Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version
Are you asking about Accuterm's web editor? I have been using it for several years now. We also use their gui environment for in house development of most of our monitoring tools. Ron -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 11:52 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version My specific request is that I wish to hear from a person who is actually using, as their main way of connecting to the database, the WEB based version of Accuterm. Not just someone who tried it for a day or something. But rather a person who is using it day to day for their normal work. -Original Message- From: Bill Haskett wphask...@advantos.net To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Mon, Dec 23, 2013 11:28 am Subject: Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version Were you talking about the version of AccuTerm that runs through a web browser? If so it's a nice product but the user still has to download and install AccuTerm, which works fine over the internet. I can certainly echo the sentiments regarding the quality of AccuTerm products and their wonderful support. If you'd like more information, can you be more specific about what you're looking for. I think your request was a little too general. Bill - Original Message - *From:* wjhon...@aol.com *To:* u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org *Date:* 12/23/2013 11:07 AM *Subject:* Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version No the original post was to see 1) if anyone is using this web version and 2) to get a testimonial FROM them. Period. That's all. Anything else you read into it, was not present. The purpose of customer testimonials is to get their own personal experience. That's for what I was looking. Solely. -Original Message- From: Bruce Decker bdec...@bluepinc.com To: u2-users u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Mon, Dec 23, 2013 10:36 am Subject: Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version Okay: Let me try it this way. I've known and worked with Pete for over 25 years. In ALL of that time, I've found that the quality of his products are first rate, he does not exaggerate claims (which is what I thought the original post was suggesting) and if there was an issue (rare) he is very responsive and quick to resolve the issue. I believe if Pete tells you something, you can take it to the bank. I think this is helpful information especially for those who may not know Pete and wonder if they can rely on information he is providing. I should have spelled it out instead of being snarky. My apologies. -BD On 12/23/2013 11:22 AM, Wjhonson wrote: Bruce if you don't like this thread, you don't have to respond. Please let those of us who want to know these answers discuss it. -Original Message- From: Bruce Decker bdec...@bluepinc.com To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Mon, Dec 23, 2013 10:19 am Subject: Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version Exactly what he means. -BD On 12/23/2013 11:13 AM, Dave Laansma wrote: Please elaborate. What exactly does Pete say. Sincerely, David Laansma Hubbard Supply Co. Direct: 810-342-7143 Office: 810-234-8681 Fax: 810-234-6142 www.hubbardsupply.com Delivering Products, Services and Innovative Solutions -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Decker Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 12:58 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version If Pete says it, I believe it. -BD On 12/23/2013 10:52 AM, Wjhonson wrote: We are using the Accuterm application to telnet into Universe 11 I've toyed with the idea of using the Accuterm browser version, does anyone here use that ? I just wonder what are the advantages or disadvantages of that. I know what Pete says, I want to hear from a customer though. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version
Gotcha. That we have not had the pleasure of using. Ron -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Will Johnson Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 12:09 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version No there is a web based version of Accuterm. Not the Editor. The telnet if you will, that lets you run the data entry screens, etc. -Original Message- From: Bertrand, Ron [via U2 (UniVerse UniData)] [via U2 (UniVerse UniData)] ml-node+s1073795n42397...@n5.nabble.com To: Will Johnson wjhon...@aol.com Sent: Mon, Dec 23, 2013 12:00 pm Subject: Re: Accuterm the Web version Are you asking about Accuterm's web editor? I have been using it for several years now. We also use their gui environment for in house development of most of our monitoring tools. Ron -Original Message- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Wjhonson Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 11:52 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version My specific request is that I wish to hear from a person who is actually using, as their main way of connecting to the database, the WEB based version of Accuterm. Not just someone who tried it for a day or something. But rather a person who is using it day to day for their normal work. -Original Message- From: Bill Haskett [hidden email] To: U2 Users List [hidden email] Sent: Mon, Dec 23, 2013 11:28 am Subject: Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version Were you talking about the version of AccuTerm that runs through a web browser? If so it's a nice product but the user still has to download and install AccuTerm, which works fine over the internet. I can certainly echo the sentiments regarding the quality of AccuTerm products and their wonderful support. If you'd like more information, can you be more specific about what you're looking for. I think your request was a little too general. Bill - Original Message - *From:* [hidden email] *To:* [hidden email] *Date:* 12/23/2013 11:07 AM *Subject:* Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version No the original post was to see 1) if anyone is using this web version and 2) to get a testimonial FROM them. Period. That's all. Anything else you read into it, was not present. The purpose of customer testimonials is to get their own personal experience. That's for what I was looking. Solely. -Original Message- From: Bruce Decker [hidden email] To: u2-users [hidden email] Sent: Mon, Dec 23, 2013 10:36 am Subject: Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version Okay: Let me try it this way. I've known and worked with Pete for over 25 years. In ALL of that time, I've found that the quality of his products are first rate, he does not exaggerate claims (which is what I thought the original post was suggesting) and if there was an issue (rare) he is very responsive and quick to resolve the issue. I believe if Pete tells you something, you can take it to the bank. I think this is helpful information especially for those who may not know Pete and wonder if they can rely on information he is providing. I should have spelled it out instead of being snarky. My apologies. -BD On 12/23/2013 11:22 AM, Wjhonson wrote: Bruce if you don't like this thread, you don't have to respond. Please let those of us who want to know these answers discuss it. -Original Message- From: Bruce Decker [hidden email] To: U2 Users List [hidden email] Sent: Mon, Dec 23, 2013 10:19 am Subject: Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version Exactly what he means. -BD On 12/23/2013 11:13 AM, Dave Laansma wrote: Please elaborate. What exactly does Pete say. Sincerely, David Laansma Hubbard Supply Co. Direct: 810-342-7143 Office: 810-234-8681 Fax: 810-234-6142 www.hubbardsupply.com Delivering Products, Services and Innovative Solutions -Original Message- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Bruce Decker Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 12:58 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Accuterm the Web version If Pete says it, I believe it. -BD On 12/23/2013 10:52 AM, Wjhonson wrote: We are using the Accuterm application to telnet into Universe 11 I've toyed with the idea of using the Accuterm browser version, does anyone here use that ? I just wonder what are the advantages or disadvantages of that. I know what Pete says, I want to hear from a customer though. ___ U2-Users mailing list [hidden email] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list [hidden email] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list [hidden email] http://listserver.u2ug.org
[U2] accuterm WED issue
Interesting issue popped up a couple of days ago with Accuterms WED. We have a program calling a subroutine that wraps to the next line: CALL GETENTRY.TO( CMDDATA, CMMND, '30L', '_', '0X', CMDHELP, 01, 22, CMDPROMPT, 'QEGIA', 59 ) When I formatted the program in WED it added a space after the 01 on the next line. At least I assume it's a space because the Universe editor does not show any other characters with an ^. This caused me to be blown out of universe - still not sure why yet- with a segmentation fault. CALL GETENTRY.TO(CMDDATA,CMMND,'30L', '_', '0X',CMDHELP, 01 ,22,CMDPROMPT,'QEGIA',59) Removed the space and everything works fine. Curious if anybody has seen this activity or had the same thing happen to them? Thanks Ron Bertrand | ANALYST,AP SYS 3 ISD, Group Health Cooperative 206-901-4519 bertran...@ghc.org GHC Confidentiality Statement This message and any attached files might contain confidential information protected by federal and state law. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entities originally named as addressees. The improper disclosure of such information may be subject to civil or criminal penalties. If this message reached you in error, please contact the sender and destroy this message. Disclosing, copying, forwarding, or distributing the information by unauthorized individuals or entities is strictly prohibited by law. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] accuterm WED issue
Need to spend some time trying to figure out just what is happening in universe so Rocket has something to work with. Noticed it while doing a diff, fixed it and problem gone. Adding the space is definitely something I need to get with assent on. Thanks Ron -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 3:39 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] accuterm WED issue AccuTerm adding a space into code might be an issue to report to supp...@asent.com. I think the segfault should be addressed with Rocket Support. HTH T From: Bertrand, Ron Interesting issue popped up a couple of days ago with Accuterms WED. We have a program calling a subroutine that wraps to the next line: CALL GETENTRY.TO( CMDDATA, CMMND, '30L', '_', '0X', CMDHELP, 01, 22, CMDPROMPT, 'QEGIA', 59 ) When I formatted the program in WED it added a space after the 01 on the next line. At least I assume it's a space because the Universe editor does not show any other characters with an ^. This caused me to be blown out of universe - still not sure why yet- with a segmentation fault. CALL GETENTRY.TO(CMDDATA,CMMND,'30L', '_', '0X',CMDHELP, 01 ,22,CMDPROMPT,'QEGIA',59) Removed the space and everything works fine. Curious if anybody has seen this activity or had the same thing happen to them? ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users GHC Confidentiality Statement This message and any attached files might contain confidential information protected by federal and state law. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entities originally named as addressees. The improper disclosure of such information may be subject to civil or criminal penalties. If this message reached you in error, please contact the sender and destroy this message. Disclosing, copying, forwarding, or distributing the information by unauthorized individuals or entities is strictly prohibited by law. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] [UV] Install as root vs uvadm
We had multiple permission problems when we installed universe 11.3 as uvadm. Had to emergency re-install as root. Ron Bertrand | ANALYST,AP SYS 3 ISD, Group Health Cooperative PHONE 206-901-4519 CELL 206-605-9027 E-MAIL bertran...@ghc.org -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Perry Taylor Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 11:12 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] [UV] Install as root vs uvadm I'm getting ready to install UniVerse on a new server and am questioning my past decision to install as uvadm rather than root. I'm not sure that installing as uvadm has really been of any benefit. Anyone want to comment on your experiences using uvadm vs root? Thanks. Perry Perry Taylor Senior MV Architect ZirMed 888 West Market Street, Suite 400 Louisville, KY 40202 www.zirmed.comhttp://www.zirmed.com/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. ZirMed, Inc. has strict policies regarding the content of e-mail communications, specifically Protected Health Information, any communications containing such material will be returned to the originating party with such advisement noted. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users GHC Confidentiality Statement This message and any attached files might contain confidential information protected by federal and state law. The information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entities originally named as addressees. The improper disclosure of such information may be subject to civil or criminal penalties. If this message reached you in error, please contact the sender and destroy this message. Disclosing, copying, forwarding, or distributing the information by unauthorized individuals or entities is strictly prohibited by law. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
[U2] Common UNIX Printing System
Hey all - is anybody using CUPS with universe? Ron Bertrand Analyst,AP SYS 3 ISD/LIS/AMS Group Health Coop 206-901-4519 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] SSL on Universe
I am working on implementing sockets using SSL on Universe. I am currently confused on the sequence of events required in order to open the socket. This is what I have so far but I suspect I am missing pieces. ERR = createSecurityContext(SOCKETCONTEXT,VERSION) IF NOT(ERR) THEN INIT = initSecureServerSocket(SOCKETHOST,SOCKETPORT,BLOCKMODE,SOCKETHANDLE,SOCKETCON TEXT) END Any help would be greatly appreciated Ron Bertrand Analyst,AP SYS 3 ISD/LIS/AMS Group Health Coop 206-901-4519 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Backup Question
It suspends writes to ALL universe files. The background jobs are still running but any file updates will wait until you turn suspend off. I track the suspend ON/Off status in a unix directory just for that reason. Ron Bertrand Analyst,AP SYS 3 ISD/LIS Group Health Coop 206-901-4519 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chandrika Padaki Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:24 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Backup Question If we did a SUSPEND.FILES.ON, does it just suspend the updates and not mess with any jobs / users logged into the system? If so, that might work, since we have a third party script to backup to disk right now. Currently brings down the database though, doing that causes problems with other batch processes setup. Thanks, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hona, David S Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:44 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Backup Question uvbackup is the official database backup/restore utility. Hardly anybody uses it though, it's too slow and not very flexible for some. It has the advantage of performing internal data (structure) file integrity checking, as part of the backup and internally tagging the files as backed-up. You can use a third-party utility and invoke the TCL command SUSPEND.FILES ON to pause updates whilst you do an online backup. Or break your disk mirror, back that up instead. Other options to look at are UV Data Replication to backup system with UV installed/licensed to mirror your production environment. Not a cheap option in most cases. Whatever you use, you need to ensure that absolutely no updates are happening to any of the UniVerse files. And of course you're using a backup utility which can backup open files on the operating system you're hosting on. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chandrika Padaki Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 5:25 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Backup Question Our company has a Universe System. We are trying to automate the backup process without bringing the system down every night. Is there an Online Backup Utility available? If so what is it and do any of you have a sample script I could look at? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] A few simple questions
Either you su to root, login as root or (if setup) do a sudo uv to enter universe as root and then run the master off. I built a program to do the sudo piece for me. Among other things! This the GOSUB that does the work. LOGOFF.MSG = '' ERR.MSG = '' VOC.REC = '' VOC.ID = 'TEMP.LOGOFF.USER' VOC.REC1 = 'PA' IF (SELECTED.USER.ID) THEN VOC.REC2 = UNLOCK USER :SELECTED.APP.ID: ALL VOC.REC3 = MASTER OFF :SELECTED.APP.ID WRITE VOC.REC ON VOC.FILE,VOC.ID THEN UV.CONTROL.CMDD = sudo -u root /usr/ibm/uv/bin/uv TEMP.LOGOFF.USER EXECUTE UTL1SHELL :UV.CONTROL.CMDD CAPTURING LOGOFF.MSG END ELSE ERR.MSG = 'Unable to create Master off voc pointer' END END ELSE ERR.MSG = 'No user selected' END IF (ERR.MSG) THEN GOSUB DISPLAY.ERROR.MSG END Ron Bertrand Group Health ISD/Lab -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Banker Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 1:37 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] A few simple questions When your Universe was installed more than likely the installer picked root as the administrator. Jerry Banker Sr Programmer Analyst Affiliated Acceptance Corp Sunrise Beach, MO 1-800-233-8483 www.affiliated.org -Original Message- From: Oaks, Harold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 3:15 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] A few simple questions I am a fairly new Universe user. We are running on hpux 10.2 I have several questions, but only one here- I know the MASTER OFF command can be used to log out a user, i.e. MASTER OFF 132 logs off user 132. The on-line help says one must be a Universe Administrator to run this command, and be in the home account for Universe. However, in ...ibm/uv/bin the file 'master' which is executed by this command has owner root and permissions are set to rwx--. In other words, only root can execute this command on our system and logging in as uvadm is not good enough. Is this typical for you Universe users? Or did you change the permissions on this executable? Is there some other way uvadm can log out users? Harold D. Oaks Sr. Analyst/Programmer Office of the Budget and Information Systems Clark County, Washington ph: (360) 397-6121 x4132 fax: (360) 397-2342 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Over-coming EDitor shortcomings
Do not know about Unidata but you can get to any unix directory/file with pointers in Universe. Then you can use either ED or WED and so on. I have to admit to being spoiled by accuterms WED. Ron Bertrand Group Health LIS/ISD From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 10/12/2007 9:30 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Over-coming EDitor shortcomings So, what good is that for those of us who live on Unix/Linux and don't have the option of running Accuterm? I use gvim, which has pretty good syntax highlighting, copy/move/find-replace, etc. I prefer it to ED. I've never used AE. I guess it's time to do some experimenting with other technologies. OH, and just for fun, consider this: I write my HTML code with gvim or vim, period... Old School or just stubborn? hmmm. Karl quote who=MAJ Programming Shameless plug for Accuterm If you haven't used WED, their Windows EDitor, you're missing a ton of helpful editor stuff. All of the shortcuts and command-line tricks pale by comparison. Funny, how everybody talks about the latest XYZ alphabetic technologies yet still use an editor barely better than vi or EDLIN. And don't let your years of experience sway you to protecting that fingertip editor. I've been using the regular EDIT, AE or vi coming up on 30 years and WED blows them all away. (this ain't a contest) WED alone without their graphical developer tools (GED) or their powerful emulator is worth the price. Accuterm is truly one of the best bargains in the MV world. /Shameless plug for Accuterm - Original Message - From: Jerry Banker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:21 AM Subject: RE: [U2] Over-coming EDitor shortcomings I created a pre-store, a few years back, that does something similar thing in the regular editor. I think we were still on UV 7.4 at the time. ED ED FIB 6 lines long. : P 0001: EPre-stored Command saved at 16:50:53 24 JUN 1998 0002: FORMAT 0003: SAVE 0004: XEQ DECATALOG @FILE @ID 0005: XEQ BASIC @FILE @ID 0006: XEQ CATALOG @FILE @ID Bottom at line 6. So when in the regular editor all you have to do is type in: .X FIB Which is a few more key strokes but less than all of the commands. I didn't want to do the run because most of the development at the time was done on a live system. But you could add: XEQ @FILE @ID or XEQ @ID after the last line and save it as FIBR to do as you are doing. Jerry -Original Message- From: Baker Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 8:40 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Over-coming EDitor shortcomings /snip FIX 0001 PA 0002 FORMAT BP I2,Enter BP item 0003 ED BP I2,Enter BP item 0004 HUSH ON 0005 DELETE BP.O I2,Enter BP item 0006 HUSH OFF 0007 BASIC BP I2,Enter BP item My 2 bits on this topic. Karl snip\ Which is why I like the AE [alternate] editor. Once you've executed a format command in your logon session, you simply type 'FOR' at any time the rest of the day, in any edit session, to format with the same parameters. FOR -I3 -M3 [Indention of 3, margin of 3] BTW, If you're chasing a pesky bug that's hidden in a 14 tier nested LOOP,IF,CASE,Whatever then use this: 'FOR -TRACE' it will put pipes in for you where we used to draw lines with our ruler to trace the logical flow. Then when your done and want to compile: 'FIBR' will file it, compile it, and run it [don't get to habitual with the 'R' if your in a sub]. The AE invoked compiler removes the old source when it starts, that way if the compile produces no object, it doesn't run the old object code. At least this is the behavior on UV 10 or higher. 356: 357:IF HOLD # '' AND NOT(ALARM) THEN *--: FOR -I3 -M3 Margin=3, Indentation=3, -incase !! *--: FOR Margin=3, Indentation=3, -incase !! *--: FIB Filed DOE.WRITE.SUB.F1675 in file BHB. Compiling: Source = '/system1/dev.programs/BHB/DOE.WRITE.SUB.F1675', Object = '/system1/dev.programs/BHB.O/DOE.WRITE.SUB.F1675' *** 000671 Compilation Complete. Of course, you could stack the FORmat command and the FIBR command into a saved prestore that you recall when you begin your edit session, but that's another subject. FWIW, -Baker --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- Karl Pearson Director of I.T. ATS Industrial Supply, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.atsindustrial.com http://www.atsindustrial.com/ 800-789-9300 x29 Local: 801-978-4429
RE: [U2] UniVerse and Shadow copy on Windows 2003
Universe 10.2.2 on Solaris 10 ASSIGN 1 TO SYSTEM(43) to suspend And 0 to un-suspend Or UVSUSPEND.FILES ON/OFF (APP.PROGS/UVSUSPEND.B) Ron Bertrand ISD/LIS Group Health 206-901-4519 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 2:43 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UniVerse and Shadow copy on Windows 2003 I have transaction processing in the application, but I don't believe that Universe has the dbpause and dresume options. Regards David Jordan --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniVerse and Shadow copy on Windows 2003
1) If you want to do any error tracking or suspend/unsuspend verification flags you have to do it at the unix level - see #2!! I write status flags out to the backup dir for the process. 2) We are running the process from from a backup cron (with root access) and I found with that you need an account with a login voc that does not run anything that writes to Universe files. Pretty obvious once you do it!!! The backup process is doing a cd //bkup and then /usr/ibm/uv/bin/uv SUSPEND.ON, breaking a mirror and then a SUSPEND.OFFwith a resync later. So far we average 4 seconds suspended. Ron From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Jordan Sent: Mon 9/17/2007 5:00 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UniVerse and Shadow copy on Windows 2003 Hi Ron Thanks for that. Are you aware of any issues I need to look out using this? Regards David Jordan Universe 10.2.2 on Solaris 10 ASSIGN 1 TO SYSTEM(43) to suspend And 0 to un-suspend Or UVSUSPEND.FILES ON/OFF (APP.PROGS/UVSUSPEND.B) Ron Bertrand --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Is there a dbpause for UniVerse?
Try Suspend on ASSIGN 1 TO SYSTEM(43) Suspend off ASSIGN 0 TO SYSTEM(43) Solaris 5.9 universe 10.1 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Wolverton Sent: Fri 2/9/2007 3:29 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UV] Is there a dbpause for UniVerse? We are working with a client installing a SAN. Our UniData database is up and running on SAN - quite peppy. We are using dbpause/dbresume to do snapshots every 30 minutes on the database. Less than 10 seconds to generate the snapshot! UniData doesn't even 'know' that the files are not attached to the local D drives any longer - that D drive is now an iSCSI attachment to a SAN drive across a gigibit connection. So the move to the SAN was transparent - not even a VOC pointer had to be touched. VERY cool. Next database up is the UniVerse machine's files. But there is no 'dbpause' in UniVerse (that I can find) -- how do we accomplish the same thing in UniVerse we do in UniData with dbpause/dbresume - that is, stop/pause writes to the database (albeit in a potentially incomplete state) so that we can snapshot the disk and then resume the writes? Thanks for any hints here! David Wolverton --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse
Solaris 8 Universe 10.0.3 We had the same problem twice last month. We also decided that the uvdlockd.log entries were a red herring. So far it has not happened again. We were no where near our maximum users limit but it acted like it was hitting that limit. If somebody logged off (or just out of Universe) then the next person waiting to login to Universe was able to get in. Ron Bertrand ISD/LIS Group Health Coop -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark F. Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:29 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse Solaris 8, UV 10.0.8 ... A sister site had a strange error today. Users could successfully login to unix, but once the login script performed an exec uv the user would hang, with no response. Using ps -aef showed uv as their last command. Users all ready on were OK. The only apparent errors were in uvdlockd.log (numerous iterations): Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - Failure in LK_cleanup_pshm Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - DeadLock Daemon started in Dead Process Cleanup Mode by pid (13100) Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - ** Cleanup being performed for UserSig(74) I thought it might have been that the login semaphore was locked, but every time they checked it using SEMAPHORE.STATUS it appeared to be in a zero state. The situation may have resolved itself, or the half-panicked executions of uvlictool, UNLOCK LOGINLOCK SEMAPHORE, and HELP ME NOW, plus banging on the console with a half eaten bananna may have resolved it. I'm thinking the errors in the uvdlockd.log are either a red herring or symptoms, not the cause. Other than the login sempahore, what could cause the a user to experience these symptoms? Any random thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks in advance, Mark Hennessey --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse
We did - it said we were fine so we did not do a clean. Is a clean still indicated if no problems are being reported? Ron Bertrand ISD/LIS Group Health Coop -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:36 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse Check you licenses with the uvlictool. There is an option to clean licenses. Sometimes a forced logout or fatal issue may not drop the license even though the user is no longer connected. The uvlictool cleans this up Regards David Jordan Managing Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bertrand, Ron Sent: Wednesday, 21 June 2006 7:57 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse Solaris 8 Universe 10.0.3 We had the same problem twice last month. We also decided that the uvdlockd.log entries were a red herring. So far it has not happened again. We were no where near our maximum users limit but it acted like it was hitting that limit. If somebody logged off (or just out of Universe) then the next person waiting to login to Universe was able to get in. Ron Bertrand ISD/LIS Group Health Coop -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark F. Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:29 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse Solaris 8, UV 10.0.8 ... A sister site had a strange error today. Users could successfully login to unix, but once the login script performed an exec uv the user would hang, with no response. Using ps -aef showed uv as their last command. Users all ready on were OK. The only apparent errors were in uvdlockd.log (numerous iterations): Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - Failure in LK_cleanup_pshm Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - DeadLock Daemon started in Dead Process Cleanup Mode by pid (13100) Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - ** Cleanup being performed for UserSig(74) I thought it might have been that the login semaphore was locked, but every time they checked it using SEMAPHORE.STATUS it appeared to be in a zero state. The situation may have resolved itself, or the half-panicked executions of uvlictool, UNLOCK LOGINLOCK SEMAPHORE, and HELP ME NOW, plus banging on the console with a half eaten bananna may have resolved it. I'm thinking the errors in the uvdlockd.log are either a red herring or symptoms, not the cause. Other than the login sempahore, what could cause the a user to experience these symptoms? Any random thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks in advance, Mark Hennessey --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Solaris Compatiblity?
Running Universe Ver 10.0.3 on SunOS 5.8. Works just fine! Ron Bertrand ISD/LIS Group Health Coop 206-901-4519 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 10:06 AM To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org' Subject: [U2] [UV] Solaris Compatiblity? I am considering Sun's Solaris to run a hot-spare-backup-x86 server. Our main box is HP-Ux. Does UniVerse run on Solaris? I have not yet asked IBM about licensing issues. --Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] U2/UV Enhanced reporting tools
Here is a link to mits in case you don't already have it. http://www.mitsonline.com/ Ron Bertrand ISD/LIS Group Health Coop 206-901-4519 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark F. Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 9:31 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] U2/UV Enhanced reporting tools I've been tasked to try to find a solution to some of our reporting issues. One way would be to get some of our power users additional training in UniVerse/Retrieve, etc. I'm thinking a better (or maybe just different) approach might be to get something like MITS, Monarch or Crystal Reports. Is anyone working with these products in a UniVerse environment? If so, how would you rate them? (Especially on initial cost and installation/configuration issues). I'd be particularly interested in hearing from anyone who's worked with all three, or knows of other products. Any help/advice/caveats would be greatly appreciated. Mark Hennessey State of Connecticut DSS/MIS Child Support Systems Voice: 860-424-5261 Fax: 860-424-4956 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
