Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

2011-02-03 Thread Tony Gravagno
 From: Steve Romanow
 Look at the number of language bindings for most db's.  U2 has
2, and
 they are ok, but only 2.  MongoDB has like 10-20.

That problem is easily fixed technically.  Language bindings
don't need to come from the DBMS vendors.  And let's face it,
they aren't that creative and they don't want to invest too much
unless they see tangible returns in terms of license sales.  So
this like other projects will have to be a community undertaking
anyway, as it is with every other platform out there.  I've
already started this project actually, and run it by some
respected community members to validate the concept.

As always, the problem is that projects like this, for the good
of everyone, tend to fall on the few who often can afford it the
least.

I'm going to use I and me below, but this applies to anyone
in this market who does free development as a community service.
There are a lot of us here.

I create things like language bindings because I think it's cool
and because it will help our market.  In the mean time there are
people fearing for loss of their jobs because their platform of
choice is too obscure and missing language bindings (for example)
that are common everywhere else.  Demand/motivation and
supply/desire in this market must learn to meet in the middle.

I know if I solicit donations so that I can pay my mortgage while
providing you (collectively) with something that will increase
the value of your platform, I'll be shunned for trying to sell
yet another product (what a concept *sigh*).  The public outcry
will be deafening but it should be FREE, implying of course
that someone else should do the work for free for everyone's
benefit, like it is (supposedly) in the rest of the world.  With
no motivation, this project that has been in the queue for about
two years, will remain on the bottom of the TODO list, and may
never get finished.

(Personal note:  And for anyone who thinks I only do things
for-fee, look for my name at Codeplex, Sourceforge, github, and
elsewhere.  I do contribute to FOSS, and I contribute freeware to
this market as well.  But when my free time translates to someone
else's profitability or continued employment, I don't think it's
unreasonable to ask for something in return.  Generous does not
equal stupid.)

But if neither I nor anyone else does this (for free or fee), the
net result will be that some years later people will still be
lamenting in forums that such things don't exist and that it
should all come from the DBMS vendors.  Nothing will change.
I've been saying that for years and here we are - nothing has
changed.  That fundamental mindset is really what cripples this
market.  That's also what doesn't change.  It's not a lack of
communication tools, language bindings, admin utilities, or other
things people mention occasionally.  If people attach value to
things they say are valuable to them, this market may actually
move forward a little.

Tony Gravagno
Nebula Research and Development
TG@ remove.pleaseNebula-RnD.com
remove.pleaseNebula-RnD.com/blog
Visit PickWiki.com! Contribute!
http://Twitter.com/TonyGravagno

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

2011-02-03 Thread Symeon Breen
As ever well said Tony

However I do think the DBMS vendor needs to take some responsibility, the
reason why mongo DB has so many language bindings (i am a big fan of mongo
btw) is because the dbms supplier has provided many resources and open code
itself to the market. Who on this list would know where to start writing
language bindings into u2 - how much help would rocket give to the community
- and what licensing restrictions will we be burdened with if we did it 
maybe this is something for the better and better group ??

 

From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: 03 February 2011 08:34
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

 

 From: Steve Romanow
 Look at the number of language bindings for most db's.  U2 has
2, and
 they are ok, but only 2.  MongoDB has like 10-20.

That problem is easily fixed technically.  Language bindings
don't need to come from the DBMS vendors.  And let's face it,
they aren't that creative and they don't want to invest too much
unless they see tangible returns in terms of license sales.  So
this like other projects will have to be a community undertaking
anyway, as it is with every other platform out there.  I've
already started this project actually, and run it by some
respected community members to validate the concept.

As always, the problem is that projects like this, for the good
of everyone, tend to fall on the few who often can afford it the
least.

I'm going to use I and me below, but this applies to anyone
in this market who does free development as a community service.
There are a lot of us here.

I create things like language bindings because I think it's cool
and because it will help our market.  In the mean time there are
people fearing for loss of their jobs because their platform of
choice is too obscure and missing language bindings (for example)
that are common everywhere else.  Demand/motivation and
supply/desire in this market must learn to meet in the middle.

I know if I solicit donations so that I can pay my mortgage while
providing you (collectively) with something that will increase
the value of your platform, I'll be shunned for trying to sell
yet another product (what a concept *sigh*).  The public outcry
will be deafening but it should be FREE, implying of course
that someone else should do the work for free for everyone's
benefit, like it is (supposedly) in the rest of the world.  With
no motivation, this project that has been in the queue for about
two years, will remain on the bottom of the TODO list, and may
never get finished.

(Personal note:  And for anyone who thinks I only do things
for-fee, look for my name at Codeplex, Sourceforge, github, and
elsewhere.  I do contribute to FOSS, and I contribute freeware to
this market as well.  But when my free time translates to someone
else's profitability or continued employment, I don't think it's
unreasonable to ask for something in return.  Generous does not
equal stupid.)

But if neither I nor anyone else does this (for free or fee), the
net result will be that some years later people will still be
lamenting in forums that such things don't exist and that it
should all come from the DBMS vendors.  Nothing will change.
I've been saying that for years and here we are - nothing has
changed.  That fundamental mindset is really what cripples this
market.  That's also what doesn't change.  It's not a lack of
communication tools, language bindings, admin utilities, or other
things people mention occasionally.  If people attach value to
things they say are valuable to them, this market may actually
move forward a little.

Tony Gravagno
Nebula Research and Development
TG@ remove.pleaseNebula-RnD.com
remove.pleaseNebula-RnD.com/blog
Visit PickWiki.com! Contribute!
http://Twitter.com/TonyGravagno

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users 

  _  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3418 - Release Date: 02/02/11

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

2011-02-03 Thread Michael McGlothlin
I doubt a visual tool will ever be faster than text for problems of any 
complexity. If you have a lot of boilerplate code you either aren't coding very 
well or your programming language needs to evolve. Not that that helps if you 
have to deal with 300,000 lines of somebody elses code in some backwards 
ancient language.

A lot of code could already be done with AI techniques, and is a hobby of mine, 
assuming you know what you want. My experience though is that programmers can 
find the solutions you need instead of what you asked for.

I hate proprietary software because of license issues. The cost isn't near as 
much an issue as figuring out licensing, poor documentation, and poor support. 
I don't want to spend days on the phone with some hotshot kid that knows diddly 
but keeps giving attitude.


Thanks,
Michael McGlothlin
Sent from my iPad

On Feb 2, 2011, at 10:15 PM, Dan McGrath dmc...@imb.com.au wrote:

 That's a false argument. They have been pandering that line ever since
 programming started as a profession. After all, wasn't that COBOL was
 meant to do? The business can do it!
 
 Programmers are NOT people who merely read/write code. 
 
 Programmers are problem solvers. It will also be a speciality. At least
 until (if ever) we have a suitable AI and in that case, say good bye to
 almost every job and say hello to the world of Wall-E.
 
 As to being one of those people, while I may not have 40+ years
 experience, I've done everything from x86 ASM to .NET. What I appreciate
 are tools which can help abstract away pointless boilerplate code,
 reduce typing (Intellipoint), increase maintainability, scalability,
 etc. I want to concentrate on the business logic, not work out how I
 have to redesign solutions because the DB licence structure is
 restrictive (and excessively prohibitive in the age of the web).
 
 -Original Message-
 From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
 [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jerry
 Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2011 3:48 PM
 To: U2 Users List
 Subject: Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?
 
 Be careful what you wish for. I didn't start out as a programmer, my
 degree is in Electronics Engineering, my early career was designing,
 building, and repairing many of the early computer systems. As time went
 on I had to change what I was doing because with throw away computer
 parts you no longer need a person that can tell you what is inside of
 the box all you need is someone that can replace it. The same thing is
 happening in the software business. With all of the new point and click
 tools you will eventually no longer need someone that can actually read
 code. Why do you think all of the software jobs are being outsourced. A
 person that needs to read code is no longer needed. As soon as they can
 figure out how to make the tools build logic into it, you're gone. It's
 not that far in the future. Now if you are one of the people that could
 never read the code or make heads or tails of business logic I can see
 why you would want the stuff that does it for you, but I don't think you
 are.
 
 Jerry
 
 On 2/2/2011 9:42 PM, Dan McGrath wrote:
 There are people who work on/drive cars much older than that. Yes, 
 they still work, are functional and can sometimes look amazing. When 
 it comes to utility though, they rarely match the total feature set 
 available on the newer cars. Side  Passenger Airbags, smoother rides,
 
 5 star safety ratings, air conditioning...
 
 Point being, just because something is old and still in use, doesn't 
 mean it is the best solution either technically or productively wise. 
 It can have its place, but not every place. Unless of course they 
 continue to evolve it, not just keep it running.
 
 I love MV databases and the unique opportunities it presents. It also 
 has its issues that have been solved for a long time in 'the newest 
 fashion fad' for which the MV databases desperately need to catch up 
 with. Well, that is if they really want to increase the 
 development/market share of the product, as opposed to merely 
 'supporting' current ISV solutions just enough to stop people 
 absolutely needing to migrate away.
 
 * If I had anything remotely as useful/polished as Visual Studio to 
 develop my life would be bliss.
 **  Development toolset in general is severely lacking
 * Licence model is frustration+ if you stray away from Telnet sessions
 ** It's so open to interpretation its ridiculous
 
 -Original Message-
 From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
 [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jerry
 Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2011 2:09 PM
 To: U2 Users List
 Subject: Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?
 
 There are people on this list that have been working with this 
 database for 40 years or more, can you say that about the products you
 
 are so hyped up on. This database/environment/platform has outlived 
 all other databases. It has outlived it's creators. It 

Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

2011-02-03 Thread FFT2001
Tony I think you're missing something here if I may be so BOLD, since I'm 
never ever bold...  ok anyway to be serious

In the history of our community, there have been people who developed a 
product, created a market for it, that was evidently so interesting to one of 
the hardware/os vendors, that they got bought up.  It's true.

So I wouldn't say that it's not possible to write something NOT from an os 
vendor, and yet be a marketable *tool* (not business application).  I 
believe, I've encountered several tools and systems programs that were 
third-party 
add-ons.  And then I blink and suddenly... its part of Adds or whoever.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

2011-02-03 Thread Steve Romanow
That is part of the business environment though.  Apple bought CUPS,
Bottomline bought Optio.  Oracle bought mysql, java, and openoffice.

The only real protection is know your licensing, and be prepared to
replace any part of your  stack if the application functionality,
usage terms, or support costs get too onerous.

Since I am not a tool vendor, but a tool user the only real allegiance
I have is to my employer and myself.

I can see how it can be tough to pay a mortgage selling tools.

 So I wouldn't say that it's not possible to write something NOT from an os
 vendor, and yet be a marketable *tool* (not business application).  I
 believe, I've encountered several tools and systems programs that were 
 third-party
 add-ons.  And then I blink and suddenly... its part of Adds or whoever.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] How to find and fix a broken lock?

2011-02-03 Thread inquieti

Has a Uv errlog been set up?  Is there anything in the errlog to suggest a
problem?

Dan Fitzgerald wrote:
 
 
 I don't think it's a lock problem for your record. Much more likely is a
 data problem. Also a possibility is file corruption. Third thing that pops
 to mind is the program that does the update encountering a weird condition
 that sends it into a rarely used set of instructions.
  
 I'd also look for a null (or weird, or incorrect) value in a foreign key.
 I once worked at an HMO where somebody somehow created a null vendor
 record. So, every doctor who didn't have a vendor record had a null in
 that field, and this little 4-doc practice, the null vendor, was getting
 checks for $2-5M every month. You'd think they'd be happy, but they
 actually were a bit freaked out about it.
  
 What generates the order number? Are there conditions where that logic can
 fail?
  
 This sounds like an excellent opportunity to use the debugger. Set a break
 point in the program, and step through, examining the variables as you go.
 Pay special attention to whatever generates/assembles the order #.
  
 From: micha...@plumbersstock.com
 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:35:48 -0700
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: Re: [U2] How to find and fix a broken lock?
 
 I don't see it listed. Here is what it did return. I'm looking for entity
 40936.
 
 
 list.readu every
 
 Active Group Locks: Record Group Group
 Group
 Device Inode Netnode Userno Lmode G-Address. Locks ...RD ...SH
 ...EX
 2686979 462014 0 53135 5 IN 10D000 1 0 0
 0
 2686979 7005 0 53135 24 IN 4800 1 0 0
 0
 655364 4098 0 57139 26 IN 1 1 0 0
 0
 2686979 462014 0 53135 31 IN 23A000 1 0 0
 0
 2686979 154 0 40639 42 IN 600 2 0 0
 0
 2686979 7039 0 40789 59 RD 5AAE000 0 1 0
 0
 2686979 154 0 44775 64 IN 1600 1 0 0
 0
 2686979 154 0 53135 80 IN 1000 1 0 0
 0
 2686979 462014 0 53135 81 IN 521000 1 0 0
 0
 2686979 462014 0 53135 81 IN 5E3000 1 0 0
 0
 
 Active Record Locks:
 Device Inode Netnode Userno Lmode Pid Login Id
 Item-ID.
 2686979 462014 0 61405 5 RU 528386 eclipseB
 %WEB.PH.SESSION.MONITOR
 2686979 7005 0 57139 24 RU 368822 eclipseB
 FAX.FEEDBACK3
 655364 4098 0 57139 26 RU 368822 eclipseB fax_feed3
 2686979 462014 0 52985 31 RU 471274 eclipseB
 WIDGET.PHANTOM
 2686979 154 0 40639 42 RU 1302770 eclipseB
 JOB.SCHEDULER
 2686979 154 0 65263 42 RU 1179848 eclipseB
 TC.TIMESHEET.PH.SERVER
 2686979 154 0 44775 64 RU 512250 eclipseB
 SOCKET.PH.SERVER
 Press any key to continue...
 2686979 154 0 53135 80 RU 1683466 eclipseB
 SYSTEM.ADMIN
 2686979 462014 0 65461 81 RU 557096 eclipseB
 THREAD.MANAGER
 2686979 462014 0 52973 81 RU 1061074 eclipseB
 MSG.PH.SERVER
 
 
 
 Thanks,
 Michael McGlothlin
 
 
 
 On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Dan Fitzgerald dangf...@hotmail.com
 wrote:
 
  What does the TCL command LIST.READU EVERY return?
 
  Do you see that customer # or order # in there?
 
  From: micha...@plumbersstock.com
  Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:26:18 -0700
  To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
  Subject: [U2] How to find and fix a broken lock?
 
  I'm not greatly familiar with Universe but I have a background in
  programming and Unix so I hope I can figure this problem out. I have
  access to AIX and DataVu Query.
 
  We use Activant Eclipse which seems to be built on Universe and their
  support is completely useless. Their technical support keeps blaming
  our problem on a network issue which doesn't even make sense and their
  networking department has already proven isn't the issue. We've been
  working with them on the issue for more than a month without progress
  so I need to find another way to fix the issue.
 
  We have a process that takes a customer id and some order parameters
  and pushes an order into the system and returns the resulting order
  number or an error. Our problem is that for a certain customer that we
  use a lot is that it allows the order to be pushed in, without
  failing, but does not return an order number or an error. Orders from
  other customers work as expected. Originally the problem started when
  we were pulling a report for that customer with their order history -
  which failed. To me this suggests that someplace there is a lock in
  place for that customer that hasn't been removed or something of that
  nature. Any ideas how I could look for this or fix it?
 
 
  Thanks,
  Michael McGlothlin
  ___
  U2-Users mailing list
  U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
  http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
 
  ___
  U2-Users mailing list
  U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
  http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
 
 ___
 U2-Users mailing list
 U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
 http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
 
 ___
 U2-Users mailing list
 

[U2] [Announcement]International Spectrum Florida 2011 Conference

2011-02-03 Thread Nathan Rector

International Spectrum Conference and Exhibition

Attend the Premier MultiValue User Event
April 4th-7th

Benefits 

International Spectrum makes a special effort to bring together
the tools you need to make sure you and your MultiValue (UniVerse,
UniData, D3, jBase, OpenInsight, Reality, QM, Cache') Enterprise stay 
on the competitive edge.  Whether you are an end user, a vendor, 
or an independent consultant, you get to talk to MultiValue 
(UniVerse, UniData, D3, jBase, OpenInsight, Reality, QM, Cache')
experts
and see the latest products, tools, software releases, and general
corporate updates from the vendors and database providers.

Work Smarter, Not Harder!

Join us for session topics that will help you maximize your existing
business system with as little effort as possible, and still say
on-time and in-budget.  We include session on Reporting and Business
Intelligence, Web development, as well as many other detail technical
sessions you need to manage and maintain your MultiValue Enterprise.

Highlights

- Learn from Premier MultiValue Consultants at your choice of
  in-depth educational sessions.

- Expand your knowledge at vendor-sponsored training and
  demonstrations.

- Learn about the new products, tools, and features available to
  the MultiValue community.


Register Now - Save $200.00 before
February 23rd
http://www.intl-spectrum.com/conference/show/11/default.aspx

8 Weeks Left

Full Conference Package: $895.00
1 Day Conference Package: $695.00

After February 23rd

Full Conference Package: $1,095.00
1 Day Conference Package: $795.00


More Information:
http://www.intl-spectrum.com/conference/show/11/default.aspx



Hotel Information:

PGA Resort
800-633-9150
Room Rate: Single/Double $159.00
Special Rate Cut-off: March 14th



















___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

2011-02-03 Thread Dan McGrath
The problem as I see it Tony is twofold.

1) By having to pay for something as elemental as language bindings, you
are effectively limiting U2 to already established companies. Why would
a start-up pay to experiment with U2 when there are better supported
*free* development stacks with larger communities? It doesn't make
sense. That's why U2 is limited and won't grow beyond the small
community that already uses it.

2) Is it really that easily fixed without Rocket? How do create a
language binding for U2 without several issues. Firstly, UniObjects is a
bad interface on a security level (really, if I need to call a
subroutine, the port allows them to run ECL commands as well? Is this
1980?), so building a binding on top of that is a horrible idea if you
intend it to be widespread. So if not UniObjects, what? Native phantoms
cannot fork so we cannot have an effective service running without an
external OS dependent multiplexer in between. Yes, I can see people be
lured by a DB that requires you to not only set it up, but also another
service separated (and downloaded separated) just to use their language
of choice when MySQL and brethren are supported out of the box. 

It isn't a matter of what you *can* do, it is how easily and effective
you can do it compared to the other available stacks. When I develop in
my free time where I don't have access to work's systems, why would I
bother with U2 where I have to build not only the tool chain myself, but
also the language bindings (or pay for them) when I can fire up CakePHP
+ MySQL where all already exists, is well documented, large support
communities and it is easy to find other developers already skilled in
it.

Don't get me wrong though, I completely respect that you cannot always
offer the toil of hours for free. It shouldn't be an issue with basic
development tools though, why should we, as a community, build the
toolset for a vendor to ultimately profit from? That's where Rocket's
responsibility comes in. Their product, their prerogative as to whether
they simply support the existing status quo or actively enable new
players to enter the and expand the market space.


-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2011 7:34 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

 From: Steve Romanow
 Look at the number of language bindings for most db's.  U2 has
2, and
 they are ok, but only 2.  MongoDB has like 10-20.

That problem is easily fixed technically.  Language bindings don't need
to come from the DBMS vendors.  And let's face it, they aren't that
creative and they don't want to invest too much unless they see tangible
returns in terms of license sales.  So this like other projects will
have to be a community undertaking anyway, as it is with every other
platform out there.  I've already started this project actually, and run
it by some respected community members to validate the concept.

As always, the problem is that projects like this, for the good of
everyone, tend to fall on the few who often can afford it the least.

I'm going to use I and me below, but this applies to anyone in this
market who does free development as a community service.
There are a lot of us here.

I create things like language bindings because I think it's cool and
because it will help our market.  In the mean time there are people
fearing for loss of their jobs because their platform of choice is too
obscure and missing language bindings (for example) that are common
everywhere else.  Demand/motivation and supply/desire in this market
must learn to meet in the middle.

I know if I solicit donations so that I can pay my mortgage while
providing you (collectively) with something that will increase the value
of your platform, I'll be shunned for trying to sell yet another product
(what a concept *sigh*).  The public outcry will be deafening but it
should be FREE, implying of course that someone else should do the work
for free for everyone's benefit, like it is (supposedly) in the rest of
the world.  With no motivation, this project that has been in the queue
for about two years, will remain on the bottom of the TODO list, and may
never get finished.

(Personal note:  And for anyone who thinks I only do things for-fee,
look for my name at Codeplex, Sourceforge, github, and elsewhere.  I do
contribute to FOSS, and I contribute freeware to this market as well.
But when my free time translates to someone else's profitability or
continued employment, I don't think it's unreasonable to ask for
something in return.  Generous does not equal stupid.)

But if neither I nor anyone else does this (for free or fee), the net
result will be that some years later people will still be lamenting in
forums that such things don't exist and that it should all come from the
DBMS vendors.  Nothing will change.
I've been saying that for years 

[U2] Scripps Networking Services

2011-02-03 Thread Bessel, Karen
Has anybody heard about a job opportunity with this company, contact names Dan 
Maxwell and/or Jenna Wade?

I heard from them yesterday  I want to know if anybody else has. They seem to 
be looking for Pick/U2 people.




Karen Bessel
Developer
Tyler Technologies, Inc.

972.713.3770 ext: 113472
www.tylertech.com
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] U2U Australia

2011-02-03 Thread Dan McGrath
Looks like it will be a small conference ;)

See you there.

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org 
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kate Stanton
Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2011 1:19 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] U2U Australia

Hi Dan,  Yes, I and my sister Eleanor have registered.  See you there!
 Cheers, Kate

Kate Stanton
Walstan Systems Ltd
4 Kelmarna Ave, Herne Bay, Auckland 1011, New Zealand
Phone: + 64 9 360 5310  Mobile: + 64 21 400 486
Email: k...@walstan.com


On 3 February 2011 10:41, Dan McGrath dmc...@imb.com.au wrote:
 Anyone on here registered for U2U Aus yet?

 I want to try and put faces to names (or email addresses) when I'm 
 there
 :)
 ##
 # The information transmitted in this message and 
 attachments (if any) is intended only for the person or entity to 
 which it is addressed. The message may contain confidential and/or 
 privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or 
 other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information 
 by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is 
 prohibited.  If you received this in error, please contact the sender and 
 delete the material from any computer.

 The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce, 
 disclose or distribute the information contained in this e-mail and any 
 attached files with the permission of IMB.
 ##
 # ___
 U2-Users mailing list
 U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
 http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__
###
The information transmitted in this message and attachments (if any) is 
intended only
for the person or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain 
confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of
or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or 
entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error, 
please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce, disclose or 
distribute
the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files with the 
permission of IMB.
###
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] U2U Australia

2011-02-03 Thread rayw

I'm now registered.  See youse all there!
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


[U2] Ultimate UPDATE process migration path ? anyone? anyone ?

2011-02-03 Thread fft2001

 

Let's say, you happen to stumble across a site that is using Ultimate's UPDATE 
processor.  Did any other vendor ever have a migration path off this ?  Ever?

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

2011-02-03 Thread Tony Gravagno
 From: Wol
 The problem is, where do you put the layers. That's my 
 beef with relational, the layer is in COMPLETELY the 
 wrong place. This means a large chunk of information, 
 which *belongs* in the database layer, *has* to be put 
 into the business layer.

That inspired another blog.  :)
Multi-tier coding patterns with MV
nospamNebula-RnD.com/blog/tech/mv/2011/02/mv-patterns1.html

T

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] The sky is so falling! {Unclassified}

2011-02-03 Thread Larry Hiscock
There's no place like ::1   ;-)

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of HENDERSON MIKE,
MR
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 2:29 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] The sky is so falling! {Unclassified}

In case you hadn't already heard, IANA has allocated the last blocks of
IPv4 addresses to the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs). There are *NO
MORE*, the cupboard is bare. 
See, amongst what will doubtless be lots of others,
http://www.apnic.net/final-five.


If AfriNIC is your RIR, you'll probably be able to get an IPv4 address
allocation for several years.
IF APNIC (which serves China, India, Korea and Japan as well as
Australia  NZ) is your RIR, you'll be flat out of luck before Christmas
- some commentators say as soon as July.


So, how IPv6 Ready is the U2 community?
How IPv6 Ready are you? 
E.g. Have you got any tables where you store IP addresses? If so, what
happens when you need to store and display/list
DEAD:BEEF::1020:17AA:0236:1AAA instead of 192.168.215.132? 


The fun is about to start
:-)


Regards


Mike

 
The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or 
distribute this message or the information in it.

If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

2011-02-03 Thread Bill Haskett
This reminds me of the spare light bulbs in our home.  My wife keeps 
them in five (5) different places.  I keep complaining I can never find 
the right light bulb for the right light fixture with a burned out 
bulb.  :-)


When software is spread around like the spare light bulbs in our house, 
perhaps this should alert us that things aren't very good, and the 
industry needs to take a good hard look at their practices.  :-)


Bill


Tony Gravagno said the following on 2/3/2011 2:48 PM:

From: Wol
The problem is, where do you put the layers. That's my
beef with relational, the layer is in COMPLETELY the
wrong place. This means a large chunk of information,
which *belongs* in the database layer, *has* to be put
into the business layer.

That inspired another blog.  :)
Multi-tier coding patterns with MV
nospamNebula-RnD.com/blog/tech/mv/2011/02/mv-patterns1.html

T

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


[U2] Universe Books?

2011-02-03 Thread Michael McGlothlin
I'm trying to find books on Universe but very little seems to come up. Is
there anything you can recommend for someone trying to teach themselves?


Thanks,
Michael McGlothlin
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Universe Books?

2011-02-03 Thread Dan McGrath
Brian Leach has some. http://www.brianleach.co.uk/pages/books.htm 

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Michael
McGlothlin
Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 10:31 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Universe Books?

I'm trying to find books on Universe but very little seems to come up.
Is there anything you can recommend for someone trying to teach
themselves?


Thanks,
Michael McGlothlin
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
###
The information transmitted in this message and attachments (if any) is 
intended only
for the person or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain 
confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of
or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or 
entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error, 
please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce, disclose or 
distribute
the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files with the 
permission of IMB.
###
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

2011-02-03 Thread Glen Batchelor

 -Original Message-
 From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-
 boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
 Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 3:34 AM
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?
 
  From: Steve Romanow
  Look at the number of language bindings for most db's.  U2 has
 2, and
  they are ok, but only 2.  MongoDB has like 10-20.
 
 That problem is easily fixed technically.  Language bindings
 don't need to come from the DBMS vendors.  And let's face it,
 they aren't that creative and they don't want to invest too much
 unless they see tangible returns in terms of license sales.  So
 this like other projects will have to be a community undertaking
 anyway, as it is with every other platform out there.  I've
 already started this project actually, and run it by some
 respected community members to validate the concept.
 


  Actually I think they should be responsible, but the decisions of which
bindings are made available should only be driven by the community. The
vendor knows their own product and what it is capable of better than anyone
else. All-Spec sells product for a profit as a way to operate but we are
also solutions providers on many facets. With that in mind I see parallels
here compared to a DB vendor offering a product that works as part of a
business solution. To that end, I would never spend time and money
researching and building web services or desktop applications for our
customers if they have no use for them. Why should the DB vendor spend time
and money building a language binding that no wants and is not readily
useable in an existing business solution? On the flip side, I also would not
leave it up to our customers to build their own inquiry app that scrapes our
web pages for stock and pricing. I would prefer to provide them with a
proper interface that fits their needs so we can finish the job and move on
to other tasks. Unfortunately, unless both sides are eager to meet in the
middle for the benefit of both then a symbiotic relationship will never
happen. In many cases the possibility of such a relationship is never
discussed or offered and therefore a lack of technological capability is
wrongfully perceived.

 
 As always, the problem is that projects like this, for the good
 of everyone, tend to fall on the few who often can afford it the
 least.


   We've both started building fires that smoldered and died due to a lack
of attention. At some point you have to move on when it becomes obvious that
the community is not interested. When you know your vision is right, though,
you should step back and change your scope of view on the project. The
approach you're taking may be the primary incentive for your involvement,
but the goal is just wrong. The opposite is also true as I've experienced.
The goal may be popular but the original approach to get there is too
convoluted or requires too many different skill sets to establish a
functioning starter project. 


 
 I'm going to use I and me below, but this applies to anyone
 in this market who does free development as a community service.
 There are a lot of us here.
 
 I create things like language bindings because I think it's cool
 and because it will help our market.  In the mean time there are
 people fearing for loss of their jobs because their platform of
 choice is too obscure and missing language bindings (for example)
 that are common everywhere else.  Demand/motivation and
 supply/desire in this market must learn to meet in the middle.
 


  You can't save the inept or the obstinate so don't expect solutions for
them to bring you income. Make your fun tools, during your free time,
because you want to. I know you do that and I do that too. I just don't
publish them anymore. :) FOSS is a great way to enhance technology, but only
if the end-users trust the developers and are willing to work hand-in-hand
with them to keep the project moving. How often is it that a tool or
solution is dropped in, plugged up, and then forgotten about for years? Most
of the solutions deployed in our community are rock-solid performers and
they don't need much attention once they're deployed. You can't expect just
anyone to pick up a FOSS project that's a year old, backed by 2 or 3
periodic coders and say I just gotta play with that on our 1000-user
system.


 I know if I solicit donations so that I can pay my mortgage while
 providing you (collectively) with something that will increase
 the value of your platform, I'll be shunned for trying to sell
 yet another product (what a concept *sigh*).  The public outcry
 will be deafening but it should be FREE, implying of course
 that someone else should do the work for free for everyone's
 benefit, like it is (supposedly) in the rest of the world.  With
 no motivation, this project that has been in the queue for about
 two years, will remain on the bottom of the TODO list, and may
 never get finished.
 
 (Personal 

Re: [U2] Universe Books?

2011-02-03 Thread fft2001

 Yes give me fifteen minutes, I'm building the list now.

 


 

 

-Original Message-
From: Michael McGlothlin micha...@plumbersstock.com
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Thu, Feb 3, 2011 3:31 pm
Subject: [U2] Universe Books?


I'm trying to find books on Universe but very little seems to come up. Is

there anything you can recommend for someone trying to teach themselves?





Thanks,

Michael McGlothlin

___

U2-Users mailing list

U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org

http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users




 
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] The sky is so falling! {Unclassified}

2011-02-03 Thread Allen E. Elwood
I had to read that five times before I got it. lol 

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Larry Hiscock
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 2:52 PM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] The sky is so falling! {Unclassified}

There's no place like ::1   ;-)

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of HENDERSON MIKE,
MR
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 2:29 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] The sky is so falling! {Unclassified}

In case you hadn't already heard, IANA has allocated the last blocks of
snip


The fun is about to start
:-)


Regards


Mike

 

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Universe Books?

2011-02-03 Thread fft2001



Okay Michael go here
http://knol.google.com/k/pick-universe-unidata-resources#view

near the bottom of the page there is a heading Other Media and I've listed 
three books there on Pick

 



-Original Message-

From: Michael McGlothlin micha...@plumbersstock.com

To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

Sent: Thu, Feb 3, 2011 3:31 pm

Subject: [U2] Universe Books?





I'm trying to find books on Universe but very little seems to come up. Is



there anything you can recommend for someone trying to teach themselves?











Thanks,



Michael McGlothlin




___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Universe Books?

2011-02-03 Thread Bill Brutzman
The book to get is Malcolm Bull's The Pick Programming Language, Chapman  
Hall, London, (c) 1994, ISBN  0 412 46660 0.  

Also, there are some outstanding resources at www.brianleach.co.uk   folder tab 
Books.

--Bill
 
- Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org 
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Michael McGlothlin
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 6:31 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Universe Books?

I'm trying to find books on Universe but very little seems to come up. Is there 
anything you can recommend for someone trying to teach themselves?


Thanks,
Michael McGlothlin
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

2011-02-03 Thread fft2001

 
 I agree with Glen here.  Every cool tool with which I've ever been involved, 
has been actually written for some customer, on their dime.  Then some 
agreement was reached at some point, that the tool could be marketed 
separately.  And voila, we have a hundred tools running around the marketplace 
(or at least we did before 75 of them were gobbled up by hardware vendors).

If there is enough of a market interest than all the specialized hooks 
embedded for Customer X and Y have to be removed before the product is really 
saleable, or else you have to tell the customer you have to customize it for 
them, which really means taking out all the special hooks while they pay for it 
:)



 

-Original Message-
From: Glen Batchelor webmas...@all-spec.com
To: 'U2 Users List' u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Thu, Feb 3, 2011 3:46 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?




  Actually I think they should be responsible, but the decisions of which

bindings are made available should only be driven by the community. The

vendor knows their own product and what it is capable of better than anyone

else. All-Spec sells product for a profit as a way to operate but we are

also solutions providers on many facets. With that in mind I see parallels

here compared to a DB vendor offering a product that works as part of a

business solution. To that end, I would never spend time and money

researching and building web services or desktop applications for our

customers if they have no use for them. Why should the DB vendor spend time

and money building a language binding that no wants and is not readily

useable in an existing business solution? On the flip side, I also would not

leave it up to our customers to build their own inquiry app that scrapes our

web pages for stock and pricing. I would prefer to provide them with a

proper interface that fits their needs so we can finish the job and move on

to other tasks. Unfortunately, unless both sides are eager to meet in the

middle for the benefit of both then a symbiotic relationship will never

happen. In many cases the possibility of such a relationship is never

discussed or offered and therefore a lack of technological capability is

wrongfully perceived.



 

 As always, the problem is that projects like this, for the good

 of everyone, tend to fall on the few who often can afford it the

 least.





   We've both started building fires that smoldered and died due to a lack

of attention. At some point you have to move on when it becomes obvious that

the community is not interested. When you know your vision is right, though,

you should step back and change your scope of view on the project. The

approach you're taking may be the primary incentive for your involvement,

but the goal is just wrong. The opposite is also true as I've experienced.

The goal may be popular but the original approach to get there is too

convoluted or requires too many different skill sets to establish a

functioning starter project. 





 

 I'm going to use I and me below, but this applies to anyone

 in this market who does free development as a community service.

 There are a lot of us here.

 

 I create things like language bindings because I think it's cool

 and because it will help our market.  In the mean time there are

 people fearing for loss of their jobs because their platform of

 choice is too obscure and missing language bindings (for example)

 that are common everywhere else.  Demand/motivation and

 supply/desire in this market must learn to meet in the middle.

 





  You can't save the inept or the obstinate so don't expect solutions for

them to bring you income. Make your fun tools, during your free time,

because you want to. I know you do that and I do that too. I just don't

publish them anymore. :) FOSS is a great way to enhance technology, but only

if the end-users trust the developers and are willing to work hand-in-hand

with them to keep the project moving. How often is it that a tool or

solution is dropped in, plugged up, and then forgotten about for years? Most

of the solutions deployed in our community are rock-solid performers and

they don't need much attention once they're deployed. You can't expect just

anyone to pick up a FOSS project that's a year old, backed by 2 or 3

periodic coders and say I just gotta play with that on our 1000-user

system.





 I know if I solicit donations so that I can pay my mortgage while

 providing you (collectively) with something that will increase

 the value of your platform, I'll be shunned for trying to sell

 yet another product (what a concept *sigh*).  The public outcry

 will be deafening but it should be FREE, implying of course

 that someone else should do the work for free for everyone's

 benefit, like it is (supposedly) in the rest of the world.  With

 no motivation, this project that has been in the queue for about

 two years, will remain on the bottom of the 

Re: [U2] Universe Books?

2011-02-03 Thread DavidJMurray (mvdbs.com)


Since  no one else mentioned them, Rocket Software does have all the manuals
online as PDF's.

http://www.rocketsoftware.com/u2/resources/technical-resources

Cheers,

djm



-

Learn and Do
Excel and Share


http://mvdbs.com http://mvdbs.com 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Universe-Books--tp30840562p30840802.html
Sent from the U2 - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] What do you do with CallHTTP?

2011-02-03 Thread Wols Lists
On 02/02/11 18:57, Wols Lists wrote:
 The problem is, where do you put the layers. That's my beef with
 relational, the layer is in COMPLETELY the wrong place. This means a
 large chunk of information, which *belongs* in the database layer, *has*
 to be put into the business layer.
 
 Even the wording of relational theory makes this clear - data is stored
 as attributes. Attributes of what? Without an object to belong to, an
 attribute is meaningless, but you can't store an object in an RDBMS.

To expand on this - let's say you want to store a list. Where do you
store the sequence information? Bearing in mind that, as far as the real
world is concerned, this is metadata ... so it DOESN'T belong mixed up
in the same table as the data :-)

And how do you tell a relational database that data is mutually
co-dependent? That if one piece of data ceases to exist in the real
world, all these other pieces will also cease to exist at the same time?
Unless they're all single-valued, and fit in the same row, you can't!

Unfortunately, relational theory is based on the premise that data comes
already conveniently chopped up into rows and columns. Any information
(data?) that links those rows and columns can't fit in the database,
even if it belongs there.

And it's the PB business analyst who is left trying to square the circle ...

Cheers,
Wol
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


[U2] UV - date last installed

2011-02-03 Thread Schalk van Zyl
How can I determine the date of the last installation of UV (the date it 
was last loaded/reloaded).


Schalk van Zyl

Schalk van Zyl
GWK Beperk
Tel+2753 298 8231
Fax+2753 298 2445
Mobile


Hierdie e-pos en sy inhoud is onderhewig aan 'n regskennisgewing oor 
elektroniese pos wat gelees kan word by  
http://www.gwk.co.za/DisclaimerVrywaring.asp






.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users