Re: [Ubnt_users] AF24 rf-link drops
Contact ubnt support and Chuck. I have seen this before. Far side radio went bad. On January 10, 2015 2:01:03 PM AKST, Kevin Lamothe klamo...@vianet.ca wrote: Yes, the ground lug is connected. When the event happens I can log into the radio, it just shows no link and looks like it's scanning. It stays like that until a power cycle is done. All I see is this in the log file [272287.89] FATAL ERROR currhead = 0x033, currtail = 0x029 [272287.89] FATAL ERROR lastlength = 100 [272287.89] FATAL ERROR lasthead = 0x029, lasttail = 0x028 [274298.02] FATAL ERROR in get_data(vc 0x1b): Bad packet size 1536 [274298.02] FATAL ERROR currhead = 0x7ba, currtail = 0x7b0 [274298.02] FATAL ERROR lastlength = 100 [274298.02] FATAL ERROR lasthead = 0x7b0, lasttail = 0x7af [276332.72] FATAL ERROR in get_data(vc 0x1b): Bad packet size 1536 [276332.72] FATAL ERROR currhead = 0xf57, currtail = 0xf4d [276332.72] FATAL ERROR lastlength = 100 [276332.72] FATAL ERROR lasthead = 0xf4d, lasttail = 0xf4c [278370.50] FATAL ERROR in get_data(vc 0x1b): Bad packet size 1536 [278370.50] FATAL ERROR currhead = 0x6fe, currtail = 0x6f4 [278370.50] FATAL ERROR lastlength = 100 [278370.50] FATAL ERROR lasthead = 0x6f4, lasttail = 0x6f3 On 1/10/2015 12:09 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote: That was my next question. Although I've never seen an issue from not connecting it. So you can get into the web UI via Ethernet but the RF shuts down? On Jan 10, 2015, at 12:06, Nate Burke n...@blastcomm.com wrote: Do you have the Ground lug on the radio connected? On 1/10/2015 11:02 AM, Kevin Lamothe wrote: It's grounded to the shack's grounding system. There used to be a major telecom company that used to be on this tower, they did everything up to spec. Plus we verified the grounding system. The previous run up to the AF was just a jell filled cable, we thought it might be a ESD problem. Hence why we changed it. On 1/10/2015 11:55 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote: What is the ESD cable grounded to at the bottom? On Jan 10, 2015, at 11:49, Kevin Lamotheklamo...@vianet.ca wrote: We've been having problems with AF24 in winter, mostly with high winds and blowing snow. Other then that, the unit runs fine the rest of the year. I'm starting to think it's a static discharge problem. The RF side completely drops and a power cycle is required to bring it back online. This unit has already been RMA'd and ethernet run replaced, yes it's a ESD cable. There's about 8 other devices on this tower that don't have this problem. Has anyone seen anything like this before? or know a way to help with the static build up problems? ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Station connected and working but management UI won't respond
Firmware versions? 5.5.4 had some bad memory leaks. 5.5.6 had a moderate memleak with SNMP enabled On January 9, 2015 7:21:23 AM AKST, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: I have seen this many times but I am wondering if anyone knows the cause or a remote solution. I am going to migrate an AP from 10mhz to 20mhz channel width. Before I do so I am making sure I can reach all associated radios so that I can migrate them as well of course. I have 2 different customers on this AP that are connected and online but the radio just will not respond via the web interface. One of them will respond via SSH but the other won't. I tried the reboot command on the one that did respond but any command I try to run just stalls the session. I call the two customers and of course neither is around to power cycle the units. Is there a known cause for this or a way to snap them out of their daze remotely? -Ty ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket5ac PTMP w/AirPrism availability
I'm going to go ahead and ask this I guess... Can you quantify the advantages of the dedicated ptp product for us? On January 8, 2015 8:45:49 AM AKST, Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com wrote: There are advantages to each...The filters and channel widths are also unique (PTP having larger channel widths available). airPrism is customized for each. On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote: Okay. So now if there's no cost difference between PTP and PTMP AirPrisms, what advantages are there to the PTP? Surely there must be some to have the ability to connect more than one client removed. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- *From: *Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Thursday, January 8, 2015 11:14:03 AM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket5ac PTMP w/AirPrism availability Between PTP and PTMP with airPrism? They will be same price... On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote: How much of a price difference or is there any? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- *From: *Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Thursday, January 8, 2015 10:55:10 AM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket5ac PTMP w/AirPrism availability The PTP version will always be just PTP (at least as it currently stands). They have different hardware than the PTMP version (not yet announced). We are planning to start shipping PTMP AirPrism version this month to distributors. Thanks, Ben On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Tom Fadgen tfad...@coastinet.com wrote: I am hoping just like the non-prizm 5ac-lite's which originally came out as PTP only, a firmware release will open up PTMP. Tom Fadgen coastinet.com On Thursday 08/01/2015 at 7:52 am, Jeremy Grip wrote: Not seeing this available yet from the usual suspects. Can we assume the price will look like the PTP version? Jeremy Grip North Branch Networks,LLC ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] RocketM365 firmware 5.5.10
Most of our network is on 5.5.10 after testing it for months. My house is even on 5.5.10. With 3 kids and 4 gamers in my house I'd know if there was latency issues. It's fine. On January 6, 2015 10:10:48 PM AKST, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting enough, I thought 5.5.10 was blessed by general conscientious but I've been fighting latency issues since I upgraded a few weeks ago. Have tried everything else but downgrading the firmware. Guess whats next! Anyone else? On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Chris Soiles csoi...@riocities.net wrote: I updated this customers radio on Thursday to 5.5.10 They called last night and said its been acting wierd for a few days I install 5.5.8 and it improves Ping times in 1200s down to 30 Bandwidth not exceeding 1Mb, instantly spikes to 3Mb Anyone else see wierd things with 5.5.10? [image: image1.PNG] Sent from my iPad Chris Soiles Owner Rio Cities csoi...@riocities.net 505-966-6389 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- -RickG KyWiFi ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams
Don't understand how we can get them via streakwave and double radius without issue but everybody else is saying there is a shortage and the sky is falling.. Can you shed some light on why? On January 5, 2015 8:36:51 AM AKST, Eva Ernest-Vargyas e...@balticnetworks.com wrote: To those still interested in NanoBridges M5-25, we just received a small quantity back into stock. We are taking orders and shipping today. http://www.balticnetworks.com/nanobridge-5ghz-25dbi-dual-pol-nb-5g25-1243.html [logo] Eva Ernest Vargyas, CPA - Director of Finance and Operations 2200 Ogden Ave. - Suite 240 - Lisle, IL 60532 USA | www.balticnetworks.comhttp://www.balticnetworks.com/ (toll free) 888-929-3610 Ext. 22 | (international) 630-929-3610 Ext. 22 | (fax) 630-352-2005 [certified] http://www.balticnetworks.com/training-courses.html [exaltLogo] http://www.balticnetworks.com/manufacturers/exalt.html [siklu] http://www.balticnetworks.com/manufacturers/siklu.html [cloudGate] http://www.balticnetworks.com/manufacturers/option.html [http://www.balticnetworks.com/images/saf.png] http://www.balticnetworks.com/manufacturers/saf.html From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Sam Tetherow Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:43 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams I would think it would not be that hard to get rid of them even when the nanobeam DFS comes out. There will surely be a shortage of nanobeams at some point in the near future and they will go quick. On 12/17/2014 11:20 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote: I have fifty 22dbi nanobridges on the way from Pasadena Networks and my rep (Kate) at Double Radius said she could have filled that order too. Seems the supply line is pretty rich right now while the third tier like Mowinet is a little gun shy about ordering them, with the big unknown about how much longer until DFS is approved you can understand the uncertainty. Forbes On 12/16/2014 5:42 AM, ralph wrote: We were told by one of these masters that they were discontinued (5 GHz Nanobridge). Then that they got UBNT to make a special run and they would have some to sell and that we should pre-order. We did and got a case to get us by until the imminent Nanobeam FCC approval. Needless to say, that has never happened. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 6:01 PM To: 'Ubiquiti Users Group' Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams Ben I was also told by 4 masters like double radius,streakwave,scansource,micro saying that they cant get them anymore and being replaced by nanobeams. Tim From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Ghering Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 4:59 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams Steve, is our rep. But there is never any stock listed and when we call they just sold out On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.commailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com wrote: Hi Ryan - Who is your rep from Streakwave? They have received regular shipments and pulled from our US stock, so getting them should not be a problem. Thanks, Ben On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.commailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com wrote: Ryan. So do I and I have not seen this shortage. On Dec 12, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Ryan Ghering rgher...@gmail.commailto:rgher...@gmail.com wrote: I havent been able to find any stock of nanobridges in a few months. We were forced into using other brands of gear because of this in some towers. Not happy And we primarily buy from baltic and streak On Friday, December 12, 2014, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.commailto:tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote: Latest estimate is still next year. Sounds like first quarter. -Ty On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Forbes Mercy wi...@wabroadband.commailto:wi...@wabroadband.com wrote: I admittedly don't keep up as I should on this list so I'm probably bringing something up that has been talked about a lot, sorry. I am out of NanoBridges and while I'd dearly like to move to NanoBeams because they are a much nicer radio, they are boat anchors without DFS capabilities. Why it's taken longer to get this certification is beyond me but before I buy another few hundred NanoBridges (when I am lucky enough to find a supplier that still carries them) I'd like to know if the certification is any closer? Thanks, Forbes Mercy Washington Broadband, Inc. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.orgmailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Ryan Ghering Network Operations - Plains.Nethttp://Plains.Net Office: 970-848-0475tel:970-848-0475 - Cell: 970-630-1879tel:970-630-1879 ___
Re: [Ubnt_users] Interface Usage Amounts
I have not heard of any compression atall, simply frame aggregation. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 01/06/2015 06:04 AM, Clay Stewart wrote: So the stats as is on INTERFACES is a little useless, if I am right and it is counting UBNT compressed data on the WLAN side... unless there was a new column that gave the compression ratio. That would be interesting to see, especially in comparing OS versions and radio models. On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:13 AM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote: Clay, That's interesting too. I'd love to get Ubiquiti's input on this! On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Clay Stewart cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com wrote: Rick, I think the counts are according to where in the stream the data is being calculated, which seems to me to be at the bridging module code. Any RX data is counted twice, once at the port it comes in (LAN or WLAN) and then again transferring the bridge. So adding the RX of both ports equals the bridge total RX. Hat is the easy part. Now my best guess on the harder numbers. First the bridge TX count The program only counts Broadcast traffic, thus only 8.44m out of bridge. Could be that chip does not have storage bits to access? Next, the, I think the answer lies in AirMax perhaps. Wherever compression/decompression is performed. For TX out of WLAN, you would expect data from LAN to be compressed to send Wirelessly to another UBNT AirMax unit... And it is. But in TX to LAN just the opposite, the data has to be decompressed from UBNT proprietary formula into data that any non UBNT unit can use... Thus data leaving out a LAN is bigger And it is. Just an old programmers guess [image: ] On Monday, January 5, 2015, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote: I imagine it might be helpful if I attached a graphic rather than pdf so here it is. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:37 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote: Referring to the attached graph: Why do the interfaces show such a difference in bytes transferred? -- -RickG KyWiFi -- -RickG KyWiFi -- -- Clay Stewart, CEO SCS Broadband 434.263.6363 O 434.942.6510 C cstew...@scsbroadband.com “We Keep You Up and Running” Please send sales inquiries to sa...@scsbroadband.com Please send service/repair requests to supp...@scsbroadband.com ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- -RickG KyWiFi ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] MFi networking
You could always setup a small DHCP server that ignores everything but the MACs of the mFI devices, and setup static registration for them. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/29/2014 11:46 AM, heith wrote: Due to time constraints I shelved our MFis. Now looking into firing them up for a wintertime project for tower monitoring purposes. Before when we played with them they were fully DHCP. With newer firmware are you able to set them up statically with an IP? None of my networks are really set up for DHCP yet, so static would work better at this time Thanks Heith ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] [WISPA Members] What in the world could be causing this?
I wouldn't think it would happen with gel, no. That said, that's exactly what it sounds like. On December 21, 2014 7:59:21 PM AKST, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net wrote: What he's describing is exactly what it looks like when you get water in a cable though, pins 4/5 almost always appear burnt. It can happen with any kind of cable if it gets nicked or sliced... although, I guess it shouldn't happen with gel filled... From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com] Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 10:32 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group; TJ Trout Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] [WISPA Members] What in the world could be causing this? There isn't a gel filled toughcable and he's said it happened on multiple cable types... On December 21, 2014 7:30:17 PM AKST, TJ Trout t...@voltbb.com wrote: Tough cable? On Dec 21, 2014 8:03 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Blue is hot... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 21, 2014 10:52 PM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.commailto:mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: And it seems to burn on the same pins / pair every time. Blue, blue/white and green. -Mike On Dec 21, 2014 7:42 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Small slice or nick in the cable. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 21, 2014 10:39 PM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.commailto:mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: We've had a couple rainstorms out here in Califirnia. Nothing too bad. A little windy... But anyways, i have come across about 6 customers who have a fried/burnt cat5e connector that is plugged into the PoE port of the UBNT injector. Has happened on cabling with and without the ESD drain wire, has happened both on gel-filled and non gel-filled cable, Has happened while plugged directly in wall power and on surge protectors. Has happened on Rockets and Nanostations. However, all were using the UBNT 24VDC/1A PoE injectors. Any ideas? Thanks, Mike ___ Members mailing list memb...@wispa.orgmailto:memb...@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.orgmailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.orgmailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.orgmailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] MIB
Nope On December 19, 2014 9:19:53 PM AKST, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote: Is there one for input voltage? I keep coming across old customers who were upgraded to AirMax but have old 12 volt POE units :( On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Pre 5.6 is just all 1213 or nothing to my knowledge. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 19, 2014 10:30 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote: Does anyone have a MIB anywhere for UBNT products? I know their straightening out of SNMP is only recent. I'm running a tool that scans SNMP throughout the network, but it's not finding UBNT devices because it doesn't have their MIB. Ideas? BTW: GestioIP is the program, an IP management program. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions https://twitter.com/ICSIL ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- -RickG KyWiFi ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
Don't encourage them. They already posted today about their 20Gbps solution on a 2Gbps (HD, 1Gbps FD) platform with a single GigE ethernet port :/ josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/17/2014 02:24 PM, RickG wrote: Well, it could be never like a lot of vendors :) On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote: Right. After two solid days of badgering. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions https://twitter.com/ICSIL -- *From: *Matt Jenkins m...@smarterbroadband.net *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:57:50 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl by Ubiquiti Employee UBNT-Robert 2 weeks ago Options Hi Guys -- Thanks for all the feedback. Here are some quick thoughts from our side: 1. The goal behind our CRM solution is to level the playing field between Tier 1 operators and you guys. We have invested significant RD resources over the past couple years towards providing powerful business software technology which would allow your businesses and networks to scale faster and more efficiently. Our goal has always been to accelerate the growth of our entire Industry and make you guys more successful. 2. We have some powerful features planned that take advantage of the centralized hosting and that is why we decided on a cloud framework 3. A significant piece of Ubiquiti's DNA is about listening to our community. We hear the message about the local hosting requirement loud and clear. We have started on it now and will have solution for local hosting Consider what we have available now as an option to try out. For those of you that will hold off until the local hosting option is available, please feel free to try out the UI and direction and let us know what you think. Thanks, Robert On 12/01/2014 01:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: It's called airCRM. It does billing and control. It's only hosted in the cloud. How could UBNT go this long without a functional control platform only to fuck it up this badly? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
Which I guess would be a problem if you're not already an E-Rate provider (we are). Yes, in certain states I have heard of some crazy things school district admins contacting their friends in the MSP world to come up with an e-rate service RFP (which is tailored for the MSP in mind), e-rate consultants who get paid big $$,$$$ just to come up with an RFP and filter out unwanted offerings, etc. Good-ole boy network type of stuff. (pun intended) josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/16/2014 04:42 AM, ralph wrote: Regarding your mention of the School system- The Schools are getting big in this E-Rate stuff. Entire states are asking for proposals for full managed services, probably both because they can get rid of people and take advantage of the E-Rate. I’ve seen one State’s RFP and it is so full of things that I don’t even know are possible yet… Unless we can play in the E-Rate space, we will have more and more limited usefulness as a provider to Schools and Libraries, I’m afraid. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Steve Barnes Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 9:34 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl I want to first go on record as saying I to dislike the idea of a cloud based management tool. However, I also remember all of us bitching about AC being a Java app and not having a web UI for our phones and other devices. When Ben Moore said that we would not have to worry about that in the next version I kind of thought about a hosted solution, but thought “Oh surly not”. Another point that I want to make is that US WISPs are not their largest market. I am sure that it is a large market for them but not the largest. I expect they are trying to be uniform across all their platforms worldwide. I assume we will see Unifi and Mfi eventually go ALL Cloud based. Everything from AP, CPE, Router, WiFi, Lights, Phones, Cameras, and even thermostat controlled from the cloud. The hacking possibility of all this is huge. But everything I see is moving this way. The local school Corp in our area just released 2 techs and converted ever thing they could to virtual off-site with remote monitoring and control of all equipment from WiFi Aps and Net Switches to Servers and workstations. The IT Manager says he loves the reduced work load but sees now he has handed the keys to someone else and has a lot less control. All he does now is move wires and swap equipment. All the NEST products, personal IP Security Cameras all are already in the cloud. The general techy populous are starting to except it. I think lots of WISPs will be less likely since they feel less in control of their networks and we are all about control. But I don’t think we are going to stop this trend. Steven Barnes GM PCSWIN.com Howard LLC. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 10:37 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl Well right. That's why I said few and not none. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions https://twitter.com/ICSIL _ From: Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com mailto:j...@spitwspots.com To: ubnt users ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 9:36:33 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl It was in alpha for 7-8 months before it hit the public beta today. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 06:25 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: It was announced today, so few are familiar. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions https://twitter.com/ICSIL _ From: Robert Andrews mailto:nos...@avantwireless.com nos...@avantwireless.com To: Ubiquiti Users Group mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org ubnt_users@wispa.org Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 9:22:29 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl Ok, but when the device contacts the cloud why can't the cloud at that point start the update? I'm not really familiar with the product but what is the frequency of the cloud to ground discharge ( or the other way around )... On 12/1/14 7:10 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: The cloud doesn't contact the devices, the devices initiate connection to the cloud. (to be fair) josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] While Ben is paying attention to suggestions...
Thosepeople are crazy, and now you've got me running link calcs to see how this is even possible josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/11/2014 09:24 AM, Ben Moore wrote: 40 mile AF24 links are some of the shorter ones... I don't see a dual band AF happening...Way too many variables/challenges. How come you wouldn't just do AF24 as primary and AF5 as backup with failover? On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote: Dual band AF. AF5 and AF24 in one unit. You can enjoy epic throughput most of the time, but then you can reliably put the AF further apart than 2 miles (in the Chicago metro anyway). I assume you'll respond with forum posts of people doing 40 mile AF24 shots, but no. I want full speed and reliable. I think that sort of setup would be great in most units above 10 GHz. Could optionally allow you to disable the 5 gig radio until needed. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
I can't express how sad that makes me :[ josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/11/2014 09:31 AM, Ben Moore wrote: Hi Randy - This is inbound. Thanks, Ben On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Randy Cosby dco...@infowest.com mailto:dco...@infowest.com wrote: So I have a question AirPrism ... Is it a one-way filter, or two-way? In other words, I know it cleans up the incoming signal, but does it also clean up the outgoing signal so you have less bleed into adjoining channels? On 12/10/2014 8:05 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote: Well we've been running their AC gear and it is not the same. Regards, Chuck On Dec 10, 2014, at 9:16 PM, Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com mailto:j...@spitwspots.com wrote: Multi-lane-Rf != airprism? I'm pretty sure I was told by people at Ubiquiti that it was the same thing, just kind of an Earlier Version type thing. Is that not correct? josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 12/10/2014 05:08 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote: No, that wasn't the hardware. Regards, Chuck On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Chris Ruschmann ch...@scsalaska.net mailto:ch...@scsalaska.net wrote: Didn't they already do this? I though the UAP Outdoor plus was the beta hardware for this? -Original Message- From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Philip Dorr Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 2:44 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs Are the 2.4Ghz AC going to be down converted 5.8Ghz radios, or is someone developing a custom chip? On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com wrote: They will be staggered...Many of the AC products are just being released...so it will be staggered. On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net mailto:r...@triadwireless.net wrote: Ben, is that the same timeline as the rest of the Powerbeam/Nanobeam DFS like end of the first quarter of 2015? I’m really trying to schedule stuff but this issue is hanging me up. rory From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of RickG Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 11:56 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs Ben Moore via wispa.org http://wispa.org 3:17 PM (10 hours ago) We already have these in transit. I would expect DFS to be available on these early next year. The NanoBeams do not have DFS yet...but they will. On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net mailto:r...@triadwireless.net wrote: I might have missed this but does the AC product line support U-NII 1 and DFS? Rory From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ben Moore Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 5:42 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs Yeah, performance with AC is priority # 1. You can see current performance with PTMP from Chuck's post. Another should be posted shortly. There are some really cool enhancements/features with 7.1/AC. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Kees H wi...@calbroadband.com mailto:wi...@calbroadband.com wrote: Some here, don't look back a new day is breakin'. I assume the backward compatibility will result in a performance hit. Thank you Ben! I know a lot of people want backwards compatibility... but I for one want forwards movement! Even if it ultimately means no backwards compatibility. On 12/9/14, 3:21 PM, Ben Moore wrote: Backwards compatibility is planned, but will be some
Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
Yes josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/09/2014 03:29 PM, Kees H wrote: So I can load the ptmp firmware on a Rocket AC light? - Original Message - *From:* Ben Moore mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:23 AM *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs Yes, PTMP firmware is available for download now. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net mailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: I'm pretty sure one of the last betas actually did add PtMP I wouldn't expect backwards compatibility any too soon though. *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:19 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs No, but they're not PtMP yet either. Thus far only PtP. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com mailto:st...@pcswin.com *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 1:18:56 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs Any word about backwards compatibility with Airmax products? *Steven Barnes* GM PCSWIN.com Howard LLC. *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 2:08 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs For those of you that have them... are they working well? Was there anything new in their announcement today? It didn't seem like it. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
Sometimes I win :( josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/09/2014 03:35 PM, Ben Moore wrote: Are you sure??? ;-) On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com mailto:j...@spitwspots.com wrote: HAH I WIN j/k :P josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 12/09/2014 03:31 PM, Ben Moore wrote: Yes. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Kees H wi...@calbroadband.com mailto:wi...@calbroadband.com wrote: So I can load the ptmp firmware on a Rocket AC light? - Original Message - *From:* Ben Moore mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:23 AM *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs Yes, PTMP firmware is available for download now. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net mailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: I'm pretty sure one of the last betas actually did add PtMP I wouldn't expect backwards compatibility any too soon though. *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:19 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs No, but they're not PtMP yet either. Thus far only PtP. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com mailto:st...@pcswin.com *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 1:18:56 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs Any word about backwards compatibility with Airmax products? *Steven Barnes* GM PCSWIN.com Howard LLC. *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 2:08 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs For those of you that have them... are they working well? Was there anything new in their announcement today? It didn't seem like it. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems
I've found that when you upgrade a device to 5.5.10, you'll often have to upgrade it to 5.5.10 twice. Simply reloading 5.5.10 and upgrading fixes it. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/08/2014 07:17 AM, Kees H wrote: You must have already DFS enabled in that rocket. Mike is talking about an older rocket before DFS was approved on the rockets. I ran into the same issue trying to use the 5240. I upgraded directly to 5.5.10 and no DFS nor 5160-5240 was avalable. I downgraded checked the uni box entered my codes and voila when I upgraded to 5.5.10 there was the 5160-5240. (eventhought those are not DFS :-) - Original Message - *From:* Josh Luthman mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 5:17 PM *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems I just upgraded a pair of Rockets to 5.5.10 and was able to enable DFS. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 7, 2014 8:11 PM, Jason Bailey j284...@yahoo.com mailto:j284...@yahoo.com wrote: Going back to 5.5.8 and clicking the uni-2 box on the system page will get you there. On Sunday, December 7, 2014 8:08 PM, Kees H wi...@calbroadband.com mailto:wi...@calbroadband.com wrote: You have to downgrade the software ( I think it was 5.5.4 that had the DFS key) then enter the dfs key and then upgrade. - Original Message - *From:* Mike Hammett mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 11:00 AM *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems I believe that has been done. Definitely the reboot both sides. The DFS checkbox\fields are definitely not there. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com http://www.ics-il.com/ *From: *Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Sunday, December 7, 2014 12:47:46 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems Old rocket, plug in DFS credentials for your company, reboot BOTH SIDES. BOTH. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 7, 2014 1:45 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote: I have some old Rockets (maybe 5.2.1 vintage?). I upgraded them as needed throughout the years. The past day or two, performance in on part of the network has been erratic to say the best of it. I noticed that they were in Compliance Test mode, but didn't have the input boxes for the DFS stuff, so I must have entered it at one point, but never actually moved over. They were on 5.5.2. Don't fuck with what works. Well, now it's not working right. I upgrade to 5.5.4, then 5.5.10. I set the country code to US no DFS channels show up on the AP. Do I need to reboot it after setting it to US so that I can get the DFS channels? A reset to defaults and starting over is kinda out of the question at the moment. Any other ideas? If I have to climb to replace radios, ePMPs are going up instead. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com http://www.ics-il.com/ ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems
For clarification - the 2nd upgrade doesn't automaticallyenable dfs support, youstill have to add that first. What the 2nd upgrade to the same firmware fixes is the 5150-5250 not showing up. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/08/2014 07:22 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote: I've found that when you upgrade a device to 5.5.10, you'll often have to upgrade it to 5.5.10 twice. Simply reloading 5.5.10 and upgrading fixes it. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com On 12/08/2014 07:17 AM, Kees H wrote: You must have already DFS enabled in that rocket. Mike is talking about an older rocket before DFS was approved on the rockets. I ran into the same issue trying to use the 5240. I upgraded directly to 5.5.10 and no DFS nor 5160-5240 was avalable. I downgraded checked the uni box entered my codes and voila when I upgraded to 5.5.10 there was the 5160-5240. (eventhought those are not DFS :-) - Original Message - *From:* Josh Luthman mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 5:17 PM *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems I just upgraded a pair of Rockets to 5.5.10 and was able to enable DFS. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 7, 2014 8:11 PM, Jason Bailey j284...@yahoo.com mailto:j284...@yahoo.com wrote: Going back to 5.5.8 and clicking the uni-2 box on the system page will get you there. On Sunday, December 7, 2014 8:08 PM, Kees H wi...@calbroadband.com mailto:wi...@calbroadband.com wrote: You have to downgrade the software ( I think it was 5.5.4 that had the DFS key) then enter the dfs key and then upgrade. - Original Message - *From:* Mike Hammett mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 11:00 AM *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems I believe that has been done. Definitely the reboot both sides. The DFS checkbox\fields are definitely not there. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com http://www.ics-il.com/ *From: *Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Sunday, December 7, 2014 12:47:46 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems Old rocket, plug in DFS credentials for your company, reboot BOTH SIDES. BOTH. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 7, 2014 1:45 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote: I have some old Rockets (maybe 5.2.1 vintage?). I upgraded them as needed throughout the years. The past day or two, performance in on part of the network has been erratic to say the best of it. I noticed that they were in Compliance Test mode, but didn't have the input boxes for the DFS stuff, so I must have entered it at one point, but never actually moved over. They were on 5.5.2. Don't fuck with what works. Well, now it's not working right. I upgrade to 5.5.4, then 5.5.10. I set the country code to US no DFS channels show up on the AP. Do I need to reboot it after setting it to US so that I can get the DFS channels? A reset to defaults and starting over is kinda out of the question at the moment. Any other ideas? If I have to climb to replace radios, ePMPs are going up instead. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com http://www.ics-il.com/ ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list
Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems
And you're on 5.5.10 after double-flashing, right? josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/08/2014 01:16 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: Nope, no DFS channels after setting US and picking a channel in 5.8. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, December 8, 2014 10:52:50 AM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems Thanks to Josh Reynolds: XM.v5.5.6# cat /tmp/system.cfg | grep -i dfs radio.1.dfs.status=enabled So DFS is enabled. I noticed that the top of 5.8 is only around -80 noise, so maybe I can get a link after all. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, December 8, 2014 10:25:55 AM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems That's what I'm thinking Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net mailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: I wonder if there's some kind of a bug with entering the DFS code when it's in compliance mode. *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net] *Sent:* Monday, December 08, 2014 10:19 AM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems On the lower versions mine does not have the checkbox. I assume that I already entered that DFS information long ago when I received it from UBNT - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Kees H wi...@calbroadband.com mailto:wi...@calbroadband.com *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, December 8, 2014 10:17:25 AM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems You must have already DFS enabled in that rocket. Mike is talking about an older rocket before DFS was approved on the rockets. I ran into the same issue trying to use the 5240. I upgraded directly to 5.5.10 and no DFS nor 5160-5240 was avalable. I downgraded checked the uni box entered my codes and voila when I upgraded to 5.5.10 there was the 5160-5240. (eventhought those are not DFS :-) - Original Message - *From:* Josh Luthman mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 5:17 PM *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems I just upgraded a pair of Rockets to 5.5.10 and was able to enable DFS. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 7, 2014 8:11 PM, Jason Bailey j284...@yahoo.com mailto:j284...@yahoo.com wrote: Going back to 5.5.8 and clicking the uni-2 box on the system page will get you there. On Sunday, December 7, 2014 8:08 PM, Kees H wi...@calbroadband.com mailto:wi...@calbroadband.com wrote: You have to downgrade the software ( I think it was 5.5.4 that had the DFS key) then enter the dfs key and then upgrade. - Original Message - *From:* Mike Hammett mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 11:00 AM *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems I believe that has been done. Definitely the reboot both sides
Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsZIO-vmn3c josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/08/2014 02:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: Per Josh Reynolds's recommendation, I flashed 5.5.10 twice. That let me choose DFS channels. I flashed it a third time and it let me get 5150.The first and last config files are identical. The one in the middle is just reverse alphabetical order from the others. If I just keep flashing can I get 4.9 and all the other bands? Maybe it becomes a 10GigE radio? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, December 8, 2014 5:06:39 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems That makes no sense, how would multiple identical writes get different results? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 8, 2014 6:02 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote: UBNT: If at first first your firmware does not succeed, try, try, try, try, try, try, try again. I had to flash 5.5.10 three times to get what I'm supposed to be getting. Well, that I'm aware of. If anything else is missing, I'll have to go again. ;-) - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com mailto:j...@spitwspots.com *To: *ubnt users ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, December 8, 2014 4:37:08 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems And you're on 5.5.10 after double-flashing, right? josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 12/08/2014 01:16 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: Nope, no DFS channels after setting US and picking a channel in 5.8. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, December 8, 2014 10:52:50 AM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems Thanks to Josh Reynolds: XM.v5.5.6# cat /tmp/system.cfg | grep -i dfs radio.1.dfs.status=enabled So DFS is enabled. I noticed that the top of 5.8 is only around -80 noise, so maybe I can get a link after all. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, December 8, 2014 10:25:55 AM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems That's what I'm thinking Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net mailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: I wonder if there's some kind of a bug with entering the DFS code when it's in compliance mode. *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics
Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
Well said, Justin. /tipshat josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/03/2014 02:38 PM, Justin Wilson wrote: Part of it for me is the perception of UBNT as a company. We aren’t like Apple consumers. For the most part, most of us are not buying these products to jack with them at Starbucks and drink Coffee. We are out on towers, in all kinds of weather, deploying these. No matter the driving factor, the majority of these networks are here to make money. I, for one, have bet my house and my future on UBNT products in the past. It was no different than betting on another vendor, but I chose UBNT for several reasons. Price was a factor but not the only one. Robert and Staff, please don’t misunderstand the passion for these folks being fanboys. Sure, the inner geek in everyone wants the shiny new gadget. But at the end of the day we all want to go home and be able to set our thermostat at 71 instead of 50. :-) This is about providing a service and being in business. Tools like AirControl means we can do that extra install instead of having the programmer spend their time figuring out how to pull data from the radio or dump into some 3rd party app. We all know monitoring and proactive solutions are essential in this business. I want to know if my business customers are getting what they pay for. If I have SLA customers I want to prove to them we are living up to expectations. Having that data might mean keeping them or not. A complete product family means we have a lower TCO. Now, back to perception. If I am putting my house on the line would I continue to do so for a company that hasn’t finished a key product like AC in how many years? Version 1 never was completed. V2 is now dead. What about the Mfi cloud? I want to be able to trust a company with my livelihood. Sure, a software product isn’t the same as a working AP, but it should be a key component. In today’s ISP world information is King. If I have information I know when to upgrade, what customers to proactively fix, and how the overall health of the network is. This is what makes me different than Comcast. I should be able to know everything about what I have. If you want to make it cloud based, how about an appliance we can install locally? Just an idea, in a sea of thousands. But more importantly, help us focus on automating our businesses and being kick butt at it. Give us the tools we actually need. That way we can buy more units from you. Simple. Justin -- Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net http://www.mtin.net http://www.mtin.net/blog Managed Services – xISP Solutions – Data Centers http://www.thebrotherswisp.com Podcast about xISP topics http://www.midwest-ix.com Peering – Transit – Internet Exchange ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
they use powercode for upgrading devices, mass config changes, etc? If so that's cool, we've got a 25k procera box that arrived in our office yesterday and we're about to start our powercode migration next week! :) That said,we have a very functional IPOQUE DPI traffic shaper for sale if anybody wants one. prx5g josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/02/2014 07:41 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: Jab has an old version of Powercode Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 2, 2014 11:25 PM, Jay Weekley par...@cyberbroadband.net mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net wrote: What do companies like Jab and Wisper use? Josh Reynolds wrote: As long as it's something simple with a rudimentary API to build off of, I see no reason why multiple polling/control types couldn't be designed. Select a subnet, select types of polling to perform (ubnt discovery, whatever cambium uses, etc), select admin/password for groups of devices, and add them to the database. Once in the database their is a /int pollingFrequency = x; /and /str pollType = y;/ and /str pollTemplate = z;/, where pollType could be snmp, ssh, agent and pollTemplate could be ubnt,cambium-ePmP,mikrotik, etc. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 12/02/2014 10:15 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: My thought is that as we grow, we'll have different types of equipment out there... UBNT, MT, Cambium, Mimosa, Netonix, SAF, Exalt, servers, etc. In my 36 hours of experience, it seems like that would be the platform to build off of. *shrugs* - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com mailto:j...@spitwspots.com *To: *ubnt users ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Tuesday, December 2, 2014 1:08:12 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl Via Adam? Not likely. I'm doing some work on making sure the new UBNT MIBs are clean and standards based. That may not be a required part of the puzzle though-- snmp is pretty slow. Aircontrol works by authenticating initially as admin, exchanging ssh keys, and then using the device itself to poll stats and send them upstream (I believe, it's been awhile since I've looked into this). I know the proper commands to pull the stats we need for graphing and everything, and we know the ssh commands for upgrading and things like that. Diagnosing the config isn't hard, although the order of the config is often jumbled from device to device and version to version-- but it's mostly the same. Just need somebody who can create a basic webpage with auth, load up x devices per page, a basic search function, and some sorts for organizing CPEs per AP MAC. Scheduling would be nice eventually. This can't be that hard. I used to do stuff far more complicated than this, but I haven't done any webdesign/css/php since like '99. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 12/02/2014 09:55 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: Think we could get enough stuff into Observium? It already pulls OS\package versions. So it knows what's running on it. It supports external apps. Maybe we could get a firmware push system into it. It has Rancid to pull configurations. Rancid can also push commands out to all of the devices. Setup a UBNT config file format for the pulling and setup a method to push configurations back out? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com mailto:j...@spitwspots.com *To: *ubnt users ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Tuesday, December 2, 2014 12:45:53 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl looks like we're going to have to come up with a third party
Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working
Toughswitches are fundamentally broken and we have been pulling them off our network. If you need more info, there's like a 25 page thread on the Ubiquiti forum. Also, you can't use them to generate much traffic as everything will be done by the management cpu/interface, which is 100Mb. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 12:11 PM, RickG wrote: Agreed. Just wanted to confirm. Will have to chase the problem down! On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: You should be getting 770 megs on a test in either direction (even at the same time!) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:06 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com wrote: ToughSwitches on both ends on gigabit ports. I thought maybe laptop was maxed out until I ran IPerf from TS8 to TS8. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: 100 megabit switch between laptop and Airfiber? Is it linked at gig? Is your laptop's CPU maxed out? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com wrote: It might be the capacity but when I test I only get around 100Mbps. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote: iPerf is not included with airFiber as it isn't needed. What it tells you the channel capacity is is what the channel capacity is. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com *From: *RickG rgunder...@gmail.com mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 2:48:52 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working Is there a trick to getting iperf to work on AirFiber? On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net wrote: I usually just SSH to the client radio/far side, run iperf -s then go to one of my servers in the data center and run iperf -c (client IP) -P5 works better than the web interface anyway On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Daniel Peoples dpe...@gmail.com mailto:dpe...@gmail.com wrote: For speedtests I actually have a 5 year old bullet m5 in my NOC with the wlan disabled on the latest firmware, it has to be rebooted about once a month for it to work. Also, I don't know when they changed it, but for some reason the results of the speedtests(which I thought were UDP) are actually what I can real world get with TCP on that same circuit. Anyone know whats up with this? I have tested from several different points in our network with a variety of backhauls to that bulletm5 and get real world TCP speeds now a days. /Daniel Peoples/ Resonance Broadband /Resonancebroadband.com/ http://Resonancebroadband.com 918-429-3620 On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Tim Kerns t...@cv-access.com mailto:t...@cv-access.com wrote: Not so easy to doif you have, like me,some bullets or air grids then they can
Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
Weare as well josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 12:35 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: On 12/1/14, 13:16, Josh Luthman wrote: Us: We want a working AirControl for our Ubnt gear!!! Ubnt: Here is a solution to a problem you didn't have. I'm still using the original AirControl. It's mostly fine, well, as fine as fine gets for something UBNT abandoned because of reasons. ~Seth ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working
I think you're misunderstanding a bit, you don't want the switch to generate traffic, that's not the problem.You want to test on devices on the other ends (connected to) the switch that pass through the link, something like an x86 pc or ccr or even edgerouter/pro that can generate lots of traffic. The TS's though, you will see weird throughput issues with them, and you will have around .2-.5% packet loss. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 12:40 PM, RickG wrote: Confirmed. I just ran IPerf from one TS8 to another TS8 and just get around 100MBps! I'm going to move them to a tower with less traffic then. Now what do I use for a higher capacity switch? I hate to put a high dollar switch in a rough environment. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com mailto:j...@spitwspots.com wrote: Toughswitches are fundamentally broken and we have been pulling them off our network. If you need more info, there's like a 25 page thread on the Ubiquiti forum. Also, you can't use them to generate much traffic as everything will be done by the management cpu/interface, which is 100Mb. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 12:11 PM, RickG wrote: Agreed. Just wanted to confirm. Will have to chase the problem down! On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: You should be getting 770 megs on a test in either direction (even at the same time!) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:06 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com wrote: ToughSwitches on both ends on gigabit ports. I thought maybe laptop was maxed out until I ran IPerf from TS8 to TS8. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: 100 megabit switch between laptop and Airfiber? Is it linked at gig? Is your laptop's CPU maxed out? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com wrote: It might be the capacity but when I test I only get around 100Mbps. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote: iPerf is not included with airFiber as it isn't needed. What it tells you the channel capacity is is what the channel capacity is. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com *From: *RickG rgunder...@gmail.com mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 2:48:52 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working Is there a trick to getting iperf to work on AirFiber? On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net wrote: I usually just SSH to the client radio/far side, run iperf -s then go to one of my servers in the data center and run iperf -c (client IP) -P5 works better than the web interface anyway On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Daniel Peoples dpe...@gmail.com mailto:dpe...@gmail.com wrote: For speedtests I actually have a 5 year old bullet m5 in my NOC with the wlan disabled on the latest firmware, it has to be rebooted about once a month
Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working
It doesn't matter, the CPU can't generate that much traffic. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 12:58 PM, RickG wrote: To be clear, I am not using the TS8 management interface. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net mailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: I would hope that the switch will actually handle the capacity... it's just that the management interface won't, so your tests are going to be wrong. *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of RickG [rgunder...@gmail.com mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Monday, December 01, 2014 3:40 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working Confirmed. I just ran IPerf from one TS8 to another TS8 and just get around 100MBps! I'm going to move them to a tower with less traffic then. Now what do I use for a higher capacity switch? I hate to put a high dollar switch in a rough environment. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com mailto:j...@spitwspots.com wrote: Toughswitches are fundamentally broken and we have been pulling them off our network. If you need more info, there's like a 25 page thread on the Ubiquiti forum. Also, you can't use them to generate much traffic as everything will be done by the management cpu/interface, which is 100Mb. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 12:11 PM, RickG wrote: Agreed. Just wanted to confirm. Will have to chase the problem down! On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: You should be getting 770 megs on a test in either direction (even at the same time!) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:06 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com wrote: ToughSwitches on both ends on gigabit ports. I thought maybe laptop was maxed out until I ran IPerf from TS8 to TS8. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: 100 megabit switch between laptop and Airfiber? Is it linked at gig? Is your laptop's CPU maxed out? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com wrote: It might be the capacity but when I test I only get around 100Mbps. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote: iPerf is not included with airFiber as it isn't needed. What it tells you the channel capacity is is what the channel capacity is. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com *From: *RickG rgunder...@gmail.com mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 2:48:52 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working Is there a trick to getting iperf to work on AirFiber? On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net wrote: I usually just SSH to the client
Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
That doesn't surprise me at all :/ josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 03:14 PM, Kees H wrote: It surprises me that they did not ask wispa. They are on this group. Who better to tell them what wisps are looking for. - Original Message - *From:* Mike Hammett mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent:* Monday, December 01, 2014 1:40 PM *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl I saw bits and pieces along the way and told them no every time. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com mailto:j...@spitwspots.com *To: *ubnt users ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 3:37:55 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl I'm not sure how much I can say on this topic, but I will say that over a year ago when this was proposed everyone told them (to their faces) NO, we do not want this. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 12:35 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: I don't know how anyone could read their target market this badly. It's like Ferrari or Lamborghini coming out with something to compete with the Geo Metro. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 3:09:39 PM *Subject: *[Ubnt_users] New airControl It's called airCRM. It does billing and control. It's only hosted in the cloud. How could UBNT go this long without a functional control platform only to fuck it up this badly? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
*shrug* Because they did josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 12:36 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: That looks like it would be a great solution for a wisp with, oh say, 50 customers and no intention of growing... That looks really terrible. Why would they think that was a good idea? *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net] *Sent:* Monday, December 01, 2014 3:35 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl I don't know how anyone could read their target market this badly. It's like Ferrari or Lamborghini coming out with something to compete with the Geo Metro. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 3:09:39 PM *Subject: *[Ubnt_users] New airControl It's called airCRM. It does billing and control. It's only hosted in the cloud. How could UBNT go this long without a functional control platform only to fuck it up this badly? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
No one in the SU group or the pre-SU group did either. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 04:18 PM, Chris Ruschmann wrote: Noone on the forum asked for this. *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Kees H *Sent:* Monday, December 1, 2014 4:17 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl Because they listened to the people on their forum That looks like it would be a great solution for a wisp with, oh say, 50 customers and no intention of growing... That looks really terrible. Why would they think that was a good idea? *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net] *Sent:* Monday, December 01, 2014 3:35 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl I don't know how anyone could read their target market this badly. It's like Ferrari or Lamborghini coming out with something to compete with the Geo Metro. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 3:09:39 PM *Subject: *[Ubnt_users] New airControl It's called airCRM. It does billing and control. It's only hosted in the cloud. How could UBNT go this long without a functional control platform only to fuck it up this badly? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
Excellent write-up. I feel UBNT has kind of lost their way in certain areas. I don't understand mFi at all. UBNT-Vision (aircam stuff) is kind of a messstill. ToughSwitch debacle, green cable (tough lesson for us/them to learn), etc. AF24 is great. AF5 is... can be great in the right situation. EdgeSwitch ... needs alot of cli/gui work, but the features are there. EdgeRouter-lite... amazing performance out of a $99 device. EdgeRouter is 2Mpps and about $80 cheaper than a CCR1009-8G-1S, but it does miss some of the nice mikrotik tools. ER is rumoured to have MPLS and very likely MPLS-TE soon. USG/US is cool, very meraki-ish. The phones... some of the best I've ever seen hardware wise, but it'll be interesting to see if Enterprise is really ready for Android on the desk... AirMax-AC shipping now in PtP... very good throughput, needs that DFS and lower band. Real-time airview is amazing. Can't wait for the full version with AirPrism tech. TDMA offloading will be very nice for PtMP. There's some hit and miss for sure. I just wish there was more hit and less miss. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 05:14 PM, Tom Fadgen wrote: I am sure glad that I own my business; and that said, as a business owner I look to make choices from those available; not cry over what is not! One thing is going to solve this problem, the one with UBNT not listing to their customers and providing a lot of shit we do not want or need from them. That is competition; plan and simple. I love the folks at UBNT for what they have done, disrupting the wireless infrastructure market. They kicked Motorola's ass and took market share at an alarming rate. Motorola was big and bloated with unnecessary overhead and products that were overpriced and underperformed. Here is what I do not like since their release of Airmax: * Took way too much time enabling DFS frequencies on original equipment * Bug ridden firmware releases * Lack of supply of their Products * Half baked attempts with Management Tools AC1, AC2 * Lack/Poor support of SNMP so we can do it better with other tools * Lower/DFS and UNII1 support for Nanobeam * Still no AIRMAX version 2.0 equipment or whatever they want to name it(I have not signed an NDA) * Lack of focus on WISP Core needs, gave us routers, when we all use Mikrotik, gave us cameras, when were not asking and now a billing platform when I already have one and love it! We can all add to this list... Now back to the competition deal, Cambium showed the redesigned Force 100, now called force 110 at WISPAPALOZZA 2014 and less than 45 days later I received it. Last year they announced the ePMP 1000 line right before WISPAPALOZZA and I ordered it while at the show and had it waiting for me at the office when I returned. I did some testing for about a week and switched 35 customers over and had not one complaint from them, only my tech's because the web interface was buggy. I just wonder if Cambium(no NDA's here either) just might beat UBNT with a faster/enhanced ePMP before UBNT gets their new stuff together. Now, here's to Cambium -- may you be extremely successful and on time with your road map. Now , here's to MIMOSA -- may you deliver on what you promised, both technically and on time(looking kind of bad so far on the time deal Jaime). Now, here's to UBNT -- may you find your way home back to your original market, the WISPS's before Wall Street crushes you for not making your numbers again! You had your chance to crush your heavyweight champion but you gave them time to come back and maybe, kick some UBNT Now, I am seriously rooting for them all, we need competition, it is healthy for our industry. Tom Fadgen coastinet.com On 12/1/2014 1:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: It's called airCRM. It does billing and control. It's only hosted in the cloud. How could UBNT go this long without a functional control platform only to fuck it up this badly? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
The cloud doesn't contact the devices, the devices initiate connection to the cloud. (to be fair) josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/01/2014 06:08 PM, Robert Andrews wrote: Kinda hard to point to a bunch of wavy hand WISPs about the size of your management adoption for the investors, but nuts dead simple if they are on your cloud system... And if the FCC changes the rules Guess what can be forced to update for compliance with or without your say so... Hm On 12/1/14 4:45 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: On 12/1/14, 16:44, Kees H wrote: Why would I waste public ips on my radios, so ubnt can have control of my radios? Don't they know ARIN is running out of IPv4 addresses? But it's CLOUD. ~Seth ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Weird site survey activity
5.5.10 (and maybe 5.5.8?) for some reason shows like a cache of the results. We always have to scan twice. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 11/30/2014 08:06 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: Closed the survey window, logged out and after logging in and scanning again it's still there on the wrong frequency o.O Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net wrote: I've always noticed odd things when doing site survey's. Hitting refresh rarely seems to actually do a new scan. If you close it down and open it back up, what does it show? On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: I'm wondering how long the site survey page takes to refresh. I've got a scan on it showing a backhaul that is/was 5660 but I've changed that to 5765 about 20 minutes ago. I manually scan and still see it on the wrong frequency... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Adair Winter VP, Network Operations / Owner Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 tel:806.316.5071 C: 806.231.7180 tel:806.231.7180 http://www.amarillowireless.net ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Speed test no working
test from a station in a PtP link, and got this message: Error: Specified device is not compatible for speedtest. Both radios are BulletM5 with v5.5.4. I got the same error when tried in a link with RocketM365 in both ends and v5.5.6. Also I've tried in a PtoP connection also with Bullets, but M2 and v.5.5.6 with the same result. The issue is always running the speed test from the station to the AP. Have you guys seen this issue? Any suggestions on how I can fix it. Thanks, Eduardo ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- -RickG KyWiFi ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] DMZ Management Ports, what are they?
oops not 21, 23. possibly 23 for telnet On 11/14/2014 03:36 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote: I assume 80, 22, 443. What others are there? I can't find it in any of the manuals. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Requirements...
Talking about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetIQ_eDirectory and this: https://www.netiq.com/products/edirectory/ ? Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 11/11/2014 11:43 AM, Sam wrote: Actually, eDirectory runs circles around AD. And it runs on just about every platform. Sam On 9/11/2014 13:21, Mike Hammett wrote: Linux takes less time to setup than Windows, though nothing can hold a candle to AD. I run both Windows and Linux servers, mostly Linux. Most any reasonably competent IT person can handle Linux reasonably well, especially ones that used DOS. it just isn't that hard. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
Different SoC. The XM SoC was EOL'd. I think there's some bits on this from the latest quarterly transcript. Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 11/10/2014 02:30 PM, Blair Davis wrote: Isn't the XW for one CPU and the XM for a different CPU? -- On 11/10/2014 6:06 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: It's a free upgrade essentially. They didn't want to make a new product since they sell a couple dozen of them every month. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 10, 2014 6:03 PM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net mailto:r...@triadwireless.net wrote: I’m trying to figure out why they use XW firmware when other nanostations use xm firmware. If they have faster processors, that’s important for network design. *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard *Sent:* Monday, November 10, 2014 3:49 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? oh... yeah, I read that wrong. don't mind me, my brain is slightly non-functional today... *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net] *Sent:* Monday, November 10, 2014 4:47 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? I think that's what Rory was saying. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net mailto:mat...@litewire.net *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, November 10, 2014 4:42:28 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? I'm pretty sure the XW Locos/NanoStations and Rockets already support DFS... it's just the NanoBeam/PowerBeam that doesn't. *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Rory Conaway [r...@triadwireless.net mailto:r...@triadwireless.net] *Sent:* Sunday, November 09, 2014 6:51 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? We can’t use them yet until DFS, all our APs are there. Rory *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds *Sent:* Sunday, November 9, 2014 5:48 PM *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? We haven't received any XW locos/nanos/nanobridges/rockets yet, except for RocketM5-Ti XW's. Our nanobeams that we have as CPEs are working just fine with RocketM5 APs. No low rates, good ccq, no WDS problems. Running 5.5.9 on the nanobeams, and 5.5.8 or 5.5.10 on the RocketM5's. Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 11/09/2014 03:40 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: Yes and Ubnt APs. Nsm5 I think was our problem. Replaced with a beam5 and I could bridge again. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 9, 2014 7:27 PM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net wrote: WDS issues with non ubiquiti ap's? On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Probably since the Nanobeams definitely have WDS issues. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 9, 2014 7:19 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote: Any issues on the new hardware inside the old models? - Mike Hammett
Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
They should call all of the XW products Mk2's. That's how ironman labels all his stuff. They need snazy stickers on the boxes that talk about the faster! new and improved! products. Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 11/10/2014 03:43 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: It does. anything with XW firmware on it is going to have the newer, faster processor. *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Rory Conaway [r...@triadwireless.net] *Sent:* Monday, November 10, 2014 5:47 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? Right now everything talks to everyone else. I’m just trying to figure out if the NS5ML has the newer, faster, processor. Rory *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Blair Davis *Sent:* Monday, November 10, 2014 4:39 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? So then, what version of firmware is needed on my XM AP's to talk with XW clients? Are there limits on XM AP's talking to mixed XM, XW and legacy 4.02 clients? -- On 11/10/2014 6:33 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: Yup. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 10, 2014 6:30 PM, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net mailto:the...@wmwisp.net wrote: Isn't the XW for one CPU and the XM for a different CPU? -- On 11/10/2014 6:06 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: It's a free upgrade essentially. They didn't want to make a new product since they sell a couple dozen of them every month. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 10, 2014 6:03 PM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net mailto:r...@triadwireless.net wrote: I’m trying to figure out why they use XW firmware when other nanostations use xm firmware. If they have faster processors, that’s important for network design. *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard *Sent:* Monday, November 10, 2014 3:49 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? oh... yeah, I read that wrong. don't mind me, my brain is slightly non-functional today... *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net] *Sent:* Monday, November 10, 2014 4:47 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? I think that's what Rory was saying. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net mailto:mat...@litewire.net *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Monday, November 10, 2014 4:42:28 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? I'm pretty sure the XW Locos/NanoStations and Rockets already support DFS... it's just the NanoBeam/PowerBeam that doesn't. *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Rory Conaway [r...@triadwireless.net mailto:r...@triadwireless.net] *Sent:* Sunday, November 09, 2014 6:51 PM *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? We can’t use them yet until DFS, all our APs are there. Rory *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds *Sent:* Sunday, November 9, 2014 5:48 PM *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org
Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
We haven't received any XW locos/nanos/nanobridges/rockets yet, except for RocketM5-Ti XW's. Our nanobeams that we have as CPEs are working just fine with RocketM5 APs. No low rates, good ccq, no WDS problems. Running 5.5.9 on the nanobeams, and 5.5.8 or 5.5.10 on the RocketM5's. Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 11/09/2014 03:40 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: Yes and Ubnt APs. Nsm5 I think was our problem. Replaced with a beam5 and I could bridge again. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 9, 2014 7:27 PM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net wrote: WDS issues with non ubiquiti ap's? On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Probably since the Nanobeams definitely have WDS issues. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 9, 2014 7:19 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net wrote: Any issues on the new hardware inside the old models? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org *Sent: *Sunday, November 9, 2014 6:18:05 PM *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? Just had that happen on a RocketM5. I can't keep up. On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:11 PM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net mailto:r...@triadwireless.net wrote: Can I assume that all the NS5M Locos now have the same processors as the Nanobeams? They are coming preloaded with XW firmware. Very confusing. Rory Conaway Triad Wireless 4226 S. 37th Street Phoenix, Az. 85040 602-426-0542 tel:602-426-0542 r...@triadwireless.net mailto:r...@triadwireless.net www.triadwireless.net http://www.triadwireless.net ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Adair Winter VP, Network Operations / Owner Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 tel:806.316.5071 C: 806.231.7180 tel:806.231.7180 http://www.amarillowireless.net ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Licensed Gear - WAS: NanoBeam M5 400
Saf Lumina 11GHz Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 11/02/2014 07:42 PM, RickG wrote: And on that note: What are people using for their licensed needs these days? On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net wrote: Licensed gear. :) That's what a guy does. On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Phil Curnutt pcurn...@gmail.com mailto:pcurn...@gmail.com wrote: The reason I asked was because I have a bunch of PowerBridges to replace with something that is DFS certified. We are getting ready to install an AF-5 that is going to take up 70 MHz of space in the 5.8 band with three radios already there and no place to move them to. What's a guy to do? Rockets, I guess, in some kind of enclosure. Phil On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Paul pmcn...@cameron.net mailto:pmcn...@cameron.net wrote: So you are saying we take a risk every time we buy ubnt equipment of notting getting what was promised and expected unless it is already there? Maybe we shouldn't trust ubnt at their word? I have a lot invested in ubnt and they are not feeling very much like a partner anymore! On 11/2/2014 6:41 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: On 11/2/14, 4:20 PM, Paul wrote: So are you saying the Nanobeams and PTP-AC's we have already bought will not certify because of hardware problems? No, he said they have a history of not certifying everything and thus a risk of such a situation. The PowerBridge M5 for example. ~Seth ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- Adair Winter VP, Network Operations / Owner Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 C: 806.231.7180 http://www.amarillowireless.net ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users -- -RickG KyWiFi ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Rackmount 48V inverters for Ubiquiti POPs
I've been looking for the same thing - something that can do per-port for 24/48 volt. southern_drawl Can't find a dang thing. /southern_drawl Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 10/24/2014 02:07 PM, Andris Bjornson wrote: I've been doing DIN rail style small NEMA enclosures at POPs for a while now using Packetflux, Mikrotik and other similar equipment, but now I find myself needing to figure out a similar setup for a rackmount installation. My input voltage is -48VDC at a telco colocation site. I like the gigabit speeds and per-port control of 24V / 48V PoE voltages on the EdgeSwitch and the Netonix switches - but those of course want AC input. Seems like the straightforward option may be to find a 1U Rackmount, 48V inverter. Any good brands / suggestions? Would ideally be ethernet manageable. I'm seeing a lot of high wattage (1000W+) models (Cotek and UniPower) and would like to find something smaller / less expensive. Open to alternate suggestions too, definitely need rackmount and trying to minimize the number of rack U required. Thanks! ᐧ ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
