[Bug 786553] [NEW] package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso nuovo script pre-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: msttcorefonts un'applicazione non รจ stata installata correttamente ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat May 21 16:41:14 2011 ErrorMessage: il sottoprocesso nuovo script pre-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1) SourcePackage: msttcorefonts Title: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso nuovo script pre-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786553 Title: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso nuovo script pre-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786553] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso nuovo script pre-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786553 Title: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso nuovo script pre-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600950] Re: nut-snmp cannot talk to netvision ups because of upstream bug
I don't know if this is what you're looking for, but here's the message they sent me via their mailing list: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut- upsuser/2010-July/006083.html -- nut-snmp cannot talk to netvision ups because of upstream bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600950 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600950] [NEW] nut-snmp cannot talk to netvision ups because of upstream bug
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut The current release of nut-snmp driver released with lucid is unable to talk to netvision upses because of a known (to nut devs) bug which is corrected in their development release. This is the patch that corrects the bug: http://boxster.ghz.cc/projects/nut/changeset/2367 ** Affects: nut (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- nut-snmp cannot talk to netvision ups because of upstream bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600950 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 600950] [NEW] nut-snmp cannot talk to netvision ups because of upstream bug
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut The current release of nut-snmp driver released with lucid is unable to talk to netvision upses because of a known (to nut devs) bug which is corrected in their development release. This is the patch that corrects the bug: http://boxster.ghz.cc/projects/nut/changeset/2367 ** Affects: nut (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- nut-snmp cannot talk to netvision ups because of upstream bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600950 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369081] [NEW] KPackageKit doesn't install virtualbox nor acrobat reader
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kpackagekit I had to install both VirtualBox and Acrobat reader which come in isolated .deb files (I mean I didn't setup repos for them, just used the .debs downloaded from the sites with firefox). Opening them from the desktop spawned kpackagekit installer correctly, but both failed with a pretty generic error. Launching manually from a shell, I got this: pa...@lino:~$ kpackagekit Scrivania/virtualbox-2.2_2.2.2-46594_Ubuntu_jaunty_i386.deb isFIle pa...@lino:~$ New transaction with tid /21_daedaaad_data KPackageKit(5463) KpkIcons::actionIcon: action unrecognised: 9 enumFromString ( State ) : converted to , enum value -1 KPackageKit(5463) KpkTransaction::errorCode: errorCode: 3 Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/packagekit/daemonBackend.py, line 109, in run threading.Thread.run(self) File /usr/lib/python2.6/threading.py, line 477, in run self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs) File /usr/lib/packagekit/aptDBUSBackend.py, line 168, in wrapper func(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/packagekit/aptDBUSBackend.py, line 1263, in doInstallFiles if not deb.checkDeb(): File /usr/lib/packagekit/debfile.py, line 365, in checkDeb if not self.checkConflicts(): File /usr/lib/packagekit/debfile.py, line 313, in checkConflicts if self._checkConflictsOrGroup(or_group): File /usr/lib/packagekit/debfile.py, line 197, in _checkConflictsOrGroup if self.pkgName == pkg.name: AttributeError: 'DebPackage' object has no attribute 'pkgName' KPackageKit(5463) KpkTransaction::finished: Failed. KPackageKit(5463) KpkTransaction::finished: Yep, we failed. KPackageKit(5463) KpkInstallFiles::installFilesFinished: Finished. removing transaction from pool : /21_daedaaad_data Kubuntu version: Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 kpackagekit: Installato: 0.4-0ubuntu8 Candidato: 0.4-0ubuntu8 Tabella versione: *** 0.4-0ubuntu8 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: kpackagekit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- KPackageKit doesn't install virtualbox nor acrobat reader https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271622] Re: keyboard shortcut for Application Launcher in kde 4 stopped working
Happened to me after an update, some days ago. At home, it happened just the same. Deleting the .kde directory in my home dir solved the problem. I cannot do this at work because I have set up many options and I would have to do it all over again... -- keyboard shortcut for Application Launcher in kde 4 stopped working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271622 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271202] Re: Intrepid alpha: cd interaction between hal, grip, and eject
Same thing happens also in Kubuntu with kde4. Every time I eject a cdrom, it closes itself right back. Pushing the eject button again, it stays open. -- Intrepid alpha: cd interaction between hal, grip, and eject https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271202 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 281193] Re: manual setup don't work in knetworkmanager if dhcp server is present
Just wanted to add that, with today apt-get update/upgrade, networkmanager and knetworkmanager seem to have a much better behaviour. They seem to have understood what I was trying to do and now it marked my eth0 as Unmanaged with a Manual IP address. I'm a happy man! -- manual setup don't work in knetworkmanager if dhcp server is present https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281193 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185913] Re: Dolphin file manager forget window size
I solved this problem by creating a simple rule in the Windows Behaviour, under System settings. I simply set, for any type of normal window, to remeber the size. It works well, but I think this should be the standard behaviour. Maybe it's possible to put a similar rule in the standard kde default settings for Kubuntu? -- Dolphin file manager forget window size https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185913 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdelibs in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 281193] [NEW] manual setup don't work in knetworkmanager if dhcp server is present
Public bug reported: Release: kubuntu intrepid beta I have a dhcp network with a range set up. If I leave it to work like that, everything is fine. However, for security reasons, everyone that gets an IP from dhcp doesn't have internet access per dhcp server config. My workstation is not supposed to get the ip from dhcp. I am putting in a manual config for this purpose, but knetworkmanager would not set it up. Even after I declared my network manually, I see it in the menu, but clicking it doesn't do anything, and my IP address remains on the one set by the DHCP server. I used to have problems doing this even on hardy, but managed to solve it by editing /etc/network/interfaces manually. This workaround doesn't work anymore, as the address gets reassigned anyway by networkmanager, so I had to disable the service entirely. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- manual setup don't work in knetworkmanager if dhcp server is present https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281193 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 147623] Re: [EM64T]When booting, screen stays black.
I think we must all be very very careful here. We have two very distinct problems which show themselves with similar behaviour. But, they're separated and must remain that way. 32 bit Ubuntu, within a particular (unknown??) set of circumstances (hw config maybe) screwes up the usplash resolution, resulting in black screen and slow boot times. But 64 bits Ubuntu, which we are discussing here, has a completely different matter. Still a black screen, but boot time is normal. The first is caused by a problem whithin the installation (wrong res) followed by a problem in vesafb-tng, which when set to the wrong res, takes ages to boot. It shouldn't do that, IMHO. The second is caused, as I was saying before, by completely missing vesa driver in 64 bit linux that works with recent cards. I really want to be precise, because I've seen many times the two problems blending together and generating much confusion. Thanks anyway! -- [EM64T]When booting, screen stays black. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 147623] Re: [EM64T]When booting, screen stays black.
Ok, I think I got what the problem is. And, unfortunately, I think the solution is out of reach, at least for me. It seems we x86_64 are simply short of a usable working vesa module! That's right, because: vesafb doesn't work with newer cards. The fact that with x86 it works, it's because it is, in reality, vesafb-tng, the newer release, which of course isn't availabe on x86_64. nvidiafb or ati equivalent doesn't work because thay won't work with the proprietary driver. There is an alternative: uvesafb (http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/uvesafb/), which is the evolution of vesafb-tng. It works on every architecture and it's completely userland. It needs a kernel patch, though, and offer also some new features, like VESA 3.0 compatibility. If Ubuntu's folks can implement uvesafb, we should be set! ;) -- [EM64T]When booting, screen stays black. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 146145] Re: Can't recive files from cell phone
Ok, that's good to know. However, switching to Hardy just to fix kdebluetooth seems a little too much for me. Any chances of a backport? Thanks! -- Can't recive files from cell phone https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 156341] Re: ubuntu 7.10 and ATI = black screen?
It can't possibly be the X server, not right after the bootloader countdown! I've seen the exact same behaviour with a notebook here. Try this: press escape during countdown to access the grub boot menu. Keeping the default kernel selected, press E to enter edit mode, jump on the line starting with kernel and press E again to edit that line. Finally, from the end of the line, remove quiet and splash parameters. Press ENTER and then B to boot. You will boot in text mode and if your situation is like mine, all should start ok. What I think happens here is that during installation, a wrong graphic mode is selected for the boot process. The boot is also really really slow, but is extremely fast when using this trick. -- ubuntu 7.10 and ATI = black screen? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 156341] Re: ubuntu 7.10 and ATI = black screen?
This seems a duplicate of #155711. Try that solution also. -- ubuntu 7.10 and ATI = black screen? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47649] Re: Landscape PDF printed as portrait (and truncated)
What release of acroread? With the 8.1 from adobe site, I agree with you. But the 7 release from medibuntu, it works for me. Maybe you can try that. -- Landscape PDF printed as portrait (and truncated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47649] Re: Landscape PDF printed as portrait (and truncated)
Just a little clarification of my point of view. I appreciate all the suggestion aimed at resolving my problem. I really appreciate the (k)ubuntu community. What I would like to see regarding this bug is, however, a solution to the underlaying problem. What I see instead is trying to find an app which can circumvent it. Who knows if maybe in the future the problems gets worse and I cannot print anymore with my kubuntu install? I would really like to avoid that. And, moreover, I'm puzzled and worries about the selection of some packages release, like ghostscript being an svn snapshot into what should be a stable release. That is probably also the root of the problem itself. When you look at Debian sid, which is all but a stable platform, and you see it's a few releases _behind_, you really start to wonder if the choice was sound. When the aim of (k)ubuntu is, among other things, stability itself, I wonder even more. Sorry for the little venting. I only want to be clear. -- Landscape PDF printed as portrait (and truncated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47649] Re: Landscape PDF printed as portrait (and truncated)
Well, one day (less actually) away from 7.10 release, and this bug it's still there. Shame. Fortunately, I came up with a solution: using acrobat reader 7 from the medibuntu repository does work. It's the only pdf viewer which prints landscape documents correctly in kubuntu 7.10. I can also add that ubuntu rc 7.10 shows the same disfunction. One question: is it really necessary to use svn quality software in a release, like what's happening with ghostscript? Hell, even Debian sid is not using it... -- Landscape PDF printed as portrait (and truncated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47649] Re: Landscape PDF printed as portrait (and truncated)
Apparently, even the document viewer in ubuntu prints correctly. So, it appears that if the viewer is intelligent enough to rotate the document before sending it out to print, it's all ok, but if the viewer relies on ghostscript to do the work (like kpdf, acroread v8 and even plain lpr do, I suppose), the prints gets screwed up. This is as far as I could go. I hope to have given enough data to work with. -- Landscape PDF printed as portrait (and truncated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47649] Re: Landscape PDF printed as portrait (and truncated)
Just to add some fresh info on the subject: In current Gutsy, the problem is still present. In addition, all PDF related applications seems to have the same problem. I tried kpdf as well as Acrobat reader and even printing a pdf from the command line using lpr. All have the same behaviour of printing in portrait mode and with the truncated output. lpr prints in landscape when passing the -o landscape command line option, but the printing is useless anyway because the margins are way off. I can confirm that the pdf attached by Luke (booking_form_2006.pdf) still works flawlessly. -- Landscape PDF printed as portrait (and truncated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47649] Re: Landscape PDF printed as portrait (and truncated)
Another thing: the unofficial package of kpdf mentioned by Daniel Frein, compiled without poppler dependency, still works. I think, before Gutsy gets released, something has to be done here. Maybe excluding poppler completely. What's its use, anyway? -- Landscape PDF printed as portrait (and truncated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47649] Re: Landscape PDF printed as portrait (and truncated)
I made some further tests. The problem seems a little bit more complex than I thought. To avoid wrong conclusion, I simply report here the tests I've done: Using a .ps produced with the gutsy repos kpdf, on a debian etch machine the file opens correctly in kghostview and also prints correctly. This would seem to indicate the .ps file gets generated correctly, _even_ with poppler involved. Kghostview on gutsy, otoh, displays only half picture, exactly matching the printing problem. Gv, on gutsy, displays the file correctly. I hope someone can come up with something. If I had to take a guess, I would point my finger to ghostscript, which is currently an svn snapshot in gutsy. -- Landscape PDF printed as portrait (and truncated) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 130294] Re: Manage Repositories performs fetch updates
I had this same behaviour this morining when upgrading Gutsy. I think I found a way to restore the original behaviour, and even a possible cause, although very strange. This morning update got interrupted because a file couldn't be downloaded. The update I thought it was finished instead never got completed, and the other new packages were never really installed. In this situation, I had the behaviour descripted in the bug. As soon as I did a apt-get -f install from a console, and let all the packages to install, thus terminating the interrupted upgrade process, adept restarted to work normally. I have to say that, in the past, it already happened to have quite strange behaviours from adept, when installation of packages dont go as planned. It seems it is completely unable to handle interrupted install process, and gets all sorts of strange behaviour if this situation occurs. -- Manage Repositories performs fetch updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
