[UV] uvconfig parameters - T30FILE, MFILES, etc.
UV 10.0.17, Windows 2003 The other day I had occasion to increase the value of the T30FILE parameter from the default of 200 (to 300) for the first time in the several years I've been using Universe. Unfortunately, the documentation is not very clear (at least to me) regarding interdependencies between the various parameters in uvconfig. So far, the change I made don't seem to have had any negative effect, but I'm wondering if something is waiting in the weeds getting ready to bite me? Are there any other parameters I need to adjust when I change T30FILE? In particular, do I need to increase MFILES correspondingly? TIA for any advice. Thanks Clif. David Scoggins IT Analyst CornerStone Propane mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: OT RE: We need a web based Forum!
> -Original Message- > From: Wendy Smoak > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 8:33 AM > To: U2 Users Discussion List > Subject: OT RE: We need a web based Forum! > > > I would whole-heartedly agree with this. BUT I have never > > seen such an animal in action myself. I think it's mythical. > > Will > > It is not mythical, one of the forums I use works exactly like that. > You do have to be set up as a user and "subscribe" to the forums you > want to read. But after that, emails show up on the forum, > and anything posted to the forum goes out via email. > A quick look says that the forum software is... > O'Reilly WebBoard 4.20.82 (c)1995-2000 Duke Engineering/O'Reilly & > Associates, Inc. > WebBoard is a trademark of O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. Nice. http://webboard.oreilly.com/products/webboard/index.cfm However, it looks like O'Reilly sold it to another company in '01, and the standard edition is $3995, which - I'm guessing - is a bit out of the price range. It's a shame there doesn't seem to be a free (as in beer AND in speech) alternative that supports these features. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
> Will, > > > Joe I think Zero is an exagerration. > > This is NOT an Exaggeration, these are TEST Results from well > maintained > SQL Tables. So you're claiming that the query literally takes ZERO time - or in other words that MS SQL Server is INFINITELY fast in performing this particular query? In fact, I don't believe that's what you're claiming, but your hyperbole is annoying, as is your response to attempts to gently bring you back down to earth. > SQL: > select count(*) from TableName > Or > select count(@IdentityField) from TableName (This is Faster than the > above) So both queries take zero time, but nevertheless one is faster than the other? Hmmm... > The above 2 ran against MS-SQLServer instant. > > Here is the code, if you would like to test. > declare @stime dateTime; > set @stime = getDate(); > select count(*) from CustomerMaster > print dateDiff("ms",@stime,getDate()) Which proves what exactly - that MS SQL Server can fetch a value from a table header in an elapsed time that is less than the resolution of your timer? Big whoop. Joe, I have to say I feel sorry for the poor UV programmers who have to work with you. Your whole rant and negative opinion of Universe seems to have been occasioned by the UV programmers forcing you to give them a comma-delimited flat file rather than an XML file for import into UV. I suspect they were perfectly capable of dealing with any data format you were capable of providing, but made you give it to them in something that was easy for them to handle because THEY JUST PLAIN DON'T LIKE YOU! I don't even know you, the only thing I know about you is what you have revealed about yourself in your posts to this list, and you already annoy the fsck out of me! I can only imagine, and shudder in horror, at what it must be like to actually have to deal with you on a daily basis. Sigh. I given in to the temptation. Must remind myself: Please don't feed the trolls. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: The lists are closing - REPRIEVE
Just let me be the first to say - YEA!!! Thanks for the last minute reprieve, Gover... er, Clif. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 4:43 PM > To: U2 Users Discussion List > Subject: RE: The lists are closing - REPRIEVE > I will keep the lists running as they are through the end of > the month of April. I want to give U2UG and any other parties > interesting in continuing this more time to figure out if/how/when. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UV - is there a coldstart equivalent
> -Original Message- > From: Troy Buss (Logitek Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: UV - is there a coldstart equivalent > > In D3 there is a coldstart process that runs when the database is started > which is useful from an applications stand point by clearing status files, > starting application phantoms and general cleanup. On unix, you could always hook into the uv.rc script. I don't have an example to look at right now, but just before the end of the startup stanza you could add a line something like: exec /usr/local/my.coldstart.sh where my.coldstart.sh is a custom script that can do all the things you mention. The exact paths and filename will of course vary by system and personal preference. I'm not sure what the equivalent would be for Windows. David Scoggins IT Analyst CornerStone Propane mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Using the Telnet via SSL feature on wIntegrate and uniVerse 1 0.1
Hmm... interesting. Does anyone know if this works with Dynamic Connect instead of wIntegrate? I may have to try this when I get a few spare minutes to play with it. Re Ian Foster's original question - if you're wedded to SSL for some reason you may want to take a look at stunnel (www.stunnel.org). It looks like it would be a lot more work to set up than SSH via Putty though. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 9:01 AM > To: U2 Users Discussion List > Subject: Re: Using the Telnet via SSL feature on wIntegrate > and uniVerse 10.1 > > At 06:27 AM 2/11/2004, you wrote: > >Has anyone had any success setting up wIntegrate 5.1 to connect to a > >uniVerse 10.1 server using the Telnet via SSL feature. > > I have not done it but here is a write up IBM put out in a > newsletter on how to make a SSH tunnel. I think this is what > you were looking for as opposed to SSL. > > > Using SSH security with wIntegrate > > DESCRIPTION: > > *Secure Shell (SSH), sometimes known as Secure Socket Shell, > is a Unix-based command interface and protocol for securely > getting access to a remote computer. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users