[Bug 665865] [NEW] Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox Ubuntu Release: 10.10 Rhythmbox version: 0.13.1-0ubuntu5 Hello, I have various video files in my Music folder, for instance music videos or live footage ripped from some album's bonus CD or DVD or downloaded form the Internet. To my surprise, this version of Rhythmbox imports some of them in the music library, but not all of them. In the attached screenshot you can see five FLV videos downloaded from the Internet and listed by Rhythmbox in the music library (with Unknown as Genre / Artist / Album, quite understandably). All other videos in my Music folder are not recognized. At first I suspected Rhythmbox importing videos or not was a matter of container format and/or audio-video codecs, but I have examples of files in the same format and codecs, one of them being imported but the other not, so I have no idea of a possible interpretation. Then, to my utmost surprise, Rhythmbox plays these videos! I found out that when the Visualization plug-in is enabled, Rhythmbox plays the video flawlessly in an external window (see attached screenshot) (restarting Rhythmbox seems necessary, though), and when this plug-in is disabled, Rhythmbox plays only the audio, with the position slider not working as it should, i.e. it runs quickly to the right and then stops at the end while the remaining audio is read (always at normal speed). During video playback, Rhythmbox controls work as expected (pause, previous/next, moving the slider). If the Visualization button is clicked, the external window is docked into Rhythmbox (like a visualization). If it is clicked again, the external window does not pop out, the visualization disappears but the audio keeps playing. One more quirk: if I close the video window during playback, the video that was played disappears from the music library to go in the Missing Files section, with the error Output window was closed (see attached screenshot). The next time I start Rhythmbox, these errors are gone and the videos are back in the music library. So... From perusing the bug archives, I understand that Rhythmbox, although not a video player or video library manager, has some video podcast abilities through the Visualization plug-in, so perhaps the five video files it lists are recognized as downloaded video podcasts (they are not, as far as I know)? I appreciate that Rhythmbox lists and plays them, but would be even more delighted if it listed and played all the video files in my Music folder, not just these arbitrary five. To sum it up: 1. What I expected to happen: as far as I know, Rhythmbox is not supposed to list video files in the music library, let alone play them. 2. What happened instead: Rhythmbox imported and played videos, but only some of them, and with a few quirks. Shall I run Apport? It leaves me with a choice of ill-suited options: The rhythmbox interface is not working correctly No sound is being played Some audio files are not being played correctly The Ubuntu One Music Store is not working correctly Shall I report this bug upstream? (In Gnome Bugzilla, in'nit?) Shall I attach an example of video that gets recognized and an example of video that does not? ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665865] Re: Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them
** Attachment added: Rhythmbox imports videos https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665865/+attachment/1709198/+files/Rhythmbox%20imports%20videos.png -- Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665865] Re: Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them
** Attachment added: Rhythmbox plays videos https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/665865/+attachment/1709199/+files/Rhythmbox%20plays%20videos.png -- Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665865] Re: Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them
** Attachment added: Error after closing video window https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/665865/+attachment/1709200/+files/Error%20after%20closing%20video%20window.png -- Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548846] Re: in netbook remix, emacs23 but not emacs22 sizes wrongly in initial full-screen opening
Emacs23.2 from ppa:ubuntu-elisp has a much smaller window than Emacs23.1 shipped with Ubuntu 10.10. I guess this is because of a much smaller font size. Upgrading to this version solved my problem of having the mode line off the bottom of my screen (1440x900), a problem reported by Kalman in bug #622246, a duplicate of this bug (although I am not sure it should really be marked as a duplicate). I am not using Ubuntu Network Edition though, but it may be worth a try for people using it too. -- in netbook remix, emacs23 but not emacs22 sizes wrongly in initial full-screen opening https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548846 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665865] Re: Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: Binary package hint: rhythmbox Ubuntu Release: 10.10 Rhythmbox version: 0.13.1-0ubuntu5 Hello, I have various video files in my Music folder, for instance music videos or live footage ripped from some album's bonus CD or DVD or downloaded form the Internet. To my surprise, this version of Rhythmbox imports some of them in the music library, but not all of them. In the attached screenshot you can see five FLV videos downloaded from the Internet and listed by Rhythmbox in the music library (with Unknown as Genre / Artist / Album, quite understandably). All other videos in my Music folder are not recognized. At first I suspected Rhythmbox importing videos or not was a matter of container format and/or audio-video codecs, but I have examples of files in the same format and codecs, one of them being imported but the other not, so I have no idea of a possible interpretation. Then, to my utmost surprise, Rhythmbox plays these videos! I found out that when the Visualization plug-in is enabled, Rhythmbox plays the video flawlessly in an external window (see attached screenshot) (restarting Rhythmbox seems necessary, though), and when this plug-in is disabled, Rhythmbox plays only the audio, with the position slider not working as it should, i.e. it runs quickly to the right and then stops at the end while the remaining audio is read (always at normal speed). During video playback, Rhythmbox controls work as expected (pause, previous/next, moving the slider). If the Visualization button is clicked, the external window is docked into Rhythmbox (like a visualization). If it is clicked again, the external window does not pop out, the visualization disappears but the audio keeps playing. One more quirk: if I close the video window during playback, the video that was played disappears from the music library to go in the Missing Files section, with the error Output window was closed (see attached screenshot). The next time I start Rhythmbox, these errors are gone and the videos are back in the music library. So... From perusing the bug archives, I understand that Rhythmbox, although not a video player or video library manager, has some video podcast abilities through the Visualization plug-in, so perhaps the five video files it lists are recognized as downloaded video podcasts (they are not, as far as I know)? I appreciate that Rhythmbox lists and plays them, but would be even more delighted if it listed and played all the video files in my Music folder, not just these arbitrary five. To sum it up: 1. What I expected to happen: as far as I know, Rhythmbox is not supposed to list video files in the music library, let alone play them. 2. What happened instead: Rhythmbox imported and played videos, but only some of them, and with a few quirks. Shall I run Apport? It leaves me with a choice of ill-suited options: The rhythmbox interface is not working correctly No sound is being played Some audio files are not being played correctly The Ubuntu One Music Store is not working correctly Shall I report this bug upstream? (In Gnome Bugzilla, in'nit?) - Shall I attach an example of video that gets recognized and an example - of video that does not? + Shall I attach an example of video that gets recognized and an example of video that does not? + --- + Architecture: amd64 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007) + NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl + Package: rhythmbox 0.13.1-0ubuntu5 + PackageArchitecture: amd64 + ProcEnviron: + LANGUAGE=fr_FR:fr:en_US:en_GB:en + LANG=fr_FR.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/bash + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.35-generic 2.6.35.4 + Tags: maverick + Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64 + UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/665865/+attachment/1710276/+files/Dependencies.txt -- Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665865] GConfNonDefault.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/665865/+attachment/1710277/+files/GConfNonDefault.txt -- Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665865] GstreamerVersions.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: GstreamerVersions.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/665865/+attachment/1710278/+files/GstreamerVersions.txt -- Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665865] LogAlsaMixer.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: LogAlsaMixer.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/665865/+attachment/1710279/+files/LogAlsaMixer.txt -- Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665865] XorgLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/665865/+attachment/1710280/+files/XorgLog.txt -- Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665865] Re: Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them
Hi, thank you for your answer Darran. I checked in Gnome Bugzilla before submitting this bug report, and did not find anything related, so I'm opening a new one right now. -- Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665865] Re: Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them
Done. The bug number in Gnome Bugzilla is 633094, see: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633094. I have added a bugwatch. ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #633094 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633094 ** Also affects: rhythmbox via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633094 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Rhythmbox imports (some) videos and plays them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081123] Re: New Tab only displays the thumbnail of the first visited website of the current session despite all thumbnails being correctly generated
This bug is still present in Firefox 17.0.1. I have no idea why it has been marked Invalid in Firefox's Bugzilla. I have also no idea what I could do to help troubleshoot it. Could the other person affected by this bug also report it upstream in Firefox's Bugzilla bug report (link above)? Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081123 Title: New Tab only displays the thumbnail of the first visited website of the current session despite all thumbnails being correctly generated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1081123/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081123]
This bug is still present in Firefox 17.0.1 [Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0]. I have no idea why it has been marked Invalid. Curtis, could you please elaborate? What can I do to help troubleshoot this problem? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081123 Title: New Tab only displays the thumbnail of the first visited website of the current session despite all thumbnails being correctly generated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1081123/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081123] Re: New Tab only displays the thumbnail of the first visited website of the current session despite all thumbnails being correctly generated
Bug reported upstream in case someone wants to investigate. ** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #814996 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=814996 ** Also affects: firefox via https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=814996 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081123 Title: New Tab only displays the thumbnail of the first visited website of the current session despite all thumbnails being correctly generated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1081123/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1013386] Re: unity 2d dash doesn't open office files
This bug might be a duplicate of bug #1002710, if Uri can confirm that the files he can't open from the dash in Unity 2D are in a folder whose name contains Greek or accentuated characters (or perhaps, more generally, non-Latin characters). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013386 Title: unity 2d dash doesn't open office files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-2d/+bug/1013386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 992717] Re: Opening files from the Dash randomly doesn't work
This bug might be a duplicate of bug #1002710, if Péter can confirm that the files he can't open from the dash in Unity 2D are in a folder whose name contains Greek or accentuated characters (or perhaps, more generally, non-Latin characters). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992717 Title: Opening files from the Dash randomly doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-2d/+bug/992717/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1002710] Re: Dash will not open files under Greek folders
This bug might have other duplicates than bug #1003820: bugs #1013386 and #992717. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002710 Title: Dash will not open files under Greek folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/1002710/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1002710] Re: Dash will not open files under Greek folders
Is there any chance for this bug to be fixed in Ubuntu 12.04? The fix has been committed to Unity 2D 5.14 if I understand correctly, but Ubuntu 12.04 uses Unity 2D 5.12, and no new version of Unity 2D has been released since 5.12 in April. Sorry if it's a newb question but it's very unclear to me whether 5.14 will be available for Ubuntu 12.04, what with Unity 2D being discontinued in Ubuntu 12.10 and whatnot. Thanks for any clarification. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002710 Title: Dash will not open files under Greek folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/1002710/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1080811] Re: Unity 2D doesn't honor X-GNOME-FullName as launcher hover text
** Also affects: unity-2d (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080811 Title: Unity 2D doesn't honor X-GNOME-FullName as launcher hover text To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/1080811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081123] [NEW] New Tab only displays the thumbnail of the first visited website of the current session despite all thumbnails being correctly generated
Public bug reported: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0 Firefox package version: 16.0.2+build1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 Hi, I'm using Firefox 16.0.2 on an up-to-date Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS, and my settings are to clear history/cache when Firefox closes. In these conditions, about:newtab is supposed to display thumbnails of the most visited websites of the current session (according to fixed bugs 744388 and 736724 in Mozilla Bugzilla). The behavior I observe is that about:newtab only displays the thumbnail of the first visited website of the current session, in top-left position. The eight other thumbnails remain blank (no text, no image). Yet thumbnails are correctly generated and saved in the thumbnails directory in my profile directory. In the attached picture, I've opened www.omgubuntu.co.uk, www.nytimes.com, boards.4chan.org/b, www.perdu.com, about:newtab in five different tabs, in that order, in a new session, with all addons/plugins/language packs deactivated. I've waited for each webpage to load completely before opening the next one. None of these websites uses HTTPS or Cache-Control: no-store/no-cache. Only the first visited website gets a thumbnail in about:newtab, despite thumbnails for all websites appearing in the thumbnails directory. The same behavior occurs when starting Firefox in Safe Mode. Can anybody reproduce this behavior? What additional info could I provide for it to be triaged and fixed? Should I report it upstream? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744388 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736724 ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: Screenshot of the reported behavior https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081123/+attachment/3439477/+files/bug%20report.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081123 Title: New Tab only displays the thumbnail of the first visited website of the current session despite all thumbnails being correctly generated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1081123/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 992717] Re: Opening files from the Dash randomly doesn't work
Hi Péter, there is no mention of a warning/error in the bug I linked to (bug #1002710) or in its duplicates (bug #1003820 and bug #1013386). Opening files from the Dash fails silently, so your bug might be the same. If you sometimes get a warning/error when you try to open files from the Dash, that might indicate another bug, or that the file you're trying to open has been moved/renamed/deleted. You can try to reproduce your bug in Unity 2D by creating test/somefile1.txt and tést/somefile2.txt and try to open them from the Dash. You won't be able to use Unity 2D anymore if you've upgraded to Ubuntu 12.10 though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992717 Title: Opening files from the Dash randomly doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-2d/+bug/992717/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1002710] Re: Dash will not open files under Greek folders
Adding to Frédéric's comment #2 and Pierre's comment #5, I can confirm that this bug happens wherever the accentuated character occurs in the file's full path, i.e.: /home/nael/testdir/testsubdir/téstfile.txt /home/nael/testdir/téstsubdir/testfile.txt /home/nael/téstdir/testsubdir/testfile.txt cannot be opened from the Dash in Unity 2D 5.12. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002710 Title: Dash will not open files under Greek folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/1002710/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 992717] Re: Opening files from the Dash randomly doesn't work
Does ~ stands for peter or péter? If it stands for peter, then the bug you are reporting is indeed the same as bug #1002710, bug #1003820, bug #1013386: the Dash in Unity 2D fails silently to open files with an accentuated character in its name or path. As for the warning/error you sometimes get, that would be a completely different bug, imho. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992717 Title: Opening files from the Dash randomly doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-2d/+bug/992717/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1002710] Re: Dash will not open files under Greek folders
I can also confirm that this bug affects files who have Greek or Russian characters (accentuated or not) in their name or path. And I'm modifying the bug name to better describe this. ** Tags removed: lens ** Tags added: accents dash russian ** Summary changed: - Dash will not open files under Greek folders + Dash will not open files with accentuated, Greek or Russian characters in their name or path -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002710 Title: Dash will not open files with accentuated, Greek or Russian characters in their name or path To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/1002710/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081123] Re: New Tab only displays the thumbnail of the first visited website of the current session despite all thumbnails being correctly generated
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 Got Firefox 17 in the updates today. This bug is present. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081123 Title: New Tab only displays the thumbnail of the first visited website of the current session despite all thumbnails being correctly generated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1081123/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 992717] Re: Opening files from the Dash randomly doesn't work
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1002710 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002710 Sorry, I misread your comment #6. Indeed, it seems that the original bug you reported (silent fail) is the duplicate of bug #1002710, bug #1003820, bug #1013386, so I'm marking it as duplicate. The behavior you report now (error message) is different from the original behavior (silent fail), so that would indicate a different bug, that you could report if you want. I don't know if the original bug is gone in your case, or if it's just masked by the new bug. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1002710 Dash will not open files with accentuated, Greek or Russian characters in their name or path -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992717 Title: Opening files from the Dash randomly doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-2d/+bug/992717/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132736] Re: Xorg fails to start after installing the hardware enablement stack on precise due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg
This bug affected me too (on Precise LTS) after purging xserver-xorg residual config once I installed xserver-xorg-lts-trusty. I can confirm that reinstalling/reconfiguring xserver-xorg-lts-trusty fixed the problem (I used apt-get --reinstall install xserver-xorg-lts- trusty). It took me a few hours to understand what was going on though. I agree with jerico that the bug is high impact and hard to debug for an average user. It looks like it can affect anybody upgrading to Trusty LTS or Trusty HWE Stack. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132736 Title: Xorg fails to start after installing the hardware enablement stack on precise due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-lts-quantal/+bug/1132736/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081123] Re: New Tab only displays the thumbnail of the first visited website of the current session despite all thumbnails being correctly generated
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081123 Title: New Tab only displays the thumbnail of the first visited website of the current session despite all thumbnails being correctly generated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1081123/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081123] Re: New Tab only displays the thumbnail of the first visited website of the current session despite all thumbnails being correctly generated
I've changed the status of this old bug to Fix Released because I can't reproduce it in the current version of Firefox (34.0). It was probably unknowingly fixed at some point during the two years since it was reported on Firefox 16.0 and 17.0. A lot of code changes in two years. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081123 Title: New Tab only displays the thumbnail of the first visited website of the current session despite all thumbnails being correctly generated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1081123/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1354863] Re: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is d
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715 package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is different from other instances of package libsane:i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1354863 Title: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is different from other instances of package libsane:i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1354863/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1437639] Re: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, gemeinsam benutztes »/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules« zu übersc
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1434782 package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: tentata sovrascrittura di /lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules (condiviso), diverso da altre istanze del pacchetto libsane:i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1437639 Title: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, gemeinsam benutztes »/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules« zu überschreiben, welches verschieden von anderen Instanzen des Paketes libsane:i386 ist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1437639/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1419533] Re: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules », qui es
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1410932 package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules », qui est différent d'autres instances du paquet libsane:i386 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715 package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is different from other instances of package libsane:i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1419533 Title: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules », qui est différent d'autres instances du paquet libsane:i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1419533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1434782] Re: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: tentata sovrascrittura di /lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules (condiviso),
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715 package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is different from other instances of package libsane:i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1434782 Title: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: tentata sovrascrittura di /lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules (condiviso), diverso da altre istanze del pacchetto libsane:i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1434782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1437639] Re: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, gemeinsam benutztes »/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules« zu übersc
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1434782 package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: tentata sovrascrittura di /lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules (condiviso), diverso da altre istanze del pacchetto libsane:i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1437639 Title: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, gemeinsam benutztes »/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules« zu überschreiben, welches verschieden von anderen Instanzen des Paketes libsane:i386 ist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1437639/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1290330] Re: package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu3 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: a tentar sobreescrever '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules' partilhado, que é
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715 package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is different from other instances of package libsane:i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290330 Title: package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu3 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: a tentar sobreescrever '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules' partilhado, que é diferente de outras instâncias do pacote libsane:i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1290330/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1318176] Re: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is dif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715 package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is different from other instances of package libsane:i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318176 Title: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is different from other instances of package libsane:i386. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1318176/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1404025] Re: package libsane 1.0.24-1.1ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, gemeinsam benutztes »/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules« zu übersc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715 package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is different from other instances of package libsane:i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404025 Title: package libsane 1.0.24-1.1ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, gemeinsam benutztes »/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules« zu überschreiben, welches verschieden von anderen Instanzen des Paketes libsane:i386 ist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1404025/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1274610] Re: package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu3 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is dif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715 package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is different from other instances of package libsane:i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1274610 Title: package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu3 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is different from other instances of package libsane:i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1274610/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1437639] Re: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, gemeinsam benutztes »/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules« zu übersc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715 package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is different from other instances of package libsane:i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1437639 Title: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, gemeinsam benutztes »/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules« zu überschreiben, welches verschieden von anderen Instanzen des Paketes libsane:i386 ist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1437639/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1410932] Re: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules », qui es
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715 package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is different from other instances of package libsane:i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1410932 Title: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules », qui est différent d'autres instances du paquet libsane:i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1410932/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1249488] Re: package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu3 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir el compartido `/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules',
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715 package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is different from other instances of package libsane:i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249488 Title: package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu3 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir el compartido `/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', que es distinto de otras instancias del paquetes libsane:i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1249488/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1426791] Re: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir el compartido `/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules'
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1186715 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186715 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1186715 package libsane 1.0.23-0ubuntu1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', which is different from other instances of package libsane:i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1426791 Title: package libsane 1.0.23-3ubuntu3.1 [modified: lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules] failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir el compartido `/lib/udev/rules.d/40-libsane.rules', que es distinto de otras instancias del paquetes libsane:i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1426791/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1442111] [NEW] Scanner is correctly identified but scan fails with sane_start: Invalid argument as root, and rebooting the computer sometimes makes things work, sometimes not
Public bug reported:
OS/Kernel: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS (GNU/Linux 3.2.0-80-generic x86_64)
Scanner: Epson Stylus Office BX305FW, USB 2.0, id 0x04b8/0x0863
SANE: libsane_1.0.22-7ubuntu1, libsane-common_1.0.22-7ubuntu1,
sane-utils_1.0.22-7ubuntu1 (up-to-date 12.04 LTS)
Epson IScan: iscan_2.30.1-1, iscan-data_1.36.0-1 (latest versions, 2015-03-23)
The scanner is correctly identified, when logged in as root:
# sane-find-scanner
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8, product=0x0863) at libusb:001:004
# lsusb
Bus 001 Device 004: ID 04b8:0863 Seiko Epson Corp.
# scanimage -L
device `epkowa:usb:001:004' is a Epson Stylus Office BX305F/BX305FW/TX320F/ME
OFFICE 620F/WorkForce 320 Series flatbed scanner
But scan fails with scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument (scanimage
frontend) or Échec de la numérisation: Impossible de démarrer la
numérisation (simple-scan frontend):
# scanimage -d epkowa:usb:001:004 -v -T
scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
The permissions of the device seem nominal:
# ls -l /dev/bus/usb/001/004
crw-rw-r--+ 1 root lp 189, 1 avril 9 12:32 /dev/bus/usb/001/004
And the following line is present in /lib/udev/rules.d/40-iscan.rules:
ATTRS{idVendor}==04b8, ATTRS{idProduct}==0863,
ENV{libsane_matched}=yes
When this problems appears, it stays so for the whole session, but
rebooting the computer sometimes makes the problem go away, sometimes
not. The only thing I can see that a reboot changes is the USB device
ID, all the rest stays the same in the previous commands output.
For instance right now the USB device ID was 001:004 and scan wasn't
working, I rebooted and it's 001:002 and scan is working. I don't know
if it is relevant, I don't understand what is causing the problem, and I
don't know how to investigate further.
SANE support for this scanner with external backend epkowa is normally
complete, and everything runs smoothly on the reboots when the problem
does not appear. Any help is appreciated. Should I report the bug
upstream, or against a different package, perhaps a USB-related or boot-
related one?
** Affects: sane-backends (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442111
Title:
Scanner is correctly identified but scan fails with sane_start:
Invalid argument as root, and rebooting the computer sometimes makes
things work, sometimes not
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1442111/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1442111] Re: Scanner is correctly identified but scan fails with sane_start: Invalid argument as root, and rebooting the computer sometimes makes things work, sometimes not
I forgot to mention, but when this problems appears, unplugging and replugging the scanner (or switching it off and on) does not make the problem go away, as far as I have noticed. Only rebooting sometimes make things work. Updated SANE from 1.0.22 (-7ubuntu1) to 1.0.25 (-git20150516-precise0) using Rolf Bensch's PPA (daily git snapshots, https://launchpad.net/~rolfbensch/+archive/ubuntu/sane-git). Now scanimage also reports an epson2 scanner besides the epkowa scanner. I believe this is because support for Epson Stylus Office BX305FW has been added in backend epson2 in SANE 1.0.25, according to the lists of supported devices available on the SANE website. Epson IScan has not changed, same version as reported. The reported behavior is still present (and still only on some boots, as reported). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442111 Title: Scanner is correctly identified but scan fails with sane_start: Invalid argument as root, and rebooting the computer sometimes makes things work, sometimes not To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1442111/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1002710] Re: Dash will not open files with accentuated, Greek or Russian characters in their name or path
** Changed in: unity-2d Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002710 Title: Dash will not open files with accentuated, Greek or Russian characters in their name or path To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/1002710/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1080811] Re: Unity 2D doesn't honor X-GNOME-FullName as launcher hover text
This bug has never been fixed and will never be fixed. Unity 2D is not used anymore. ** Changed in: unity-2d (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080811 Title: Unity 2D doesn't honor X-GNOME-FullName as launcher hover text To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/1080811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1080811] Re: Unity 2D doesn't honor X-GNOME-FullName as launcher hover text
This bug has never been fixed and will never be fixed. Unity 2D is not used anymore. ** Changed in: unity-2d Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080811 Title: Unity 2D doesn't honor X-GNOME-FullName as launcher hover text To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/1080811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132736] Re: Xorg fails to start after installing the hardware enablement stack on precise due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg
Timo: I don't know exactly for the 14.04.3 LTS -utopic to -vivid HWE upgrade, but I can confirm this bug is still present for the 14.04.3 LTS -trusty to -vivid HWE upgrade. I've just done a fresh install of 14.04.x LTS, using a PXE server so I'm not exactly sure what the x was in the image I used. On completion of the install and updates I was left with a 14.04.3 LTS and the original kernel and X server, i.e. linux-generic and xserver-xorg. I updated them to linux-generic-lts-vivid and xserver-xorg-lts-vivid. After purging the old xserver-xorg related packages, the /etc/X11/X link was gone. I still believe this bug should not be left unfixed, but perhaps that's just me. ** Summary changed: - Xorg fails to start after installing the hardware enablement stack on precise due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg + Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132736 Title: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1132736/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132736] Re: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg
Removed on precise from bug title because it happens on trusty too. ** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132736 Title: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1132736/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132736] Re: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg
Timo: sorry, I misread your comment, my bad. The symlink is gone, but indeed, as you mention, the system continues to work: X starts normally on the next boot. I wonder how. Anyway, bug fixed, starting from when you update to -vivid HWE stack (xserver-xorg-lts-vivid). Good thing, thanks to whoever did that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132736 Title: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1132736/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1431753] Re: Nvidia binary driver FTBS due to DKMS layer violation
Packages nvidia-331-* are now transitional packages for version 340 where this bug has been fixed, so I guess they can be marked as Fix Released too. Thanks everyone involved esp. Alberto for your work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431753 Title: Nvidia binary driver FTBS due to DKMS layer violation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1431753/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132736] Re: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg
** Changed in: xorg-lts-vivid (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132736 Title: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1132736/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132736] Re: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg
I've just updated another computer's HWE stack from Trusty (xserver- xorg) to Vivid (xserver-xorg-lts-vivid) and can confirm again that this bug has been fixed, starting from when you update to Vivid HWE stack. The /etc/X11/X symlink is still deleted when one purges the remnants of the previous stack, but X nevertheless starts normally at boot time. I've changed the bug status to Fix Released for xorg-lts-vivid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132736 Title: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1132736/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1480245] Re: package xserver-xorg-core-lts-vivid (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so', which is also in package xserver-xorg-vide
I ran into this bug when upgrading the HWE stack from Trusty (for the X server) and Utopic (for the kernel) to Vivid (for both). What happened is that APT removed the packages xserver-xorg, xserver- xorg-core, xserver-xorg-input-*, xserver-xorg-video-* before moving on to install their Vivid counterparts, only somehow the following three packages were not removed, and therefore were left with broken dependencies, even though they were listed in the "will be REMOVED" section: xserver-xorg-video-all, xserver-xorg-video-ati, xserver-xorg- video-glamoregl. The persistence of xserver-xorg-video-glamoregl explains the error message. On my system the following three packages were also left with broken dependencies: xorg, libegl1-mesa-drivers, nvidia-340. I was also left without a working X server of course. I tried Andy's workaround but APT refused to run the first command (sudo apt-get remove xserver-xorg-video-glamoregl) because of the broken dependencies, and trying to remove all the broken packages (sudo apt-get remove xserver-xorg-video-glamoregl xserver-xorg-video-ati xserver-xorg- video-all xorg nvidia-340 etc) only led to more broken packages appearing and APT refusing to run the command. So I let APT fix everything: it reinstalled all that it had uninstalled in the first place (the Trusty X server): $ sudo apt-get -f install Then I could apply Andy's workaround: removing the offending package: S sudo apt-get remove xserver-xorg-video-glamoregl # this also removed xserver-xorg-video-ati and xserver-xorg-video-all and then re-running the HWE stack upgrade: $ sudo apt-get install --install-recommends linux-generic-lts-vivid xserver-xorg-lts-vivid libwayland-egl1-mesa-lts-vivid # the other packages are installed as dependencies Thanks Andy! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1480245 Title: package xserver-xorg-core-lts-vivid (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so', which is also in package xserver-xorg-video-glamoregl 0.6.0-0ubuntu4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server-lts-vivid/+bug/1480245/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1490129] Re: package xserver-xorg-core-lts-vivid 2:1.17.1-0ubuntu3~trusty1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket xser
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1480245 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1480245 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1480245 package xserver-xorg-core-lts-vivid (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so', which is also in package xserver-xorg-video-glamoregl 0.6.0-0ubuntu4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1490129 Title: package xserver-xorg-core-lts-vivid 2:1.17.1-0ubuntu3~trusty1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket xserver-xorg-video-glamoregl 0.6.0-0ubuntu4 ist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server-lts-vivid/+bug/1490129/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1490159] Re: package xserver-xorg-core-lts-vivid (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: попытка перезаписать «/usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so», который уже имеется в пакете xserver-xorg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1480245 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1480245 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1480245 package xserver-xorg-core-lts-vivid (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so', which is also in package xserver-xorg-video-glamoregl 0.6.0-0ubuntu4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1490159 Title: package xserver-xorg-core-lts-vivid (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: попытка перезаписать «/usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so», который уже имеется в пакете xserver-xorg-video-glamoregl 0.6.0-0ubuntu4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server-lts-vivid/+bug/1490159/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1544221] Re: FreshPlayerPlugin display vCenter fonts incorrectly
It says on the link you posted that this bug was fixed in version 0.3.4, whose Debian package was uploaded to Debian Sid a few days ago. Since we're before DebianImportFreeze this package was imported automatically into Ubuntu's development release. So your issue is fixed in Xenial: http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/browser-plugin-freshplayer- pepperflash I'm not sure it will be fixed in Wily since it is a stable release and software in stable releases tends to be less updated by definition. After all, FreshPlayerPlugin is still at 0.3.2 in Wily, not 0.3.3: http://packages.ubuntu.com/wily/browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash Besides it's a multiverse package, and there is a large number of universe/multiverse packages relatively to the resources of the team that maintains them (the MOTU team). The majority of these packages don't receive personal attention from an Ubuntu developer, and stay at their original version, or so I have found out in my personal experience. If I understand correctly, for this package to be updated in Wily, it would have to go through the StableReleaseUpdate procedure, whose description is unfortunately beyond my understanding. I think Vincent can make sense of it though since he's the Debian maintainer: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Ubuntu/ForDebianDevelopers https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544221 Title: FreshPlayerPlugin display vCenter fonts incorrectly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freshplayerplugin/+bug/1544221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1544221] Re: FreshPlayerPlugin display vCenter fonts incorrectly
In the meantime, you could simply fetch 0.3.4 from another source than Wily's repositories. When I need a newer version of a package that is not in the Ubuntu release I use, I do one of the following: 1. Add a PPA that provides it, and install the package via apt. I currently use Alin Andrei's (WebUpd8), which provides the releases of FreshPlayerPlugin, and I've just found out about Giovanni Santini's, which provides daily builds: https://launchpad.net/~nilarimogard/+archive/ubuntu/webupd8?field.series_filter=wily https://launchpad.net/~itachi-san/+archive/ubuntu/freshplayerplugin?field.series_filter=wily 2. Download the .deb file from a newer release of Ubuntu, unless it causes dependency hell. I dpkg-scanpackages a small set of .deb files I've downloaded that way or from various printer/scanner vendors, so that it forms a small local repository that I can add to my sources.list and use with apt. But I've heard you can also double-click on the .deb file. http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/browser-plugin-freshplayer- pepperflash 3. Download the .deb file from Debian Sid, if it is only there, which happens after DebianImportFreeze and before the start of a new Ubuntu development branch. As with the previous one, this method requires dependencies to be met without too much hassle. https://packages.debian.org/sid/browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash 4. Compile the latest upstream release. This is not necessarily difficult but requires slightly more brain usage than installing precompiled packages. https://github.com/i-rinat/freshplayerplugin#install -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544221 Title: FreshPlayerPlugin display vCenter fonts incorrectly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freshplayerplugin/+bug/1544221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1544221] Re: FreshPlayerPlugin display vCenter fonts incorrectly
And while you're at it make sure your PPAPI Flash plugin is up-to-date
too by running sudo update-pepperflashplugin-nonfree {--status |
--install} if you got it from pepperflashplugin-nonfree, and by updating
adobe-flashplugin via apt if you got it from adobe-flashplugin. Might as
well update both the plugin and the wrapper.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544221
Title:
FreshPlayerPlugin display vCenter fonts incorrectly
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freshplayerplugin/+bug/1544221/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1544409] [NEW] Flash plugin is installed as a dependency of browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash (freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed by another package
Public bug reported: The browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash package (Wily, Xenial) recommends pepperflashplugin-nonfree, which downloads the PPAPI Flash plugin from Google. This is not the only way to install this plugin in Ubuntu: the adobe- flashplugin package, in Canonical's partner repository, installs it too (PPAPI and NPAPI). Shouldn't Ubuntu's version of browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash recommend pepperflashplugin-nonfree | adobe-flashplugin instead, then? Or only suggest pepperflashplugin-nonfree, as Alin Andrei's freshplayerplugin package does (WebUpd8 PPA)? Recommending pepperflashplugin-nonfree only means that a user with adobe-flashplugin will get an additional PPAPI Flash plugin when pepperflashplugin-nonfree installs as a recommended dependency of browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash. I don't know if it is that much of a problem, but I tend to be wary of this plugin, let alone two of them. I believe this is a packaging issue limited to Ubuntu since Canonical's partner repository is not intended for Debian. AFAIK Debian has a unique provider of PPAPI Flash in their repositories: pepperflashplugin- nonfree. However one could perhaps argue that the Debian package should also suggest pepperflashplugin-nonfree instead of recommending it, since it may be possible to install PPAPI Flash by other means on Debian too (I guess)? ** Affects: freshplayerplugin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Flash plugin is installed as a dependency of freshplayerplugin even if it is already installed by another package + Flash plugin is installed as a dependency of browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash (freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed by another package -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544409 Title: Flash plugin is installed as a dependency of browser-plugin- freshplayer-pepperflash (freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed by another package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freshplayerplugin/+bug/1544409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1429030] Re: netboot mini.iso doesn't support UEFI boot
I once had to install 14.04 LTS by booting from the mini ISO image on the internal hard disk instead of booting from a thumb drive made from that image (2008 Apple Macbook Pro can't boot from USB, can you believe that). I wished the EFI folder of that ISO hadn't been empty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429030 Title: netboot mini.iso doesn't support UEFI boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1429030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1544409] Re: Flash plugin is installed as a dependency of browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash (freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed by another package
Makes sense. Now we need an Ubuntu MOTU maintainer to take a look at this. I can't offer to put the alternative in place myself, it is beyond my skills (one day hopefully). > One should also probably check that there are proper Conflicts/Replaces > between pepperflashplugin-nonfree and adobe-flashplugin (in particular in > Ubuntu that provides both packages) I checked and there aren't, at least in 14.04 LTS (that I'm using). There is however a proper Conflicts between flashplugin-installer and adobe-flashplugin, that both provide NPAPI Flash, so I think it makes sense that there is one too between pepperflashplugin-nonfree and adobe- flashplugin, that both provide PPAPI Flash. I've subscribed the maintainers of the partner repository since they are in charge of adobe-flashplugin. I hope it's the way to go. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544409 Title: Flash plugin is installed as a dependency of browser-plugin- freshplayer-pepperflash (freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed by another package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freshplayerplugin/+bug/1544409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 883742] Re: Deja Dup keeps asking for password
Not a duplicate of #840393/#681002 because the GPG error is different (not "Bad CA certificate"). However it looks like it's the same as the one reported by Mathias Binke in #989750. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883742 Title: Deja Dup keeps asking for password To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/883742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1540286] Re: deja-dup asks for passphrase over and over again when doing incremental backup, never completes
Other users have reported that Déjà Dup repeatedly prompts for the passphrase over a GPG error (although not necessarily the same as yours) during incremental backups, and only successfully completes full backups. See the following bug report and add duplicate status if appropriate. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/989750 ** Package changed: deja-dup (Ubuntu) => deja-dup -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1540286 Title: deja-dup asks for passphrase over and over again when doing incremental backup, never completes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1540286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 883742] Re: Deja Dup keeps asking for password
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681002 gpg: problem with the agent: Bad CA certificate -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883742 Title: Deja Dup keeps asking for password To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/883742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989750] Re: repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked
There are several other reports of Déjà Dup repeatedly prompting for the encryption passphrase when encountering a GPG error (although not necessarily the same as that in Mathias's log) during an incremental backup, and only successfully completing full backups. See e.g. # "encrypted message has been manipulated" https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1540286 # "can't handle text lines longer than 19995 characters" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/1019293 # "block_filter 0x12345678: read error" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/883742 People still affected, check logs with 'DEJA_DUP_DEBUG=1 deja-dup --backup' to find out if your problem is triggered by the same GPG error? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989750 Title: repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/989750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 883742] Re: Deja Dup keeps asking for password
Also, same signs of full backups succeeding, so probably same bug as #989750 indeed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/989750 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883742 Title: Deja Dup keeps asking for password To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/883742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1056147] Re: Deja Dup should use inotify or Zeitgeist to get the list of changed files
** Package changed: deja-dup (Ubuntu) => deja-dup -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056147 Title: Deja Dup should use inotify or Zeitgeist to get the list of changed files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1056147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1254291] Re: Cant re-add rubbish bin to exclusions after removing
The trash can (US)/rubbish bin (UK) is at ~/.local/share/Trash and doesn't exist if you've never put anything into. Adding it back through Déjà Dup's GUI requires right-clicking in the dialog box to select Show Hidden Files and get into .local, otherwise from the command line you can run $ gsettings get org.gnome.DejaDup exclude-list to print your current excludes and then $ gsettings set org.gnome.DejaDup exclude-list "[, '\$TRASH']" So not a bug, although not obvious when you don't know where the trash is. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1254291 Title: Cant re-add rubbish bin to exclusions after removing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1254291/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1026828] Re: Backup fails with "success"
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 792763 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792763 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 792763 SMB Error: "Backup Failed. Success" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026828 Title: Backup fails with "success" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/1026828/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1526201] Re: Folders starting with a dot cannot be added to exclude/include lists
Ctrl-H, or right-clicking "Show Hidden Files", works in all Nautilus file selection dialog boxes, it's not something that's specific to Déjà Dup. I agree that I, too, discovered that feature per chance. If you think it should be easier to show hidden files and directories in file selection dialog boxes in general, you should report this against Nautilus. If you think it should be easier to show hidden files and directories in Déjà Dup only, for exclusion purposes, you could perhaps mark your bug as a duplicate of bug 1018154, which requests a way to exclude more cache directories, or bug 458044, which requests a way to exclude all hidden files and directories, cache or not. ** Summary changed: - Folders starting with a dot cannot be added to exclude/include lists + Folders starting with a dot cannot be added to exclude/include lists without first turning Show Hidden Files on ** Changed in: deja-dup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Package changed: deja-dup (Ubuntu) => deja-dup -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1526201 Title: Folders starting with a dot cannot be added to exclude/include lists without first turning Show Hidden Files on To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1526201/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1313034] Re: Deja-dup cannot make copies of some technical files
** Package changed: deja-dup (Ubuntu) => deja-dup -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313034 Title: Deja-dup reports it couldn't backup ~/.cache and ~/.gvfs even though it's not supposed to try to (also, ~/.dbus) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1313034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989750] Re: repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked
For people like Mathias having a GPG error similar to "block_filter, read error, pending bytes": DUPLICITY: ERROR 31 GPGError DUPLICITY: . GPGError: GPG Failed, see log below: DUPLICITY: . = Begin GnuPG log = DUPLICITY: . gpg: CAST5 encrypted data DUPLICITY: . gpg: encrypted with 1 passphrase DUPLICITY: . gpg: block_filter 0xdaebf0: read error (size=12376,a->size=12376) DUPLICITY: . gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=7b) DUPLICITY: . gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=3a) DUPLICITY: . gpg: mdc_packet with invalid encoding DUPLICITY: . gpg: decryption failed: invalid packet DUPLICITY: . gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=46) DUPLICITY: . gpg: block_filter: pending bytes! DUPLICITY: . = End GnuPG log = in the log of their 'DEJA_DUP_DEBUG=1 deja-dup --backup', see bug 1159177 and how it was solved for the person who reported it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989750 Title: repeatedly asks for encryption password when backing up, even though "remember password" is ticked To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/989750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1018154] Re: Doesn't exclude as many cache directories as it could
** Summary changed: - deja-dup backs-up a lot of rubbish + Doesn't exclude as many cache directories as it could ** Package changed: deja-dup (Ubuntu) => deja-dup -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1018154 Title: Doesn't exclude as many cache directories as it could To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1018154/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 458044] Re: No option to exclude all hidden files (e.g. save.txt~ or .config.txt)
** Summary changed: - déja dup does not have an option to exclude hidden files (~save.txt or .config.txt) + No option to exclude all hidden files (e.g. save.txt~ or .config.txt) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458044 Title: No option to exclude all hidden files (e.g. save.txt~ or .config.txt) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/458044/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 783730] Re: Unable to exclude files by extension/filetype
** Package changed: deja-dup (Ubuntu) => deja-dup -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783730 Title: Unable to exclude files by extension/filetype To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/783730/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1342740] Re: macfanctld keeps stderr open when daemonizing
Bugs are tracked in the project this package comes from (via a Debian repack). However they aren't fixed anyway since the project currently hasn't a developer any more. ** Package changed: macfanctld (Ubuntu) => macfanctld -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1342740 Title: macfanctld keeps stderr open when daemonizing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/macfanctld/+bug/1342740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1544409] Re: Flash plugin is installed as a dependency of browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash (freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed by another package
> I don't know if [having two PPAPI Flash plugins] is that much of a problem Come to think of it, it is: the one browser-plugin-freshplayer- pepperflash recommends, pepperflashplugin-nonfree, must be updated manually or cronly by sudo update-pepperflashplugin-nonfree --install, while the one in Canonical's partner repository, adobe-flashplugin, updates with the rest of the system when the user sudo apt-get dist- upgrade. The problem is that when the PPAPI/NPAPI wrapper, FreshPlayerPlugin, looks for a PPAPI Flash plugin in various directories where it may be, the one installed by pepperflashplugin-nonfree has a higher priority over the one installed by adobe-flashplugin: https://github.com/i-rinat/freshplayerplugin/blob/master/src/config_pepperflash.c So the wrapper will wrap the pepperflashplugin-nonfree plugin. Therefore, a user who installs adobe-flashplugin as the plugin and browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash as the wrapper will actually use pepperflashplugin-nonfree as the plugin, and if they don't notice that, there is little reason that they'll think about updating that plugin independently of the rest of their system. This will eventually lead to them using an outdated Flash plugin, with the associated security risks. I therefore sincerely believe that browser-plugin-freshplayer- pepperflash (in Ubuntu not in Debian) should recommend pepperflashplugin-nonfree | adobe-flashplugin instead of just the former, and that pepperflashplugin-nonfree and adobe-flashplugin should conflict with each other so that they don't install alongside. I've added this bug to the packages pepperflashplugin-nonfree and adobe- flashplugin to reflect that last point (the missing Conflicts), since I'm not sure it warrants its own bug report. ** Also affects: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: pepperflashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544409 Title: Flash plugin is installed as a dependency of browser-plugin- freshplayer-pepperflash (freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed by another package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/1544409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1483631] Re: Can't install vivid LTS enablement pack on Ubuntu 14.04
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1479251 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479251 Thanks for the feedback, I think the culprit may have something to do with (or perhaps be a reverse-depends of?) one of the libgl*-mesa-*-lts-:i386 libraries skype recurse-depends on, then: libgl1-mesa-dri-lts-:i386 libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-:i386 libglapi-mesa-lts-:i386 where is the release of the currently used X server, when trying to upgrade to the X server of the next release my comment 8: > in the comment line *command -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1483631 Title: Can't install vivid LTS enablement pack on Ubuntu 14.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa-lts-vivid/+bug/1483631/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1483631] Re: Can't install vivid LTS enablement pack on Ubuntu 14.04
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1479251 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479251 Louwtjie: > When I added, libqt5gui5 libgles1-mesa-lts-vivid libgles2-mesa-lts-vivid > libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-vivid, it worked and installed all the dependicies I suspect libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-vivid is enough (not 100% sure yet though, only about 65%) Also, in the comment line, xserver-xorg-core-lts-vivid xserver-xorg- video-all-lts-vivid xserver-xorg-input-all-lts-vivid are not necessary since they are dependencies of xserver-xorg-lts-vivid, I don't know why the community wiki keeps mentioning them Louwtjie, Peter, did you happen to have Skype installed (from the partner repository) when you tried upgrading the HWE stack? When upgrading from Vivid's to Wily's X server, I've noticed skype-bin:i386 recurse-depends on a few libgl*-mesa-*-lst-vivid:i386 libraries. In my case, removing Skype and autoremoving everything it recurse-depends on made it possible to run the official command line unaltered. (Subscribing you to this bug just so you get this question, sorry) Also, not sure this bug is a dup of 1479251, it's not the same error message -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1483631 Title: Can't install vivid LTS enablement pack on Ubuntu 14.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa-lts-vivid/+bug/1483631/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1544409] Re: Flash plugin from pepperflashplugin-nonfree is installed as a Recommends of browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash (source: freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed from an
** Summary changed: - Flash plugin is installed as a dependency of browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash (freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed by another package + Flash plugin from pepperflashplugin-nonfree is installed as a Recommends of browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash (source: freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed from another package -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544409 Title: Flash plugin from pepperflashplugin-nonfree is installed as a Recommends of browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash (source: freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed from another package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/1544409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1544409] Re: Flash plugin from pepperflashplugin-nonfree is installed as a Recommends of browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash (source: freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed from an
> The problem is that when the PPAPI/NPAPI wrapper, FreshPlayerPlugin, looks > for a PPAPI Flash plugin in various directories where it may be, the one > installed by pepperflashplugin-nonfree has a higher priority over the one > installed by adobe-flashplugin: [URL] This is no longer the case since 2016-02-27 in the upstream code, and the subsequent release 0.3.5 on 2016-04-12: https://github.com/i-rinat/freshplayerplugin/commit/00e41544ad29c87e3bf03d9953798f46cda9a16f Wily and Xenial still ship older versions though, packaged in browser- plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash, so this problem and its consequence are still present and this bug report is still valid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544409 Title: Flash plugin from pepperflashplugin-nonfree is installed as a Recommends of browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash (source: freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed from another package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/1544409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1544409] Re: Flash plugin from pepperflashplugin-nonfree is installed as a Recommends of browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash (source: freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed from an
For future reference and the sake of completeness: this bug is not present in Andrei Alin's version of browser-plugin-freshplayer- pepperflash (source: freshplayerplugin) from ppa:nilarimogard/webupd8, starting today and version 0.3.5-1~webupd8~trusty|...|v|w|xenial~3. His version Recommends pepperflashplugin-nonfree | adobe-flashplugin instead of just pepperflashplugin-nonfree. Thanks Andrei! So this report only concerns the version shipped with Ubuntu Wily and Xenial (and now Yakkety). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544409 Title: Flash plugin from pepperflashplugin-nonfree is installed as a Recommends of browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash (source: freshplayerplugin) even if it is already installed from another package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/1544409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1483631] Re: Can't install vivid LTS enablement pack on Ubuntu 14.04
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1479251 E: Package 'libegl1-mesa-drivers-lts-vivid' has no installation candidate -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1483631 Title: Can't install vivid LTS enablement pack on Ubuntu 14.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa-lts-vivid/+bug/1483631/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132736] Re: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg
Still affects xorg-lts-trusty (for Precise users) ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid ** Changed in: xorg-lts-trusty (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132736 Title: Xorg fails to start after installing the Hardware Enablement Stack due to missing symlink after purging old xserver-xorg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1132736/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1660556] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Paket ttf-mscorefonts-installer ist nicht bereit zur Konfiguration kann nicht konfiguriert werden (momen
Wahrscheinlich war ttf-mscorefonts-installer nicht erfolgreich installiert. Leider wird eine neue Installation ttf-mscorefonts- installer wegen bug 1607535 auch scheitern, weil es sieht aus, deine Version apt < 1.2.19 ist. Versuch mal, ttf-mscorefonts-installer zu löschen, deine apt Pakete bis 1.2.19 zu upgraden, und ttf-mscorefonts- installer wiederzuinstallieren: sudo apt-get purge ttf-mscorefonts-installer sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get dist-upgrade sudo apt-get install ttf-mscorefonts-installer Wenn du das ganze System nicht aktualisieren möchtest, schreibst du "install apt-transport-https" an Stelle von "dist-upgrade", um nur bestimmte Pakete zu aktualisieren. Die Fehlerbehebung befindet sich im apt-transport-https, aber du kannst alle aktualisierbaren apt Pakete aktualisieren, wenn du willst: du kannst sie mit "apt list --upgradable apt\*" finden. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660556 Title: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Paket ttf-mscorefonts-installer ist nicht bereit zur Konfiguration kann nicht konfiguriert werden (momentaner Status »half-installed«) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1660556/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658482] Re: Installer unable to recover from previous failures
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1607535 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607535 This is bug 1607535, fixed in package apt-transport-https 1.2.19 (released to Xenial and Yakkety on Jan 26) by Julian Klode in bug 1651923. Update apt-transport-https (and possibly the other apt packages, for good measure) to 1.2.19 (Xenial) or 1.3.4 (Yakkety), and reinstall ttf-mscorefonts-installer (or purge and install). Please report if it fails. See bug 1649203#13 if you run into Content-Range error messages. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1607535 ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts ** Summary changed: - Installer unable to recover from previous failures + Installer unable to download core fonts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658482 Title: Installer unable to download core fonts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1658482/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1660556] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Paket ttf-mscorefonts-installer ist nicht bereit zur Konfiguration kann nicht konfiguriert werden (momen
It looks like a previous install of ttf-mscorefonts-installer failed. But reinstalling it may fail because of bug 1607535, since your version of apt is apparently < 1.2.19. Try removing it completely, updating apt packages to 1.2.19, and reinstalling it: sudo apt-get purge ttf-mscorefonts-installer sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get dist-upgrade sudo apt-get install ttf-mscorefonts-installer If you don't want to upgrade your whole system, use "install apt- transport-https" instead of "dist-upgrade" to upgrade only specific packages. The fix is in apt-transport-https, but you may want to upgrade all upgradeable APT packages for consistency: you can find them with "apt list --upgradable apt\*". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660556 Title: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Paket ttf-mscorefonts-installer ist nicht bereit zur Konfiguration kann nicht konfiguriert werden (momentaner Status »half-installed«) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1660556/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658707] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer drop-priv warnings and download errors during install
Not exactly the same error message as in widely-impacting bug 1607535, but almost, and judging by the attachments to your bug report, your version of package apt-transport-https is < 1.2.19. Please update this package (and other apt packages, for good measure) to 1.2.19, and retry (reinstall ttf-mscorefonts-installer). Chances are it's the same bug, fixed in apt-transport-https 1.2.19. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658707 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer drop-priv warnings and download errors during install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1658707/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1607535] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts
Robin: Sorry I couldn't reply sooner. For 16.04, this bug has been fixed in apt-transport-https 1.2.19, released Jan 26, 2017, so you shouldn't run into it again with the Ubuntu ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4 package, provided you update apt- transport-https to 1.2.19. For 14.04, I cannot reproduce what you describe. On my own 14.04 machine, I am able to install Ubuntu's ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4 without any error. Your issue may have a different cause. If you can still reproduce it, please open a new bug report with as much information as you can give, and subscribe me to it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607535 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1607535/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1607535] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts
This bug has been fixed in apt-transport-https 1.2.19 (xenial) and 1.3.4 (yakkety), released 2017-01-26, by Julian Klode in bug 1651923. If you are still affected by it, update apt-transport-https to the appropriate version and reinstall Ubuntu's version of ttf-mscorefonts- installer. You should remove Debian's version of ttf-mscorefonts- installer beforehand, if you installed it (unless you want to keep using Debian's version of course). If you run into Content-Range errors when reinstalling ttf-mscorefonts- installer, remove the downloaded fonts in /var/lib/update-notifier /package-data-downloads/partial/ and try again. This is a different bug, also fixed recently, but not backported to Xenial and Yakkety yet (bug 1657567). ** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607535 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1607535/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1656776] Re: should depend on apt-transport-https (was: fails to download andale32.exe, spams my cron every night)
** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1656776 Title: should depend on apt-transport-https (was: fails to download andale32.exe, spams my cron every night) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1656776/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658000] Re: Package fails to install fonts
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1607535 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607535 This is bug 1607535, fixed in package apt-transport-https 1.2.19 (released to Xenial on Jan 26) by Julian Klode in bug 1651923. Update apt-transport-https (and possibly the other apt packages, for good measure) to 1.2.19, and reinstall. Please report if it fails. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1607535 ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658000 Title: Package fails to install fonts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1658000/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1655565] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer fails to download fonts
The fix for this bug has been released to Xenial on Jan 26. Can you try again? Purge Debian's ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.6, update apt- transport-https, install Ubuntu's ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4. It should work now. ** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655565 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer fails to download fonts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1655565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1437764] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer doesn't work from Ubuntu Software Center because of EULA, breaks APT
@Alain: not the same bug, you clearly have accepted the EULA already (it's written in the output). See bug 1649203/comments/13 for your Content-Range issue. Also make sure that apt-transport-https is 1.2.19 to avoid bug 1607535. Then you can remove Debian's version of ttf- mscorefonts-installer with "sudo dpkg -P /path/to/ttf-mscorefonts- installer_3.6_all.deb", and reinstall the Ubuntu one (that said the Debian version works fine too). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1437764 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer doesn't work from Ubuntu Software Center because of EULA, breaks APT To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1437764/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1655565] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer fails to download fonts
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1607535 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607535 Glad to hear ttf-mscorefonts-installer now installs successfully. I got the warnings too, they were there before (in addition to the error). They don't show up every time. This is probably something to report against update-notifier or apt-helper one day. ** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1607535 ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655565 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer fails to download fonts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1655565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1658707] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer drop-priv warnings and download errors during install
On Yakkety? That's weird. What error message does "sudo apt-get install --reinstall ttf-mscorefonts-installer" return, precisely? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1658707 Title: ttf-mscorefonts-installer drop-priv warnings and download errors during install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1658707/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1607535] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts
** Description changed:
[Symptoms]
When installing or updating the package ttf-mscorefonts-installer in
Ubuntu 16.04 or 16.10, an error message appears in a GUI window,
indicating "failure to download extra data files" (the fonts themselves)
"after package installation" (the package itself appears to have been
installed). This error message re-appears regularly, as a cron-job re-
tries the failed download.
If installing or updating from the command line, additional failure
information is given in an error message prefixed by "E:", but this
error message depends on the mirror server which is contacted for the
download: "404 Not Found" is common, but there is also "Protocol http
not supported or disabled in libcurl", and complains about invalid
Content-Range headers.
[Cause]
The current 3.4 version of ttf-mscorefonts-installer in Ubuntu 16.04
delegates the download of the proprietary Microsoft Core Fonts for the
Web (Andale, Arial...) to the package update-notifier, which itself
delegates it to the program apt-helper provided by the package apt. The
download URL points to the host downloads.sourceforge.net, which
redirects to a randomly-chosen mirror server
.dl.sourceforge.net.
Unfortunately, the program apt-helper has a bug in the way it treats
redirections. This bug makes apt-helper keep a space in the URL instead
of encoding it to %20 before contacting the mirror. It is more
extensively documented in bug 1655431 and bug 1651923. The mirror
replies to this malformed request with an error message (e.g. "404 Not
Found"), and download fails.
Some mirrors appear to understand the malformed request nonetheless, and
send the requested font file, however since there are 11 fonts to
download, the chances of getting 11 understanding mirrors are low. Hence
why the error message usually concerns andale32.exe or arial32.exe
instead of webdin32.exe.
[Workaround 1]
Download the fonts manually and put them all in the same directory. You
can use wget for that, because contrary to apt-helper, it handles
redirections fine (command line formatted for readability, do not
include line breaks and line indents):
- $ wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/
- {andale32.exe,arial32.exe,arialb32.exe,comic32.exe,courie32.exe,
- georgi32.exe,impact32.exe,times32.exe,trebuc32.exe,verdan32.exe,
- webdin32.exe}
+ $ wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/
+ {andale32.exe,arial32.exe,arialb32.exe,comic32.exe,courie32.exe,
+ georgi32.exe,impact32.exe,times32.exe,trebuc32.exe,verdan32.exe,
+ webdin32.exe}
Or you can use your browser: point it to
https://sourceforge.net/projects/corefonts/files/the%20fonts/final and
download the same files.
Make sure the package is purged and no remaining setup triggers are
remaining, using your favorite package manager or command-line APT:
- $ sudo apt-get purge ttf-mscorefonts-installer
+ $ sudo apt-get purge ttf-mscorefonts-installer
Then reinstall the package, this time pointing to the previously-
downloaded fonts in a second step:
- $ sudo apt-get install ttf-mscorefonts-installer
- # (this will most likely fail again)
- $ sudo dpkg-reconfigure ttf-mscorefonts-installer
+ $ sudo apt-get install ttf-mscorefonts-installer
+ # (this will most likely fail again)
+ $ sudo dpkg-reconfigure ttf-mscorefonts-installer
The second command should return a "graphical" interface in the
terminal. Use it to point to the directory where you downloaded the
fonts (/path/to/directory/containing/the/fonts). Make sure no .deb files
are in this directory, they seem to be picked up too and then it fails.
If a pop-up shows up for a post-install action later, just let it run,
it shouldn't come back. It may triggered by the file /var/lib/update-
notifier/user.d/data-downloads-failed and you may be successful in
avoiding the regularly-reappearing message by removing this file. But
this point is less clear.
Once everything is working, you can delete the downloaded fonts in .exe
format, they have been uncompressed and installed in
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/msttcorefonts in .ttf format.
Adapted from: Vincent Gerris (comment 17), Lesley Binks (comment 18).
[Workaround 2]
Remove Ubuntu's version of ttf-mscorefonts-installer and install
Debian's version instead. Indeed, Debian's version uses wget to download
the fonts, and contrary to apt-helper, wget handles redirections fine.
Download the package from https://packages.debian.org/ttf-mscorefonts-
installer. Version 3.6 has been tested by several users. This workaround
should work with Debian's version 3.4+nmu1 too, but then you'd be
prompted to update to Ubuntu's problematic version 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 next
time you update your packages.
To download the package with wget (command line formatted for
readability, do
[Bug 1607535] Re: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 fails to install core fonts
** Description changed:
[Symptoms]
When installing or updating the package ttf-mscorefonts-installer in
Ubuntu 16.04 or 16.10, an error message appears in a GUI window,
indicating "failure to download extra data files" (the fonts themselves)
"after package installation" (the package itself appears to have been
installed). This error message re-appears regularly, as a cron-job re-
tries the failed download.
If installing or updating from the command line, additional failure
information is given in an error message prefixed by "E:", but this
error message depends on the mirror server which is contacted for the
download: "404 Not Found" is common, but there is also "Protocol http
not supported or disabled in libcurl", and complains about invalid
Content-Range headers.
[Cause]
The current 3.4 version of ttf-mscorefonts-installer in Ubuntu 16.04
delegates the download of the proprietary Microsoft Core Fonts for the
Web (Andale, Arial...) to the package update-notifier, which itself
delegates it to the program apt-helper provided by the package apt. The
download URL points to the host downloads.sourceforge.net, which
redirects to a randomly-chosen mirror server
.dl.sourceforge.net.
Unfortunately, the program apt-helper has a bug in the way it treats
redirections. This bug makes apt-helper keep a space in the URL instead
of encoding it to %20 before contacting the mirror. It is more
extensively documented in bug 1655431 and bug 1651923. The mirror
replies to this malformed request with an error message (e.g. "404 Not
Found"), and download fails.
Some mirrors appear to understand the malformed request nonetheless, and
send the requested font file, however since there are 11 fonts to
download, the chances of getting 11 understanding mirrors are low. Hence
why the error message usually concerns andale32.exe or arial32.exe
instead of webdin32.exe.
[Workaround 1]
Download the fonts manually and put them all in the same directory. You
can use wget for that, because contrary to apt-helper, it handles
redirections fine (command line formatted for readability, do not
include line breaks and line indents):
$ wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/
{andale32.exe,arial32.exe,arialb32.exe,comic32.exe,courie32.exe,
georgi32.exe,impact32.exe,times32.exe,trebuc32.exe,verdan32.exe,
webdin32.exe}
Or you can use your browser: point it to
https://sourceforge.net/projects/corefonts/files/the%20fonts/final and
download the same files.
Make sure the package is purged and no remaining setup triggers are
remaining, using your favorite package manager or command-line APT:
$ sudo apt-get purge ttf-mscorefonts-installer
Then reinstall the package, this time pointing to the previously-
downloaded fonts in a second step:
$ sudo apt-get install ttf-mscorefonts-installer
# (this will most likely fail again)
$ sudo dpkg-reconfigure ttf-mscorefonts-installer
The second command should return a "graphical" interface in the
terminal. Use it to point to the directory where you downloaded the
fonts (/path/to/directory/containing/the/fonts). Make sure no .deb files
are in this directory, they seem to be picked up too and then it fails.
If a pop-up shows up for a post-install action later, just let it run,
it shouldn't come back. It may triggered by the file /var/lib/update-
notifier/user.d/data-downloads-failed and you may be successful in
avoiding the regularly-reappearing message by removing this file. But
this point is less clear.
Once everything is working, you can delete the downloaded fonts in .exe
format, they have been uncompressed and installed in
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/msttcorefonts in .ttf format.
Adapted from: Vincent Gerris (comment 17), Lesley Binks (comment 18).
[Workaround 2]
Remove Ubuntu's version of ttf-mscorefonts-installer and install
Debian's version instead. Indeed, Debian's version uses wget to download
the fonts, and contrary to apt-helper, wget handles redirections fine.
Download the package from https://packages.debian.org/ttf-mscorefonts-
installer. Version 3.6 has been tested by several users. This workaround
should work with Debian's version 3.4+nmu1 too, but then you'd be
prompted to update to Ubuntu's problematic version 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 next
time you update your packages.
To download the package with wget (command line formatted for
readability, do not include line break and line indent):
$ wget http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/pool/contrib/m/
msttcorefonts/ttf-mscorefonts-installer_3.6_all.deb
Purge your currently-installed Ubuntu version of the package using your
favorite package manager or command-line APT, and install the Debian
version with dpkg:
$ sudo apt-get purge ttf-mscorefonts-installer
$ sudo dpkg --install
