[Bug 653245] Re: Docky theme is absent!
Why is the docky theme in gnome do missing? I find the docky standalone inadequate. -- Docky theme is absent! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 286050] Re: Cannot change volume with keyboard volume dial while in drop down menu.
I confirm this bug on Lucid running on Thinkpad T61. This bug did exist on Karmic also. Let me know if you need more information. I'm not an expert with the command line fyi. Cheers, -- Cannot change volume with keyboard volume dial while in drop down menu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286050 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 150112] Re: GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionality
@antistress: Please check if your new bug report is a dupe of the ones already in remote bug watch above. -- GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionality https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 150112] Re: GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionality
** Summary changed: - GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionnality + GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionality -- GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionality https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 150112] Re: GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionnality
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #149572 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149572 ** Changed in: nautilus Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: nautilus Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: nautilus Remote watch: None = GNOME Bug Tracker #149572 ** Tags added: trash ** Bug watch removed: GNOME Bug Tracker #408997 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408997 -- GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionnality https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date
Approx. when can we hope to find this patched version in the repos? And for which Ubuntu versions? Thanks, -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date
Thanks for the info. I'm on Karmic and so is there any way I can find any non-canonical repo with the patched version? -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date
I had tried that before and ran is problems with dependencies and stuff, and I know to use the CLI for basic stuffs only. I guess I'll have to wait till someone packages it into some repo. Its been a long time I've been waiting for this patch. Thanks again, -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 426417] Re: broken menus at Ubuntu Linux 9.04/9.10 with intel-2.8.1/2.9
Thanks Davidiam and Bogdan, Disabling texture tiling using driconf fixed the problem on my Thinkpad T61 with intel graphics. Thanks, -- broken menus at Ubuntu Linux 9.04/9.10 with intel-2.8.1/2.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426417 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 377404] Re: Ubuntu crash after rdesktop start
I too have the same problem while accessing WinXP via any desktop client that uses RDP. I am running karmic on a Thinkpad T61. I can offer more details if sometime tells me what details are needed. Cheers, ** Also affects: tsclient (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Ubuntu crash after rdesktop start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 377404] Re: Ubuntu crash after rdesktop start
Is there no workaround to this problem? -- Ubuntu crash after rdesktop start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date
@ Marcus: Is there a repository that you are aware of that hosts the patched nautilus? I checked yours, but wasnt sure if it was the one I was looking for. Thanks for all your efforts! -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444171] Re: Firefox plugin shows incorrect icon
I confirm this bug on Karmic. I never had this issue on jaunty. -- Firefox plugin shows incorrect icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444171 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: FFe: Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers
Why is the bugfix by Tom Jaeger not being rolled out to the main ppa? Every time some routine update breaks my patched system, I have to wait for Tom to compile and post updates patches on his ppa. Thanks, -- FFe: Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date
I could not go beyond # apt-get build-dep nautilus due to error E: Build-dependencies for nautilus could not be satisfied. I tried fixing it using some development libraries like gtk etc., but got drawn deeper into dependency hell. -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date
@ Marcus: No, I'm running Jaunty. I realise it was bcos I have a modded libcairo that I need to fix a firefox bug. But even after I fixed that issue, I had problems with the patch not being applied despite using various prefixes from 05-20 for the patch file. -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date
:D Sorry I didnt fully get you. The only way I can afford is by adding/enabling a repository in synaptic and letting the system take care of the conflicts/dependencies. Is there anyway I can do that in this situation? I cannot risk messing too much with my system as this is the only one I have and I have to use it for work. Apologies and Thanks, -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date
Thanks for the effort. Let us know if there is anything we can do. FYI...I'm a non-programmer, but can help with some testing if needed. Cheers, -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222068] Re: nautilus trash does not show file origin or deletion date
The duplicate of tag was removed since none of the other related bugs (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/150112, https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/301552 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/228369) mention displaying the file origin. Either rephrase this or the other bugs to include both deletion date and file origin or keep them as separate bugs. Cheers! ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 150112 GNOME needs a Trash Autopurge functionnality -- nautilus trash does not show file origin or deletion date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222068 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222068] Re: nautilus trash does not show file origin or deletion date
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Incomplete -- nautilus trash does not show file origin or deletion date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222068 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228369] Re: add an option to autodelete items from trash:/ after a specified span of time
Isnt this bug a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/150112 ? -- add an option to autodelete items from trash:/ after a specified span of time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date
Thanks for the prompt response Pedro. It would help if you clarify my next logical question: How is one supposed to use the Trash feature in ubuntu? Is it currently meant only for the purpose of immediate (NOT short/long term) retrieval of deleted files? Because I cannot currently empty the trash without loosing both recent and really old files, when I can only afford to delete the really old files. But I may not be using the Trash feature in the way it is intended and would really like someone to tell me how to use it the way it exists currently. Cheers! -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date
Some updates here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1178917 -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date
And some more here: http://code.google.com/p/trash-cli/ -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date
A similar bug has been fixed in KDE/Kubuntu and is discussed here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/228369 Using all the links to code above and the Kubuntu bugfix, it doesnt seem like fixing this bug in Ubuntu/Nautilus should take too long for a programmer (unfortunately I'm not, so maybe I'm wrong). This bug is really a nuisance for people who need to empty trash often without having to delete the recently trashed files. Is this still a non-trivial fix? Is it still not qualified to be a papercut? -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256876] Re: MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office
There doesnt seem to be anything going on in the upstream bug report. Is this going to ever get fixed? As has been mentioned before, many users, esp. in the academic, research, university environment do use a lot of equations and unless this bug is fixed, a valuable user base will be lost or never captured. -- MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200127] Re: update-manager window behavior is annoying
Rephrased bug title to be more representative of the actual bug. ** Summary changed: - ubuntu incorrectly believes I enjoy staring at progress bars + update-manager window behavior is annoying -- update-manager window behavior is annoying https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 372132] Re: Create Document Templates difficult to use
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Status: New = Confirmed -- Create Document Templates difficult to use https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200127] Re: ubuntu incorrectly believes I enjoy staring at progress bars
Based on some of the comments, looks like some people might be quite interested in what the updater is doing, especially people who'd like to disconnect the network as soon as the downloads are done, or if you'd like to restart any of the programs. I propose this: Add check box(es) in the update manager window that allow user to (1) specify whether the update manager minimizes to notif area and does its thing quitely and (2) also specify whether it should automatically close when all updates are successfully installed. The update manager already uses the notif area to inform the user about updates so I'm hoping that making the above changes should only involve minimal coding. -- ubuntu incorrectly believes I enjoy staring at progress bars https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 372132] Re: Create Document Templates difficult to use
** Summary changed: - Create Document Templates + Create Document Templates difficult to use -- Create Document Templates difficult to use https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200127] Re: ubuntu incorrectly believes I enjoy staring at progress bars
Dave, I agree with Steve and it is not exactly a duplicate. Here's why: Once the update manager has been instructed to install updates, it almost all the time does its job without requiring the users inputs at all. So I dont see any point in having a separate window dedicated to update manager which keeps blinking when it switches from downloading to installing files. An unobtrusive notification icon should work well. Also, once it is done successfully installing all updates, the only available buttons for a user to push are check for updates and close. If the system has just finished updates, why would a user want to immediately check for more updates? If so, why does it sit around waiting for me to just click the close button (there is nothing else a user can do with that window)? What I'm suggesting is once the user has clicked the install updates button, minimize update managers to the notif area and if everything goes well, display a notif bubble for a coupla seconds. Bother the user only if something has not gone right with the updates. -- ubuntu incorrectly believes I enjoy staring at progress bars https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 372132] Re: Create Document Templates
The justification for marking this bug as invalid in Nautilus is (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/372132/comments/3): the rational to have no template by default is that the choice of what to put there is an user one and upstream is against giving a way for applications to put tons of useless items in there for most users. If that is the rationale, how does one justify the confusion or frustration it creates to users as given in the bug description? Using the right-click menu if one creates a new document, renames it with the extension of one's choice, and opens it with the appropriate software, just does not work. Nor is it clear as to how one is supposed to create/add new templates. If the designers are against putting useless templates in there, at least provide a straightforward means to add new templates. I have been going thru some of the bugs (and filing some myself) and have seen many bugs rejected as not paper cut worthy. If this does not meet ALL the requirements of being a paper cut, I dont know what does. Please clarify which specific criteria this bug fails to not qualify as a paper cut. ** Summary changed: - Create Document Templates + Create Document Templates -- Create Document Templates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 372132] Re: Create Document Templates
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Status: Invalid = New -- Create Document Templates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 274405] Re: network manager slow to reconnect after suspend/resume
** Tags added: wireless ** Tags added: suspend -- network manager slow to reconnect after suspend/resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274405 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 274405] Re: network manager slow to reconnect after suspend/resume
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New -- network manager slow to reconnect after suspend/resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274405 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date
Related (not duplicates) bugs are https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150112 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228369 These are functionality that is necessary when a user runs low on diskspace. A user cannot decide which files are to be emptied from the trash (automatically or manually) unless there is a way to sort the files by the deletion dates. ** Also affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301552] Re: in trash: show delete-date
I cannot comment on whether this is trivially fixable or not, but as an end user I find the Trash feature practically useless if I cannot clean out large quantities of trash (automatically or manually) periodically. Knowing the delete date is vital to achieving this (and is not a feature request, but a vital flaw in functionality), in my opinion. But then its just my opinion. Thanks for the quick response, dave. Cheers. -- in trash: show delete-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 274405] Re: network manager slow to reconnect after suspend/resume
@ hackel: 30-60 seconds is more like an average time. I have had instances when I had to wait a few minutes (despite using iwlist scan immediately on resuming from suspend or restarting network manager and networking daemons). @ Mat: I agree this may not be a design issue, but as Hackel pointed out, it is a usability issue and meets all other conditions of 100 paper cuts. -- network manager slow to reconnect after suspend/resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274405 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 386150] Re: Nautilus file browser toolbar is complicated, redundant, and ugly
The tabbing functionality in Nautilus is something that I often use. But I always have to use Ctrl-T to open a new tab or click thru the menus to open a new tab. How about adding a new new tab button to the Nautilus toolbar which would open a new tabbed Nautilus window? -- Nautilus file browser toolbar is complicated, redundant, and ugly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 372132] Re: Create Document Templates
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Create Document Templates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256876] Re: MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office
@Geoff: Thanks for the effort, but your tips do not fix the problem for me. All the documents that earlier had the problem still look the same in OO.o, including the sample file attached to this bug report (http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22414413/minimal_example.ppt). Does the above example attachement open correctly for you? -- MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256876] Re: MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office
@ Claus: The bug occurs when a formula created in MSword using the mathtype plugin is opened in OOffice. The bug is not related to equations created within OOffice. This bug affects the interoperability between OOffice and MSword/Mathtype. -- MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers
Hey Tom, this bug that I had fixed using the patches in your PPA has resurfaced again after the ubuntu firefox update that happened today. It looks like the xulrunner package has been updated and I'm not able to force it to your version without breaking dependencies. The cairo and pixman files are still your versions. Any suggestions? -- Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers
I just wanted to point out that the same (page-zoom) issue that exists in Opera is still the same even though it has been fixed in Firefox. I was initially under the impression that the page-zoom-image-distortion issue in both browsers was related, simply bcos the poorly zoomed images in both browsers displayed similar symptoms/artifacts. So I guess the two issues are unrelated, and maybe we should separate them as two different bugs instead of one. -- Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
Thanks Michael. Hi Tom, I'm able to install the libpixman and xulrunner files in your repo without issues and that fixes the problem. I'm unable to install the cairo/udeb packages in the repo due to unresolved dependencies. Does that mean im taking a performance hit? Thanks, -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
Hey Tom, Is it ok to request people on UbuntuForums to help with running the test that you need? Should I go ahead and make a post asking for volunteers using nvidia/ati to run the reflect-test program? Is there any possibility of any issues with their systems while running the test? Cheers! -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
Trying to install the xulrunner packages and/or the cairo package from your ppa leads to unresolved dependencies on Intrepid. Cheers! -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
Tom, My graphics card specifics (on Intrepid) are: 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 0c) Regarding installing xulrunner and cairo using jaunty dependencies, that sounds like dependency hell waiting to happen. I guess I'll wait till the official release. Cheers, -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
Here are the results of the test on another separate machine: Ubuntu version: 8.04 LTS (Hardy Heron) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) Testing repeat mode none: PASS Testing repeat mode normal: PASS Testing repeat mode pad: PASS Testing repeat mode reflect: *** FAIL *** 60 pixels differ from expected result. Expected output written to repeat-test-reflect-expected.png Actual output written to repeat-test-reflect-out.png Hope this helps, Cheers! -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
Thanks Tom, for all your effort in pushing this. I did run the test (without any of the patches you listed in earlier posts) and my output is: Testing repeat mode none: PASS Testing repeat mode normal: PASS Testing repeat mode pad: PASS Testing repeat mode reflect: *** FAIL *** 60 pixels differ from expected result. Expected output written to repeat-test-reflect-expected.png Actual output written to repeat-test-reflect-out.png I have an Intel integrated graphics card. I dont remember the command I could use to get more details about the card, else would have given more specifics. Should I go ahead and install the patched xulrunner and rerun the tests? Cheers! -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
Tom, regarding the patch, you mentioned that applying it be slower and performance could take a hit. I scale up almost all the webpages I browse, so does that mean it would add up to a notable performance hit? -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
Why is the importance of this bug set to 'wishlist'? Isnt this something that is not working the way it is intended to, rather than a feature request?Having the page zoom functionality would be a wishlist, but asking for a broken page zoom functionality to be fixed would be a proper bug (Low priority, maybe). Is a wishlist simply because, strictly speaking, the bug affects a feature that one can live without? I (and many others using high ppi displays) would like to disagree bcos it can sometimes be really hard to read webpages (designed for standard 96ppi displays) without zooming. And with more people having high ppi displays nowadays, it is not a wishlist anymore, but an accessibility issue. But one rather curious point that I would like to bring to the attention of whoever is working on the bug is my comment above: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/217908/comments/26 It gives me an impression that the bug fix might be easier to fix that I imagine it to be. But I'm no developer and I could not know for sure. -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295536] Re: cups-pdf fails bad status reported and no pdf created
I think I have the same issue. I cannot add a PDF printer in the printer configuration tool. But the 'print to file' option works with pdf and ps formats. Starting cups thru terminal results in error message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/cups start * Starting Common Unix Printing System: cupsd cupsd: Child exited on signal 15! [fail] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ -- cups-pdf fails bad status reported and no pdf created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
Here's something that I find truly weird: When I zoom any page a whole bunch of times, the image files are all jagged and messy, but if I click-n-drag any such badly zoomed image, the image that gets dragged with the mouse is zoomed perfectly, and to the same scale as the original! -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256876] Re: MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office
** Bug watch added: OpenOffice.org Issue Tracker #92203 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92203 ** Also affects: openoffice via http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92203 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256876] Re: MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office
** Description changed: OpenOffice Writer does not show and convert MathType equations correctly. When the .doc file containing MathType 5 formulas is opened in OO, all symbols of integrals, derivatives, sums etc. are missed or substituted by funny characters. As a result the formulas are messed up completely. The formulas are not converted to OO Math, but shown as figures (not editable) even if convert math from/to MathType option is selected. - This bug seems to be ubuntu-specific. Original bug sent to OO team was - not reproduced (http://www.mail- - archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg396313.html). However, it was - confirmed in Ubuntu 8.04 and 8.10alpha, but not in Mandriva Spring - (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=872833). + This bug seems to be ubuntu-specific. Original bug sent to OO team was not reproduced (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg396313.html). However, it was confirmed in Ubuntu 8.04 and 8.10alpha, but not in Mandriva Spring (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=872833). The bug exists even when + the deb package provided on the OO.o website is used instead of the ubuntu repos version. This bug is really critical for people, who exchange documents with formulas with collaborators using MSWord+MathType. The test file can be found in original bug report (http://www.mail- archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg396313.html). ** Description changed: OpenOffice Writer does not show and convert MathType equations correctly. When the .doc file containing MathType 5 formulas is opened in OO, all symbols of integrals, derivatives, sums etc. are missed or substituted by funny characters. As a result the formulas are messed up completely. The formulas are not converted to OO Math, but shown as figures (not editable) even if convert math from/to MathType option is selected. - This bug seems to be ubuntu-specific. Original bug sent to OO team was not reproduced (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg396313.html). However, it was confirmed in Ubuntu 8.04 and 8.10alpha, but not in Mandriva Spring (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=872833). The bug exists even when - the deb package provided on the OO.o website is used instead of the ubuntu repos version. + This bug seems to be ubuntu-specific. Original bug sent to OO team was not reproduced (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg396313.html). However, it was confirmed in Ubuntu 8.04 and 8.10alpha, but not in Mandriva Spring (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=872833). + The bug exists even when the deb package provided on the OO.o website is used instead of the ubuntu repos version. This bug is really critical for people, who exchange documents with formulas with collaborators using MSWord+MathType. The test file can be found in original bug report (http://www.mail- archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg396313.html). -- MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256876] Re: MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office
@Chris: Why was the status changed to new? Hasnt the bug been confirmed by multiple sources above (including me)? -- MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256876] Re: MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office
I have the same issue on my system. I do not know what additional information I need supply to zoom in on the specific bug. -- MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256876] Re: MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office
@Chris: Thanks, but openoffice.org-math was installed along with the entire open-office suite. So no, openoffice math does not solve the problem. -- MathType formulas messed up and not converted in Open Office https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
@Bryce, thank you so much for your time. I trying for so long to get some response on this. I a relative noob and am not into coding, so I can't compare actual codes and the like. My comments are based on what I have read on forums and mailing lists. Based on that and my personal experience, here are the answers to your queries: * On the comment here https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422179#c9 says Mozilla doesn't scale the images at all -- we hand off the image and a transform to RENDER, which needs to do the scaling. The issue is that the version of pixman that's currently shipped with all X servers doesn't implement EXTEND_PAD, which we need to get correct behaviour at image edges. * And here http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/03/18/a-little-more-cairo-just-for-you/ which says Linux users will have to wait a little longer to get higher quality image scaling; as we now rely on the X server to do image compositing through the Render extension, we'll have to wait until the pixman patches are integrated into the X server. I'm hoping that will happen in time for the next X.org release. * And the release of the library pixman( http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-announce/2008-March/000529.html ) makes reference to modifications in the EXTEND_PAD. * Related comparison of graphics renderings on winXP and ubuntu hardy are here: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2162/2481984708_dedc30e9df_o.png * This poll on Ubuntu forums indicates that 45 of 56 voters had this issue on intrepid as of today http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=867161 These are the pieces that I used to guess that the bug might be fixed upstream. Thats the best I could do. I'm aware that latest Intrepid and Fedora10 beta use the latest xorg packages but dont seem to have this bug fixed. Based on the above info, I also assumed that it had nothing to do with the graphics card. My Xorg log is attached. ** Attachment added: Xorg log file. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18443688/Xorg.0.log -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
** Changed in: libpixman Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: xorg-server Status: New = Confirmed -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
This bug has been fixed in the latest xorg packages, but has yet to be patched in Intrepid. Will this bugfix ever get integrated into Intrepid? Can someone please tell me why it is this hard to implement this patch for a graphics issue that affects Firefox and Opera on Linux alone? This issue is practically ruining my browsing experience. -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
The ubuntu forums post on this thread (http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=867161 ) claims that the bug still exists on Intrepid. -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
** Changed in: libpixman Status: Invalid = New -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
** Also affects: xorg-server Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: xorg-server Status: New = Confirmed -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
** Also affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: libpixman Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Also affects: pixman (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: pixman (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: xorg-server Status: Confirmed = New -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox are extremely pixeled when zoomed
** Tags added: firefox3 -- Images in Firefox are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox are extremely pixeled when zoomed
The exact same issue exists while using page zoom/image scaling in Opera web browser. ** Also affects: opera-browser Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Images in Firefox are extremely pixeled when zoomed + Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed ** Tags added: opera -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
Based on the comment here https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422179#c9 and here http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/03/18/a-little-more-cairo-just-for-you/ and the release of the library pixman( http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-announce/2008-March/000529.html ), seems like the issue might be resolved by using that version of pixman at freedesktop. Could this be released as a patch for hardy? Or would it involve complicated dependency issues and stuff? If not, is there any way I could fix this on my system? If so, how? Thanks, ** Also affects: libpixman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed
** Changed in: libpixman Status: New = Fix Committed ** Changed in: libpixman Status: Fix Committed = Confirmed -- Images in Firefox and Opera are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox are extremely pixeled when zoomed
@ubuntu demon: The issue is discussed here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422179 and not the bug that you mentioned. vlad says about the bug (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422179#c9) that Mozilla doesn't scale the images at all -- we hand off the image and a transform to RENDER, which needs to do the scaling. The issue is that the version of pixman that's currently shipped with all X servers doesn't implement EXTEND_PAD, which we need to get correct behaviour at image edges. I'm a noob, and this bug is really bothering me. I have my account of the problems on ubuntuforums: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=841739 Please help. -- Images in Firefox are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217908] Re: Images in Firefox are extremely pixeled when zoomed
** Changed in: firefox Bugwatch: Mozilla Bugzilla #411831 = Mozilla Bugzilla #422179 Status: Invalid = Unknown -- Images in Firefox are extremely pixeled when zoomed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
