[twsocket] Should next ICS version support anything before Delphi XE ?
I'm slowly converting to RAD Studio 2010 [C++ Personality], but have XE and will likely get whatever comes after XE2, assuming they build 64-bit C++ into it. Once I convert my existing app from CBuilder 6, I'm good with anything from 2010 on. In the meantime, certainly I can continue to use the current version of ICS with Cbuilder 6. Thanks, I. -Original Message- From: twsocket-boun...@elists.org [mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org] On Behalf Of twsocket-requ...@elists.org Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 3:44 AM To: twsocket@elists.org Subject: TWSocket Digest, Vol 469, Issue 5 Send TWSocket mailing list submissions to twsocket@elists.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to twsocket-requ...@elists.org You can reach the person managing the list at twsocket-ow...@elists.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of TWSocket digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: Should next ICS version support anything before DelphiXE ? (Jeff Hamblin) 2. Re: Should next ICS version support anything beforeDelphiXE ? (Lars Gehre) 3. Re: Should next ICS version support anything before Delphi XE ? (Jeff Cook) 4. Re: Should next ICS version support anything before Delphi XE ? (RTT) 5. Re: Should next ICS version support anything before DelphiXE ? (Darin McGee) 6. Re: Should next ICS version support anything before Delphi XE ? (Dod) 7. Re: Should next ICS version support anything before Delphi XE ? (Primoz Gabrijelcic) 8. Re: Should next ICS version support anything before DelphiXE ? (Kochendoerfer, Michael) 9. Re: Should next ICS version support anything before Delphi XE ? (Stefan Paege) -- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:27:05 -0700 From: Jeff Hamblin jphamb...@qtools.com Subject: Re: [twsocket] Should next ICS version support anything before DelphiXE ? To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Message-ID: 4f739039.8030...@qtools.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed I am still using D2007, and very happy with the current version of ICS. I don't have any problem with a new version of ICS starting fresh at XE or whatever you choose. -Jeff -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:58:11 +0200 From: Lars Gehre l...@dvbviewer.com Subject: Re: [twsocket] Should next ICS version support anything beforeDelphiXE ? To: 'ICS support mailing' twsocket@elists.org Message-ID: 5B7EFA005BBC41A9AE197A880F8BAC74@PowerPC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Well I for my part would like see the IP V6 branch of Arno Garrels as the next ICS V8 (with support of older Delphi versions, XE2 firemonkey and x64 bit) because it is a REAL step forward for ICS and useful without new language mumbo jumbo. ;) I'm not saying there might be a time to make a cut and say that's it for now only the current and following Versions of delphi. But come on, IP V6 IS coming and it is big and it will be needed also in legacy applications developed with older Delphi versions. Regards Lars -Original Message- From: twsocket-boun...@elists.org [mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org] On Behalf Of Arno Garrels Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 11:00 PM To: ICS support mailing Subject: Re: [twsocket] Should next ICS version support anything beforeDelphiXE ? Fran?ois Piette wrote: I'm planning the next ICS version. Interesting, I'm planning it since last year as well, namely in the IPv6/FireMonkey beta branch and while porting ICS to XE2 64-bit. What are your actual plans except abandon support for older compilers? Being unable to use any features added to Delphi in the last 10 years is very restricted. Maybe we need to cease support for old Delphi versions ? Abandon Delphi 7 support was just stupid unless someone rewrites ICS to take full advantage of the new and powerful language features at the same time, sorry ( I won't be the guy doing this ). Actually the tweaks required to get current ICS compiled from D7 up to latest RAD Studio version are **very minor** (oh, this property StrictDelimiter doesn't exist in D7? **come on**). BTW: Indy still supports D5! Taking into account that many of the new language features can't be used without problems before XE/2010 (because of bugs), it makes *no sense* at all to abandon D7 if at the same time support for D2007 is kept. It would make sense though to start a _new version from *scratch*, such an incarnation of ICS ;) would then of course support only XE+ or maybe D2010+, is that your plan? -- Arno -- francois.pie...@overbyte.be The author of
Re: [twsocket] Having a problem with Rad Studio 2010.
I have installed only v7, and still have this problem. Ideas? Thanks, Ian Ian Tuck CEO NoGlobalBorders Inc. - Going. Your way. http://www.noglobalborders.com w: (416) 360-4642 x205 c: (416) 574-6642 The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] Having a problem with Rad Studio 2010.
Ø What happens when you build one of the demo projects? HttpTst builds fine. I definitely don't have any other installation of ics on my machine. I guess I can uninstall the VCL and reinstall it to see if that works. I'm using the C++ personality. Which should not be loading, winsock.h or ws2def.h? Thanks, Ian Ian Tuck CEO NoGlobalBorders Inc. - Going. Your way. http://www.noglobalborders.com w: (416) 360-4642 x205 c: (416) 574-6642 The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] Having a problem with Rad Studio 2010.
Perhaps I should mention that I’m using the FTPServer component. Ian Tuck CEO NoGlobalBorders Inc. - Going. Your way. http://www.noglobalborders.com w: (416) 360-4642 x205 c: (416) 574-6642 The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] Having a problem with Rad Studio 2010.
Apparently there was a conflict with another 3rd party library that was loading winsock2, perhaps? At any rate, changing the order of the include files in my source fixed the problem. Not fantastic news, but at least it now compiles. Thanks for your help. The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
[twsocket] Having a problem with Rad Studio 2010.
I’ve finally made the switch from C++ Builder 6 to Rad Studio 2010, and am going through migration heck. I’m trying to recompile one of my apps, and for some reason it is loading both winsock.h and ws2defh. I’m running Windows 7 on a 64-bit machine, if that matters. Here’s the error I get: [BCC32 Error] ws2def.h(213): E2238 Multiple declaration for 'sockaddr' [BCC32 Error] winsock.h(486): E2344 Earlier declaration of 'sockaddr' [BCC32 Error] ws2def.h(222): E2146 Need an identifier to declare [BCC32 Error] ws2def.h(391): E2184 Enum syntax error [BCC32 Error] ws2def.h(444): E2040 Declaration terminated incorrectly (and many more). Does anyone have any ideas as to why it’s loading both winsock 2 and winsock.h? Thanks for any help you can give. I’m pulling my hair out here. Cheers, Ian The information contained in this e-mail message, and any attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed without our express permission. If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message, or any attachment thereto, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the message and all of its attachments. Thank you. Every effort is made to keep our network free from viruses. You should, however, review this e-mail message, as well as any attachment thereto, for viruses. We take no responsibility and have no liability for any computer virus which may be transferred via this e-mail message. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] [OT] Borland Turbo
I'm really sad for Borland another chance stupidly wasted... Who was the genius that creates the non-extensibility idioturbo model I totally disagree. This is an awesome *FREE* deal for people who want to start to develop their own apps, or create quick-and-dirty tools. The component set that is included with the free version is pretty comprehensive. It will let hobbyists get started with the languages and the UI, and then they can upgrade to the Pro version (which I believe will only cost around $300.00) to be able to add 3rd party components. For those of us that remember programming in Turbo Pascal 20 years ago, this is a return to their roots, and anyone who thinks they are stupid for offering a free development environment that is slick and produces pretty fast code probably isn't their target market. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
[twsocket] Problems installing ICS on C++ Builder 2006 (Update 1)
This is slightly off-topic, but you're the first person I know who has tried C++ 2006, Kris. Have you found that all (any?) other component libraries work out of the box? What are your first impressions? Ian -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
[twsocket] C++ Builder - bcbie60 problem
Hi. I've seen this question asked before, but didn't see a solution posted in the archives. I've just compiled the latest beta of ICS, and when I attempt to install the packages, I get a warning that BCB can not install the package because bcbie60 already contains the unit shdocvw_ocx. Has anyone seen this before? Any ideas at resolving it? Thanks, Ian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:00 AM To: twsocket@elists.org Subject: TWSocket Digest, Vol 140, Issue 4 Send TWSocket mailing list submissions to twsocket@elists.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of TWSocket digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: Bug in SmtpProt.pas (DZ-Jay) 2. Re: Bug in SmtpProt.pas (Bj?rnar Nielsen) 3. Re: Speed and buffered file stream (Arno Garrels) 4. Re: Bug in SmtpProt.pas (Arno Garrels) -- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 06:35:02 -0400 From: DZ-Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [twsocket] Bug in SmtpProt.pas To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Oct 26, 2005, at 06:06, Arno Garrels wrote: So the subject arrives as one continuous line of 1000+ characters? And the SMPT server permits this? Strange. I'll take your word for it, as I have no access to Outlook 2003 to test. Some mail servers reformat invalid headers and mime messages, with sometimes very strange results. Also some MTA's would drop the connection on receiving very long lines since they assume a buffer overrun attack. That's what I was alluding at; I was assuming he meant that the message would arrive intact with the entire subject line without breaks or truncation. One note on OE 6, it truncates the subject line at 266 chars silently. Outlook 2000 does the same thing, and it won't let you enter a subject line longer than 256 characters (but it split it with CRLF+TAB after every 74 chars.) dZ. -- DZ-Jay [TeamICS] -- Message: 2 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:52:03 +0200 From: Bj?rnar Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [twsocket] Bug in SmtpProt.pas To: 'ICS support mailing' twsocket@elists.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 That's what I was alluding at; I was assuming he meant that the message would arrive intact with the entire subject line without breaks or truncation. It does, but I can't write more than 256 chars in the subject-line. The subject is kept as a single line, no splits. The subject is sent this way and I receive it back from the mailserver the same way. Regards Bj?rnar -- Message: 3 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:03:07 +0200 From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [twsocket] Speed and buffered file stream To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote: I've uploaded a tiny buffered file stream class as well as a simple test program. It is amazing fast when small chunks are read/written. Seeking is slower than TFileStream :( I'll try in one of my applications, but it won't be until next week. For the FTP server, I often have multiple PCs downloading the same files, in some cases 30 or 40 megs. With the normal TFileStream, presumably Windows will be effectively buffering the file once, and each separate stream will be reading from common windows buffers, in the normal read chunks specified by the server. I've never really understood whether this was efficient, or just simple. So what are the implications of buffering the same file multiple times? Presumably just the extra memory for the buffer? You save a lot of API calls. It depends on the ratio of block size and buffer size. The SmtpCli reads files byte by byte hence it benefits from a buffered stream enormously. I have a couple of special files that are read thousands of times of day, both less than 1 meg that I could keep in a memory stream for efficiency. I think that's the fasted way of caching. Angus -- Message: 4 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:26:12 +0200 From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [twsocket] Bug in SmtpProt.pas To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Bj?rnar Nielsen wrote: That's what I was alluding at; I was assuming he meant
