Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-11 Thread Sebastien Bacher

On mar, 2008-01-08 at 20:24 +, Flávio Martins wrote:

 So, I would like to hear back from you guys. Your opinions and
 concerns. 

Hi,

The bittorrent client choice has been discussed at the desktop team
meeting on IRC yesterday and nobody had an objection against the change.
The replies on the thread have some good argument, especially concerning
users who want to do something else that double clicking on a torrent to
simple start the corresponding download which was maybe not an obvious
usecase to the basic users.

Sebastien Bacher



-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-10 Thread Flávio Martins
There was a recent thread, on this list or moved to this list, with subject:
Gnome-Bt should be removed from applications menu

The fact that this thread was started, gives a hint that gnome-bt doesn't
provide much value or doesn't work how users expect. Therefore they would
prefer it removed from the menus where the other applications are.

I had a chat with Sebastien, before that thread was even started, about
introducing this torrent client as replacement for gnome-bt. I was waiting
for the 1.00 release to propose the change on this list and when it happened
that's what I did. I'm confident that a thread titled Transmission should
be removed from applications menu wouldn't show up if the change took
place.

Take in mind that the .desktop file was previously removed from the gnome-bt
package.
While gnome-bt was installed by default, I think that few users noticed the
existence of such application. Users who wanted to download a torrent
probably installed another client not knowing of the existence of gnome-bt.

Flávio Martins

On Jan 10, 2008 4:14 PM, Andrea Veri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Flávio Martins ha scritto:
 |  Transmission is a fast, easy, and free multi-platform BitTorrent
 client
 | with a focus on being lightweight yet feature-filled.
 |
 | I propose we replace, in the default installation, the packages
 | gnome-btdownload with transmission-gtk.

 Did you check some popcon statistics between the use of Gnome-bt and
 transmission in both Debian [1] and Ubuntu [2]? Plus, as Sebastien
 pointed out, what's wrong with the current gnome-btdownload package?


 [1] Transmission: http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=transmission and
 ~  Gnome-bt: http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=gnome-btdownload
 [2]  http://popcon.ubuntu.com/by_inst (search the packages by hand)
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFHhkRYNVHG4ppG+csRAqU/AJ0bvxXxB26qOqZU2ACEa5zudJ9BPwCg0GaS
 nzaTl5eUSFAa1a6uYd/szxQ=
 =viVs
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-10 Thread Andrea Veri
Flávio Martins ha scritto:
  - There is however the transmission-cli package which provides a console
 client.

I guess this is not really needed... we have some other packages 
available to be used from the command line. (ctorrent for instance)


 Do you know if anybody is looking at the launchpad bugs for this one?
   

The MOTU-P2P takes care of every P2P-related package, so feel free to 
jump in if you wanna help out. (e.g with transmission)
I would like to create a good cooperation with the transmission 
maintainers from Debian having the package synced at every revision 
pop-up as gnome-bt does at the moment. Do you think is possible? Plus is 
Debian active in maintaining this package?


-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-10 Thread Jo-Erlend Schinstad
Yes, it would be very interesting to know how many actually uses
gnome-btdownload. I don't know anyone. Most people I know, have it
installed, but uses other, more modern clients, like Azureus and
Utorrent using wine. It's quite common to seed for a long time, and
it's common to have alot of torrent files. Gnome-btdownload imposes a
limit to how many torrents you can have open, because each torrent
represents its own client instance and its own window. Of course, you
could dedicate a few workspaces to bit torrent, but that's not pretty.
And you'll have to manually open all torrent files each time you log
in. I see _no_ reason why we should have an application as default,
that people doesn't use. We should have sensible defaults, not
defaults that everyone has to replace when they first install the
system.

Jo-Erlend Schinstad

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-10 Thread Flávio Martins
On Jan 10, 2008 5:42 PM, Andrea Veri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 The MOTU-P2P takes care of every P2P-related package, so feel free to
 jump in if you wanna help out. (e.g with transmission)
 I would like to create a good cooperation with the transmission
 maintainers from Debian having the package synced at every revision
 pop-up as gnome-bt does at the moment. Do you think is possible? Plus is
 Debian active in maintaining this package?


Debian maintainers are active. A new upstream version manages to be packaged
on the day it is released. They seem very interested in transmission. I'm
sure we can cooperate with them and manage to sync the package when needed.
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-10 Thread Andrea Veri
Jo-Erlend Schinstad ha scritto:
 One question I can't find an answer to in this discussion, is why we
 want to have gnome-btdownload. 
   

Maybe because it fits fine into the GNOME Desktop? Maybe because it's 
easy and simple to use, it doesn't have tons of different configurations 
and does the work for a newbie, who just joined Ubuntu (e.g right click 
on a torrent and the trick is done). I would like to remember you that 
the torrent protocol is not well-known and usually a great number of 
people prefer to use other applications like Amule and so on. What do 
you think?


Andrea


-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-10 Thread Jo-Erlend Schinstad
On 10/01/2008, Andrea Veri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jo-Erlend Schinstad ha scritto:
  One question I can't find an answer to in this discussion, is why we
  want to have gnome-btdownload.
 

 Maybe because it fits fine into the GNOME Desktop? Maybe because it's
 easy and simple to use, it doesn't have tons of different configurations
 and does the work for a newbie, who just joined Ubuntu (e.g right click
 on a torrent and the trick is done). I would like to remember you that
 the torrent protocol is not well-known and usually a great number of
 people prefer to use other applications like Amule and so on. What do
 you think?


 Andrea


Like you, I think it's important to have a usable client. Transmission
is not any more complicated than gnome-btdownload, but it's usable for
more advanced users too.  Transmission works just the same way, except
you have one window for all torrents. The number of configuration
options is low, and sensible. I also got the impression that it's
faster, but that's just an impression.

I asked in #Ubuntu on freenode now, if anyone could recommend a bit
torrent client for Ubuntu. People actually recommended all the other
clients, except gnome-btdownload and Transmission. I thought that was
interesting. I then asked in #Ubuntu-OffTopic how people felt about
replacing gnone-btdownload, and the response was a unanimous yes.

Jo-Erlend Schinstad

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-10 Thread Jo-Erlend Schinstad
On 10/01/2008, Martin Ahnelöv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 tor 2008-01-10 klockan 03:47 +0100 skrev Jo-Erlend Schinstad:
  Hello,
 
  On 08/01/2008, Flávio Martins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Transmission is a fast, easy, and free multi-platform BitTorrent client
   with a focus on being lightweight yet feature-filled.
  
   I propose we replace, in the default installation, the packages
   gnome-btdownload with transmission-gtk.
 
  I'm all for it.
 
   I think Transmission is very user friendly, and currently is the perfect
   choice of BitTorrent client for the Gnome Desktop.
   The Gtk+ client has a well-designed and simple user interface.
 
  Yes, it's perfect for the Gnome Desktop, providing the feeling users
  are looking for in a bit torrent application, while not complicating
  things.
 [snip]
  We do need something better than
  gnome-btdownload and this is by far the best candidate I've seen.

 I would actually argue that if we would replace gnome-btdownload, it
 should be with Deluge [1], and not Transmission.

 Why?
 1. It's developed in Python with PyGTK.
 2. it's aimed intended to
 be The Choice of bittorrent client on the gnome desktop, and follows
 the gnome HIG.
 3. Very active and fast development. Monthly release cycle.
 4. Deluge is very modular, and every feature is it's own plugin: You can
 have something very simple that just works, or you could use a
 fullblown feature-set that's almost comparable to Azureus.

 [1] http://deluge-torrent.org/

 But just for the record, I don't think we need anything else than
 gnome-btdownload.

 Gasten

Well, I do see your point. However, the number of features isn't the
most important aspect, I think. Many of the more modern clients have
alot of different settings, that people also doesn't use. What I liked
best about Transmission, was the small number of sensible
configuration options. Deluge, for instance, uses configuration GUI
space to ask if you want to password protect the system tray icon. Who
uses that? It's just annoying. Fine, if people want those advanced
options, nothing is keeping them from installing Azureus or something
like that, but they certainly aren't normal users.

One question I can't find an answer to in this discussion, is why we
want to have gnome-btdownload. Because it's there? We could use that
as a point in any argument; We don't have to fix this.. People have
always managed without it.

Jo-Erlend Schinstad

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-10 Thread Andrea Veri
Jo-Erlend Schinstad ha scritto:
  I then asked in #Ubuntu-OffTopic how people felt about
 replacing gnone-btdownload, and the response was a unanimous yes.
   


Not nice to hear from a Gnome-bt's maintainer but anyway some of the 
points you reported above can be considered fair enough.


Andrea


-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-10 Thread Jo-Erlend Schinstad
  Well, I do see your point. However, the number of features isn't the
  most important aspect, I think. Many of the more modern clients have
  alot of different settings, that people also doesn't use. What I liked
  best about Transmission, was the small number of sensible
  configuration options. Deluge, for instance, uses configuration GUI
  space to ask if you want to password protect the system tray icon. Who
  uses that? It's just annoying. [snip]

 Sure, it's just annoying. it's still just a option in a configuration
 file.

 Also, you can't decide where Transmission should save the completed
 downloads (at least not by default). That is annoying. (I can imagine
 users go huh, where's the file?)

That's not true. You can decide that when you open the torrent file.
However, I feel that all downloads, no matter where they come from,
should go in /home/user/Downloads, but that's another issue.

 Transmission is also pretty ugly, and don't look good in the rest of the
 gnome-theme. On a related note, I closed it, and not until later I
 discovered that it was hiding in the systray and leaking bandwidth. Not
 nice.

 Gasten

Are you talking about the version in Gutsy or Hardy? There is a rather
significant difference. The version in Hardy has some improvements. I
agree, you should be notified when such an application is minimized to
tray and you think it's closed. However, that's just a minor bug,
which could be fixed in no time. Did you report that bug btw?

When Bit Torrent was first conceived and released, it was meant as a
way to help webservers reduce their upstream bandwidth usage. That is,
it should be similar to a normal download dialog from Internet
Explorer. However, that's not the way bit torrent is used anymore.
People use bit torrent much more like they would use eMule, Limewire,
or any other p2p application. Gnome-btdownload does not reflect this
change in behaviour. Ubuntu should make available software to fit
peoples uses, not the other way around.

Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. --
Albert Einstein.

Jo-Erlend

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As far as i'm concerned i'm very fond of transmission since it is a sngle 
windows piece of software (instead of having lost of windows)

besides it is very fast and has a clean and simple UI as mentionned by Flávio 
Martins


 Message du 08/01/08 à 21h24
 De : Flávio Martins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 A : ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
 Copie à : 
 Objet : Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default
 
  Transmission is a fast, easy, and free multi-platform BitTorrent client
 with a focus on being lightweight yet feature-filled.
 
 I propose we replace, in the default installation, the packages
 gnome-btdownload with transmission-gtk.
 
 I think Transmission is very user friendly, and currently is the perfect
 choice of BitTorrent client for the Gnome Desktop.
 The Gtk+ client has a well-designed and simple user interface.
 Fedora 8 ships transmission-gtk on their LiveCD and probably on the default
 Gnome Desktop installation too.
 For Mac OSX users Transmission is already the BitTorrent Client of choice.
 Transmission[1] is an actively developed project, you can read more about it
 on the dedicated wikipedia article[2].
 
 The packages are in the official repositories, so fi you're interested,
 just install the packages with the command: sudo apt-get install
 transmission-gtk
 
 Users of Hardy Heron will be installing version 1.0 of Transmission,
 released this month.
 Users of Ubuntu 7.10 will be running a earlier version 0.72, most similar to
 what ships in Fedora 8.
 
 So, I would like to hear back from you guys. Your opinions and concerns.
 
 
 For Ubuntu developers:
 Upstream uses Trac[3] for all the development tracking.
 Ubuntu is currently taking Debian's source packages[4] with no changes.
 
 Regards,
 Flávio Martins
 
 
 [1] http://www.transmissionbt.com
 [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_(BitTorrent_client)
 [3] http://trac.transmissionbt.com
 [4] http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/transmission.html
 
 [ (pas de nom de fichier) (0.1 Ko) ]


___
Mon PC est garanti sans DRM, sans virus et sans spyware grâce à GNU/Linux 
(Ubuntu) : ainsi je garde le contrôle de mon système.
98% des mails échangés sont en fait du spam : y participez-vous en faisant 
suivre les courriels idiots que vous recevez?


-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-10 Thread Trevor Schauls
I agree about the transmission. There are only a few things I would
recommend.

1. Download all files to ~/Downloads. Firefox too!
2.when I press the x buttion it should ask if I want to close it, or
minimize it to the tray.  


-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-10 Thread Flávio Martins
Hello,

Just go to http://trac.transmissionbt.com/ , register and submit two tickets
:)
The problem is, the Download folder is usually not existent by default, like
for example in Ubuntu. So even if you patched transmission to download to a
Download folder it should be created by default by the user or upon install
like the Documents folder is created already.
The second point already works in a different way. When you click the x
button it minimizes and when you try to quit from the menus it asks if you
are sure.

Flávio Martins

On Jan 11, 2008 12:38 AM, Trevor Schauls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I agree about the transmission. There are only a few things I would
 recommend.

 1. Download all files to ~/Downloads. Firefox too!
 2.when I press the x buttion it should ask if I want to close it, or
 minimize it to the tray.


 --
 ubuntu-desktop mailing list
 ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-10 Thread Charles Kerr
As one of the Transmission developers, I wanted to speak up and
make myself available for questions and feedback.  I like gnome-bt
but, as you'd expect, I'd love for Ubuntu to use Transmission.

To answer a couple of earlier questions:

(1) Sebastien Bacher wrote:
  Could you explain what are the gnome-btdownload issues and
  what transmission-gtk does better?

Like gnome-bt, Transmission tries to be simple and just work,
but Transmission also has MSE/PE encryption,
supports port forwarding for UPnP/NAT-PMP routers,
has the ability to choose which files in a torrent to not download,
has the ability to prioritize which files to download first,
and provides a gui for creating new torrents.

(2) Andrea Veri wrote:
  and popcorn should reach high numbers for that package as well
  (if it's *really* the best software around)...600+ users
  is not enough to promote a package to be installed as the
  main Torrent application for Ubuntu.

Transmission 1.00 has been downloaded 234,014 times since it
was released five days ago.

cheers,
Charles

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-10 Thread Jo-Erlend Schinstad
Hello,

On 11/01/2008, Charles Kerr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 As one of the Transmission developers, I wanted to speak up and
 make myself available for questions and feedback.  I like gnome-bt
 but, as you'd expect, I'd love for Ubuntu to use Transmission.

Good to have you with us. :)

 Like gnome-bt, Transmission tries to be simple and just work,
 but Transmission also has MSE/PE encryption,
 supports port forwarding for UPnP/NAT-PMP routers,
 has the ability to choose which files in a torrent to not download,
 has the ability to prioritize which files to download first,
 and provides a gui for creating new torrents.
 Transmission 1.00 has been downloaded 234,014 times since it
 was released five days ago.

That's quite a few downloads, and it's probably not counting those
coming from distro repositories? Congratulations on your success :)
You answered several of my questions, however, I have one more for
you. Does it support DHT for trackerless torrents? That seems to be
important to people.

Jo-Erlend Schinstad

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-09 Thread Jo-Erlend Schinstad
Hello,

On 08/01/2008, Flávio Martins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Transmission is a fast, easy, and free multi-platform BitTorrent client
 with a focus on being lightweight yet feature-filled.

 I propose we replace, in the default installation, the packages
 gnome-btdownload with transmission-gtk.

I'm all for it.

 I think Transmission is very user friendly, and currently is the perfect
 choice of BitTorrent client for the Gnome Desktop.
 The Gtk+ client has a well-designed and simple user interface.

Yes, it's perfect for the Gnome Desktop, providing the feeling users
are looking for in a bit torrent application, while not complicating
things. I've been using uTorrent for this for a good while, because it
provides exactly that; a simple, but effective user interface. It's a
download application. I don't want one that uses half my system
resources either. uTorrent also forced me to install wine, which I'm
not really interested in. I'd much rather have a pure and clean
system. This is a perfect client for me. Well.. You could say that
since Transmission is already in the repositories, it's my own fault
for not taking the time to get a proper overview of the applications
available before taking the radical step of installing a proprietary
Windows application. But people use either software that they already
know, or software that's already available. Bit Torrent is important
and it deserves some attention. We do need something better than
gnome-btdownload and this is by far the best candidate I've seen.

Thanks.

Jo-Erlend Schinstad

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Proposing Transmission BitTorrent client as default

2008-01-08 Thread Flávio Martins
 Transmission is a fast, easy, and free multi-platform BitTorrent client
with a focus on being lightweight yet feature-filled.

I propose we replace, in the default installation, the packages
gnome-btdownload with transmission-gtk.

I think Transmission is very user friendly, and currently is the perfect
choice of BitTorrent client for the Gnome Desktop.
The Gtk+ client has a well-designed and simple user interface.
Fedora 8 ships transmission-gtk on their LiveCD and probably on the default
Gnome Desktop installation too.
For Mac OSX users Transmission is already the BitTorrent Client of choice.
Transmission[1] is an actively developed project, you can read more about it
on the dedicated wikipedia article[2].

The packages are in the official repositories, so fi you're interested,
just install the packages with the command: sudo apt-get install
transmission-gtk

Users of Hardy Heron will be installing version 1.0 of Transmission,
released this month.
Users of Ubuntu 7.10 will be running a earlier version 0.72, most similar to
what ships in Fedora 8.

So, I would like to hear back from you guys. Your opinions and concerns.


For Ubuntu developers:
Upstream uses Trac[3] for all the development tracking.
Ubuntu is currently taking Debian's source packages[4] with no changes.

Regards,
Flávio Martins


[1] http://www.transmissionbt.com
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_(BitTorrent_client)
[3] http://trac.transmissionbt.com
[4] http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/transmission.html
-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop