[U2] Windows firewall and UVODBC

2004-12-07 Thread Andy Moore
DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify
the sender immediately.  Please note that there is no guarantee that
this email or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted
or amended.

Hello,

We have Universe running on Windows with the Windows firewall installed,
but the firewall is stopping access to the UVODBC.

Normally I can configure firewalls to let the UVODBC through, but the
Windows one is not one that I am familiar with.

Has anyone got any experience with this and if so do you have the
settings required or any advice?

Thanks

Andy Moore
Selima Software Ltd
Tel: 0114 2815000
Fax: 0114 281
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Windows firewall and UVODBC

2004-12-07 Thread Adrian Matthews
IF you go to Control Panel, select Windows firewall, then choose the
Exceptions tab then you will be able to allow the program or unblock the
port.

Bit trickier if your settings are controlled from the domain though

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Moore
Sent: 07 December 2004 12:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] Windows firewall and UVODBC

DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify
the sender immediately.  Please note that there is no guarantee that
this email or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted
or amended.

Hello,

We have Universe running on Windows with the Windows firewall installed,
but the firewall is stopping access to the UVODBC.

Normally I can configure firewalls to let the UVODBC through, but the
Windows one is not one that I am familiar with.

Has anyone got any experience with this and if so do you have the
settings required or any advice?

Thanks

Andy Moore
Selima Software Ltd
Tel: 0114 2815000
Fax: 0114 281
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the 
use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this 
email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any 
copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official 
business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by 
it.  IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the 
Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities 
and Investments Commission.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] [ot] hpux11/uv10 validate user login

2004-12-07 Thread gerry-u2ug
Thanks for the replies.

Let me ask a related question - maybe the question I should have asked in 1st 
place ;)

My universe su solution works just peachy for terminal sessions.  The new 
request was raised with regards to the clients web interface.  Of course the 
common logon scenario doesn't apply here as the web is directed mainly at 
customer support ( availability type stuff ).  However, the web login is driven 
by a table in universe that contains userids  passwords - not the most secure 
environment and also completely unrelated to the users unix login/password.  
When the secondary login was implemented, it was suggested that the web login 
be tied into this rather than using the table based authentication.  

Ok - so now to the actual question :

Their web interface is driven built on redback  I have zero experience with or 
knowledge of it.  I would have thought os(unix) level user authentication would 
have been handled within redback as part of its basic design/functionality.  
True or not true ?

Gerry
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Windows firewall and UVODBC

2004-12-07 Thread Andy Moore
DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify
the sender immediately.  Please note that there is no guarantee that
this email or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted
or amended.

The firewall is on the server, not the client machine.

The UVODBC on the server is part of Universe, so I can't just tell it to
allow the application access as far as I am aware, or do I tell it to
allow UV.EXE or something?

Also, there haven't been any pop up windows asking for access. This is
not like other firewalls that I am normally fine with.

Thanks 


Andy Moore
Selima Software Ltd.

-Original Message-
From: Donald Kibbey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 07 December 2004 14:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] Windows firewall and UVODBC

Add UVODBC to the exceptions.  You can do this one of two ways, one is
to make an UVODBC connection from the windows machine with the firewall
and wait for the firewall warning to come up.  The warning screen gives
you the option of allowing that program to contine and adding it to the
exceptions list.  The other way is to go into the control panel, find
the firewall applet and add UVODBC to the exceptions there.  


Don Kibbey
Financial Systems Manager
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett  Dunner LLP


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/07/04 07:33AM 
DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify
the sender immediately.  Please note that there is no guarantee that
this email or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted
or amended.

Hello,

We have Universe running on Windows with the Windows firewall installed,
but the firewall is stopping access to the UVODBC.

Normally I can configure firewalls to let the UVODBC through, but the
Windows one is not one that I am familiar with.

Has anyone got any experience with this and if so do you have the
settings required or any advice?

Thanks

Andy Moore
Selima Software Ltd
Tel: 0114 2815000
Fax: 0114 281
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Universe ON.EXIT

2004-12-07 Thread Anthony Dzikiewicz
I guess it would be nice to have that as an option like it seems to be in
Unidata as someone else pointed out.  Options are nice.
Anthony

 -Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Behalf Of Glenn Herbert
Sent:   Tuesday, December 07, 2004 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [U2] Universe ON.EXIT

FWIW, back at rev 8.3.3 when this issue was first raised, it was decided
that we could not change this behavior as it might affect existing
applications already out in the field that did NOT expect the ON.EXIT to
automatically run at close of a phantom.  The resolution on this was that
the user can simply add QUIT as the last command in their phantom, which
would force the ON.EXIT to run.

When this issue was again raised at 9.3.1.1, it was given as an
'enhancement', which at that time, meant you wouldn't ever see it.  If we
had even looked at it, we would have probably come to the same conclusion
as earlier; we could NOT change behavior if it would have impacted existing
applications.

I know its not an answer, but it is some history on this event.  I lived
it! :-)

Glenn

At 12:07 AM 12/7/2004, you wrote:
From: Womack, Adrian
 
  Phantoms under PI/Open would execute the ON.EXIT paragraph when
exiting.

what does UD do?

  It's pretty annoying that UniVerse doesn't do the same thing (IMO it
should).

Agreed.
Knowledgebase G21418 mentioned by Clif Oliver has been open since
9/4/97, UV 9.3.
For more exposure, add this request to .www.U2UG.org  Forums 
Enhancements  New requests.
I hope over time that will become an effective way to present requests
to IBM with a united voice.

cds
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Universe ON.EXIT

2004-12-07 Thread Anthony Dzikiewicz
You're right.  Just like it says in the book.  I put a QUIT  at the end of
my job and the ON.EXIT executed.  One other interesting thing I noticed in
doing this exercise is that the @TTY variable for phantoms does not register
as 'phantom' when logging out as it does when logging in.  Not important for
me, but interesting.

Thanks
Anthony

 -Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Behalf Of Uffe Toft
Sent:   Tuesday, December 07, 2004 5:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[U2] Universe ON.EXIT

Universe phantoms will execute the ON.EXIT paragraph, if the phantom
processes a paragraph ending with a QUIT.


Regards,
Uffe Toft
Steria Denmark
(

 -Original Message-

Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:05:07 -0500
From: Anthony Dzikiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] Universe ON.EXIT

Im messing with the ON.EXIT record in the VOC.  It doesn't seem to work
with
phantoms.  I guess I assumed that it did.  The documentation says that the
ON.EXIT is performed when you 'QUIT'.  I guess that doesn't happen with
phantoms.  Is this correct ?  Can anyone confirm this ?
Anthony
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] [ot] hpux11/uv10 validate user login

2004-12-07 Thread gerry-u2ug
Hi Mike , 

yes i see that much on the client system.
I am surprised though that there is still no way to validate a user even though 
the connection is physically through a common login.  I would have thought that 
this would be basic functionality as it must be a very very very common 
requirement.

thanks
Gerry




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Randall
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 09:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [ot] hpux11/uv10 validate user login


Not true.  Redback database requests are handled by dedicated universe
processes (responders).  These responders are logged in under the Redback
user ID setup by the administrator.   Requests for data or processing come
in anonymously via the web to the responders.   Any additional
authentication/security must added by the developer at the application
level.

Mike Randall

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gerry-u2ug
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 8:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [ot] hpux11/uv10 validate user login


Ok - so now to the actual question :

Their web interface is driven built on redback  I have zero experience with
or knowledge of it.  I would have thought os(unix) level user authentication
would have been handled within redback as part of its basic
design/functionality.  True or not true ?


Gerry
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Universe ON.EXIT

2004-12-07 Thread Clifton Oliver
It could have been made a uvconfig option, and would be nice if IBM 
would do that.

BTW, does anyone have a manual and page number reference for the QUIT 
technique for phantoms and ON.EXIT? I can't find where this is documented.

--
Regards,
Clif
~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER  ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678Web: www.oliver.com
~~~

Glenn Herbert wrote:
conclusion as earlier; we could NOT change behavior if it would have 
impacted existing applications.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] [ot] hpux11/uv10 validate user login

2004-12-07 Thread gerry-u2ug
Hi Mike , 

yes i see that much on the client system.
I am surprised though that there is still no way to validate a user even though 
the connection is physically through a common login.  I would have thought that 
this would be basic functionality as it must be a very very very common 
requirement.

thanks
Gerry




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Randall
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 09:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [ot] hpux11/uv10 validate user login


Not true.  Redback database requests are handled by dedicated universe
processes (responders).  These responders are logged in under the Redback
user ID setup by the administrator.   Requests for data or processing come
in anonymously via the web to the responders.   Any additional
authentication/security must added by the developer at the application
level.

Mike Randall

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gerry-u2ug
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 8:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] [ot] hpux11/uv10 validate user login


Ok - so now to the actual question :

Their web interface is driven built on redback  I have zero experience with
or knowledge of it.  I would have thought os(unix) level user authentication
would have been handled within redback as part of its basic
design/functionality.  True or not true ?


Gerry
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Universe ON.EXIT

2004-12-07 Thread Jerry Banker
I agree with Glenn. I don't think you want to open up a can of worms like 
this. If there is a working resolution, especially as simple as putting QUIT 
in the phantom paragraph, then I wouldn't change it.

- Original Message - 
From: Glenn Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 8:11 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe ON.EXIT


FWIW, back at rev 8.3.3 when this issue was first raised, it was decided
that we could not change this behavior as it might affect existing
applications already out in the field that did NOT expect the ON.EXIT to
automatically run at close of a phantom.  The resolution on this was that
the user can simply add QUIT as the last command in their phantom, which
would force the ON.EXIT to run.

When this issue was again raised at 9.3.1.1, it was given as an
'enhancement', which at that time, meant you wouldn't ever see it.  If we
had even looked at it, we would have probably come to the same conclusion
as earlier; we could NOT change behavior if it would have impacted existing
applications.

I know its not an answer, but it is some history on this event.  I lived
it! :-)

Glenn

At 12:07 AM 12/7/2004, you wrote:
From: Womack, Adrian
 
  Phantoms under PI/Open would execute the ON.EXIT paragraph when
exiting.

what does UD do?

  It's pretty annoying that UniVerse doesn't do the same thing (IMO it
should).

Agreed.
Knowledgebase G21418 mentioned by Clif Oliver has been open since
9/4/97, UV 9.3.
For more exposure, add this request to .www.U2UG.org  Forums 
Enhancements  New requests.
I hope over time that will become an effective way to present requests
to IBM with a united voice.

cds
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Universe ON.EXIT

2004-12-07 Thread Stevenson, Charles
New uvconfig parameters can control optional behaviour if a proposed
enhancement would affect backward compatibility.  That leaves it to user
to decide which compatibility he wants, PI or older UV.

Thanks, Uffe, for the QUIT paragraph tip.  Makes sense.  That
workaround/resolution is not mentioned in Knowledgebase.  It is just
left as an open ticket.   Sound like a job for Mr. Dreyfuss.

Thanks for the historical perspective, Glenn.

cds


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Herbert
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 6:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe ON.EXIT

FWIW, back at rev 8.3.3 when this issue was first raised, it was decided
that we could not change this behavior as it might affect existing
applications already out in the field that did NOT expect the ON.EXIT to
automatically run at close of a phantom.  The resolution on this was
that the user can simply add QUIT as the last command in their phantom,
which would force the ON.EXIT to run.

When this issue was again raised at 9.3.1.1, it was given as an
'enhancement', which at that time, meant you wouldn't ever see it.  If
we had even looked at it, we would have probably come to the same
conclusion as earlier; we could NOT change behavior if it would have
impacted existing applications.

I know its not an answer, but it is some history on this event.  I lived
it! :-)

Glenn
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] PCL point question.

2004-12-07 Thread George Gallen
I'm trying to put together some labels using PCL.

I was told to use 10point font. I'm using a font that is fixed, so the
printer
   is ignoring the point size setting esc ( s # V

I'm using the pitch setting instead esc ( s # H

one point is supposed to 1/72 of an inch. So 10 point should 10/72 of
inch
show it should be 7.2 cpi, but 7.2cpi is way larger than 10point text..

From what I read the point setting is vertical measurment. I can set the
printer for a vertical spacing of 7.2lpi, no problem. So would 17cpi
size
characters on a line setting of 7.2lpi pass for 10 point? that would be
17 pitch, 10 point ?

We were told by the USPS that when we produce mailing labels they
need to be 10point.

We are switching from a printronix line printer (now dead) to an HP
laser
printer for our labels, and wanted to use 3 across labels (down from 
4 across). Our old print size for 10cpi on the line printer. If we go
with
10 cpi, that's not enough space for 3 across on the laser, need 9

George

George Gallen
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Accounting/Data Division
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph:856.848.1000 Ext 220

SLACK Incorporated - An innovative information, education and management
company
http://www.slackinc.com
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] UV/NT resize failed - any way to put this file back tog ether?

2004-12-07 Thread Joe Walter
Thanks much paul. This is excellent info. I will stash this away in my
'tech-tips' folder for future use. 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Trebbien
 Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 5:53 PM
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: RE: [U2] UV/NT resize failed - any way to put this 
 file back tog ether?
 
 I assisted one of my customers with the very same issue a while back.
 Luckily, UniVerse creates a temporary copy of the file when 
 resizing it.
 Using the explorer go look at the folders for that file and 
 you should see one with an 'odd name', probably called 
 something like resizea00398.  When we discovered this file we 
 counted it and it had the correct number of records we were 
 looking for.
 
 To fix we did:
 * rebooted UniVerse so it would release a lock on the file
 * using nt explorer we renamed the problem file to something_xxx
 * using nt explorer we renamed that resizea00398 file to the 
 real filename
 * go to TCL and edit a record in that file - should be OK.
 
 Have a Great Day!
 
  Paul Trebbien
  Kore Technologies, Senior Support Tech. 
  Solutions that work. People who care.
  V 858.678.0030 F 858.300.2600 W www.koretech.com
  
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of 
 Adrian Matthews
 Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 1:31 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [U2] UV/NT resize failed - any way to put this 
 file back together?
 
 
 If you kill a telnet session that is running a resize on NT 
 then you need to kill the resize.exe process that it spawned 
 as well. Otherwise it just keeps on going as you found it. 
 There are quite a few processes on the NT version that work like that.
 
 
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Joe Walter
 Sent: Mon 06/12/2004 18:22
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [U2] UV/NT resize failed - any way to put this 
 file back together?
 
 
 
 unbelievable - i just felt i had to post a follow up to this.
 
 the resize process that we thought was dead and we closed the 
 telnet client that initiated the session and all - gave up on 
 it - thought it was a dead process.
 
 we would have expected it to run in less than 1/2 hour.
 
 well, anyway, low and behold when I got back onto that 
 customers system today to start restoring files - it turns 
 out that the resize actually finished up and the date/time 
 stamp makes it appear as if the resize ran for about 30+ 
 hours - but the point is it did actually finish - even after 
 we killed the telnet client that started the session - unbelievable.
 
 the mystery still is - why did it take so long. yes, the new 
 file sizing parameters where dead on and the old file size 
 wasn't all that far off either.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Walter
  Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 11:25 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [U2] UV/NT resize failed - any way to put this file back 
  together?
 
  was trying to resize a file on universe/NT and the process 
 obviously 
  got hosed up. it ran for upwards of three hours before we 
 gave up on 
  it.
 
  it is one of those blasted files with multiple data sections.
 
  so, we have the files
  AR
  and
  AR,HIST
 
  i was trying to resize AR,HIST. active users where 
 accessing only the 
  AR file itself, so i thought i could get by with resizing AR,HIST 
  while others where online. it looks like it started to work, but 
  should have completed in a matter of minutes based on past 
 experience, 
  so it did get hung up for some reason.
 
  if i display the files in the directory - i see the following:
 
  11/30/04  03:10pDIR  .
  11/30/04  03:10pDIR  ..
  11/30/04  03:05p 2,569,728 AR
  11/30/04  03:05p 5,343,232 HIST
  11/30/04  03:10p 4,093,440 resizea00355
 5 File(s) 12,006,400 bytes
  619,339,264 bytes free
 
 
  so, it looks like *maybe* the data for the HIST section and 
 this temp
  resizea00355 file might actually have the data, but when you try to 
  access the file AR,HIST from TCL your session just locks up.
 
  can still access just the live AR file - no problem there.
 
  anyone know how to piece this thing back together without restoring 
  from backups?
  ---
  u2-users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
 
 
 
 
 The information contained in this email is strictly 
 confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless 
 otherwise indicated.  If you are not the intended recipient, 
 please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this 
 message or any attachment.  Please also notify the sender by 
 replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 

Unclassified RE: [U2] PCL point question.

2004-12-07 Thread HENDERSON MIKE, MR
George,

If they're talking about a fixed-pitch font (like Courier), when they
say ten point they almost certainly mean ten pitch i.e. 10 c.p.i. -
your bog-standard IBM golfball typewriter font (if you're old enough to
remember the marvellous IBM golfball, of course!)

So I'd go with Courier 10cpi, it's probably fairly close to what your
old Printronix used to produce.

HTH

Mike

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Gallen
Sent: Wednesday, 8 December 2004 07:28
To: Ardent List
Subject: [U2] PCL point question.

I'm trying to put together some labels using PCL.

I was told to use 10point font. I'm using a font that is fixed, so the
printer
   is ignoring the point size setting esc ( s # V

I'm using the pitch setting instead esc ( s # H

one point is supposed to 1/72 of an inch. So 10 point should 10/72 of
inch show it should be 7.2 cpi, but 7.2cpi is way larger than 10point
text..

From what I read the point setting is vertical measurment. I can set the
printer for a vertical spacing of 7.2lpi, no problem. So would 17cpi
size characters on a line setting of 7.2lpi pass for 10 point? that
would be
17 pitch, 10 point ?

We were told by the USPS that when we produce mailing labels they need
to be 10point.

We are switching from a printronix line printer (now dead) to an HP
laser printer for our labels, and wanted to use 3 across labels (down
from
4 across). Our old print size for 10cpi on the line printer. If we go
with 10 cpi, that's not enough space for 3 across on the laser, need 9

George

George Gallen
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Accounting/Data Division
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph:856.848.1000 Ext 220

SLACK Incorporated - An innovative information, education and management
company http://www.slackinc.com
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or 
distribute this message or the information in it.

If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Windows firewall and UVODBC

2004-12-07 Thread Donald Kibbey
What version of windows are you using?  I don't think the firewall is loaded on 
the server versions.  If your using XP pro for your server, you might want to 
think about changing that.  Otherwise, the quickest method is to create an odbc 
link from the server to the server and run it to get the popup from the 
firewall.


Don Kibbey
Financial Systems Manager
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett  Dunner LLP


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/07/04 09:53AM 
DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify
the sender immediately.  Please note that there is no guarantee that
this email or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted
or amended.

The firewall is on the server, not the client machine.

The UVODBC on the server is part of Universe, so I can't just tell it to
allow the application access as far as I am aware, or do I tell it to
allow UV.EXE or something?

Also, there haven't been any pop up windows asking for access. This is
not like other firewalls that I am normally fine with.

Thanks 


Andy Moore
Selima Software Ltd.

-Original Message-
From: Donald Kibbey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 07 December 2004 14:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Re: [U2] Windows firewall and UVODBC

Add UVODBC to the exceptions.  You can do this one of two ways, one is
to make an UVODBC connection from the windows machine with the firewall
and wait for the firewall warning to come up.  The warning screen gives
you the option of allowing that program to contine and adding it to the
exceptions list.  The other way is to go into the control panel, find
the firewall applet and add UVODBC to the exceptions there.  


Don Kibbey
Financial Systems Manager
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett  Dunner LLP


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/07/04 07:33AM 
DISCLAIMER:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify
the sender immediately.  Please note that there is no guarantee that
this email or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted
or amended.

Hello,

We have Universe running on Windows with the Windows firewall installed,
but the firewall is stopping access to the UVODBC.

Normally I can configure firewalls to let the UVODBC through, but the
Windows one is not one that I am familiar with.

Has anyone got any experience with this and if so do you have the
settings required or any advice?

Thanks

Andy Moore
Selima Software Ltd
Tel: 0114 2815000
Fax: 0114 281
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ 
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ 
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] PCL point question.

2004-12-07 Thread Donald Kibbey
HP printers will attempt to match your font command with what is internal to 
the printer.  If there is not a perfect match, the next best match is used.  
This feature can be infuriating if you don't realize what's going on.  
Printout a font list from the printer and see if there's something internal 
that matches with what you want.  The newer HP's will also print the selection 
command along with the font sample.

If you have the HP docs or can obtain the pdf of them, there's a description in 
there that will tell you what parameters of the font selection command are used 
to guestimate a match if the exact match is not available.


Don Kibbey
Financial Systems Manager
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett  Dunner LLP


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/07/04 01:27PM 
I'm trying to put together some labels using PCL.

I was told to use 10point font. I'm using a font that is fixed, so the
printer
   is ignoring the point size setting esc ( s # V

I'm using the pitch setting instead esc ( s # H

one point is supposed to 1/72 of an inch. So 10 point should 10/72 of
inch
show it should be 7.2 cpi, but 7.2cpi is way larger than 10point text..

From what I read the point setting is vertical measurment. I can set the
printer for a vertical spacing of 7.2lpi, no problem. So would 17cpi
size
characters on a line setting of 7.2lpi pass for 10 point? that would be
17 pitch, 10 point ?

We were told by the USPS that when we produce mailing labels they
need to be 10point.

We are switching from a printronix line printer (now dead) to an HP
laser
printer for our labels, and wanted to use 3 across labels (down from 
4 across). Our old print size for 10cpi on the line printer. If we go
with
10 cpi, that's not enough space for 3 across on the laser, need 9

George

George Gallen
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Accounting/Data Division
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
ph:856.848.1000 Ext 220

SLACK Incorporated - An innovative information, education and management
company
http://www.slackinc.com 
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] PCL point question.

2004-12-07 Thread Computerized Data Mgmt Inc
George:
check these codes out:

  1)  Printer top-of-form  12
  2)  Slave printer on
27:119:119:27:51
  3)  Slave printer off27:52
  4)  10 characters per inch on   
27:40:115:49:48:72
  5)  6 lines per inch on  -
  6)  12 cpi on   
27:40:115:49:50:72
  7)  12 cpi off (10 cpi on)  
27:40:115:49:48:72
  8)  17 cpi on   
27:40:115:49:54:46:54:54:72
  9)  17 cpi off (10 cpi on)  
27:40:115:49:48:72
 10)  Double-wide ON   -
 11)  Double-wide off (10 cpi on)  -
 12)  Correspondence quality on   
27:40:115:49:66
 13)  Correspondence quality off  
27:40:115:48:66

--- George Gallen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm trying to put together some labels using PCL.
 
 I was told to use 10point font. I'm using a font
 that is fixed, so the
 printer
is ignoring the point size setting esc ( s # V
 
 I'm using the pitch setting instead esc ( s # H
 
 one point is supposed to 1/72 of an inch. So 10
 point should 10/72 of
 inch
 show it should be 7.2 cpi, but 7.2cpi is way larger
 than 10point text..
 
 From what I read the point setting is vertical
 measurment. I can set the
 printer for a vertical spacing of 7.2lpi, no
 problem. So would 17cpi
 size
 characters on a line setting of 7.2lpi pass for 10
 point? that would be
 17 pitch, 10 point ?
 
 We were told by the USPS that when we produce
 mailing labels they
 need to be 10point.
 
 We are switching from a printronix line printer (now
 dead) to an HP
 laser
 printer for our labels, and wanted to use 3 across
 labels (down from 
 4 across). Our old print size for 10cpi on the line
 printer. If we go
 with
 10 cpi, that's not enough space for 3 across on the
 laser, need 9
 
 George
 
 George Gallen
 Senior Programmer/Analyst
 Accounting/Data Division
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ph:856.848.1000 Ext 220
 
 SLACK Incorporated - An innovative information,
 education and management
 company
 http://www.slackinc.com
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe please visit
 http://listserver.u2ug.org/
 


=
Computerized Data Mgmt Inc
PO Box 3473
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72702
(479) 521-5670
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] PCL point question.

2004-12-07 Thread TPellitieri
George Gallen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:27:51
-0500

 I'm trying to put together some labels using PCL.

 I was told to use 10point font. I'm using a font that is fixed,
 so the printer is ignoring the point size setting esc ( s # V

 I'm using the pitch setting instead esc ( s # H

Point and Pitch sizes can be used in combination depending upon the font
(e.g., Letter Gothic permits 6.5pt and 12pt 10cpi on some older printers).
Courier is not one that accepts both, and pitch has precedence over point
size in this case.

Typically, Courier 10 Pitch is approximately 12 point, and Courier 12 Pitch
is approximately 10 point.  These sizes used to be called Pica (10cpi) and
Elite (12cpi), back when people typed letters as opposed to the typesetting
they can now do at their desktops.

We use Avery 5160 labels here, which are 10 labels per 8.5x11 page, 3
across, 10 down.  I use the following setup strings.  The font [(s] selects
12cpi Courier.  The Page format [l] (that's the letter L) provides for 8
lines per inch, a 4 line top margin, and 80 printed lines per page.

(esc) (s0p12h0s0b4099T (esc) l8d4e80F

My label settings for a SORT-LABEL command in UniData are 3 columns, 7
rows, 1 row skipped between labels, 0 indent, 30 columns per label, 3
blanks between labels.  The control string is the first line of the output
file.  Lines 2-8 contain 7 rows of label data, and line 9 is blank.
Subsequent labels use another 7 lines of data followed by one blank.

Hope this helps.

--Tom Pellitieri
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] UniObject SubKeys

2004-12-07 Thread UmFooFoo Murphy
Hello All,
I have an application that needs to be able to connect multiple times to a 
Universe Session.  When I run this application on my local PC I am unable to 
connect to my local Universe while the application is running.  Likewise, I 
am unable to run the application while connected to a local Universe 
session.  I was told to use SubKeys to solve this problem and even though I 
read and obeyed the blurb about SubKeys in the UniObjects documentation, it 
still does not work.

I have a TheSubKey as Long variable that I increment each time I connect 
to UniObjects, like this:

   TheSubKey = TheSubKey + 1: ObjSession.SubKey = Str(TheSubKey)
   ObjSession.Connect
I used the Str() because results from a google search suggested that the 
subkey needs to be a string value.  I have also tried it without using the 
Str() like this:

   TheSubKey = TheSubKey + 1: ObjSession.SubKey = TheSubKey
   ObjSession.Connect
Can anyone point me in the right direction please?
thanks
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] [ot] hpux11/uv10 validate user login

2004-12-07 Thread Craig Bennett
Gerry,
Their web interface is driven built on redback  I have zero experience with or knowledge of it.  I would have thought os(unix) level user authentication would have been handled within redback as part of its basic design/functionality.  True or not true ?
Your problem is a security issue. For a process to be able to access the 
 password database on unix it needs root permissions. Because your 
redback processes have already authenticated and run with lower 
permissions than root, they cannot access this database.

To authenticate against the HPUX password database I think you will 
either need to create a setuid executable owned by root (which takes the 
permissions of the file owner when run) and then use Ken's suggestion 
for accessing the password database; or use a separate system such as 
LDAP which allows secure access to authentication data.

In general, the use of setuid executables to do this sort of job is 
discouraged as they tend to bypass operating system rules about how many 
times and how often a user can attempt to authenticate before they are 
locked our or delayed.

I don't think Redback will be able to access the HPUX database directly 
except via something like LDAP (although you could try installing ssh on 
HPUX and getting an SSH library and having your redback process do an 
ssh authentication separtely from their direct access to UV).

HTH,
Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] UniObject SubKeys

2004-12-07 Thread Bjorn Behr
What error code are you getting when UniObjects does not want to connect?

Regards
Bjorn 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of UmFooFoo Murphy
Sent: 07 December 2004 11:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] UniObject SubKeys

Hello All,

I have an application that needs to be able to connect multiple times to a
Universe Session.  When I run this application on my local PC I am unable to
connect to my local Universe while the application is running.  Likewise, I
am unable to run the application while connected to a local Universe
session.  I was told to use SubKeys to solve this problem and even though I
read and obeyed the blurb about SubKeys in the UniObjects documentation, it
still does not work.

I have a TheSubKey as Long variable that I increment each time I connect
to UniObjects, like this:

TheSubKey = TheSubKey + 1: ObjSession.SubKey = Str(TheSubKey)
ObjSession.Connect

I used the Str() because results from a google search suggested that the
subkey needs to be a string value.  I have also tried it without using the
Str() like this:

TheSubKey = TheSubKey + 1: ObjSession.SubKey = TheSubKey
ObjSession.Connect


Can anyone point me in the right direction please?

thanks
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/