[Bug 502084] [NEW] Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince The fontspec documentation for XeTeX (available at CTAN at http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/xetex/latex/fontspec/) does not render correctly in Evince. At some point in the past (that is, at least two releases ago) it worked just fine. Scribd, the Web viewer for documents like this, renders the file just fine (and Evince still renders it incorrectly downloading it from there). I will try to setup another version of Ubuntu in a VM and find the last version that worked sometime today if I have the chance (though if someone is running an older version of Ubuntu that comes across this bug, a works/doesn't work result would be nice). Look on page 3, there is a lot of blank space where there should be text. Looking at it on Scribed at the same spot shows what it should appear as. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 CheckboxSubmission: 34d1fedb40bfa93f2c7055fdb74261e6 CheckboxSystem: e704f33cc0866ff0f0256a33de39ea1c Date: Fri Jan 1 09:35:00 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release amd64 (20091027) NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: evince 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.53-generic SourcePackage: evince Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic x86_64 ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 502084] Re: Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37342271/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: KernLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37342272/KernLog.txt ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37342273/RelatedPackageVersions.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37342274/XsessionErrors.txt -- Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 502084] Re: Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file
Interesting. My thinking then is that the poppler-data package shouldn't be a separate package at all. I suspect that upstream they are shipped together as a single thing? Of course, another way to resolve that logical dependency is to just have poppler depend on poppler-data. I wonder if that was the case in a previous version of Ubuntu? --- Mike On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, madbiologist s.j.tur...@uq.net.au wrote: Here is the corresponding output of pdffonts after installing poppler- data. Note that the error messages are gone, which correlates with the correct rendering of the document. ** Attachment added: pdffonts_output-after.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37343716/pdffonts_output-after.txt -- Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502084 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “poppler” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: evince The fontspec documentation for XeTeX (available at CTAN at http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/xetex/latex/fontspec/) does not render correctly in Evince. At some point in the past (that is, at least two releases ago) it worked just fine. Scribd, the Web viewer for documents like this, renders the file just fine (and Evince still renders it incorrectly downloading it from there). I will try to setup another version of Ubuntu in a VM and find the last version that worked sometime today if I have the chance (though if someone is running an older version of Ubuntu that comes across this bug, a works/doesn't work result would be nice). Look on page 3, there is a lot of blank space where there should be text. Looking at it on Scribed at the same spot shows what it should appear as. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 CheckboxSubmission: 34d1fedb40bfa93f2c7055fdb74261e6 CheckboxSystem: e704f33cc0866ff0f0256a33de39ea1c Date: Fri Jan 1 09:35:00 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release amd64 (20091027) NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: evince 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.53-generic SourcePackage: evince Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic x86_64 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/502084/+subscribe -- Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 502084] Re: Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file
Hrm. Installing poppler-data did _not_ fix the issue for me. I still have lots of blank space, in the same spots. Note that this is on Karmic. On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, madbiologist s.j.tur...@uq.net.au wrote: Here is the corresponding output of pdffonts after installing poppler- data. Note that the error messages are gone, which correlates with the correct rendering of the document. ** Attachment added: pdffonts_output-after.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37343716/pdffonts_output-after.txt -- Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502084 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “poppler” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: evince The fontspec documentation for XeTeX (available at CTAN at http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/xetex/latex/fontspec/) does not render correctly in Evince. At some point in the past (that is, at least two releases ago) it worked just fine. Scribd, the Web viewer for documents like this, renders the file just fine (and Evince still renders it incorrectly downloading it from there). I will try to setup another version of Ubuntu in a VM and find the last version that worked sometime today if I have the chance (though if someone is running an older version of Ubuntu that comes across this bug, a works/doesn't work result would be nice). Look on page 3, there is a lot of blank space where there should be text. Looking at it on Scribed at the same spot shows what it should appear as. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 CheckboxSubmission: 34d1fedb40bfa93f2c7055fdb74261e6 CheckboxSystem: e704f33cc0866ff0f0256a33de39ea1c Date: Fri Jan 1 09:35:00 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release amd64 (20091027) NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: evince 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.53-generic SourcePackage: evince Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic x86_64 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/502084/+subscribe -- Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 502084] Re: Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file
Never mind. I was an idiot and didn't restart Evince. ID10T; PEBKAC. Oops. Sorry for the noise. On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Michael Trausch m...@trausch.us wrote: Hrm. Installing poppler-data did _not_ fix the issue for me. I still have lots of blank space, in the same spots. Note that this is on Karmic. On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, madbiologist s.j.tur...@uq.net.au wrote: Here is the corresponding output of pdffonts after installing poppler- data. Note that the error messages are gone, which correlates with the correct rendering of the document. ** Attachment added: pdffonts_output-after.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37343716/pdffonts_output-after.txt -- Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502084 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “poppler” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: evince The fontspec documentation for XeTeX (available at CTAN at http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/xetex/latex/fontspec/) does not render correctly in Evince. At some point in the past (that is, at least two releases ago) it worked just fine. Scribd, the Web viewer for documents like this, renders the file just fine (and Evince still renders it incorrectly downloading it from there). I will try to setup another version of Ubuntu in a VM and find the last version that worked sometime today if I have the chance (though if someone is running an older version of Ubuntu that comes across this bug, a works/doesn't work result would be nice). Look on page 3, there is a lot of blank space where there should be text. Looking at it on Scribed at the same spot shows what it should appear as. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 CheckboxSubmission: 34d1fedb40bfa93f2c7055fdb74261e6 CheckboxSystem: e704f33cc0866ff0f0256a33de39ea1c Date: Fri Jan 1 09:35:00 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release amd64 (20091027) NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: evince 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.53-generic SourcePackage: evince Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic x86_64 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/502084/+subscribe -- Evince fails to read the fontspec.pdf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 493679] Re: Description in DEB contains '*' symbol, which makes Software Center parse it incorrectly
This is a bug in Software Center; it should use a better algorithm for determining whether or not the * character is being used as a bullet or not. In the case of the current version of the AllTray source package, the problem is that the * character is a footnote marker, not a bullet character. ** Also affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: alltray (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Description in DEB contains '*' symbol, which makes Software Center parse it incorrectly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493679 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 451893] Re: PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log)
Hrm... I wonder if maybe the problem has anything to do with the fact that the cards have hardware mixing and can be opened multiple times? On Nov 29, 2009 7:05 PM, Dan McCombs overri...@gmail.com wrote: I can confirm the file handle leak on /dev/snd/timer only happens if I have the Analog Surround 5.1 Output Profile selected instead of Analog Stereo Duplex. Three file handles to /dev/snd/timer are left open each time a sound is played with the 5.1 profile: overri...@citadel-station:~$ ls -l /proc/$(pgrep pulseaudio)/fd|grep timer | wc -l 12 overri...@citadel-station:~$ ls -l /proc/$(pgrep pulseaudio)/fd|grep timer | wc -l 15 overri...@citadel-station:~$ ls -l /proc/$(pgrep pulseaudio)/fd|grep timer | wc -l 18 This using a Sound Blaster Audigy sound card. -Dan -- PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log) https://bugs.l... -- PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 481186] Re: [Hardy] Cannot dock more than one Prism app using AllTray
Okay, so I was confused here for a bit, simply because it appears that (at least in Karmic) separate Prism processes are only separate if they represent different applications or so and the task boundaries depend on the INI file used to instantiate Prism. For example, Prism will start two processes for the following two commands because they are using different INI files: prism -override /home/mbt/.webapps/google.ta...@prism.app/override.ini -webapp google.ta...@prism.app prism -override /home/mbt/.webapps/launch...@prism.app/override.ini -webapp launch...@prism.app However, if you try to run either of those again while the first one is running, the child process dies unexpectedly (from AllTray's point of view) and there is nothing for it to grab onto; what Prism is doing is instead sending a message of some sort to the first Prism instance, and it then spawns a new window. There is no way for AllTray to catch that. (Note that in new versions of AllTray, such as in 0.7.4dev, the second window will be caught by the first AllTray and it will use the same tray icon and dock both, since it is a single application; however, that version of AllTray does not yet have all the functionality of old AllTray and it's not yet ready for general public usage. I hope to make a release soon that will be suitable for inclusion in distributions such as Ubuntu and has all the features of old AllTray, but I cannot yet name a time when that will happen.) It would seem that you can work around this if you use the Prism application to create two separate INI files and then launch them both. I'm not sure if that can be done the same way in Hardy as it is done on Karmic, but if it is, you can do so by creating two desktop launchers from the prism menu option (in Applications→Internet) and then open the properties of the desktop file and use the commands that are there to launch them. I'm going to guess that this behavior is by design in Prism. There isn't anything that can be done in AllTray to fix that situation, unfortunately. I will, however, create a FAQ for AllTray in Launchpad Questions so that at the very least the issue is known and there is a workaround available generally. ** Changed in: alltray (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- [Hardy] Cannot dock more than one Prism app using AllTray https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 481186] Re: [Hardy] Cannot dock more than one Prism app using AllTray
Hi, thanks for reporting this bug. Can you include debug output from the first AllTray session that works as expected and also from the second session that doesn't work? Are you running the same prism commandline for both? Are you able to attach to the second one using click mode? Also, if you're starting AllTray+Prism via .desktop files, can you attach those to the bug report as well? Thanks! ** Changed in: alltray (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- [Hardy] Cannot dock more than one Prism app using AllTray https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455779] Re: SB Audigy: Bad audio quality when told to use all 5.1 channels
Starting PulseAudio manually with PULSE_NO_SIMD=1 clears the sound up a *lot*. However, every time a new sound is played, it reverts to stereo. Well, not completely; it reverts to 2 channels, but not the same two channels that the sound card uses in stereo mode. Good enough to color me completely confused. So, every time I start playing something like netradio, I have to open the hardware properties by right-clicking on the volume control, and toggling it away from 5.1 and then back to 5.1 in order to get the sound to work right. System sounds only work properly when a netradio stream is playing; as soon as the sound system stops playing sound completely, it stops properly outputting audio. That is, however, bug 406582 (or rather, the part of it that still is an issue on Karmic). -- SB Audigy: Bad audio quality when told to use all 5.1 channels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455779 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318156] Re: smbc crashes due to buffer overflow
This still occurs in Karmic. I have confirmed the bug; will attach a core momentarily. ** Changed in: smbc (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- smbc crashes due to buffer overflow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318156] Re: smbc crashes due to buffer overflow
Here's the core file; it was generated from gdb immediately after the program received SIGABRT. ** Attachment added: core dump (from gdb, Karmic) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35454438/core.12976 -- smbc crashes due to buffer overflow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318156] Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35454631/Dependencies.txt -- smbc crashes due to buffer overflow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318156] apport-collect data
Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: smbc 1.2.2-3 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) SHELL=/bin/zsh LANG=en_US.UTF-8 Uname: Linux 2.6.31.5-bfs303 x86_64 UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout disk libvirtd lpadmin plugdev sambashare -- smbc crashes due to buffer overflow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318156] XsessionErrors.txt
** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35454633/XsessionErrors.txt ** Tags added: apport-collected -- smbc crashes due to buffer overflow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318156] Re: smbc crashes due to buffer overflow
I have gotten the software to build now such that it does not crash (it looks like the hardcoded -O3 and a missing header include directive in the main .c file might be responsible), but it does not exactly appear to work, either. It does appear that this program needs to be seriously cleaned up, though and that I have not the time for, unfortunately. -- smbc crashes due to buffer overflow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455779] Re: PulseAudio completely ruins all audio
Here is the log. I don't know how closely you'll be able to follow what I did, but in case it helps: 1. I started PA for logging, and started Banshee. 2. I then started playing a high-quality netradio stream. 3. The sound at this point was only coming out of a couple of channels, so I opened the volume mixer and switched Hardware to 4.1 and then back to 5.1. Then, all speakers work again. 4. The sound coming out of the speakers through the whole process was AM quality. The stream itself plays perfectly on other computers and through ALSA when the netradio stream is played via mpg123 when PA is dead. 5. I then stopped playback, and started it again. Repeat steps 2 through 4. 6. I then stopped playback and killed PA using pulseaudio -k from another terminal. So, here's the result. ** Attachment added: PA Verbose Log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34977513/pulseverbose.log -- PulseAudio completely ruins all audio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455779 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455779] Re: PulseAudio completely ruins all audio
Installing that had no effect. I hold to the assertion that the bug *must* be in PulseAudio: If I disable PulseAudio completely and play sound directly using ALSA, it sounds *just* fine. The only problem is that most ALSA applications do not output 5.1 channels directly, and PulseAudio is required in order to get all of my speakers to output sound correctly, at least so far as I am aware. The ALSA configuration that I used in the past to do 5.1 sound without PulseAudio does not seem to work any longer in Karmic. -- PulseAudio completely ruins all audio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455779 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297245] Re: [i965] Dell Studio 15 White Screen on X startup
Why is the regression being discussed here? There is a bug report open for the regression at bug 460664, for Karmic. Once a bug is closed/released/whatever, if the bug is reintroduced it's a regression and that is a new bug (which should, of course, reference what the regression is of)... -- [i965] Dell Studio 15 White Screen on X startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461438] Re: An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers)
This is the core dump of the upstart process that is failing. The PID of the core file (27138) is the PID of upstart as seen outside the container; within the container, it has PID 1. ** Attachment added: Core dump (from gcore) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34492692/core.27138.gz -- An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461438] Re: An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers)
r...@spicerack:~# exec /sbin/init -v Loading configuration from /etc/init.conf Loading configuration from /etc/init init: Handling startup event init: mountall goal changed from stop to start init: mountall state changed from waiting to starting init: hostname goal changed from stop to start init: hostname state changed from waiting to starting init: Handling starting event init: hwclock goal changed from stop to start init: hwclock state changed from waiting to starting init: Handling starting event init: hostname state changed from starting to pre-start init: hostname state changed from pre-start to spawned init: hostname main process (11) init: hostname state changed from spawned to post-start init: hostname state changed from post-start to running init: Handling starting event init: hwclock state changed from starting to pre-start init: hwclock state changed from pre-start to spawned init: hwclock main process (12) init: hwclock state changed from spawned to post-start init: hwclock state changed from post-start to running init: Handling started event init: Handling started event init: hostname main process (11) exited normally init: hostname goal changed from start to stop init: hostname state changed from running to stopping init: Handling stopping event init: hostname state changed from stopping to killed init: hostname state changed from killed to post-stop init: hostname state changed from post-stop to waiting init: Handling stopped event init: hwclock main process (12) exited normally init: hwclock goal changed from start to stop init: hwclock state changed from running to stopping init: Handling stopping event init: hwclock state changed from stopping to killed init: hwclock state changed from killed to post-stop init: hwclock state changed from post-stop to waiting init: Handling stopped event init: mountall state changed from starting to pre-start init: mountall state changed from pre-start to spawned init: mountall main process (13) init: mountall main process (13) executable changed init: Connection from private client init: mountall main process (13) became new process (14) init: mountall main process (14) executable changed init: mountall state changed from spawned to post-start init: mountall state changed from post-start to running init: Handling started event init: Handling mount event init: Handling mount event init: Handling mount event init: Handling mount event init: Handling mount event -- An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461438] Re: An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers)
Using the following script seems to make the system work just fine: Oct 27 13:13:44 Keybuk initctl emit virtual-filesystems Oct 27 13:13:46 Keybuk initctl emit local-filesystems Oct 27 13:13:48 Keybuk initctl emit remote-filesystems Oct 27 13:13:55 Keybuk initctl emit filesystem Oct 27 13:13:56 Keybuk exit 0 As I have the container running now, which I need, I'm good. I'm going to create a new container later today to replicate the setup and attempt to continue troubleshooting. -- An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 460925] Re: Kernel log message corruption due to incomplete /proc separation
I should note that this is in Karmic, fully updated as of 05:19 on 26-Oct-2009, EDT (GMT-0400). ** Visibility changed to: Public -- Kernel log message corruption due to incomplete /proc separation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460925 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461438] [NEW] mountall fails under lxc (linux containers)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall When running latest Karmic under lxc (linux containers), the startup yields: m...@saffron:/srv/vm/trausch.us/spicerack.trausch.us$ sudo lxc-start --name spicerack.trausch.us mount: mount point /dev/shm does not exist mountall: mount /dev/shm [19] terminated with status 32 mountall: Filesystem could not be mounted: /dev/shm mount: mount point /dev/shm does not exist mountall: mount /dev/shm [23] terminated with status 32 mountall: Filesystem could not be mounted: /dev/shm At this point, the container hangs and proceeds no further. This did not happen with Karmic from ~70 days ago. This is with mountall 1.0 in Karmic. ** Affects: mountall (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- mountall fails under lxc (linux containers) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461438] Re: mountall fails under lxc (linux containers)
To reproduce: # Install Ubuntu server, Karmic. # Install linux containers (lxc). # Debootstrap a new Karmic directory that will be used for the container. # When the debootstrap is complete, setup an lxc.conf and create the vm with lxc-create. # Start the vm with lxc-start. # The VM will never truly start; init is as far as it goes. I'm trying to capture some debugging data, as this is impacting me and I need it fixed like, well, yesterday ;-). However, I'm having an awfully hard time getting anywhere that makes sense. -- mountall fails under lxc (linux containers) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461438] Re: An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers)
This is looking more and more like an upstart failure at early bootup. Will attach an strace that shows where the boot process ends momentarily. ** Summary changed: - mountall fails under lxc (linux containers) + An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers) ** Also affects: upstart (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461438] Re: An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers)
This is the output from strace for the upstart process which is fork'd/exec'd from lxc. I will attach output from Upstart when run by way of exec init -v from a shell whose PID is 1 in a few minutes. ** Attachment added: lxc001.dbg.31735 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34437947/lxc001.dbg.31735 -- An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461438] Re: An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers)
r...@saffron:~# lxc-start --name spicerack.trausch.us /bin/bash r...@spicerack:~# exec init -v Loading configuration from /etc/init.conf Loading configuration from /etc/init init: Handling startup event init: mountall goal changed from stop to start init: mountall state changed from waiting to starting init: hostname goal changed from stop to start init: hostname state changed from waiting to starting init: Handling starting event init: hwclock goal changed from stop to start init: hwclock state changed from waiting to starting init: Handling starting event init: hostname state changed from starting to pre-start init: hostname state changed from pre-start to spawned init: hostname main process (11) init: hostname state changed from spawned to post-start init: hostname state changed from post-start to running init: Handling starting event init: hwclock state changed from starting to pre-start init: hwclock state changed from pre-start to spawned init: hwclock main process (12) init: hwclock state changed from spawned to post-start init: hwclock state changed from post-start to running init: Handling started event init: Handling started event init: hostname main process (11) exited normally init: hostname goal changed from start to stop init: hostname state changed from running to stopping init: Handling stopping event init: hostname state changed from stopping to killed init: hostname state changed from killed to post-stop init: hostname state changed from post-stop to waiting init: Handling stopped event init: hwclock main process (12) exited normally init: hwclock goal changed from start to stop init: hwclock state changed from running to stopping init: Handling stopping event init: hwclock state changed from stopping to killed init: hwclock state changed from killed to post-stop init: hwclock state changed from post-stop to waiting init: Handling stopped event init: mountall state changed from starting to pre-start init: mountall state changed from pre-start to spawned init: mountall main process (13) init: mountall main process (13) executable changed init: mountall main process (13) exited normally init: mountall goal changed from start to stop init: mountall state changed from spawned to stopping init: Handling stopping event init: mountall state changed from stopping to killed init: mountall state changed from killed to post-stop init: mountall post-stop process (14) init: mountall post-stop process (14) exited normally init: mountall state changed from post-stop to waiting init: Handling stopped event This is where upstart stops when booting within LXC on an Ubuntu server, on Karmic. -- An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461438] Re: An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers)
If it matters, I'm on #upstart on FreeNode if anyone comes across this and wishes to have me try to collect information in some way in near- real-time. -- An early boot component fails under lxc (linux containers) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 460153] Re: mountall on karmic server install fails
As this is affecting a server installation (and does not appear to be affecting my desktop installation, though I suppose it might be a problem there, too) I have subscribed the Ubuntu Server Team. -- mountall on karmic server install fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 456806] Re: mountall vomits a shell onto virtual console when you run vi
Please see bug 460153 for additional information. This causes some strange other issues that prevent me from being able to use 9.10 RC on a server. -- mountall vomits a shell onto virtual console when you run vi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 460153] Re: mountall on karmic server install fails
A-ha. I have found a way to reliably trigger the failure of mountall. Install a bare server using Karmic, update it fully. Then, on that server, try to view a man page on the console. Arrow keys will appear to not work correctly. Install emacs-snapshot-nox on that server. Attempt to arrow around. The following text will then display: mountall: Cancelled General error mounting filesystems. A maintenance shell will now be started. CONTROL-D will terminate this shell re-try. r...@saffron:~# _ Now, note that in Emacs, this will not appear with the newlines correctly displayed; it will clobber the terminal and the text shown is stair stepped. Something very wrong is going on here, this bug should be critical for release. ** Tags added: critical mountall server -- mountall on karmic server install fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 460153] Re: mountall on karmic server install fails
After mountall fails, the keyboard works to control things like man page viewing again. This is a highly unusual bug. -- mountall on karmic server install fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 460153] Re: mountall on karmic server install fails
As this is affecting a server installation (and does not appear to be affecting my desktop installation, though I suppose it might be a problem there, too) I have subscribed the Ubuntu Server Team. -- mountall on karmic server install fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 456806] Re: mountall vomits a shell onto virtual console when you run vi
Please see bug 460153 for additional information. This causes some strange other issues that prevent me from being able to use 9.10 RC on a server. -- mountall vomits a shell onto virtual console when you run vi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 460153] [NEW] mountall on karmic server install fails
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall Newly installed and then freshly updated Karmic server install as of 24-Oct-2009 21:39 -0400. Problem is that mountall persists in running (for 1 to 2 hours) and eventually fails and displays a message on the console saying that the system is starting an emergency shell, even if the system is already running and I'm logged into a shell. Then the new shell and my shell complete for the tty input and it's not pretty. All I know, and all I can find out, at this point, is that mountall is broken in the default server install and I don't know how to fix it. I discovered this problem after updating the server and my lxc-containers then failed to start. Now, I can't get past the point of an initial setup. This bug is in the release candidate and at least in my case is inhibiting me from getting my server setup without having to do something entirely off the wall like installing Jaunty and heavily modifying it to suit my needs. ** Affects: mountall (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- mountall on karmic server install fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 451893] Re: PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log)
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 21:26 +, Daniel T Chen wrote: Firstly, are you running current Karmic? The most recent pulseaudio package Conflicts rtkit, which was spamming syslog due to a patch not being applied to the Karmic linux source package. I've updated today, I will pull updates again here in a bit. Should this issue be gone with the latest updates? --- Mike -- Blog: http://mike.trausch.us/blog/ Misc. Software: http://mike.trausch.us/software/ “The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.” —Michelangelo -- PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455779] Re: PulseAudio completely ruins all audio
ALSA works just fine by itself. ALSA has _never_ been the problem. There is no squal or high-pitched whine when running your test, and the test sounded exactly as it was supposed to. Additionally, I can play music via ogg123 under pasuspender and directly to plughw:0 and the additional squealish, high-pitched sound is not emitted. However, then I only get to use 2 of my speakers, instead of all of them (5 speakers + LFE). If the sound is played through PA, it acquires a nasty high-pitched whining. ** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- PulseAudio completely ruins all audio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455779 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455779] [NEW] PulseAudio completely ruins all audio
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pulseaudio *Everything* that is played through PulseAudio gains a high-pitched ringing tone. It sounds more or less like bad AM radio, but with bass added. I haven't a clue how to fix it so that it works properly. PulseAudio has not worked out of the box on my system for any Ubuntu release in which it has been present, and for the Karmic+1 cycle, it needs to be either *actually* fixed, or removed entirely: this is frankly getting quite ridiculous. PA is the source for a lot of bugs that can't be properly described, cannot be adequately troubleshooted, and it is apparently so difficult to fix that it hasn't properly worked since it was created. I cannot pretend to understand how to fix PA myself, and I'm a relatively technical user with a relatively basic setup, who just wants to listen to some bloody music without having to try to figure out how the audio subsystem is broken in *this* release. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: mbt3741 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/timer: mbt3741 f pulseaudio Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Live'/'SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] (rev.7, serial:0x80611102) at 0xdc00, irq 19' Mixer name : 'SigmaTel STAC9708,11' Components : 'AC97a:83847608' Controls : 224 Simple ctrls : 45 Date: Mon Oct 19 16:06:29 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: pulseaudio 1:0.9.19-0ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/zsh SourcePackage: pulseaudio Uname: Linux 2.6.31.3-bfs303 x86_64 ** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug audio -- PulseAudio completely ruins all audio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455779 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455779] Re: PulseAudio completely ruins all audio
** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33974749/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33974751/AplayDevices.txt ** Attachment added: ArecordDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33974752/ArecordDevices.txt ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33974753/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33974754/Card0.Amixer.values.txt ** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33974755/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt ** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33974756/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33974757/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33974758/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33974759/PciMultimedia.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33974760/XsessionErrors.txt -- PulseAudio completely ruins all audio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455779 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 451893] Re: PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log)
I'm not sure how to go about doing this, could you provide me with some pointers or a starting point? Deleting my log files and doing pulseaudio -k is getting somewhat old, and it makes my CPU run like crazy, thus making my fans step up to maximum and also getting to be very loud. -- PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 451893] Re: PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log)
Daniel, Yes, it happens with the Ubuntu kernel also: m...@zest:~/$ ls -l /proc/$(pgrep pulseaudio)/fd|grep timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 28 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 29 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 30 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 42 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 43 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 44 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 49 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 50 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 51 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 55 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 56 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 57 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 58 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 59 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 60 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:40 65 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:40 66 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:40 67 - /dev/snd/timer m...@zest:~/$ ps -f $(pgrep pulseaudio) UIDPID PPID C STIME TTY STAT TIME CMD mbt 3486 1 0 14:08 ?Ssl0:01 /usr/bin/pulseaudio --start m...@zest:~/$ pulseaudio --version pulseaudio 0.9.19 m...@zest:~/$ uname -a Linux zest 2.6.31-14-generic #47-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 15 03:42:30 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux m...@zest:~/$ -- PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 451893] Re: PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log)
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 22:00 +, Daniel T Chen wrote: Are you using glitch-free? I haven't the slightest clue what you're asking. I'm using PulseAudio as it comes with Ubuntu, configured for my number of speakers using the GNOME Volume control panel. --- Mike On Oct 16, 2009 5:50 PM, Michael B. Trausch m...@zest.trausch.us wrote: Daniel, Yes, it happens with the Ubuntu kernel also: m...@zest:~/$ ls -l /proc/$(pgrep pulseaudio)/fd|grep timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 28 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 29 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 30 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 42 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 43 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 44 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 49 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 50 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 51 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 55 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 56 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 57 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 58 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 59 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:39 60 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:40 65 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:40 66 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-16 17:40 67 - /dev/snd/timer m...@zest:~/$ ps -f $(pgrep pulseaudio) UID PID PPID C STIME TTY STAT TIME CMD mbt 3486 1 0 14:08 ?Ssl0:01 /usr/bin/pulseaudio --start m...@zest:~/$ pulseaudio --version pulseaudio 0.9.19 m...@zest:~/$ uname -a Linux zest 2.6.31-14-generic #47-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 15 03:42:30 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux m...@zest:~/$ -- PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log) https://bugs.launchp... -- PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451893 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “pulseaudio” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: pulseaudio First: note that this is not bug 446355, though it is similar. The message in the system log is: Oct 13 14:25:51 zest pulseaudio[3578]: alsa-util.c: Unable to set sw params: Too many open files Oct 13 14:25:51 zest pulseaudio[3578]: alsa-sink.c: Failed to set software parameters: Too many open files Infinitely, repeatedly, until the /var/log/syslog and /var/log/user.log files fill up the partition that they are on. I have had to clear my log files 3 times now in the past day because my root filesystem was full, which started breaking various things (like my postfix installation which gets my mail delivered directly to me). The log files are available on request privately, they contain information that I do not want published on the bug report, and due to their size, I cannot be sure to filter them and not accidentally remove anything relevant. There may be more in the log files than I have seen, simply because of the amount of stuff there. For anyone who requests the files, I'll email them: note that the log files are to 4 MB. However, they will expand to somewhere around 9 GB; compression on my system (4x 2.2 GHz 64-bit cores) took 300 minutes each, compressing with pbzip2. If you have a multiple-core system, decompression will go a lot more quickly if you use pbzip2 instead of bzip2 (and note also that compression took about 5 hours, I'd expect decompression to be similar). I will attached trimmed-down versions of these files as well, shortly after uploading the full log files. This bug causes denial of service of anything in /var or on /, so I am classifying this as a security bug. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: mbt 27536 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/timer: mbt 27536 f pulseaudio Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Live'/'SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] (rev.7, serial:0x80611102) at 0xdc00, irq 19' Mixer name : 'SigmaTel STAC9708,11' Components : 'AC97a:83847608' Controls : 224 Simple ctrls : 45 Date: Thu Oct 15 00:42:33 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: pulseaudio 1:0.9.19-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: pulseaudio Uname: Linux 2.6.31.3-bfs303 x86_64 -- Blog: http://mike.trausch.us/blog/ Misc. Software: http://mike.trausch.us/software/ “The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.” —Michelangelo
[Bug 451893] Re: PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log)
Hi Marc, I'm wondering why you removed the security vulnerability flag. This causes a denial of service for at least MTA software and probably any other software that relies on /var or / not being full. PulseAudio is opening /dev/snd/timer until its maximum number of open files is reached. At that point. PulseAudio logs the same two messages until /var/log's available space is full. This causes subsequent log messages to be lost, and provides opportunities for several security- related events to occur without even a remote chance of detection. Furthermore, it causes the failure of MTA software even if /var/mail is _not_ full. -- PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 451893] Re: PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log)
It would appear that the best way to trigger it is to play lots of sounds. Every time a new system event sound plays, for example, PA opens /dev/snd/timer 3 more times. I have no log messages to indicate why, nor can I otherwise explain this highly odd behavior. This means that the time to syslog beginning to fill up depends on how many events are played through the speakers. It may happen at other times, too. I just restarted PA and already have many open instances of /dev/snd/timer: m...@zest:/proc/31224/fd$ ls -l /proc/$(pgrep pulseaudio)/fd|grep timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 27 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 28 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 29 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 45 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 46 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 47 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 48 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 49 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 50 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 51 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 52 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 53 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 54 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 55 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 58 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 59 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 60 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 64 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 65 - /dev/snd/timer lr-x-- 1 mbt mbt 64 2009-10-15 22:16 66 - /dev/snd/timer m...@zest:/proc/31224/fd$ ps -f $(pgrep pulseaudio) UIDPID PPID C STIME TTY STAT TIME CMD mbt 25546 1 0 22:12 ?Ssl0:02 /usr/bin/pulseaudio --start - m...@zest:/proc/31224/fd$ pulseaudio --version pulseaudio 0.9.19 m...@zest:/proc/31224/fd$ apt-cache show pulseaudio Package: pulseaudio Priority: optional Section: sound Installed-Size: 4268 Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com Original-Maintainer: Pulseaudio maintenance team pkg-pulseaudio-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Architecture: amd64 Version: 1:0.9.19-0ubuntu2 -- PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 451893] Re: PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log)
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 03:23 +, Daniel T Chen wrote: Is this symptom reproducible in the Ubuntu Karmic kernel (2.6.31-14.47-generic)? I suppose I can find out, but if the problem is dependent on the kernel to be triggered, then this PA bug is a much larger bug than it would appear to be; PA should not have bugs able to be triggered by dropping in a newer kernel that fulfills the same interfaces. Give me some time to switch back as my system is currently working on some things and I cannot reboot right now. --- Mike -- Blog: http://mike.trausch.us/blog/ Misc. Software: http://mike.trausch.us/software/ “The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.” —Michelangelo -- PulseAudio opens too many files, locks up, and fills up root fs (/var/log) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/has a black background (multiple apps)
This is fixed in recent versions of AllTray, provided that the icons provided for the application have a transparent layer to them so that the panel color appears as intended behind the icon. However, AllTray's latest releases will not be available for Ubuntu until 0.8.0 is released (unless someone packages a dev release, such as 0.7.4dev). It is my hope to have 0.8.0 out for Karmic + 1, but this really depends on me figuring out how to implement close-to-tray, as this really seems to be the most popular feature of the software. ** Changed in: alltray Status: New = Fix Released ** Also affects: alltray (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Notification area icon wrongly rendered/has a black background (multiple apps) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438393] Re: DKMS module fails to build if CC env-var set but not OK (= sudo -H?)
The su nobody command also prohibits builds from working when using a custom kernel: m...@zest:/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/185.18.36/build$ sudo su nobody -c make KERNELRELEASE=2.6.31.3-bfs303 module KERNDIR=/lib/modules/2.6.31.3-bfs303 IGNORE_XEN_PRESENCE=1 IGNORE_CC_MISMATCH=1 SYSSRC=/lib/modules/2.6.31.3-bfs303/build If you are using a Linux 2.4 kernel, please make sure you either have configured kernel sources matching your kernel or the correct set of kernel headers installed on your system. If you are using a Linux 2.6 kernel, please make sure you have configured kernel sources matching your kernel installed on your system. If you specified a separate output directory using either the KBUILD_OUTPUT or the O KBUILD parameter, make sure to specify this directory with the SYSOUT environment variable or with the equivalent nvidia-installer command line option. Depending on where and how the kernel sources (or the kernel headers) were installed, you may need to specify their location with the SYSSRC environment variable or the equivalent nvidia-installer command line option. *** Unable to determine the target kernel version. *** make: *** [select_makefile] Error 1 m...@zest:/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/185.18.36/build$ vs: m...@zest:/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/185.18.36/build$ sudo make KERNELRELEASE=2.6.31.3-bfs303 module KERNDIR=/lib/modules/2.6.31.3-bfs303 IGNORE_XEN_PRESENCE=1 IGNORE_CC_MISMATCH=1 SYSSRC=/lib/modules/2.6.31.3-bfs303/build NVIDIA: calling KBUILD... make CC=cc KBUILD_VERBOSE=1 -C /lib/modules/2.6.31.3-bfs303/build SUBDIRS= modules make -f /home/mbt/Projects/git/linux-2.6.31.y/Makefile silentoldconfig make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic gcc -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep.c ... Using a different account for building dkms modules is understandable, but if it's going to do that, it should do sanity checking first and ensure that it can access things that way. If it cannot it should either not use su at all, or it should copy the kernel source symlink target to a location it can use, and build against that tree, then remove the tree when its done. -- DKMS module fails to build if CC env-var set but not OK (= sudo -H?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438393 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406604] Re: transmission crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
I'm going to wager a guess that this can be closed. Try as I might, I can't get it to crash again. :) -- transmission crashed with signal 5 in _XError() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406604 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441209] Re: Messages before xsplash
** Also affects: usplash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Messages before xsplash + usplash does not display at boot -- usplash does not display at boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441209 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 437835] Re: bzrtools is improperly packaged (ver is 1.18.0, pkgver is 2.0.0)
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32532636/Dependencies.txt -- bzrtools is improperly packaged (ver is 1.18.0, pkgver is 2.0.0) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 437835] [NEW] bzrtools is improperly packaged (ver is 1.18.0, pkgver is 2.0.0)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bzrtools m...@zest:~/Projects/Part-Time/Vala/trunk$ bzr cdiff -r3242.. Plugin Bzrtools is not up to date with installed Bazaar version 2.0.0. There should be a newer version of Bzrtools available, e.g. 2.0. Yet: m...@zest:~/Projects/Part-Time/Vala/trunk$ dpkg -l |grep bzrtools ii bzrtools 2.0.0-1 Collection of tools for bzr Which is incorrect because: bzrtools 1.18.0 Various useful commands for working with bzr. I do not have a bzrtools in my local plugins (~/.bazaar/plugins). ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Sep 27 16:53:11 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: bzrtools 2.0.0-1 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.36-generic SourcePackage: bzrtools Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic x86_64 ** Affects: bzrtools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- bzrtools is improperly packaged (ver is 1.18.0, pkgver is 2.0.0) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 436331] Re: bzrtools 2.0.0 in karmic thinks it is 1.18.0
While bzrtools can be installed in ~/.bazaar/plugins from its branch on Launchpad to work around this issue, it should not need to be required. An update should be pushed to the repositories ASAP. -- bzrtools 2.0.0 in karmic thinks it is 1.18.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 407831] Re: Mail key on keyboard executes wrong command
Yes, I did. When I press the button *nothing* is output to the kernel's ring buffer. I don't know why anything would be, either. -- Mail key on keyboard executes wrong command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 420225] Re: New splash looks wrong on dual-screen setup
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 16:01 +, Ruben Verweij wrote: There are two more options I think we have: only show xsplash on one screen or mirror it on both screens. Absolutely. --- Mike -- Blog: http://mike.trausch.us/blog/ Misc. Software: http://mike.trausch.us/software/ “The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.” —Michelangelo -- New splash looks wrong on dual-screen setup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429356] Re: Evolution shows new message notification with wrong count
It would seem that a recent update has fixed this bug, so I'm marking it closed. ** Changed in: evolution-indicator (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- Evolution shows new message notification with wrong count https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 66332] Re: HTML Preference does not apply itself to newsgroups
Mozilla seems not to care about this issue per the upstream bug report; nor do I any longer (I don't have the time to learn the Mozilla source code base and I've found software that works for the task). I'm going to mark this as closed in Ubuntu since it'd require upstream to do something about it in the first place; it's somewhat pointless to keep it open. ** Changed in: mozilla-thunderbird (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- HTML Preference does not apply itself to newsgroups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66332 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193487] Re: load with libc_p.a causes floating exception
This still occurs in Hardy. If the workaround listed in the Debian bug is used, instead of catching SIGFPE, it catches SIGSEGV. -- load with libc_p.a causes floating exception https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 199915] Re: error: dead-acute is undefined
This bug is gone, closing. ** Changed in: emacs-snapshot (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- error: dead-acute is undefined https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199915 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311908] Re: Add Dock to title-bar context-menu
Forgot to mark this invalid in AllTray (ubuntu) as well. Doing so now. ** Changed in: alltray (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Add Dock to title-bar context-menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420225] Re: New splash looks wrong on dual-screen setup
Took this with my cell phone to show the problem. ** Attachment added: VIDEO0003.3gp http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32029310/VIDEO0003.3gp -- New splash looks wrong on dual-screen setup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213573] Re: alltray crashed with SIGSEGV in gdk_window_get_pointer()
No new useful information has been added to this report in a long time. My original question is still outstanding: Additional information and/or a means to reproduce the bug reliably would be useful. Setting the status to incomplete pending additionally useful information (whether or not this happens in current systems would be useful, as well, as this report is from early 2008). ** Changed in: alltray (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- alltray crashed with SIGSEGV in gdk_window_get_pointer() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213573 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406582] Re: 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable
At this point, my sound is frequently totally broken. I just found PulseAudio spinning my CPU like crazy: m...@zest:~/tmp/gnumeric-1.9.9/src$ ps -eaf|grep pulseaudio mbt 4564 1 57 Sep11 ?1-13:21:20 /usr/bin/pulseaudio --start --log-target=syslog mbt 4568 4564 0 Sep11 ?00:00:00 /usr/lib/pulseaudio/pulse/gconf-helper I attempted to pulseaudio -k, which had no effect. Sending signal 15 had no effect. Sending signal 9 killed it finally, but when it came back up, it's only option for output is a null audio device. -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406582] Re: 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable
As an aside, when Pulse is spinning the CPU, any time a Flash-using site is loaded in Firefox, the whole browser dies. This makes sites like YouTube and Hulu totally unusable, and it makes it impossible to use audio notifications from applications like Pidgin. Is there a way to get rid of this from the system? It seems if I attempt to remove it, I'll also lose the ubuntu-desktop package. -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429356] [NEW] Evolution shows new message notification with wrong count
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution As of a recent Karmic update (I'm not sure which one, sorry) Evolution now shows in its %d New Messages notification the total number of new messages that have been received since Evolution was started. It should only show the number of new messages since the last time the window gained focus, or at the very least, only show the number of new messages in Inbox. Frequently, I will switch to the window, read my new messages, handle them and either delete them or save them in another folder. At that time, the new message count should be reset to 0, so that the next time new mail comes in, only the number of truly new messages are reported. The attached screenshot shows what happens after Evolution has been running and got new messages that I've already handled, but only one new message just came in. Evolution reports 3 (it has received three total since starting, five minutes ago or so, but it has only one now). ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Evolution shows new message notification with wrong count https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429356] Re: Evolution shows new message notification with wrong count
** Attachment added: evolution-msg-count-bug.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31781422/evolution-msg-count-bug.png -- Evolution shows new message notification with wrong count https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 406582] Re: 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 12:40 +, Daniel T Chen wrote: Please keep in mind that the reason for a null/dummy device is that some other process(es) is(are) holding /dev/dsp* or /dev/snd/pcm*, so try using sudo fuser -v /dev/dsp* /dev/snd/* to see what app(s) is(are) the culprit(s). I already rebooted to get sound working again, but I'm quite confident that PA will wind up shooting itself again sometime today, so I'll check that when it happens. I wouldn't think that anything would have the chance to open the sound device, though, since PA starts up immediately again after being kill -9'd. Certainly none of the applications on my desktop were actually emitting sound, of those that are capable of doing so, until I rebooted. --- Mike -- Blog: http://mike.trausch.us/blog/ Misc. Software: http://mike.trausch.us/software/ -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406582] Re: 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable
(I would just be happy to be able to use a music player—any music player—and get system sounds all at the same time without odd issues. Seems that if no sound is played for a while, volume settings revert to some strange set of defaults that introduce clipping, for example, if I get sound at all. Sometimes it skips, chunks, or sounds like static. Other times, sounds are played as out of order samples. It's just frustrating all the way around.) -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406582] Re: 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable
64-bit from upstream, version 10.0r22. I stopped using the 32-bit plugin a long time ago due to reliability issues. The 64-bit one is also unreliable (and inefficient) but it does not have all the problems that the 32-bit one did. It works half of the time instead of almost never. If my problems were only with Flash, I'd probably just avoid using it at all. As it is, I rarely use it; I have enough problems without it. -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 429356] Re: Evolution shows new message notification with wrong count
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:11 +, Alex Lourie wrote: This actually looks more like a problem with notify-OSD. Could you please check which versions of Evolution and notify-osd packages you have? While I am not initimate with notify-osd nor evolution, I was under the impression that all notification text comes from the application that uses libnotify (or the notifications protocol directly), and was not tampered with by notify-osd. How could notify-osd possibly be the component? --- Mike -- Blog: http://mike.trausch.us/blog/ Misc. Software: http://mike.trausch.us/software/ -- Evolution shows new message notification with wrong count https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429356] Re: Evolution shows new message notification with wrong count
Just to further show the effects when Evo has been running for a long time, please see the attached. When Evolution is restarted, the count resets to zero. However, while it remains running, it always increases. In this case, it's been running for roughly an hour. I maintain my mailbox as messages come in, most of the time, so my inbox stays relatively empty. At most, it has 50 messages that I haven't processed/looked at yet. Note that when I restart Evolution, I do not restart notify-osd (which, combined with my knowledge of how the notification system works and the specification underlying it, would seem to imply that notify-osd cannot possibly be a failing component here). ** Attachment added: evolution-msg-count-bug-2.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31819960/evolution-msg-count-bug-2.png -- Evolution shows new message notification with wrong count https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429356] Re: Evolution shows new message notification with wrong count
Also, if Evolution runs for a long time, the new message count gets ridiculously high, eventually becoming meaningless since I don't remember how many of those are _really_ new messages, the only thing it is meaningful for is this is the number of messages that Evolution has received since it started. If there is a notification dæmon other than notify-osd available in Karmic, I can try that, but I am 99% sure it will yield the same result. Of course, that hasn't been an issue lately, since I've had to restart nearly daily (and sometimes more frequently) between graphics chipset crashes (not the fault of software) and bug 406582. -- Evolution shows new message notification with wrong count https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 420150] Re: Login splash straddles multiple monitors
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 420225 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420225 On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 08:16 +, arky wrote: Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage. I have classified this bug as a bug in xsplash. When reporting bugs in the future please use apport, either via the appropriate application's Help - Report a Problem menu or using 'ubuntu-bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. Feel free to read the bug report and not use a canned reply when it's inappropriate to do so. I already mentioned where I found the bug, and there is no menu. As I could not determine *what* was emitting the splash screen between gdm and the desktop becoming available, I filed it as is. Surely you must realize that none of apport, ubuntu-bug, nor some non-existing menu option is the answer here, because the bloody thing doesn't *have* a menu. Thank you for finding the package that had the problem, though. I assume you did so based on some familiarity with it. If that's the case then you already knew that the canned response was worthless, though, since xsplash appears to be virtually invisible to the user. --- Mike -- Login splash straddles multiple monitors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406582] apport-collect data
Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: mbt4117 F pulseaudio Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Live'/'SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] (rev.7, serial:0x80611102) at 0xdc00, irq 19' Mixer name : 'SigmaTel STAC9708,11' Components : 'AC97a:83847608' Controls : 224 Simple ctrls : 45 CurrentDmesg: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: pulseaudio 1:0.9.16~test7-14-g7ca81-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.29-generic Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-generic x86_64 UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406582] AlsaDevices.txt
** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31456824/AlsaDevices.txt -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406582] AplayDevices.txt
** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31456868/AplayDevices.txt -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406582] BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31456923/BootDmesg.txt -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406582] ArecordDevices.txt
** Attachment added: ArecordDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31456894/ArecordDevices.txt -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406582] Card0.Amixer.values.txt
** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31456976/Card0.Amixer.values.txt -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406582] Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt
** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31456978/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406582] Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt
** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31456977/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406582] Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31456980/Dependencies.txt -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406582] PciMultimedia.txt
** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31456981/PciMultimedia.txt ** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New ** Tags added: apport-collected -- 5.1 on SB Live! 5.1 [SB0060] is very unreliable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406582 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 426086] [NEW] Installing xz-utils: You are about to do something potentially harmful.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dpkg Attempting to install xz-utils yields: m...@zest:~$ sudo apt-get install xzutils Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Couldn't find package xzutils m...@zest:~$ sudo apt-get install xz-utils Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: imagemagick-doc Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: liblzma0 The following packages will be REMOVED: lzma The following NEW packages will be installed: liblzma0 xz-utils WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed. This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing! lzma (due to dpkg) 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 1 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Need to get 245kB of archives. After this operation, 426kB of additional disk space will be used. You are about to do something potentially harmful. To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!' ?] Meaning that I'm not installing it right now. Please fix for release, or remove it from Karmic's repositories, or remove the message that says this is bad and will break all your stuff so that people don't feel like the world is ending when installing it. Thank you. I have assigned it to dpkg as it seems to be the cause of this message, per the line that says (due to dpkg). ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: lzma (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: xz-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: xz-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: lzma (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Installing xz-utils: You are about to do something potentially harmful. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 58205] Re: Should provide Right-Click-Format...
On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 09:03 +, mac_v wrote: But i would still feel more comfortable if these options are better of placed in the Properties as a separate Format tab. Having come from another system, I am sure that is what makes sense. TBH, that was something I hated. My opinion is that functionality should be there for users to get to without digging terribly far. Context menus are great places for things like that. But Properties→Format isn't really intuitive. Formatting a drive isn't a property of it. The filesystem that it currently contains is a property. What *would* be an interesting thing, though, having to do with properties as you mention it, would be to have a Change... button next to the filesystem type in the properties dialog, so that you can change the filesystem of media. (Certain filesystems would have to have the Change... button deactivated, such as currently-mounted filesystems like the root filesystem, or be able to play with the system boot-up process and be able to do things like reboot, change the root filesystem to a different one, and then start up normally.) While that would be an interesting option, that would have to be a different bug report, though. -- Should provide Right-Click-Format... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58205] Re: Should provide Right-Click-Format...
e this option (they are random-access read/write media like floppies or USB drives, so it should do it for DVD-RAM media just as it does for others). Also, the option does not show up in the places sidebar for media; only in Computer. Work has progressed, but this bug isn't fixed completely yet. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Should provide Right-Click-Format... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58205] Re: Should provide Right-Click-Format...
It presents a dialog with what appears to be a very underpopulated list of filesystem choices not based on what the system is capable of doing. The clue that it does not take immediate action but presents a dialog is that the text is format... not format (note the ellipsis). Ideally, this functionality should Just Work for all read/write media. If I put a floppy or DVD-RAM in and it is unformatted, I should additionally get a dialog asking me if I'd like to format the device. (And in the event that the device *is* formatted, but has a filesystem that isn't understood by the local system, that can be detected and a dialog can appear that says support for this filesystem isn't installed or something like that.) For read/write media, I should be able to right-click, select format, and be able to choose any filesystem that is supported for creation on my system. I should be able to format using FAT12/16/32, various versions of UDF, ext2/3/4, btrfs, and so forth. The tool should provide sanity checks as well, so that if someone is formatting a 1 GB device neither FAT12 or Minix filesystems are options, as an example. (Minix filesystems are still useful when using very old floppy disks...) It is a nice touch that it supports formatting logical volumes. Still, it needs more love. -- Should provide Right-Click-Format... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301636] Re: AllTray does not work with OpenBox
** Changed in: alltray Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- AllTray does not work with OpenBox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301636 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 420161] Re: command-not-found not working properly in karmic
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 14:49 +, Michael Vogt wrote: So it seems that the behaviour of the shell changed and it does no longer print a error message itself. I will let command-not-found print one. Was that by design, or does someone need to file a bug upstream? I'm thinking a bug... no news is good news, not the inverse... --- MIke -- command-not-found not working properly in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420161 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420150] Re: Login splash straddles multiple monitors
No, not the boot splash. The splash that appears at login. Somewhere between entering credentials at GDM and gnome-session becoming available. Where inbetween, I don't know. Retargeting back to Ubuntu generically. ** Changed in: usplash (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Package changed: usplash (Ubuntu) = ubuntu ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Invalid = New -- Login splash straddles multiple monitors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 408709] Re: New files on desktop require refresh (F5) to appear
When I monitor for changes, it seems to always work. However, it appears to randomly trigger sometimes when: * Saving downloads in Firefox to the Desktop * Saving attachments from Evolution to the Desktop I can't find additional situations that are actually triggering this behavior ever. It's indeterministic, but it's definitely not an incomplete bug report. It simply doesn't seem to follow any pattern that I can establish. The problem continues as of the latest updates. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- New files on desktop require refresh (F5) to appear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420161] Re: command-not-found not working properly in karmic
I just created a new stock user account, and the same thing happened there as well. If an SSH account would help to troubleshoot, I will happily make one provided that a public key is provided (no password). -- command-not-found not working properly in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420161 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420161] Re: command-not-found not working properly in karmic
m...@zest:~$ dpkg -l bash command-not-found Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii bash 4.0-4ubuntu1 The GNU Bourne Again SHell ii command-not-fo 0.2.37ubuntu3 Suggest installation of packages in interact It *is* a problem: m...@zest:~$ asdfasdfasdf m...@zest:~$ echo $? 127 m...@zest:~$ lsls No command 'lsls' found, did you mean: Command 'lslk' from package 'lslk' (universe) m...@zest:~$ lslslslslslslsls m...@zest:~$ echo $? 127 m...@zest:~$ At this time there are no available updates for my system (I just did an apt-get update followed by a dist-upgrade). ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- command-not-found not working properly in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420161 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 408709] Re: New files on desktop require refresh (F5) to appear
** Tags added: heisenbug -- New files on desktop require refresh (F5) to appear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420816] [NEW] (Karmic) Deletion does not advance 1 message (always) in Evolution
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution This is using a fully up-to-date Karmic as of 28-Aug-2009 18:54 -0400. When I delete a message by clicking the Delete button in the toolbar, Evolution (sometimes, but not always) skips a message. See the attached video of a recording of the window while this occurred to see the behavior directly. This bug is not always able to be reproduced. I am not certain if there is an exact set of circumstances, or whether it is random. All i know is that it is indeed a bug. ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- (Karmic) Deletion does not advance 1 message (always) in Evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420816 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420816] Re: (Karmic) Deletion does not advance 1 message (always) in Evolution
** Attachment added: out-1.ogv http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30953277/out-1.ogv -- (Karmic) Deletion does not advance 1 message (always) in Evolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420816 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420161] Re: command-not-found not working properly in karmic
Updating status to confirmed, as it has been confirmed by another user. ** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- command-not-found not working properly in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420161 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420150] [NEW] Login splash straddles multiple monitors
Public bug reported: When logging in (just freshly updated Karmic install here), I saw a nifty login splash while the desktop was getting started. Nice work. However, when displayed on a multimonitor setup (I have a 1440x900 on the left, a 1280x1024 on the right) and the splash showing the word ubuntu appears exact center between the two. It should appear exact center on the primary monitor only. This is using NVIDIA's TwinView. Apps like notify-osd and GNOME panel seem to recognize the border of each screen, though, so it should be possible for the splash to do as well. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Login splash straddles multiple monitors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420161] [NEW] command-not-found not working properly in karmic
Public bug reported: When typing an invalid command name, I expect an error, but I do not get one unless the database has alternatives: m...@zest:~$ afsdasdfasdfasdf m...@zest:~$ asdfasdfasdfasfajsgfahghags m...@zest:~$ echo $? 127 m...@zest:~$ lsls No command 'lsls' found, did you mean: Command 'lslk' from package 'lslk' (universe) m...@zest:~$ ldld No command 'ldld' found, did you mean: Command 'ldd' from package 'libc6' (main) Command 'tdld' from package 'tdl' (universe) m...@zest:~$ echo $? 127 m...@zest:~$ This is in a just-updated Karmic install. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- command-not-found not working properly in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420161 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413894] [NEW] [Karmic] Typo in vm.py
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-vm-builder in vm.py (/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/VMBuilder/vm.py) there is a typo in the Karmic package; line 303. It reads: mask = Ox Where it should read: mask = 0x (in the first, it is a capital letter O, the latter, it is a zero). ** Affects: ubuntu-vm-builder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Karmic] Typo in vm.py https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413894 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
