[Bug 1232354] Re: Crash when dragging bookmark in Firefox
I originally reported this issue but can no longer reproduce it ** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232354 Title: Crash when dragging bookmark in Firefox To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1232354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252365] Re: mdadm does not add spares to arrays on boot
Many years later I can no longer reproduce this ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252365 Title: mdadm does not add spares to arrays on boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/initramfs-tools/+bug/252365/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858317] Re: man mdadm does not document the --offroot option
Evidence that --offroot is being used by systemd during boot: Jan 04 10:26:22 dracor systemd-udevd[430]: Process '/sbin/mdadm --incremental /dev/sdc1 --offroot' failed with exit code 1. Jan 04 10:26:22 dracor systemd-udevd[428]: Process '/sbin/mdadm --incremental /dev/sdb1 --offroot' failed with exit code 1. Jan 04 10:26:22 dracor systemd-udevd[432]: Process '/sbin/mdadm --incremental /dev/sde1 --offroot' failed with exit code 1. Jan 04 10:26:32 dracor mdadm[1191]: * Starting MD monitoring service mdadm --monitor Jan 04 10:26:32 dracor mdadm[1191]:...done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858317 Title: man mdadm does not document the --offroot option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1858317/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858317] Re: man mdadm does not document the --offroot option
I experienced and reported this issue on Ubuntu 16.04, but have now verified that it also affects Ubuntu 18.04.3. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858317 Title: man mdadm does not document the --offroot option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1858317/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858317] [NEW] man mdadm does not document the --offroot option
Public bug reported: I can see in the logs that systemd incrementally assembles mdadm arrays using the --incremental and --offroot options, yet the --offroot option is not documented in the mdadm manpage. I can see it here though: https://linux.die.net/man/8/mdadm ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: mdadm 3.3-2ubuntu7.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-72.81~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-72-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.21 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jan 5 09:07:20 2020 InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-04-27 (617 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20180228) MDadmExamine.dev.sda: Error: command ['/sbin/mdadm', '-E', '/dev/sda'] failed with exit code 1: mdadm: cannot open /dev/sda: Permission denied MDadmExamine.dev.sdb: Error: command ['/sbin/mdadm', '-E', '/dev/sdb'] failed with exit code 1: mdadm: cannot open /dev/sdb: Permission denied MDadmExamine.dev.sdb1: Error: command ['/sbin/mdadm', '-E', '/dev/sdb1'] failed with exit code 1: mdadm: cannot open /dev/sdb1: Permission denied MDadmExamine.dev.sdc: Error: command ['/sbin/mdadm', '-E', '/dev/sdc'] failed with exit code 1: mdadm: cannot open /dev/sdc: Permission denied MDadmExamine.dev.sdc1: Error: command ['/sbin/mdadm', '-E', '/dev/sdc1'] failed with exit code 1: mdadm: cannot open /dev/sdc1: Permission denied MDadmExamine.dev.sdd: Error: command ['/sbin/mdadm', '-E', '/dev/sdd'] failed with exit code 1: mdadm: cannot open /dev/sdd: Permission denied MDadmExamine.dev.sde: Error: command ['/sbin/mdadm', '-E', '/dev/sde'] failed with exit code 1: mdadm: cannot open /dev/sde: Permission denied MDadmExamine.dev.sde1: Error: command ['/sbin/mdadm', '-E', '/dev/sde1'] failed with exit code 1: mdadm: cannot open /dev/sde1: Permission denied MDadmExamine.dev.sde2: Error: command ['/sbin/mdadm', '-E', '/dev/sde2'] failed with exit code 1: mdadm: cannot open /dev/sde2: Permission denied MDadmExamine.dev.sdf: Error: command ['/sbin/mdadm', '-E', '/dev/sdf'] failed with exit code 1: mdadm: cannot open /dev/sdf: Permission denied MDadmExamine.dev.sdg: Error: command ['/sbin/mdadm', '-E', '/dev/sdg'] failed with exit code 1: mdadm: cannot open /dev/sdg: Permission denied MachineType: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M. ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-72-generic root=UUID=2a39e062-c0b5-4227-90f3-8f0c9169986d ro quiet i915.alpha_support=1i fsck.repair=yes SourcePackage: mdadm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 03/27/2019 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: P4.00 dmi.board.name: Z370M-ITX/ac dmi.board.vendor: ASRock dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrP4.00:bd03/27/2019:svnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:rvnASRock:rnZ370M-ITX/ac:rvr:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.: dmi.product.family: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.product.name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.product.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.sys.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M. etc.blkid.tab: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/blkid.tab' ** Affects: mdadm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858317 Title: man mdadm does not document the --offroot option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1858317/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1021699] Re: fetchmail: IDLE - multiple daemons should be started
Here is a way (untested by me) to do what Andreas suggests: https://marek.dopiera.pl/2018/10/03/fetchmail-imap-idle-systemd- generators/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021699 Title: fetchmail: IDLE - multiple daemons should be started To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fetchmail/+bug/1021699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1855296] Re: Kernel regression: pvrusb2 tuners do not come online in 4.15.0-72
A few days in I have now had a chance to reboot this machine once more into the -72 kernel, and I was unable to reproduce the issue. ** Changed in: linux-signed-hwe (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855296 Title: Kernel regression: pvrusb2 tuners do not come online in 4.15.0-72 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe/+bug/1855296/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1855296] [NEW] Kernel regression: pvrusb2 tuners do not come online in 4.15.0-72
Public bug reported: Following the linux 4.15.0-72-generic kernel update my Hauppauge 1950 tuners no longer work. This is a production machine, so I did not have time to troubleshoot and had to quickly recover by rebooting into the previous kernel version (which is 4.15.0-70). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: linux-image-4.15.0-70-generic 4.15.0-70.79~16.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-70.79~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-70-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.21 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Dec 5 16:02:15 2019 InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-04-27 (587 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20180228) SourcePackage: linux-signed-hwe UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: linux-signed-hwe (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855296 Title: Kernel regression: pvrusb2 tuners do not come online in 4.15.0-72 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe/+bug/1855296/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1648846] Re: Chromium ignores no_proxy environment variable
I cannot reproduce the issue at present. But it's strange that I encountered a problem in 2016 which was fixed upstream in 2009. Anyway, let's close this for now. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648846 Title: Chromium ignores no_proxy environment variable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1648846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1744995] [NEW] Spectre kernel update crashes hard
Public bug reported: This kernel update crashes my old machine (Intel Core i3-540, H55 chipset) solid on boot. It needs to be powercycled. Selecting the previous kernel (3.13.0-139) in grub revives the machine. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: linux-image-3.13.0-141-generic 3.13.0-141.190 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-139.188-generic 3.13.11-ckt39 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-139-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.27 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: frontend 1899 F pulseaudio frontend 2223 F mythfrontend.re /dev/snd/pcmC0D7p: frontend 2223 F...m mythfrontend.re Date: Tue Jan 23 19:36:39 2018 IwConfig: eth0 no wireless extensions. lono wireless extensions. MachineType: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M. ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-139-generic root=UUID=258c1c48-dd3b-4e07-bc84-bdd38da7699d ro enable_mtrr_cleanup mtrr_spare_reg_nr=1 ipv6.disable=1 splash quiet PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-139-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-139-generic N/A linux-firmware 1.127.24 RfKill: SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2017-01-29 (359 days ago) WifiSyslog: dmi.bios.date: 07/22/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 080015 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.board.vendor: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.board.version: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr080015:bd07/22/2010:svnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:rvnTobefilledbyO.E.M.:rnTobefilledbyO.E.M.:rvrTobefilledbyO.E.M.:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.: dmi.product.name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.product.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.sys.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744995 Title: Spectre kernel update crashes hard To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1744995/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1627114] Re: WiFi is not detected for Intel Dual BandWireless-AC 3168
I know that this is an old ticket etc, but: I also have this card and use it in a laptop that's running Ubuntu 16.04. Meanwhile it's 16.04.3 rather than .1, but that's by the by. The card works fine for me using the Hardware Enablement kernel. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack On that basis I will mark this bug as Fix Released. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627114 Title: WiFi is not detected for Intel Dual BandWireless-AC 3168 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1627114/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1648846] [NEW] Chromium ignores no_proxy environment variable
Public bug reported: I need the proxy to be bypassed for a number of sites. These sites are listed in the no_proxy environment variable. However, this is ignored by Chromium. There does not appear to be any way in Chromium (nor in the system proxy settings) to specify sites for which the proxy should be bypassed. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: chromium-browser 53.0.2785.143-0ubuntu0.16.04.1.1257 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-53.74-generic 4.4.30 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-53-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: GNOME-Flashback:Unity DRM.card0-DP-1: edid-base64: dpms: Off modes: enabled: disabled status: disconnected DRM.card0-HDMI-A-1: edid-base64: dpms: Off modes: enabled: disabled status: disconnected DRM.card0-LVDS-1: edid-base64: AP///wAGr54TAAETAQOAJhV4CsSVnldTkiYPUFQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHCpAbmGEDDAwIDYAftYQAAAYDwAg/gBBVU8KICAgICAgICAg/gBCMTczUlcwMSBWMyAKACQ= dpms: On modes: 1600x900 enabled: enabled status: connected DRM.card0-VGA-1: edid-base64: dpms: Off modes: enabled: disabled status: disconnected Date: Fri Dec 9 17:23:04 2016 Desktop-Session: 'gnome-flashback-compiz' '/etc/xdg/xdg-gnome-flashback-compiz:/usr/share/upstart/xdg:/etc/xdg' '/usr/share/gnome-flashback-compiz:/usr/local/share/:/usr/share/:/var/lib/snapd/desktop' DetectedPlugins: Env: 'None' 'None' InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-12-07 (732 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140722.2) Load-Avg-1min: 1.11 Load-Processes-Running-Percent: 0.1% MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-53-generic root=UUID=9a82200b-b3aa-44b6-b217-8db2a403850f ro ipv6.disable=1 quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: chromium-browser UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2016-04-24 (229 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 05/21/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.bios.version: F.19 dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: 1803 dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.board.version: 10.59 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Chassis Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrF.19:bd05/21/2012:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPPaviliondv7NotebookPC:pvr06902120471620100:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn1803:rvr10.59:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: HP Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC dmi.product.version: 06902120471620100 dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard etcconfigcpepperflashpluginnonfree: flashso="/usr/lib/pepperflashplugin-nonfree/libpepflashplayer.so" flashversion=`strings $flashso 2> /dev/null | grep LNX | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sed -e "s/,/./g"` CHROMIUM_FLAGS="$CHROMIUM_FLAGS --ppapi-flash-path=$flashso --ppapi-flash-version=$flashversion" gconf-keys: /desktop/gnome/applications/browser/exec = b'firefox\n'/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/https/command = b'sensible-browser %s\n'/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/https/enabled = b'true\n'/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/http/command = b'sensible-browser %s\n'/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/http/enabled = b'true\n'/desktop/gnome/session/required_components/windowmanager = b''/apps/metacity/general/compositing_manager = b''/desktop/gnome/interface/icon_theme = b'gnome\n'/desktop/gnome/interface/gtk_theme = b'Clearlooks\n' modified.conffile..etc.default.chromium-browser: [deleted] mtime.conffile..etc.chromium-browser.default: 2016-04-24T14:29:37.993623 ** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648846 Title: Chromium ignores no_proxy environment variable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1648846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1575248] Re: "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." on "sudo apt-get update"
# fwupdmgr refresh Failed to download https://s3.amazonaws.com/lvfsbucket/downloads/firmware.xml.gz.asc: SSL handshake failed Yet that link works in a browser. Related? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248 Title: "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." on "sudo apt-get update" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/appstream/+bug/1575248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1634572] Re: APCUPSD does not send killpower command to UPS (only happens on Ubuntu 16.04)
According to discussion on the apcupsd-users mailing list [1] this issue is OS-specific rather than being a problem in upstream apcupsd. Specifically it is believed that this issue is due to Ubuntu shutting down USB before the killpower command is issued to the UPS, which which it is no longer possible to communicate without USB. [1]: https://marc.info/?t=14760647901=1=2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634572 Title: APCUPSD does not send killpower command to UPS (only happens on Ubuntu 16.04) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apcupsd/+bug/1634572/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443590] Re: Not updated to latest upstream
** Description changed: - I am filing the same bug against Ubuntu as Alec Leamas (lirc maintainer) - did against Debian: + I am filing the same bug against Ubuntu as Alec Leamas (upstream lirc + maintainer) did against Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777199 ===begin=== - The lirc sources used (0.9.0-pre1) is now very old (2011), lagging two + The lirc sources used (0.9.0-pre1) is now very old (2011), lagging two major and several minor releases behind upstream. - I'm filing this in my capacity as the upstream maintainer. The very old - sources used by Debian are becoming a problem also for us, since it - makes a substantial part of the user base using sources we don't + I'm filing this in my capacity as the upstream maintainer. The very old + sources used by Debian are becoming a problem also for us, since it + makes a substantial part of the user base using sources we don't maintain any more. - I'm perfectly aware that the decision to update, to what and when, is up - to the Debian maintainers. That said, if I as the upstream could make + I'm perfectly aware that the decision to update, to what and when, is up + to the Debian maintainers. That said, if I as the upstream could make anything to make an update easier, please let me know. - --alec leamas ===end=== ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #777199 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777199 ** Also affects: lirc via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777199 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443590 Title: Not updated to latest upstream To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lirc/+bug/1443590/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1443590] [NEW] Not updated to latest upstream
Public bug reported: I am filing the same bug against Ubuntu as Alec Leamas (lirc maintainer) did against Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777199 ===begin=== The lirc sources used (0.9.0-pre1) is now very old (2011), lagging two major and several minor releases behind upstream. I'm filing this in my capacity as the upstream maintainer. The very old sources used by Debian are becoming a problem also for us, since it makes a substantial part of the user base using sources we don't maintain any more. I'm perfectly aware that the decision to update, to what and when, is up to the Debian maintainers. That said, if I as the upstream could make anything to make an update easier, please let me know. --alec leamas ===end=== ** Affects: lirc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443590 Title: Not updated to latest upstream To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1443590/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 827669] Re: [138a:0018] Validity Sensors fingerprint reader not recognized
On 09/07/2014 12:38 PM, Ruben Rocha wrote: Hi guys On 12.04 it is a bit tricky for the driver to install ok because the one on the fprint repo replaces the one of the deb package. Try this: sudo apt-get remove libfprint0 install the deb again sudo apt-get install fprintd libpam-fprintd I think that you need to install the deb package first and then install the other files from the fprint repo. Reboot and try to install the deb package again. Hi Ruben, Thanks for your efforts. When I follow your instructions, on 12.04.5, I get the following when trying to start fprint_demo: fprint_demo: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.17' not found (required by /usr/local/lib/libfprint.so.0) So it seems that the libfprint from the fprint repo has not been compiled for 12.04 which carries glibc 2.15. So I'm afraid that this still isn't working on the current LTS. Cheers, Jan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827669 Title: [138a:0018] Validity Sensors fingerprint reader not recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libfprint/+bug/827669/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd
According to [1], the fix is to ensure that the ppstools package is installed on the system used to build the ntp package, as that is the package that provides the timepps header file that the ntpd build system needs in order to enable pps support. [1]: http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2014-April/037913.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826873 Title: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/826873/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd
According to [1], the fix is to ensure that the ppstools package is installed on the system used to build the ntp package, as that is the package that provides the timepps header file that the ntpd build system needs in order to enable pps support. [1]: http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2014-April/037913.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826873 Title: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/826873/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 827669] Re: [138a:0018] Validity Sensors fingerprint reader not recognized
Thank you very much. This package however requires glibc 2.17 whereas my 12.04.4 LTS system only has 2.15. Would you be able to make available a package that works on the other currently supported Ubuntu versions? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827669 Title: [138a:0018] Validity Sensors fingerprint reader not recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libfprint/+bug/827669/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1232354] Re: Crash when dragging bookmark in Firefox
Actually, the crash happens when anything is dragged in Firefox: - attempt at reconfiguring the toolbars - dragging a link - ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232354 Title: Crash when dragging bookmark in Firefox To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1232354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1232354] [NEW] Crash when dragging bookmark in Firefox
Public bug reported: When I try and drag a bookmark on Firefox's bookmarks toolbar, lightdm crashes and I'm taken back to the login screen. janc@mordor:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS Release:12.04 janc@mordor:~$ apt-cache policy lightdm lightdm: Installed: 1.2.3-0ubuntu2.3 Candidate: 1.2.3-0ubuntu2.3 Version table: *** 1.2.3-0ubuntu2.3 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages janc@mordor:~$ apt-cache policy firefox firefox: Installed: 24.0+build1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 Candidate: 24.0+build1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 Version table: *** 24.0+build1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 11.0+build1-0ubuntu4 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: lightdm 1.2.3-0ubuntu2.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-41.64~precise1-generic 3.5.7.21 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-41-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Sep 28 07:42:09 2013 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20120425) MarkForUpload: True ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: lightdm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: lightdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232354 Title: Crash when dragging bookmark in Firefox To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1232354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
The released 2.6.32-43-generic (with the corresponding compat-wireless package) has now been running for nearly 39 hours, so I'm going to go ahead and remove the -43 compat-wireless package and reboot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
The released 2.6.32-43-generic kernel crashed after about 5 hours uptime while the corresponding compat-wireless package was not also installed. So I think that this validates the hypothesis that the determining factor is the presence of the compat-wireless package (i.e. whether or not newer ath9k code is in use), as opposed to a potentially only partially installed kernel package (I made sure that there were no error messages when I last installed the -43 kernel package). If anyone's still interested in this issue I guess the next step would be to go back to the -42 kernel package without compat-wireless and so on, as far back as it takes to find the release in which the regression was introduced. But let me say that I've been running this box for some time and have always installed kernel upgrades when they became available (i.e. usually before the corresponding compat-wireless package became available), and I've not seen crashes like this before. Luis, since I seem to be the only person affected by this problem I would not object to closing this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
I have now purged all -43 and -44 kernels (i.e. the released -43 kernel and all test kernels v1 through v5), then reinstalled the released -43 kernel, and also pulled in the compat-wireless package for -43. After rebooting the machine has stayed up overnight. Luis and I both had a theory about the cause: - Luis found an installation issue in the apt logs which might have caused the initial installation of the -43 kernel to be bodged. I would however have expected that situation to have been corrected by my subsequent dpkg -i-ing of the test kernel packages. - I noticed that I am using certain modules from the compat-wireless package, and that a compat-wireless package corresponding with the -43 kernel package had not yet been available when I first upgraded to -43, nor while I was testing the v1 through v3 test kernels which were also based on the -43 ABI. I could try and remove the -43 compat-wireless package and test again; would you like me to do that? (Meanwhile I'll keep the current situation until the machine has been up for at least 48 hours in order to confirm stability). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
I can now explain one class of differences between the modules loaded under -42 versus -44. I am using the compat-wireless package, a version of which does not yet exist for the -44 kernel (or at least: I hadn't installed it). The two ath9k-related modules which are not being loaded under -44 but are being loaded under -42 come from the compat-wireless package. This still leaves me stumped as to why all of these filesystem-related modules are being loaded. They consume rather a lot of memory so I guess that (on this small embedded system) they might lead to certain kinds of memory running out. I would be grateful for any hints on finding out why these modules are being loaded. The only filesystem I'm using on this box is ext2 (on a CompactFlash card, if that makes any difference). Other than proc, sysfs, debugfs, securityfs, devtmpfs, devpts and tmpfs, that is. I guess the above story also holds true for the -43-based kernels you have asked me to test. I sincerely hope that this does not completely invalidate the tests I've been doing (and the kernel packages you've been building etc). Please advise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
I ran the lsmod commands just after a fresh reboot, so this doesn't seem to be it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
I guess I need to wait for a compat-wireless package to become available that corresponds with the -44 ABI. Although I can start by installing the -43 compat-wireless package and test that with the v1-v3 kernels you previously built for me (just to see whether the results are any different from the ones I reported earlier). I will make a start with that tonight. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
I'm really sorry, but this kernel (v5) is BAD. But I noticed that for some reason a different set of modules is being loaded. I have no idea why. I attach a file that shows the differences between the first column of lsmod's sorted output under each kernel (-42 and -44 v5). Why are a lot more (filesystem-related) modules being loaded? Furthermore, why are two ath9k-related modules not being loaded? Hmmm. ** Patch added: File created using diff -u https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+attachment/3367247/+files/lsmod.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
Assuming I've managed to install the correct package from -proposed: Linux skr03 2.6.32-44-generic #98-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 24 17:32:45 UTC 2012 i586 GNU/Linux the new kernel is BAD (it crashed after an hour and 10mins) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
By the way, I just noticed that I should have mentioned the presence in the box of a wireless adapter as well. Since the box is a broadband router it also acts as a wireless access point, using an ath9k card. No offload options (TSO, GSO) are active on this interface. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
I can confirm that the box is stable when running -42. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
v4 seems to behave similarly to v3: it also crashed after many hours, i.e. after a longer period than the released -43 package and the v1 and v2 packages did. But it still crashed. Once again I'm back on -42. I think I now need to stay on this package for a couple of days just to make sure that I'm not sending you on a wild goose chase (i.e. some coincidence perhaps due to flaky harware). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
v3 has stayed up overnight, which leads me to suspect that it is GOOD. I can't be categorical about this you understand: if it freezes it is certain to be bad, but if it doesn't it might merely not yet have crashed. So I'll leave it running and report back tomorrow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
Right. I'm glad I qualified my previous statement. It crashed after about 20 hours, which is much longer than than it took v1 and v2 to crash before. Could be coincidence, who knows. Going back to the -42.96 package now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
I am indeed not using ecryptfs. I am using GSO (generic segmentation offload) on one of the ethernet interfaces (the one that faces the LAN). Whereas the box has four ethernet interfaces I'm using only two. One faces the LAN (eth3), the other faces the VDSL modem (eth2), across which I set up a PPPoE link. GSO is in use on eth3 but not eth2. Please find the requested dmesg attached. ** Attachment added: dmesg output just after booting v4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+attachment/3332013/+files/skr03.dmesg.v4.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
The v2 kernel is also BAD -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
By the way: I may be able to test a few more kernels than one per day over the weekend. If this is a practical proposition, could you prepare three or four packages in one go? Please only do so if it's not too much trouble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] [NEW] After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
Public bug reported: I upgraded the kernel on this machine to linux-image-2.6.32-43-generic yesterday, and the machine has locked up solid three times since. This is a broadband router (Soekris net5501) without video or keyboard. I am monitoring the serial console and no messages are output when the crash occurs. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: linux-image-2.6.32-43-generic 2.6.32-43.97 Regression: Yes Reproducible: Yes ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-42.96-generic 2.6.32.59+drm33.24 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-42-generic i586 AlsaDevices: Error: command ['ls', '-l', '/dev/snd/'] failed with exit code 2: ls: cannot access /dev/snd/: No such file or directory AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Architecture: i386 ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Date: Wed Sep 19 12:53:20 2012 Lsusb: Bus 002 Device 002: ID 051d:0002 American Power Conversion Uninterruptible Power Supply Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub PciMultimedia: ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-42-generic root=UUID=198bbce8-57d4-4b24-8732-c6bd1f56dc81 ro console=ttyS0,9600n8 ipv6.disable=1 quiet splash ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SourcePackage: linux ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid needs-upstream-testing regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
I am the original bug reporter. I can confirm that reverting to the previous kernel package (linux- image-2.6.32-42-generic, version 2.6.32-42.96) returns the machine to stability. This is my broadband router, and my wife and I work from home a lot. I can test kernels for you, but only overnight because I need the box to be stable during the day. So a bisection run, even if you provide precompiled packages, is going to take several days to test (1 day per package). Happy to do so though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
Looking at the security notice that describes this kernel update I see that one of the changes is to do with TCP segmentation offload. Some additional information therefore. This machine has four Ethernet interfaces: root@skr03:~# lspci | grep Ethernet 00:06.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6105M [Rhine-III] (rev 96) 00:07.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6105M [Rhine-III] (rev 96) 00:08.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6105M [Rhine-III] (rev 96) 00:09.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6105M [Rhine-III] (rev 96) It uses the via-rhine driver: root@skr03:~# ethtool -i eth0 driver: via-rhine version: 1.4.3 firmware-version: bus-info: :00:06.0 TCP segmentation offload is not being used: root@skr03:~# (ethtool -k eth0 ; ethtool -k eth1 ; ethtool -k eth2 ; ethtool -k eth3) | grep tcp-segmentation-offload tcp-segmentation-offload: off tcp-segmentation-offload: off tcp-segmentation-offload: off tcp-segmentation-offload: off -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime
The v1 kernel you gave me to test is BAD -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1052861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 496681] Re: Rhythmbox does not save playlist on iPod
@cometdog: In the iPod's Sync menu, first disable syncing with all of your playlists. Sync. Then re-enable syncing with all of your playlists and sync again. That did it for me (Rhythmbox 2.96 on Ubuntu 12.04 and a 30GB 4th-gen iPod). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496681 Title: Rhythmbox does not save playlist on iPod To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/rhythmbox/+bug/496681/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1014985] [NEW] Banshee System.NullReferenceException while syncing
Public bug reported: Podcasts are not being synced to my ipod (30GB 4th gen). That is: Banshee's GUI says that it transfers the files across, but then they do not show up in the Podcasts menu, neither in Banshee nor on the device itself. Please refer to the debug output: this is the full output of banshee --debug; towards the end of the file there are lots of instances of the following: [18 Warn 08:37:28.597] Cannot save track to the Apple device - System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object (in `Banshee.Dap.AppleDevice') at Banshee.Dap.AppleDevice.AppleDeviceTrackInfo.CommitToIpod (GPod.ITDB database) [0x0] in filename unknown:0 at Banshee.Dap.AppleDevice.AppleDeviceSource.PerformSyncThreadCycle () [0x0] in filename unknown:0 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: banshee 2.4.0-2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic 3.2.18 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Jun 19 08:38:40 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20120425) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: banshee UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: banshee (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014985 Title: Banshee System.NullReferenceException while syncing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/1014985/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1014985] Re: Banshee System.NullReferenceException while syncing
** Attachment added: Full output of banshee --debug (start banshee, sync ipod, quit banshee) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014985/+attachment/3195636/+files/banshee.debug.out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014985 Title: Banshee System.NullReferenceException while syncing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/1014985/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989532] [NEW] Thunderbird does not connect to POP nor SMTP servers
Public bug reported: Thunderbird fails to connect to the POP and SMTP servers. These servers reside on the same subnet. There are no error messages to speak of; the connections just time out. This is not a firewall problem. I have verified that I can connect to the POP and SMTP servers using telnet. I did this from a terminal window on the same machine and as the same user as the one that cannot get Thunderbird to work, using commands like telnet popserver 110 and telnet smtpserver 25. Tracing with tcpdump confirms that no traffic is actually exchanged with the servers: there is no attempt at establishing a TCP connection. This is with Thunderbird freshly installed on Precise. It was not installed prior to the upgrade to Precise. There was no .thunderbird directory in my home directory. I was using Seamonkey before the upgrade and got Thunderbird to import everything from Seamonkey upon first use. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: thunderbird 11.0.1+build1-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic i686 AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24. ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5 Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: janc 2254 F pulseaudio BuildID: 20120411015315 CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'ICH6'/'Intel ICH6 with STAC9752,53 at irq 16' Mixer name : 'SigmaTel STAC9752,53' Components : 'AC97a:83847652' Controls : 30 Simple ctrls : 20 Channel: release CurrentDmesg: [ 50.162164] init: plymouth-stop pre-start process (1721) terminated with status 1 Date: Fri Apr 27 11:08:19 2012 ForcedLayersAccel: False IfupdownConfig: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/etc/network/interfaces' IncompatibleExtensions: EDS Contact Integration - ID=edsintegrat...@mozilla.com, Version=0.3.9, minVersion=7.0, maxVersion=11.0a1, Location=app-global, Type=extension, Active=Yes IpRoute: default via 192.168.1.5 dev eth0 proto static 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.6 metric 1 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.106 metric 2 IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Prefs: extensions.lastAppVersion - 11.0.1 network.cookie.prefsMigrated - true ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=11.0.1/20120411015315 RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory RunningIncompatibleAddons: True SourcePackage: thunderbird UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-27 (0 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 09/28/2005 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A09 dmi.board.name: 0UF414 dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 8 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA09:bd09/28/2005:svnDellInc.:pnInspiron6000:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0UF414:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr: dmi.product.name: Inspiron 6000 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. ftp_proxy: ftp://proxy.xperim.be:3128/ http_proxy: http://proxy.xperim.be:3128/ ** Affects: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise release-channel -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989532 Title: Thunderbird does not connect to POP nor SMTP servers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/989532/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989532] Re: Thunderbird does not connect to POP nor SMTP servers
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989532 Title: Thunderbird does not connect to POP nor SMTP servers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/989532/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 799144] [NEW] Manpage error: i8kmon's global configuration file is /etc/i8kmon.conf
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: i8kutils If i8kmon is started with --nouserconfig, then it reads its configuration from /etc/i8kmon.conf, rather than /etc/i8kmon as suggested by the manpage (last paragraph in section CONFIGURATION). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: i8kutils 1.33 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-28.50-generic 2.6.35.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Jun 18 15:23:08 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: i8kutils ** Affects: i8kutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799144 Title: Manpage error: i8kmon's global configuration file is /etc/i8kmon.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/i8kutils/+bug/799144/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 799144] Re: Manpage error: i8kmon's global configuration file is /etc/i8kmon.conf
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799144 Title: Manpage error: i8kmon's global configuration file is /etc/i8kmon.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/i8kutils/+bug/799144/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 614993] Re: 10.04 - 10.10 upgrade fails: pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks: xserver-xorg-video-v4l demoted to universe
I added also-affects update-manager because this problem has clearly not yet been fully resolved, despite the fix-released state on a number of affected packages. ** Also affects: update-manager Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614993 Title: 10.04 - 10.10 upgrade fails: pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks: xserver-xorg-video-v4l demoted to universe -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666468] Re: User interface language changed to French
Reproduced in Maverick Meerkat. Sorry, but it is not a reasonable request to a user to reproduce in an as-yet-unreleased distro. ** Changed in: xcfa (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666468 Title: User interface language changed to French -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 722146] [NEW] Upgrade fails while calculating changes
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager While trying to upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10, update-manager fails with the following error message: Could not determine the upgrade An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade. Please report this bug in the 'update-manager' package and try to include the following error message: 'E:Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages.' As far as I am aware there are no held packages. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: update-manager 1:0.134.11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-28.55-generic 2.6.32.27+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-28-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Feb 20 14:33:30 2011 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: update-manager ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722146 Title: Upgrade fails while calculating changes -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 722146] Re: Upgrade fails while calculating changes
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722146 Title: Upgrade fails while calculating changes -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 722146] Re: Upgrade fails while calculating changes
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 614993 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614993 Confirmed: this is indeed a duplicate of bug 614993. This did not jump out at me when I filed the bug though. Perhaps this is a problem worth fixing? ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 614993 10.04 - 10.10 upgrade fails: pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks: xserver-xorg-video-v4l demoted to universe * You can subscribe to bug 614993 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/614993/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722146 Title: Upgrade fails while calculating changes -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697770] [NEW] Typo on manpage; broken bug reporting link on manpage
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ureadahead Two problems on the manpage: (1) the word content in the second sentence explaining the --daemon option should read contend. So the sentence becomes This is ignored when reading on rotational hard drives, since it's important for performance reasons not to contend with other processes for I/O.. (2) the link in the BUGS section (https://launchpad.net/ureadahead/+bugs) yields ureadahead does not use Launchpad for bug tracking. . ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: ureadahead 0.100.0-4.1.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-27.49-generic 2.6.32.26+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-27-generic i686 Architecture: i386 CheckboxSubmission: 8875e8d46e5bb5b6b1753de9872e7eac CheckboxSystem: d00f84de8a555815fa1c4660280da308 Date: Wed Jan 5 18:38:10 2011 PackDump: Error: command ['ureadahead', '--dump'] failed with exit code 4: ureadahead:/var/lib/ureadahead/pack: Permission denied PackDumpLib.Init.Rw: Error: command ['ureadahead', '--dump'] failed with exit code 4: ureadahead:/var/lib/ureadahead/pack: Permission denied PackDumpMnt.Storage: Error: command ['ureadahead', '--dump'] failed with exit code 4: ureadahead:/var/lib/ureadahead/pack: Permission denied ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ureadahead ** Affects: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697770 Title: Typo on manpage; broken bug reporting link on manpage -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697770] Re: Typo on manpage; broken bug reporting link on manpage
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697770 Title: Typo on manpage; broken bug reporting link on manpage -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666468] [NEW] User interface language changed to French
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xcfa The user interface language has inexplicably and unexpectedly changed to French (from English). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: xcfa 3.7.3-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686 Architecture: i386 CheckboxSubmission: 8875e8d46e5bb5b6b1753de9872e7eac CheckboxSystem: d00f84de8a555815fa1c4660280da308 Date: Mon Oct 25 21:14:55 2010 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: xcfa ** Affects: xcfa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- User interface language changed to French https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666468] Re: User interface language changed to French
-- User interface language changed to French https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484698] Re: ntp package should not install a drift file
Carlos, Please can you return the status to Triaged? I'm unable to do so myself. Thanks, Jan C de-Avillez wrote: argh, wrong bug ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #514318 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514318 ** Also affects: ntp via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514318 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: ntp Importance: Unknown = Undecided ** Changed in: ntp Status: Unknown = New ** Changed in: ntp Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #514318 = None ** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #514318 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514318 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #514318 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514318 -- ntp package should not install a drift file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 484698] Re: ntp package should not install a drift file
Carlos, Please can you return the status to Triaged? I'm unable to do so myself. Thanks, Jan C de-Avillez wrote: argh, wrong bug ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #514318 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514318 ** Also affects: ntp via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514318 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: ntp Importance: Unknown = Undecided ** Changed in: ntp Status: Unknown = New ** Changed in: ntp Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #514318 = None ** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #514318 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514318 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #514318 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514318 -- ntp package should not install a drift file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454575] Re: [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 480144 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480144 Actually, the bug has been fixed when Ubuntu 9.10 adopted upstream stable kernel release 2.6.31.7 in the form of linux-image-2.6.31-17. See bug #480144 Ubuntu has since issued further kernel updates which also include the fix (we're now at -19). I assure you that this newer kernel does indeed fix the problem: I am running Karmic on a Soekris net4801 box that I previously could not install the 2.6.31 kernel on due to this boot-time crash. Please note that if you are installing 9.10 on such a box, rather than upgrading from a previous Ubuntu release, you will also need to use an ubuntu-installer package that includes the fixed kernel. So please use the ubuntu-installer files from http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/karmic- proposed/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/ -- [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 480144] Re: [Karmic] Update to 2.6.31.6 Stable Kernel
I successfully installed and booted this kernel on a machine having a National Semiconductor SC1200 PATA controller: 00:12.2 IDE interface: National Semiconductor Corporation SCx200, SC1100 IDE controller (rev 01) The previous 2.6.31 kernel would crash at boot. So I conclude that the issue pata_sc1200: Fix crash on boot has indeed been resolved in this kernel. -- [Karmic] Update to 2.6.31.6 Stable Kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 480144] Re: [Karmic] Update to 2.6.31.6 Stable Kernel
Martin, Martin Pitt wrote: Accepted linux into karmic-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed Sorry to bother you with this howto question. The particular issue I want to test is whether this kernel solves a boot-time crash in the pata_sc1200 module. It should; 2.6.31.6 contains a fix from Alan Cox for this. Since this is a boot-time crash, I have not been able to install Karmic on the machine in question (a Soekris net4801 - www.soekris.com). So it's currently running Intrepid. Can you help me install this Karmic kernel on the Intrepid system? It's OK if it trashes the system; this is a test machine anyway. Thanks a lot. Jan -- [Karmic] Update to 2.6.31.6 Stable Kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 480144] Re: [Karmic] Update to 2.6.31.6 Stable Kernel
Also fixes bug #454575 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/454575): [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot -- [Karmic] Update to 2.6.31.6 Stable Kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454575] Re: [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 480144 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480144 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 480144 [Karmic] Update to 2.6.31.6 Stable Kernel -- [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454575] Re: [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot
Fix released upstream in 2.6.31.6 -- [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484698] [NEW] ntp package should not install a drift file
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ntp The drift file (in Ubuntu its default location is /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift) contains ntpd's estimate of the system's drift relative to UTC, expressed in ppm. This file is generated by ntpd, and its purpose is to speed up convergence following restart. Ubuntu's ntp package installs a drift file containing 0.000, i.e. a zero drift. The effect is that when ntpd is first started following installation of the ntp package, it will assume that zero ppm is a good estimate of the drift of the system clock. This is not correct. If no reliable estimate of the drift is known (as is the case when ntp is first installed), the drift file should simply be absent, so that ntpd knows that characterisation of the system's drift has not yet happened. The current approach causes ntpd's startup behaviour to be significantly worse than it needs to be. Please therefore simply refrain from installing a drift file. If one already exists I recommend that the ntp installer should leave it alone, except perhaps for making sure that it has the correct permissions and ownership. ** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ntp package should not install a drift file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 484698] [NEW] ntp package should not install a drift file
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ntp The drift file (in Ubuntu its default location is /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift) contains ntpd's estimate of the system's drift relative to UTC, expressed in ppm. This file is generated by ntpd, and its purpose is to speed up convergence following restart. Ubuntu's ntp package installs a drift file containing 0.000, i.e. a zero drift. The effect is that when ntpd is first started following installation of the ntp package, it will assume that zero ppm is a good estimate of the drift of the system clock. This is not correct. If no reliable estimate of the drift is known (as is the case when ntp is first installed), the drift file should simply be absent, so that ntpd knows that characterisation of the system's drift has not yet happened. The current approach causes ntpd's startup behaviour to be significantly worse than it needs to be. Please therefore simply refrain from installing a drift file. If one already exists I recommend that the ntp installer should leave it alone, except perhaps for making sure that it has the correct permissions and ownership. ** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ntp package should not install a drift file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160002] Re: apparmor should have a 'usr' tunable
The recent change of description of this bug suggests a particular solution to the problem, which I think is incomplete. The problem occurs on my machine because, although /usr is located on the root filesystem, several of the directories under /usr are soft links to targets on a different filesystem. I need to do this because the root filesystem is a smallish flash disk that does not have enough space to hold some of the files that are needed only late in the boot process (such as X etc). I have fixed this by changing all of the apparmor configuration files that contain impacted paths to include the target path. Laborious, although such an update could probably be automated. Perhaps a dpkg-reconfigure hook could be added to enable the admin to update the apparmor config files when particular files or directories have been moved. -- apparmor should have a 'usr' tunable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160002 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454575] Re: [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot
In case the fix does not make it to you via -stable in time for the karmic release, here it is. Obtained from linux-next thusly: # git show 6d4f950e9ea15816c6a4f266ce6b9e438346771e fix-14227.patch ** Attachment added: fix-14227.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34357961/fix-14227.patch -- [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454575] Re: [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot
Not fixed in the Karmic Release Candidate -- [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454575] Re: [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot
Turns out the fix hadn't been submitted to stable. Jeff Garzik has now done so. -- [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454575] [NEW] [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.31-14-generic Kernel oops on boot into karmic generic kernel. Same thing happens on -386 kernel. Hardware: Soekris net4801. [4.668423] CR2: 73627653 [8.038252] ---[ end trace 0a414785c1792278 ]--- [8.093818] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! [8.164924] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Tainted: G D2.6.31-14-generic #48-Ubuntu [8.256738] Call Trace: [8.286233] [c056e41c] ? printk+0x18/0x1c [8.337633] [c056e360] panic+0x43/0xe7 [8.385882] [c0146b1f] find_new_reaper+0x7f/0x80 [8.444533] [c0147582] forget_original_parent+0x32/0x230 [8.511517] [c0147791] exit_notify+0x11/0x180 [8.567057] [c0147e6b] do_exit+0x18b/0x2e0 [8.619500] [c0144f8a] ? print_oops_end_marker+0x2a/0x30 [8.686482] [c0571730] oops_end+0x90/0xd0 [8.737856] [c0128ad4] no_context+0xb4/0xd0 [8.791326] [c0128b2d] __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x3d/0x1a0 [8.858305] [c03162c7] ? number+0x307/0x320 [8.911766] [c0317012] ? string+0x32/0xe0 [8.963126] [c0317c58] ? vsnprintf+0xc8/0x400 [9.018690] [c0128ca2] bad_area_nosemaphore+0x12/0x20 [9.082552] [c0572ea6] do_page_fault+0x2f6/0x380 [9.141213] [c0572bb0] ? do_page_fault+0x0/0x380 [9.199873] [c0570be3] error_code+0x73/0x80 [9.253334] [c048007b] ? binder_thread_write+0x78b/0xee0 [9.320323] [c03ce828] ? ata_finalize_port_ops+0x68/0xb0 [9.387297] [c03ce8d8] ata_host_start+0x68/0x1c0 [9.445958] [c0322025] ? pci_bus_write_config_byte+0x55/0x70 [9.517099] [c03dd4bb] ata_pci_sff_activate_host+0x2b/0x220 [9.587205] [c0488dfb] ? pcibios_set_master+0x9b/0xb0 [9.651069] [c03e0170] ? ata_sff_interrupt+0x0/0xd0 [9.712853] [c03ddb72] ata_pci_sff_init_one+0xe2/0x100 [9.59] [c023a3af] ? sysfs_addrm_start+0x3f/0xa0 [9.840582] [c03f7821] sc1200_init_one+0x21/0x30 [9.899252] [c032804e] local_pci_probe+0xe/0x10 [9.956857] [c0328dd0] pci_device_probe+0x60/0x80 [ 10.016569] [c03a2960] really_probe+0x50/0x140 [ 10.073202] [c05707da] ? _spin_lock_irqsave+0x2a/0x40 [ 10.137020] [c03a2a69] driver_probe_device+0x19/0x20 [ 10.199850] [c03a2ae9] __driver_attach+0x79/0x80 [ 10.258504] [c03a1fb8] bus_for_each_dev+0x48/0x70 [ 10.318208] [c03a2829] driver_attach+0x19/0x20 [ 10.374785] [c03a2a70] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x80 [ 10.434490] [c03a220f] bus_add_driver+0xbf/0x2a0 [ 10.493195] [c0328d10] ? pci_device_remove+0x0/0x40 [ 10.554925] [c03a2d75] driver_register+0x65/0x120 [ 10.614636] [c0239723] ? sysfs_add_file+0x13/0x20 [ 10.674329] [c03f7700] ? rz1000_init_one+0x0/0x80 [ 10.734028] [c0328ff0] __pci_register_driver+0x40/0xb0 [ 10.798916] [c07b8978] sc1200_init+0x14/0x16 [ 10.853419] [c010112c] do_one_initcall+0x2c/0x190 [ 10.913196] [c07b8964] ? sc1200_init+0x0/0x16 [ 10.968683] [c078e338] do_basic_setup+0x42/0x52 [ 11.026309] [c078e3bf] kernel_init+0x77/0xbe [ 11.080813] [c078e348] ? kernel_init+0x0/0xbe [ 11.136349] [c0104007] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 [ 11.377243] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 6304773819 ns) ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454575] Re: [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot
A patch has been posted on lkml: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=125484259025909w=2 -- [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454094] [NEW] Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager When trying to upgrade to karmic beta, the following is the last bit of output: --begin-- Restarting services possibly affected by the upgrade: gdm: reloading...done. dovecot: stopping...starting...done. cron: stopping...starting...done. atd: stopping...starting...done. Services restarted successfully. Processing triggers for libc-bin ... ldconfig deferred processing now taking place (Reading database ... 68105 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libpam-modules 1.0.1-9ubuntu1.1 (using .../libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process: Resource temporarily unavailable dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb Exception during pm.DoInstall(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Could not install the upgrades The upgrade is now aborted. Your system could be in an unusable state. A recovery will run now (dpkg --configure -a). Please report this bug against the 'update-manager' package and include the files in /var/log/dist-upgrade/ in the bug report. installArchives() failed --end-- ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Oct 17 18:42:35 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: update-manager (not installed) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-15.52-generic SourcePackage: update-manager Uname: Linux 2.6.28-15-generic i586 ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454094] Re: Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb
** Attachment added: /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33840413/apt.log -- Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454094] Re: Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb
** Attachment added: main.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33840433/main.log -- Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454094] Re: Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb
** Attachment added: xorg_fix_intrepid.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33840453/xorg_fix_intrepid.log -- Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119294] Re: OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock
@igorsh: is there a 64-bit CPU that supports Padlock? -- OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 119294] Re: OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock
@igorsh: is there a 64-bit CPU that supports Padlock? -- OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 395579] Re: sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid
Filed bug #399883 against intrepid-backports so that an explicit decision can be made on whether to backport this fix to intrepid. -- sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 395579] Re: sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid
I have now upgraded this system to jaunty from intrepid while running the hardy kernel. I confirm that the kernel included with intrepid (Linux soekris 2.6.28-13-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 30 19:49:51 UTC 2009 i586) works with the sc1200 disk controller. So: fixed in jaunty. Question mark remains as to the upgrade process from hardy to jaunty; I suggest something be added to the intrepid release notes at http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/810 -- sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 395579] Re: sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid
I won't have time to test this for a few days, but my concerns are as follows: - intrepid (8.10) is currently a necessary step on the upgrade path from 8.04 LTS to 9.04 LTS; - 8.10 does not boot on a system that depends on an sc1200 disk controller; - the work-around is to boot the 8.04 LTS kernel, but I don't know (and won't have time for several days) to test whether a distribution upgrade works while running a kernel version that does not match the distribution being upgraded. So as it stands, I submit that this is still a problem that needs to be resolved in 8.10, even if 9.04 LTS supports the sc1200 controller. -- sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 395579] Re: sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid
Feel free to change back to incomplete if you disagree that the issue needs to be resolved in 8.10 only on the strength of the facts presented thus far ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355619] Re: Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing
Files attached as requested. First: apt.log ** Attachment added: /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28738902/apt.log -- Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355619] Re: Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing
apt-term.log ** Attachment added: /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-term.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28738937/apt-term.log -- Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355619] Re: Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing
main.log ** Attachment added: /var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28738949/main.log -- Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355619] Re: Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing
xorg_fix_intrepid.log ** Attachment added: /var/log/dist-upgrade/xorg_fix_intrepid.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28738958/xorg_fix_intrepid.log ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355619] Re: Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing
I apologise, the attachments I just added are related to another bug of mine, not to this-one. Please discard these attachments. I no longer have the requested information, because since upgrading this machine to hardy I have further upgraded it to januty. ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 395579] [NEW] sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid
Public bug reported: My Soekris net4801 won't boot after the upgrade from hardy to interpid: it can't find the root partition. I think that this is the case because neither version of the disk controller module (drivers/pci/sc1200, drivers/ata/pata_sc1200) is supported in the generic config. I can boot using the kernel that's left from hardy (Linux soekris 2.6.24-24-generic #1 SMP Tue Jun 30 20:28:53 UTC 2009 i586 GNU/Linux), but get dumped to (initramfs) when the intrepid kernel times out waiting for the root filesystem. ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - sc1200 ide controller not supported in jaunty + sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid -- sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382060] [NEW] system-health error message: Specified sensor(s) not found!
Public bug reported: The report produced by /etc/cron.daily/system-health contains the error message Specified sensor(s) not found! on my system, instead of the sensors report. This is the case because /usr/bin/system-health invokes /usr/bin/sensors with parameter lm79-isa-*. This parameter is hard-coded in the script. Removing this parameter by emptying the $sensorChips variable declaration solves the problem for me. This is on a system recently upgraded to hardy from gutsy. # apt-cache policy debian-helper-scripts debian-helper-scripts: Installed: 0.10ubuntu3 Candidate: 0.10ubuntu3 # lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.04.2 Release:8.04 ** Affects: debian-helper-scripts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- system-health error message: Specified sensor(s) not found! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 343204] Re: Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660
Here's my feeble attempt at diagnosing this: mythbuntu-control-centre_0.10-0ubuntu1_all.deb is not the smoking gun, but it does contain the following in data/usr/share/pycentral/mythbuntu-control-centre/site-packages/MythbuntuControlCentre/changer.py: def write_mysql_txt(self,user,password,database,server): Writes out a mysql.txt in /etc/mythtv if os.path.exists(/etc/mythtv/mysql.txt): print Moving /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt to /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt.mythbuntu-old shutil.move(/etc/mythtv/mysql.txt, /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt.mythbuntu-old) out_f = open(/etc/mythtv/mysql.txt, w) out_f.write(DBHostName= + server + \n) out_f.write(DBUserName= + user + \n) out_f.write(DBName= + database + \n) out_f.write(DBPassword= + password + \n) out_f.close() This snippet does not appear to set the mode of the file at all, so that it inherits the permissions from /etc/mythtv (which on my system is owner by root). I think that this does need to be fixed. mythtv-common_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_all.deb control/postinst contains the following: NEW=$(mktemp -t mysql.txt-XX) if [ -s /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt ]; then INPUT=/etc/mythtv/mysql.txt chown --reference=$INPUT $NEW chmod --reference=$INPUT $NEW else INPUT=/usr/share/mythtv/mysql.txt.dist chown mythtv:mythtv $NEW chmod 660 $NEW fi ($NEW later gets mv-ed into place). This seems correct: it either inherits the ownership and mode of the file if it already exists, or else it gets set to mythtv:mythtv and 660. That's all I've been able to come up with. This was done by searching for mysql.txt within the files contained in the deb archives (ar -x, followed by tar zxvf of both data and control files, followed by fgrep -r). If you have other suggestions for diagnosing this I'd be delighted. Thanks -- Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 343204] Re: Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660
Here is the full list of deb files I searched through, just in case you can point me to files I should also have inspected: libmyth-0.20_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_i386.deb libmyth-dev_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_i386.deb mytharchive_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_i386.deb mytharchive-data_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_all.deb mythbrowser_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_i386.deb mythbuntu-artwork-usplash_0.6-0ubuntu1_i386.deb mythbuntu-control-centre_0.10-0ubuntu1_all.deb mythbuntu-default-settings_0.63-0ubuntu1_all.deb mythbuntu-desktop_0.8_i386.deb mythbuntu-gdm-theme_0.2-0ubuntu1_all.deb mythbuntu-lirc-generator_0.16-0ubuntu1_all.deb mythcontrols_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_i386.deb mythdvd_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_i386.deb mythgallery_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_i386.deb mythmusic_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_i386.deb mythnews_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_i386.deb mythplugins_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_all.deb mythstream_0.17.2-0ubuntu1_i386.deb mythtv_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_all.deb mythtv-backend_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_i386.deb mythtv-common_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_all.deb mythtv-database_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_all.deb mythtv-doc_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_all.deb mythtv-frontend_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_i386.deb mythtv-themes_0.20-0.1ubuntu1_all.deb mythtv-transcode-utils_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_i386.deb mythtvfs_0.5.0-1_i386.deb mythvideo_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_i386.deb mythweather_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_i386.deb mythweb_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_all.deb ubuntu-mythtv-frontend_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_all.deb -- Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 343204] Re: Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660
I'm afraid I'm not able to actually fix this ** Changed in: mythtv (Ubuntu) Assignee: JanCeuleers (jan-ceuleers) = Mario Limonciello (superm1) -- Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 343204] [NEW] Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660
Mario, I will attempt to identify the cause of the mode squashing of this file. It will be a fez days before I have a chance to look at this though. Thanks, Jan -- Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 343204] [NEW] Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660
Public bug reported: My frontend machine runs mythfrontend as user frontend, not as user mythtv. I believe that this is a supported configuration. User frontend is a member of group mythtv. This is however not enough for user frontend to be able to read /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt, since it has mode 600. I think that this file should have mode 660 so that members of group mythtv are able to access it. Something (I don't know what) periodically resets the mode of this file to 600, causing my frontend no longer to be able to access the database. Details: r...@fe2:~# lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 7.10 Release:7.10 r...@fe2:~# apt-cache policy mythtv mythtv: Installed: (none) Candidate: 0.21.0-0ubuntu2~gutsy1 Version table: 0.21.0-0ubuntu2~gutsy1 0 500 http://be.archive.ubuntu.com gutsy-backports/multiverse Packages 0.20.2-0ubuntu10.1 0 500 http://be.archive.ubuntu.com gutsy-updates/multiverse Packages 0.20.2-0ubuntu10 0 500 http://be.archive.ubuntu.com gutsy/multiverse Packages ** Affects: mythtv (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 343204] Re: Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660
Mario, Thanks for your comment. Unfortunately, trying 9.04 is not an option for me right now; this is a production system which has many version dependencies outside of mythtv. If you believe that this problem has been solved in recent versions of mythtv (or mythbuntu) then I'm happy. Meanwhile I can just chmod the file from /etc/rc.local as a work-around. Up to you what to do about this ticket; I'm not opposed to it being closed. Cheers, Jan -- Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252365] Re: mdadm does not add spares to arrays on boot
I have been advised on the linux-raid mailing list [1] that this problem is more likely to be caused by mkinitrd than by mdadm, and that I should therefore file a bug against initramfs-tools. [1]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-raidm=123421650832520w=2 ** Also affects: initramfs-tools Importance: Undecided Status: New -- mdadm does not add spares to arrays on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252365 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252365] Re: mdadm does not add spares to arrays on boot
I'm sorry for having let this bug linger for such a long time. I think I have now found the proper solution to this problem. Restating the problem: I have six disks, four of which are served by a sata-sil24 controller, the other two being served by a sata-via controller. The active partitions of my raid5 set live on the first four disks, the spare partitions live on one of the other two disks (the other being used for backup). With the above setup, the active members of the raid set would come up fine upon boot, but the spares would not be added automatically, so that I had to add them from /etc/rc.local On my system, this problem has been solved by including both sata modules in the initrd image. That is: I added sata-via and sata-sil24 to /etc/initramfs-tools/modules , rebuilt the initrd images using update- initramfs -u -k all, and everything is now activated automatically on boot. Bjorn Ruud: can you let us know whether your spare disk is also served by a controller that requires a different module from the one serving your active disks? If so, would you give the above a go and report back? -- mdadm does not add spares to arrays on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252365 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
