from:"Lindsay"

Can you tell us what mail server you're connecting to?

By the way this is ticketed upstream here:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/6316

** Changed in: geary
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Changed in: geary (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169280

Title:
  Geary crashes after ~1mn activity

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/geary/+bug/1169280/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1169280] Re: Geary crashes after ~1mn activity

Interesting, I don't think we've ever seen this with gmail before!  I'm
not the IMAP expert here, so it's hard for me to say why your sent mail
would be triggering this reliably.

If you remove all other accounts from Geary, I assume it still happens?
Could you please remove the other accounts, then run geary with --log-
network as well, and capture its log output:

geary --debug --log-network  geary.log

And attach that log to this (or the redmine) ticket, or if you're
concerned about private information in it (it does list your account
email address and folder names, for example), send it to ge...@yorba.org
for us to examine?  A full network trace might help us figure out what's
going on.

 I could not for the life of me understand how to register to
submit/comment.

No worries, we try to keep up with launchpad bugs too.  For the record,
there's a tiny register link the very top right hand corner of redmine
that takes you to: http://redmine.yorba.org/account/register.

Anyway, thanks for your help!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169280

Title:
  Geary crashes after ~1mn activity

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/geary/+bug/1169280/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1169280] Re: Geary crashes after ~1mn activity

 I'll pursue here as the discussion has already started here

That's no problem.  I'll attach your log to our redmine ticket as well,
just so when we start looking into this, we have fewer clicks to get
everything we need.  :)

It makes sense that it's only the one account with the issue.  UID
validity is something specific to an account (even a specific folder in
an account, I believe), but I was just confirming 100% and simplifying
the repro case.

I think your log is all the debugging help we need for now.  I
appreciate your offer to let us access your account -- we may take you
up on that in the future if we run into issues debugging from the log.
We'll let you know if it comes to that.

We're glad you're enjoying Geary!  Thanks for all your help with this
issue.

** Changed in: geary
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

** Changed in: geary (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169280

Title:
  Geary crashes after ~1mn activity

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/geary/+bug/1169280/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1169280] Re: Geary crashes after ~1mn activity

I think I see the problem: you have one IMAP folder named [GMail] and
one named [Gmail] (note the different case on the M).  Not sure how that
would happen.  In my gmail account, [Gmail] with lower m is the name for
that folder.  I'm also not sure how you'd rectify the situation without
risking deleting your real sent mail folder.

Do these two folders show up separately in gmail's web interface, or are
there any duplicately named labels or anything weird like that?

So, I think the bug you're actually running into is that Geary is
treating these two folders as the same, when it shouldn't be.  I've
ticketed that in http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/6821.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169280

Title:
  Geary crashes after ~1mn activity

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/geary/+bug/1169280/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1162388] Re: geary crashed with SIGSEGV in handler_unref_R()

We've just released Geary 0.3.1 which fixes a couple of crashers that
look similar to this one.  Any chance you could upgrade and see if the
problem persists?

** Changed in: geary (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162388

Title:
  geary crashed with SIGSEGV in handler_unref_R()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geary/+bug/1162388/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1161802] Re: geary crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()

This looks like a bug we know about, ticketed at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/6682.  What IMAP server are you
connecting to?

** Changed in: geary (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1161802

Title:
  geary crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geary/+bug/1161802/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1161417] Re: geary crashed with SIGSEGV in geary_imap_fetch_results_get_body_data()

We've got some server compatibility issues right now, unfortunately (see
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/6646).  What IMAP servers were you
connecting to, and does it happen every time?

** Changed in: geary (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1161417

Title:
  geary crashed with SIGSEGV in geary_imap_fetch_results_get_body_data()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geary/+bug/1161417/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1161417] Re: geary crashed with SIGSEGV in geary_imap_fetch_results_get_body_data()

Without any more testing, I have to assume this bug is the same one
ticketed in http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/6646.  We're going to be
tackling this server support issue soon.

** Changed in: geary (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1161417

Title:
  geary crashed with SIGSEGV in geary_imap_fetch_results_get_body_data()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geary/+bug/1161417/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1077105] Re: amrecover - can't talk to tape server: service amidxtaped:

2013-03-17 Thread Lindsay

Yes, this fix is essentially the the same as the one posted on
old.nabble.com.  According to this bug, the problem is due to newer
versions of perl enforcing stricter syntax conformity which exposes the
program sloppiness to which the programmer is probably referring.

Thanks for posting the workaround, which will help until this is fixed
in an officially distributed release of amanda, either by Ubuntu, or
upstream, and the fix is backported to 12.04 LTS - which it should be.
System administrators obviously shouldn't have to patch up a poorly
written perl script in order to have a fully functional amanda for a
task as critical as backup/restore, much less go out and research the
bug when an amanda restore fails and they need to get lost data back
online in a hurry.  The boss will NOT be happy!

I fixed this bug because I could.  I grok perl well enough that I could,
once I found the solution.  Not every system administrator is as
fortunate, nor should he or she need to be :)

One way or another, Canonical/Ubuntu needs to get this fix into a Stable
Release Upgrade process for 12.04 LTS.  Rocket science this ain't.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077105

Title:
  amrecover - can't talk to tape server: service amidxtaped:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amanda/+bug/1077105/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1077105] Re: amrecover - can't talk to tape server: service amidxtaped:

2013-03-09 Thread Lindsay

This is a perl issue, and a fix has been available since June of 2011.
See http://old.nabble.com/amrecover---can%27t-talk-to-tape-server%3A-
service-amidxtaped%3A-td31861008.html where patches for this problem are
posted. This problem is related to Bug #1056641 which deals with the
perl issue, but doesn't provide a fix.

I'm running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS on two different servers and have applied
the patches from the above URL and can attest to the fact that they do
indeed fix the problem. I'm attaching the relevant patches since I
haven't seen them posted on Ubuntu Launchpad in relation to this
problem. Since these were drawn from a copy and paste from the Nabble
website, you'll have to dissect this diff and apply each patch with -l.

I'm running an LTS version of Ubuntu with the understanding that
problems of this sort will be addressed as fixes become available for
the next 4+ years. Since backup and restore are mission critical
administrative tasks for servers used in business environments, I would
hope that this matter would be given some priority attention. My guess
is that this may not have been a problem in the original release of
12.04 and that an upgrade to perl during the past year may have caused
this bug to surface. The problem is especially nasty since there's no
problem making backups with amanda as it's distributed, but it fails
when the backups are needed in a hurry to restore lost data.

** Patch added: Patches for several perl modules in amanda

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amanda/+bug/1077105/+attachment/3565183/+files/amanda_perl_patch.diff

--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077105

Title:
amrecover - can't talk to tape server: service amidxtaped:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amanda/+bug/1077105/+subscriptions

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1074574] Re: known issue: amrecover - can't talk to tape server: service amidxtaped:

2013-03-09 Thread Lindsay

The fix for this bug should be bacported ASAP to precise (12.04 LTS)
since it renders amanda useless as a functional backup package.  The bug
only shows up when amanda is needed most - when data has been lost and
needs to be restored from backups, which is unacceptable for a LTS
release used in production and enterprise environments.  The SRU
Procedure referred to by logan is very obscure and the page he links to
is long on what and when, and short on exactly how to get this process
going.  Perhaps one of the Ubuntu team would be kind enough to undertake
to escalate Bug #1077105 (which provides a fix) accordingly and put the
fix into consideration for backporting to the LTS version.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074574

Title:
  known issue: amrecover - can't talk to tape server: service
  amidxtaped:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amanda/+bug/1074574/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1077105] Re: amrecover - can't talk to tape server: service amidxtaped:

2013-03-09 Thread Lindsay

My understanding is that this bug has already been squashed in Raring
Ringtail (see bug #1074574), so it's a known issue with a known fix
going forward.  My concern is that it hasn't been backported to Precise
Pangolian (12.04 LTS).  LTS versions of Ubuntu are the ones used in
production environments, on mission-critical servers, where the
maintenance of a rock solid backup and restore system is a basic system
administration duty.  The procedure for getting a bug on a released
version of Ubuntu onto the SRU track is not well documented online
(which is probably a bug in itself) and I ended up emailing one of the
SRU team administrators about it in the hope of moving it in that
direction.

I've already fixed this bug on my servers, so the patch is as much as
anything for the convenience of others who may be having the same
problem in Precise.  My concern is that someone installing the lastest
LTS version of Ubuntu Server shouldn't have to deal with a disabling bug
in a major backup and restore suite for which a fix was available a year
and a half ago and which is already fixed in the latest non-LTS
releases.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077105

Title:
  amrecover - can't talk to tape server: service amidxtaped:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amanda/+bug/1077105/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 836849] Re: Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager, even when only using 'interfaces' and not 'bind interfaces only'

2013-01-28 Thread camden lindsay

Thank you, Clint.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849

Title:
  Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager, even when only
  using 'interfaces' and not 'bind interfaces only'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 836849] Re: Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager, even when only using 'interfaces' and not 'bind interfaces only'

2013-01-28 Thread camden lindsay

Thank you, Clint.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849

Title:
  Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager, even when only
  using 'interfaces' and not 'bind interfaces only'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 935778] Re: Various Toshiba laptops - brightness controls work on first boot, but do nothing after suspend/resume to RAM.

2012-11-16 Thread camden lindsay

Comment/link in #57 worked for me on my Portege r705-P25

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/935778

Title:
  Various Toshiba laptops - brightness controls work on first boot, but
  do nothing after suspend/resume to RAM.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/935778/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 996906] Re: periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

2012-11-15 Thread Charles Lindsay

And I'll reiterate that when I simply uninstall pulse, but use the same
hardware with alsa, the audio doesn't skip.  I don't think it's accurate
to say it's purely the hda driver.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996906

Title:
  periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/996906/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1054557] Re: Chromium 20.0.1132.47 and 21.0.1180.89 keep crashing silently

2012-10-18 Thread Mike Lindsay

Chrome been working fine for a few months now.  I come in this morning,
my computer is shut off, implying a power event.  I turn it back on,
everything seems to come up normally.  I get to chrome start surfing my
morning rituals, and chrome just goes away.  This is on ubuntu 12.04 x64
running chrome Version 22.0.1229.94.  I played around with it a bit, and
it did it aboue 3 times in the course of 5 minutes.  It seemed to happen
anytime I clicked a link.  I haven't noticed if it was related to tab
behavior or not as previous posters have said.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054557

Title:
  Chromium 20.0.1132.47 and 21.0.1180.89 keep crashing silently

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1054557/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 996906] Re: periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

2012-10-16 Thread Charles Lindsay

Like I said above, mine now skips much less frequently than every 10
minutes, so I'm skeptical about tweaking any pulse configs at this
point.  And since all I did to have it skip less frequently was re-
install pulseaudio and update to all the latest precise packages, it
seems like the issue is somewhere in the interaction between pulse and
the kernel or hardware or the system in general.

If there's a way I can test using the wakeup_rt tracer I'm happy to do
so.  Is there any documentation I can read about doing so?  A quick
google search turned up nothing I could decipher.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996906

Title:
  periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/996906/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 996906] Re: periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

2012-10-16 Thread Charles Lindsay

Results: using options snd-hda-intel position_fix=1 in /etc/modprobe.d
/alsa-base.conf didn't make the problem go away.  Using position_fix=2
made the problem actively worse: the audio literally didn't do anything
but skip.  Using load-module module-udev-detect tsched=0 in
/etc/pulse/default.pa made flash videos unplayable (not just the audio,
but the video would stutter as well).  In short, none of those fixes
solved my problem.

Any other ideas?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996906

Title:
  periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/996906/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 996906] Re: periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

2012-10-15 Thread Charles Lindsay

I've been trying to reproduce this issue for the last couple weeks, and
I'm somewhat happy to say it happens much, much less frequently now.
Unfortunately, it still happens.  It's now on the order of once every
few hours on average instead of once every few minutes, but much less
regularly -- only one afternoon has it happened more than once as I've
been listening to music, and that afternoon it happened 3 or 4 times.
I'm on pulseaudio 1:1.1-0ubuntu15.1 and kernel 3.2.0-32-generic now.

Anyway, that's made it much harder to test any fixes.  Now that I've got
a bit better idea of how it behaves lately, I'll turn off timer
scheduling and report back after some time.  I'm assuming the
position_fix hack won't do anything, since my audio is 100% fine under
alsa.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996906

Title:
  periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/996906/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 996906] Re: periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

2012-10-15 Thread Charles Lindsay

Ah, ok.  That means I've got even more testing to do.  Thanks for your
help; I'll report back with my results.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996906

Title:
  periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/996906/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1050138] Re: Trying to connect to server with SSH

2012-09-13 Thread Lindsay Feuling

Okay, um, I guess this is NOT a bug, but rather an oversight on my part with 
configuration. 
It appears that I needed to install the additional package, gvfs-backends, to 
make things work. 

Thank you for everything!
-L Feuling

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050138

Title:
  Trying to connect to server with SSH

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1050138/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1050138] [NEW] Trying to connect to server with SSH

2012-09-12 Thread Lindsay Feuling

Public bug reported:

System info:
Description:Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
Release:12.04

From the Ubuntu File menu, I choose Connect to Server

I fill out the proper server address, and choose the type as SSH from the 
selection list. 
I fill out my folder name properly as well as the user name and password. 

Then when I try to connect, I get the error message:

Failed to execute child process /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-sftp (no such
file or directory)

Big bummer, because it worked in 11.10 before, but since I recently
updated to 12.04, it does NOT!

I also noticed, that in the folder /usr/lib/gvfs that there is no
gvfsd-sftp, nor even gvfsd-ftp.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: gvfs 1.12.1-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic-pae 3.2.24
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx wl
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu13
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Sep 12 20:04:05 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111012)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SourcePackage: gvfs
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-09-03 (9 days ago)

** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050138

Title:
  Trying to connect to server with SSH

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1050138/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1050138] Re: Trying to connect to server with SSH

2012-09-12 Thread Lindsay Feuling

** Attachment added: Attached is a screen shot of the window showing the error
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050138/+attachment/3311345/+files/Screenshot%20from%202012-09-12%2020%3A11%3A42.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050138

Title:
  Trying to connect to server with SSH

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1050138/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1024833] [NEW] [exec] error, rc=134, output=## A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:##

2012-07-14 Thread Lindsay Druett

Public bug reported:

root@hazar-enan:/var/log/unifi# cat /usr/lib/unifi/hs_err_pid1330.log
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
#  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0xb6dbed6d, pid=1330, tid=3010128704
#
# JRE version: 6.0_24-b24
# Java VM: OpenJDK Client VM (20.0-b12 mixed mode, sharing linux-x86 )
# Derivative: IcedTea6 1.11.3
# Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, package 6b24-1.11.3-1ubuntu0.12.04.1
# Problematic frame:
# V  [libjvm.so+0x18bd6d]  
DictionaryEntry::contains_protection_domain(oopDesc*) const+0xd
#
# If you would like to submit a bug report, please include
# instructions how to reproduce the bug and visit:
#   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/
#

---  T H R E A D  ---

Current thread (0xb3bed800):  JavaThread db-server daemon
[_thread_in_vm, id=1397, stack(0xb365e000,0xb36af000)]

siginfo:si_signo=SIGSEGV: si_errno=0, si_code=1 (SEGV_MAPERR),
si_addr=0x0008

Registers:
EAX=0x, EBX=0xb715cff4, ECX=0x640101e8, EDX=0x01b91a01
ESP=0xb36ad834, EBP=0x, ESI=0x640101e8, EDI=0x
EIP=0xb6dbed6d, EFLAGS=0x0282, CR2=0x0008

Top of Stack: (sp=0xb36ad834)
0xb36ad834:   b6902830 b3bedff4 b6f15949 b715cff4
0xb36ad844:   b6902830 b3bedfb8 b3bedfb0 b6dbfea4
0xb36ad854:    640101e8 01b91a57 b3bedfb0
0xb36ad864:   b3bedfbc   b715cff4
0xb36ad874:   b3bedfbc b715cff4 b3bedfbc b6fb647c
0xb36ad884:   b6915090 010d 01b91a57 b3bedfb0
0xb36ad894:   b3bedfbc b3bedfb8 b3bed800 b3bed800
0xb36ad8a4:   b3bedb90 b3bedf7c b6916078 b6902830

Instructions: (pc=0xb6dbed6d)
0xb6dbed4d:   c4 10 5b 5e 5f c3 90 8d b6 00 00 00 00 8d bf 00
0xb6dbed5d:   00 00 00 57 56 83 ec 14 8b 7c 24 20 8b 74 24 24
0xb6dbed6d:   8b 47 08 8d 50 08 8b 40 08 89 14 24 ff 50 34 b1
0xb6dbed7d:   01 39 f0 74 23 8b 57 0c 31 c9 85 d2 74 1a b1 01

Register to memory mapping:

EAX=0x is an unknown value
EBX=0xb715cff4: offset 0x529ff4 in 
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-i386/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so at 0xb6c33000
ECX=0x640101e8 is an oop
java.security.ProtectionDomain
 - klass: 'java/security/ProtectionDomain'
EDX=0x01b91a01 is an unknown value
ESP=0xb36ad834 is pointing into the stack for thread: 0xb3bed800
EBP=0x is an unknown value
ESI=0x640101e8 is an oop
java.security.ProtectionDomain
 - klass: 'java/security/ProtectionDomain'
EDI=0x is an unknown value


Stack: [0xb365e000,0xb36af000],  sp=0xb36ad834,  free space=318k
Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
V  [libjvm.so+0x18bd6d]  DictionaryEntry::contains_protection_domain(oopDesc*) 
const+0xd

[error occurred during error reporting (printing native stack), id 0xb]

Java frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code)
j  
com.ubnt.ace.ooOO.o0(Ljava/lang/String;[Ljava/lang/String;)Lcom/ubnt/ace/ooOO$o;+74
j  com.ubnt.ace.ooOO.new(Ljava/lang/String;[Ljava/lang/String;)V+2
j  com.ubnt.service.system.DbService.run()V+481
j  java.lang.Thread.run()V+11
v  ~StubRoutines::call_stub

---  P R O C E S S  ---

Java Threads: ( = current thread )
  0xb3711400 JavaThread process reaper daemon [_thread_in_native, id=1398, 
stack(0xb360d000,0xb365e000)]
=0xb3bed800 JavaThread db-server daemon [_thread_in_vm, id=1397, 
stack(0xb365e000,0xb36af000)]
  0xb41d3400 JavaThread db-timer daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1396, 
stack(0xb36af000,0xb370)]
  0xb3bcc800 JavaThread discover daemon [_thread_in_native, id=1395, 
stack(0xb3848000,0xb3899000)]
  0xb69fc800 JavaThread unifi daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1380, 
stack(0xb3c98000,0xb3ce9000)]
  0xb69fec00 JavaThread system-timer daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1379, 
stack(0xb3e0a000,0xb3e5b000)]
  0xb693bc00 JavaThread Low Memory Detector daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1340, 
stack(0xb3fdd000,0xb402e000)]
  0xb6939c00 JavaThread C1 CompilerThread0 daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1339, 
stack(0xb402e000,0xb40af000)]
  0xb6938400 JavaThread Signal Dispatcher daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1338, 
stack(0xb40af000,0xb410)]
  0xb6934800 JavaThread Finalizer daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1335, 
stack(0xb420b000,0xb425c000)]
  0xb6933000 JavaThread Reference Handler daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1334, 
stack(0xb425c000,0xb42ad000)]
  0xb6905400 JavaThread launcher [_thread_blocked, id=1332, 
stack(0xb6ab3000,0xb6b04000)]

Other Threads:
  0xb6931400 VMThread [stack: 0xb42ad000,0xb432e000] [id=1333]
  0xb693e400 WatcherThread [stack: 0xb3f5c000,0xb3fdd000] [id=1341]

VM state:not at safepoint (normal execution)

VM Mutex/Monitor currently owned by a thread:  ([mutex/lock_event])
[0xb6902830] SystemDictionary_lock - owner thread: 0xb3bed800

Heap
 def new generation   total 2368K, used 722K [0x4ea6, 0x4ecf, 
0x63fb)
  eden space 2112K,  22% used [0x4ea6, 0x4ead4b00, 0x4ec7)
  from space 256K, 100% used [0x4ecb, 0x4ecf, 0x4ecf)
  to   space 256K,   0% used [0x4ec7, 0x4ec7, 0x4ecb)
 tenured generation   total 5312K, used 4808K

[Bug 1024833] Re: [exec] error, rc=134, output=## A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:##

2012-07-14 Thread Lindsay Druett

Upgrading unifi to unifi-beta did the following upgrades...

 * default-jre-headless
 *  unifi-beta

Still the same outcome...

root@hazar-enan:/var/log/unifi# cat /usr/lib/unifi/hs_err_pid1624.log
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
#  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0xb6ebdf77, pid=1624, tid=3015215936
#
# JRE version: 6.0_24-b24
# Java VM: OpenJDK Client VM (20.0-b12 mixed mode, sharing linux-x86 )
# Derivative: IcedTea6 1.11.3
# Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, package 6b24-1.11.3-1ubuntu0.12.04.1
# Problematic frame:
# V  [libjvm.so+0x2f6f77]  ObjectMonitor::exit(Thread*)+0x17
#
# If you would like to submit a bug report, please include
# instructions how to reproduce the bug and visit:
#   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/
#

---  T H R E A D  ---

Current thread (0xb3a12800):  JavaThread unifi daemon
[_thread_in_Java, id=1638, stack(0xb3b38000,0xb3b89000)]

siginfo:si_signo=SIGSEGV: si_errno=0, si_code=1 (SEGV_MAPERR),
si_addr=0x0011

Registers:
EAX=0x0001, EBX=0xb70f0ff4, ECX=0x64005e90, EDX=0xb3b8563c
ESP=0xb3b85420, EBP=0xb3a12800, ESI=0x0001, EDI=0xb3b8563c
EIP=0xb6ebdf77, EFLAGS=0x0292, CR2=0x0011

Top of Stack: (sp=0xb3b85420)
0xb3b85420:   b70f0f00 b3b854a4 b491e99a b491e908
0xb3b85430:    b3b855c8 b3b854a4 b3b855d0
0xb3b85440:   b497f71f b497f448  b70f0ff4
0xb3b85450:   0003 b3b8563c b3a12800 b6f462e3
0xb3b85460:   0001 b3a12800 b3a12800 4ea8cc18
0xb3b85470:   b6cbb118 b497f71f b3b85490 b70f0ff4
0xb3b85480:   b3b854cc b3b8563c b3b85608 b6f4639c
0xb3b85490:   64005e90 b3b8563c b3a12800 b3b8548d 

Instructions: (pc=0xb6ebdf77)
0xb6ebdf57:   04 00 83 c4 18 5b c3 66 90 55 57 56 53 83 ec 2c
0xb6ebdf67:   e8 00 00 00 00 5b 81 c3 88 30 23 00 8b 74 24 40
0xb6ebdf77:   8b 46 10 39 44 24 44 74 2c 8b 4c 24 44 8b 56 10
0xb6ebdf87:   8b 01 89 54 24 04 89 0c 24 ff 50 40 84 c0 74 67 

Register to memory mapping:

EAX=0x0001 is an unknown value
EBX=0xb70f0ff4: offset 0x529ff4 in 
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-i386/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so at 0xb6bc7000
ECX=0x64005e90 is an oop
sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader 
 - klass: 'sun/misc/Launcher$AppClassLoader'
EDX=0xb3b8563c is pointing into the stack for thread: 0xb3a12800
ESP=0xb3b85420 is pointing into the stack for thread: 0xb3a12800
EBP=0xb3a12800 is a thread
ESI=0x0001 is an unknown value
EDI=0xb3b8563c is pointing into the stack for thread: 0xb3a12800


Stack: [0xb3b38000,0xb3b89000],  sp=0xb3b85420,  free space=309k
Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
V  [libjvm.so+0x2f6f77]  ObjectMonitor::exit(Thread*)+0x17

Java frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code)
v  ~RuntimeStub::monitorexit_nofpu Runtime1 stub
J  
sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Ljava/lang/String;Z)Ljava/lang/Class;

[error occurred during error reporting (printing Java stack), id 0xb]


---  P R O C E S S  ---

Java Threads: ( = current thread )
  0x09aa0c00 JavaThread process reaper daemon [_thread_in_native, id=1646, 
stack(0xb340d000,0xb345e000)]
  0xb3876400 JavaThread db-server daemon [_thread_in_vm, id=1642, 
stack(0xb345e000,0xb34af000)]
  0xb3879400 JavaThread db-timer daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1641, 
stack(0xb34af000,0xb350)]
=0xb3a12800 JavaThread unifi daemon [_thread_in_Java, id=1638, 
stack(0xb3b38000,0xb3b89000)]
  0xb3a14800 JavaThread system-timer daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1637, 
stack(0xb3ba,0xb3bf1000)]
  0xb693c400 JavaThread Low Memory Detector daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1635, 
stack(0xb3d3b000,0xb3d8c000)]
  0xb693a400 JavaThread C1 CompilerThread0 daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1634, 
stack(0xb3d8c000,0xb3e0d000)]
  0xb6938c00 JavaThread Signal Dispatcher daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1633, 
stack(0xb3e0d000,0xb3e5e000)]
  0xb6934800 JavaThread Finalizer daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1632, 
stack(0xb405e000,0xb40af000)]
  0xb6933000 JavaThread Reference Handler daemon [_thread_blocked, id=1631, 
stack(0xb40af000,0xb410)]
  0xb6905400 JavaThread launcher [_thread_blocked, id=1626, 
stack(0xb6a47000,0xb6a98000)]

Other Threads:
  0xb6931400 VMThread [stack: 0xb4245000,0xb42c6000] [id=1627]
  0xb6946c00 WatcherThread [stack: 0xb3cba000,0xb3d3b000] [id=1636]

VM state:not at safepoint (normal execution)

VM Mutex/Monitor currently owned by a thread: None

Heap
 def new generation   total 2368K, used 504K [0x4ea6, 0x4ecf, 
0x63fb)
  eden space 2112K,  11% used [0x4ea6, 0x4ea9e3e8, 0x4ec7)
  from space 256K, 100% used [0x4ec7, 0x4ecb, 0x4ecb)
  to   space 256K,   0% used [0x4ecb, 0x4ecb, 0x4ecf)
 tenured generation   total 5312K, used 4805K [0x63fb, 0x644e, 
0x8ea6)
   the space 5312K,  90% used [0x63fb, 0x644617d8, 0x64461800, 0x644e)
 compacting perm gen  total 12288K, used 9836K [0x8ea6, 0x8f66, 
0x92a6)
   the space 12288K,  80% used [0x8ea6, 0x8f3fb228, 0x8f3fb400,

[Bug 993728] Re: /dev/dvd disappears when a DVD is inserted

2012-07-10 Thread Charles Lindsay

Interestingly, my 70-persistent-cd.rules exists, it's just effectively
empty:

$ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-cd.rules 
# This file maintains persistent names for CD/DVD reader and writer devices.
# See udev(7) for syntax.
#
# Entries are automatically added by the 75-cd-aliases-generator.rules
# file; however you are also free to add your own entries provided you
# add the ENV{GENERATED}=1 flag to your own rules as well.

I wonder if Ubuntu didn't properly detect something when it was
installing itself?  For reference, here's the pertinent output of some
of the commands you mention, from my machine:

$ sudo lshw -C disk
...
  *-cdrom
   description: DVD-RAM writer
   product: BD-RE  WH10LS30
   vendor: HL-DT-ST
   physical id: 0.0.0
   bus info: scsi@3:0.0.0
   logical name: /dev/sr0
   version: 1.00
   capabilities: removable audio cd-r cd-rw dvd dvd-r dvd-ram
   configuration: ansiversion=5 status=nodisc

$ ls /dev/disk/by-path/
...  pci-:00:11.0-scsi-3:0:0:0

$ ls -Al /dev/disk/by-id/
...
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  9 Jul  9 23:38 ata-HL-DT-ST_BD-RE_WH10LS30_K97A3NA2854 
- ../../sr0

Does any of that matter?  I doubt it.  I'd have to check specifically,
but I'm fairly certain I get the same problem on all other machines I
use.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993728

Title:
  /dev/dvd disappears when a DVD is inserted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/993728/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 996906]

2012-05-14 Thread Charles Lindsay

I tried bumping default-fragment-size-msec up to 1000 and then 1.
It continues to skip.

Regarding latency, when default-fragment-size-msec was 1, I
noticed a line saying

( 124.922|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] sink.c: latency = 1339

in the log during a skip.  After the music was done skipping, I noticed
this:

( 155.288|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: Latency set to 20.00ms

Not sure which one to believe for latency.

Anyway, the problem persists regardless of the default-fragment-size-
msec config setting.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996906

Title:
  periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/996906/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 996906] [NEW] periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

2012-05-08 Thread Charles Lindsay

Public bug reported:

When running PulseAudio, if I'm playing music via any source (Exaile, Totem,
Flash in Firefox or Chromium, VLC, etc.) every few minutes the audio will skip
once or twice.  top doesn't show any process eating CPU any more when it
happens.  dmesg doesn't show anything.  Nothing else seems to be affected.  It
doesn't seem to happen regularly.

I just installed Ubuntu 12.04 from scratch (with pulseaudio 1:1.1-0ubuntu15),
but the same thing happened in 10.04 on the same hardware.  Uninstalling the
PulseAudio packages and going back to ALSA gives me no issues whatsoever, which
is how I know the issue is with PulseAudio.  I'm using my onboard audio device:

$ lspci | grep Audio
00:14.2 Audio device: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SBx00 Azalia (Intel
HDA)

Following mailing list instructions, pulseaudio - --log-time shows during a
skip:

( 684.030|   5.000) I: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: Underrun!
( 684.030|   0.000) I: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: Increasing minimal latency to
26.00 ms
( 684.030|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: Latency set to 26.00ms
( 684.030|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: hwbuf_unused=60952
( 684.030|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: setting avail_min=15944
( 684.030|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: Latency set to 26.00ms
( 684.030|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: hwbuf_unused=60952
( 684.030|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: setting avail_min=15944
( 684.031|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] protocol-native.c: Underrun on 'ALSA
Playback', 0 bytes in queue.
( 684.036|   0.004) D: [alsa-sink] protocol-native.c: Requesting rewind due to
end of underrun.
( 684.036|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: Requested to rewind 10940
bytes.
( 684.036|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: Limited to 3320 bytes.
( 684.036|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: before: 830
( 684.036|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: after: 830
( 684.036|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: Rewound 3320 bytes.
( 684.036|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] sink.c: Processing rewind...
( 684.036|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] sink.c: latency = 1337
( 684.036|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] sink-input.c: Have to rewind 3320 bytes on
render memblockq.
( 684.036|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] source.c: Processing rewind...
( 696.234|  12.197) I: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: Underrun!
( 696.234|   0.000) I: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: Increasing wakeup watermark to
15.99 ms
( 702.033|   5.799) I: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: Underrun!
( 702.033|   0.000) I: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: Increasing minimal latency to
36.00 ms
( 702.033|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: Latency set to 36.00ms
( 702.033|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: hwbuf_unused=59188
( 702.033|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: setting avail_min=15680
( 702.033|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: Latency set to 36.00ms
( 702.034|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: hwbuf_unused=59188
( 702.034|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] alsa-sink.c: setting avail_min=15680
( 702.034|   0.000) D: [alsa-sink] protocol-native.c: Underrun on 'ALSA
Playback', 0 bytes in queue.

...and it goes on.

The Underrun! messages alone happened a few times before, but it
didn't skip.

I'd like to use PulseAudio, but it's pretty annoying having audio skip all the
time.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: pulseaudio 1:1.1-0ubuntu15
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24.
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  toxite 2136 F pulseaudio
 /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p:   toxite 2136 F...m pulseaudio
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'SB'/'HDA ATI SB at 0xfe024000 irq 16'
   Mixer name   : 'Realtek ALC889'
   Components   : 'HDA:10ec0889,1458a102,0014'
   Controls  : 48
   Simple ctrls  : 22
Date: Tue May  8 21:45:17 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20120425)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: pulseaudio
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 12/03/2009
dmi.bios.vendor: Award Software International, Inc.
dmi.bios.version: F2
dmi.board.name: GA-790FXTA-UD5
dmi.board.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
dmi.board.version: x.x
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAwardSoftwareInternational,Inc.:bvrF2:bd12/03/2009:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnGA-790FXTA-UD5:pvr:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnGA-790FXTA-UD5:rvrx.x:cvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvr:
dmi.product.name: GA-790FXTA-UD5
dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.

** Affects: pulseaudio
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

-- 
You received

[Bug 996906] Re: periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

2012-05-08 Thread Charles Lindsay

** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #49608
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49608

** Also affects: pulseaudio via
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49608
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996906

Title:
  periodic audio skips with Intel HDA

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/996906/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 993758] Re: hardware errors every 300s

2012-05-04 Thread Charles Lindsay

Filed as upstream bug 43205:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43205

** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #43205
   http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43205

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993758

Title:
  hardware errors every 300s

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/993758/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 993758] [NEW] hardware errors every 300s

2012-05-03 Thread Charles Lindsay

Public bug reported:

Every 300s on the dot I get this in dmesg:

[  300.804131] [Hardware Error]: CPU:1  MC0_STATUS[-|CE|-|-|AddrV|CECC]: 
0x94674136
[  300.804147] [Hardware Error]:MC0_ADDR: 0x0003f2f7c5c0
[  300.804152] [Hardware Error]: Data Cache Error: during L1 linefill from L2.
[  300.804160] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L2, tx: DATA, mem-tx: DRD
[  300.804171] [Hardware Error]: CPU:1  MC1_STATUS[Over|CE|-|-|-]: 
0xd171
[  300.804178] [Hardware Error]: Instruction Cache Error: Copyback 
Parity/Victim error.
[  300.804184] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L1, tx: INSN, mem-tx: EV
[  300.804194] [Hardware Error]: CPU:1  MC2_STATUS[Over|CE|-|-|AddrV|CECC]: 
0xd400418a
[  300.804202] [Hardware Error]:MC2_ADDR: 0x0003e7d745c0
[  300.804207] [Hardware Error]: Bus Unit Error: SNP error during data copyback.
[  300.804213] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L2, tx: GEN, mem-tx: SNP

Same again at 600.804..., 900.804..., etc. for as long as my computer is
on.

cat /proc/cpuinfo says:

processor   : 0
vendor_id   : AuthenticAMD
cpu family  : 16
model   : 4
model name  : AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor
stepping: 2
microcode   : 0x186
cpu MHz : 800.000
cache size  : 512 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 4
core id : 0
cpu cores   : 4
apicid  : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov 
pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb 
rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nopl nonstop_tsc extd_apicid pni 
monitor cx16 popcnt lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a 
misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs skinit wdt npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save
bogomips: 6428.47
TLB size: 1024 4K pages
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate

(...and repeated for the next 3 cores.)

This only started happening with my recent upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04.  I'm
running linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic 3.2.0-24.37.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic 3.2.0-24.37
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24.
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/by-path', 
'/dev/snd/controlC0', '/dev/snd/hwC0D0', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D0c', 
'/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D1c', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D1p', 
'/dev/snd/pcmC0D2c', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1:
CRDA: Error: command ['iw', 'reg', 'get'] failed with exit code 1: nl80211 not 
found.
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'SB'/'HDA ATI SB at 0xfe024000 irq 16'
   Mixer name   : 'Realtek ALC889'
   Components   : 'HDA:10ec0889,1458a102,0014'
   Controls  : 48
   Simple ctrls  : 22
Date: Wed May  2 22:20:15 2012
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=078f1193-c57b-4c6f-a307-7eeb09d49fff
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20120425)
IwConfig:
 lono wireless extensions.
 
 eth1  no wireless extensions.
 
 eth0  no wireless extensions.
MachineType: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-790FXTA-UD5
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcFB: 0 VESA VGA
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.2.0-24-generic 
root=UUID=cde6d387-0099-461a-9b23-cfe68018e3f7 ro quiet splash irqpoll 
vt.handoff=7
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-restricted-modules-3.2.0-24-generic N/A
 linux-backports-modules-3.2.0-24-generic  N/A
 linux-firmware1.79
RfKill:
 0: hci0: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
SourcePackage: linux
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 12/03/2009
dmi.bios.vendor: Award Software International, Inc.
dmi.bios.version: F2
dmi.board.name: GA-790FXTA-UD5
dmi.board.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
dmi.board.version: x.x
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAwardSoftwareInternational,Inc.:bvrF2:bd12/03/2009:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnGA-790FXTA-UD5:pvr:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnGA-790FXTA-UD5:rvrx.x:cvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvr:
dmi.product.name: GA-790FXTA-UD5
dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993758

Title:
  hardware errors every 300s

To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 993758] Re: hardware errors every 300s

2012-05-03 Thread Charles Lindsay

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993758

Title:
  hardware errors every 300s

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/993758/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 993758] Re: hardware errors every 300s

2012-05-03 Thread Charles Lindsay

$ uname -rv
3.4.0-030400rc5-generic #201205011817 SMP Tue May 1 22:18:19 UTC 2012
$ dmesg | tail
[  599.832672] [Hardware Error]:MC0_ADDR: 0x00042fc8c5c0
[  599.832678] [Hardware Error]: Data Cache Error: during L1 linefill from L2.
[  599.832686] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L2, tx: DATA, mem-tx: DRD
[  599.832697] [Hardware Error]: CPU:1  MC1_STATUS[Over|CE|-|-|-]: 
0xd171
[  599.832704] [Hardware Error]: Instruction Cache Error: Copyback 
Parity/Victim error.
[  599.832711] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L1, tx: INSN, mem-tx: EV
[  599.832721] [Hardware Error]: CPU:1  MC2_STATUS[Over|CE|-|-|AddrV|CECC]: 
0xd400418a
[  599.832730] [Hardware Error]:MC2_ADDR: 0x00042fc8c5c0
[  599.832734] [Hardware Error]: Bus Unit Error: SNP error during data copyback.
[  599.832741] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L2, tx: GEN, mem-tx: SNP

Still happens with linux-
image-3.4.0-030400rc5-generic_3.4.0-030400rc5.201205011817_amd64!

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing
** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993758

Title:
  hardware errors every 300s

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/993758/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 993728] [NEW] /dev/dvd disappears when a DVD is inserted

2012-05-02 Thread Charles Lindsay

Public bug reported:

On a fresh boot, with no DVD inserted:

$ ls -Al /dev/dvd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 May  2 18:25 /dev/dvd - sr0

As soon as I insert a DVD:

$ ls -l /dev/dvd
ls: cannot access /dev/dvd: No such file or directory

The only new lines in dmesg are:

[   88.411709] UDF-fs: Partition marked readonly; forcing readonly mount
[   88.472834] UDF-fs: INFO Mounting volume 'WILLIAM_CASTLE_FILM_COLLECTION', 
timestamp 2009/08/19 19:32 (1e5c)

This is on a fully updated install of Ubuntu 12.04, with udev
175-0ubuntu9.

I don't want /dev/dvd to stop existing exactly when I need to use it.

** Affects: udev (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993728

Title:
  /dev/dvd disappears when a DVD is inserted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/993728/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 893199] Re: Dictionary Look Up Applet missing in Oneiric

2012-04-16 Thread Lindsay

If the applet has indeed gone away, perhaps it would be appropriate and
possible for the Ubuntu maintainers to drop the statement from the
gnome-dictionary package stating that one of the package components is
the missing applet.  This is a documentation bug and should perhaps be
re-assigned accordingly.   Documentation that's free from this sort of
error is more than just a wishlist thing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893199

Title:
  Dictionary Look Up Applet missing in Oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-dictionary/+bug/893199/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 945932] Re: Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in Ubuntu 12.04

2012-04-16 Thread Charles Lindsay

Some news: a recent update mostly hosed my 12.04 system.  (For the
record, I had installed anew on an empty partition, not upgraded.)  I
just did a full update and am happy to report that hcitool dev reports
the same thing that it did in xubuntu.

This means as far as I'm concerned, this bug is resolved.  Not sure if
the linux-firmware package was just affected by bug #714862, or wasn't
installed or what.  My installed version of linux-firmware is 1.79.

Note that my 12.04 system is hosed enough that I can't actually test
that the adapter works correctly, but I'm guessing that since hcitool
dev is reporting it (and lsusb no longer says no firmware) that it's
all gravy.

I'll leave this ticket open because I don't know if anything else needs
to happen on your end.  Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945932

Title:
  Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in Ubuntu 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/945932/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 945932] Re: Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in Ubuntu 12.04

2012-04-01 Thread Charles Lindsay

(I changed the title of the bug because it affects 12.04 on the whole,
not just beta 1.)

** Summary changed:

- Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in 12.04 beta 1
+ Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in Ubuntu 12.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945932

Title:
  Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in Ubuntu 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/945932/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 945932] Re: Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in 12.04 beta 1

2012-03-09 Thread Charles Lindsay

I did notice that if I boot to xubuntu, then restart (without powering
off) into ubuntu, ubuntu then detects it and it works fine.  I guess
that's consistent with the firmware being loaded by xubuntu but not
ubuntu?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945932

Title:
  Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in 12.04 beta 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/945932/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 945932] Re: Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in 12.04 beta 1

2012-03-07 Thread Charles Lindsay

A clue: lsusb in stock ubuntu 12.04 now seems to indicate it has no
firmware for the adapter:

Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0cf3:3000 Atheros Communications, Inc. AR3011
Bluetooth (no firmware)

(I don't remember if my first lsusb output was from 12.04 or 10.04 where
it was working.)

Could this just be that a required package isn't being installed by
default?  If so, which one, and why does xubuntu install it by default?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945932

Title:
  Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in 12.04 beta 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/945932/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 945932] Re: Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in 12.04 beta 1

2012-03-06 Thread Charles Lindsay

Freshly updated all packages; same issue.  As I said in the report, the
adapter isn't detected at all.  In the bluetooth manager tool it simply
says No Bluetooth adapters found.  Running 'sudo hcitool dev' comes
back with a line that just says Devices:.  I also noticed that the
next line after the above dmesg output is this (not sure if it's
relevant):

[   17.296954] usbcore: registered new interface driver ath3k

I'll update my xubuntu install later and give relevant dmesg output
there for comparison.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945932

Title:
  Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in 12.04 beta 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/945932/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 945932] Re: Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in 12.04 beta 1

2012-03-06 Thread Charles Lindsay

Updated the xubuntu install; still functions brilliantly.  Here's the
dmesg output from xubuntu that I think might be relevant:

[   18.352519] Bluetooth: Core ver 2.16
[   18.352538] Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized
[   18.352540] Bluetooth: HCI socket layer initialized
[   18.352541] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized
[   18.352545] Bluetooth: SCO socket layer initialized
[   18.390994] Bluetooth: Generic Bluetooth USB driver ver 0.6
[   18.391138] usbcore: registered new interface driver btusb
[   20.705484] Bluetooth: RFCOMM TTY layer initialized
[   20.705488] Bluetooth: RFCOMM socket layer initialized
[   20.705489] Bluetooth: RFCOMM ver 1.11
[   21.318906] Bluetooth: BNEP (Ethernet Emulation) ver 1.3
[   21.318909] Bluetooth: BNEP filters: protocol multicast

hcitool dev reports:
Devices:
hci000:02:72:1E:60:4A

lsusb reports:
Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0cf3:3005 Atheros Communications, Inc. AR3011 Bluetooth

** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945932

Title:
  Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in 12.04 beta 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/945932/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 945932] [NEW] Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in 12.04 beta 1

2012-03-03 Thread Charles Lindsay

Public bug reported:

Just installed 12.04 beta 1 on a spare partition, and noticed that my
bluetooth adapter (that works flawlessly in 10.04) isn't being detected.
Here's some potentially relevant dmesg output in 12.04 beta 1:

[   22.243497] Bluetooth: Core ver 2.16
[   22.243517] Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized
[   22.243519] Bluetooth: HCI socket layer initialized
[   22.243521] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized
[   22.243524] Bluetooth: SCO socket layer initialized
[   22.243686] Bluetooth: Atheros AR30xx firmware driver ver 1.0
[   22.391766] Bluetooth: BNEP (Ethernet Emulation) ver 1.3
[   22.391769] Bluetooth: BNEP filters: protocol multicast
[   22.433758] Bluetooth: RFCOMM TTY layer initialized
[   22.433763] Bluetooth: RFCOMM socket layer initialized
[   22.433764] Bluetooth: RFCOMM ver 1.11
[   27.268814] Bluetooth: Can't change to loading configuration err
[   27.268837] ath3k: probe of 3-2:1.0 failed with error -110

I'll note that on xubuntu 12.04 beta 1, there is no issue; the adapter
is found and functions correctly.

Here is I believe the relevant line from lsusb:

Bus 003 Device 003: ID 0cf3:3002 Atheros Communications, Inc.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945932

Title:
  Atheros USB bluetooth adapter not detected in 12.04 beta 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/945932/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 893199] [NEW] Dictionary Look Up Applet missing in Oneiric

2011-11-21 Thread Lindsay

Public bug reported:

The dictionary look up applet seems to be totally missing in 11.10!
This was one of my most-used utilities.  The package description for
gnome-dictionary says that the applet is included it it, but I can find
nothing relating to the applet in the listing of the package contents.
What happened???  I certainly hope an executive decision wasn't made to
deep-six this applet, which has been one of my favorites for many years.

** Affects: gnome-utils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893199

Title:
  Dictionary Look Up Applet missing in Oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-utils/+bug/893199/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 823878] Re: bind interfaces only requires a manual change to /etc/init/smbd.conf

2011-10-09 Thread camden lindsay

To be clear and recap--

smb.conf has the following
interfaces = eth0

Static IP was assigned via network manager.

smbd would not start up-- as per
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849
(open_socket_smbd fail)

As per this bug (the one i am currently updating), i edited the startup in 
/etc/init/smbd.conf to be the following
start on (local-filesystems and net-device-up IFACE=eth0)

smbd started without a problem, but nmbd no longer started at boot.

Following the debug tips in the bug 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/samba/+bug/596064
I identified that nmbd was not starting because /var/run/samba did not exist.  
I added 'mkdir -p /var/run/samba' to the pre-start script of 
/etc/init/nmbd.conf  as suggested by bug 596064, and now everything starts up 
as expected.

hope this explains it..

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823878

Title:
  bind interfaces only requires a manual change to /etc/init/smbd.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/823878/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 823878] Re: bind interfaces only requires a manual change to /etc/init/smbd.conf

2011-10-09 Thread camden lindsay

To be clear and recap--

smb.conf has the following
interfaces = eth0

Static IP was assigned via network manager.

smbd would not start up-- as per
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849
(open_socket_smbd fail)

As per this bug (the one i am currently updating), i edited the startup in 
/etc/init/smbd.conf to be the following
start on (local-filesystems and net-device-up IFACE=eth0)

smbd started without a problem, but nmbd no longer started at boot.

Following the debug tips in the bug 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/samba/+bug/596064
I identified that nmbd was not starting because /var/run/samba did not exist.  
I added 'mkdir -p /var/run/samba' to the pre-start script of 
/etc/init/nmbd.conf  as suggested by bug 596064, and now everything starts up 
as expected.

hope this explains it..

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823878

Title:
  bind interfaces only requires a manual change to /etc/init/smbd.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/823878/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 823878] Re: bind interfaces only requires a manual change to /etc/init/smbd.conf

After modifying 'net-device-up IFACE=eth0' to the 'start on' clause, i now am 
running into the problem that /var/run/samba does not exist, as described here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/samba/+bug/596064

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823878

Title:
  bind interfaces only requires a manual change to /etc/init/smbd.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/823878/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 823878] Re: bind interfaces only requires a manual change to /etc/init/smbd.conf

I'm sorry i wasn't clear in #6 -- samba now starts on boot, but nmbd
does not, for the reasons indicated in the above bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823878

Title:
  bind interfaces only requires a manual change to /etc/init/smbd.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/823878/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 596064] Re: nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart

I just hit this bug, after updating samba to start after eth0 was up because of 
bug 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/823878


dylan@strut-google-server:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release 
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS
dylan@strut-google-server:~$ cat /tmp/upstart-nmbd.log 
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
rlimit_max: rlimit_max (1024) below minimum Windows limit (16384)
Processing section [Strut Share]
Processing section [printers]
Processing section [print$]
Loaded services file OK.
ERROR: lock directory /var/run/samba does not exist
ERROR: pid directory /var/run/samba does not exist
dylan@strut-google-server:~$

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064

Title:
  nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/596064/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 823878] Re: bind interfaces only requires a manual change to /etc/init/smbd.conf

After modifying 'net-device-up IFACE=eth0' to the 'start on' clause, i now am 
running into the problem that /var/run/samba does not exist, as described here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/samba/+bug/596064

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823878

Title:
  bind interfaces only requires a manual change to /etc/init/smbd.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/823878/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 823878] Re: bind interfaces only requires a manual change to /etc/init/smbd.conf

I'm sorry i wasn't clear in #6 -- samba now starts on boot, but nmbd
does not, for the reasons indicated in the above bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823878

Title:
  bind interfaces only requires a manual change to /etc/init/smbd.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/823878/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 596064] Re: nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart

I just hit this bug, after updating samba to start after eth0 was up because of 
bug 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/823878


dylan@strut-google-server:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release 
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS
dylan@strut-google-server:~$ cat /tmp/upstart-nmbd.log 
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
rlimit_max: rlimit_max (1024) below minimum Windows limit (16384)
Processing section [Strut Share]
Processing section [printers]
Processing section [print$]
Loaded services file OK.
ERROR: lock directory /var/run/samba does not exist
ERROR: pid directory /var/run/samba does not exist
dylan@strut-google-server:~$

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064

Title:
  nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/596064/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 836849] Re: Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

** Attachment added: log.nmbd of same startup showingnmbd starting with no 
issue when network down
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+attachment/2347558/+files/log.nmbd

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849

Title:
  Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 836849] Re: Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

** Attachment added: smb.conf which is exhibiting the problem
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+attachment/2347559/+files/smb.conf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849

Title:
  Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 374589] Re: Samba fails to start at boot when not connected to network (and specific interfaces are configured)

It appears this and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849  are one in
the same, although the bug listed here is because the static ip
assignments are done through networkmanager...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374589

Title:
  Samba fails to start at boot when not connected to network (and
  specific interfaces are configured)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/374589/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 836849] Re: Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

Okay, let me see if i can touch on all of your points here.

I do not have  IFACE=eth0 in the start on' clause of /etc/init/smb.conf

However, i do have the following line in /etc/samba/smb.conf, and it does not 
'just work' as you indicate it should, unfortunately. :(
interfaces = eth0  


Note that this bug is the same as 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/374589 essentially.


Attached are single startup /var/log/samba/log.smbd, /var/log/samba/log.nmbd, 
and /etc/samba/smb.conf, as well as a successful startup of smbd after the 
system is up and running.

Note the following in log.smbd:

[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  2] lib/interface.c:389(interpret_interface)
  interpret_interface: Can't find address for eth0
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] lib/interface.c:550(load_interfaces)
  WARNING: no network interfaces found
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] smbd/server.c:1115(main)
  standard input is not a socket, assuming -D option
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] smbd/server.c:616(open_sockets_smbd)
  open_sockets_smbd: No sockets available to bind to.
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] smbd/server.c:837(exit_server_common)
  ===
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] smbd/server.c:839(exit_server_common)
  Abnormal server exit: open_sockets_smbd() failed
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] smbd/server.c:840(exit_server_common)
  ===
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] lib/util.c:1584(log_stack_trace)
  BACKTRACE: 6 stack frames:
   #0 smbd(log_stack_trace+0x1a) [0x7fd9fbc2695a]
   #1 smbd(+0x5a9f90) [0x7fd9fbeb5f90]
   #2 smbd(+0x5aa161) [0x7fd9fbeb6161]
   #3 smbd(main+0x90d) [0x7fd9fbeb6ebd]
   #4 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd) [0x7fd9f83b3c4d]
   #5 smbd(+0xc0a49) [0x7fd9fb9cca49]
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] lib/fault.c:326(dump_core)
  dumping core in /var/log/samba/cores/smbd


** Attachment added: log.smbd showing core dump when it cannot bind to a 
socket because no ethernet device found
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+attachment/2347554/+files/log.smbd

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849

Title:
  Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 836849] Re: Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

log.smbd after machine and interface are up, running service smdb start


** Attachment added: log.smbd after machine and interface are up, running 
service smdb start
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+attachment/2347602/+files/log.smbd.successful

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849

Title:
  Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 836849] Re: Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

Okay, let me see if i can touch on all of your points here.

I do not have  IFACE=eth0 in the start on' clause of /etc/init/smb.conf

However, i do have the following line in /etc/samba/smb.conf, and it does not 
'just work' as you indicate it should, unfortunately. :(
interfaces = eth0  


Note that this bug is the same as 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/374589 essentially.


Attached are single startup /var/log/samba/log.smbd, /var/log/samba/log.nmbd, 
and /etc/samba/smb.conf, as well as a successful startup of smbd after the 
system is up and running.

Note the following in log.smbd:

[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  2] lib/interface.c:389(interpret_interface)
  interpret_interface: Can't find address for eth0
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] lib/interface.c:550(load_interfaces)
  WARNING: no network interfaces found
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] smbd/server.c:1115(main)
  standard input is not a socket, assuming -D option
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] smbd/server.c:616(open_sockets_smbd)
  open_sockets_smbd: No sockets available to bind to.
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] smbd/server.c:837(exit_server_common)
  ===
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] smbd/server.c:839(exit_server_common)
  Abnormal server exit: open_sockets_smbd() failed
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] smbd/server.c:840(exit_server_common)
  ===
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] lib/util.c:1584(log_stack_trace)
  BACKTRACE: 6 stack frames:
   #0 smbd(log_stack_trace+0x1a) [0x7fd9fbc2695a]
   #1 smbd(+0x5a9f90) [0x7fd9fbeb5f90]
   #2 smbd(+0x5aa161) [0x7fd9fbeb6161]
   #3 smbd(main+0x90d) [0x7fd9fbeb6ebd]
   #4 /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd) [0x7fd9f83b3c4d]
   #5 smbd(+0xc0a49) [0x7fd9fb9cca49]
[2011/09/03 01:45:29,  0] lib/fault.c:326(dump_core)
  dumping core in /var/log/samba/cores/smbd


** Attachment added: log.smbd showing core dump when it cannot bind to a 
socket because no ethernet device found
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+attachment/2347554/+files/log.smbd

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849

Title:
  Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 836849] Re: Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

** Attachment added: smb.conf which is exhibiting the problem
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+attachment/2347559/+files/smb.conf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849

Title:
  Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 836849] Re: Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

log.smbd after machine and interface are up, running service smdb start


** Attachment added: log.smbd after machine and interface are up, running 
service smdb start
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+attachment/2347602/+files/log.smbd.successful

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849

Title:
  Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 836849] Re: Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

** Attachment added: log.nmbd of same startup showingnmbd starting with no 
issue when network down
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+attachment/2347558/+files/log.nmbd

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849

Title:
  Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 374589] Re: Samba fails to start at boot when not connected to network (and specific interfaces are configured)

It appears this and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849  are one in
the same, although the bug listed here is because the static ip
assignments are done through networkmanager...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374589

Title:
  Samba fails to start at boot when not connected to network (and
  specific interfaces are configured)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/374589/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 836849] Re: Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

** Attachment added: daemon.log exhibiting samba starting up before ethernet 
device ready with statically assigned address through networkmanager
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849/+attachment/2330756/+files/daemon.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849

Title:
  Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 836849] [NEW] Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

Public bug reported:

dylan@strut-google-server:/var/log/samba$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS
Release:10.04

___


dylan@strut-google-server:/var/log/samba$ apt-cache policy samba
samba:
  Installed: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7
  Candidate: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7
  Version table:
 *** 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages
_

Expect that samba will start up provided the interface assigned in it's
config has a static IP address.

Instead, Samba starts before the network manager manages to set up the static 
IP address on the machine.
See attached log file.

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849

Title:
  Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 836849] Re: Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

** Attachment added: daemon.log exhibiting samba starting up before ethernet 
device ready with statically assigned address through networkmanager
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849/+attachment/2330756/+files/daemon.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836849

Title:
  Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/836849/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 836849] [NEW] Samba starts before static IPs set in network manager