 and Apache2 or Apache 1.3.x running, I
would greatly appreciate it.  Thanks. Walter B. 



> Ok,
> 
>   I now have several compiled versions of mod_jk.so thanks to everyone
> for contributing to that.  I am lost again though, what is the next step
> in
> this process to get Apache and Tomcat connected?  I believe it is using
> the
> make file or apxs on the .so to get it on board with Apache, so in the
> Make
> files I have, they all reference /include in JDK and /libexec in apache, I
> know I have asked before to no avail, what are these equivalents in Apache
> 2
> and Java 1.3 and up?  Thanks. Trask.
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> 
> 

--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately 
notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown.  This e-mail transmission may 
contain confidential information.  This information is intended only for the use of 
the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly.  
Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient.  Thank you for 
your compliance. Copyright (c) 2002 CIGNA




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: mod_jk.so

[Arnaud HERITIER]

to install mod_jk you should read this :
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/config/ajp.html

> -Message d'origine-
> De : Billingham, Walter 475 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoye : mardi 23 juillet 2002 15:23
> A : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Objet : mod_jk.so
> 
> 
> Ok,
> 
>   I now have several compiled versions of mod_jk.so 
> thanks to everyone
> for contributing to that.  I am lost again though, what is 
> the next step in
> this process to get Apache and Tomcat connected?  I believe 
> it is using the
> make file or apxs on the .so to get it on board with Apache, 
> so in the Make
> files I have, they all reference /include in JDK and /libexec 
> in apache, I
> know I have asked before to no avail, what are these 
> equivalents in Apache 2
> and Java 1.3 and up?  Thanks. Trask.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this e-mail in 
> error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the 
> address shown.  This e-mail transmission may contain 
> confidential information.  This information is intended only 
> for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is 
> intended even if addressed incorrectly.  Please delete it 
> from your files if you are not the intended recipient.  Thank 
> you for your compliance. Copyright (c) 2002 CIGNA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11

[John Whitley]

Trigo,


We succesfully use mod_jk.so in the HP version of Apache 1.3.26 on both 
11.00 and 11.11i. The recently fixed versions are at

FTP Access: ftp://apache:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

I don't  know if these have been translated in to product bundles yet.

John

PELOQUIN,JEFFREY (Non-HP-Boise,ex1) wrote:

>Trigo,
>
>You could try downloading the HP provided apache/tomcat located at
>www.hp.com/products/webservers/apache/index.html
>
>the 2.0 version uses mod_jk and the provided binary might work for you.
>
>We use the warp connection for our work but if I get a chance I might try
>compiling mod_jk and see how it works.
>what version of apache are you using?
>
>Jeff 
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Antonio Trigo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:36 AM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11
>
>
>Ravi,
>
>Can u send me the binary version of mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Trigo
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ravi Verma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: sexta-feira, 14 de Junho de 2002 3:37
>To: 'Tomcat Users List'
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11
>
>
>Dear Friends,
>
>I am in desperate need for a binary version of mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11. If
>you gone through this process, could you please share the file with me.
>
>Regards.
>
>Ravi Verma
>916 705 3261
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11

[PELOQUIN,JEFFREY (Non-HP-Boise,ex1)]

Trigo,

You could try downloading the HP provided apache/tomcat located at
www.hp.com/products/webservers/apache/index.html

the 2.0 version uses mod_jk and the provided binary might work for you.

We use the warp connection for our work but if I get a chance I might try
compiling mod_jk and see how it works.
what version of apache are you using?

Jeff 

-Original Message-
From: Antonio Trigo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11


Ravi,

Can u send me the binary version of mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11.

Thanks in advance.

Trigo


-Original Message-
From: Ravi Verma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: sexta-feira, 14 de Junho de 2002 3:37
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11


Dear Friends,

I am in desperate need for a binary version of mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11. If
you gone through this process, could you please share the file with me.

Regards.

Ravi Verma
916 705 3261


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11

[Antonio Trigo]

Ravi,

Can u send me the binary version of mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11.

Thanks in advance.

Trigo


-Original Message-
From: Ravi Verma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: sexta-feira, 14 de Junho de 2002 3:37
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11


Dear Friends,

I am in desperate need for a binary version of mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11. If
you gone through this process, could you please share the file with me.

Regards.

Ravi Verma
916 705 3261


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: mod_jk.so not working on upgrade

[developer]

HELP i asked this question yesterday still no reply
ryan

On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Having problem upgrading a box.  The box is running red hat linux
> 6.2 with apache 1.3.20 with modssl, it is running with Tomcat 3.2.2. I was
> in the process of upgrading my apache 1.3.20 to 1.3.26. By the way I am
> enabling DSO support.  I was able 
> to upgrade the apache/modssl package successfully except it bombs
> out on the mod_jk.so.  The error I am getting when starting apache(tomcat
> is already started without errors) is this:
> "Syntax error on line 8 of /usr/local/tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf-auto: API 
> module structure `jk_module' in file  usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so 
> is garbled -perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?"
> 
> So does this mean the mod_jk.so module is not compatible with the upgraded
> version of apache?  How can I fix?  Or is my apache install bad?
> 
> Thanks
> -ryan
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: mod_jk.so for the new tomcat!

[Milt Epstein]

On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, abhishek srivastava wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> I have downloaded the new tomcat 4.0.4 today. I also downloaded the source
> for the jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.4-src ... when I run ant the build
> says build successfull. but there is no mod_jk.so to be found.
>
> I also went in a directory called "native" and ran the ant from there but
> this time I got some wierd JNI errors for C files. this is the place where I
> am stuck.
>
> As far as I know, if the mod_jk.so file is not there then apache will not
> talk to tomcat!
[ ... ]

Were there any files with names close to mod_jk.so?  Like perhaps
libmod_jk.so.0 or something like that?  Also, what platform are you
on?  It sounds like I'm having similar problems, there are no error
messages, the build seems like it goes OK, but there's no mod_jk.so
file.  I do have some other similarly named files though.  I'm on AIX.

Milt Epstein
Research Programmer
Systems and Technology Services (STS)
Campus Information Technologies and Educational Services (CITES)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: mod_jk.so for the new tomcat!

[Milt Epstein]

On 24 Jun 2002, Sean M Alderman wrote:

> On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 10:54, abhishek srivastava wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I have downloaded the new tomcat 4.0.4 today. I also downloaded the source
> > for the jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.4-src ... when I run ant the build
> > says build successfull. but there is no mod_jk.so to be found.
>
> When you run ant to build the connectors, in
> jakarta-tomcat-connectors-src/jk try running 'ant native' to build
> mod_jk.so.  I didn't have much luck doing this on my solaris8 box, but I
> know why that didn't work, just not how to fix it (it was a solaris
> specific issue).

What problem are you running into?  I'm doing something like this to
build it on AIX, and I'm not sure it's working.  The "not sure" part
is because it doesn't fail (I'm talking about it actually creating
mod_jk.so), but there is no mod_jk.so file to be found.  There are
some other similarly named files though, like mod_jk.lo and
libmod_jk.so.0, but I don't know if I can just rename one of them and
use it.

Milt Epstein
Research Programmer
Systems and Technology Services (STS)
Campus Information Technologies and Educational Services (CITES)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: mod_jk.so for the new tomcat!

[Sean M Alderman]

On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 10:54, abhishek srivastava wrote:
> Hello All,
> 
> I have downloaded the new tomcat 4.0.4 today. I also downloaded the source 
> for the jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.4-src ... when I run ant the build 
> says build successfull. but there is no mod_jk.so to be found.

When you run ant to build the connectors, in
jakarta-tomcat-connectors-src/jk try running 'ant native' to build
mod_jk.so.  I didn't have much luck doing this on my solaris8 box, but I
know why that didn't work, just not how to fix it (it was a solaris 
specific issue).


> 
> PS: If someone has already succeeded in building the binaries of mod_jk for 
> LINUX 7.3 platform, then please send it to me.

I assume you mean RedHat 7.3.  You should be able to use the binary
connector here -
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.3/bin/linux/i386/


> 
> _
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 
-- 
Sean M. Alderman
ITRACK Systems Analyst
PACE/NCI - NASA Glenn Research Center
(216) 433-2795

Calling a windowed operating system "Windows" is like naming an
automobile "Wheels."

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: mod_jk.so tomcat 4.0.3 and apache 1.3.22

[zibie]

is there something to do to omit this error 
i can't use AJP connector.

My system is Linux/Slackware 8.0 and kernel 2.4.19pre1
Tomcat version 4.0.3
Connector from package jakarta-connector-tomcat-4.0.2src download from 
jakarta.apache.org.

i did:
tar zxf jakarta-connector-tomcat-4.0.2src
cd jakarta-connector-tomcat-4.0.2src/jk/native/apache-1.3
chmod 750 build-unix.sh
./build-unix.sh

compilation ok
cp mod_jk.so /usr/local/apache/libexec

I haven't get any error information.

If I upgrade Apache to 1.3.23 or 1.3.24 the problem disapear ?
Maybe Apache 2.x.x ?

Użytkownik PJ Crump napisał:
> I have been getting the same error for days and have tried a lot of things
> to no avail.  Lets try to share our experiences and hopefully we can both
> find a solution
>>I have a problem with connector ajp.
>>When i try to load mod_jk.so into apache 1.3.22, in log file i find:
>>
>>tail logs/mod_jk.logs
>>
>>[Wed Jun 12 12:02:17 2002]  [jk_connect.c (151)]: jk_open_socket,
>>connect() failed errno = 111
>>[Wed Jun 12 12:02:17 2002]  [jk_ajp_common.c (598)]: In
>>jk_endpoint_t::ajp_connect_to_endpoint, failed errno = 111
>>
>>how can i solve this problem ?
>>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: mod_jk.so tomcat 4.0.3 and apache 1.3.22

[PJ Crump]

I have been getting the same error for days and have tried a lot of things
to no avail.  Lets try to share our experiences and hopefully we can both
find a solution
- Original Message -
From: "zibie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 5:06 AM
Subject: mod_jk.so tomcat 4.0.3 and apache 1.3.22


>
> I have a problem with connector ajp.
> When i try to load mod_jk.so into apache 1.3.22, in log file i find:
>
> tail logs/mod_jk.logs
>
> [Wed Jun 12 12:02:17 2002]  [jk_connect.c (151)]: jk_open_socket,
> connect() failed errno = 111
> [Wed Jun 12 12:02:17 2002]  [jk_ajp_common.c (598)]: In
> jk_endpoint_t::ajp_connect_to_endpoint, failed errno = 111
>
> how can i solve this problem ?
>
> regards
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:

> For additional commands, e-mail:

>
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: mod_jk.so

[PELOQUIN,JEFFREY (Non-HP-Boise,ex1)]

Paolo,

I got my mod_webapp to compile

I enclose the apache/bin/apxs file with the compile params I used
you will need to put in your own paths. 

also, the HP-UX shell does not appear to allow zero-length variables.

When you run configure you most likely see alot of test errors asking you to
supply
a variable.  These errors arise from the variable to be tested is set to "",
i.e. $VAR = ""

When this happen HP-UX the shell appears to remove the variable completely
from memory and there is nothing to test!  That is why there are spaces at
certain placed

So you may need to walk through the configure program with echo statements
to determine where you need
to force the if test statements to do what you want

Good Luck
Jeff

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so


Hi,
thanks for the reply, in that site is not present only an old version 
of Tomcat with mod_jserv?

Thanks

Paolo

> I have been getting the same error trying to compile mod_webapp for to
mcat
> 4.  
> 
> Since you are using tomcat 3.3 you might check out
> http://www.hp.com/products1/unix/webservers/apache/index.html
> 
> and download the apache/tomcat application offered there.  it comes wi
th
> mod_jk.so according to the documentation on the site.
> 
> Today I am going to try and use the apache from the download site and
> compile mod_webapp against it and see if that solves the problem.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: mod_jk.so
> 
> 
> Please,
> could someone help me with this problem?
> 
> Hello all,
> I am trying to install Tomcat 3.3 on a system having HP-UX 11 and 
> Apache 1.3
> Unfortunately I couldn't compile mod_jk for an error in apxs.
> Please, has someone this module already compiled foe HP-UX?
> Do you know if the compiled version for Linux is compatible for my 
> system?
> Have you any suggestion to solve this problem?
> 
> Thanks a lot in advance.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Paolo
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 




apxs
Description: Binary data

--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: mod_jk.so

[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Hi,
thanks for the reply, in that site is not present only an old version 
of Tomcat with mod_jserv?

Thanks

Paolo

> I have been getting the same error trying to compile mod_webapp for to
mcat
> 4.  
> 
> Since you are using tomcat 3.3 you might check out
> http://www.hp.com/products1/unix/webservers/apache/index.html
> 
> and download the apache/tomcat application offered there.  it comes wi
th
> mod_jk.so according to the documentation on the site.
> 
> Today I am going to try and use the apache from the download site and
> compile mod_webapp against it and see if that solves the problem.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: mod_jk.so
> 
> 
> Please,
> could someone help me with this problem?
> 
> Hello all,
> I am trying to install Tomcat 3.3 on a system having HP-UX 11 and 
> Apache 1.3
> Unfortunately I couldn't compile mod_jk for an error in apxs.
> Please, has someone this module already compiled foe HP-UX?
> Do you know if the compiled version for Linux is compatible for my 
> system?
> Have you any suggestion to solve this problem?
> 
> Thanks a lot in advance.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Paolo
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe:   
> For additional commands: 
> Troubles with the list: 
> 
> 

RE: mod_jk.so

[PELOQUIN,JEFFREY (Non-HP-Boise,ex1)]

I have been getting the same error trying to compile mod_webapp for tomcat
4.  

Since you are using tomcat 3.3 you might check out
http://www.hp.com/products1/unix/webservers/apache/index.html

and download the apache/tomcat application offered there.  it comes with
mod_jk.so according to the documentation on the site.

Today I am going to try and use the apache from the download site and
compile mod_webapp against it and see if that solves the problem.

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_jk.so


Please,
could someone help me with this problem?

Hello all,
I am trying to install Tomcat 3.3 on a system having HP-UX 11 and 
Apache 1.3
Unfortunately I couldn't compile mod_jk for an error in apxs.
Please, has someone this module already compiled foe HP-UX?
Do you know if the compiled version for Linux is compatible for my 
system?
Have you any suggestion to solve this problem?

Thanks a lot in advance.

Regards

Paolo

--
To unsubscribe:   
For additional commands: 
Troubles with the list: 

Re: mod_jk.so compiled for Solaris 8

[Marc Ponschab]

Hi,

Ed Tybursky wrote:
> Does anyone have a compiled version of mod_jk.so for Solaris 8 running
> on a sparc that I may have real quick?

I've uploaded some (with and without EAPI) to http://ponschab.de/mod_jk/
But i recommend compiling mod_jk by yourself.

Marc

Re: mod_jk.so woes

[David Smith]

I got my mod_jk file from the Tomcat 3.3 binary distribution.  There's a 
folder in there named native with two version of mod_jk -- eap and noeap.  
How your Apache was built (with or with out EAP) will determine which to use. 
 Just a hint though -- if your version of Apache uses SSL, it definitely was 
built with EAP.  If you don't have SSL, well then it's still a maybe, maybe 
not.

--David Smith

On Friday 31 August 2001 02:30 pm, you wrote:
> I've been having problems for days compiling mod_jk.so.  I would like to
> see if a pre-compiled one would work for me.
> Does someone have this file available for me to use.
>
> I am running Apache 1.3.9, Tomcat 3.2.3, and Solaris 8.
>
> Thanks,
> Brett
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: mod_jk.so differences

[GOMEZ Henri]

It was answered many times before.

http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09075.html

People should really take a look at :

USER LIST :

http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user%40jakarta.apache.org/

DEV LIST :

http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-dev%40jakarta.apache.org/

-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) 
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-Original Message-
>From: Michael Weissenbacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:14 PM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
>
>
>thank you, i've always wondered about this...
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jan Labanowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:29 PM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
>
>
>It seems like you can either be correct or you have to make it easy for
>people who refuse to read the background information.
>
>"mod_jk-eapi.so" is for the EAPI (Extended Application Programming
>Interface) of
>Apache. You USUALLY need the EAPI when you install mod_ssl module for
>Apache.
>But you can have Apache EAPI without having mod_ssl installed/loaded.
>So, you can have the combinations:
>
>  Apache + EAPI + (no mod_ssl) + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
>and you can have the combination
>
>  Apache + EAPI + mod_ssl + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
>
>
>But you cannot have combination
>
>  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_ssl + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
>or
>
>  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
>
>But you can have:
>
>  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_jk-noeapi.so
>
>In other words, it is not if mod_ssl installed with Apache.
>It is if Apache was patched to use EAPI. So the mod_jk-eapi.so 
>is a correct
>name, and mod_jk-ssl.so is not, since mod_jk variant does not 
>depend on ssl
>presence in Apache.
>
>Jan 
>
>
>On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Michael Weissenbacher wrote:
>
>> >How many times I have answered to that ?
>> >eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
>> >noeapi for std apache 
>> 
>> so why not name mod_jk-eapi.so -> mod_jk-ssl.so?
>> 
>> michael
>> 
>
>Jan K. Labanowski|phone: 614-292-9279,  FAX: 
>614-292-7168
>Ohio Supercomputer Center|Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>1224 Kinnear Rd, |http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html
>Columbus, OH 43212-1163  |http://www.osc.edu/
>

RE: mod_jk.so differences

[Michael Weissenbacher]

thank you, i've always wondered about this...

-Original Message-
From: Jan Labanowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:29 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences


It seems like you can either be correct or you have to make it easy for
people who refuse to read the background information.

"mod_jk-eapi.so" is for the EAPI (Extended Application Programming
Interface) of
Apache. You USUALLY need the EAPI when you install mod_ssl module for
Apache.
But you can have Apache EAPI without having mod_ssl installed/loaded.
So, you can have the combinations:

  Apache + EAPI + (no mod_ssl) + mod_jk-eapi.so

and you can have the combination

  Apache + EAPI + mod_ssl + mod_jk-eapi.so



But you cannot have combination

  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_ssl + mod_jk-eapi.so

or

  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_jk-eapi.so


But you can have:

  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_jk-noeapi.so

In other words, it is not if mod_ssl installed with Apache.
It is if Apache was patched to use EAPI. So the mod_jk-eapi.so is a correct
name, and mod_jk-ssl.so is not, since mod_jk variant does not depend on ssl
presence in Apache.

Jan 


On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Michael Weissenbacher wrote:

> >How many times I have answered to that ?
> >eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
> >noeapi for std apache 
> 
> so why not name mod_jk-eapi.so -> mod_jk-ssl.so?
> 
> michael
> 

Jan K. Labanowski|phone: 614-292-9279,  FAX: 614-292-7168
Ohio Supercomputer Center|Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
1224 Kinnear Rd, |http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html
Columbus, OH 43212-1163  |http://www.osc.edu/

Re: mod_jk.so differences

[Roberto B.]

This is a perfect explanation.. thanks!!

R.

- Original Message -
From: "Jan Labanowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences


> It seems like you can either be correct or you have to make it easy for
> people who refuse to read the background information.
>
> "mod_jk-eapi.so" is for the EAPI (Extended Application Programming
Interface) of
> Apache. You USUALLY need the EAPI when you install mod_ssl module for
Apache.
> But you can have Apache EAPI without having mod_ssl installed/loaded.
> So, you can have the combinations:
>
>   Apache + EAPI + (no mod_ssl) + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
> and you can have the combination
>
>   Apache + EAPI + mod_ssl + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
>
>
> But you cannot have combination
>
>   Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_ssl + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
> or
>
>   Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
>
> But you can have:
>
>   Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_jk-noeapi.so
>
> In other words, it is not if mod_ssl installed with Apache.
> It is if Apache was patched to use EAPI. So the mod_jk-eapi.so is a
correct
> name, and mod_jk-ssl.so is not, since mod_jk variant does not depend on
ssl
> presence in Apache.
>
> Jan
>
>
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Michael Weissenbacher wrote:
>
> > >How many times I have answered to that ?
> > >eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
> > >noeapi for std apache
> >
> > so why not name mod_jk-eapi.so -> mod_jk-ssl.so?
> >
> > michael
> >
>
> Jan K. Labanowski|phone: 614-292-9279,  FAX: 614-292-7168
> Ohio Supercomputer Center|Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 1224 Kinnear Rd, |http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html
> Columbus, OH 43212-1163  |http://www.osc.edu/
>

RE: mod_jk.so differences

[GOMEZ Henri]

Thanks Jan, I'll add this as readme.txt in
directory :)


-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) 
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-Original Message-
>From: Jan Labanowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:29 PM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
>
>
>It seems like you can either be correct or you have to make it easy for
>people who refuse to read the background information.
>
>"mod_jk-eapi.so" is for the EAPI (Extended Application 
>Programming Interface) of
>Apache. You USUALLY need the EAPI when you install mod_ssl 
>module for Apache.
>But you can have Apache EAPI without having mod_ssl installed/loaded.
>So, you can have the combinations:
>
>  Apache + EAPI + (no mod_ssl) + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
>and you can have the combination
>
>  Apache + EAPI + mod_ssl + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
>
>
>But you cannot have combination
>
>  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_ssl + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
>or
>
>  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_jk-eapi.so
>
>
>But you can have:
>
>  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_jk-noeapi.so
>
>In other words, it is not if mod_ssl installed with Apache.
>It is if Apache was patched to use EAPI. So the mod_jk-eapi.so 
>is a correct
>name, and mod_jk-ssl.so is not, since mod_jk variant does not 
>depend on ssl
>presence in Apache.
>
>Jan 
>
>
>On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Michael Weissenbacher wrote:
>
>> >How many times I have answered to that ?
>> >eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
>> >noeapi for std apache 
>> 
>> so why not name mod_jk-eapi.so -> mod_jk-ssl.so?
>> 
>> michael
>> 
>
>Jan K. Labanowski|phone: 614-292-9279,  FAX: 
>614-292-7168
>Ohio Supercomputer Center|Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>1224 Kinnear Rd, |http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html
>Columbus, OH 43212-1163  |http://www.osc.edu/
>

RE: mod_jk.so differences

[Jan Labanowski]

It seems like you can either be correct or you have to make it easy for
people who refuse to read the background information.

"mod_jk-eapi.so" is for the EAPI (Extended Application Programming Interface) of
Apache. You USUALLY need the EAPI when you install mod_ssl module for Apache.
But you can have Apache EAPI without having mod_ssl installed/loaded.
So, you can have the combinations:

  Apache + EAPI + (no mod_ssl) + mod_jk-eapi.so

and you can have the combination

  Apache + EAPI + mod_ssl + mod_jk-eapi.so



But you cannot have combination

  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_ssl + mod_jk-eapi.so

or

  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_jk-eapi.so


But you can have:

  Apache + (no EAPI) + mod_jk-noeapi.so

In other words, it is not if mod_ssl installed with Apache.
It is if Apache was patched to use EAPI. So the mod_jk-eapi.so is a correct
name, and mod_jk-ssl.so is not, since mod_jk variant does not depend on ssl
presence in Apache.

Jan 


On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Michael Weissenbacher wrote:

> >How many times I have answered to that ?
> >eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
> >noeapi for std apache 
> 
> so why not name mod_jk-eapi.so -> mod_jk-ssl.so?
> 
> michael
> 

Jan K. Labanowski|phone: 614-292-9279,  FAX: 614-292-7168
Ohio Supercomputer Center|Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
1224 Kinnear Rd, |http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html
Columbus, OH 43212-1163  |http://www.osc.edu/

Re: mod_jk.so differences

[Roberto B.]

yeah!!!
R.
- Original Message - 
From: "Michael Weissenbacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:00 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences


> >How many times I have answered to that ?
> >eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
> >noeapi for std apache 
> 
> so why not name mod_jk-eapi.so -> mod_jk-ssl.so?
> 
> michael
> 

RE: mod_jk.so differences

[Ferracci Leonardo]

A quick and dirty trick from docs (and my own personal experience):
-if you try to load the wrong module (via LoadModule in httpd.conf or
one of its included files), apache warns you; it is not an explicit
warning such as "using mod_jk-eapi.so instead of mod_jk-noeapi.so" or
viceversa, but it helps understanding that something's wrong with what
you are doing...

L.

-Original Message-
From: Michael Weissenbacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:00 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences


>How many times I have answered to that ?
>eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
>noeapi for std apache 

so why not name mod_jk-eapi.so -> mod_jk-ssl.so?

michael

RE: mod_jk.so differences

[Michael Weissenbacher]

>How many times I have answered to that ?
>eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
>noeapi for std apache 

so why not name mod_jk-eapi.so -> mod_jk-ssl.so?

michael

RE: mod_jk.so differences

[GOMEZ Henri]

>Yes.. but the difference with mod_jk.so is that mod_jk-eapi.so 
>can use SSL protocol?

How many times I have answered to that ?
eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
noeapi for std apache 

>I use Apache 1.3.. no matter that??
>
>Roby.
>
>
>> GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>> >
>> > So use directly  :
>> >
>> >
>http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/
>bin/linux/
>> >
>> > mod_jk-eapi.so (SSL)
>> >
>> > or
>> >
>> > mod_jk-noeapi.so (NON-SSL)
>> >
>> > :)
>> >
>> > -
>> > Henri Gomez ___[_]
>> > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
>> > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
>> > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>> >
>> > >-Original Message-
>> > >From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:26 AM
>> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >I use Debian...
>> > >
>> > >R.
>> > >
>> > >- Original Message -
>> > >From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:17 AM
>> > >Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> If you using Linux, may I propose you take a look
>> > >> at my RPMs :
>> > >>
>> > >> 
>http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/
rpms/
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> Henri Gomez ___[_]
> > >> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
> > >> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> > >> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >-Original Message-
> > >> >From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:12 AM
> > >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >sorry.. now I have understood!!
> > >> >but where I find mod_jk for Linux for Tomcat 3.2.3??
> > >> >
> > >> >Thanks!
> > >> >R.
> > >> >- Original Message -
> > >> >From: "Roberto B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:07 AM
> > >> >Subject: mod_jk.so differences
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >> I used Tomcat 4 with Apache but I have not found nobody that
> > >> >said to me
> > >> >how
> > >> >> to create virtual host... so I installed Tomcat 3.2.3
> > >> >> I have do get mod_jk.so but...what are the differences
> > >> >between the file
> > >> >in:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.1.1/bin/linux/i386
> > >> >>
> > >> >> and those in:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/bin/linux
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks!
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Roberto.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >

Re: mod_jk.so differences

[Roberto B.]

Yes.. but the difference with mod_jk.so is that mod_jk-eapi.so can use SSL
protocol?
I use Apache 1.3.. no matter that??

Roby.


> GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >
> > So use directly  :
> >
> >
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/bin/linux/
> >
> > mod_jk-eapi.so (SSL)
> >
> > or
> >
> > mod_jk-noeapi.so (NON-SSL)
> >
> > :)
> >
> > -
> > Henri Gomez ___[_]
> > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
> > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
> >
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:26 AM
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
> > >
> > >
> > >I use Debian...
> > >
> > >R.
> > >
> > >- Original Message -
> > >From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:17 AM
> > >Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
> > >
> > >
> > >> If you using Linux, may I propose you take a look
> > >> at my RPMs :
> > >>
> > >> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/rpms/
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> Henri Gomez         ___[_]
> > >> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
> > >> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> > >> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >-Original Message-
> > >> >From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:12 AM
> > >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >sorry.. now I have understood!!
> > >> >but where I find mod_jk for Linux for Tomcat 3.2.3??
> > >> >
> > >> >Thanks!
> > >> >R.
> > >> >- Original Message -
> > >> >From: "Roberto B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:07 AM
> > >> >Subject: mod_jk.so differences
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >> I used Tomcat 4 with Apache but I have not found nobody that
> > >> >said to me
> > >> >how
> > >> >> to create virtual host... so I installed Tomcat 3.2.3
> > >> >> I have do get mod_jk.so but...what are the differences
> > >> >between the file
> > >> >in:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.1.1/bin/linux/i386
> > >> >>
> > >> >> and those in:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/bin/linux
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks!
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Roberto.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >

Re: mod_jk.so differences

[P.Miller]

Hi gents,

once again I try to find my luck with this question:

can anyone provide me a compiled mod_jk.dll for use with
WindowsNT/Apache 1.3.20/Tomcat 3.2.3 and SSL?
I allways get the error ' mod_jk.dll not compiled for enhanced API!' and
I have no VC++ compiler, so please help.

Peter

GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> 
> So use directly  :
> 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/bin/linux/
> 
> mod_jk-eapi.so (SSL)
> 
> or
> 
> mod_jk-noeapi.so (NON-SSL)
> 
> :)
> 
> -
> Henri Gomez ___[_]
> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
> 
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:26 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
> >
> >
> >I use Debian...
> >
> >R.
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:17 AM
> >Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
> >
> >
> >> If you using Linux, may I propose you take a look
> >> at my RPMs :
> >>
> >> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/rpms/
> >>
> >> -
> >> Henri Gomez ___[_]
> >> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
> >> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> >> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >-Original Message-
> >> >From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:12 AM
> >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >sorry.. now I have understood!!
> >> >but where I find mod_jk for Linux for Tomcat 3.2.3??
> >> >
> >> >Thanks!
> >> >R.
> >> >- Original Message -
> >> >From: "Roberto B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:07 AM
> >> >Subject: mod_jk.so differences
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> I used Tomcat 4 with Apache but I have not found nobody that
> >> >said to me
> >> >how
> >> >> to create virtual host... so I installed Tomcat 3.2.3
> >> >> I have do get mod_jk.so but...what are the differences
> >> >between the file
> >> >in:
> >> >>
> >> >> builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.1.1/bin/linux/i386
> >> >>
> >> >> and those in:
> >> >>
> >> >> builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/bin/linux
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> Roberto.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >

RE: mod_jk.so differences

[GOMEZ Henri]

So use directly  :

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/bin/linux/

mod_jk-eapi.so (SSL)

or

mod_jk-noeapi.so (NON-SSL)

:)   

-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) 
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-Original Message-
>From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:26 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
>
>
>I use Debian...
>
>R.
>
>- Original Message - 
>From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:17 AM
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
>
>
>> If you using Linux, may I propose you take a look
>> at my RPMs :
>> 
>> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/rpms/
>> 
>> -
>> Henri Gomez ___[_]
>> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) 
>> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
>> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> >-Original Message-
>> >From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:12 AM
>> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
>> >
>> >
>> >sorry.. now I have understood!!
>> >but where I find mod_jk for Linux for Tomcat 3.2.3??
>> >
>> >Thanks!
>> >R.
>> >- Original Message -
>> >From: "Roberto B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:07 AM
>> >Subject: mod_jk.so differences
>> >
>> >
>> >> I used Tomcat 4 with Apache but I have not found nobody that 
>> >said to me
>> >how
>> >> to create virtual host... so I installed Tomcat 3.2.3
>> >> I have do get mod_jk.so but...what are the differences 
>> >between the file
>> >in:
>> >>
>> >> builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.1.1/bin/linux/i386
>> >>
>> >> and those in:
>> >>
>> >> builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/bin/linux
>> >>
>> >> Thanks!
>> >>
>> >> Roberto.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>

Re: mod_jk.so differences

[Roberto B.]

I use Debian...

R.

- Original Message - 
From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences


> If you using Linux, may I propose you take a look
> at my RPMs :
> 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/rpms/
> 
> -
> Henri Gomez ___[_]
> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) 
> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 
> 
> 
> 
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:12 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
> >
> >
> >sorry.. now I have understood!!
> >but where I find mod_jk for Linux for Tomcat 3.2.3??
> >
> >Thanks!
> >R.
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Roberto B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:07 AM
> >Subject: mod_jk.so differences
> >
> >
> >> I used Tomcat 4 with Apache but I have not found nobody that 
> >said to me
> >how
> >> to create virtual host... so I installed Tomcat 3.2.3
> >> I have do get mod_jk.so but...what are the differences 
> >between the file
> >in:
> >>
> >> builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.1.1/bin/linux/i386
> >>
> >> and those in:
> >>
> >> builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/bin/linux
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Roberto.
> >>
> >>
> >

RE: mod_jk.so differences

[GOMEZ Henri]

If you using Linux, may I propose you take a look
at my RPMs :

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/rpms/

-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) 
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-Original Message-
>From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:12 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
>
>
>sorry.. now I have understood!!
>but where I find mod_jk for Linux for Tomcat 3.2.3??
>
>Thanks!
>R.
>- Original Message -
>From: "Roberto B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:07 AM
>Subject: mod_jk.so differences
>
>
>> I used Tomcat 4 with Apache but I have not found nobody that 
>said to me
>how
>> to create virtual host... so I installed Tomcat 3.2.3
>> I have do get mod_jk.so but...what are the differences 
>between the file
>in:
>>
>> builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.1.1/bin/linux/i386
>>
>> and those in:
>>
>> builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/bin/linux
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Roberto.
>>
>>
>

Re: mod_jk.so differences

[Roberto B.]

sorry.. now I have understood!!
but where I find mod_jk for Linux for Tomcat 3.2.3??

Thanks!
R.
- Original Message -
From: "Roberto B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:07 AM
Subject: mod_jk.so differences


> I used Tomcat 4 with Apache but I have not found nobody that said to me
how
> to create virtual host... so I installed Tomcat 3.2.3
> I have do get mod_jk.so but...what are the differences between the file
in:
>
> builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.1.1/bin/linux/i386
>
> and those in:
>
> builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.3/bin/linux
>
> Thanks!
>
> Roberto.
>
>

Re: mod_jk.so + apache

[Yann Sagon]

Le Mercredi 15 Août 2001 22:47, vous avez écrit :
> I place mod_jk.so in my /etc/httpd/modules directory and then used
> LoadModule jk_module  modules/mod_jk.so
>
> in httpd.conf.  Either case, check where your mod_jk.so file is and set the
> LoadModule directive to it.  Either absolute or relative path to /etc/httpd
> should work.
>
> I'm also on a Mandrake 8 box, so individual OS and/or Apache install
> mileage may very.
>

Hi,
Yes, I've checked it. If I give a wrong path, apache complains about it. So 
it doesn't seems to be that.

Yann Sagon

Re: mod_jk.so + apache

[David Smith]

I place mod_jk.so in my /etc/httpd/modules directory and then used
LoadModule jk_modulemodules/mod_jk.so

in httpd.conf.  Either case, check where your mod_jk.so file is and set the 
LoadModule directive to it.  Either absolute or relative path to /etc/httpd 
should work.

I'm also on a Mandrake 8 box, so individual OS and/or Apache install mileage 
may very.

--David Smith

On Tuesday 14 August 2001 09:09 pm, you wrote:
> >My probleme:
> >when I try to start apache:
> >
> >#apachectl start
> >Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 774 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
> >Invalid command 'JkMount', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module
> >not included in the server configuration
> >[FAILED]
> >
> >Thank you
> >
> >Yann Sagon
>
> you have this line in your httpd.conf -
> LoadModule jk_module  libexec/mod_jk.so
>
> maybe it should be -
> LoadModule jk_module  /etc/httpd/libexec/mod_jk.so
>
> I'm just as new to this as you are so I'm probably wrong :)

Re: mod_jk.so + apache

[Yann Sagon]

Jonathon Wallen a écrit :
> 
> >
> >My probleme:
Thanks but no, it doesn't change something.

> you have this line in your httpd.conf -
> LoadModule jk_module  libexec/mod_jk.so
> 
> maybe it should be -
> LoadModule jk_module  /etc/httpd/libexec/mod_jk.so
> 
> I'm just as new to this as you are so I'm probably wrong :)

Re: mod_jk.so + apache

[Yann Sagon]

matt a écrit :
> 
> how did you know you wanted the eapi mod_jk rather than non?

I didn't know.

I've tried with both of them.
With the noeapi, apache don't start.

I'm using Mandrake, so I guess that they use an enhanced version of
apache.

Yann Sagon

Re: mod_jk.so + apache

[Bernard T. Higonnet]

Yann Sagon wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm very new to tomcat + apache.
> 
> I've dowmloaded tomcat 3.2.3 and mod_jk.so (eapi)
> I'v installed tomcat as a standalone version without problem.
> 
> Now, I want to use it with apache and some virtual hosts.


In case you aren't a French native speaker, write back for a translation!

Moi j'ai installé mod_jk.so (trouvé suite à votre indication) dans un 
serveur Apache 1.3.19 avec deux serveurs virtuels.

J'ai utilisé le mod_jk.conf-auto produit par Tomcat, et après avoir 
pataugé un peu pour donner de bonnes valeurs à "Alias" pour définir la 
racine de  la zone servlets j'ai pu exécuter les exemples, 
ostensiblement sans problème à travers Apache.

Chose curieuse, mod_jk.conf-auto ne comporte pas de ligne "AddModule 
mod_jk.c".

Hope this helps, and thanks for your previous answer.

BTH
-- 
   BT Higonnet
   22 rue Nicolo
75116 Paris

Re: mod_jk.so + apache

[Jonathon Wallen]

>
>My probleme:
>when I try to start apache:
>
>#apachectl start
>Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 774 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
>Invalid command 'JkMount', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module
>not included in the server configuration
>[FAILED]
>
>Thank you
>
>Yann Sagon

you have this line in your httpd.conf -
LoadModule jk_module  libexec/mod_jk.so

maybe it should be -
LoadModule jk_module  /etc/httpd/libexec/mod_jk.so

I'm just as new to this as you are so I'm probably wrong :)
-- 

- 
- Jonathon Wallen
- B,DES College of Fine Arts, UNSW
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- 

Re: mod_jk.so + apache

[matt]

how did you know you wanted the eapi mod_jk rather than non?

RE: mod_jk.so unable to compile, please help. Urgent

[Nance, Michael]

Edit the apxs and make sure the path to your apahce is correct (It is hard
coded)
I have a compiled mod_jk.so (but it is for a specific version of Apache)

try using this command to compile (youll have to change the path to your
apahce)

/opt/pokemon/lib/server/apache/1.3.12+ssl_0.95-solaris2.70/bin/apxs -o
mod_jk.so -DSOLARIS -I../jk -I/usr/java/include -I/usr/java/include/solaris
-lposix4 -c *.c ../jk/*.c

-Original Message-
From: raghu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 7:01 AM
To: tomcat
Subject: mod_jk.so unable to compile, please help. Urgent



../jk/jk_jni_worker.c:67: jni.h: No such file or directory
../jk/jk_jni_worker.c:770: warning:
#warning ---

../jk/jk_jni_worker.c:771: warning: #warning NO JAVA 2 HEADERS! SUPPORT FOR
JAVA
 2 FEATURES DISABLED
../jk/jk_jni_worker.c:772: warning:
#warning ---

apxs:Break: Command failed with rc=1

"black holes are,
when GOD is dividing by zero"

Re: mod_jk.so unable to compile, please help. Urgent

[Beth Kelly]

Funny signature!

Kyle Wayne Kelly
(504)391-3985
http://www.cs.uno.edu/~kkelly
- Original Message -
From: "raghu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tomcat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 7:01 AM
Subject: mod_jk.so unable to compile, please help. Urgent


>
> ../jk/jk_jni_worker.c:67: jni.h: No such file or directory
> ../jk/jk_jni_worker.c:770: warning:
> #warning ---
> 
> ../jk/jk_jni_worker.c:771: warning: #warning NO JAVA 2 HEADERS! SUPPORT
FOR
> JAVA
>  2 FEATURES DISABLED
> ../jk/jk_jni_worker.c:772: warning:
> #warning ---
> 
> apxs:Break: Command failed with rc=1
>
> "black holes are,
> when GOD is dividing by zero"
>

RE: mod_jk.so for linux

[Yudhy Fajar]

unsubscribe me please ...




DISCLAIMER :
The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the use of the 
individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it.   It 
may contain confidential or legally privileged information.   If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,  distribution 
or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. Unless otherwise specifically stated by the sender, 
any documents or views presented are solely those of the sender and do not constitute 
official documents or views of  The Indonesian Bank Restructuring Agency (IBRA). 
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
responding to this email and then delete it from your system. IBRA is neither liable 
for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this 
communication nor for any delay in its receipt.

Re: mod_jk.so for linux

[Adam Fowler]

Hi,

How many times do I have to post this in one week??? 8o)

http://willow.cc.edu/adminguide
http://users.aber.ac.uk/aff9

or for a list of builds of mod_jk I have:-
http://users.aber.ac.uk/aff9/tomcat/tomcat-3.2/

JDK 1.3.0 can be found at
http://users.aber.ac.uk/pms

Adam.

 
Adam Fowler 
Help Desk Live Project 
Information Services 
University of Wales, Aberystwyth 
Web guy+author on the TomcatBook Project 
http://tomcatbook.sourceforge.net 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 

On Thursday 19 July 2001 20:50, you wrote:
> Lally, Keith R wrote:
> > Where does one get the mod_jk.so binary for linux?
>
> This is the only one I could find:
>
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.1/bin/linux/i3
>86/mod_jk.so
>
> although I think I tried this one and it didn't work. Ended up compiling
> it from source, which (I think) is included with Tomcat source.
>
> John

-- 

Re: mod_jk.so for linux

[John Hebert]

Lally, Keith R wrote:

> Where does one get the mod_jk.so binary for linux?


This is the only one I could find:


http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.1/bin/linux/i386/mod_jk.so

although I think I tried this one and it didn't work. Ended up compiling 
it from source, which (I think) is included with Tomcat source.

John

-- 
John Alex Hebert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Engineer

Re: mod_jk.so-eapi vs mod_jk.so-noeapi

[Vinay Menon]

Crystal clear now! I was wondering what the files were because the last time
I got the mod_jk file there was just one of them lying around!

Many thanks to all who replied.

Vinay
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Kilbride" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:46 AM
Subject: Fw: mod_jk.so-eapi vs mod_jk.so-noeapi


> Hi Vinay,
>
> EAPI means "extended API". You'll need to use mod_jk.so-eapi if you are
> using Apache with mod_ssl for SSL (https) support. If you are not using
> mod_ssl, you can use the mod_jk.so-noeapi.
>
> Thanks,
> --jeff
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Vinay Menon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Tomcat Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tomcat User"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 2:27 PM
> > Subject: mod_jk.so-eapi vs mod_jk.so-noeapi
> >
> >
> > > What exactly are these 2 so's? Why 2 of them and which one should one
> use?
> > >
> > > Would appreciate if somebody could let me know!
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Vinay
> > >
> >
>

RE: mod_jk.so-eapi vs mod_jk.so-noeapi

[GOMEZ Henri]

mod_ssl only.

EAPI is an extension to std apache api introduced
by mod_ssl author

-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) 
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-Original Message-
>From: Ryan Worley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 10:32 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: mod_jk.so-eapi vs mod_jk.so-noeapi
>
>
>When you say EAPI (mod_ssl), do you mean if apache is using mod_ssl
>specifically or if apache is compiled with any non-standard libraries
>(mod_so for example)?
>
>Ryan
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:00 AM
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so-eapi vs mod_jk.so-noeapi
>
>
>> mod_jk.so-eapi is to be used when your apache is using EAPI (mod_ssl)
>> mod_jk.so-noeapi when using plain std Apache
>

Re: mod_jk.so-eapi vs mod_jk.so-noeapi

[Ryan Worley]

When you say EAPI (mod_ssl), do you mean if apache is using mod_ssl
specifically or if apache is compiled with any non-standard libraries
(mod_so for example)?

Ryan


- Original Message -
From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:00 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so-eapi vs mod_jk.so-noeapi


> mod_jk.so-eapi is to be used when your apache is using EAPI (mod_ssl)
> mod_jk.so-noeapi when using plain std Apache

RE: mod_jk.so-eapi vs mod_jk.so-noeapi

[GOMEZ Henri]

mod_jk.so-eapi is to be used when your apache is using EAPI (mod_ssl)
mod_jk.so-noeapi when using plain std Apache

:)


-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) 
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-Original Message-
>From: Vinay Menon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:28 PM
>To: Tomcat Dev; Tomcat User
>Subject: mod_jk.so-eapi vs mod_jk.so-noeapi
>
>
>What exactly are these 2 so's? Why 2 of them and which one 
>should one use?
>
>Would appreciate if somebody could let me know!
>
>Thanks
>
>Vinay
>

Re: mod_jk.so for LINUX

[Pier Paolo Bortone]

Gomez,
I have found docs about the argument on TC 3.3 but not on 3.2.

BTW thanks now I have understood.

Pier Paolo.

- Original Message - 
From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 3:02 PM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for LINUX


> >is there someone that knows why exists two files mod_jk.so (-eapi and
> -noeapi) for LINUX? 
> 
> I'm updating the mod_jk doc on TC 3.2/3.3/J-T-C
> 
> 
> >Which do I have to use? Do I have to cut the word after '.so'?
> 
> If you have an Apache with EAPI (ie mod_ssl) use mod_jk.so-eapi
> and rename to mod_jk.so

RE: mod_jk.so for LINUX

[GOMEZ Henri]

>is there someone that knows why exists two files mod_jk.so (-eapi and
-noeapi) for LINUX? 

I'm updating the mod_jk doc on TC 3.2/3.3/J-T-C


>Which do I have to use? Do I have to cut the word after '.so'?

If you have an Apache with EAPI (ie mod_ssl) use mod_jk.so-eapi
and rename to mod_jk.so 

RE: mod_jk.so kills apache 1.3.19 on tru64 v5.1

[GOMEZ Henri]

>Do I need jni in mod_jk? 

Even if you didn't need the jni worker, you need to have it 
compiled in mod_jk. 

May be something to reworked in jakarta-tomcat-connector.

>I've managed to get tomcat, apache, and mod_jk running without 
>any problems on a 
>solaris 8 box. Getting it all to work on a Tru64 UNIX has so 
>far proven to be a 
>no go. I can get tomcat and apache working but not all 3.

Could you send me a copy of  /usr/opt/java130/include/jni.h ?

>Stewart
>
>>Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
>run by ezmlm
>>list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so kills apache 1.3.19 on tru64 v5.1
>>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:16:14 +0200
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N
>>
>>>Henri, I've been trying to use libpthread because when I try 
>>>and build mod_jk 
>>>with apxs on Tru64 UNIX v5.1 I get the following error:
>>>
>>>cc: Error: /usr/opt/java130/include/jni.h, line 35: #error 
>>>"Modules that 
>>>interface with Java must be compiled and linked with the 
>>>-pthread option)
>>
>>A known problem with jni. If you didn't use jni in mod_jk
>>you didn't need pthread
>
>--
>Stewart Mclean
>UNIX Support Group
>Information Management Services
>Curtin University of Technology
>GPO Box U1987
>Perth 6845
>Ph: (08) 9266 7495
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>The manual said install Windows 98 or better.
>.so I installed Linux!
>
>
>and yes, my password is the same as my dog's name. My 
>dog's name is 
>4%&12ab!! but I change it every week. Sure does confuse the 
>hell out of my dog!
>
>

RE: mod_jk.so kills apache 1.3.19 on tru64 v5.1

[Stewart Mclean]

Do I need jni in mod_jk? 

I've managed to get tomcat, apache, and mod_jk running without any problems on a 
solaris 8 box. Getting it all to work on a Tru64 UNIX has so far proven to be a 
no go. I can get tomcat and apache working but not all 3.

Stewart

>Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
>list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so kills apache 1.3.19 on tru64 v5.1
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:16:14 +0200
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N
>
>>Henri, I've been trying to use libpthread because when I try 
>>and build mod_jk 
>>with apxs on Tru64 UNIX v5.1 I get the following error:
>>
>>cc: Error: /usr/opt/java130/include/jni.h, line 35: #error 
>>"Modules that 
>>interface with Java must be compiled and linked with the 
>>-pthread option)
>
>A known problem with jni. If you didn't use jni in mod_jk
>you didn't need pthread

--
Stewart Mclean
UNIX Support Group
Information Management Services
Curtin University of Technology
GPO Box U1987
Perth 6845
Ph: (08) 9266 7495
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The manual said install Windows 98 or better.
.so I installed Linux!


and yes, my password is the same as my dog's name. My dog's name is 
4%&12ab!! but I change it every week. Sure does confuse the hell out of my dog!

RE: mod_jk.so kills apache 1.3.19 on tru64 v5.1

[GOMEZ Henri]

>Henri, I've been trying to use libpthread because when I try 
>and build mod_jk 
>with apxs on Tru64 UNIX v5.1 I get the following error:
>
>cc: Error: /usr/opt/java130/include/jni.h, line 35: #error 
>"Modules that 
>interface with Java must be compiled and linked with the 
>-pthread option)

A known problem with jni. If you didn't use jni in mod_jk
you didn't need pthread

RE: mod_jk.so kills apache 1.3.19 on tru64 v5.1

[Stewart Mclean]

Henri, I've been trying to use libpthread because when I try and build mod_jk 
with apxs on Tru64 UNIX v5.1 I get the following error:

cc: Error: /usr/opt/java130/include/jni.h, line 35: #error "Modules that 
interface with Java must be compiled and linked with the -pthread option)

apxs then bombs out.

Any suggestions?

Stewart.

>Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
>list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so kills apache 1.3.19 on tru64 v5.1
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:27:58 +0200
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N
>
>There is no need to build mod_jk with libpthread under Apache 1.3.19
>The pthread stuff is required 'ONLY' in threaded mode, ie Apache 2.0
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Stewart Mclean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 4:59 AM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: mod_jk.so kills apache 1.3.19 on tru64 v5.1
>>
>>
>>Hi guys, can anyone help me with running tomcat 3.2.2 and 
>>apache 1.3.19 with 
>>mod_jk.so on a Alpha box running Tru64 v5.1? So far I managed 
>>to successfully 
>>compile and link mod_jk.so with the libpthread.so library but 
>>when I try to 
>>start apache with mod_jk.so apache dies straight away with the 
>>following message
>>in apache's error log file:
>>
>>Syntax error on line 355 of /opt/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
>>Cannot load /opt/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so into server: dlopen: 
>>libpthread.so: 
>>symbol "pthread_setcancelstate" unresolved
>>
>>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>Thanks in advance,
>>Stewart.
>>
>>--
>>Stewart Mclean
>>UNIX Support Group
>>Information Management Services
>>Curtin University of Technology
>>GPO Box U1987
>>Perth 6845
>>Ph: (08) 9266 7495
>>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>The manual said install Windows 98 or better.
>>.so I installed Linux!
>>
>>
>>and yes, my password is the same as my dog's name. My 
>>dog's name is 
>>4%&12ab!! but I change it every week. Sure does confuse the 
>>hell out of my dog!
>>
>>

--
Stewart Mclean
UNIX Support Group
Information Management Services
Curtin University of Technology
GPO Box U1987
Perth 6845
Ph: (08) 9266 7495
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The manual said install Windows 98 or better.
.so I installed Linux!


and yes, my password is the same as my dog's name. My dog's name is 
4%&12ab!! but I change it every week. Sure does confuse the hell out of my dog!

RE: mod_jk.so kills apache 1.3.19 on tru64 v5.1

[GOMEZ Henri]

There is no need to build mod_jk with libpthread under Apache 1.3.19
The pthread stuff is required 'ONLY' in threaded mode, ie Apache 2.0


>-Original Message-
>From: Stewart Mclean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 4:59 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: mod_jk.so kills apache 1.3.19 on tru64 v5.1
>
>
>Hi guys, can anyone help me with running tomcat 3.2.2 and 
>apache 1.3.19 with 
>mod_jk.so on a Alpha box running Tru64 v5.1? So far I managed 
>to successfully 
>compile and link mod_jk.so with the libpthread.so library but 
>when I try to 
>start apache with mod_jk.so apache dies straight away with the 
>following message
>in apache's error log file:
>
>Syntax error on line 355 of /opt/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
>Cannot load /opt/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so into server: dlopen: 
>libpthread.so: 
>symbol "pthread_setcancelstate" unresolved
>
>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Stewart.
>
>--
>Stewart Mclean
>UNIX Support Group
>Information Management Services
>Curtin University of Technology
>GPO Box U1987
>Perth 6845
>Ph: (08) 9266 7495
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>The manual said install Windows 98 or better.
>.so I installed Linux!
>
>
>and yes, my password is the same as my dog's name. My 
>dog's name is 
>4%&12ab!! but I change it every week. Sure does confuse the 
>hell out of my dog!
>
>

RE: mod_jk.so linking/compiling problem.

[Kevin Shortt]

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 12:10 PM

>   Try it with
> gcc -shared -o mod_jk.so *.o -lposix4
> that worked for me on Solaris 8 x86.


nope. no good either.
I did notice more output though, because the first couple of times if spit
past my buffer I used
script to capture my run.
Here is the newer stuff:


gcc -DSOLARIS2=270 -DMOD_SSL=208102 -DEAPI -DUSE_EXPAT -I../lib/expat-lite -
DNO_DL_NEEDED  -I/usr/loca
l/apache/include -I../jk -I/usr/java/include -I/usr/java/include/solaris  -c
mod_jk.c
In file included from ../jk/jk_util.h:66,
 from mod_jk.c:90:
../jk/jk_pool.h:116: parse error before `jk_pool_atom_t'
mod_jk.c: In function `jk_handler':
mod_jk.c:679: `jk_pool_atom_t' undeclared (first use in this function)
mod_jk.c:679: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
mod_jk.c:679: for each function it appears in.)
mod_jk.c:679: parse error before `buf'
mod_jk.c:680: `buf' undeclared (first use in this function)

Re: mod_jk.so linking/compiling problem.

[Steve Brunton]

Kevin Shortt wrote:
> 
> 
> Then I've done this:
> gcc -shared -o mod_jk.so *.o
> And recieved this:
> ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but 
>non-writable
> sections
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status


  Try it with 

gcc -shared -o mod_jk.so *.o -lposix4

that worked for me on Solaris 8 x86.


-- 
Steve Brunton   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Phone: 404-827-2756
Chief Engineer Enterprise SystemsOne CNN Center, Atlanta GA
CNN Internet Technologies  ICBM: 84W 23' 45" 33N 45' 29"
<*> A bartender is just a pharmacist with a limited inventory. <*>

Re: Mod_jk.so

[Martin Mauri]

Yes, that's a problem most of us had to overcame.

Means that the module was compiled in a diferent platform than yours, you'll
have to download the source code of mod_jk and compile it.

hth,

m-

> Hello,
> I have compiled Tomcat from the source on RH 7.0 and now I am getting the
> following error:
>
> API module structure `jk_module' in file /usr/lib/apache/mod_jk.so is
> garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
>
> So then I removed it and have sine recompiled it but I am still getting
the
> same error. Any assistance would be great.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Stuart

RE: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?

[GOMEZ Henri]

If you have an Apache with EAPI you may have also installed
mod_ssl. But did you have th rigth apxs installed ?

-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) 
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-Original Message-
>From: Arne Borkowski (borko.net) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 2:25 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?
>
>
>Hi,
>
>I am using Apache 1.3.12 under RedHat 6.1 ... I tried to give -DEAPI
>with the apxs command that build mod_jk.so but that didn't help.
>
>Any clue?
>
>Regards, Arne
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Pae Choi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 1:26 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?
>> 
>> 
>> Which version of Apache/HTTPD server are you using?
>> 
>> 
>> Pae
>> 
>>  
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Arne Borkowski (borko.net) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Monday, April 09, 2001 3:35 PM
>> Subject: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?
>> 
>> 
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >I tried to compile Jakarta mod_jk.so for Apache with EAPI
>> >support, but failed. Does any of you know where I have to
>> >place the -DEAPI option to compile it?
>> >
>> >Regards, Arne Borkowski
>> >Hamburg/Germany
>> 
>

Re: mod_jk.so vs mod_jk.dll for Win32 and Apache 1.3.19

[eric leung]

I have the same doubt, i use 1.3.17. Why on win32 now,
all module has .so ending?  what i think is .so is for
unix only. am i right?


--- Ellis Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I currently use Apache1.3.14 + Tomcat 3.2.1 +
> mod_jk.dll on Win32.
>  
> I recently tried to upgrade to Apache 1.3.19.  When
> I try the LoadModule
> command in the server configuration file on mod_jk
> using the mod_jk.dll file the server would not
> start.  If I comment out that one LoadModule command
> the server starts.
>  
> I noticed in the Win32 version ALL the modules now
> have .so endings.  Is this a change in the Win32
> version.  Do I need a mod_jk.so or different
> mod_jk.dll file for Win32?
>  
> -Ellis Teer
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

RE: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?

[Arne Borkowski \(borko.net\)]

Hi,

I am using Apache 1.3.12 under RedHat 6.1 ... I tried to give -DEAPI
with the apxs command that build mod_jk.so but that didn't help.

Any clue?

Regards, Arne



> -Original Message-
> From: Pae Choi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 1:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?
> 
> 
> Which version of Apache/HTTPD server are you using?
> 
> 
> Pae
> 
>  
> -Original Message-
> From: Arne Borkowski (borko.net) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Monday, April 09, 2001 3:35 PM
> Subject: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?
> 
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >I tried to compile Jakarta mod_jk.so for Apache with EAPI
> >support, but failed. Does any of you know where I have to
> >place the -DEAPI option to compile it?
> >
> >Regards, Arne Borkowski
> >Hamburg/Germany
> 
 smime.p7s

Re: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?

[Pae Choi]

Which version of Apache/HTTPD server are you using?


Pae

 
-Original Message-
From: Arne Borkowski (borko.net) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, April 09, 2001 3:35 PM
Subject: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?


>Hi,
>
>I tried to compile Jakarta mod_jk.so for Apache with EAPI
>support, but failed. Does any of you know where I have to
>place the -DEAPI option to compile it?
>
>Regards, Arne Borkowski
>Hamburg/Germany

RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux Redhat 6.2- required **

[Benoit Jacquemont]

Hi,

I don't see any problem in your workers.properties file, but in your
httpd.conf you're including the tomcat-auto conf file. I had a lot of
problem with that file until I paste the content into the httpd.conf and I
customize it. I really think that dispatching your configuration in several
files is not a good idea. It makes difficult to find errors.

Benoit

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the immeediate response.
>
> I'd configured the workers.properties and httpd.conf for the same.
>
> I'm sending you the same  can you please tell me what more
> changes i need
> to make
>
> (See attached file: workers.properties)(See attached file: httpd.conf)
>
> Awaiting for an early response.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Prashanth Marathe D
> Phone: 667-8355 Ext.: 262
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> __
>
>
> What kind of changes have you made on your worker.properties file ?
>
> Did you customize it to suit your needs ?
>
> You shoud also have a look on your httpd.conf to see wether
> your configured
> your workers or not.
>
> Benoit
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've first downloaded the same from the link and got the
> > error "garbled ".
> >
> > so  then i made my own mod_jk.so and now I'm getting the
> > following error
> >
> > Apache:error_log says
> > Tue Apr  3 12:42:41 2001] [emerg] (2)No such file or
> > directory: Error while
> > opening the workers
> >
> > Tomcat : mod_jk.log says
> > [jk_ajp12_worker.c (201)]: In jk_worker_t::validate, resolve failed
> > [jk_ajp12_worker.c (203)]: In jk_worker_t::validate, Error
> > localhost 8007
> > [jk_worker.c (164)]: wc_create_worker validate failed for ajp12
> > [jk_worker.c (229)]: build_worker_map failed to create workerajp12
> >
> > Waiting for a early response.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Prashanth Marathe D
> > Phone: 667-8355 Ext.: 262
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Benoit Jacquemont
> >
> >  > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > @smile.fr>cc:
> >
> >   Subject:
> > RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux Redhat
> > 04/03/01 03:32 PM 6.2- required
> > **
> > Please respond to
> >
> > tomcat-user
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > You can get one from the jakarta web site:
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.1
> /bin/linux/i38
>
> 6/mod_jk.so
>
> I use Tomcat 3.2.1.
> This version of the mod_jk worked for me with a Apache
> 1.3.12, and when I
> installed a Apache 1.3.19, it was said 'garbled', and I had to build a
> mod_jk.so. But building it under Linux is really painless and I get a
> working version in less than 1 minute.
>
> Benoit
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > OS: Linux Redhat ver 6.1
> > Apache ver-1.3.14
> > Tom Cat ver-3.2.1
> > Required file: mod_jk.so
> > If anyone has this file, could you please send us?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Prashanth Marathe D
> > Phone: 667-8355 Ext.: 262
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>

RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux Redhat 6.2- required **

[Prashantha . Marathe]

Hi,

Thanks for the immeediate response.

I'd configured the workers.properties and httpd.conf for the same.

I'm sending you the same  can you please tell me what more changes i need
to make

(See attached file: workers.properties)(See attached file: httpd.conf)

Awaiting for an early response.

Thanks and Regards,
Prashanth Marathe D
Phone: 667-8355 Ext.: 262
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__


What kind of changes have you made on your worker.properties file ?

Did you customize it to suit your needs ?

You shoud also have a look on your httpd.conf to see wether your configured
your workers or not.

Benoit

> Hi,
>
> I've first downloaded the same from the link and got the
> error "garbled ".
>
> so  then i made my own mod_jk.so and now I'm getting the
> following error
>
> Apache:error_log says
> Tue Apr  3 12:42:41 2001] [emerg] (2)No such file or
> directory: Error while
> opening the workers
>
> Tomcat : mod_jk.log says
> [jk_ajp12_worker.c (201)]: In jk_worker_t::validate, resolve failed
> [jk_ajp12_worker.c (203)]: In jk_worker_t::validate, Error
> localhost 8007
> [jk_worker.c (164)]: wc_create_worker validate failed for ajp12
> [jk_worker.c (229)]: build_worker_map failed to create workerajp12
>
> Waiting for a early response.
>
> Regards,
> Prashanth Marathe D
> Phone: 667-8355 Ext.: 262
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> Benoit Jacquemont
>
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> @smile.fr>cc:
>
>   Subject:
> RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux Redhat
> 04/03/01 03:32 PM 6.2- required
> **
> Please respond to
>
> tomcat-user
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> You can get one from the jakarta web site:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.1
/bin/linux/i38

6/mod_jk.so

I use Tomcat 3.2.1.
This version of the mod_jk worked for me with a Apache 1.3.12, and when I
installed a Apache 1.3.19, it was said 'garbled', and I had to build a
mod_jk.so. But building it under Linux is really painless and I get a
working version in less than 1 minute.

Benoit

> Hi,
>
> OS: Linux Redhat ver 6.1
> Apache ver-1.3.14
> Tom Cat ver-3.2.1
> Required file: mod_jk.so
> If anyone has this file, could you please send us?
>
> Regards,
> Prashanth Marathe D
> Phone: 667-8355 Ext.: 262
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 workers.properties
 httpd.conf

RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux Redhat 6.2- required **

[Benoit Jacquemont]

What kind of changes have you made on your worker.properties file ?

Did you customize it to suit your needs ?

You shoud also have a look on your httpd.conf to see wether your configured
your workers or not.

Benoit

> Hi,
>
> I've first downloaded the same from the link and got the
> error "garbled ".
>
> so  then i made my own mod_jk.so and now I'm getting the
> following error
>
> Apache:error_log says
> Tue Apr  3 12:42:41 2001] [emerg] (2)No such file or
> directory: Error while
> opening the workers
>
> Tomcat : mod_jk.log says
> [jk_ajp12_worker.c (201)]: In jk_worker_t::validate, resolve failed
> [jk_ajp12_worker.c (203)]: In jk_worker_t::validate, Error
> localhost 8007
> [jk_worker.c (164)]: wc_create_worker validate failed for ajp12
> [jk_worker.c (229)]: build_worker_map failed to create workerajp12
>
> Waiting for a early response.
>
> Regards,
> Prashanth Marathe D
> Phone: 667-8355 Ext.: 262
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> Benoit Jacquemont
>
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> @smile.fr>cc:
>
>   Subject:
> RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux Redhat
> 04/03/01 03:32 PM 6.2- required
> **
> Please respond to
>
> tomcat-user
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> You can get one from the jakarta web site:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.1
/bin/linux/i38

6/mod_jk.so

I use Tomcat 3.2.1.
This version of the mod_jk worked for me with a Apache 1.3.12, and when I
installed a Apache 1.3.19, it was said 'garbled', and I had to build a
mod_jk.so. But building it under Linux is really painless and I get a
working version in less than 1 minute.

Benoit

> Hi,
>
> OS: Linux Redhat ver 6.1
> Apache ver-1.3.14
> Tom Cat ver-3.2.1
> Required file: mod_jk.so
> If anyone has this file, could you please send us?
>
> Regards,
> Prashanth Marathe D
> Phone: 667-8355 Ext.: 262
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux Redhat 6.2- required **

[Prashantha . Marathe]

Hi,

I've first downloaded the same from the link and got the error "garbled ".

so  then i made my own mod_jk.so and now I'm getting the following error

Apache:error_log says
Tue Apr  3 12:42:41 2001] [emerg] (2)No such file or directory: Error while
opening the workers

Tomcat : mod_jk.log says
[jk_ajp12_worker.c (201)]: In jk_worker_t::validate, resolve failed
[jk_ajp12_worker.c (203)]: In jk_worker_t::validate, Error localhost 8007
[jk_worker.c (164)]: wc_create_worker validate failed for ajp12
[jk_worker.c (229)]: build_worker_map failed to create workerajp12

Waiting for a early response.

Regards,
Prashanth Marathe D
Phone: 667-8355 Ext.: 262
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


   
 
Benoit Jacquemont  
 
 
 
@smile.fr>cc:  
 
      Subject: RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux 
Redhat
04/03/01 03:32 PM 6.2- required ** 
 
Please respond to  
 
tomcat-user
 
   
 
   
 



Hi,

You can get one from the jakarta web site:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.1/bin/linux/i38

6/mod_jk.so

I use Tomcat 3.2.1.
This version of the mod_jk worked for me with a Apache 1.3.12, and when I
installed a Apache 1.3.19, it was said 'garbled', and I had to build a
mod_jk.so. But building it under Linux is really painless and I get a
working version in less than 1 minute.

Benoit

> Hi,
>
> OS: Linux Redhat ver 6.1
> Apache ver-1.3.14
> Tom Cat ver-3.2.1
> Required file: mod_jk.so
> If anyone has this file, could you please send us?
>
> Regards,
> Prashanth Marathe D
> Phone: 667-8355 Ext.: 262
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux Redhat 6.2- required **

[Benoit Jacquemont]

Hi,

You can get one from the jakarta web site:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.1/bin/linux/i38
6/mod_jk.so

I use Tomcat 3.2.1.
This version of the mod_jk worked for me with a Apache 1.3.12, and when I
installed a Apache 1.3.19, it was said 'garbled', and I had to build a
mod_jk.so. But building it under Linux is really painless and I get a
working version in less than 1 minute.

Benoit

> Hi,
>
> OS: Linux Redhat ver 6.1
> Apache ver-1.3.14
> Tom Cat ver-3.2.1
> Required file: mod_jk.so
> If anyone has this file, could you please send us?
>
> Regards,
> Prashanth Marathe D
> Phone: 667-8355 Ext.: 262
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ** mod_jk.so for Linux Redhat 6.2- help required **

[Prashantha . Marathe]

Hi,

I am trying to configure Tomcat+Apache on Linux after building my
mod_jk.so. I am having some problems
while configuring the same.

Please help resolving following problem.

Apache:error_log says
Tue Apr  3 12:42:41 2001] [emerg] (2)No such file or directory: Error while
opening the workers

Tomcat : mod_jk.log says
[jk_ajp12_worker.c (201)]: In jk_worker_t::validate, resolve failed
[jk_ajp12_worker.c (203)]: In jk_worker_t::validate, Error localhost 8007
[jk_worker.c (164)]: wc_create_worker validate failed for ajp12
[jk_worker.c (229)]: build_worker_map failed to create workerajp12

Waiting for a early response.

Regards,
Prashanth Marathe D


   

unplug 

  cc:   

 Subject: Re: ** mod_jk.so for Linux 
Redhat
04/03/01 6.2- required **  

03:23 PM   

Please 

respond to 

tomcat-user

   

   




I think it is more suitable to build your own one.
Follow the instruction of the tomcat document.
Just remind you that the source of mod_jserv is under
TOMCAT_SRC_DIR/src/native/apache/jserv

unplug

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> OS: Linux Redhat ver 6.1
> Apache ver-1.3.14
> Tom Cat ver-3.2.1
> Required file: mod_jk.so
> If anyone has this file, could you please send us?
>
> Regards,
> Prashanth Marathe D
> Phone: 667-8355 Ext.: 262
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]