[Bug 1463120] Re: Failure to boot if fstab disk mounts fail
I work for a major educational system that utilizes Ubuntu Server (14.04, 16.04 LTS) instances on the Amazon Web Services cloud for critical infrastructure. This bug has come up a few times, where an admin has a typo or other error in /etc/fstab, pertaining to a non-OS filesystem (like an EFS data volume), and as a result, the system fails to boot. On a physical machine, this wouldn't be a big deal: press "S" to skip that mountpoint, and keep booting; or if that doesn't work, boot from live media and fix fstab. However, a cloud instance doesn't grant you those options: it hangs forever, and you have no physical keyboard, USB port, or optical drive with which to workaround the problem. I normally wouldn't suggest a certain priority on a bug, but this is a severe liability for anyone running Ubuntu in a cloud computing environment. Therefore, I must respectfully request that this bug be elevated to "Major" or "Critical" status. Thank-you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1463120 Title: Failure to boot if fstab disk mounts fail To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1463120/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1581713] Re: Ubuntu Software asks for an Ubuntu Single Sign-On account to install/remove a snap
*reset -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581713 Title: Ubuntu Software asks for an Ubuntu Single Sign-On account to install/remove a snap To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1581713/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1581713] Re: Ubuntu Software asks for an Ubuntu Single Sign-On account to install/remove a snap
I can confirm the presence of this bug, as well as the login, itself not
working ("an error occurred"). I resent my Ubuntu One password, just to
make sure I wasn't typing it wrong, and the error persists.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581713
Title:
Ubuntu Software asks for an Ubuntu Single Sign-On account to
install/remove a snap
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1581713/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1313539] Re: [DisplayPort] monitor shows black screen and "no input signal" after turning the monitor off and on manually
In case it's needed, here is my lspci output. 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family DRAM Controller (rev 09) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family MEI Controller #1 (rev 04) 00:1a.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #2 (rev 05) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family High Definition Audio Controller (rev 05) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 1 (rev b5) 00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 2 (rev b5) 00:1c.3 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 4 (rev b5) 00:1d.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #1 (rev 05) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation QS67 Express Chipset Family LPC Controller (rev 05) 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family 6 port SATA AHCI Controller (rev 05) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family SMBus Controller (rev 05) 02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Centrino Advanced-N 6230 [Rainbow Peak] (rev 34) 03:00.0 USB controller: Fresco Logic FL1009 USB 3.0 Host Controller (rev 02) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313539 Title: [DisplayPort] monitor shows black screen and "no input signal" after turning the monitor off and on manually To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1313539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1313539] Re: [DisplayPort] monitor shows black screen and "no input signal" after turning the monitor off and on manually
I'm experiencing this issue in Ubuntu 16.04 on a Dell XPS 13 L321X. I'm connecting to a TV using a mini displayport to HDMI adapter. Ubuntu Settings > Display shows only the built-in laptop monitor. Thanks for your work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313539 Title: [DisplayPort] monitor shows black screen and "no input signal" after turning the monitor off and on manually To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1313539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1532097] Re: Upgrade from 14.04 to 15.04 failed due to ubuntu-desktop not being installed
Odd. I originally titled this bug report with the error message I got, regarding a file having been modified in /etc; but I never edited that file (hadn't heard of it until the error message). I would think that the solution in such an instance might be to simply overwrite the file, unless doing so is likely to cause problems for the user's data or installed (still-compatible) programs. I'm sorry to report that I did a clean installation before realizing that I would need to provide further details about the possible bug. (I was on a time crunch to get the machine updated.) I hope some of the submitted info proves useful, somehow; otherwise, don't worry about it. Thanks for your work. :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532097 Title: Upgrade from 14.04 to 15.04 failed due to ubuntu-desktop not being installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1532097/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1532097] [NEW] Upgrade from 14.04 to 15.04 failed due to modified /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades
Public bug reported: Upgrade failed due to the above-mentioned contingency. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:0.220.8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-74.118-generic 3.13.11-ckt30 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-74-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19 Architecture: amd64 CrashDB: ubuntu CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Thu Jan 7 22:39:13 2016 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-16 (967 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 (20130424) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2016-01-08 (0 days ago) VarLogDistupgradeTermlog: mtime.conffile..etc.update.manager.release.upgrades: 2016-01-07T18:01:55.110369 ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade third-party-packages trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532097 Title: Upgrade from 14.04 to 15.04 failed due to modified /etc/update-manager /release-upgrades To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1532097/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 833675] Re: gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in goa_oauth_provider_get_callback_uri()
This bug also affects me on a fresh (like 1 hours ago) install of Ubuntu 13.04 amd64. I ran Empathy, then attempted to set up a Facebook account, which sent me to their website, then gave me a success...this url is like your password message, without actually letting me use the account with Empathy. I then successfully set up my Gmail account with Empathy. After this, whenever I go to the Empathy Accounts menu, or attempt to access Online Accounts through the control center, the Online Accounts window comes up for about 1 second, then disappears. Sometimes, it suggests reporting a bug. Thanks for all your work, and please let me know if you need more information. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833675 Title: gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in goa_oauth_provider_get_callback_uri() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/833675/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 833675] Re: gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in goa_oauth_provider_get_callback_uri()
Oh, and I installed all available updates (and rebooted) before running Empathy for the first time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833675 Title: gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in goa_oauth_provider_get_callback_uri() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/833675/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 833675] Re: gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in goa_oauth_provider_get_callback_uri()
Related bug with workaround in comment #5: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center-signon/+bug/1174936/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833675 Title: gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in goa_oauth_provider_get_callback_uri() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/833675/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052721] Re: Some packages say not available for your current Ubuntu version when viewed from purchase list
Thanks for the reply, John. I managed to fix the problem I had; it turns out I just had something misconfigured. Please disregard my previous post. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052721 Title: Some packages say not available for your current Ubuntu version when viewed from purchase list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/software-center-agent/+bug/1052721/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052721] Re: Some packages say not available for your current Ubuntu version when viewed from purchase list
Just to preempt further posts related to my problem but not related to this bug, the solution is here: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?p=4868804#post4868804 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052721 Title: Some packages say not available for your current Ubuntu version when viewed from purchase list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/software-center-agent/+bug/1052721/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052721] Re: Some packages say not available for your current Ubuntu version when viewed from purchase list
I just got this message while trying to install apps in Linux Mint 13 (AMD64) from the Humble Indie Bundle 7. I can install previous Ubuntu purchases, such as Monster RPG 2, Super Meat Boy, and SpaceChem, some of which I purchased from previous HIBs. I also can't use the humblebundle.com link from my private download page to install these games through the Ubuntu Software Center. The specific games I'm trying to install now are: Legend of Grimrock Closure Snapshot I'd greatly appreciate anything that can be done about this bug. Perhaps this one is related? https://bugs.launchpad.net/elementaryos/+bug/1084529 Thanks for your time and effort. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052721 Title: Some packages say not available for your current Ubuntu version when viewed from purchase list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/software-center-agent/+bug/1052721/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303601] Re: REISUB is broken
I've recently switched (back) to using Linux Mint with Mate. I can confirm that in this distro, REISUB is working just fine. Since Ubuntu is Mint's upstream, it's very likely that the bug is solved in Ubuntu, as well. Thought you might like to know. I see no reason to un-expire this bug, or otherwise keep it open. Thanks for your support. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303601 Title: REISUB is broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/303601/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195630] Re: Can't change permissions on a folder with nautilus.
Thanks! :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195630 Title: Can't change permissions on a folder with nautilus. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/195630/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303601] Re: REISUB is broken
I no longer use Ubuntu, but as of 11.10 (from initial installation to the release of 12.04 with all updates), I found REISUB to be working fine--for what that's worth. As I'd previously had this bug (as noted above), I thought you'd want to know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303601 Title: REISUB is broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/303601/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479813] Re: Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic)
Christopher, I don't know if this last action is premature, since Bryan Paddock evidently has the same problems with version 12.04. As I no longer have access to the laptop in question, I cannot confirm whether there has been a regression since my last post. Bryan, can you perhaps clarify whether this problem still exists (or exists again) with all updates? I'm not personally qualified to say whether the technical details are identical between your case and mine, but I suspect that someone with more knowledge than I have could do so. I'm leaving this as invalid unless reason to change the status is provided. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479813 Title: Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/479813/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 146367] Re: An extra 'executable' bit is seen when POSIX ACL is used by Samba
Sorry to revive an old bug, but I've recently run into this problem. Using the following in smb.conf, when I create a file as a remote user, the Owner's permissions are always set to executable on files (rwxrw- rw-), whereas they should be rw-rw-rw-. [DnD Public] path = /mnt/PERSONAL/Dane/RPGs/DnD Public comment = Players can put stuff in here writeable = yes guest ok = yes guest only = yes force create mode = 0666 force directory mode = 0777 I've tried it with force user = dane in there (since that's my local login, which is set-up in samba's database), but keep getting the same result. Since this is a security problem, depending on the context, and since there's already a patch released upstream, at the link above, I was hoping this could get fixed in a security release sometime soon. (The patch was posted to that page in 2006--if this is, indeed, the same bug.) I might end up patching and compiling Samba, myself, but I'd really rather not dump a pile of make install into my filesystem tree (and that wouldn't fix the bug in the repository, besides). Thanks for reading. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146367 Title: An extra 'executable' bit is seen when POSIX ACL is used by Samba To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/146367/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 146367] Re: An extra 'executable' bit is seen when POSIX ACL is used by Samba
Sorry to revive an old bug, but I've recently run into this problem. Using the following in smb.conf, when I create a file as a remote user, the Owner's permissions are always set to executable on files (rwxrw- rw-), whereas they should be rw-rw-rw-. [DnD Public] path = /mnt/PERSONAL/Dane/RPGs/DnD Public comment = Players can put stuff in here writeable = yes guest ok = yes guest only = yes force create mode = 0666 force directory mode = 0777 I've tried it with force user = dane in there (since that's my local login, which is set-up in samba's database), but keep getting the same result. Since this is a security problem, depending on the context, and since there's already a patch released upstream, at the link above, I was hoping this could get fixed in a security release sometime soon. (The patch was posted to that page in 2006--if this is, indeed, the same bug.) I might end up patching and compiling Samba, myself, but I'd really rather not dump a pile of make install into my filesystem tree (and that wouldn't fix the bug in the repository, besides). Thanks for reading. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146367 Title: An extra 'executable' bit is seen when POSIX ACL is used by Samba To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/146367/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267913] Re: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj
I should also note that I'm using Nvidia drivers 180.13 with a GeForce 9800 GTX, or GTX 560 Ti (when the latter is working--in process of RMA). Some previous posters have mentioned a possible link to the video card and its drivers. I'm currently doing a badblocks on my Linux drive, but in Disk Utility, there's something I thought I should mention, which I don't entirely understand: 5. Reallocation Sector Count: Good - Normalized: 200; Worst: 200; Threshold: 140; Value: 0 sectors. Does this mean that no sectors currently in use are bad, but 200 have been reallocated; or that the 200 number is some kind of setting for when to worry, and there have been no such incidents? I don't know whether this could relate to this bug, but if it does, it would be good to know what I'm looking at. Thanks, all, for your interest in this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267913 Title: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/267913/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267913] Re: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj
0 bad blocks found on my Linux drive. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267913 Title: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/267913/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267913] Re: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj
(Sorry for the wait...) I can now confirm that the error message: [ 31.958964] hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. is still appearing in my 'dmesg | grep hda-intel' output, as of this moment. I'm not experiencing any further problems with massive IO wait, regarding my hard drives, but the system is still a bit sluggish, compared to my Windows 7 installation on the same PC (but on a different drive). I intend to run another badblocks test on my Linux system drive (500GB SATA) to make sure that it's not having problems, but last I checked, it was fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267913 Title: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/267913/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 601709] Re: Laptop goes to sleep right after plugging/unplugging power cord
Sorry for the long delay. After school got out for the semester, my wife got fed-up with it before I could try 11.04, and insisted on re- installing Windows XP. (ugh...) Hopefully darconc will be able to help you with diagnostics. Good luck! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601709 Title: Laptop goes to sleep right after plugging/unplugging power cord To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/601709/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 811008] [NEW] package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Public bug reported: I used this command in preparation for building the Freespace 2 Open alternate Linux launcher: sudo aptitude install build-essential automake1.9 autoconf libreadline5-dev subversion Thanks for your time! ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.46-generic 2.6.38.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: vhba nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jul 15 04:26:55 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta amd64 (20110413) SourcePackage: texinfo Title: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: texinfo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811008 Title: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/811008/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 811008] Re: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811008 Title: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/811008/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267913] Re: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj
I've just determined that my Windows 7 hard drive (750GB, NTFS, /dev/sdb) was faulty. It had around 100 bad sectors reported in the SMART logs, according to the Disk Utility (System Administration Disk Utility [in Natty]), and I discovered that the huge amount of I/O wait occurred only when I was accessing this drive, especially for a long data transfer (copy/move, etc.). Notably, after the first few hundred MB at around 45MB/s, it slowed abruptly to a crawl of about 5MB/s via 3GB/s SATA. It seemed to make little difference whether I had it mounted read-only (which is faster for NTFS on Linux), or r/w, and was equally slow in Windows 7 and in Linux (Ubuntu Natty). I've since replaced the drive with a new 1TB SATA HD after testing it for bad sectors (using 'sudo badblocks -svb 4096 /dev/sdx'), and have noticed a dramatic speed increase. I've not yet checked whether the dmesg logs report this same error message as before, but I'll check when I get around to it. So, here's my request for information from those experiencing this bug: -Please ensure that SMART monitoring is enabled for all your drives, in BIOS. -Open System Administration Disk Utility. Click on each of your drives, in turn, and click on the button for its SMART status. Please copy and paste any error entries you see, as well as anything that stands out to you. -Please run the following command on each of your hard drives. You can do this on multiple drives at once, although I recommend not running many more instances than you have CPU cores. It's OK (and safe) to run this on mounted drives, even while data is being written to them. 'sudo badblocks -svb 4096 /dev/sdx' (Replace sdx with the device name for the hard drive you intend to test. Use only one drive per command, and DO NOT include the partition number--i.e. type /dev/sda, and NOT /dev/sda1.) Post all output from these commands to this thread. If any bad sectors at all are found--which will be noted by their block number--then your drive is bad, and should be replaced. This can usually be done under warranty, via the manufacturer's (Seagate, Western Digital, etc.--not Best Buy or similar). Badblocks will take a VERY long time to run, especially on a broken drive, so please be patient and continue until the end, or until you find a bad sector. -Finally, run this command to get some verification and more information from SMART: 'sudo smartctl --log error /dev/sdx'. Replace sdx with your drive's /dev/ entry. Please post all output from the above. I'm not a developer, but I have a whole lot of experience in dealing with the practical application of hardware testing and business-level computer repair. If my hunch is correct, this will allow you do solve your problems related to this bug once and for all! I'm honestly not sure how the sound driver relates to the performance problems or the hard drive failure I had, but given the excessive I/O wait that slowed down all 4 of my 2.66GHz CPU cores, it wouldn't surprise me if it's causing timeouts or other problems that the sound driver is sensitive to. Good luck, and I look forward to reading your responses! --Dane -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267913 Title: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267913] Re: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj
Notable correction: I should have written 3Gbit/s SATA, not 3GB/s. This amounts to a maximum transfer rate of around 45MB/s. Correction to the information request above: please run badblocks BEFORE any of the other steps, including looking in Disk Utility or running smarctl. (You may have to install smartmontools [spelling?] to have that command available when the time comes.) If you run badblocks first, it will ensure that all sector replacements made from reserved blocks to compensate for read errors during the badblocks test (which reads every block on the drive) will get logged, and thereby provide a more accurate picture of whether bad sectors exist, but have been replaced and hidden/disabled by SMART. This is especially relevant if SMART wasn't already enabled in BIOS, as it will need an opportunity to start gathering data for the log that you will be checking later via Disk Utility and smartctl. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267913 Title: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267913] Re: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj
I'm getting this same message on 11.04 64-bit Desktop. My SATA hard drives are performing slowly and making the whole system slow down much more than they should when I do any hard-drive-intensive task, like copying large files. Could this be related to the error message? RJ Ryan mentioned that hda-intel can share an interrupt with sata_nv. I'm not using Nvidia SATA on this PC, but could hda-intel be having a conflict with my Intel SATA? lspci output is attached, and the error text below. [ 16.483944] hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #1. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. [ 16.613488] hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. ** Attachment added: lspci.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/267913/+attachment/2089449/+files/lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267913 Title: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267913] Re: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj
Here is a more verbose lspci output (using lspci -vvv). ** Attachment added: lspci-verbose.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/267913/+attachment/2089450/+files/lspci-verbose.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267913 Title: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285063] Re: dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one
Thanks for looking into this bug. It looks like this was just a PEBKAC (Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair). :-) Please feel free to close this bug. Do you know if there is any documentation to the effect of where fstab mount points should/should not be? Might be good to post a link here as a resolution to this bug. Have a good one. -- dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285063 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195630] Re: Can't change permissions on a folder with nautilus.
Thanks for posting, alexsimps. Indeed, I have found the umask=022 option to be very useful on NTFS filesystems in the past. Unfortunately, it's with my '/' partition, which is ext4 that I'm noticing the problem. I haven't been able to change any permissions on my NTFS partition using Nautilus, either, but the real problem is with not being able to change user-owned files on my '/' partition (partitularly in /home/dane/blahblahblah). I don't really need to mess with NTFS permissions in Linux very often, so that's not such a big problem. I see that this bug was first reported in 2008. Depending on how many people are affected, does anybody think it should be marked as high priority? (Not trying to be impatient, but I do think this is quite a problem for the systems/users affected.) Thanks. -- Can't change permissions on a folder with nautilus. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195630 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285063] Re: dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one
** Attachment added: Output of above command when bug is present. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks/+bug/285063/+attachment/1734116/+files/udisks-dump_with-bug.txt -- dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285063 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285063] Re: dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one
** Attachment added: Output of above command when bug is NOT present. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks/+bug/285063/+attachment/1734117/+files/udisks-dump_without-bug.txt -- dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285063 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195630] Re: Can't change permissions on a folder with nautilus.
I just upgraded from 9.10 (amd64) to 10.04, and then immediately from 10.04 to 10.10. I have this same problem: When I go to Places Home Folder right-click on Public Permissions tab and try to change any of the File Access drop-downs, they all immediately revert to ---. I have tried using 'chmod dane:dane /home/dane/Public -R' and 'chown a+rwx /home/dane/Public -R' with no effect. I have also tried running nautilus with 'sudo nautilus /home/dane', and have not been able to change the file permissions. The Allow executing file as program box is highlighted (solid orange color), but cannot be checked or un-checked. I will try to attach a screenshot of this. As a result of this, I think, I am unable to use any nautilus-share functionality that requires a change in permissions, such as Allow others to create and delete files in this folder and Guest access (for people without a user account). Whenever I try to use such an option, nautilus entirely crashes (desktop icons flicker and then come back, and all folder windows close). I have tried purging (sudo aptitude purge ...) and re-installing samba, samba-common, samba-common-bin, nautilus- share, nautilus-gksu, nautilus-open-terminal, nautilus-sendto, and nautilus-sendto-empathy; as well as purging, killing nautilus (killall nautilus), starting nautilus, and trying to change permissions without reinstalling those packages. None of this has worked. I have also tried reinstalling (sudo aptitude reinstall ...) nautilus, nautilus-data, nautilus-actions, and nautilus-scripts-manager (then killing and restarting nautilus), but none of this has worked, either. I have checked my fstab configuration, and my / partition (on which /home/dane resides) does not have any unusual mount options. I'll attach this as well. I would REALLY like to get this functionality back (which I had in 9.10). Any suggestions? Need any more information? Thanks for your interest in this bug. ** Attachment added: Screenshot of the problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/195630/+attachment/1731863/+files/Screenshot.png -- Can't change permissions on a folder with nautilus. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195630 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195630] Re: Can't change permissions on a folder with nautilus.
** Attachment added: fstab mentioned in previous post. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/195630/+attachment/1731864/+files/fstab -- Can't change permissions on a folder with nautilus. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195630 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195630] Re: Can't change permissions on a folder with nautilus.
P.S. This nautilus permissions problem happens on my ext3 /media/PERSONAL and NTFS WinVista partitions as well. -- Can't change permissions on a folder with nautilus. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195630 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285063] Re: dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one
Update: I have just upgraded from 9.10 (amd64) to 10.04, and immediately thereafter, to 10.10. I have reconfigured my drives so that the mirror is no longer in any kind of array (dm, or otherwise), but so that there are now 2 separate partitions (one on each drive), labeled PERSONAL and PERSONAL2, respectively. I have removed mdadm and dmraid from my system using 'aptitude remove ...', and the odd drive entry still appears in the Places menu. PERSONAL2 does not show up as 2 drives; there is only one Places entry for it. I have attached a screenshot for illustration. The erroneous entry is positioned to the left of the mouse cursor, and looks like a smooth hard drive. Here is my current /etc/fstab file: [code] # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # Use 'blkid -o value -s UUID' to print the universally unique identifier # for a device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name # devices that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5). # # file system mount point type options dump pass proc/proc procdefaults0 0 # / was on /dev/sda1 during installation UUID=6730efad-369b-40ff-ac3d-85295772bd13 / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1 # swap was on /dev/sda5 during installation UUID=a8e4b372-85bf-452f-b51b-c7a53f2c9e23 noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0 udf,iso9660 user,noauto,exec,utf8 0 0 /dev/fd0/media/floppy0 autorw,user,noauto,exec,sync,utf8 0 0 UUID=00e41414-2b88-47cd-9916-698606d5b2d1 /media/PERSONAL ext3 rw,user,defaults0 2 [/code] It may be worth noting that in /etc/fstab there is an entry for /media/PERSONAL, but not for /media/PERSONAL2. PERSONAL2 is my rdiff- backup mirror drive (not a mirror in the RAID sense), and has the same formatting, but a different UUID, and slightly different directory structure. I hope this helps. Please let me know if you need any more information. Thanks for looking into this bug! ** Attachment added: Screenshot.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devicekit-disks/+bug/285063/+attachment/1731873/+files/Screenshot.png -- dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285063 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285063] Re: dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one
Update (again): I have just tried taking the entry for /media/PERSONAL out of my /etc/fstab (by commenting it out with a '#'), and the erroneous drive entry has disappeared! It would seem that this is a problem with whatever software provides entries for the Places menu not cross- checking its own generated data (however it does that--I'm not a developer...) with /etc/fstab entries. This would seem to indicate that (unless there's some way that I don't know of), one cannot statically mount a non-system partition (like / or swap) without this bug cropping up. Do any of you know a work-around for this? Is it possible (feasible) to fix this bug without too much trouble? Thanks again for your interest in resolving this! -- dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285063 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 601709] Re: Laptop goes to sleep right after plugging/unplugging power cord
Thanks for the continued interest in this bug. The computer that I'm writing about is my wife's school laptop; as such, I can't reload a new operating system on it during the semester (which ends in late December). Do you think it would be sufficient/helpful for me to test it using a live CD or USB drive? It took some tweaking to get Ubuntu to load on this laptop (after Karmic), including some kernel/boot options to make the video not lock up on boot (black screen). I'm pretty sure I can get it to boot and run a test, but I'd first like to know if this method of testing would be helpful. Thanks! -- Laptop goes to sleep right after plugging/unplugging power cord https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479813] Re: Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic)
Sorry for the late reply. I'm just writing to confirm that as of 10.04, the problem seems to have been resolved. I didn't try other versions than what I've mentioned. Thanks for all you do! -- Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479813 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 601709] [NEW] Laptop goes to sleep right after plugging/unplugging power cord
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager I'm using a Dell Inspiron 700m laptop. Whenever I plug in the power cord, and whenever I unplug the power cord, the computer immediately goes to sleep. (I'm pretty sure it's sleep, and not hibernate.) I tried debugging the problem by monitoring the output of the following commands, but nothing appeared to change during the plug/unplug event. upower --monitor=detail upower.log dbus-monitor --session type='signal',interface='org.freedesktop.PowerManagement' dbus- monitor.log These commands were recommended for debugging gnome-power-manager on the g-p-m web site. Here is the output of those commands: upower: Monitoring activity from the power daemon. Press Ctrl+C to cancel. [14:41:20.290] daemon changed: [14:41:29.566] daemon changed: [14:41:52.508] daemon changed: dbus-monitor: signal sender=org.freedesktop.DBus - dest=:1.57 serial=2 path=/org/freedesktop/DBus; interface=org.freedesktop.DBus; member=NameAcquired string :1.57 It may also be worth noting that in order to get this version of Ubuntu (10.04) to work at all on this laptop, it was necessary to create the file, /etc/modprobe.d/i915-kms.conf, and insert the following text: options i915 modeset=1 Without that workaround, the laptop boots up to a blank, unresponsive screen. Ubuntu 8.04 had none of the above problems. Thanks for looking at this bug! You folks are great! ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gnome-power-manager 2.30.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-23.37-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-23-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Jul 4 15:41:22 2010 GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: Unknown GnomeSessionInhibitors: Failed to acquire GnomeSessionSuspendInhibited: Unknown InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100427.1) Lsusb: Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub MachineType: Dell Inc. Inspiron 700m PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available Socket 1: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card Socket 1: no card ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-23-generic root=UUID=96a3f5d5-408d-4a32-ae85-4b799e2ec056 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-power-manager dmi.bios.date: 02/01/05 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies LTD dmi.bios.version: A02 dmi.board.name: Inspiron 700m dmi.board.vendor: DELL SYSTEM dmi.board.version: Rev.A dmi.chassis.type: 8 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLTD:bvrA02:bd02/01/05:svnDellInc.:pnInspiron700m:pvr-1:rvnDELLSYSTEM:rnInspiron700m:rvrRev.A:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: Inspiron 700m dmi.product.version: -1 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Laptop goes to sleep right after plugging/unplugging power cord https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 601709] Re: Laptop goes to sleep right after plugging/unplugging power cord
** Attachment added: i915-kms.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51386710/i915-kms.conf ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51386224/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51386225/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51386226/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DevkitPower.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51386227/DevkitPower.txt ** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51386228/GConfNonDefault.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51386229/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51386230/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51386231/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51386232/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51386233/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51386234/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: gnome-power-bugreport.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51386235/gnome-power-bugreport.txt -- Laptop goes to sleep right after plugging/unplugging power cord https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 601709] Re: Laptop goes to sleep right after plugging/unplugging power cord
While looking for a fix, I ran into this thread that seems to confirm the problem in Ubuntu 9.10: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1339572page=2 -- Laptop goes to sleep right after plugging/unplugging power cord https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 479813] Re: Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic)
Thanks for taking the time to deal with this bug. As soon as my wife's laptop is available to me for testing, I'll let you know if this is still an issue. (This will probably be at the end of the spring semester, or in other words, at the beginning of summer, as she is in grad. school.) Thanks. --Dane Mutters On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Jeremy Foshee jeremy.fos...@canonical.com wrote: Hi DaneM, This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try with the latest development release of Ubuntu? Â ISO CD images are available from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/ . If it remains an issue, could you run the following command from a Terminal (Applications-Accessories-Terminal). Â It will automatically gather and attach updated debug information to this report. apport-collect -p linux 479813 Also, if you could test the latest upstream kernel available that would be great. Â It will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue. Â Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Â Once you've tested the upstream kernel, please remove the 'needs-upstream-testing' tag. Â This can be done by clicking on the yellow pencil icon next to the tag located at the bottom of the bug description and deleting the 'needs-upstream-testing' text. Â Please let us know your results. Thanks in advance. Â Â [This is an automated message. Â Apologies if it has reached you inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.] ** Tags added: needs-kernel-logs ** Tags added: needs-upstream-testing ** Tags added: kj-triage ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Â Â Â Status: New = Incomplete -- Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479813 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479813 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285063] Re: dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one
I am now using the stock Ubuntu kernel for 9.10 (amd64), and the problem still exists. (I have not used a custom kernel since I recently installed this version.) -- dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285063 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285063] Re: dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one
Thanks for taking the time to keep this bug up-to-date. It is still a problem in Ubuntu version 9.10. I can provide more information if you would like me to; just let me know what you would like to know. Thanks again. --Dane ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Invalid = New -- dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285063 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479813] Re: Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic)
** Attachment added: dmesg.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35459578/dmesg.log ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35459579/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35459580/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35459581/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: HalComputerInfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35459582/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35459583/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35459584/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35459585/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35459586/ProcModules.txt -- Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479813 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479813] Re: Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic)
** Attachment added: lspci-vnvn.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35459605/lspci-vnvn.log -- Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479813 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479813] [NEW] Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic)
Public bug reported: uname -a Linux christie-laptop 2.6.28-15-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 9 10:49:34 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux Other information is attached. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=ba228b14-a578-47fc-bf77-f4713b94f531 Lsusb: Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub MachineType: Dell Inc. Inspiron 700m Package: linux-image-2.6.28-15-generic 2.6.28-15.52 ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=6a13a1bf-65e6-41f1-9fdd-0037d84e99d7 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-15.52-generic SourcePackage: linux ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479813 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479813] Re: Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic)
I have downgraded to the previous kernel, and the problem has gone away. The attached information (lspci-vnvn.log, dmesg.log, and version.log) are done on the working kernel. The ubuntu-bug -p linux command was also done on the working kernel. ** Attachment added: version.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35459791/version.log -- Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG stops working after upgrading to kernel 2.6.28-16.55 (generic) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479813 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 28706] Re: need way to specify the lockd port
I found this while searching the mountd man pages: -P portnum or --port portnum Makes mountd listen on port portnum instead of some random port. By default, mountd will listen on the mount/udp port specified in /etc/services, or, if that is undefined, on some arbitrary port number below 1024. (note the CAPITAL P) I looked in /etc/services (on jaunty) and saw this: sunrpc 111/tcp portmapper # RPC 4.0 portmapper sunrpc 111/udp portmapper ... nfs 2049/tcp# Network File System nfs 2049/udp# Network File System Do you think it would wok if you were to open those ports in the firewall (assuming you haven't already)? I think that once the connection is established, the random port number becomes an established/related connection. I could be wrong. It's been a long time since I've messed with all this. -- need way to specify the lockd port https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 28706] Re: need way to specify the lockd port
Excellent post! Thanks for making the how-to, Shane. You may want to consider posting this to the Ubuntu wiki, with a title something like, Making NFS work with Ubuntu-CE-Firewall. That would make it a little easier to find. -- need way to specify the lockd port https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 28706] Re: need way to specify the lockd port
I found this while searching the mountd man pages: -P portnum or --port portnum Makes mountd listen on port portnum instead of some random port. By default, mountd will listen on the mount/udp port specified in /etc/services, or, if that is undefined, on some arbitrary port number below 1024. (note the CAPITAL P) I looked in /etc/services (on jaunty) and saw this: sunrpc 111/tcp portmapper # RPC 4.0 portmapper sunrpc 111/udp portmapper ... nfs 2049/tcp# Network File System nfs 2049/udp# Network File System Do you think it would wok if you were to open those ports in the firewall (assuming you haven't already)? I think that once the connection is established, the random port number becomes an established/related connection. I could be wrong. It's been a long time since I've messed with all this. -- need way to specify the lockd port https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 28706] Re: need way to specify the lockd port
Excellent post! Thanks for making the how-to, Shane. You may want to consider posting this to the Ubuntu wiki, with a title something like, Making NFS work with Ubuntu-CE-Firewall. That would make it a little easier to find. -- need way to specify the lockd port https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 28706] Re: need way to specify the lockd port
Oh, one thing: modules.conf is the wrong file. I meant modprobe.conf. -- need way to specify the lockd port https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 28706] Re: need way to specify the lockd port
ack...AleksanderAdamowski already posted on this. modprobe.conf *should* work, but /etc/modprobe.d/options is probably a better choice. Anyway, I agree that there should be something done about this as per Shane Rice's suggestion. Perhaps edit the config files by default when installing the nfs server package...? -- need way to specify the lockd port https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 28706] Re: need way to specify the lockd port
Oh, one thing: modules.conf is the wrong file. I meant modprobe.conf. -- need way to specify the lockd port https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 28706] Re: need way to specify the lockd port
ack...AleksanderAdamowski already posted on this. modprobe.conf *should* work, but /etc/modprobe.d/options is probably a better choice. Anyway, I agree that there should be something done about this as per Shane Rice's suggestion. Perhaps edit the config files by default when installing the nfs server package...? -- need way to specify the lockd port https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220349] Re: Hardy - nvidia mcp51 ata controller: slow access to SATA and PATA drives
It's been working so well that I had forgotten all about this bug! Mark as closed/fixed. -- Hardy - nvidia mcp51 ata controller: slow access to SATA and PATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220349 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220349] Re: Hardy - nvidia mcp51 ata controller: slow access to SATA and PATA drives
This has been fixed in Jaunty on my machine. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Hardy - nvidia mcp51 ata controller: slow access to SATA and PATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220349 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 329644] Re: Alt-SysReq-K has no effect, or unintended effect (depending on system it is used on)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 303601 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303601 Additional note: I work at a local computer store, and I've remembered to try Alt+Sysrq+k on about 4-5 machines that are booted onto the Hardy live CD at work. (We use that disk for some of our work.) On all of the various machines that I tested (different ages, makes, and models), that key combination works as expected in the TTYs, but not in X. This includes trying Alt+Sysrq+k in both the GDM login screen (after logging out), and in the Gnome session. I don't know if the duplicate status is correct or not... -- Alt-SysReq-K has no effect, or unintended effect (depending on system it is used on) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329644 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303601] Re: REISUB is broken
Confirmed. I am currently booted into the Jaunty Alpha 4 live CD. ctrl+sysrq+k and ctrl+sysrq+reisub have no effect in Gnome. I also tried holding down shift during the key presses, as my sysrq key is on the prtscr key. Thanks for looking into this. -- REISUB is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303601 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 31846] Re: Install CD boots, but only mounts from the first CD drive
This issue seems to not be a problem in the Alpha 4 of the Jaunty live CD (at least not for me). -- Install CD boots, but only mounts from the first CD drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31846 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303601] Re: REISUB is broken
Hello. I made this post on a duplicate bug; I thought it might be useful to post it to this one as well. I have only tried it on my home Desktop computer, a Core 2 Duo machine with an nVidia 9600GT (by Asus) graphics card, using the proprietary nVidia driver; a logitech Cordless Desktop keyboard and (optical) mouse (model Y-RAJ56A, with sysrq on the prtscr key); running Ubuntu 8.10 with all updates (but no backports). I have also tried using the right alt key as altgr instead of the prtscr/sysrq key, as suggested at some sites (which I don't remember what the addresses were or how I got there...). Additionally, I have tried a number of other key combinations, such as leftalt+shift+prtscr/sysrq+k, to no avail. I should note, however, that my TTYs are all functional (F1-F6), and respond as expected to alt+sysrq+R/E/I/S/U/B and alt+sysrq+K. It's only in the Gnome GUI that there is no affect, other than asking the user whether to save a screenshot. :-p I have also tried setting different keyboard models (us105, Logitech Cordless Desktop [and alternate], and Logitech Cordless Desktop Optical), different combinations of alt/win key behavior and compose key position (in systempreferenceskeyboard), mapping print screen/screen shot to different key combinations (in systempreferenceskeyboard shortcuts), and lots of various button mashing. :-) Please let me/us (Michael et al) know if there's any further information that may be of assistance in solving this problem. With ctrl+alt+backspace disappearing in the next release, I think it's going to be important to get this resolved as soon as is reasonably possible. (Please note that I don't mean to put undue pressure on anybody by saying this.) Thanks, Devs, for all your work; you make Ubuntu great! --Dane -- REISUB is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303601 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285063] Re: dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one
Thanks for taking a look at this bug. I am now running Ubuntu version 8.10 64-bit on this system, and the bug still exists. Please let me know if you need any more info. -- dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285063 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 31846] Re: Install CD boots, but only mounts from the first CD drive
I will take another look at this. I recall that when I went to install 8.10 (64-bit) on this system (after a motherboard upgrade, but the drive configuration is constant), I could not install at all from a CD. I don't recall the details of the problem (I'll look into it again), but I ended up having to make a live USB drive to install from instead. I'll keep you posted on this issue, and report a different bug if it appears to be a different problem. -- Install CD boots, but only mounts from the first CD drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31846 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 329644] Re: Alt-SysReq-K has no effect, or unintended effect (depending on system it is used on)
Michael, Thanks for reporting this bug, as it affects me as well. I have only tried it on my home Desktop computer, a Core 2 Duo machine with an nVidia 9600GT (by Asus) graphics card, using the proprietary nVidia driver; a logitech Cordless Desktop keyboard and (optical) mouse (model Y-RAJ56A, with sysrq on the prtscr key); running Ubuntu 8.10 with all updates (but no backports). I have also tried using the right alt key as altgr instead of the prtscr/sysrq key, as suggested at some sites (which I don't remember what the addresses were or how I got there...). Additionally, I have tried a number of other key combinations, such as leftalt+shift+prtscr/sysrq+k, to no avail. I should note, however, that my TTYs are all functional (F1-F6), and respond as expected to alt+sysrq+R/E/I/S/U/B and alt+sysrq+K. It's only in the Gnome GUI that there is no affect, other than asking the user whether to save a screenshot. :-p I have also tried setting different keyboard models (us105, Logitech Cordless Desktop [and alternate], and Logitech Cordless Desktop Optical), different combinations of alt/win key behavior and compose key position (in systempreferenceskeyboard), mapping print screen/screen shot to different key combinations (in systempreferenceskeyboard shortcuts), and lots of various button mashing. :-) Please let me/us (Michael et al) know if there's any further information that may be of assistance in solving this problem. With ctrl+alt+backspace disappearing in the next release, I think it's going to be important to get this resolved as soon as is reasonably possible. (Please note that I don't mean to put undue pressure on anybody by saying this.) Thanks, Devs, for all your work; you make Ubuntu great! --Dane -- Alt-SysReq-K has no effect, or unintended effect (depending on system it is used on) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329644 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 329644] Re: Alt-SysReq-K has no effect, or unintended effect (depending on system it is used on)
jhansonxi, Thanks for the post. I have tried pressing alt+sysreq+reisub, which should shut the system down, but it does nothing while I'm in X/Gnome. If this is a BIOS issue, is there something I can do to fix it? Please let me know if you have any ideas. Thanks. -- Alt-SysReq-K has no effect, or unintended effect (depending on system it is used on) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329644 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285063] [NEW] dmraid mirror in 8.04.1 shows up as three entries in Removable Media - should only show as one
Public bug reported: I have two 500GB hard drives in a software mirror array using nVidia's RAID controller build-into my P7N-SLI Platinum motherboard. /dev/mapper contains the following: [code] crw-rw 1 root root 10, 60 2008-10-17 02:05 control brw-rw 1 root disk 254, 0 2008-10-17 02:05 nvidia_cfffhefc brw-rw 1 root disk 254, 1 2008-10-17 02:05 nvidia_cfffhefc1 [/code] The RAID 1 device is comprised of two drives: [code] brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 16 2008-10-17 02:04 /dev/sdb brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 17 2008-10-17 02:04 /dev/sdb1 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 32 2008-10-17 02:04 /dev/sdc brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 33 2008-10-17 02:04 /dev/sdc1 [/code] Specifically, it's using /dev/sdb1 as the primary drive, and /dev/sdc1 as the secondary drive. I am using a custom kernel due to a bug that I previously reported having to do with slow hard drive access. It's version is '2.6.26.5'. Here's the output of lsmod: [code] Module Size Used by binfmt_misc10316 1 rfcomm 37856 2 l2cap 22272 13 rfcomm bluetooth 57828 4 rfcomm,l2cap vboxdrv 1635872 0 ppdev 8712 0 acpi_cpufreq8208 1 cpufreq_userspace 4388 0 cpufreq_powersave 2752 0 cpufreq_stats 6368 0 cpufreq_conservative 8584 0 cpufreq_ondemand8720 1 freq_table 5568 3 acpi_cpufreq,cpufreq_stats,cpufreq_ondemand video 20500 0 output 4288 1 video sbs14288 0 sbshc 6720 1 sbs container 4672 0 battery13128 0 iptable_filter 3904 0 ip_tables 19600 1 iptable_filter x_tables 23624 1 ip_tables ac 5704 0 coretemp7936 0 f71882fg 12556 0 sbp2 22860 0 lp 11652 0 parport_serial 7936 0 nvidia 8104944 34 parport_pc 35944 2 parport_serial parport40496 3 ppdev,lp,parport_pc psmouse42204 0 serio_raw 6596 0 snd_hda_intel 448084 3 snd_pcm_oss42144 0 snd_mixer_oss 17152 1 snd_pcm_oss snd_pcm85000 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm_oss snd_page_alloc 1 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm snd_hwdep 9032 1 snd_hda_intel snd_seq_oss33088 0 snd_seq_midi7808 0 snd_rawmidi24864 1 snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event 8896 2 snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi snd_seq57184 5 snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi,snd_seq_midi_event joydev 11904 0 snd_timer 23760 2 snd_pcm,snd_seq snd_seq_device 8532 4 snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq button 7968 0 shpchp 33376 0 snd65864 16 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_hwdep,snd_seq_oss,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq,snd_timer,snd_seq_device pci_hotplug30712 1 shpchp evdev 11456 5 i2c_nforce2 7424 0 soundcore 8736 1 snd i2c_core 26016 2 nvidia,i2c_nforce2 ipv6 286536 22 pcspkr 3584 0 ext3 132944 2 jbd48808 1 ext3 mbcache 9668 1 ext3 dm_mirror 18752 1 dm_log 11268 2 dm_mirror dm_mod 60848 7 dm_mirror,dm_log usbhid 30112 0 hid47552 1 usbhid sr_mod 16324 0 cdrom 39208 1 sr_mod sg 35808 0 floppy 62184 0 ohci1394 31604 0 pata_pdc2027x 9988 0 ieee1394 97208 2 sbp2,ohci1394 forcedeth 54160 0 ehci_hcd 36492 0 pata_amd 14084 2 sd_mod 28480 5 ohci_hcd 23556 0 ahci 30472 0 usbcore 157208 4 usbhid,ehci_hcd,ohci_hcd pata_acpi 5760 0 thermal19040 0 processor 37952 2 acpi_cpufreq,thermal fan 5704 0 thermal_sys13120 4 video,thermal,processor,fan fuse 54464 3 fbcon 41728 0 tileblit3584 1 fbcon font9472 1 fbcon bitblit 6464 1 fbcon softcursor 2816 1 bitblit [/code] Restarting dbus via the command, 'sudo /etc/init.d/dbus restart' seems to fix the problem, but makes some other things buggy until I restart the computer. (I don't remember which things get buggy; it's kind-of random.) In Removable Media (Places menu), I have the following entries: Floppy Drive WinVista WinXP 20.5 GB Media PERSONAL (incorrect entry for mirror) PERSONAL (incorrect entry for
[Bug 33620] Re: Floppy icon on desktop will not open
It seems in Hardy that it's not possible to drag the icon from Computer to the Destkop. It gives me this error (in details of the error window): Can't open mountable file. Incidentally, when I went to mount a floppy, the icon in Computer changed to a generic removable drive icon, and the name changed to DP (which is the label of the disk), then the icon changed back to the floppy icon, as one might expect. Oddly enough, though, the icon and the name stayed as the generic icon, and the label stayed DP when the volume was unmounted through the GUI (right-click). This may or may not be a related bug... Anyway, let me know if you need any more input. -- Floppy icon on desktop will not open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33620 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220349] [NEW] Hardy - nvidia mcp51 ata controller: slow access to SATA and PATA drives
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-source I have a MSI P7N-SLI Platinum motherboard. It has an nVidia MCP51 IDE controller, according to `lspci`. This controller, according to google (and the solution I found) is actually 2 controllers: nVidia 430 (MCP) and JMicron JMB363. See this for more details: http://www.nvnews.net/reviews/msi_p7n_platinum/index.shtml Symptoms: -extremely slow optical disk burning -it takes forever to copy, delete, or create large files -tracker is REALLY slow, to the point of being practically useless. I am using Hardy Heron Beta, fully updated, as of April 21, 2008, AMD64 edition, on an Intel Core 2 Duo processor. I have several drives attached directly to the 2 PATA controllers on the motherboard: -primary master: 250GB HD -primary slave: 18X DVDRW drive -sec. master: removable HD bay (various older HDs) -sec. slave: 16X DVDRW drive I have 1 SATA drive connected to the motherboard at SATA channel 2: a 320GB drive. I also have installed a Promise Ultra133 TX2 PATA controller card with 2 PATA channels. Only channel 1 has connected drives: -master: 40GB hard drive -slave: 80GB hard drive The larger drives (250 PATA and 320 SATA) are pretty new; the rest are not, but all drives pass `badblocks -c 4096 -svnb 4096 /dev/xxx` with no errors. Here's the workaround I manged to find: -compile my own kernel based on `apt-get source linux-source-2.6.24`, using the old debian method from the WIKI. Attached are the old (NOT working) config from /boot/, and the new (working) config that I made using `make menuconfig` in the kernel source directory. Note that the sound drivers were, for some reason not set up properly in the original .config (as far as I could tell), but oddly enough, worked out-of-the- box. -blacklist the module, ata_generic in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist. (Added blacklist ata_generic to the last line.) Please let me know if you need some more info, and I'll do my best to give it to you. Thanks for all your work! --Dane ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Hardy - nvidia mcp51 ata controller: slow access to SATA and PATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220349 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220349] Re: Hardy - nvidia mcp51 ata controller: slow access to SATA and PATA drives
** Attachment added: config-2.6.24.3-dane http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13688144/config-2.6.24.3-dane -- Hardy - nvidia mcp51 ata controller: slow access to SATA and PATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220349 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220349] Re: Hardy - nvidia mcp51 ata controller: slow access to SATA and PATA drives
original .config from /boot/ ** Attachment added: config-2.6.24-16-generic http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13688153/config-2.6.24-16-generic -- Hardy - nvidia mcp51 ata controller: slow access to SATA and PATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220349 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98651] Re: Fiesty: updates on 3-29-07 royally messed up fstab
Thanks for your attention to this bug. It's been a while, so I don't have any details to give you about the boot-up at that time, but I do recall that it did boot properly. The main problem (as far as I've figured it out) is that my Promise Ultra133TX2 PCI ATA133 card and my nVidia CK804 rev. f3 SATA controller keep getting their attached hard drives mixed-up. Here's what I mean: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo blkid /dev/hda1: UUID=63f0e2a3-b520-42d8-943b-94e4b4a381b1 TYPE=reiserfs /dev/hda2: UUID=1981f215-6f5b-4d93-9216-55ba82e34427 TYPE=reiserfs /dev/hda3: UUID=c9d191a9-54eb-4a49-a60c-f818818acaa0 TYPE=reiserfs /dev/hda4: UUID=abfe74bc-4a48-496f-9f15-094d868d41fa TYPE=swap /dev/sda1: LABEL=BACKUP UUID=63ed91b2-a8c2-417c-b93f-985bbf1e93fb TYPE=ext2 /dev/hdc1: UUID=ecb2eafe-3009-478f-84bb-70faea5115bc SEC_TYPE=ext2 TYPE=ext3 /dev/hdc5: UUID=877dcd40-e70c-4cec-81fc-bb44dbd81f12 TYPE=swap /dev/sdb1: TYPE=ntfs /dev/sdc1: LABEL=PERSONAL UUID=88813472-f156-4ee6-b8e9-41540ff07486 TYPE=ext2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo mount /dev/hdc1 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro) proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) /sys on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) varrun on /var/run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,mode=0755) varlock on /var/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,mode=1777) procbususb on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw) udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw,mode=0755) devshm on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) lrm on /lib/modules/2.6.20-16-generic/volatile type tmpfs (rw) /dev/hda1 on /media/hda1 type reiserfs (rw) /dev/hda2 on /media/hda2 type reiserfs (rw) /dev/hda3 on /media/hda3 type reiserfs (rw) /dev/sdc1 on /media/sda1 type ext2 (rw) /dev/sda1 on /media/sdb1 type ext2 (rw) /dev/sdb1 on /media/sdc1 type ntfs (rw,nls=utf8,umask=007,gid=46) binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hdc1 18G 16G 1.7G 91% / varrun502M 116K 502M 1% /var/run varlock 502M 0 502M 0% /var/lock procbususb502M 140K 502M 1% /proc/bus/usb udev 502M 140K 502M 1% /dev devshm502M 0 502M 0% /dev/shm lrm 502M 39M 464M 8% /lib/modules/2.6.20-16-generic/volatile /dev/hda1 957M 128M 830M 14% /media/hda1 /dev/hda2 120G 41G 79G 34% /media/hda2 /dev/hda3 113G 107G 6.0G 95% /media/hda3 /dev/sdc1 294G 81G 199G 29% /media/sda1 /dev/sda1 74G 73G 0 100% /media/sdb1 /dev/sdb1 38G 28G 9.4G 76% /media/sdc1 As you can see, /dev/sda1, according to blkid, is an 80GB drive labeled BACKUP, /dev/sdb1 is my 40GB Windows XP installation on NTFS (which, incidentally does not have a UUID, as NTFS usually doesn't), and /dev/sdc1 is a 300GB drive labeled PERSONAL. In the blkid information in my April 4th, 2007 post, the aforementioned drives are as follows: /dev/sdc1: LABEL=PERSONAL UUID=88813472-f156-4ee6-b8e9-41540ff07486 TYPE=ext2 /dev/sdb1: TYPE=ntfs /dev/sda1: LABEL=PERSONAL UUID=88813472-f156-4ee6-b8e9-41540ff07486 TYPE=ext2 /dev/sdb5: LABEL=BACKUP UUID=438E-1221 TYPE=vfat To my recollection, I have not changed any drive configurations since then, although I have switched to a 64-bit version of Ubuntu 7.04 on /dev/hdc1 (via a reinstall). My hardware (cables, jumpers, etc.) has not changed at all. You may also note that the UUIDs of my various partitions (except for hdc) have not changed, as I have not since reformatted or moved them. As for the contradictory mount points, I have configured them to how they (as far as I can tell) should be, which is how they show up in my fully-updated Gentoo installation (as of a week or so ago), which I installed about 1.5 years ago. If I am not mistaken, sda should be my first SCSI/SATA device, which is on my onboard nVidia SATA controller. sdb and sdc should be my first and second drives on my PCI IDE (PATA) card, respectively. Thanks again, and let me know if you need any more information. -- Fiesty: updates on 3-29-07 royally messed up fstab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98651 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119392] The Bug is Back
Hello. I've just run into this bug in Feisty, with kernel 2.6.20-16-generic, and all the latest updates, as of 7-25-07. Here is the error I get when running nautilus-cd-burner in a terminal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ nautilus-cd-burner --source-device=/dev/hdb ** (nautilus-cd-burner:6209): WARNING **: Unable to prepare tracks for burning I am trying to copy a GParted Live CD from /dev/hdb (DVD+/-RW) onto a blank CD in the same drive. I have verified that /dev/hdb is the right drive: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mount /dev/hda2 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro) proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) /sys on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) varrun on /var/run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,mode=0755) varlock on /var/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,mode=1777) procbususb on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw) udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw,mode=0755) devshm on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) lrm on /lib/modules/2.6.20-16-generic/volatile type tmpfs (rw) /dev/hda4 on /media/data type ext2 (rw,sync,grpid) /dev/disk/by-uuid/DE1CB23F1CB2128F on /media/winxp type fuseblk (rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,allow_other,default_permissions,blksize=4096) /dev/sda1 on /media/backup type ext2 (rw,sync,grpid) binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw) /dev/hdb on /media/cdrom0 type iso9660 (ro,noexec,nosuid,nodev) I'll try reinstalling nautilus-cd-burner and let you know how it goes. -- Nautilus won't copy cd, closes unexpectedly at 'create disc image' progress bar window. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119392 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119392] Update
I just reinstalled nautilus-cd-burner using synaptic, and the bug persists with the same error as above. Please let me know if you need more information. --Dane -- Nautilus won't copy cd, closes unexpectedly at 'create disc image' progress bar window. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119392 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 33620] Re: Floppy icon on desktop will not open
OK. I've installed Ubuntu 7.04 onto my laptop, and followed the above reproduction instructions. The bug is still there. It's not as much of an issue, since the floppy icon is now created on the desktop when media is inserted, but still, I find it annoying that the custom-made icon doesn't work. It simply says, unable to mount volume when double- clicked, with or without the media already mounted. Thanks. -- Floppy icon on desktop will not open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33620 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 33620] Re: Floppy icon on desktop will not open
I haven't yet tried Edgy or Feisty on my laptop, where this is a problem. I intend to install Feisty when it's released, and will let you know the results then. Thanks. -- Floppy icon on desktop will not open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33620 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98651] Re: Fiesty: updates on 3-29-07 royally messed up fstab
Yet one more thing: I figured out how to get UUIDs, and I edited my fstab accordingly. Now, upon boot, it seems that the kernel (or whatever) keeps mixing up my devices, even duplicating one of them where another should be. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ blkid /dev/hda1: UUID=63f0e2a3-b520-42d8-943b-94e4b4a381b1 TYPE=reiserfs /dev/hda2: UUID=1981f215-6f5b-4d93-9216-55ba82e34427 TYPE=reiserfs /dev/hda3: UUID=c9d191a9-54eb-4a49-a60c-f818818acaa0 TYPE=reiserfs /dev/hda4: TYPE=swap UUID=abfe74bc-4a48-496f-9f15-094d868d41fa /dev/hdc1: UUID=5cb9b1f1-af20-40ec-a362-f2bd1e64e8c6 SEC_TYPE=ext2 TYPE=ext3 /dev/hdc2: TYPE=swap UUID=0baa44d4-2bdc-4761-960d-5126e9c85217 /dev/sdc1: LABEL=PERSONAL UUID=88813472-f156-4ee6-b8e9-41540ff07486 TYPE=ext2 /dev/sdb1: TYPE=ntfs /dev/sda1: LABEL=PERSONAL UUID=88813472-f156-4ee6-b8e9-41540ff07486 TYPE=ext2 /dev/sdb5: LABEL=BACKUP UUID=438E-1221 TYPE=vfat I hope that helps. Also, Susan, thanks for your bug report. Please make a separate report for it instead of clumping it in with this report; it'll be more likely to be seen that way. -- Fiesty: updates on 3-29-07 royally messed up fstab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98651 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98651] Fiesty: updates on 3-29-07 royally messed up fstab
Public bug reported: I have a lot of hard drives, including an ATA133 add-in card with 2 HDs, onboard ATA133 with 2 HDs, and one SATA HD. Upon updating all my packages to current (as of 3-29-07 at 9am Pacific), my fstab got really messed-up. Below is my fixed fstab, with the Ubuntu-generated lines commented out, and the correct lines beneath them. One should note that while everything did mount under the Ubuntu-generated configuration, all the drive letters for my SATA and ATA133 add-in card (sda1, etc) were wrong (ie the UUIDs appeared to be wrong). # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # file system mount point type options dump pass proc/proc procdefaults0 0 # /dev/hdc1 UUID=5cb9b1f1-af20-40ec-a362-f2bd1e64e8c6 / ext3 defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1 # /dev/hda1 UUID=63f0e2a3-b520-42d8-943b-94e4b4a381b1 /media/hda1 reiserfs defaults 0 2 # /dev/hda2 UUID=1981f215-6f5b-4d93-9216-55ba82e34427 /media/hda2 reiserfs defaults 0 2 # /dev/hda3 UUID=c9d191a9-54eb-4a49-a60c-f818818acaa0 /media/hda3 reiserfs defaults 0 2 # /dev/sda5 #UUID=88813472-f156-4ee6-b8e9-41540ff07486 /media/sda1 ext2defaults 0 2 /dev/sda5 /media/sda5 vfatdefaults,utf8,umask=007,gid=46 0 1 # /dev/sdb5 #UUID=438E-1221 /media/sdb5 vfatdefaults,utf8,umask=007,gid=46 0 1 /dev/sdb1 /media/sdb1 ntfsdefaults,nls=utf8,umask=007,gid=46 0 1 # /dev/sdc1 #UUID=9240E4B240E49DEB /media/sdc1 ntfs defaults,nls=utf8,umask=007,gid=46 0 1 /dev/sdc1 /media/sdc1 ext2defaults0 2 # /dev/hda4 UUID=abfe74bc-4a48-496f-9f15-094d868d41fa noneswapsw 0 0 # /dev/hdc2 UUID=0baa44d4-2bdc-4761-960d-5126e9c85217 noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/hdb/media/cdrom0 udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0 0 /dev/hdd/media/cdrom1 udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0 0 /dev/fd0/media/floppy0 autorw,user,noauto 0 0 Here is the output of mount under the correct configuration: /dev/hdc1 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro) proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) /sys on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) varrun on /var/run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,mode=0755) varlock on /var/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,mode=1777) procbususb on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw) udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw,mode=0755) devshm on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) lrm on /lib/modules/2.6.20-13-generic/volatile type tmpfs (rw) /dev/hda1 on /media/hda1 type reiserfs (rw) /dev/hda2 on /media/hda2 type reiserfs (rw) /dev/hda3 on /media/hda3 type reiserfs (rw) binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw) /dev/sda5 on /media/sda5 type vfat (rw,utf8,umask=007,gid=46) /dev/sdb1 on /media/sdb1 type ntfs (rw,nls=utf8,umask=007,gid=46) /dev/sdc1 on /media/sdc1 type ext2 (rw) Here is the output of df -h under the correct configuration: /dev/hdc1 19G 3.9G 14G 22% / varrun506M 108K 506M 1% /var/run varlock 506M 0 506M 0% /var/lock procbususb506M 144K 506M 1% /proc/bus/usb udev 506M 144K 506M 1% /dev devshm506M 0 506M 0% /dev/shm lrm 506M 28M 479M 6% /lib/modules/2.6.20-13-generic/volatile /dev/hda1 957M 116M 842M 13% /media/hda1 /dev/hda2 120G 36G 84G 30% /media/hda2 /dev/hda3 113G 64G 49G 57% /media/hda3 /dev/sda5 75G 52G 24G 69% /media/sda5 /dev/sdb1 38G 23G 16G 60% /media/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 294G 58G 222G 21% /media/sdc1 ...and the incorrect (Ubuntu-generated) configuration: FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hdc1 19G 3.9G 14G 22% / varrun506M 108K 506M 1% /var/run varlock 506M 0 506M 0% /var/lock procbususb506M 144K 506M 1% /proc/bus/usb udev 506M 144K 506M 1% /dev devshm506M 0 506M 0% /dev/shm lrm 506M 28M 479M 6% /lib/modules/2.6.20-13-generic/volatile /dev/hda1 957M 116M 842M 13% /media/hda1 /dev/hda2 120G 36G 84G 30% /media/hda2 /dev/hda3 113G 64G 49G 57% /media/hda3 /dev/sdc1 294G 58G 222G 21% /media/sda1 /dev/sda5 75G 52G 24G 69% /media/sdb5 /dev/sdb1 38G 23G 16G 60% /media/sdc1 I'm not sure how to get the UUID of a hard drive, but if somebody tells me how, I'll post that too. Good luck! ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Fiesty: updates on 3-29-07 royally messed up fstab https://launchpad.net/bugs/98651
[Bug 98651] Re: Fiesty: updates on 3-29-07 royally messed up fstab
One more thing: Before this update, I believe that my HDs on the add-in card were seen as /dev/hdx, like they are in my Gentoo installation on a different partition. -- Fiesty: updates on 3-29-07 royally messed up fstab https://launchpad.net/bugs/98651 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87671] [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel I was running the update tool at the time. It was in the process of installing a whole bunch (around 266) updates. ProblemType: Crash Date: Sat Feb 24 14:02:05 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-panel Package: gnome-panel 2.17.91-0ubuntu1 ProcCmdline: gnome-panel --sm-client-id 117f0001010001172346726010448 --screen 0 ProcCwd: /home/dane ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: gnome-panel StacktraceTop: ?? () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 ?? () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 ?? () __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt () Uname: Linux Orchestrator 2.6.20-8-generic #2 SMP Tue Feb 13 05:18:42 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt() https://launchpad.net/bugs/87671 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 87671] Re: [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt()
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://librarian.launchpad.net/6526113/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6526114/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6526115/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6526116/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6526117/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6526118/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6526119/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6526120/ThreadStacktrace.txt -- [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt() https://launchpad.net/bugs/87671 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 33620] Re: Floppy icon on desktop will not open
I am using Dapper Drake. I still have this problem, though it has changed somewhat since I made this report. Now when I insert a floppy into the USB drive, it will automount and open it, which is very nice. However, when I go to open it again (having first closed the window that came up showing the files) using the icon I created on the desktop (not the one that it auto-created), it gives me this error: Unable to mount the selected floppy drive. error: /dev/sda is already mounted to /media/floppy error: could not execute pmount If I click on the auto-created icon it works fine, but if I unmount (eject) the volume and then click on the icon that I made, it will mount it again, creating another icon, and then not open a window with the files on the drive. Repeated clicking on the homemade icon produces the error above. Clicking on the auto-created icon opens up a window showing the files. Since an icon is now created on the desktop when a floppy is inserted, this is not such a problem for me; it's really just an annoyance that I can't have a floppy icon always on the desktop for mounting/unmounting the volume at will instead of having to remove/insert the disk. Thanks for taking notice of this bug report! I hope it's an easy one to fix. :-) -- Floppy icon on desktop will not open https://launchpad.net/bugs/33620 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 41839] Re: Start-up scripts fail to bind ports; must do it manually after boot.(Dapper)
You're right. I think I was just doing it wrong. Thanks for following up. -- Start-up scripts fail to bind ports; must do it manually after boot.(Dapper) https://launchpad.net/bugs/41839 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52164] Dapper: CDROM ejects itself while playing an audio CD; Sound Juicer freezes
Public bug reported: When I insert and play an audio CD in Dapper (installed in oem mode from the Alternative CD), within about 5 minutes the drive will spontaneously eject, stopping the playback (obviously) and freezing Sound-Juicer. This also happens in RhythmBox, except that it doesn't freeze; it just ejects for no apparent reason. To reproduce: 1) Insert a CD (I tried Jimi Hendrix Blues and Miles Davis Blue Miles) 2) Click play in Sound Juicer ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Dapper: CDROM ejects itself while playing an audio CD; Sound Juicer freezes https://launchpad.net/bugs/52164 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52164] Re: Dapper: CDROM ejects itself while playing an audio CD; Sound Juicer freezes
One more thing: I have tried this with both a DVDROM and a CDROM in the same computer (which is a Gateway , Pentium 3 800), using /dev/hdc and /dev/hdd, respectively. -- Dapper: CDROM ejects itself while playing an audio CD; Sound Juicer freezes https://launchpad.net/bugs/52164 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
