Troubleshooting Virtual Hosts with Tomcat 5 standalone mode...
I'm trying to setup a couple of virtual hosts using Tomcat in stand alone mode. I'm having a hell of a time to get this working correctly. I've tried several configs, but they all fail. I started with the goal of having a user directory for each virtual host. For example, for the sample domain1.com the appbase would be /home/domain/webapps. I setup my server.xml file to have the following host settings Host name=domain1.com debug=0 appBase=/home/domain/webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false Context path= docBase=./ /host This is pretty much cut and past from Tomcat: The Definitive Guide from Safari Online. This did not work. I would get just get a blank webpage. I then tried to update the host file. I didn't see why I'd need to do that since my DNS setup at Mydomain.com was working for ssh. I add domain1.com to the line for my localhost. I restarted Tomcat. No change. I am able to run the system on port 80 using just the localhost default settings. I figured I just did something wrong. I switched to this directions http://www.ex-parrot.com/~pete/tomcat-vhost.html This didn't worked either. When I looked at the requests in in Safari, it showed this as a bad request. I can telnet domain1.com 80. When I try GET index.jsp or index,html or /. Nothing happens. No error. It just closed the connection as if everything was working fine. I tried lynx from the server prompt. It gives a http 400 error, I think. It flashes by so fast I'm not sure. The catalina.out has no errors. I have my DNS setup via mydomain.com dns management tool. I have my A record pointing to the address. I don't think I need to do anything else. I'm at a loss of what to do now to troubleshoot this problem. I searched the mail list and the website nothing has jumped out at me. So, I hoping some kind soul might give me some pointers. What kills me is I'm sure this is something obvious I missed or not seeing. Thanks, Jeff Duska [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Troubleshooting Virtual Hosts with Tomcat 5 standalone mode...
This is in my server.xml the directory is webapps/by-m. It works also on a linux box. It is inside the engine. Host name=by-m debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false Context path= docBase=by-m debug=5 reloadable=true /Context /Host - Original Message - From: Jeff Duska [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 7:45 PM Subject: Troubleshooting Virtual Hosts with Tomcat 5 standalone mode... I'm trying to setup a couple of virtual hosts using Tomcat in stand alone mode. I'm having a hell of a time to get this working correctly. I've tried several configs, but they all fail. I started with the goal of having a user directory for each virtual host. For example, for the sample domain1.com the appbase would be /home/domain/webapps. I setup my server.xml file to have the following host settings Host name=domain1.com debug=0 appBase=/home/domain/webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false Context path= docBase=./ /host This is pretty much cut and past from Tomcat: The Definitive Guide from Safari Online. This did not work. I would get just get a blank webpage. I then tried to update the host file. I didn't see why I'd need to do that since my DNS setup at Mydomain.com was working for ssh. I add domain1.com to the line for my localhost. I restarted Tomcat. No change. I am able to run the system on port 80 using just the localhost default settings. I figured I just did something wrong. I switched to this directions http://www.ex-parrot.com/~pete/tomcat-vhost.html This didn't worked either. When I looked at the requests in in Safari, it showed this as a bad request. I can telnet domain1.com 80. When I try GET index.jsp or index,html or /. Nothing happens. No error. It just closed the connection as if everything was working fine. I tried lynx from the server prompt. It gives a http 400 error, I think. It flashes by so fast I'm not sure. The catalina.out has no errors. I have my DNS setup via mydomain.com dns management tool. I have my A record pointing to the address. I don't think I need to do anything else. I'm at a loss of what to do now to troubleshoot this problem. I searched the mail list and the website nothing has jumped out at me. So, I hoping some kind soul might give me some pointers. What kills me is I'm sure this is something obvious I missed or not seeing. Thanks, Jeff Duska [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Troubleshooting Virtual Hosts with Tomcat 5 standalone mode...
Jeff Duska wrote: I'm trying to setup a couple of virtual hosts using Tomcat in stand alone mode. I started with the goal of having a user directory for each virtual host. For example, for the sample domain1.com the appbase would be /home/domain/webapps. I setup my server.xml file to have the following host settings Host name=domain1.com debug=0 appBase=/home/domain/webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false Context path= docBase=./ /host OK, don't do that :-) Don't put the Context elements in server.xml. Put your Host elements there, e.g. Host name=oahu appBase=/www/oahu/Host Host name=maui appBase=/www/maui/Host Host name=kauai appBase=/www/kauai/Host Then (assuming you're using the default Engine name) make directories $CATALINA_HOME/conf/Catalina/oahu $CATALINA_HOME/conf/Catalina/maui $CATALINA_HOME/conf/Catalina/kauai In each of those put your Context files, as in $CATALINA_HOME/conf/Catalina/oahu/ROOT.xml $CATALINA_HOME/conf/Catalina/oahu/manager.xml !-- the above if you want the manager app available -- $CATALINA_HOME/conf/Catalina/oahu/cowabunga.xml !-- etc... -- which will look (minimally!) like Context docBase=/www/oahu/ROOT !-- define Resources, etc. -- /Context That's it. Restart tomcat. Done. See, wasn't that easy? :-) HTH! -- Hassan Schroeder - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webtuitive Design === (+1) 408-938-0567 === http://webtuitive.com dream. code. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat at Standalone
This question must have been asked a million times but I can't seem to find any information on it - any advice would be appreciated. I need to stand up a web site that will only serve jsp and servlets. I suspect the number of concurrent users will be no more than 10, but it could possibly grow in the future. Here are my questions: What is industry best practice for setting up a jsp/servlet site that will not require any static HTML pages? Can Tomcat be reliably used as standalone for this purpose? Is this the normal configuration for this type of site? Are there known security issues with using Tomcat in standalone? The other piece would be Apache, if it is standard practice to use it even if you don't need to serve HTML pages. Also, I will be doing all of my own authentication into the site so no security features of Apache or Tomcat will be required. Thanks a lot for any advice or pointers! Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat at Standalone
Tomcat as a standalone is really fast,reliable and good. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Anderson, M. Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: Friday, March 04, 2005 2:02 PM Aan: Tomcat Users List Onderwerp: Tomcat at Standalone This question must have been asked a million times but I can't seem to find any information on it - any advice would be appreciated. I need to stand up a web site that will only serve jsp and servlets. I suspect the number of concurrent users will be no more than 10, but it could possibly grow in the future. Here are my questions: What is industry best practice for setting up a jsp/servlet site that will not require any static HTML pages? Can Tomcat be reliably used as standalone for this purpose? Is this the normal configuration for this type of site? Are there known security issues with using Tomcat in standalone? The other piece would be Apache, if it is standard practice to use it even if you don't need to serve HTML pages. Also, I will be doing all of my own authentication into the site so no security features of Apache or Tomcat will be required. Thanks a lot for any advice or pointers! Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat at Standalone
I will attempt to answer you questions as best I can. Your file structure of your site will typically look something like this $CATALINA_HOME/ webapps/ (PLACE YOUR WEBAPPS HERE) common/ lib/ conf/ Catalina/ localhost (CONTEXT DESCRIPTER GOES HERE) bin/ server/ Now your web application will be placed in the webapp directory. This will setup as follows: webapp/ someapplication/ pages/ Place all your jsp's here css/ Style sheets images/ images WEB-INF/ web.xml --- need to configure this classes/ --- application specific classes go here lib/ --- application specific jars go here Yes you can use tomcat standalone. If you are using a unix environment, port 80 is a priviledged port and you must either run tomcat as root (I do not recommend this), use jscv, or Mod_JK, or Mod_Proxy. By default, Tomcat runs on port 8080, but this can be changed to whatever you want. No more security issues than with any other webserver. You need to keep up on your patches/upgrades and monitor the security bulletins. Don't run it as root on a Unix box or Local System or Administrator on Windows. Sometimes it is easier to use the built in authentication mechanisms. That is why developers provided this stuffto save you time and effort. Tomcat provides a variety of login mechanisms. I would read up on them to see if they fit your needs. I hope that helps you out. It took me a while to figure all this stuff out and I still don't know a 1/3 of what I should. But this list is a great place to get info from. Thanks Randall -Original Message- From: Anderson, M. Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 6:02 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Tomcat at Standalone This question must have been asked a million times but I can't seem to find any information on it - any advice would be appreciated. I need to stand up a web site that will only serve jsp and servlets. I suspect the number of concurrent users will be no more than 10, but it could possibly grow in the future. Here are my questions: What is industry best practice for setting up a jsp/servlet site that will not require any static HTML pages? Can Tomcat be reliably used as standalone for this purpose? Is this the normal configuration for this type of site? Are there known security issues with using Tomcat in standalone? The other piece would be Apache, if it is standard practice to use it even if you don't need to serve HTML pages. Also, I will be doing all of my own authentication into the site so no security features of Apache or Tomcat will be required. Thanks a lot for any advice or pointers! Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat as standalone
Putting Apache on an Internet-visible network, and having this route its traffic to Tomcat on a local network on your website (eg a 10, 172 or 192.168 address) can improve your security no end. There is no direct way to your Tomcat server. As long as you have tightend your code for SQL and HTML scams, you will have a very safe environment. Of course this means a second server and so more cost, but if you want a Rolls-Royce solution... :-) Joe. From: Ben Souther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat as standalone Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:54:52 -0500 Since 90% of your app is dynamic, there is a good chance that Tomcat as a standalone may actually be more efficient. The work the webserver and connector has to do to pass the requests/responses back and forth to tomcat is all in addition to what Tomcat would have to do anyway. I would recommend giving Tomcat as a standalone a shot. If you feel you need more performance, look into your options. Putting a webserver in front of Tomcat is one of them. Load balancing, heavier hardware, clustering, are some others. Remember, Tomcat, The Apache Web Server, and the connectors needed to join the two don't have the same release cycles. Besides performance, you also want to consider maintenance and upkeep costs. If you want to be real thorough, set up both scenarios and compare them under load. Set up SSL under both scenerios. Also compare the effort to get them up and running. Then also take a look at the open bug list for Tomcat to see how many issues are related to connectors. Look at the release cycles for tomcat, apache, and the connectors. Then look at how much time you have budgeted for maintaining each setup. Without looking at your app, hardware and business plan, nobody can tell you for certain which way to go. One thing to be aware of. There is a lot of outdated information on the web claiming that Tomcat as a standalone is not ready for production. If you come across one of these sites, make sure you know either when it was written or what version of Tomcat they're talking about. Both Tomcat and the JVMs needed to run it have made great strides in recent years. What was accurate at the time it was written may be very inaccurate now. On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 23:33, Dola Woolfe wrote: It 90% of my website is dynamic, is it a good idea to skip the apache server altogether and just run Tomcat alone on port 80? Seems like a good idea: one few application to worry about, no headache with connecting apache and tomcat (which I still haven't figured out how to do with 5.x) and so forth. Please, any opinions. Also is 5.5 ready for prime-time? Thank you very much in advance. Dola __ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat as standalone
When done right, true. Apache has a long, proven track record when it comes to safety. But also remember, if you have two servers running, you have to servers to secure and monitor. You'll have to keep on top of any new exploits for Tomcat AND Apache. On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 08:38, Jon Doe wrote: Putting Apache on an Internet-visible network, and having this route its traffic to Tomcat on a local network on your website (eg a 10, 172 or 192.168 address) can improve your security no end. There is no direct way to your Tomcat server. As long as you have tightend your code for SQL and HTML scams, you will have a very safe environment. Of course this means a second server and so more cost, but if you want a Rolls-Royce solution... :-) Joe. From: Ben Souther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat as standalone Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:54:52 -0500 Since 90% of your app is dynamic, there is a good chance that Tomcat as a standalone may actually be more efficient. The work the webserver and connector has to do to pass the requests/responses back and forth to tomcat is all in addition to what Tomcat would have to do anyway. I would recommend giving Tomcat as a standalone a shot. If you feel you need more performance, look into your options. Putting a webserver in front of Tomcat is one of them. Load balancing, heavier hardware, clustering, are some others. Remember, Tomcat, The Apache Web Server, and the connectors needed to join the two don't have the same release cycles. Besides performance, you also want to consider maintenance and upkeep costs. If you want to be real thorough, set up both scenarios and compare them under load. Set up SSL under both scenerios. Also compare the effort to get them up and running. Then also take a look at the open bug list for Tomcat to see how many issues are related to connectors. Look at the release cycles for tomcat, apache, and the connectors. Then look at how much time you have budgeted for maintaining each setup. Without looking at your app, hardware and business plan, nobody can tell you for certain which way to go. One thing to be aware of. There is a lot of outdated information on the web claiming that Tomcat as a standalone is not ready for production. If you come across one of these sites, make sure you know either when it was written or what version of Tomcat they're talking about. Both Tomcat and the JVMs needed to run it have made great strides in recent years. What was accurate at the time it was written may be very inaccurate now. On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 23:33, Dola Woolfe wrote: It 90% of my website is dynamic, is it a good idea to skip the apache server altogether and just run Tomcat alone on port 80? Seems like a good idea: one few application to worry about, no headache with connecting apache and tomcat (which I still haven't figured out how to do with 5.x) and so forth. Please, any opinions. Also is 5.5 ready for prime-time? Thank you very much in advance. Dola __ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat as standalone
It 90% of my website is dynamic, is it a good idea to skip the apache server altogether and just run Tomcat alone on port 80? Seems like a good idea: one few application to worry about, no headache with connecting apache and tomcat (which I still haven't figured out how to do with 5.x) and so forth. Please, any opinions. Also is 5.5 ready for prime-time? Thank you very much in advance. Dola __ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat as standalone
Dola, You will find a wealth of opinions on this. The real answer is always a big IT DEPENDS. Because each case is different only you can really determine this. Some things to ask: Is there something you are doing that Tomcat can't do unless connected to Apache? Are the majority of your hits to the static content? How many apps are running? How will the apps and static content be managed? And I am sure many on the list (more experienced than I) can add some more. I currently have a small site and all is served by Tomcat. Performs fine for me. As Tomcat has matured it has improved to the point that it can run standalone in all but the most demanding situations. And again you will find a wide range of opinions on this. To begin with, I think you will be fine with Tomcat alone. Unless there is a functionality of Apache that you need. You can always add it later if needed. Just my .02 Doug - Original Message - From: Dola Woolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tom Cat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 11:33 PM Subject: Tomcat as standalone It 90% of my website is dynamic, is it a good idea to skip the apache server altogether and just run Tomcat alone on port 80? Seems like a good idea: one few application to worry about, no headache with connecting apache and tomcat (which I still haven't figured out how to do with 5.x) and so forth. Please, any opinions. Also is 5.5 ready for prime-time? Thank you very much in advance. Dola __ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat as standalone
Since 90% of your app is dynamic, there is a good chance that Tomcat as a standalone may actually be more efficient. The work the webserver and connector has to do to pass the requests/responses back and forth to tomcat is all in addition to what Tomcat would have to do anyway. I would recommend giving Tomcat as a standalone a shot. If you feel you need more performance, look into your options. Putting a webserver in front of Tomcat is one of them. Load balancing, heavier hardware, clustering, are some others. Remember, Tomcat, The Apache Web Server, and the connectors needed to join the two don't have the same release cycles. Besides performance, you also want to consider maintenance and upkeep costs. If you want to be real thorough, set up both scenarios and compare them under load. Set up SSL under both scenerios. Also compare the effort to get them up and running. Then also take a look at the open bug list for Tomcat to see how many issues are related to connectors. Look at the release cycles for tomcat, apache, and the connectors. Then look at how much time you have budgeted for maintaining each setup. Without looking at your app, hardware and business plan, nobody can tell you for certain which way to go. One thing to be aware of. There is a lot of outdated information on the web claiming that Tomcat as a standalone is not ready for production. If you come across one of these sites, make sure you know either when it was written or what version of Tomcat they're talking about. Both Tomcat and the JVMs needed to run it have made great strides in recent years. What was accurate at the time it was written may be very inaccurate now. On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 23:33, Dola Woolfe wrote: It 90% of my website is dynamic, is it a good idea to skip the apache server altogether and just run Tomcat alone on port 80? Seems like a good idea: one few application to worry about, no headache with connecting apache and tomcat (which I still haven't figured out how to do with 5.x) and so forth. Please, any opinions. Also is 5.5 ready for prime-time? Thank you very much in advance. Dola __ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat 4.1.30 Standalone and FOP ?
Hi, Can i associate FOP with Tomcat 4.1.30 without Apache ?? Thanks Philippe Philippe COUAS Responsable Développement INFODEV S.A.
Re: Tomcat 4.1.30 Standalone and FOP ?
if you are refering to the jakarta Formatting Objects Processor libraries then yes, I use them extensively for pdf report generation. Put the FOP jar, plus any of the XML/XSLT etc jars, in a suitable location and off you go Matt - Original Message - From: Philippe Couas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 11:29 AM Subject: Tomcat 4.1.30 Standalone and FOP ? Hi, Can i associate FOP with Tomcat 4.1.30 without Apache ?? Thanks Philippe Philippe COUAS Responsable Développement INFODEV S.A. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat 5 standalone, SSL, IE problem...
Howdy, I'm running tomcat 5.0.16, jdk 1.4.1_02-b06 on Solaris 8 and am running into an issue with IE. It seems that when I use IE wihtout SSL things work fine, but when I use IE with SSL the form posts I'm sending don't always submit properly. I know it sounds crazy, but, I'm wondering if there are any known incompatibilities between IE and tomcat ssl? Or any special configuration settings I need to do in order to make IE and Tomcat happy together? Thanks, -gabe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disabling PUT and DELETE methods in Tomcat 5 standalone
Hi, Is there any way to prevent the server from responding to these methods? I ran the same scan tests on one of our Apache boxes and it can back complete dead on the PUT and DELETE methods i.e. it didn't respond in any way - that's the behaviour we're looking for. Would the same not be possible on Tomcat standalone? Please define completely dead more specifically: did your scans time out? Return with a 404 error? Another HTTP response code? You can do a variety of things, depending on how portable you want to be. I like the security-constraint approach. Another possibility is a simple filter (javax.servlet.Filter, portable) or Valve (tomcat-specific, but earlier in the request processing pipeline which might be key for you, and also slightly more performant), which simply checks the request method (HttpServletRequest#getMethod) and rejects the request if needed in whatever way you prefer. Going further down the customization path would be modifying the Coyote connector itself to reject requests with certain methods. This would be a generalization of the current allowTrace functionality. If you do a nice patch for this feel free to suggest it back to us as an enhancement ;) Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disabling PUT and DELETE methods in Tomcat 5 standalone
On 03/08/2004 10:15 AM funkster wrote: security-constraint web-resource-collection web-resource-nameDisable Methods/web-resource-name url-pattern/*/url-pattern http-methodPUT/http-method http-methodDELETE/http-method /web-resource-collection auth-constraint role-name/role-name /auth-constraint /security-constraint I was under the impression that by not including a role-name value, then all PUT and DELETE method requests are disabled since the security constraint cannot be linked to a role. However, the fact that it doesn't work yet means I'm doing something wrong somewhere! Well, you haven't disabled it. You have protected it. As far as I can tell, you would be required to login first, and then you would be denied access. (When tomcat finds out that you are not in no roles?!) Adam -- struts 1.1 + tomcat 5.0.16 + java 1.4.2 Linux 2.4.20 Debian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disabling PUT and DELETE methods in Tomcat 5 standalone
So, how would I go about actually prevent PUT and DELETE for all users, logged in or otherwise? I've been hitting my head against this one for some time, with no luck. The solution needs to allow anonymous users to access the site (i.e. no login) and still prevent PUT and DELETE methods. Thanks, James On 03/08/2004 10:15 AM funkster wrote: security-constraint web-resource-collection web-resource-nameDisable Methods/web-resource-name url-pattern/*/url-pattern http-methodPUT/http-method http-methodDELETE/http-method /web-resource-collection auth-constraint role-name/role-name /auth-constraint /security-constraint I was under the impression that by not including a role-name value, then all PUT and DELETE method requests are disabled since the security constraint cannot be linked to a role. However, the fact that it doesn't work yet means I'm doing something wrong somewhere! Well, you haven't disabled it. You have protected it. As far as I can tell, you would be required to login first, and then you would be denied access. (When tomcat finds out that you are not in no roles?!) Adam -- struts 1.1 + tomcat 5.0.16 + java 1.4.2 Linux 2.4.20 Debian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disabling PUT and DELETE methods in Tomcat 5 standalone
What I was implying is that you have effectively disabled it already this way. Or are you able to do PUTs and DELETEs despite the security constraint? I'd be surprised. Adam On 03/08/2004 11:24 PM James Agnew wrote: So, how would I go about actually prevent PUT and DELETE for all users, logged in or otherwise? I've been hitting my head against this one for some time, with no luck. The solution needs to allow anonymous users to access the site (i.e. no login) and still prevent PUT and DELETE methods. Thanks, James On 03/08/2004 10:15 AM funkster wrote: security-constraint web-resource-collection web-resource-nameDisable Methods/web-resource-name url-pattern/*/url-pattern http-methodPUT/http-method http-methodDELETE/http-method /web-resource-collection auth-constraint role-name/role-name /auth-constraint /security-constraint I was under the impression that by not including a role-name value, then all PUT and DELETE method requests are disabled since the security constraint cannot be linked to a role. However, the fact that it doesn't work yet means I'm doing something wrong somewhere! Well, you haven't disabled it. You have protected it. As far as I can tell, you would be required to login first, and then you would be denied access. (When tomcat finds out that you are not in no roles?!) Adam -- struts 1.1 + tomcat 5.0.16 + java 1.4.2 Linux 2.4.20 Debian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- struts 1.1 + tomcat 5.0.16 + java 1.4.2 Linux 2.4.20 Debian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disabling PUT and DELETE methods in Tomcat 5 standalone
You've disabled it in the sense that no matter what you type in, you will not be allowed in, but it's not a blackhole or tarpit situation (ie: the server does NOT respond in ANY way to a PUT or DELETE request). In the case of configuring a null role, the server still responds with an authorization request. -Original Message- From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 4:40 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Disabling PUT and DELETE methods in Tomcat 5 standalone What I was implying is that you have effectively disabled it already this way. Or are you able to do PUTs and DELETEs despite the security constraint? I'd be surprised. Adam On 03/08/2004 11:24 PM James Agnew wrote: So, how would I go about actually prevent PUT and DELETE for all users, logged in or otherwise? I've been hitting my head against this one for some time, with no luck. The solution needs to allow anonymous users to access the site (i.e. no login) and still prevent PUT and DELETE methods. Thanks, James On 03/08/2004 10:15 AM funkster wrote: security-constraint web-resource-collection web-resource-nameDisable Methods/web-resource-name url-pattern/*/url-pattern http-methodPUT/http-method http-methodDELETE/http-method /web-resource-collection auth-constraint role-name/role-name /auth-constraint /security-constraint I was under the impression that by not including a role-name value, then all PUT and DELETE method requests are disabled since the security constraint cannot be linked to a role. However, the fact that it doesn't work yet means I'm doing something wrong somewhere! Well, you haven't disabled it. You have protected it. As far as I can tell, you would be required to login first, and then you would be denied access. (When tomcat finds out that you are not in no roles?!) Adam -- struts 1.1 + tomcat 5.0.16 + java 1.4.2 Linux 2.4.20 Debian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- struts 1.1 + tomcat 5.0.16 + java 1.4.2 Linux 2.4.20 Debian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disabling PUT and DELETE methods in Tomcat 5 standalone
There's no implementation of the servlet doPut() and doDelete() methods so nothing can actually be put or deleted, but that's true before even creating the security constraint. Yet, testing for PUT and DELETE methods still show that they're enabled. Our security scanners still flag these methods as being available, albeit not exploitable. Is there any way to prevent the server from responding to these methods? I ran the same scan tests on one of our Apache boxes and it can back complete dead on the PUT and DELETE methods i.e. it didn't respond in any way - that's the behaviour we're looking for. Would the same not be possible on Tomcat standalone? Thanks, David - Original Message - From: Adam Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 11:39 PM Subject: Re: Disabling PUT and DELETE methods in Tomcat 5 standalone What I was implying is that you have effectively disabled it already this way. Or are you able to do PUTs and DELETEs despite the security constraint? I'd be surprised. Adam On 03/08/2004 11:24 PM James Agnew wrote: So, how would I go about actually prevent PUT and DELETE for all users, logged in or otherwise? I've been hitting my head against this one for some time, with no luck. The solution needs to allow anonymous users to access the site (i.e. no login) and still prevent PUT and DELETE methods. Thanks, James On 03/08/2004 10:15 AM funkster wrote: security-constraint web-resource-collection web-resource-nameDisable Methods/web-resource-name url-pattern/*/url-pattern http-methodPUT/http-method http-methodDELETE/http-method /web-resource-collection auth-constraint role-name/role-name /auth-constraint /security-constraint I was under the impression that by not including a role-name value, then all PUT and DELETE method requests are disabled since the security constraint cannot be linked to a role. However, the fact that it doesn't work yet means I'm doing something wrong somewhere! Well, you haven't disabled it. You have protected it. As far as I can tell, you would be required to login first, and then you would be denied access. (When tomcat finds out that you are not in no roles?!) Adam -- struts 1.1 + tomcat 5.0.16 + java 1.4.2 Linux 2.4.20 Debian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- struts 1.1 + tomcat 5.0.16 + java 1.4.2 Linux 2.4.20 Debian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disabling PUT and DELETE methods in Tomcat 5 standalone
Running Nessus against our server (Debian Woody + standalone Tomcat 5.0.18) produces a security warning that the PUT and DELETE http methods are enabled in Tomcat. Although these warning were not exploitable, I really need to ensure that these 2 methods are completely disabled. I've spent a good while looking into this, and this is where I'm at so far - I've placed the following in $CATALINA_HOME/conf/web.xml security-constraint web-resource-collection web-resource-nameDisable Methods/web-resource-name url-pattern/*/url-pattern http-methodPUT/http-method http-methodDELETE/http-method /web-resource-collection auth-constraint role-name/role-name /auth-constraint /security-constraint I was under the impression that by not including a role-name value, then all PUT and DELETE method requests are disabled since the security constraint cannot be linked to a role. However, the fact that it doesn't work yet means I'm doing something wrong somewhere! Any guidance is very much appreciated. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5 standalone on Linux 2.6
David Rees wrote: On Wed, January 7, 2004 1at 1:54 am, Remy Maucherat wrote: Does anyone have stability issues on this platform (without any LD_ASSUME_KERNEL, and with Sun JDK 1.4.2 or similar very recent VM) ? I'm trying to compare with Redhat 9 and see if the troubles also happen with that (cleaner) platform. Bonus question: How's the performance / scalability ? I've been running Linux kernels 2.6.0 on a couple of very lightly loaded Tomcat servers without any issues. This is running on Fedora Core 1 and JDK 1.4.2_01-b06 (which reminds me, I should upgrade that machine to the latest JDK, 1.4.2_03-b02). No LD_ASSUME_KERNEL env vars set. I also have a Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.6.0 server running Tomcat with JDK 1.4.2_02-b03 with no problems, but again it's a development server so no real load. I haven't done any performance / scalability tests but theoretically it should be a lot better than 2.4 kernels. This was a bonus question :) I was wondering if Tomcat 5 (or 4.1.29, it's basically the same for the connector) had the same issues than on Redhat 9 (with Redhat kernels) and therefore needed a LD_ASSUME_KERNEL. The Redhat issue occurs regardless of the load, so your answer clears this :) Thanks ! BTW, I'm not sure what platform you really mean by Linux 2.6 as that isn't a specific platform, but any Linux distribution running a 2.6 kernel. Yes, that was the question. -- x Rémy Maucherat Senior Developer Consultant JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL x - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5 standalone on Linux 2.6
I've also been running a development machine with RH9/kernel 2.6.0 using Tomcat 4.1.29/Apache 2.0.48/mod_jk/JDK-1.4.2_03/struts/jdbc-common pool/Postgresql-7.4.1. No real load test yet, but haven't needed to set the LD_KERNEL_ASSUME yet. I'm going to start working with JMeter and see if I can produce some benchmark results against the 2.4 kernel. I'll be putting the setup procedure and benchmark results here: http://daydream.stanford.edu/tomcat/install_web_services.html What was meant by Linux 2.6? Was that Debian or Suse? Oscar Does anyone have stability issues on this platform (without any LD_ASSUME_KERNEL, and with Sun JDK 1.4.2 or similar very recent VM) ? I'm trying to compare with Redhat 9 and see if the troubles also happen with that (cleaner) platform. Bonus question: How's the performance / scalability ? I've been running Linux kernels 2.6.0 on a couple of very lightly loaded Tomcat servers without any issues. This is running on Fedora Core 1 and JDK 1.4.2_01-b06 (which reminds me, I should upgrade that machine to the latest JDK, 1.4.2_03-b02). No LD_ASSUME_KERNEL env vars set. I also have a Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.6.0 server running Tomcat with JDK 1.4.2_02-b03 with no problems, but again it's a development server so no real load. I haven't done any performance / scalability tests but theoretically it should be a lot better than 2.4 kernels. BTW, I'm not sure what platform you really mean by Linux 2.6 as that isn't a specific platform, but any Linux distribution running a 2.6 kernel. -Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat 5 standalone on Linux 2.6
Hi, Does anyone have stability issues on this platform (without any LD_ASSUME_KERNEL, and with Sun JDK 1.4.2 or similar very recent VM) ? I'm trying to compare with Redhat 9 and see if the troubles also happen with that (cleaner) platform. Bonus question: How's the performance / scalability ? Thanks :) -- x Rémy Maucherat Senior Developer Consultant JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL x - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5 standalone on Linux 2.6
On Wed, January 7, 2004 1at 1:54 am, Remy Maucherat wrote: Does anyone have stability issues on this platform (without any LD_ASSUME_KERNEL, and with Sun JDK 1.4.2 or similar very recent VM) ? I'm trying to compare with Redhat 9 and see if the troubles also happen with that (cleaner) platform. Bonus question: How's the performance / scalability ? I've been running Linux kernels 2.6.0 on a couple of very lightly loaded Tomcat servers without any issues. This is running on Fedora Core 1 and JDK 1.4.2_01-b06 (which reminds me, I should upgrade that machine to the latest JDK, 1.4.2_03-b02). No LD_ASSUME_KERNEL env vars set. I also have a Redhat 7.3 with kernel 2.6.0 server running Tomcat with JDK 1.4.2_02-b03 with no problems, but again it's a development server so no real load. I haven't done any performance / scalability tests but theoretically it should be a lot better than 2.4 kernels. BTW, I'm not sure what platform you really mean by Linux 2.6 as that isn't a specific platform, but any Linux distribution running a 2.6 kernel. -Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception
Hi all, After realizing that the application bug wasn't a bug or my main culprit, I did some checking on my machine setup. I found that Hyperthreading actually decreased the total load Tomcat could handle. Once I turned HT off, I was able to significantly increase the amount of load the server could handle (my application uses a lot of jsp pages). Just wanted to post a follow up. -Hakan -Original Message- From: Kilic, Hakan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:53 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception Hi Yansheng, That was a great link, thanks! I did happen to have an error page specified for my application, and once I removed this, I found that another java exception was being reported, one from my application itself, that was being hidden by the illegalstateexception. Thanks so much! -Hakan Kilic -Original Message- From: Yansheng Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:17 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception Here is a good link explaining the error: http://www2.real-time.com/rte-tomcat/2000/Jun/msg02488.html -Original Message- From: Yansheng Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:12 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception I will give this a try: I don't think this is related to the number of requests. By default, JSP pages will try to create a session. So if you call a new jsp page after the response has been sent committed, this is exactly what is supposed to happen. Are you trying to forward or redirect the reponse after it's being committed? How do you test your application, btw? -Yan -Original Message- From: Kilic, Hakan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:47 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception Hi all, I'm running into this java exception only when increasing my traffic to my Tomcat web server. I'm running Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone, and my traffic is about 100 concurrent connections when this happens. I'm just wondering if a) This error is really related to reaching the max number of requests my server can handle b) How can I increase the number of requests my server can service, already tinkered around with connections in the server.xml (it's a dual P3 1.4 GHz, 2G ram machine) c) What's this java exception really mean. 2003-11-18 12:45:17 JspFactoryImpl: Exception initializing page context java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot create a session after the response has been committed at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequest.doGetSession(CoyoteRequest.java:1884 ) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequest.getSession(CoyoteRequest.java:1731) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequestFacade.getSession(CoyoteRequestFacade .java:365) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequestFacade.getSession(CoyoteRequestFacade .java:370) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequestWrapper.getSession(HttpServletRequestWr apper.java:268) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl._initialize(PageContextImpl.java:1 38) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.initialize(PageContextImpl.java:11 4) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl.internalGetPageContext(JspFactoryIm pl.java:175) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl.getPageContext(JspFactoryImpl.java: 154) at org.apache.jsp.core_loadtest_jsp._jspService(core_loadtest_jsp.java:33) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:137) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:2 10) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:295) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:241) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatcher. java:684) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doInclude(ApplicationDispatch er.java:575) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.include(ApplicationDispatcher .java:498) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspRuntimeLibrary.include(JspRuntimeLibrary.java:8 22) at org.apache.jsp.digits_jsp._jspService(digits_jsp.java:2905) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:137) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:2 10) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:295
RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception
Howdy, Thank you for posting the followup -- it's important when people actually report results. Expect JDK 1.5 (this is not a tomcat-specific issue) to run better on Hyperthreaded machines. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -Original Message- From: Kilic, Hakan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:48 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception Hi all, After realizing that the application bug wasn't a bug or my main culprit, I did some checking on my machine setup. I found that Hyperthreading actually decreased the total load Tomcat could handle. Once I turned HT off, I was able to significantly increase the amount of load the server could handle (my application uses a lot of jsp pages). Just wanted to post a follow up. -Hakan -Original Message- From: Kilic, Hakan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:53 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception Hi Yansheng, That was a great link, thanks! I did happen to have an error page specified for my application, and once I removed this, I found that another java exception was being reported, one from my application itself, that was being hidden by the illegalstateexception. Thanks so much! -Hakan Kilic -Original Message- From: Yansheng Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:17 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception Here is a good link explaining the error: http://www2.real-time.com/rte-tomcat/2000/Jun/msg02488.html -Original Message- From: Yansheng Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:12 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception I will give this a try: I don't think this is related to the number of requests. By default, JSP pages will try to create a session. So if you call a new jsp page after the response has been sent committed, this is exactly what is supposed to happen. Are you trying to forward or redirect the reponse after it's being committed? How do you test your application, btw? -Yan -Original Message- From: Kilic, Hakan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:47 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception Hi all, I'm running into this java exception only when increasing my traffic to my Tomcat web server. I'm running Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone, and my traffic is about 100 concurrent connections when this happens. I'm just wondering if a) This error is really related to reaching the max number of requests my server can handle b) How can I increase the number of requests my server can service, already tinkered around with connections in the server.xml (it's a dual P3 1.4 GHz, 2G ram machine) c) What's this java exception really mean. 2003-11-18 12:45:17 JspFactoryImpl: Exception initializing page context java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot create a session after the response has been committed at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequest.doGetSession(CoyoteRequest.java :188 4 ) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequest.getSession(CoyoteRequest.java:1 731) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequestFacade.getSession(CoyoteRequestF acad e .java:365) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequestFacade.getSession(CoyoteRequestF acad e .java:370) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequestWrapper.getSession(HttpServletRequ estW r apper.java:268) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl._initialize(PageContextImpl.j ava: 1 38) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.initialize(PageContextImpl.ja va:1 1 4) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl.internalGetPageContext(JspFact oryI m pl.java:175) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl.getPageContext(JspFactoryImpl. java : 154) at org.apache.jsp.core_loadtest_jsp._jspService(core_loadtest_jsp.java:33) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:137) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.j ava: 2 10) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:295 ) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:241) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispat cher . java:684) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doInclude(ApplicationDis patc h er.java:575) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.include(ApplicationDispa tche r .java:498) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspRuntimeLibrary.include
RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception
Hi Yansheng, That was a great link, thanks! I did happen to have an error page specified for my application, and once I removed this, I found that another java exception was being reported, one from my application itself, that was being hidden by the illegalstateexception. Thanks so much! -Hakan Kilic -Original Message- From: Yansheng Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:17 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception Here is a good link explaining the error: http://www2.real-time.com/rte-tomcat/2000/Jun/msg02488.html -Original Message- From: Yansheng Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:12 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception I will give this a try: I don't think this is related to the number of requests. By default, JSP pages will try to create a session. So if you call a new jsp page after the response has been sent committed, this is exactly what is supposed to happen. Are you trying to forward or redirect the reponse after it's being committed? How do you test your application, btw? -Yan -Original Message- From: Kilic, Hakan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:47 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception Hi all, I'm running into this java exception only when increasing my traffic to my Tomcat web server. I'm running Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone, and my traffic is about 100 concurrent connections when this happens. I'm just wondering if a) This error is really related to reaching the max number of requests my server can handle b) How can I increase the number of requests my server can service, already tinkered around with connections in the server.xml (it's a dual P3 1.4 GHz, 2G ram machine) c) What's this java exception really mean. 2003-11-18 12:45:17 JspFactoryImpl: Exception initializing page context java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot create a session after the response has been committed at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequest.doGetSession(CoyoteRequest.java:1884 ) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequest.getSession(CoyoteRequest.java:1731) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequestFacade.getSession(CoyoteRequestFacade .java:365) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequestFacade.getSession(CoyoteRequestFacade .java:370) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequestWrapper.getSession(HttpServletRequestWr apper.java:268) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl._initialize(PageContextImpl.java:1 38) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.initialize(PageContextImpl.java:11 4) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl.internalGetPageContext(JspFactoryIm pl.java:175) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl.getPageContext(JspFactoryImpl.java: 154) at org.apache.jsp.core_loadtest_jsp._jspService(core_loadtest_jsp.java:33) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:137) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:2 10) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:295) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:241) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatcher. java:684) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doInclude(ApplicationDispatch er.java:575) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.include(ApplicationDispatcher .java:498) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspRuntimeLibrary.include(JspRuntimeLibrary.java:8 22) at org.apache.jsp.digits_jsp._jspService(digits_jsp.java:2905) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:137) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:2 10) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:295) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:241) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Application FilterChain.java:247) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterCh ain.java:193) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.ja va:256) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invok eNext(StandardPipeline.java:643) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke
RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception
I will give this a try: I don't think this is related to the number of requests. By default, JSP pages will try to create a session. So if you call a new jsp page after the response has been sent committed, this is exactly what is supposed to happen. Are you trying to forward or redirect the reponse after it's being committed? How do you test your application, btw? -Yan -Original Message- From: Kilic, Hakan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:47 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception Hi all, I'm running into this java exception only when increasing my traffic to my Tomcat web server. I'm running Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone, and my traffic is about 100 concurrent connections when this happens. I'm just wondering if a) This error is really related to reaching the max number of requests my server can handle b) How can I increase the number of requests my server can service, already tinkered around with connections in the server.xml (it's a dual P3 1.4 GHz, 2G ram machine) c) What's this java exception really mean. 2003-11-18 12:45:17 JspFactoryImpl: Exception initializing page context java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot create a session after the response has been committed at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequest.doGetSession(CoyoteRequest.java:1884 ) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequest.getSession(CoyoteRequest.java:1731) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequestFacade.getSession(CoyoteRequestFacade .java:365) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequestFacade.getSession(CoyoteRequestFacade .java:370) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequestWrapper.getSession(HttpServletRequestWr apper.java:268) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl._initialize(PageContextImpl.java:1 38) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.initialize(PageContextImpl.java:11 4) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl.internalGetPageContext(JspFactoryIm pl.java:175) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl.getPageContext(JspFactoryImpl.java: 154) at org.apache.jsp.core_loadtest_jsp._jspService(core_loadtest_jsp.java:33) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:137) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:2 10) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:295) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:241) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatcher. java:684) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doInclude(ApplicationDispatch er.java:575) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.include(ApplicationDispatcher .java:498) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspRuntimeLibrary.include(JspRuntimeLibrary.java:8 22) at org.apache.jsp.digits_jsp._jspService(digits_jsp.java:2905) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:137) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:2 10) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:295) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:241) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Application FilterChain.java:247) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterCh ain.java:193) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.ja va:256) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invok eNext(StandardPipeline.java:643) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.ja va:191) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invok eNext(StandardPipeline.java:643) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.invoke(StandardContext.java:2416) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:180 ) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invok eNext(StandardPipeline.java:643) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorDispatcherValve.invoke
RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception
Here is a good link explaining the error: http://www2.real-time.com/rte-tomcat/2000/Jun/msg02488.html -Original Message- From: Yansheng Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:12 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception I will give this a try: I don't think this is related to the number of requests. By default, JSP pages will try to create a session. So if you call a new jsp page after the response has been sent committed, this is exactly what is supposed to happen. Are you trying to forward or redirect the reponse after it's being committed? How do you test your application, btw? -Yan -Original Message- From: Kilic, Hakan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:47 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception Hi all, I'm running into this java exception only when increasing my traffic to my Tomcat web server. I'm running Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone, and my traffic is about 100 concurrent connections when this happens. I'm just wondering if a) This error is really related to reaching the max number of requests my server can handle b) How can I increase the number of requests my server can service, already tinkered around with connections in the server.xml (it's a dual P3 1.4 GHz, 2G ram machine) c) What's this java exception really mean. 2003-11-18 12:45:17 JspFactoryImpl: Exception initializing page context java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot create a session after the response has been committed at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequest.doGetSession(CoyoteRequest.java:1884 ) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequest.getSession(CoyoteRequest.java:1731) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequestFacade.getSession(CoyoteRequestFacade .java:365) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequestFacade.getSession(CoyoteRequestFacade .java:370) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequestWrapper.getSession(HttpServletRequestWr apper.java:268) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl._initialize(PageContextImpl.java:1 38) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.initialize(PageContextImpl.java:11 4) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl.internalGetPageContext(JspFactoryIm pl.java:175) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl.getPageContext(JspFactoryImpl.java: 154) at org.apache.jsp.core_loadtest_jsp._jspService(core_loadtest_jsp.java:33) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:137) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:2 10) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:295) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:241) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatcher. java:684) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doInclude(ApplicationDispatch er.java:575) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.include(ApplicationDispatcher .java:498) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspRuntimeLibrary.include(JspRuntimeLibrary.java:8 22) at org.apache.jsp.digits_jsp._jspService(digits_jsp.java:2905) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:137) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:2 10) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:295) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:241) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Application FilterChain.java:247) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterCh ain.java:193) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.ja va:256) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invok eNext(StandardPipeline.java:643) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.ja va:191) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invok eNext(StandardPipeline.java:643) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995
Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone max requests serviced java exception
Hi all, I'm running into this java exception only when increasing my traffic to my Tomcat web server. I'm running Tomcat 4.1.24 Standalone, and my traffic is about 100 concurrent connections when this happens. I'm just wondering if a) This error is really related to reaching the max number of requests my server can handle b) How can I increase the number of requests my server can service, already tinkered around with connections in the server.xml (it's a dual P3 1.4 GHz, 2G ram machine) c) What's this java exception really mean. 2003-11-18 12:45:17 JspFactoryImpl: Exception initializing page context java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot create a session after the response has been committed at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequest.doGetSession(CoyoteRequest.java:1884 ) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequest.getSession(CoyoteRequest.java:1731) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequestFacade.getSession(CoyoteRequestFacade .java:365) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteRequestFacade.getSession(CoyoteRequestFacade .java:370) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequestWrapper.getSession(HttpServletRequestWr apper.java:268) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl._initialize(PageContextImpl.java:1 38) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.initialize(PageContextImpl.java:11 4) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl.internalGetPageContext(JspFactoryIm pl.java:175) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl.getPageContext(JspFactoryImpl.java: 154) at org.apache.jsp.core_loadtest_jsp._jspService(core_loadtest_jsp.java:33) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:137) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:2 10) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:295) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:241) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatcher. java:684) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doInclude(ApplicationDispatch er.java:575) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.include(ApplicationDispatcher .java:498) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspRuntimeLibrary.include(JspRuntimeLibrary.java:8 22) at org.apache.jsp.digits_jsp._jspService(digits_jsp.java:2905) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:137) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:2 10) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:295) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:241) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Application FilterChain.java:247) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterCh ain.java:193) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.ja va:256) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invok eNext(StandardPipeline.java:643) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.ja va:191) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invok eNext(StandardPipeline.java:643) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.invoke(StandardContext.java:2416) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:180 ) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invok eNext(StandardPipeline.java:643) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorDispatcherValve.invoke(ErrorDispatcherValve. java:171) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invok eNext(StandardPipeline.java:641) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:172 ) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invok eNext(StandardPipeline.java:641) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke
Re: Forcing strong authentication with Tomcat 4.0.6 standalone web server
As much as Tim is trying to help, the real answer is that at the moment only TC 5 supports configuring the cipher-suite (except that it should be technically possible to do in 4.1.29 using JMX). There is a chance that the TC 5 configuration code will be back-ported to a future version of 4.1.x. deric stroud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I'm trying to configure SSL on a standalone Tomcat webserver 4.0.6. and I can't quite work out how and where to configure the server to allow the use of strong authentication only (1024) during cipher suite negotiation. Does someone what lines to add to server.xml file or otherwise? Thanks! Deric _ Un mot doux à envoyer? Une sortie ciné à organiser? Faites le en temps réel avec MSN Messenger! C'est gratuit! http://ifrance.com/_reloc/m _ Envie de discuter en live avec vos amis ? Télécharger MSN Messenger http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/m la 1ère messagerie instantanée de France - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forcing strong authentication with Tomcat 4.0.6 standalone web server
Hi, I'm trying to configure SSL on a standalone Tomcat webserver 4.0.6. and I can't quite work out how and where to configure the server to allow the use of strong authentication only (1024) during cipher suite negotiation. Does someone what lines to add to server.xml file or otherwise? Thanks! Deric _ Un mot doux à envoyer? Une sortie ciné à organiser? Faites le en temps réel avec MSN Messenger! C'est gratuit! http://ifrance.com/_reloc/m _ Envie de discuter en live avec vos amis ? Télécharger MSN Messenger http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/m la 1ère messagerie instantanée de France - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Forcing strong authentication with Tomcat 4.0.6 standalone web server
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/security.html#https -Tim deric stroud wrote: Hi, I'm trying to configure SSL on a standalone Tomcat webserver 4.0.6. and I can't quite work out how and where to configure the server to allow the use of strong authentication only (1024) during cipher suite negotiation. Does someone what lines to add to server.xml file or otherwise? Thanks! Deric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[HOWTO] Tomcat 4.1.27 Standalone Jpackage RPMs
How To Install Tomcat 4.1.27 Standalone using Jpackage RPMs --- The Tomcat Team no longer generates monolithic RPMs for the full or LE version of Tomcat after 4.1.24. Instead, RPMs can be obtained from www.jpackage.org. Jpackage's apparent goal is to generate RPMs for common Java based packages and to standardize the installed directory structure and environment. Because Jpackage manages many RPMs, (at least one for each Java library/tool), there are over 20 RPMs that make up a working Tomcat 4.1 installation. This includes RPMs for the j2sdk and its extensions. As with other RPM managed products, future upgrades to Tomcat may only include one or a handfull of RPMs to be updated. If this sounds daunting or difficult to manage, remember that RPMs make the whole process fairly easy. As mentioned above, Jpackage attempts to unify the Java install environment by repackaging JVMs/JREs into a consistent form that allows multiple versions of Sun, Blackdown, and IBM product RPMs to be plug compatible with other Jpackage components like Tomcat. This eliminates many configuration problems and makes user and service environments generally stable. To realize this goal, some Jpackage RPM installation scripts require that the JVM and related components be installed using Jpackage RPMs; this includes the Tomcat 4.1 RPM. Also, there is also a Jpackage utilities RPM that must be installed to support this install architecture. For many reasons, (see the site FAQ for details), Jpackage cannot distribute binary RPMs for many vendor's products or components. However, Jpackage has created nosrc RPMs that you manually compose, (only once), after pulling the products binary sources from the vendor's web sites. The nosrc designation can be misleading: by building RPMs from these templates, downloaded binary components are not rebuilt from Java or other sources, they are simply repackaged as Jpackage compatible binary RPMs! For a Tomcat 4.1 install, this process must be done for only the JVM and a few of its extensions. Don't let this extra step color your opinion of the Jpackage RPMs! Here are the steps I used to install Tomcat 4.1.27 using the Sun 1.4.2_01 j2sdk on a RedHat 8.0 server, (YMMV): --- 1. Erase any j2sdk and obsolete Tomcat RPM installs. For example, these were the commands I used after saving any Tomcat configuration files or webapps: su - Password: rpm -e j2sdk-1.4.2_01-fcs rpm -e tomcat4-4.1.24-full.2jpp rm -rf /var/tomcat4 rm -rf /etc/tomcat4 exit --- 2. Download the following RPMs from www.jpackage.org: ant-1.5.4-2jpp.noarch.rpm jaf-1.0.2-3jpp.nosrc.rpm jakarta-commons-beanutils-1.6.1-4jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-collections-2.1-4jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-daemon-1.0.cvs20030227-6jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.0-4jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-digester-1.5-3jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-fileupload-1.0-1jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-logging-1.0.3-4jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-modeler-1.1-2jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-pool-1.0.1-5jpp.noarch.rpm java-1.4.2-sun-1.4.2.01-7jpp.nosrc.rpm javamail-1.3.1-1jpp.nosrc.rpm jpackage-utils-1.5.27-1jpp.noarch.rpm jta-1.0.1-0.b.3jpp.nosrc.rpm mx4j-1.1.1-5jpp.noarch.rpm regexp-1.3-1jpp.noarch.rpm servletapi4-4.0.4-3jpp.noarch.rpm tomcat4-4.1.27-2jpp.noarch.rpm tyrex-1.0-3jpp.noarch.rpm xalan-j2-2.5.1-1jpp.noarch.rpm xerces-j2-2.4.0-3jpp.noarch.rpm xml-commons-1.0-0.b2.6jpp.noarch.rpm xml-commons-apis-1.0-0.b2.6jpp.noarch.rpm If you wish to use an older JVM version, choose the nosrc RPM that you wish to use; you may also need to include the following nosrc RPMs for required extensions and libraries depending on the JVM version: jaas-ext-1.0.1-2jpp.nosrc.rpm jdbc-stdext-ext-2.0-12jpp.nosrc.rpm jndi-ext-1.2.1-10jpp.nosrc.rpm jsse-ext-1.0.3.01-5jpp.nosrc.rpm ldapjdk-4.1-5jpp.noarch.rpm oro-2.0.7-1jpp.noarch.rpm --- 3. Download the following binary sources from the Sun j2sdk and appropriate product web sites: j2sdk-1_4_2_01-linux-i586.bin jaf-1_0_2.zip javamail-1_3_1.zip jta-1_0_1B-classes.zip Again, you may also need to download these if you are using older JVM versions: jaas-1_0_01.zip jdbc2_0-stdext.jar jndi-1_2_1.zip jsse-1_0_3_02-do.zip, (or jsse-1_0_3_02-gl.zip) --- 4. Install the require Jpackage utility RPM: su - Password: rpm -U jpackage-utils-1.5.27-1jpp.noarch.rpm exit --- 5. Because we are going to build binary RPMs using the nosrc RPMs and the downloaded binary sources, we need a standard host RPM directory structure. Note that the following RPM building steps should be done in a user directory and not as root on your machine! More details for these steps can be found on the www.jpackage.org web site. Here are the commands to prepare the RPM environment: mkdir ~/rpm mkdir ~/rpm/BUILD mkdir ~/rpm/RPMS mkdir ~/rpm/RPMS/i386 mkdir ~/rpm/RPMS/i586
[HOWTO UPDATE] Tomcat 4.1.27 Standalone Jpackage RPMs
How To Install Tomcat 4.1.27 Standalone using Jpackage RPMs --- The Tomcat Team no longer generates monolithic RPMs for the full or LE version of Tomcat after 4.1.24. Instead, RPMs can be obtained from www.jpackage.org. Jpackage's apparent goal is to generate RPMs for common Java based packages and to standardize the installed directory structure and environment. Because Jpackage manages many RPMs, (at least one for each Java library/tool), there are over 20 RPMs that make up a working Tomcat 4.1 installation. This includes RPMs for the j2sdk and its extensions. As with other RPM managed products, future upgrades to Tomcat may only include one or a handfull of RPMs to be updated. If this sounds daunting or difficult to manage, remember that RPMs make the whole process fairly easy. As mentioned above, Jpackage attempts to unify the Java install environment by repackaging JVMs/JREs into a consistent form that allows multiple versions of Sun, Blackdown, and IBM product RPMs to be plug compatible with other Jpackage components like Tomcat. This eliminates many configuration problems and makes user and service environments generally stable. To realize this goal, some Jpackage RPM installation scripts require that the JVM and related components be installed using Jpackage RPMs; this includes the Tomcat 4.1 RPM. Also, there is also a Jpackage utilities RPM that must be installed to support this install architecture. For many reasons, (see the site FAQ for details), Jpackage cannot distribute binary RPMs for many vendor's products or components. However, Jpackage has created nosrc RPMs that you manually compose, (only once), after pulling the products binary sources from the vendor's web sites. The nosrc designation can be misleading: by building RPMs from these templates, downloaded binary components are not rebuilt from Java or other sources, they are simply repackaged as Jpackage compatible binary RPMs! For a Tomcat 4.1 install, this process must be done for only the JVM and a few of its extensions. Don't let this extra step color your opinion of the Jpackage RPMs! Here are the steps I used to install Tomcat 4.1.27 using the Sun 1.4.2_01 j2sdk on a RedHat 8.0 server, (YMMV): --- 1. Erase any j2sdk and obsolete Tomcat RPM installs. For example, these were the commands I used after saving any Tomcat configuration files or webapps: su - Password: rpm -e j2sdk-1.4.2_01-fcs rpm -e tomcat4-4.1.24-full.2jpp rm -rf /var/tomcat4 rm -rf /etc/tomcat4 rm -rf /var/log/tomcat4 exit --- 2. Download the following RPMs from www.jpackage.org: ant-1.5.4-2jpp.noarch.rpm jaf-1.0.2-3jpp.nosrc.rpm jakarta-commons-beanutils-1.6.1-4jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-collections-2.1-4jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-daemon-1.0.cvs20030227-6jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.0-4jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-digester-1.5-3jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-fileupload-1.0-1jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-logging-1.0.3-4jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-modeler-1.1-2jpp.noarch.rpm jakarta-commons-pool-1.0.1-5jpp.noarch.rpm java-1.4.2-sun-1.4.2.01-7jpp.nosrc.rpm javamail-1.3.1-1jpp.nosrc.rpm jpackage-utils-1.5.27-1jpp.noarch.rpm jta-1.0.1-0.b.3jpp.nosrc.rpm mx4j-1.1.1-5jpp.noarch.rpm regexp-1.3-1jpp.noarch.rpm servletapi4-4.0.4-3jpp.noarch.rpm tomcat4-4.1.27-2jpp.noarch.rpm tyrex-1.0-3jpp.noarch.rpm xalan-j2-2.5.1-1jpp.noarch.rpm xerces-j2-2.4.0-3jpp.noarch.rpm xml-commons-1.0-0.b2.6jpp.noarch.rpm xml-commons-apis-1.0-0.b2.6jpp.noarch.rpm If you wish to use an older JVM version, choose the nosrc RPM that you wish to use; you may also need to include the following nosrc RPMs for required extensions and libraries depending on the JVM version: jaas-ext-1.0.1-2jpp.nosrc.rpm jdbc-stdext-ext-2.0-12jpp.nosrc.rpm jndi-ext-1.2.1-10jpp.nosrc.rpm jsse-ext-1.0.3.01-5jpp.nosrc.rpm ldapjdk-4.1-5jpp.noarch.rpm oro-2.0.7-1jpp.noarch.rpm --- 3. Download the following binary sources from the Sun j2sdk and appropriate product web sites: j2sdk-1_4_2_01-linux-i586.bin jaf-1_0_2.zip javamail-1_3_1.zip jta-1_0_1B-classes.zip Again, you may also need to download these if you are using older JVM versions: jaas-1_0_01.zip jdbc2_0-stdext.jar jndi-1_2_1.zip jsse-1_0_3_02-do.zip, (or jsse-1_0_3_02-gl.zip) --- 4. Install the require Jpackage utility RPM: su - Password: rpm -U jpackage-utils-1.5.27-1jpp.noarch.rpm exit --- 5. Because we are going to build binary RPMs using the nosrc RPMs and the downloaded binary sources, we need a standard host RPM directory structure. Note that the following RPM building steps should be done in a user directory and not as root on your machine! More details for these steps can be found on the www.jpackage.org web site. Here are the commands to prepare the RPM environment: mkdir ~/rpm mkdir ~/rpm/BUILD mkdir ~/rpm/RPMS mkdir ~/rpm/RPMS/i386 mkdir ~/rpm/RPMS
RE: Is Tomcat a standalone Web Server also?
Yes, just change to port 8080 to 80 .. it looks better.. -Original Message- From: Agarwal, Naresh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 2:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Is Tomcat a standalone Web Server also? Hi Can I use Tomcat as a standalone WebServer? regards, Naresh Agarwal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is Tomcat a standalone Web Server also?
Yes offcourse. Further, I think J2EE Server is all but Tomcat implementation ;) Hassan - Original Message - From: Agarwal, Naresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 7:36 AM Subject: Is Tomcat a standalone Web Server also? Hi Can I use Tomcat as a standalone WebServer? regards, Naresh Agarwal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat 3.2.1 Standalone with SSL , Genuine Signed Certificate
Hi, I have been having a problem with getting tomcat 3.2.1 to work with SSL in standalone. Previously we had used Apache for our SSL, but have had some difficulties with this lately. Due to the fact that SSL was the only thing we used Apache for, we decided to investigate running SSL on tomcat standalone. If I generate a self signed certificate using the keytool in jdk 1.3, I can run ssl on tomcat standalone. The problem arises when I then generate a certificate signing request and send it to our certificate provider. They return a signed certificate which I then install, according to the instructions given both in the tomcat docs and in the keytool docs. This seems ok, but on closer examination of the SSL connection between tomcat and the browser, I see that it is the original self signed certificate which is being used to run the connection, the valid (and expensive!) real certificate is having no influence on the process. I can remove the paid for cert and ssl still works, I can then replace it and then remove the self signed cert and ssl breaks. From browsing the tomcat docs and searching the archives of this list it appears that many people have had this problem, but none of the solutions offered have been satisfactory for me. We may at this stage revert to letting Apache do the SSL, but we feel as though we are very close to getting tomcat to work and this would provide us with a neater solution. Does anyone know of any standalone tomcat ssl installations that are using commercially signed certificates rather than the self signed certificates generated by the keytool? By the way I have taken a look at the page http://www.comu.de/docs/tomcat_ssl.jsp which is cited several times in the documentation. It provides an alternative to keytool for importing the keypair initially generated. This also did not work for me, even though I followed the instructions exactly. My operating system is windows 2000 pro, I have tried IE6 and Netscape 6 and 7 browsers. Tomcat version is 3.2.1, although I have tried 4.1.18, but not to the same extent. We would be happy to upgrade to 4.1.18 if it will solve our problem. With Netscape the errors are more useful, the certificate is loaded from the server, I can examine it and all appears well, but then an error code -12227 is displayed when I click the ok button. IE just gives a page cannot be displayed error. The tomcat console displays the following 2 lines for each attempt to connect: 2003-03-26 11:35:02 - Ctx( ): 400 R( /) null 2003-03-26 11:35:02 - Ctx( ): IOException in: R( /) Socket closed Any help on this would be greatly appreciated, not only by me as I think there are plenty of other users out there experiencing similar difficulty. Apologies for the long mail, but I wanted to get as much detail in as possible. Regards Anthony Nolan This E-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this E-mail in error please notify us immediately and delete this E-mail from your system. Thank you. It is possible for data transmitted by email to be deliberately or accidentally corrupted or intercepted. For this reason, where the communication is by E-mail, the Big Picture Group does not accept any responsibility for any breach of confidence which may arise through the use of this medium. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Big Picture Group shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of known computer viruses. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
webapps/host0/index.html . On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:46:28 -0500, Turner, John wrote: I'm sorry, what's wrong isn't exactly clear from your post. What should http://host0.com show besides the default welcome page? John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 4:27 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone I haven't seen this question answered yet: I'm trying to set up virtual domains with Tomcat 4.1.12. ( Not running Apache ) I have modified my server.xml file as follows. webapps/host0 contains a basic index.html . What might I be doing wrong? (http://host0.com shows the default index.jsp. ) Is there a way to see the information that Tomcat receives when http://host0.com is requested? ( thanks ) !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- !-- Normally, users must authenticate themselves to each web app individually. Uncomment the following entry if you would like a user to be authenticated the first time they encounter a resource protected by a security constraint, and then have that user identity maintained across *all* web applications contained in this virtual host. -- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
You want index.html to show instead of index.jsp? My tongue-in-cheek response is rename index.html to index.jsp. Another response would be check the welcome file element in web.xml for your webapp. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:21 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone webapps/host0/index.html . On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:46:28 -0500, Turner, John wrote: I'm sorry, what's wrong isn't exactly clear from your post. What should http://host0.com show besides the default welcome page? John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 4:27 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone I haven't seen this question answered yet: I'm trying to set up virtual domains with Tomcat 4.1.12. ( Not running Apache ) I have modified my server.xml file as follows. webapps/host0 contains a basic index.html . What might I be doing wrong? (http://host0.com shows the default index.jsp. ) Is there a way to see the information that Tomcat receives when http://host0.com is requested? ( thanks ) !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- !-- Normally, users must authenticate themselves to each web app individually. Uncomment the following entry if you would like a user to be authenticated the first time they encounter a resource protected by a security constraint, and then have that user identity maintained across *all* web applications contained in this virtual host. -- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Hmm. I think the answer to your question is no -- I am trying to get a very basic version of virtual domains working. I noted in the past that renaming index.jsp to index.notjsp and putting an index.html file in the /ROOT directory resulted in tomcat loading index.html. So... I'm trying to load index.html in a directory where no index.jsp exists. ( Should have the same result: [webapps/host0/]index.html should be loaded, assuming that Tomcat process the virtual host as I want it to. ) BTW: If I want a .jsp to be loaded instead of an .htm or .html (default behavior?) if both exist in the directory, Do I need that step with the web.xml file? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:28:11 -0500, Turner, John wrote: You want index.html to show instead of index.jsp? My tongue-in-cheek response is rename index.html to index.jsp. Another response would be check the welcome file element in web.xml for your webapp. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:21 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone webapps/host0/index.html . On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:46:28 -0500, Turner, John wrote: I'm sorry, what's wrong isn't exactly clear from your post. What should http://host0.com show besides the default welcome page? John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 4:27 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone I haven't seen this question answered yet: I'm trying to set up virtual domains with Tomcat 4.1.12. ( Not running Apache ) I have modified my server.xml file as follows. webapps/host0 contains a basic index.html . What might I be doing wrong? (http://host0.com shows the default index.jsp. ) Is there a way to see the information that Tomcat receives when http://host0.com is requested? ( thanks ) !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- !-- Normally, users must authenticate themselves to each web app individually. Uncomment the following entry if you would like a user to be authenticated the first time they encounter a resource protected by a security constraint, and then have that user identity maintained across *all* web applications contained in this virtual host. -- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Sorry, maybe someone else can answer your question. I'm just not understanding the problem. I have a RH 7.3 test box setup, with two virtual hosts (one is localhost, the other is some.server.com), and the welcome files display correctly. If it isn't working for you, I would suggest that the issue is with your virtual hosting configuration, not your welcome file/index.html configuration. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:03 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Hmm. I think the answer to your question is no -- I am trying to get a very basic version of virtual domains working. I noted in the past that renaming index.jsp to index.notjsp and putting an index.html file in the /ROOT directory resulted in tomcat loading index.html. So... I'm trying to load index.html in a directory where no index.jsp exists. ( Should have the same result: [webapps/host0/]index.html should be loaded, assuming that Tomcat process the virtual host as I want it to. ) BTW: If I want a .jsp to be loaded instead of an .htm or .html (default behavior?) if both exist in the directory, Do I need that step with the web.xml file? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
That sounds almost exactly like what I'm trying to do. Does your test box setup also have Apache installed? If not, what did you do to get some.server.com showing up? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:14:08 -0500, Turner, John wrote: Sorry, maybe someone else can answer your question. I'm just not understanding the problem. I have a RH 7.3 test box setup, with two virtual hosts (one is localhost, the other is some.server.com), and the welcome files display correctly. If it isn't working for you, I would suggest that the issue is with your virtual hosting configuration, not your welcome file/index.html configuration. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:03 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Hmm. I think the answer to your question is no -- I am trying to get a very basic version of virtual domains working. I noted in the past that renaming index.jsp to index.notjsp and putting an index.html file in the /ROOT directory resulted in tomcat loading index.html. So... I'm trying to load index.html in a directory where no index.jsp exists. ( Should have the same result: [webapps/host0/]index.html should be loaded, assuming that Tomcat process the virtual host as I want it to. ) BTW: If I want a .jsp to be loaded instead of an .htm or .html (default behavior?) if both exist in the directory, Do I need that step with the web.xml file? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache. If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and add a Host element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the URL. Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as localhost, add an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml. Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking) Host name=some.server.com ...some stuff here like Contexts, etc /Host The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already in it. The default server.xml file has a single virtual host (localhost) with a three Contexts (admin, manager, examples). Copy what you need from that. The Host element for localhost has a lot of stuff in it, probably stuff you don't need. Just delete most of it, and you should be fine. Alternatively, find the localhost Host element in server.xml and change the name parameter from localhost to your.server.com, restart Tomcat, and test it out and see if the behavior is what you want, then just copy that. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:20 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone That sounds almost exactly like what I'm trying to do. Does your test box setup also have Apache installed? If not, what did you do to get some.server.com showing up? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:14:08 -0500, Turner, John wrote: Sorry, maybe someone else can answer your question. I'm just not understanding the problem. I have a RH 7.3 test box setup, with two virtual hosts (one is localhost, the other is some.server.com), and the welcome files display correctly. If it isn't working for you, I would suggest that the issue is with your virtual hosting configuration, not your welcome file/index.html configuration. John -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
check out conf/web.xml and its welcome-file-list. there you can set the order of welcome pages to load.(index,jsp first, then index.html, etc) Charlie -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:03 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Hmm. I think the answer to your question is no -- I am trying to get a very basic version of virtual domains working. I noted in the past that renaming index.jsp to index.notjsp and putting an index.html file in the /ROOT directory resulted in tomcat loading index.html. So... I'm trying to load index.html in a directory where no index.jsp exists. ( Should have the same result: [webapps/host0/]index.html should be loaded, assuming that Tomcat process the virtual host as I want it to. ) BTW: If I want a .jsp to be loaded instead of an .htm or .html (default behavior?) if both exist in the directory, Do I need that step with the web.xml file? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:28:11 -0500, Turner, John wrote: You want index.html to show instead of index.jsp? My tongue-in-cheek response is rename index.html to index.jsp. Another response would be check the welcome file element in web.xml for your webapp. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:21 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone webapps/host0/index.html . On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:46:28 -0500, Turner, John wrote: I'm sorry, what's wrong isn't exactly clear from your post. What should http://host0.com show besides the default welcome page? John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 4:27 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone I haven't seen this question answered yet: I'm trying to set up virtual domains with Tomcat 4.1.12. ( Not running Apache ) I have modified my server.xml file as follows. webapps/host0 contains a basic index.html . What might I be doing wrong? (http://host0.com shows the default index.jsp. ) Is there a way to see the information that Tomcat receives when http://host0.com is requested? ( thanks ) !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- !-- Normally, users must authenticate themselves to each web app individually. Uncomment the following entry if you would like a user to be authenticated the first time they encounter a resource protected by a security constraint, and then have that user identity maintained across *all* web applications contained in this virtual host. -- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file: !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host tag? If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken? (ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting from the request?) As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only one host was used? Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be different hosts for Tomcat. Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is screwed on my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point... On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote: It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache. If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and add a Host element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the URL. Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as localhost, add an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml. Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking) Host name=some.server.com ...some stuff here like Contexts, etc /Host The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already in it. The default server.xml file has a single virtual host (localhost) with a three Contexts (admin, manager, examples). Copy what you need from that. The Host element for localhost has a lot of stuff in it, probably stuff you don't need. Just delete most of it, and you should be fine. Alternatively, find the localhost Host element in server.xml and change the name parameter from localhost to your.server.com, restart Tomcat, and test it out and see if the behavior is what you want, then just copy that. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:20 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone That sounds almost exactly like what I'm trying to do. Does your test box setup also have Apache installed? If not, what did you do to get some.server.com showing up? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:14:08 -0500, Turner, John wrote: Sorry, maybe someone else can answer your question. I'm just not understanding the problem. I have a RH 7.3 test box setup, with two virtual hosts (one is localhost, the other is some.server.com), and the welcome files display correctly. If it isn't working for you, I would suggest that the issue is with your virtual hosting configuration, not your welcome file/index.html configuration. John -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
I *don't* want to change that order. On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:55:06 -0500, Cox, Charlie wrote: check out conf/web.xml and its welcome-file-list. there you can set the order of welcome pages to load.(index,jsp first, then index.html, etc) Charlie -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:03 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Hmm. I think the answer to your question is no -- I am trying to get a very basic version of virtual domains working. I noted in the past that renaming index.jsp to index.notjsp and putting an index.html file in the /ROOT directory resulted in tomcat loading index.html. So... I'm trying to load index.html in a directory where no index.jsp exists. ( Should have the same result: [webapps/host0/]index.html should be loaded, assuming that Tomcat process the virtual host as I want it to. ) BTW: If I want a .jsp to be loaded instead of an .htm or .html (default behavior?) if both exist in the directory, Do I need that step with the web.xml file? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:28:11 -0500, Turner, John wrote: You want index.html to show instead of index.jsp? My tongue-in- cheek response is rename index.html to index.jsp. Another response would be check the welcome file element in web.xml for your webapp. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:21 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone webapps/host0/index.html . On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:46:28 -0500, Turner, John wrote: I'm sorry, what's wrong isn't exactly clear from your post. What should http://host0.com show besides the default welcome page? John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 4:27 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone I haven't seen this question answered yet: I'm trying to set up virtual domains with Tomcat 4.1.12. ( Not running Apache ) I have modified my server.xml file as follows. webapps/host0 contains a basic index.html . What might I be doing wrong? (http://host0.com shows the default index.jsp. ) Is there a way to see the information that Tomcat receives when http://host0.com is requested? ( thanks ) !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- !-- Normally, users must authenticate themselves to each web app individually. Uncomment the following entry if you would like a user to be authenticated the first time they encounter a resource protected by a security constraint, and then have that user identity maintained across *all* web applications contained in this virtual host. -- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 11/13/2002 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the defaultHost Hari -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file: !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host tag? If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken? (ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting from the request?) As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only one host was used? Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be different hosts for Tomcat. Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is screwed on my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point... On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote: It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache. If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and add a Host element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the URL. Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as localhost, add an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml. Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking) Host name=some.server.com ...some stuff here like Contexts, etc /Host The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already in it. The default server.xml file has a single virtual host (localhost) with a three Contexts (admin, manager, examples). Copy what you need from that. The Host element for localhost has a lot of stuff in it, probably stuff you don't need. Just delete most of it, and you should be fine. Alternatively, find the localhost Host element in server.xml and change the name parameter from localhost to your.server.com, restart Tomcat, and test it out and see if the behavior is what you want, then just copy that. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:20 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone That sounds almost exactly like what I'm trying to do. Does your test box setup also have Apache installed? If not, what did you do to get some.server.com showing up? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:14:08 -0500, Turner, John wrote: Sorry, maybe someone else can answer your question. I'm just not understanding the problem. I have a RH 7.3 test box setup, with two virtual hosts (one is localhost, the other is some.server.com), and the welcome files display correctly. If it isn't working for you, I would suggest that the issue is with your virtual hosting configuration, not your welcome file/index.html configuration. John -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Hari: Thanks for the response. ( For that matter, thanks for everyone's response so far... ) I want the behavior to be: http://localhost - loads up the default welcome page, root/index.jsp http://host0.com - loads up host0's index page http://host1.com - loads up host1's index page Is changing the default host part of the solution? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote: You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the defaultHost Hari -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file: !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host tag? If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken? (ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting from the request?) As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only one host was used? Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be different hosts for Tomcat. Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is screwed on my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point... On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote: It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache. If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and add a Host element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the URL. Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as localhost, add an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml. Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking) Host name=some.server.com ...some stuff here like Contexts, etc /Host The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already in it. The default server.xml file has a single virtual host (localhost) with a three Contexts (admin, manager, examples). Copy what you need from that. The Host element for localhost has a lot of stuff in it, probably stuff you don't need. Just delete most of it, and you should be fine. Alternatively, find the localhost Host element in server.xml and change the name parameter from localhost to your.server.com, restart Tomcat, and test it out and see if the behavior is what you want, then just copy that. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:20 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone That sounds almost exactly like what I'm trying to do. Does your test box setup also have Apache installed? If not, what did you do to get some.server.com showing up? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:14:08 -0500, Turner, John wrote: Sorry, maybe someone else can answer your question. I'm just not understanding the problem. I have a RH 7.3 test box setup, with two virtual hosts (one is localhost, the other is some.server.com), and the welcome files display correctly. If it isn't working for you, I would suggest that the issue is with your virtual hosting configuration, not your welcome file/index.html configuration. John -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
I really don't know if changing the defaulthost name is the solution. R u able to serve the pages with the configuration you have now without changing the defaulthost name or are you getting a DNS error. IF you want to serve pages the way you want it, then each of the host entries you have in server.xml should have context defined with its own Web.xml file. Hari -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:36 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Hari: Thanks for the response. ( For that matter, thanks for everyone's response so far... ) I want the behavior to be: http://localhost - loads up the default welcome page, root/index.jsp http://host0.com - loads up host0's index page http://host1.com - loads up host1's index page Is changing the default host part of the solution? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote: You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the defaultHost Hari -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file: !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host tag? If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken? (ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting from the request?) As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only one host was used? Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be different hosts for Tomcat. Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is screwed on my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point... On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote: It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache. If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and add a Host element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the URL. Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as localhost, add an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml. Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking) Host name=some.server.com ...some stuff here like Contexts, etc /Host The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already in it. The default server.xml file has a single virtual host (localhost) with a three Contexts (admin, manager, examples). Copy what you need from that. The Host element for localhost has a lot of stuff in it, probably stuff you don't need. Just delete most of it, and you should be fine. Alternatively, find the localhost Host element in server.xml and change the name parameter from localhost to your.server.com, restart Tomcat, and test it out and see if the behavior is what you want, then just copy that. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:20 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone That sounds almost exactly like what I'm trying to do. Does your test box setup also have Apache installed? If not, what did you do to get some.server.com showing up? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:14:08 -0500, Turner, John wrote: Sorry, maybe someone else can answer your question. I'm just not understanding the problem. I have a RH 7.3 test box setup, with two virtual hosts (one is localhost, the other is some.server.com), and the welcome files display correctly. If it isn't working for you, I would suggest that the issue is with your virtual hosting configuration, not your welcome file/index.html configuration. John -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
No, you want defaultHost to be localhost, or some other name. defaultHost has nothing to do with virtual hosts. One Engine can have multiple Hosts, each Host can have multiple Contexts. John -Original Message- From: Hari Venkatesan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:22 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the defaultHost Hari -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file: !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host tag? If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken? (ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting from the request?) As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only one host was used? Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be different hosts for Tomcat. Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is screwed on my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point... On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote: It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache. If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and add a Host element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the URL. Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as localhost, add an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml. Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking) Host name=some.server.com ...some stuff here like Contexts, etc /Host The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already in it. The default server.xml file has a single virtual host (localhost) with a three Contexts (admin, manager, examples). Copy what you need from that. The Host element for localhost has a lot of stuff in it, probably stuff you don't need. Just delete most of it, and you should be fine. Alternatively, find the localhost Host element in server.xml and change the name parameter from localhost to your.server.com, restart Tomcat, and test it out and see if the behavior is what you want, then just copy that. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:20 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone That sounds almost exactly like what I'm trying to do. Does your test box setup also have Apache installed? If not, what did you do to get some.server.com showing up? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:14:08 -0500, Turner, John wrote: Sorry, maybe someone else can answer your question. I'm just not understanding the problem. I have a RH 7.3 test box setup, with two virtual hosts (one is localhost, the other is some.server.com), and the welcome files display correctly. If it isn't working for you, I would suggest that the issue is with your virtual hosting configuration, not your welcome file/index.html configuration. John -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
No, it is not. Leave defaultHost alone. Setup a Host element for host0.com and host1.com. If this is not working, either post your entire server.xml or post log file snippets with error messages. XML files are sensitive to properly closed tags and elements...including just a small snippet of your server.xml file doesn't let anyone verify that you've positioned and closed the new tags correctly because we can't see any of the other tags. My apologies, but this is starting to get fairly tedious. Adding a new Host element is a trivial exercise, all you have to do is make sure you position it correctly and close it correctly. There's really nothing else to do. If you have to, copy server.xml to server-work.xml, delete all of the comments and other extra information, and work with the resulting smaller file until you get the new elements closed and positioned correctly. Server.xml is no different than and HTML file...position and close everything properly, and it works. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:36 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Hari: Thanks for the response. ( For that matter, thanks for everyone's response so far... ) I want the behavior to be: http://localhost - loads up the default welcome page, root/index.jsp http://host0.com - loads up host0's index page http://host1.com - loads up host1's index page Is changing the default host part of the solution? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote: You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the defaultHost Hari -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file: !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host tag? If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken? (ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting from the request?) As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only one host was used? Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be different hosts for Tomcat. Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is screwed on my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point... On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote: It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache. If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and add a Host element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the URL. Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as localhost, add an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml. Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking) Host name=some.server.com ...some stuff here like Contexts, etc /Host The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already in it. The default server.xml file has a single virtual host (localhost) with a three Contexts (admin, manager, examples). Copy what you need from that. The Host element for localhost has a lot of stuff in it, probably stuff you don't need. Just delete most of it, and you should be fine. Alternatively, find the localhost Host element in server.xml and change the name parameter from localhost to your.server.com, restart Tomcat, and test it out and see if the behavior is what you want, then just copy that. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:20 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone That sounds almost exactly like what I'm trying to do. Does your test box setup also have Apache installed? If not, what did you do to get some.server.com showing up? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:14:08 -0500, Turner, John wrote: Sorry, maybe someone else can answer your question. I'm just not understanding the problem. I have a RH 7.3 test box setup, with two virtual hosts (one is localhost, the other is some.server.com), and the welcome files display correctly
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Changing defaultHost is not the solution. John -Original Message- From: Hari Venkatesan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:51 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone I really don't know if changing the defaulthost name is the solution. R u able to serve the pages with the configuration you have now without changing the defaulthost name or are you getting a DNS error. IF you want to serve pages the way you want it, then each of the host entries you have in server.xml should have context defined with its own Web.xml file. Hari -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:36 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Hari: Thanks for the response. ( For that matter, thanks for everyone's response so far... ) I want the behavior to be: http://localhost - loads up the default welcome page, root/index.jsp http://host0.com - loads up host0's index page http://host1.com - loads up host1's index page Is changing the default host part of the solution? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote: You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the defaultHost Hari -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file: !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host tag? If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken? (ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting from the request?) As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only one host was used? Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be different hosts for Tomcat. Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is screwed on my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point... On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote: It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache. If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and add a Host element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the URL. Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as localhost, add an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml. Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking) Host name=some.server.com ...some stuff here like Contexts, etc /Host The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already in it. The default server.xml file has a single virtual host (localhost) with a three Contexts (admin, manager, examples). Copy what you need from that. The Host element for localhost has a lot of stuff in it, probably stuff you don't need. Just delete most of it, and you should be fine. Alternatively, find the localhost Host element in server.xml and change the name parameter from localhost to your.server.com, restart Tomcat, and test it out and see if the behavior is what you want, then just copy that. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:20 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone That sounds almost exactly like what I'm trying to do. Does your test box setup also have Apache installed? If not, what did you do to get some.server.com showing up? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:14:08 -0500, Turner, John wrote: Sorry, maybe someone else can answer your question. I'm just not understanding the problem. I have a RH 7.3 test box setup, with two virtual hosts (one is localhost, the other is some.server.com), and the welcome files display correctly. If it isn't working for you, I would suggest that the issue is with your virtual hosting configuration, not your welcome file/index.html configuration. John -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
If I leave the defaultHost to localhost and have a host name=something.com, when I
type in the url http://something.com/{webapp}/index.jsp, I get a server not found or
DNS error. Do I need to define something.com anywhere else in win2000
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:04 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Changing defaultHost is not the solution.
John
-Original Message-
From: Hari Venkatesan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
I really don't know if changing the defaulthost name is the
solution. R u able to serve the pages with the configuration
you have now without changing the defaulthost name or are you
getting a DNS error.
IF you want to serve pages the way you want it, then each of
the host entries you have in server.xml should have
context defined with its own Web.xml file.
Hari
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Hari:
Thanks for the response.
( For that matter, thanks for everyone's response so far... )
I want the behavior to be:
http://localhost - loads up the default welcome page, root/index.jsp
http://host0.com - loads up host0's index page
http://host1.com - loads up host1's index page
Is changing the default host part of the solution?
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote:
You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the
host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone
defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the
defaultHost
Hari
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file:
!-- Define the default virtual host --
Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps
unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true
!-- This part is added: --
Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0
unpackWARs=true
Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger
directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/
Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0
reloadable=true/
Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0
reloadable=true/
/Host
!-- End, added part. --
Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host
tag?
If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken?
(ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting from
the request?)
As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only
one host was used?
Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be different hosts
for Tomcat.
Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is screwed on
my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point...
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote:
It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using
http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache.
If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and
add a Host
element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the
URL.
Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as
localhost, add
an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml.
Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking)
Host name=some.server.com
...some stuff here like Contexts, etc
/Host
The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already in
it. The
default server.xml file has a single virtual host (localhost) with a
three
Contexts (admin, manager, examples). Copy what you need from that.
The
Host element for localhost has a lot of stuff in it, probably stuff
you
don't need. Just delete most of it, and you should be fine.
Alternatively,
find the localhost Host element in server.xml and change the name
parameter
from localhost to your.server.com, restart Tomcat, and test it
out and
see if the behavior is what you want, then just copy that.
John
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
That sounds almost exactly like what I'm trying to do. Does
your test box setup also have Apache installed? If not, what
did you do to get some.server.com showing up?
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:14:08 -0500, Turner, John wrote:
Sorry, maybe someone else can answer your question. I'm just not
understanding the problem. I have a RH 7.3 test box setup, with
two
virtual
hosts
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Got it, John. Thanks for your time. ( not being sarcastic... forgot to thank you earlier. ) ( For the record, I only posted the small snippet because that was all that I changed from out of the box ) I'll try to verify the XML tags now. ( I've thought about this before, but I'll look at it again. ) I thought that maybe I had something screwy going on with part of the request being blocked, but I honestly don't know that part intimately enough to look at it and verify that everything is coming through ok. On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:03:06 -0500, Turner, John wrote: No, it is not. Leave defaultHost alone. Setup a Host element for host0.com and host1.com. If this is not working, either post your entire server.xml or post log file snippets with error messages. XML files are sensitive to properly closed tags and elements...including just a small snippet of your server.xml file doesn't let anyone verify that you've positioned and closed the new tags correctly because we can't see any of the other tags. My apologies, but this is starting to get fairly tedious. Adding a new Host element is a trivial exercise, all you have to do is make sure you position it correctly and close it correctly. There's really nothing else to do. If you have to, copy server.xml to server-work.xml, delete all of the comments and other extra information, and work with the resulting smaller file until you get the new elements closed and positioned correctly. Server.xml is no different than and HTML file...position and close everything properly, and it works. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:36 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Hari: Thanks for the response. ( For that matter, thanks for everyone's response so far... ) I want the behavior to be: http://localhost - loads up the default welcome page, root/index.jsp http://host0.com - loads up host0's index page http://host1.com - loads up host1's index page Is changing the default host part of the solution? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote: You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the defaultHost Hari -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file: !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host tag? If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken? (ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting from the request?) As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only one host was used? Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be different hosts for Tomcat. Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is screwed on my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point... On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote: It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache. If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and add a Host element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the URL. Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as localhost, add an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml. Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking) Host name=some.server.com ...some stuff here like Contexts, etc /Host The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already in it. The default server.xml file has a single virtual host (localhost) with a three Contexts (admin, manager, examples). Copy what you need from that. The Host element for localhost has a lot of stuff in it, probably stuff you don't need. Just delete most of it, and you should be fine. Alternatively, find the localhost Host element in server.xml and change the name parameter from localhost to your.server.com, restart Tomcat, and test it out and see if the behavior is what you want, then just copy that. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:20 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone That sounds almost exactly
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Hari:
My guess is that something.com would need to have a DNS record in a nameserver (
that resolves to the box that you have Tomcat on. )
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:09:30 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote:
If I leave the defaultHost to localhost and have a host
name=something.com, when I type in the url
http://something.com/{webapp}/index.jsp, I get a server not found or
DNS error. Do I need to define something.com anywhere else in win2000
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:04 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Changing defaultHost is not the solution.
John
-Original Message-
From: Hari Venkatesan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
I really don't know if changing the defaulthost name is the
solution. R u able to serve the pages with the configuration
you have now without changing the defaulthost name or are you
getting a DNS error.
IF you want to serve pages the way you want it, then each of
the host entries you have in server.xml should have
context defined with its own Web.xml file.
Hari
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Hari:
Thanks for the response.
( For that matter, thanks for everyone's response so far... )
I want the behavior to be:
http://localhost - loads up the default welcome page,
root/index.jsp
http://host0.com - loads up host0's index page
http://host1.com - loads up host1's index page
Is changing the default host part of the solution?
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote:
You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the
host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone
defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the
defaultHost
Hari
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file:
!-- Define the default virtual host --
Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps
unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true
!-- This part is added: --
Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0
unpackWARs=true
Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger
directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/
Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0
reloadable=true/
Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0
reloadable=true/
/Host
!-- End, added part. --
Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host
tag?
If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken?
(ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting
from
the request?)
As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only
one host was used?
Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be different
hosts
for Tomcat.
Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is screwed
on
my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point...
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote:
It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using
http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache.
If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and
add a Host
element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the
URL.
Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as
localhost, add
an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml.
Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking)
Host name=some.server.com
...some stuff here like Contexts, etc
/Host
The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already
in
it. The
default server.xml file has a single virtual host (localhost)
with a
three
Contexts (admin, manager, examples). Copy what you need from
that.
The
Host element for localhost has a lot of stuff in it, probably
stuff
you
don't need. Just delete most of it, and you should be fine.
Alternatively,
find the localhost Host element in server.xml and change the name
parameter
from localhost to your.server.com, restart Tomcat, and test
it
out and
see if the behavior is what you want, then just copy that.
John
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
That sounds almost exactly like what I'm trying to do. Does
your test box setup also have Apache installed? If not, what
did you do to get some.server.com showing up?
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:14:08 -0500, Turner, John wrote:
Sorry, maybe someone else can answer your question. I'm just
not
understanding the problem. I have
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Let's put it this way. If you had to change defaultHost for virtual hosts
to work, then you could never have more than one virtual host, since there
is only one defaultHost. That's obviously wrong. Tomcat has the ability to
serve many virtual hosts, not just one. I have several virtual hosts running
on a Sun 420R at the moment, and there's only one defaultHost (and it's set
to localhost).
If you are getting server not found then something.com doesn't resolve to
an IP address. Can you ping something.com? If not, there's your answer.
If something.com resolved to the IP address where Tomcat was running, and
there was no virtual host defined, then Tomcat would revert to serving the
default context from the default host. That's what defaultHost does.
John
-Original Message-
From: Hari Venkatesan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
If I leave the defaultHost to localhost and have a host
name=something.com, when I type in the url
http://something.com/{webapp}/index.jsp, I get a server not
found or DNS error. Do I need to define something.com
anywhere else in win2000
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:04 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Changing defaultHost is not the solution.
John
-Original Message-
From: Hari Venkatesan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
I really don't know if changing the defaulthost name is the
solution. R u able to serve the pages with the configuration
you have now without changing the defaulthost name or are you
getting a DNS error.
IF you want to serve pages the way you want it, then each of
the host entries you have in server.xml should have
context defined with its own Web.xml file.
Hari
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Hari:
Thanks for the response.
( For that matter, thanks for everyone's response so far... )
I want the behavior to be:
http://localhost - loads up the default welcome page, root/index.jsp
http://host0.com - loads up host0's index page
http://host1.com - loads up host1's index page
Is changing the default host part of the solution?
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote:
You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the
host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone
defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the
defaultHost
Hari
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file:
!-- Define the default virtual host --
Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps
unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true
!-- This part is added: --
Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0
unpackWARs=true
Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger
directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/
Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0
reloadable=true/
Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0
reloadable=true/
/Host
!-- End, added part. --
Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host
tag?
If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken?
(ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting from
the request?)
As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only
one host was used?
Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be
different hosts
for Tomcat.
Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is
screwed on
my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point...
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote:
It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using
http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache.
If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and
add a Host
element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the
URL.
Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as
localhost, add
an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml.
Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking)
Host name=some.server.com
...some stuff here like Contexts, etc
/Host
The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Exactly.
John
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Hari:
My guess is that something.com would need to have a DNS
record in a nameserver ( that resolves to the box that you
have Tomcat on. )
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:09:30 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote:
If I leave the defaultHost to localhost and have a host
name=something.com, when I type in the url
http://something.com/{webapp}/index.jsp, I get a server not found or
DNS error. Do I need to define something.com anywhere else in win2000
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:04 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Changing defaultHost is not the solution.
John
-Original Message-
From: Hari Venkatesan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
I really don't know if changing the defaulthost name is the
solution. R u able to serve the pages with the configuration
you have now without changing the defaulthost name or are you
getting a DNS error.
IF you want to serve pages the way you want it, then each of
the host entries you have in server.xml should have
context defined with its own Web.xml file.
Hari
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Hari:
Thanks for the response.
( For that matter, thanks for everyone's response so far... )
I want the behavior to be:
http://localhost - loads up the default welcome page,
root/index.jsp
http://host0.com - loads up host0's index page
http://host1.com - loads up host1's index page
Is changing the default host part of the solution?
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote:
You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the
host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone
defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the
defaultHost
Hari
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file:
!-- Define the default virtual host --
Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps
unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true
!-- This part is added: --
Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0
unpackWARs=true
Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger
directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/
Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0
reloadable=true/
Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0
reloadable=true/
/Host
!-- End, added part. --
Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host
tag?
If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken?
(ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting
from
the request?)
As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only
one host was used?
Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be different
hosts
for Tomcat.
Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is screwed
on
my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point...
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote:
It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using
http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache.
If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and
add a Host
element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the
URL.
Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as
localhost, add
an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml.
Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking)
Host name=some.server.com
...some stuff here like Contexts, etc
/Host
The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already
in
it. The
default server.xml file has a single virtual host (localhost)
with a
three
Contexts (admin, manager, examples). Copy what you need from
that.
The
Host element for localhost has a lot of stuff in it, probably
stuff
you
don't need. Just delete most of it, and you should be fine.
Alternatively,
find the localhost Host element in server.xml and change the name
parameter
from localhost to your.server.com, restart Tomcat, and test
it
out and
see if the behavior is what you want, then just copy that.
John
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
If you post your server.xml, someone will look at it. I can't promise I will, as time is everything, but someone will. If you could remove the comments from it and post an uncommented version, that would make it smaller and easier to scan. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:12 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Got it, John. Thanks for your time. ( not being sarcastic... forgot to thank you earlier. ) ( For the record, I only posted the small snippet because that was all that I changed from out of the box ) I'll try to verify the XML tags now. ( I've thought about this before, but I'll look at it again. ) I thought that maybe I had something screwy going on with part of the request being blocked, but I honestly don't know that part intimately enough to look at it and verify that everything is coming through ok. On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:03:06 -0500, Turner, John wrote: No, it is not. Leave defaultHost alone. Setup a Host element for host0.com and host1.com. If this is not working, either post your entire server.xml or post log file snippets with error messages. XML files are sensitive to properly closed tags and elements...including just a small snippet of your server.xml file doesn't let anyone verify that you've positioned and closed the new tags correctly because we can't see any of the other tags. My apologies, but this is starting to get fairly tedious. Adding a new Host element is a trivial exercise, all you have to do is make sure you position it correctly and close it correctly. There's really nothing else to do. If you have to, copy server.xml to server-work.xml, delete all of the comments and other extra information, and work with the resulting smaller file until you get the new elements closed and positioned correctly. Server.xml is no different than and HTML file...position and close everything properly, and it works. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:36 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Hari: Thanks for the response. ( For that matter, thanks for everyone's response so far... ) I want the behavior to be: http://localhost - loads up the default welcome page, root/index.jsp http://host0.com - loads up host0's index page http://host1.com - loads up host1's index page Is changing the default host part of the solution? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote: You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the defaultHost Hari -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file: !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host tag? If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken? (ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting from the request?) As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only one host was used? Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be different hosts for Tomcat. Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is screwed on my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point... On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote: It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache. If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and add a Host element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the URL. Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as localhost, add an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml. Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking) Host name=some.server.com ...some stuff here like Contexts, etc /Host The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already in it. The default server.xml file has a single virtual host (localhost) with a three Contexts (admin, manager, examples). Copy what
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Thanks for the reply john. I got it. But there is one small problem yet to resolve.
When I use http://something.com/{Webapp}/index.jsp, it comes back with a Basic Server
Authentication window. I don't have any authentication setup in web.xml file.
I am using IIS and tomcat and have defined virtualhost in server.xml file. If I access
the server directly by it name, it is showing me the index page but if try with the
virtualhost, I get authentication for the server. Any ideas?
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:19 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Let's put it this way. If you had to change defaultHost for virtual hosts
to work, then you could never have more than one virtual host, since there
is only one defaultHost. That's obviously wrong. Tomcat has the ability to
serve many virtual hosts, not just one. I have several virtual hosts running
on a Sun 420R at the moment, and there's only one defaultHost (and it's set
to localhost).
If you are getting server not found then something.com doesn't resolve to
an IP address. Can you ping something.com? If not, there's your answer.
If something.com resolved to the IP address where Tomcat was running, and
there was no virtual host defined, then Tomcat would revert to serving the
default context from the default host. That's what defaultHost does.
John
-Original Message-
From: Hari Venkatesan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
If I leave the defaultHost to localhost and have a host
name=something.com, when I type in the url
http://something.com/{webapp}/index.jsp, I get a server not
found or DNS error. Do I need to define something.com
anywhere else in win2000
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:04 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Changing defaultHost is not the solution.
John
-Original Message-
From: Hari Venkatesan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
I really don't know if changing the defaulthost name is the
solution. R u able to serve the pages with the configuration
you have now without changing the defaulthost name or are you
getting a DNS error.
IF you want to serve pages the way you want it, then each of
the host entries you have in server.xml should have
context defined with its own Web.xml file.
Hari
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Hari:
Thanks for the response.
( For that matter, thanks for everyone's response so far... )
I want the behavior to be:
http://localhost - loads up the default welcome page, root/index.jsp
http://host0.com - loads up host0's index page
http://host1.com - loads up host1's index page
Is changing the default host part of the solution?
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote:
You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the
host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone
defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the
defaultHost
Hari
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file:
!-- Define the default virtual host --
Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps
unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true
!-- This part is added: --
Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0
unpackWARs=true
Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger
directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/
Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0
reloadable=true/
Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0
reloadable=true/
/Host
!-- End, added part. --
Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host
tag?
If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken?
(ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting from
the request?)
As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only
one host was used?
Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be
different hosts
for Tomcat.
Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is
screwed on
my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point...
On Tue
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
It's been a long time since I setup a Windows web server, but if I had to
guess: IIS has authentication set for that resource. The anonymous web
user (IUSR_SOMEMACHINENAME) account has no access to the directories where
the content exists.
John
-Original Message-
From: Hari Venkatesan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:32 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Thanks for the reply john. I got it. But there is one small
problem yet to resolve. When I use
http://something.com/{Webapp}/index.jsp, it comes back with a
Basic Server Authentication window. I don't have any
authentication setup in web.xml file.
I am using IIS and tomcat and have defined virtualhost in
server.xml file. If I access the server directly by it name,
it is showing me the index page but if try with the
virtualhost, I get authentication for the server. Any ideas?
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:19 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Let's put it this way. If you had to change defaultHost for
virtual hosts
to work, then you could never have more than one virtual
host, since there
is only one defaultHost. That's obviously wrong. Tomcat has
the ability to
serve many virtual hosts, not just one. I have several
virtual hosts running
on a Sun 420R at the moment, and there's only one defaultHost
(and it's set
to localhost).
If you are getting server not found then something.com
doesn't resolve to
an IP address. Can you ping something.com? If not, there's
your answer.
If something.com resolved to the IP address where Tomcat
was running, and
there was no virtual host defined, then Tomcat would revert
to serving the
default context from the default host. That's what
defaultHost does.
John
-Original Message-
From: Hari Venkatesan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
If I leave the defaultHost to localhost and have a host
name=something.com, when I type in the url
http://something.com/{webapp}/index.jsp, I get a server not
found or DNS error. Do I need to define something.com
anywhere else in win2000
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:04 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Changing defaultHost is not the solution.
John
-Original Message-
From: Hari Venkatesan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
I really don't know if changing the defaulthost name is the
solution. R u able to serve the pages with the configuration
you have now without changing the defaulthost name or are you
getting a DNS error.
IF you want to serve pages the way you want it, then each of
the host entries you have in server.xml should have
context defined with its own Web.xml file.
Hari
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Hari:
Thanks for the response.
( For that matter, thanks for everyone's response so far... )
I want the behavior to be:
http://localhost - loads up the default welcome page,
root/index.jsp
http://host0.com - loads up host0's index page
http://host1.com - loads up host1's index page
Is changing the default host part of the solution?
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote:
You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the
host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone
defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect
host0.com in the
defaultHost
Hari
-Original Message-
From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file:
!-- Define the default virtual host --
Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps
unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true
!-- This part is added: --
Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0
unpackWARs=true
Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger
directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log
timestamp=true/
Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0
reloadable=true/
Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Just wanted to let you know: I got it working. I ended up uninstalling Tomcat 4.1.12 and installing Tomcat 4.1.17, and it worked almost from the start. (I'm guessing that I somehow corrupted my server.xml file.) Thanks for all your help! On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:19:56 -0500, Turner, John wrote: If you post your server.xml, someone will look at it. I can't promise I will, as time is everything, but someone will. If you could remove the comments from it and post an uncommented version, that would make it smaller and easier to scan. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:12 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Got it, John. Thanks for your time. ( not being sarcastic... forgot to thank you earlier. ) ( For the record, I only posted the small snippet because that was all that I changed from out of the box ) I'll try to verify the XML tags now. ( I've thought about this before, but I'll look at it again. ) I thought that maybe I had something screwy going on with part of the request being blocked, but I honestly don't know that part intimately enough to look at it and verify that everything is coming through ok. On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:03:06 -0500, Turner, John wrote: No, it is not. Leave defaultHost alone. Setup a Host element for host0.com and host1.com. If this is not working, either post your entire server.xml or post log file snippets with error messages. XML files are sensitive to properly closed tags and elements...including just a small snippet of your server.xml file doesn't let anyone verify that you've positioned and closed the new tags correctly because we can't see any of the other tags. My apologies, but this is starting to get fairly tedious. Adding a new Host element is a trivial exercise, all you have to do is make sure you position it correctly and close it correctly. There's really nothing else to do. If you have to, copy server.xml to server-work.xml, delete all of the comments and other extra information, and work with the resulting smaller file until you get the new elements closed and positioned correctly. Server.xml is no different than and HTML file...position and close everything properly, and it works. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:36 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Hari: Thanks for the response. ( For that matter, thanks for everyone's response so far... ) I want the behavior to be: http://localhost - loads up the default welcome page, root/index.jsp http://host0.com - loads up host0's index page http://host1.com - loads up host1's index page Is changing the default host part of the solution? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote: You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the defaultHost Hari -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file: !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host tag? If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken? (ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting from the request?) As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only one host was used? Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be different hosts for Tomcat. Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is screwed on my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point... On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote: It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache. If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and add a Host element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the URL. Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as localhost, add an Alias tag to the localhost Host element in server.xml. Apache VirtualHost = Tomcat Host (roughly speaking) Host name=some.server.com ...some stuff here like Contexts, etc /Host The server.xml that comes with Tomcat has what you need already
RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone
Congratulations Norment. R u using IIS? Hari -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:45 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Just wanted to let you know: I got it working. I ended up uninstalling Tomcat 4.1.12 and installing Tomcat 4.1.17, and it worked almost from the start. (I'm guessing that I somehow corrupted my server.xml file.) Thanks for all your help! On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:19:56 -0500, Turner, John wrote: If you post your server.xml, someone will look at it. I can't promise I will, as time is everything, but someone will. If you could remove the comments from it and post an uncommented version, that would make it smaller and easier to scan. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:12 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Got it, John. Thanks for your time. ( not being sarcastic... forgot to thank you earlier. ) ( For the record, I only posted the small snippet because that was all that I changed from out of the box ) I'll try to verify the XML tags now. ( I've thought about this before, but I'll look at it again. ) I thought that maybe I had something screwy going on with part of the request being blocked, but I honestly don't know that part intimately enough to look at it and verify that everything is coming through ok. On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:03:06 -0500, Turner, John wrote: No, it is not. Leave defaultHost alone. Setup a Host element for host0.com and host1.com. If this is not working, either post your entire server.xml or post log file snippets with error messages. XML files are sensitive to properly closed tags and elements...including just a small snippet of your server.xml file doesn't let anyone verify that you've positioned and closed the new tags correctly because we can't see any of the other tags. My apologies, but this is starting to get fairly tedious. Adding a new Host element is a trivial exercise, all you have to do is make sure you position it correctly and close it correctly. There's really nothing else to do. If you have to, copy server.xml to server-work.xml, delete all of the comments and other extra information, and work with the resulting smaller file until you get the new elements closed and positioned correctly. Server.xml is no different than and HTML file...position and close everything properly, and it works. John -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:36 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone Hari: Thanks for the response. ( For that matter, thanks for everyone's response so far... ) I want the behavior to be: http://localhost - loads up the default welcome page, root/index.jsp http://host0.com - loads up host0's index page http://host1.com - loads up host1's index page Is changing the default host part of the solution? On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:22:20 -0500, Hari Venkatesan wrote: You have two Host name defined and only one closing tag for the host. Did you change Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost debug=99 to reflect host0.com in the defaultHost Hari -Original Message- From: J. Norment [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:15 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Virtual Domains with Tomcat 4.1.12 Standalone This is the change that I had made to the server.xml file: !-- Define the default virtual host -- Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true !-- This part is added: -- Host name=host0.com debug=0 appBase=webapps/host0 unpackWARs=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=host0. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ Context path=/test docBase=webapps/host0 debug=0 reloadable=true/ /Host !-- End, added part. -- Is this is the change that you are referring to in adding the host tag? If that is not working, how would I track down what is broken? (ie, are there log files saying exactly what Tomcat is getting from the request?) As for adding an alias for localhost, wouldn't that mean that only one host was used? Ultimately, I'd like host0.com and host1.com to be different hosts for Tomcat. Applying Occam's Razor, I'm pretty sure that something is screwed on my end, but not sure how to track it down, at this point... On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:14 -0500, Turner, John wrote: It has Apache installed, but I just verified this behavior using http://some.server.com:8080 which bypasses Apache. If you need a virtual host setup in Tomcat, modify server.xml and add a Host element with a name parameter set to the FQDN that will be in the URL. Alternatively, if you want some.server.com to be treated as localhost, add an Alias
Servlet and Applet working in Tomcat 4.0.4 standalone
Hi, I am using the Tomcat 4.0.4 as a standalone-server. Esspecially because JBuilder7 supports Servlet debugging. OK. I have an webApplication that includes a client- and a server-directory (package). The server-dir contains the Servlet-Class and the client-dir contains the client, of course. This client is a java.applet and does work fine (it is startet through out a html-page). But my problem is to connect to the servlet. I have also tried to put the .war file into the %CATALINA_HOME%/webapps - folder and added the Lines !-- TOMCAT Bfpl-Context -- Context path=/myApp docBase=myApp debug=0 reloadable=true / into the server.xml. So the .war - File should be extracted at the next start of Tomcat. But that doesn't work What am I doing wrong? An other question is: How do I connect from an Applet or a java.frame (opened by the applet) to this servlet. What the adress of the servlet? So my Applet is working fine but I do not get a connection to the servlet, so I cannot get my data from the webserver. :-( I hope anyone can help me. thx Patrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RES: Servlet and Applet working in Tomcat 4.0.4 standalone
Hi, I don't know if it is it, but there is a directive called unpackWARs=true that I think you should add to your server.xml. Could anyone confirm that ? Thanks, Tiago. -Mensagem original- De: Patrick Kosiol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviada em: sexta-feira, 29 de novembro de 2002 10:18 Para: Tomcat Users List Assunto: Servlet and Applet working in Tomcat 4.0.4 standalone Hi, I am using the Tomcat 4.0.4 as a standalone-server. Esspecially because JBuilder7 supports Servlet debugging. OK. I have an webApplication that includes a client- and a server-directory (package). The server-dir contains the Servlet-Class and the client-dir contains the client, of course. This client is a java.applet and does work fine (it is startet through out a html-page). But my problem is to connect to the servlet. I have also tried to put the .war file into the %CATALINA_HOME%/webapps - folder and added the Lines !-- TOMCAT Bfpl-Context -- Context path=/myApp docBase=myApp debug=0 reloadable=true / into the server.xml. So the .war - File should be extracted at the next start of Tomcat. But that doesn't work What am I doing wrong? An other question is: How do I connect from an Applet or a java.frame (opened by the applet) to this servlet. What the adress of the servlet? So my Applet is working fine but I do not get a connection to the servlet, so I cannot get my data from the webserver. :-( I hope anyone can help me. thx Patrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RES: Servlet and Applet working in Tomcat 4.0.4 standalone
THX, that might be of course, but I am running the default settings of the Tomcat so this option is already set TRUE. That is not the problem. Because of that I don't understand why it doesn't unpack the war-file But without the WAR-File can I also put my webapp onto the server? And how do I do that? thx Patrick Tiago Ferraz Machado wrote: Hi, I don't know if it is it, but there is a directive called unpackWARs=true that I think you should add to your server.xml. Could anyone confirm that ? Thanks, Tiago. -Mensagem original- De: Patrick Kosiol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviada em: sexta-feira, 29 de novembro de 2002 10:18 Para: Tomcat Users List Assunto: Servlet and Applet working in Tomcat 4.0.4 standalone Hi, I am using the Tomcat 4.0.4 as a standalone-server. Esspecially because JBuilder7 supports Servlet debugging. OK. I have an webApplication that includes a client- and a server-directory (package). The server-dir contains the Servlet-Class and the client-dir contains the client, of course. This client is a java.applet and does work fine (it is startet through out a html-page). But my problem is to connect to the servlet. I have also tried to put the .war file into the %CATALINA_HOME%/webapps - folder and added the Lines !-- TOMCAT Bfpl-Context -- Context path=/myApp docBase=myApp debug=0 reloadable=true / into the server.xml. So the .war - File should be extracted at the next start of Tomcat. But that doesn't work What am I doing wrong? An other question is: How do I connect from an Applet or a java.frame (opened by the applet) to this servlet. What the adress of the servlet? So my Applet is working fine but I do not get a connection to the servlet, so I cannot get my data from the webserver. :-( I hope anyone can help me. thx Patrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Servlet and Applet working in Tomcat 4.0.4 standalone
Patrick Kosiol writes: Hi, I am using the Tomcat 4.0.4 as a standalone-server. Esspecially because JBuilder7 supports Servlet debugging. OK. I have an webApplication that includes a client- and a server-directory (package). The server-dir contains the Servlet-Class and the client-dir contains the client, of course. This client is a java.applet and does work fine (it is startet through out a html-page). But my problem is to connect to the servlet. I have also tried to put the .war file into the %CATALINA_HOME%/webapps - folder and added the Lines !-- TOMCAT Bfpl-Context -- Context path=/myApp docBase=myApp debug=0 reloadable=true / into the server.xml. So the .war - File should be extracted at the next start of Tomcat. But that doesn't work What am I doing wrong? An other question is: How do I connect from an Applet or a java.frame (opened by the applet) to this servlet. What the adress of the servlet? So my Applet is working fine but I do not get a connection to the servlet, so I cannot get my data from the webserver. :-( I hope anyone can help me. thx Patrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Patrick, based on ur info i have to make some assumptions. from ur statment: I have also tried to put the .war file into the %CATALINA_HOME%/webapps - folder... and on: So the .war - File should be extracted at the next start of Tomcat. But that doesn't work... i am compelled to ask: does the .war expanded into something expected like: $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp? if not, this is the source of ur problem. if u do get expansion does this exist?: $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF/web.xml? if not, this is the source of ur problem. if u do have a web.xml then look 4 the following (depending on package naming): $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF/classes/package name/myApp/myApp.class (assuming ur servlet is named myApp.java). if this does not exits then definitely a source of problems. one small observation: ur statement: I have also tried to put the .war file... is disturbing because any good development system should work such that correct deployment is automatic. i'm not criticisizing jbuilder and borland. i like borland products. and, i'm not criticisizing u 4 ur choices. it just seems many people have problems w/ tc dev based more on deployment issues. if u have not progressed try the following: try to use the command line and deploy a test servlet (not myApp). and, invoke the servlet from the browser. ur applet should be outside ur webapps environment. if u can invoke ur test servlet then try to invoke it from ur applet. if u r comfortable working from the command line u might want to try the ant build system that is used to build the tc /examples applications. ant is a very powerfull tool and can really help w/ deployment issues. ide's r ok 4 debugging code issues but i have found most java developers have issues based more on: packaging, directories, files systems and deployment in general than code issues. hope this helps, david. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Servlet and Applet working in Tomcat 4.0.4 standalone
David Brown wrote: Patrick Kosiol writes: Hi, I am using the Tomcat 4.0.4 as a standalone-server. Esspecially because JBuilder7 supports Servlet debugging. OK. I have an webApplication that includes a client- and a server-directory (package). The server-dir contains the Servlet-Class and the client-dir contains the client, of course. This client is a java.applet and does work fine (it is startet through out a html-page). But my problem is to connect to the servlet. I have also tried to put the .war file into the %CATALINA_HOME%/webapps - folder and added the Lines !-- TOMCAT Bfpl-Context -- Context path=/myApp docBase=myApp debug=0 reloadable=true / into the server.xml. So the .war - File should be extracted at the next start of Tomcat. But that doesn't work What am I doing wrong? An other question is: How do I connect from an Applet or a java.frame (opened by the applet) to this servlet. What the adress of the servlet? So my Applet is working fine but I do not get a connection to the servlet, so I cannot get my data from the webserver. :-( I hope anyone can help me. thx Patrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Patrick, based on ur info i have to make some assumptions. from ur statment: I have also tried to put the .war file into the %CATALINA_HOME%/webapps - folder... and on: So the .war - File should be extracted at the next start of Tomcat. But that doesn't work... i am compelled to ask: does the .war expanded into something expected like: $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp? if not, this is the source of ur problem. if u do get expansion does this exist?: $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF/web.xml? if not, this is the source of ur problem. if u do have a web.xml then look 4 the following (depending on package naming): $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myApp/WEB-INF/classes/package name/myApp/myApp.class (assuming ur servlet is named myApp.java). if this does not exits then definitely a source of problems. one small observation: ur statement: I have also tried to put the .war file... is disturbing because any good development system should work such that correct deployment is automatic. i'm not criticisizing jbuilder and borland. i like borland products. and, i'm not criticisizing u 4 ur choices. it just seems many people have problems w/ tc dev based more on deployment issues. if u have not progressed try the following: try to use the command line and deploy a test servlet (not myApp). and, invoke the servlet from the browser. ur applet should be outside ur webapps environment. if u can invoke ur test servlet then try to invoke it from ur applet. if u r comfortable working from the command line u might want to try the ant build system that is used to build the tc /examples applications. ant is a very powerfull tool and can really help w/ deployment issues. ide's r ok 4 debugging code issues but i have found most java developers have issues based more on: packaging, directories, files systems and deployment in general than code issues. hope this helps, david. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, 1. I do not get any expansions. 2. My DirectorySystem is: WEB-INF classes myApp client server Can that works that the client and the server classes are in there folders? These Directory is created by JB so that should also work in Tomcat. Patrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Servlet and Applet working in Tomcat 4.0.4 standalone
On 29 Nov 2002 at 15:43, Patrick Kosiol wrote: deleted older messages... Hello, 1. I do not get any expansions. 2. My DirectorySystem is: WEB-INF classes myApp client server Can that works that the client and the server classes are in there folders? These Directory is created by JB so that should also work in Tomcat. Patrick A client cannot access files inside or below WEB-INF. Put all the files your applet needs above WEB-INF. If you need the same classes on server and client you must have them twice. For complex deployment see Ant as David suggested. You might also want to read the Application Developer's Guide: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0- doc/appdev/index.html or localPathToTomcat/webapps/tomcat-docs/appdev/index.html Andreas -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Thanks Jeff, Steve: Giving me a lot of ideas: Sadly I'm still running
full speed into mud ...
I have changed the image directory to reside under my WEB-INF folder, do
I need to configure this in one of the xml files as well? ie.
application web.xml, or server.xml or something?
I have written a filter that does authentication: It serves the
index.shtml file, but for some reason I have to specify it as
WEB-INF\index.shtml to make it work ...
snip ---
if (!validated) {
// Create the RequestDispatcher
Globals.utility.Log(className,
doFilter:,
Forwarding to + getHtmlResult, 5);
RequestDispatcher rd = config.getServletContext().
getRequestDispatcher( getHtmlResult );
rd.forward( req, res );
return ;
}
--- snip
where getHtmlResult is a string I read from a xml file. To make it work
I need to specify WEB-INF\index.shtml in my xml file.
This then serves the html, but none of my stylesheets or images are
displayed ...
snip ---
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=style.css
img src=images/logo.gif alt=Home width=142 height=60 border=0
hspace=0 vspace=0
--- snip
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 15:58, Steve Beech wrote:
Jeff's right. You're web app is in the folder /servlet so your images should
be in /servlet/images - of course I'm assuming you've got images on the
index.shtml page and these are the ones you can't see.
You only need the one web.xml file (in the WEB-INF folder for your web-app)
- a second under images is not required.
STeve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 November 2002 15:33
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Looks like you're basically putting your images in its own web app. You
may need a WEB-INF directory and trivial web.xml file under the images
directory in order for Tomcat to like it as a web app (not sure though).
Then, I think your url for the image would be /images/image.gif.
Alternatively, you could move your images directory to be within your
servlet web app. Then, your url (from index.shtml) would be
images/image.gif.
HTH,
-Jeff
p niemandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/18/02 09:35 AM
Please respond to Tomcat Users List
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and
Images
Hi Group: Please help ...
I'm very new to servlets, though I do have a lot of programming
experience. My problem is that I can't seem to get images displayed
properly using Tomcat as the web server.
I have a very simple layout ...
webapps
/servlet
index.shtml
/WEB-INF- My servlets and web.xml
/images
contains my images
I manage to serve the index.shtml quite easily, my problem is that I
can't get the images displayed without specifying the whole url in the
form file:///dir/to/images/image.gif, and I think this is wrong.
There is a lot of information regarding how to configure a web server to
display the images, and this I can do fine, but I would like to only run
Tomcat: My site is very small, and the latency in Tomcat would not
effect it. My question is in how to specify the url for the image in the
html,
I have tried image.gif, /servlet/image.gif, ../image/image.gif,
/servlet/../image/image.gif, etc, etc.
Now I suspect I'm missing something very stupid, but sadly I have no
idea what. I do not want to code the image display, as far as I know,
Tomcat should be able to handle such a simple html site.
My servlets work well, database connectivity and all, and the site works
well if I use apache as well, but how to do this without Apache is
currently beyond me.
Any information or just hints in the correct direction would be greatly
appreciated.
--
p niemandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Hi,
the problem with relative URL's when using the forward-method of a
request-dispatcher is that the URL's have to be relative to the server-root and
not to the destination page's actual location
e.g. under weapps you have a images-, a JSP and the WEB-INF-directory where your
servlet resides. Now when your servlet forwards to a JSP-page via a
request-dispatcher an the JSP-page contains an image you have to use the URL:
../images/image-used-in-the-page
Georg
p niemandt schrieb:
Thanks Jeff, Steve: Giving me a lot of ideas: Sadly I'm still running
full speed into mud ...
I have changed the image directory to reside under my WEB-INF folder, do
I need to configure this in one of the xml files as well? ie.
application web.xml, or server.xml or something?
I have written a filter that does authentication: It serves the
index.shtml file, but for some reason I have to specify it as
WEB-INF\index.shtml to make it work ...
snip ---
if (!validated) {
// Create the RequestDispatcher
Globals.utility.Log(className,
doFilter:,
Forwarding to + getHtmlResult, 5);
RequestDispatcher rd = config.getServletContext().
getRequestDispatcher( getHtmlResult );
rd.forward( req, res );
return ;
}
--- snip
where getHtmlResult is a string I read from a xml file. To make it work
I need to specify WEB-INF\index.shtml in my xml file.
This then serves the html, but none of my stylesheets or images are
displayed ...
snip ---
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=style.css
img src=images/logo.gif alt=Home width=142 height=60 border=0
hspace=0 vspace=0
--- snip
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 15:58, Steve Beech wrote:
Jeff's right. You're web app is in the folder /servlet so your images should
be in /servlet/images - of course I'm assuming you've got images on the
index.shtml page and these are the ones you can't see.
You only need the one web.xml file (in the WEB-INF folder for your web-app)
- a second under images is not required.
STeve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 November 2002 15:33
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Looks like you're basically putting your images in its own web app. You
may need a WEB-INF directory and trivial web.xml file under the images
directory in order for Tomcat to like it as a web app (not sure though).
Then, I think your url for the image would be /images/image.gif.
Alternatively, you could move your images directory to be within your
servlet web app. Then, your url (from index.shtml) would be
images/image.gif.
HTH,
-Jeff
p niemandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/18/02 09:35 AM
Please respond to Tomcat Users List
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and
Images
Hi Group: Please help ...
I'm very new to servlets, though I do have a lot of programming
experience. My problem is that I can't seem to get images displayed
properly using Tomcat as the web server.
I have a very simple layout ...
webapps
/servlet
index.shtml
/WEB-INF- My servlets and web.xml
/images
contains my images
I manage to serve the index.shtml quite easily, my problem is that I
can't get the images displayed without specifying the whole url in the
form file:///dir/to/images/image.gif, and I think this is wrong.
There is a lot of information regarding how to configure a web server to
display the images, and this I can do fine, but I would like to only run
Tomcat: My site is very small, and the latency in Tomcat would not
effect it. My question is in how to specify the url for the image in the
html,
I have tried image.gif, /servlet/image.gif, ../image/image.gif,
/servlet/../image/image.gif, etc, etc.
Now I suspect I'm missing something very stupid, but sadly I have no
idea what. I do not want to code the image display, as far as I know,
Tomcat should be able to handle such a simple html site.
My servlets work well, database connectivity and all, and the site works
well if I use apache as well, but how to do this without Apache is
currently beyond me.
Any information or just hints in the correct direction would be greatly
appreciated.
--
p niemandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Hi: This is getting closer, but somewhere I'm still doing something
extremely stupid, I think ...
Without the ../ in my url, if I check the logs, I get a 302, Moved kinda
thing, but with the ../ I get a 200 ok. The problem is that I still
can't see the image.
Can the problem be that the file served is called index.shtml, and is
not a jsp page?
I have tried to both include the request and to forward the request,
with the same results.
TIA,
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 13:12, Georg Hanwalter wrote:
Hi,
the problem with relative URL's when using the forward-method of a
request-dispatcher is that the URL's have to be relative to the server-root and
not to the destination page's actual location
e.g. under weapps you have a images-, a JSP and the WEB-INF-directory where your
servlet resides. Now when your servlet forwards to a JSP-page via a
request-dispatcher an the JSP-page contains an image you have to use the URL:
../images/image-used-in-the-page
Georg
p niemandt schrieb:
Thanks Jeff, Steve: Giving me a lot of ideas: Sadly I'm still running
full speed into mud ...
I have changed the image directory to reside under my WEB-INF folder, do
I need to configure this in one of the xml files as well? ie.
application web.xml, or server.xml or something?
I have written a filter that does authentication: It serves the
index.shtml file, but for some reason I have to specify it as
WEB-INF\index.shtml to make it work ...
snip ---
if (!validated) {
// Create the RequestDispatcher
Globals.utility.Log(className,
doFilter:,
Forwarding to + getHtmlResult, 5);
RequestDispatcher rd = config.getServletContext().
getRequestDispatcher( getHtmlResult );
rd.forward( req, res );
return ;
}
--- snip
where getHtmlResult is a string I read from a xml file. To make it work
I need to specify WEB-INF\index.shtml in my xml file.
This then serves the html, but none of my stylesheets or images are
displayed ...
snip ---
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=style.css
img src=images/logo.gif alt=Home width=142 height=60 border=0
hspace=0 vspace=0
--- snip
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 15:58, Steve Beech wrote:
Jeff's right. You're web app is in the folder /servlet so your images should
be in /servlet/images - of course I'm assuming you've got images on the
index.shtml page and these are the ones you can't see.
You only need the one web.xml file (in the WEB-INF folder for your web-app)
- a second under images is not required.
STeve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 November 2002 15:33
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Looks like you're basically putting your images in its own web app. You
may need a WEB-INF directory and trivial web.xml file under the images
directory in order for Tomcat to like it as a web app (not sure though).
Then, I think your url for the image would be /images/image.gif.
Alternatively, you could move your images directory to be within your
servlet web app. Then, your url (from index.shtml) would be
images/image.gif.
HTH,
-Jeff
p niemandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/18/02 09:35 AM
Please respond to Tomcat Users List
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and
Images
Hi Group: Please help ...
I'm very new to servlets, though I do have a lot of programming
experience. My problem is that I can't seem to get images displayed
properly using Tomcat as the web server.
I have a very simple layout ...
webapps
/servlet
index.shtml
/WEB-INF- My servlets and web.xml
/images
contains my images
I manage to serve the index.shtml quite easily, my problem is that I
can't get the images displayed without specifying the whole url in the
form file:///dir/to/images/image.gif, and I think this is wrong.
There is a lot of information regarding how to configure a web server to
display the images, and this I can do fine, but I would like to only run
Tomcat: My site is very small, and the latency in Tomcat would not
effect it. My question is in how to specify the url for the image in the
html,
I have tried image.gif, /servlet/image.gif, ../image/image.gif,
/servlet/../image/image.gif, etc, etc.
Now I suspect I'm missing something very stupid, but sadly I have no
idea what. I do not want to code the image display, as far as I know,
Tomcat should be able to handle such a simple html site.
My servlets work well
Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Do you use tomcat as standalone serving also all static files or do you use tomcat
together with a webserver like apache or iis. In this take care that your webserver
knows your webapp-directory for serving the static-files like your images
Georg
p niemandt schrieb:
Hi: This is getting closer, but somewhere I'm still doing something
extremely stupid, I think ...
Without the ../ in my url, if I check the logs, I get a 302, Moved kinda
thing, but with the ../ I get a 200 ok. The problem is that I still
can't see the image.
Can the problem be that the file served is called index.shtml, and is
not a jsp page?
I have tried to both include the request and to forward the request,
with the same results.
TIA,
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 13:12, Georg Hanwalter wrote:
Hi,
the problem with relative URL's when using the forward-method of a
request-dispatcher is that the URL's have to be relative to the server-root and
not to the destination page's actual location
e.g. under weapps you have a images-, a JSP and the WEB-INF-directory where your
servlet resides. Now when your servlet forwards to a JSP-page via a
request-dispatcher an the JSP-page contains an image you have to use the URL:
../images/image-used-in-the-page
Georg
p niemandt schrieb:
Thanks Jeff, Steve: Giving me a lot of ideas: Sadly I'm still running
full speed into mud ...
I have changed the image directory to reside under my WEB-INF folder, do
I need to configure this in one of the xml files as well? ie.
application web.xml, or server.xml or something?
I have written a filter that does authentication: It serves the
index.shtml file, but for some reason I have to specify it as
WEB-INF\index.shtml to make it work ...
snip ---
if (!validated) {
// Create the RequestDispatcher
Globals.utility.Log(className,
doFilter:,
Forwarding to + getHtmlResult, 5);
RequestDispatcher rd = config.getServletContext().
getRequestDispatcher( getHtmlResult );
rd.forward( req, res );
return ;
}
--- snip
where getHtmlResult is a string I read from a xml file. To make it work
I need to specify WEB-INF\index.shtml in my xml file.
This then serves the html, but none of my stylesheets or images are
displayed ...
snip ---
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=style.css
img src=images/logo.gif alt=Home width=142 height=60 border=0
hspace=0 vspace=0
--- snip
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 15:58, Steve Beech wrote:
Jeff's right. You're web app is in the folder /servlet so your images should
be in /servlet/images - of course I'm assuming you've got images on the
index.shtml page and these are the ones you can't see.
You only need the one web.xml file (in the WEB-INF folder for your web-app)
- a second under images is not required.
STeve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 November 2002 15:33
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Looks like you're basically putting your images in its own web app. You
may need a WEB-INF directory and trivial web.xml file under the images
directory in order for Tomcat to like it as a web app (not sure though).
Then, I think your url for the image would be /images/image.gif.
Alternatively, you could move your images directory to be within your
servlet web app. Then, your url (from index.shtml) would be
images/image.gif.
HTH,
-Jeff
p niemandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/18/02 09:35 AM
Please respond to Tomcat Users List
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and
Images
Hi Group: Please help ...
I'm very new to servlets, though I do have a lot of programming
experience. My problem is that I can't seem to get images displayed
properly using Tomcat as the web server.
I have a very simple layout ...
webapps
/servlet
index.shtml
/WEB-INF- My servlets and web.xml
/images
contains my images
I manage to serve the index.shtml quite easily, my problem is that I
can't get the images displayed without specifying the whole url in the
form file:///dir/to/images/image.gif, and I think this is wrong.
There is a lot of information regarding how to configure a web server to
display the images, and this I can do fine, but I would like to only run
Tomcat: My site is very small, and the latency in Tomcat would not
effect it. My question is in how
Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Yeah: I'm trying to use tomcat as a standalone web server: I managed to
do this fine using apache to host the images: but we don't want to run
both Apache and Tomcat for our web app. { The app is not complex enough
to warrant the extra overhead }
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 14:46, Georg Hanwalter wrote:
Do you use tomcat as standalone serving also all static files or do you use tomcat
together with a webserver like apache or iis. In this take care that your webserver
knows your webapp-directory for serving the static-files like your images
Georg
p niemandt schrieb:
Hi: This is getting closer, but somewhere I'm still doing something
extremely stupid, I think ...
Without the ../ in my url, if I check the logs, I get a 302, Moved kinda
thing, but with the ../ I get a 200 ok. The problem is that I still
can't see the image.
Can the problem be that the file served is called index.shtml, and is
not a jsp page?
I have tried to both include the request and to forward the request,
with the same results.
TIA,
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 13:12, Georg Hanwalter wrote:
Hi,
the problem with relative URL's when using the forward-method of a
request-dispatcher is that the URL's have to be relative to the server-root and
not to the destination page's actual location
e.g. under weapps you have a images-, a JSP and the WEB-INF-directory where your
servlet resides. Now when your servlet forwards to a JSP-page via a
request-dispatcher an the JSP-page contains an image you have to use the URL:
../images/image-used-in-the-page
Georg
p niemandt schrieb:
Thanks Jeff, Steve: Giving me a lot of ideas: Sadly I'm still running
full speed into mud ...
I have changed the image directory to reside under my WEB-INF folder, do
I need to configure this in one of the xml files as well? ie.
application web.xml, or server.xml or something?
I have written a filter that does authentication: It serves the
index.shtml file, but for some reason I have to specify it as
WEB-INF\index.shtml to make it work ...
snip ---
if (!validated) {
// Create the RequestDispatcher
Globals.utility.Log(className,
doFilter:,
Forwarding to + getHtmlResult, 5);
RequestDispatcher rd = config.getServletContext().
getRequestDispatcher( getHtmlResult );
rd.forward( req, res );
return ;
}
--- snip
where getHtmlResult is a string I read from a xml file. To make it work
I need to specify WEB-INF\index.shtml in my xml file.
This then serves the html, but none of my stylesheets or images are
displayed ...
snip ---
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=style.css
img src=images/logo.gif alt=Home width=142 height=60 border=0
hspace=0 vspace=0
--- snip
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 15:58, Steve Beech wrote:
Jeff's right. You're web app is in the folder /servlet so your images should
be in /servlet/images - of course I'm assuming you've got images on the
index.shtml page and these are the ones you can't see.
You only need the one web.xml file (in the WEB-INF folder for your web-app)
- a second under images is not required.
STeve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 November 2002 15:33
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Looks like you're basically putting your images in its own web app. You
may need a WEB-INF directory and trivial web.xml file under the images
directory in order for Tomcat to like it as a web app (not sure though).
Then, I think your url for the image would be /images/image.gif.
Alternatively, you could move your images directory to be within your
servlet web app. Then, your url (from index.shtml) would be
images/image.gif.
HTH,
-Jeff
p niemandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/18/02 09:35 AM
Please respond to Tomcat Users List
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and
Images
Hi Group: Please help ...
I'm very new to servlets, though I do have a lot of programming
experience. My problem is that I can't seem to get images displayed
properly using Tomcat as the web server.
I have a very simple layout ...
webapps
/servlet
index.shtml
/WEB-INF- My servlets and web.xml
/images
contains my images
I manage to serve the index.shtml quite easily, my
SOLVED: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Hi Group: Thanks for all the help ...
All I can say is stupidity kills ...
It turned out to be a simple configuration issue: Reinstalling Tomcat,
and reconfiguring it helped. It does not work if I use a ../ prefix,
but does if I just use images/xxx.gif
Regards.
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 15:05, p niemandt wrote:
Yeah: I'm trying to use tomcat as a standalone web server: I managed to
do this fine using apache to host the images: but we don't want to run
both Apache and Tomcat for our web app. { The app is not complex enough
to warrant the extra overhead }
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 14:46, Georg Hanwalter wrote:
Do you use tomcat as standalone serving also all static files or do you use tomcat
together with a webserver like apache or iis. In this take care that your webserver
knows your webapp-directory for serving the static-files like your images
Georg
p niemandt schrieb:
Hi: This is getting closer, but somewhere I'm still doing something
extremely stupid, I think ...
Without the ../ in my url, if I check the logs, I get a 302, Moved kinda
thing, but with the ../ I get a 200 ok. The problem is that I still
can't see the image.
Can the problem be that the file served is called index.shtml, and is
not a jsp page?
I have tried to both include the request and to forward the request,
with the same results.
TIA,
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 13:12, Georg Hanwalter wrote:
Hi,
the problem with relative URL's when using the forward-method of a
request-dispatcher is that the URL's have to be relative to the server-root and
not to the destination page's actual location
e.g. under weapps you have a images-, a JSP and the WEB-INF-directory where
your
servlet resides. Now when your servlet forwards to a JSP-page via a
request-dispatcher an the JSP-page contains an image you have to use the URL:
../images/image-used-in-the-page
Georg
p niemandt schrieb:
Thanks Jeff, Steve: Giving me a lot of ideas: Sadly I'm still running
full speed into mud ...
I have changed the image directory to reside under my WEB-INF folder, do
I need to configure this in one of the xml files as well? ie.
application web.xml, or server.xml or something?
I have written a filter that does authentication: It serves the
index.shtml file, but for some reason I have to specify it as
WEB-INF\index.shtml to make it work ...
snip ---
if (!validated) {
// Create the RequestDispatcher
Globals.utility.Log(className,
doFilter:,
Forwarding to + getHtmlResult, 5);
RequestDispatcher rd = config.getServletContext().
getRequestDispatcher( getHtmlResult );
rd.forward( req, res );
return ;
}
--- snip
where getHtmlResult is a string I read from a xml file. To make it work
I need to specify WEB-INF\index.shtml in my xml file.
This then serves the html, but none of my stylesheets or images are
displayed ...
snip ---
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=style.css
img src=images/logo.gif alt=Home width=142 height=60 border=0
hspace=0 vspace=0
--- snip
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 15:58, Steve Beech wrote:
Jeff's right. You're web app is in the folder /servlet so your images
should
be in /servlet/images - of course I'm assuming you've got images on the
index.shtml page and these are the ones you can't see.
You only need the one web.xml file (in the WEB-INF folder for your web-app)
- a second under images is not required.
STeve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 November 2002 15:33
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Looks like you're basically putting your images in its own web app. You
may need a WEB-INF directory and trivial web.xml file under the images
directory in order for Tomcat to like it as a web app (not sure though).
Then, I think your url for the image would be /images/image.gif.
Alternatively, you could move your images directory to be within your
servlet web app. Then, your url (from index.shtml) would be
images/image.gif.
HTH,
-Jeff
p niemandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/18/02 09:35 AM
Please respond to Tomcat Users List
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and
Images
Hi Group: Please help ...
I'm very new to servlets
Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Hi Group: Please help ... I'm very new to servlets, though I do have a lot of programming experience. My problem is that I can't seem to get images displayed properly using Tomcat as the web server. I have a very simple layout ... webapps /servlet index.shtml /WEB-INF- My servlets and web.xml /images contains my images I manage to serve the index.shtml quite easily, my problem is that I can't get the images displayed without specifying the whole url in the form file:///dir/to/images/image.gif, and I think this is wrong. There is a lot of information regarding how to configure a web server to display the images, and this I can do fine, but I would like to only run Tomcat: My site is very small, and the latency in Tomcat would not effect it. My question is in how to specify the url for the image in the html, I have tried image.gif, /servlet/image.gif, ../image/image.gif, /servlet/../image/image.gif, etc, etc. Now I suspect I'm missing something very stupid, but sadly I have no idea what. I do not want to code the image display, as far as I know, Tomcat should be able to handle such a simple html site. My servlets work well, database connectivity and all, and the site works well if I use apache as well, but how to do this without Apache is currently beyond me. Any information or just hints in the correct direction would be greatly appreciated. -- p niemandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Looks like you're basically putting your images in its own web app. You may need a WEB-INF directory and trivial web.xml file under the images directory in order for Tomcat to like it as a web app (not sure though). Then, I think your url for the image would be /images/image.gif. Alternatively, you could move your images directory to be within your servlet web app. Then, your url (from index.shtml) would be images/image.gif. HTH, -Jeff p niemandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/18/02 09:35 AM Please respond to Tomcat Users List To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images Hi Group: Please help ... I'm very new to servlets, though I do have a lot of programming experience. My problem is that I can't seem to get images displayed properly using Tomcat as the web server. I have a very simple layout ... webapps /servlet index.shtml /WEB-INF- My servlets and web.xml /images contains my images I manage to serve the index.shtml quite easily, my problem is that I can't get the images displayed without specifying the whole url in the form file:///dir/to/images/image.gif, and I think this is wrong. There is a lot of information regarding how to configure a web server to display the images, and this I can do fine, but I would like to only run Tomcat: My site is very small, and the latency in Tomcat would not effect it. My question is in how to specify the url for the image in the html, I have tried image.gif, /servlet/image.gif, ../image/image.gif, /servlet/../image/image.gif, etc, etc. Now I suspect I'm missing something very stupid, but sadly I have no idea what. I do not want to code the image display, as far as I know, Tomcat should be able to handle such a simple html site. My servlets work well, database connectivity and all, and the site works well if I use apache as well, but how to do this without Apache is currently beyond me. Any information or just hints in the correct direction would be greatly appreciated. -- p niemandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images
Jeff's right. You're web app is in the folder /servlet so your images should be in /servlet/images - of course I'm assuming you've got images on the index.shtml page and these are the ones you can't see. You only need the one web.xml file (in the WEB-INF folder for your web-app) - a second under images is not required. STeve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 November 2002 15:33 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images Looks like you're basically putting your images in its own web app. You may need a WEB-INF directory and trivial web.xml file under the images directory in order for Tomcat to like it as a web app (not sure though). Then, I think your url for the image would be /images/image.gif. Alternatively, you could move your images directory to be within your servlet web app. Then, your url (from index.shtml) would be images/image.gif. HTH, -Jeff p niemandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/18/02 09:35 AM Please respond to Tomcat Users List To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Tomcat 4 StandAlone Web Server, Static HTML and Images Hi Group: Please help ... I'm very new to servlets, though I do have a lot of programming experience. My problem is that I can't seem to get images displayed properly using Tomcat as the web server. I have a very simple layout ... webapps /servlet index.shtml /WEB-INF- My servlets and web.xml /images contains my images I manage to serve the index.shtml quite easily, my problem is that I can't get the images displayed without specifying the whole url in the form file:///dir/to/images/image.gif, and I think this is wrong. There is a lot of information regarding how to configure a web server to display the images, and this I can do fine, but I would like to only run Tomcat: My site is very small, and the latency in Tomcat would not effect it. My question is in how to specify the url for the image in the html, I have tried image.gif, /servlet/image.gif, ../image/image.gif, /servlet/../image/image.gif, etc, etc. Now I suspect I'm missing something very stupid, but sadly I have no idea what. I do not want to code the image display, as far as I know, Tomcat should be able to handle such a simple html site. My servlets work well, database connectivity and all, and the site works well if I use apache as well, but how to do this without Apache is currently beyond me. Any information or just hints in the correct direction would be greatly appreciated. -- p niemandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 4.0.1 StandAlone Web Server and SSL
Where/what is CVS? Thanks, John - Original Message - From: Peter Romianowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 6:14 AM Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.0.1 StandAlone Web Server and SSL Take a look into the the CVS. There is an updated version of the SSL-howto (under catalina/webapps/tomcat-doc) which describes how to use Verisign or Thawte CAs. -Original Message- From: Anton Brazhnyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 10:11 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.0.1 StandAlone Web Server and SSL Hi, -Original Message- From: John Echano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 2:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 4.0.1 StandAlone Web Server and SSL We are interested in implementing SSL four our Apache Jakarta Tomcat Server. We are running this as a standalone web server on Red Hat Linux 7.1. According to Tomcat's documentation, it currently operates on JKS format keystores (the Java's standard keystore format). Is this something supported by well-known public CAs like Verisign or Thawte? For example, Are we going to be able to generate a certificate request in a format that Thawte supports and that the return certificate can be imported into the Tomcat Server? If yes, how? The ssl-howto only provides instruction on how to use a self-sign certificate. IMHO, its possible, but you'll have to become very familiar (I wish I were) with SSL, PKI, JSSE and so on. Thanks, John Anton -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 4.0.1 StandAlone Web Server and SSL
Hi, -Original Message- From: John Echano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 2:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 4.0.1 StandAlone Web Server and SSL We are interested in implementing SSL four our Apache Jakarta Tomcat Server. We are running this as a standalone web server on Red Hat Linux 7.1. According to Tomcat's documentation, it currently operates on JKS format keystores (the Java's standard keystore format). Is this something supported by well-known public CAs like Verisign or Thawte? For example, Are we going to be able to generate a certificate request in a format that Thawte supports and that the return certificate can be imported into the Tomcat Server? If yes, how? The ssl-howto only provides instruction on how to use a self-sign certificate. IMHO, its possible, but you'll have to become very familiar (I wish I were) with SSL, PKI, JSSE and so on. Thanks, John Anton -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 4.0.1 StandAlone Web Server and SSL
Take a look into the the CVS. There is an updated version of the SSL-howto (under catalina/webapps/tomcat-doc) which describes how to use Verisign or Thawte CAs. -Original Message- From: Anton Brazhnyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 10:11 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.0.1 StandAlone Web Server and SSL Hi, -Original Message- From: John Echano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 2:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 4.0.1 StandAlone Web Server and SSL We are interested in implementing SSL four our Apache Jakarta Tomcat Server. We are running this as a standalone web server on Red Hat Linux 7.1. According to Tomcat's documentation, it currently operates on JKS format keystores (the Java's standard keystore format). Is this something supported by well-known public CAs like Verisign or Thawte? For example, Are we going to be able to generate a certificate request in a format that Thawte supports and that the return certificate can be imported into the Tomcat Server? If yes, how? The ssl-howto only provides instruction on how to use a self-sign certificate. IMHO, its possible, but you'll have to become very familiar (I wish I were) with SSL, PKI, JSSE and so on. Thanks, John Anton -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat 4.0.1 StandAlone Web Server and SSL
We are interested in implementing SSL four our Apache Jakarta Tomcat Server. We are running this as a standalone web server on Red Hat Linux 7.1. According to Tomcat's documentation, it currently operates on JKS format keystores (the Java's standard keystore format). Is this something supported by well-known public CAs like Verisign or Thawte? For example, Are we going to be able to generate a certificate request in a format that Thawte supports and that the return certificate can be imported into the Tomcat Server? If yes, how? The ssl-howto only provides instruction on how to use a self-sign certificate. Thanks, John -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to configure a URL redirect with Tomcat 4.0 standalone
Is there a way to configure Tomcat 4.0 in standalone mode to peform a URL redirect? E.g. www.myhost.com/FileA -- www.myhost.com/FileB. I would like to do this without deploying a servlet. Many thanks in advance. J. Haller -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SSL working on tomcat 4.0 standalone?
I just received a trial cert from Verisign. I tried to import the cert using the command keytool -import -alias tomcat -trustcacerts -file ./verisign.csr. After entering the password I received the following error keytool error: java.lang.Exception: Failed to establish chain from reply. Any ideas what is causing this error and how to get around it? Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: mik graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 6:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SSL working on tomcat 4.0 standalone? I have SSL running on tomcat 4.0 standalone, solaris 8 box. After following the directions from http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/ssl-howto.html it worked fine with my self signed certificate. I created the certificate by running the following command: keytool -genkey -alias tomcat -keyalg RSA I then proceeded to create the CSR which I sent to Verisign with the following: keytool -certreq -alias tomcat -file /tmp/foo.csr I found something odd here was that if I had spaces in my company name when I ran the keytool -genkey..., the keytool -certreq... would fail. I re-ran the keytool -genkey... and took out the spaces from the company name. Then the keytool -certreq... would work fine. Once I received back the certificate from Verisign, I tried to import it with the following. keytool -import -alias tomcat -trustcacerts -file ./verisign.csr The only odd thing was at the end it asked if I wanted to trust this certificate, I didn't think it was suppose to do that. I'm still able to connect to the server via https. Once connected I click on the lock to view the certificate and it still appears to be the original self signed one, not Verisign's. I'm looking for any help I can get on this one. Thanks. Mik Graham -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SSL working on tomcat 4.0 standalone?
I have SSL running on tomcat 4.0 standalone, solaris 8 box. After following the directions from http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/ssl-howto.html it worked fine with my self signed certificate. I created the certificate by running the following command: keytool -genkey -alias tomcat -keyalg RSA I then proceeded to create the CSR which I sent to Verisign with the following: keytool -certreq -alias tomcat -file /tmp/foo.csr I found something odd here was that if I had spaces in my company name when I ran the keytool -genkey..., the keytool -certreq... would fail. I re-ran the keytool -genkey... and took out the spaces from the company name. Then the keytool -certreq... would work fine. Once I received back the certificate from Verisign, I tried to import it with the following. keytool -import -alias tomcat -trustcacerts -file ./verisign.csr The only odd thing was at the end it asked if I wanted to trust this certificate, I didn't think it was suppose to do that. I'm still able to connect to the server via https. Once connected I click on the lock to view the certificate and it still appears to be the original self signed one, not Verisign's. I'm looking for any help I can get on this one. Thanks. Mik Graham -- To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat 4.0 standalone webserver.
Hi, I use the Tomcat 4.0 standalone webserver for an Intranet application. I currently don't need that much performance, and thus don't need the Apache webserver. I generate log files (with log4J) in my application context, making them available for the administrator, by using the browser. At the beginning it worked fine. I could see the log files grow, just by making a refresh of the page. But after a certain time (some hours) the file in the directory list of Tomcat just freezed (date, size), and Tomcat doesn't serve the latest file anymore. When I check the file over network, it's fine. I installed Tomcat in it's original configuration. No special settings. My context: Context path=/notes docBase=C:/Danny/DannyProj/Hitec/Hitec/Hkms/webapps/hkms debug=0 reloadable=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=localhost_notes_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ /Context Thanks for any info. Regards, Danny Heinen
tomcat 4 standalone virtual host
Is it possible to manage virtual hosts with tomcat 4 standalone ? When I start Tomcat, I get in catalina out : Starting service Tomcat-Standalone Apache tomcat/4.0 java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployApps(Unknown Source) ... If I start Tomcat without the virtual host, I get Starting service Tomcat-Standalone Apache tomcat/4.0 Starting service Tomcat-Apache Apache tomcat/4.0 Using Tomcat 3.2 and Apache 1.3.19, I had no trouble managing this virtual host And trying to compile mod_webapp, after ./configure I get : APR buildconf : autoconf not found (Linux MDK 7.2 with kernel 2.4.9) Dom
Re: Get Friggin Verisign Working on Tomcat 4.0 Standalone How To - The Official Thread
If you haven't already done this, you might want to check out the keytool documentation that comes with the JDK. The Examples section pretty much explains how to do it. The next thing you need to do is a -import when you get back the signed certificate from Verisign. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/tooldocs/win32/keytool.html Jon - Original Message - From: Nick Torenvliet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 9:33 AM Subject: Get Friggin Verisign Working on Tomcat 4.0 Standalone How To - The Official Thread Hi guys I''ve been searching through various sources like the list archives, responses(thanks) to my previous posts and I've got two things to offer. First the observation that a lot of us are struggling with getting third party services like verisign to work on tomcat standalone. Second I can give what I have so far which I believe is useful, I hope someone can move this subject to the next level for us. I'm running tomcat4.0 and jdk1.4(which includes the JSSE). At this point I have certificates and https running on my lan. The pretty little lock shows up on IE6 whenever one of my pcs requests tomcat to serve up some html. I got to this point by following the instructions at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/ssl-howto.html word for word. I found how to generate a CSR which was stumping a bunch of us, it was in a SAMS book on J2 I bought a while back from a bargain table(to think my wife thought it was useless), the command is keytool -certreq -keystore /root/.keystore -alias tomcat -file mycsr This command uses the keystore I created by following the the ssl how to in /root/.keystore, and the alias I used (again from the ssl how to)being tomcat and saves that highly coveted csr that you can send to verisign in the file mycsr. I almost cried when I saw the csr, it was just like on versign's website sob sob. Anyways I am going to send off my csr now, and anyone who would like to finish this get friggin verisign working howto please do so I can go home on time tonight. Love ya all Nick
Get Friggin Verisign Working on Tomcat 4.0 Standalone How To - The Official Thread
Hi guys I''ve been searching through various sources like the list archives, responses(thanks) to my previous posts and I've got two things to offer. First the observation that a lot of us are struggling with getting third party services like verisign to work on tomcat standalone. Second I can give what I have so far which I believe is useful, I hope someone can move this subject to the next level for us. I'm running tomcat4.0 and jdk1.4(which includes the JSSE). At this point I have certificates and https running on my lan. The pretty little lock shows up on IE6 whenever one of my pcs requests tomcat to serve up some html. I got to this point by following the instructions at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/ssl-howto.html word for word. I found how to generate a CSR which was stumping a bunch of us, it was in a SAMS book on J2 I bought a while back from a bargain table(to think my wife thought it was useless), the command is keytool -certreq -keystore /root/.keystore -alias tomcat -file mycsr This command uses the keystore I created by following the the ssl how to in /root/.keystore, and the alias I used (again from the ssl how to)being tomcat and saves that highly coveted csr that you can send to verisign in the file mycsr. I almost cried when I saw the csr, it was just like on versign's website sob sob. Anyways I am going to send off my csr now, and anyone who would like to finish this get friggin verisign working howto please do so I can go home on time tonight. Love ya all Nick
Tomcat 4 Standalone not running, NullPointerException..
I successfully built tomcat 4, and when I try to run it as a standalone server, I get this error in catalina.out. Any body faced this before, any solution. Thank you. Contents from catalina.out Starting service Tomcat-Standalone Apache Tomcat/4.0-rc1 java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.Hashtable.put(Hashtable.java:380) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.setResources(ContainerBase.java:747) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.setResources(StandardContext.java:1 090) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:3328) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1123) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1123) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(StandardEngine.java:307) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.start(StandardService.java:388) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start(StandardServer.java:505) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:776) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.execute(Catalina.java:681) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.process(Catalina.java:179) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:212)
Tomcat as standalone container
I am trying to use Tomcat as a standalone servlet container.To do this, do I need to have the Apache Web server installed and running, or is this contained in Tomcat? Thanks, Brian Casstevens
RE: Tomcat as standalone container
NO need of Apache -Original Message-From: Casstevens, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 6:17 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Tomcat as standalone container I am trying to use Tomcat as a standalone servlet container.To do this, do I need to have the Apache Web server installed and running, or is this contained in Tomcat? Thanks, Brian Casstevens
RE: Tomcat as standalone container
...hence the use of the word "standalone" ;) - r -Original Message-From: Rajeshwar Rao.V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: June 14, 2001 8:49 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: Tomcat as standalone container NO need of Apache -Original Message-From: Casstevens, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 6:17 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Tomcat as standalone container I am trying to use Tomcat as a standalone servlet container.To do this, do I need to have the Apache Web server installed and running, or is this contained in Tomcat? Thanks, Brian Casstevens
RE: Tomcat as standalone container
The Apache Web server is not contained in Tomcat. Tomcat is a Web server which includes a servlet engine and a JSP engine. To use Tomcat, there is no need to install a native Web server such as Apache or IIS or Netscape. Tomcat is able to serve static html pages as well. For production needs, Tomcat is also able to run ontop of such native servers (either as a in-process or out-of-process container) but this is not necessary. This is a choice which depends of your context. For more information, download the last version and have a look to the user's guide. Christian BERNARD Nagora Technologies -Original Message-From: Casstevens, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 2:47 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Tomcat as standalone container I am trying to use Tomcat as a standalone servlet container.To do this, do I need to have the Apache Web server installed and running, or is this contained in Tomcat? Thanks, Brian Casstevens
Re: Tomcat 3.2 standalone on Solaris 2.7 core dumping
HI Tom: try increasing the memory available to shell in which your tomcat server is running(on popup window in case ur using defaults) It might work Hemant - Original Message - From: Tom Amiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 10:31 PM Subject: Tomcat 3.2 standalone on Solaris 2.7 core dumping Hi, I'm using Tomcat 3.2 in standalone mode on Solaris 2.7 with the JDK 1.3, and it is core dumping with Java Out of Memory. Tomcat is running a servlet that performs XSLT transformations on an XML file that is ~1.4MB big and returns html output to the client browser. It was running fine during development, but once the servlet was made available to the web site's users (www.coolrunning.com), it began crashing. Must be due to the increased load. I don't know how heavy the load is exactly, nor how to determine it, but the site is not an Ebay by any means. I'm assuming Tomcat can handle a single servlet application on a low-traffic web site -- less than 100,000 hits a day. Following suggestions on the web, I've - Increased the memory allocated to Tomcat to 128M (using -Xmx128m switch) - Increased the max_threads to 100 - Increased the file descriptors to 256 - added System.gc(); to the end of the Servlet code These changes have helped; it takes much longer, but it still crashes under normal use. I've been watching the output from the top command. It shows that the Tomcat Java process is starting with about 32MB and over time and load it climbs. It was running at 62M for quite a while, and it even dropped to 55M, and then grew to 169M without crashing. Not sure how high the SIZE (memory) gets to before it crashes; but crash it does with a core dump. With the 'ps' command, I don't see any accumulation of treads. Here's a dump 81= /usr/ucb/ps -auxww | grep thread root 24231 73.0 28.3173016141648 ?R 20:30:02 21:51 /usr/local/j2sdk/ bin/../bin/sparc/native_threads/java -Xmx128m -Dtomcat.home=/usr/local/tomca t or g.apache.tomcat.startup.Tomcat I don't know how to analyze the core dump, except to use strings on it. At least, I can see that it was definitely caused by Tomcat. What would be a reasonable setting on max_threads? Is 100 just to low? I could start Tomcat with more memory, say 256M (system has 512MB), but I don't want to negatively impact the other applications. The system is running Apache without any problems, independent of Tomcat. I've spent months developing this JSP/Servlet application for the Coolrunning Events calendar, and can't go back. Have to make Tomcat work! Any help appreciated. Tom
Tomcat 3.2 standalone on Solaris 2.7 core dumping
Hi, I'm using Tomcat 3.2 in standalone mode on Solaris 2.7 with the JDK 1.3, and it is core dumping with Java Out of Memory. Tomcat is running a servlet that performs XSLT transformations on an XML file that is ~1.4MB big and returns html output to the client browser. It was running fine during development, but once the servlet was made available to the web site's users (www.coolrunning.com), it began crashing. Must be due to the increased load. I don't know how heavy the load is exactly, nor how to determine it, but the site is not an Ebay by any means. I'm assuming Tomcat can handle a single servlet application on a low-traffic web site -- less than 100,000 hits a day. Following suggestions on the web, I've - Increased the memory allocated to Tomcat to 128M (using -Xmx128m switch) - Increased the max_threads to 100 - Increased the file descriptors to 256 - added System.gc(); to the end of the Servlet code These changes have helped; it takes much longer, but it still crashes under normal use. I've been watching the output from the top command. It shows that the Tomcat Java process is starting with about 32MB and over time and load it climbs. It was running at 62M for quite a while, and it even dropped to 55M, and then grew to 169M without crashing. Not sure how high the SIZE (memory) gets to before it crashes; but crash it does with a core dump. With the 'ps' command, I don't see any accumulation of treads. Here's a dump 81= /usr/ucb/ps -auxww | grep thread root 24231 73.0 28.3173016141648 ?R 20:30:02 21:51 /usr/local/j2sdk/ bin/../bin/sparc/native_threads/java -Xmx128m -Dtomcat.home=/usr/local/tomcat or g.apache.tomcat.startup.Tomcat I don't know how to analyze the core dump, except to use strings on it. At least, I can see that it was definitely caused by Tomcat. What would be a reasonable setting on max_threads? Is 100 just to low? I could start Tomcat with more memory, say 256M (system has 512MB), but I don't want to negatively impact the other applications. The system is running Apache without any problems, independent of Tomcat. I've spent months developing this JSP/Servlet application for the Coolrunning Events calendar, and can't go back. Have to make Tomcat work! Any help appreciated. Tom
Tomcat as standalone HTTP server
Hi, Is there somebody using Jakarta Tomcat as standalone HTTP server? Witch (is/are) the most important difference(s) between this configuration and Apache + Tomcat? Bye.
Re: Tomcat as standalone HTTP server
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Olivier LAUDREN wrote: | Hi, | | Is there somebody using Jakarta Tomcat as standalone HTTP server? | Witch (is/are) the most important difference(s) between this | configuration and Apache + Tomcat? Speed on static documents. Apache is written in some C, while Tomcat is written in the considerably slower Java. Also you can load-balance via the apache, having one front-end apache server, and 49 backend Tomcats. The apache can then do sticky session load balancing between those tomcats. It's a more messy config using both, but it works! -- Mvh, Endre
Classpath problems with tomcat 3.2.1 standalone.
I've at my wits end trying to resolve ClassNotFoundExceptions using tomcat 3.2.1 and jdk 1.2.2. I'm using JMS and JNDI that relies on a jar file and a zip file, fmprtl.zip and j2ee.jar. I need j2ee.jar for the javax.naming classes which aren't included in jdk1.2.2. I explicitly added the .zip file to my Tomcat classpath. My webapps directory structure looks like: D:\Apps\tomcat\webapps\JMSadmin -error.jsp - JMSQueue.jsp D:\Apps\tomcat\webapps\JMSadmin\WEB-INF -classes\ - lib\ D:\Apps\tomcat\webapps\JMSadmin\WEB-INF\classes - NumMessagesBean.class - QueueBean.class - queueList.properties - QueueListBean.class D:\Apps\tomcat\webapps\JMSadmin\WEB-INF\lib - j2ee.jar When I try to access my JMSQueue.jsp page which uses the beans in the WEB-INF\classes directory, my jasper log shows 2001-04-10 09:34:22 - ServletPath: /JMSQueue.jsp2001-04-10 09:34:22 - PathInfo: null2001-04-10 09:34:22 - RealPath: D:\Apps\tomcat\webapps\JMSadmin\JMSQueue.jsp2001-04-10 09:34:22 - RequestURI: /JMSadmin/JMSQueue.jsp2001-04-10 09:34:22 - QueryString: server=devmosjms1port=20012001-04-10 09:34:22 - Request Params:2001-04-10 09:34:22 - port = 20012001-04-10 09:34:22 - server = devmosjms1 2001-04-10 09:34:22 - Classpath according to the Servlet Engine is: D:\Apps\tomcat\webapps\JMSadmin\WEB-INF\classes;D:\Apps\tomcat\webapps\JMSadmin\WEB-INF\lib\j2ee.jar This makes it look like j2ee.jar is on my classpath, but the jsp throws an exception: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/naming/spi/InitialContextFactory, and this class is in j2ee.jar. If I put j2ee.jar explicitly on my Tomcat classpath (making sure its after servlet.jar, which it conflicts with), the code works. I've added a Context to my servlet.xml file: Context path="/JMSadmin" docBase="webapps/JMSadmin" debug="0" crossContext="false" reloadable="false" /ContextAny ideas why j2ee.jar isn't found by the .jsp page? Renée PetrisOverseer of the ExecutionLoudeye Technologies[EMAIL PROTECTED]414 Olive Way, Suite 300Seattle, WA 98101206-832-4500 phone206-832-4475 fax
