Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-23 Thread Jeff Reynolds
sorry i have been out on the water chasing whales for a couple of  
weeks and am behind in the rev list.


Peter,

I beg to differ on this point. Almost all my clients are poor  
educational and charitable orgs. the big thing here (which others  
have mentioned) is total cost of use of the equipment, not just the  
hardware price. PCs only do well with small orgs when there is  
someone (usually a volunteer) that is very handy with computers and  
willing to come in and keep things going. i have had many orgs take  
donation pcs or buy cheap pcs with costs in mind only to end up  
spending horrendous amounts of time (and in some cases money) keeping  
things running. Macs have traditionally had very low total cost of  
ownership costs in many ROI studies and this has also been proven out  
many times in my personal experience in this sector. If an org does  
not have someone that can manage a pc well then it can be trouble.  
linux is totally over the heads of all the small non profits i work  
with. IT support is totally non existent with most small non profits.  
even if they have a good staff member or volunteer to keep things  
running this is dangerous since if they leave the org is screwed (i  
know i have lived through this a few times).


In education the gifts of apple equipment did get some loyalty, but  
the big reason that macs still have a large share of that market is  
that they are easy to keep going and the hardware tends to live on  
and on and on (sometimes you just want to go out and shoot an old  
machine since its so old, but still chuggin along and no one wants to  
loose a machine thats working!). they can also be managed by a  
teacher with just a little bit of computer savvy and willingness to  
just play with things. the first thing in school budgets to go are  
education IT support (administration keeps getting it) and computer  
lab instructors/managers. the support goes but the hardware is still  
there...


I had these points drive home really hard when i went back to my old  
high school to teach for a year. i had a mac lab that was a mish mash  
of like 7 or 8 models ranging in age from new to 7 or 8 years old. i  
had about 30 some odd desk tops and another 25 laptops. down the hall  
we new pc lab with 25 dells all identical and a full time tech (he  
didnt teach, just kept things running and installed stuff) who was ms  
certified up the wazoo. i was not certified in any way  
(certifications, certifications, we dont need no stinking  
certifications!) and was teaching full time. i usually had a machine  
or two down and usually they were just waiting for a hardware order  
to come in or just the spare hour to fix things. the pc lab usually  
had 4-5 machines down at any time. i would see the tech in there  
earnestly trying to fix them for hours. The pc lab was paid for by a  
grant from the business classes (they thought it was wrong to learn  
computing on a mac) and halfway through the first quarter i had most  
of the business instructors begging for some spare time in the mac  
lab to do their classes.


the last funny thing lately has been about 5 small business owners i  
know in the last 6 months have called up and asked what macs they  
should buy for their business. they were all hard core pc users and  
were all pretty savvy computer users and the last people in the world  
i would have ever thought would switch sides (each of them were some  
of my worst rassers of me using macs mostly). They all said pretty  
much exactly the same thing that they just had the last straw drawn  
and realized how much time they were wasting keeping the computers  
running instead of using the computer to do their work and get income.


personally i have had to work both sides of the fence (mac, pc and  
others) over the last 20 years and i keep realizing the same thing  
that the extra investment up front really pays off on the long run  
and i think this proves true to a lot of folks out there...


cheers

Jeffrey Reynolds


On Jul 15, 2007, at 6:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:


But for poor educational or charitable sector organizations to buy  
Minis just
seems to me a totally disordered sense of priorities.  Still more  
if a prime

purpose is to run Rev, which is (one of its pleasures) so remarkably
forgiving of low end hardware.  I have had absolutely no, zero,  
complaints
about responsiveness on our 500Mhz machine running the Rev app.   
Its instant.

If we were teaching programming on it, using Rev, I think it would be
perfectly fine and at least as responsive as a Mini.  The graphics  
are of the

same generation anyway.


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-18 Thread Mark Talluto


On Jul 16, 2007, at 3:37 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:


On 7/16/07, Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I'd say we're ready to move on, yes?


OK, Mr. BuzzKill...I'll remember NOT to invite you to my next HoDown
here in Austin ;-)

(HoDown=place where we give away Mac Mini's to all ho attend)


Nice!  Tell me when and I'll be there.
We bundle minis with one of our apps.  They make great embedded-like  
systems when one needs the Mac OS, a small footprint, and the ability  
to hook up to just about any monitor size on the planet.



Mark Talluto
--
CANELA Software
http://www.canelasoftware.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-18 Thread Mick Collins
Yes, Stephen, I have used a 17 in an airplane other than 1st Class.   
It was tight, but doable.


Have you ever used a laptop smaller than 17 anywhere but on an  
airplane?  It is fine to speak from your experience, but don't speak  
from your experience as if it is the be all and end all of everyone's  
experience.  For that matter, if you answered my question at the  
beginning of this paragraph with Yes then perhaps you are cheating  
yourself when you speak from one experience as if it is the whole of  
your experience.

   -  Mick



On Jul 16, 2007, at 2:03 AM, Stephen Barncard wrote:

Have you ever tried to use a 17 laptop in an airplane? (First  
Class is cheating).  Practical means on how much you have put up  
with moving it around.. You can shy away from any claims you like.  
I just speak from my experience.


I beg to differ.  I use the (pre-Intel) 17 PowerBook (Apple) and  
because of what I use it for (math tutoring and educational  
development and demonstration)  I could use a smaller laptop but  
that would not be practical for me for the tutoring aspect and  
no more practical for the development and demo.  Personally,  
except for the likely price with current tech, I'd love to have a  
23 laptop.  Makes me shy away from your other claims because you  
apparently make some assumptions about other people's uses that  
don't really hold water.




--


stephen barncard
s a n  f r a n c i s c o
- - -  - - - - - - - - -



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-18 Thread Mick Collins

Paul (Looney),
I have copied Stephen B's post, and your reply and my reply ... which  
was to Stephen's claim, not yours.  Sorry, I should have addressed it  
with his name.  I just thought that he was making a claim that was  
perhaps valid for him, but he was stating it as if his needs and  
evaluations were (obviously) everybody's.

   -  Mick


On Jul 15, 2007, at 10:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Mick,
To whom was your letter addressed?
Paul Looney


**
 Get a sneak peak of the
all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution









I beg to differ.  I use the (pre-Intel) 17 PowerBook (Apple) and  
because of what I use it for (math tutoring and educational  
development and demonstration)  I could use a smaller laptop but that  
would not be practical for me for the tutoring aspect and no more  
practical for the development and demo.  Personally, except for the  
likely price with current tech, I'd love to have a 23 laptop.  Makes  
me shy away from your other claims because you apparently make some  
assumptions about other people's uses that don't really hold water.



On Sunday, July 15, 2007, at 01:09PM, Stephen Barncard  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I think it also supports the 23 Cinema display. Unless one is editing
video or doing real high rez graphics, this is the biggest practical
size. Just as 15 is the biggest practical laptop...



OK, I signed too.  I rarely use my mini, preferring the MacBook Pro,
but I still like having it.

I thought about adding support for 30 inch Apple cinema display to
the wish list (the mini currently drives a 20 inch cinema display
but having it run the 30 incher would be fantastic!). However,  I'm
sure that would add way too much to the cost.  I'd be happy with a
dedicated graphics processor.

On Jul 15, 2007, at 11:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




--


stephen barncard
s a n  f r a n c i s c o
- - -  - - - - - - - - -



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-16 Thread Stephen Barncard
Have you ever tried to use a 17 laptop in an airplane? (First Class 
is cheating).  Practical means on how much you have put up with 
moving it around.. You can shy away from any claims you like. I just 
speak from my experience.


I beg to differ.  I use the (pre-Intel) 17 PowerBook (Apple) and 
because of what I use it for (math tutoring and educational 
development and demonstration)  I could use a smaller laptop but 
that would not be practical for me for the tutoring aspect and no 
more practical for the development and demo.  Personally, except 
for the likely price with current tech, I'd love to have a 23 
laptop.  Makes me shy away from your other claims because you 
apparently make some assumptions about other people's uses that 
don't really hold water.




--


stephen barncard
s a n  f r a n c i s c o
- - -  - - - - - - - - -



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-16 Thread Sivakatirswami

Mick Collins wrote:

I beg to differ.  I use the (pre-Intel) 17 PowerBook (Apple) and because of what I use it for (math 
tutoring and educational development and demonstration)  I could use a smaller laptop but that would not be 
practical for me for the tutoring aspect and no more practical for the development 
and demo.  Personally, except for the likely price with current tech, I'd love to have a 23 laptop.  
Makes me shy away from your other claims because you apparently make some assumptions about other people's 
uses that don't really hold water.


ditto that: we all upgraded to MacBooks, most everyone went for 15
for the smaller foot print as we move around a lot.

 2 of us stayed with 17 -- it really was a good decision.

1) speakers on the 15 MacBook Pro are horrible,
you can't really use them for a presentation without speakers.
But the ones on the 17 are great.

2) I use *all* the desktop space I can get... 17 plus 30
cinema display, consider these windows, which, gradually thru the day
must be open simultaneously:

My revolution PIM stack, Thunderbird, SKYPE, Firefox, (our wiki in one 
window

and a another window for surfing) usually 1-3 BBEdit
windows open, one or two windows from some other REv app that is
running, InDesign CS3, Photoshop and interarchy and then Finder windows
for  our server on the LAN. Oh yes, and possibly we might need to open
Portfolio or iView  for a quick photo catalog check... Thank God for
Drag Thing!

has nothing to do with hi rez Efficiency studies have shown that
for every square inch of desktop
space you give your staff, you save that many
hand-to-mouse window resizing and moving operations,
with significant productivity gains: it's about
window space. They have done video's over people's
shoulders and on small screen the amt of time just spent
playing with your windows sometimes approaches 20%+
of the total man hours over a month's time.

Others here think I'm kidding, but I could-would actually
use all the space on another 30 monitor if I had one.


 
On Sunday, July 15, 2007, at 01:09PM, Stephen Barncard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it also supports the 23 Cinema display. Unless one is editing 
video or doing real high rez graphics, this is the biggest practical 
size. Just as 15 is the biggest practical laptop...


OK, I signed too.  I rarely use my mini, preferring the MacBook Pro, 
but I still like having it.


I thought about adding support for 30 inch Apple cinema display to 
the wish list (the mini currently drives a 20 inch cinema display 
but having it run the 30 incher would be fantastic!). However,  I'm 
sure that would add way too much to the cost.  I'd be happy with a 
dedicated graphics processor.


On Jul 15, 2007, at 11:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


--


stephen barncard
s a n  f r a n c i s c o
- - -  - - - - - - - - -



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



--
Om shanti
(In  Peace)

Sivakatirswami
www.himalayanacademy.com

Get Hinduism Today Digital Edition. It's Free!
http://www.hinduismtoday.com/digital/

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-16 Thread Tereza Snyder


On Jul 16, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Sivakatirswami wrote:



 Efficiency studies have shown that
for every square inch of desktop
space you give your staff, you save that many
hand-to-mouse window resizing and moving operations,
with significant productivity gains: it's about
window space. They have done video's over people's
shoulders and on small screen the amt of time just spent
playing with your windows sometimes approaches 20%+
of the total man hours over a month's time.

Others here think I'm kidding, but I could-would actually
use all the space on another 30 monitor if I had one.




I know what you mean! I have two 20 monitors and there's never  
enough room! I couldn't live without CodeTek Virtual Desktop Pro. It  
allows you to have up to 100 desktops, and provides a pager  
window that shows all your application windows on their desktops and  
lets you move the miniature windows around to make the actual windows  
fly across the monitors. MacOS 10.4.6 broke VDP and I wanted to give  
up coding because I so dislike delving through layers and layers of  
windows. VDP worked again with 10.4.7—so I sat back down at the  
computer again with all my applications in their proper places and my  
windows where they belong.


Evidently, the next MacOS will have something similar built in.

t

--
Tereza Snyder
Califex Software, Inc.


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-16 Thread Scott Rossi
OK, some folks like the Mini, some folks don't.

I'd say we're ready to move on, yes?

Best Regards,

Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia  Design


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-16 Thread Chipp Walters

On 7/16/07, Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I'd say we're ready to move on, yes?


OK, Mr. BuzzKill...I'll remember NOT to invite you to my next HoDown
here in Austin ;-)

(HoDown=place where we give away Mac Mini's to all ho attend)
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-16 Thread Sarah Reichelt

I know what you mean! I have two 20 monitors and there's never
enough room! I couldn't live without CodeTek Virtual Desktop Pro.



Evidently, the next MacOS will have something similar built in.


Yes, I've played with it on a beta of Leopard. It's called Spaces and
it works really well. As happens so often, Apple has taken an old idea
but made it easy to use and terrific looking.

Sarah
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-15 Thread Judy Perry

Paul,

Sorry, Katheryn is my alternate persona  (Katherine Roet Swynford,
sister of the Philippa Roet who married the 14th C. poet Geoffrey
Chaucer).  I've studied her for about 30 years.

I'm using her now as my normal addy is unavailable due to system update.

I suspect a woman 600+ years deceased shouldn't vote.

;-)

Judy

On 7/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Judy (Katheryn),
Children, probably OK.
Dog votes, phantom votes, duplicate votes, definitely not OK.
As of this morning, only 8877 votes to go...
When the time comes that we all need a 30 monitor just to see the opening
splash screen in MS Word, those monitors will be $250 or less. I hope.
Have you been enjoying our heatwave?
Paul Looney
San Dimas
PS I'm sure you have a hundred good friends, anxious to vote when they know
about the petition: www.petitiononline.com/macminsa/petition.html



**
 Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-15 Thread Lynn Fredricks
 Who will be ?
 Paul Looney

Lets hope noone is waiting for the opportunity ;-)

Best regards,

Lynn Fredricks
Worldwide Business Operations
Runtime Revolution Ltd
http://www.runrev.com
 

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-15 Thread SimPLsol
Judy,
I remember you telling me about Katheryn at one of the conferences.
I agree that (despite possible allegations of age discrimination) 600 year 
old people should not vote (so far the petition seems to be honest and I like 
that). Having studied her for about 30 years, you may have lived her life 
longer than she did!
Paul


**
 Get a sneak peak of the all-new 
AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-15 Thread Marian Petrides
OK, I signed too.  I rarely use my mini, preferring the MacBook Pro,  
but I still like having it.


I thought about adding support for 30 inch Apple cinema display to  
the wish list (the mini currently drives a 20 inch cinema display but  
having it run the 30 incher would be fantastic!). However,  I'm sure  
that would add way too much to the cost.  I'd be happy with a  
dedicated graphics processor.


On Jul 15, 2007, at 11:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Judy,
I remember you telling me about Katheryn at one of the conferences.
I agree that (despite possible allegations of age discrimination)  
600 year
old people should not vote (so far the petition seems to be honest  
and I like
that). Having studied her for about 30 years, you may have lived  
her life

longer than she did!
Paul


**
 Get a sneak peak of the all-new
AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-15 Thread Stephen Barncard
I think it also supports the 23 Cinema display. Unless one is editing 
video or doing real high rez graphics, this is the biggest practical 
size. Just as 15 is the biggest practical laptop...


OK, I signed too.  I rarely use my mini, preferring the MacBook Pro, 
but I still like having it.


I thought about adding support for 30 inch Apple cinema display to 
the wish list (the mini currently drives a 20 inch cinema display 
but having it run the 30 incher would be fantastic!). However,  I'm 
sure that would add way too much to the cost.  I'd be happy with a 
dedicated graphics processor.


On Jul 15, 2007, at 11:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



--


stephen barncard
s a n  f r a n c i s c o
- - -  - - - - - - - - -



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-15 Thread Marian Petrides
Well, I must admit (ducking for cover), I'm using the 30 incher  
primarily as an HDTV (using an El Gato tuner), for watching videos  
and for (yes, I admit it!) playing games.  Apple TV, I don't need no  
steenkin' Apple TV, I've got my mini.  :-)))


The gaming function, in particular, pretty much requires a dedicated  
graphics card.  I'd love to be able to just leave my mini hooked up  
to the 30 inch display full time instead of attaching and detaching  
the MBP.



On Jul 15, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Stephen Barncard wrote:

I think it also supports the 23 Cinema display. Unless one is  
editing video or doing real high rez graphics, this is the biggest  
practical size. Just as 15 is the biggest practical laptop...


OK, I signed too.  I rarely use my mini, preferring the MacBook  
Pro, but I still like having it.


I thought about adding support for 30 inch Apple cinema display to  
the wish list (the mini currently drives a 20 inch cinema display  
but having it run the 30 incher would be fantastic!). However,   
I'm sure that would add way too much to the cost.  I'd be happy  
with a dedicated graphics processor.


On Jul 15, 2007, at 11:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



--


stephen barncard
s a n  f r a n c i s c o
- - -  - - - - - - - - -



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-15 Thread Jim Ault
On 7/12/07 1:30 PM, Chipp Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 My own personal saga re: the Mini.
 
I use 3 Duo mini's in a stack in the corner.
No monitor, keyboard, or RAM upgrade.
Timbuktu loaded on each.

For less than $2000 USD,  I have 3 Duo processors running 9 of my apps,
since I need CPU speed and not RAM.
Two of the Duo's have a static IP directly on the internet using a switch to
connect to the cable modem, thus accessible to our team from anywhere.

I don't use virus protection.
I do take advantage of applescript and Safari browser to do some web page
detection and data downloads.

I use an app with AltBrowser (early version) on a WinXP machine so that a
team member can view the pages that are auto-pinged for verification.

Thus 3 Duo mini's and 3 WinXP machines that work very smoothly together.  We
plan to add 2 more mini's in the next few months, and again, remote access
is all that is required.

Jim Ault
Las Vegas


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-15 Thread SimPLsol
Peter,
No one has said that a Mini is for everyone.
But a Mini is the least expensive way to run OS X on a new computer, 
something that is not at all possible with a PIII. It has the additional 
advantage for 
people developing on Rev that it will also run Windows and UNIX - so it is a 
nice test mule.
The Mini makes it possible for people switching to OS X to do so while 
continuing to use their current keyboards, mice, and monitors - a substantial 
savings over buying an iMac.
There are good used computers, both Mac and PC, that are very cost-effective 
for many organizations. Indeed, many of the businesses I work with routinely 
buy refurbished Macs from Power Max in Lake Oswego, Oregon. Picture the 
bargains when people start upgrading their current Mini-powered workstations 
and 
used Minis flood the market.
As the most affordable new modular Mac, the Mini allows businesses which need 
to upgrade regularly, a way to do so twice as often (the first Mini costs 
about the same as an all-in-one iMac, but the upgrade only requires replacing 
the 
Mini - at about half the cost of a current iMac). Even if a Mini's specs 
trail those of the current iMac, an owner only needs to keep it half as long.
Looking ahead: when PIIIs are no longer available, wouldn't it be nice to 
have lots of previously owned Minis sitting on the shelf ready to take their 
place?
Please help make it so:
www.petitiononline.com/macminsa/petition.html
8936 signatures to go!
Paul Looney


**
 Get a sneak peak of the 
all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-15 Thread Sarah Reichelt

I am not criticizing anyone who spends their own money on the thing.  There is
no accounting for tastes.  If however its money that is devoted to a purpose
that is being spent, and one is administering the funds, buying Minis strikes
me as fiscally irresponsible to the point of immorality.


While I see your point of view Peter, IMO you are ignoring the total
cost of ownership. In my case, the amount of time needed to learn a
Linux system, administer it satisfactorily, and keep it maintained,
would vastly out-weigh the extra cost of a Mac Mini in the first
place.

Regards,
Sarah
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-15 Thread Mick Collins
My two cents worth:  We tried for years to save Hypercard, but Apple wouldn't 
budge.  Now we have revolution, which isn't better on all accounts, but in some 
ways it's lots better.  Maybe letting the Mini drop will enable Apple to bring 
out another model, not better in all accounts, but, in general, better for a 
lot of people.

   -  Mick (Collins)


 
On Saturday, July 14, 2007, at 11:17AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy (Katheryn),
Children, probably OK.
Dog votes, phantom votes, duplicate votes, definitely not OK.
As of this morning, only 8877 votes to go...
When the time comes that we all need a 30 monitor just to see the opening 
splash screen in MS Word, those monitors will be $250 or less. I hope.
Have you been enjoying our heatwave?
Paul Looney
San Dimas
PS I'm sure you have a hundred good friends, anxious to vote when they know 
about the petition: www.petitiononline.com/macminsa/petition.html



**
 Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-15 Thread SimPLsol
 My two cents worth:  We tried for years to save Hypercard, but Apple 
wouldn't budge.  Now we have revolution, which isn't better on all accounts, 
but in 
some ways it's lots better.  Maybe letting the Mini drop will enable Apple to 
bring out another model, not better in all accounts, but, in general, better 
for a lot of people.

   -  Mick (Collins)

Or maybe they will just conclude no one is interested and make the $1200 iMac 
the entry computer.
I know they did not listen to use about HC (lied to us, in fact). But I think 
that campaign started after HC was already dropped. Perhaps there is a better 
chance here. Worth a shot:

www.petitiononline.com/macminsa/petition.html

Paul Looney


**
 Get a sneak peak of the 
all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-15 Thread Mick Collins
I beg to differ.  I use the (pre-Intel) 17 PowerBook (Apple) and because of 
what I use it for (math tutoring and educational development and demonstration) 
 I could use a smaller laptop but that would not be practical for me for the 
tutoring aspect and no more practical for the development and demo.  
Personally, except for the likely price with current tech, I'd love to have a 
23 laptop.  Makes me shy away from your other claims because you apparently 
make some assumptions about other people's uses that don't really hold water.

 
On Sunday, July 15, 2007, at 01:09PM, Stephen Barncard [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
I think it also supports the 23 Cinema display. Unless one is editing 
video or doing real high rez graphics, this is the biggest practical 
size. Just as 15 is the biggest practical laptop...

OK, I signed too.  I rarely use my mini, preferring the MacBook Pro, 
but I still like having it.

I thought about adding support for 30 inch Apple cinema display to 
the wish list (the mini currently drives a 20 inch cinema display 
but having it run the 30 incher would be fantastic!). However,  I'm 
sure that would add way too much to the cost.  I'd be happy with a 
dedicated graphics processor.

On Jul 15, 2007, at 11:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


-- 


stephen barncard
s a n  f r a n c i s c o
- - -  - - - - - - - - -



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-15 Thread SimPLsol
Mick,
To whom was your letter addressed?
Paul Looney


**
 Get a sneak peak of the 
all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-15 Thread Chipp Walters

On 7/15/07, Peter Alcibiades [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Look, here is what I don't get:  the combination of poor organizations,
running Rev, and Minis.  In fact, it seems positively grotesque.


Hi Peter,

I think you would agree, the Mac has long been the perceived leader in
'ease of use--ease of setup' among all PC's. That said, it is also
true they have been a huge player in the K-12 marketplace here in the
US. My daughter goes to a school which only has Macs in her grade
(5th).

For many years, Apple has donated computers to schools. Because of
this, they have garnered their fair share of loyalists there. In order
to easily add another PC to my daughter's computer class, it would
HAVE to be a Mac. More importantly, the teachers know very little of
how to configure and run Linux.

I think what Paul Looney is trying to do with his petition is to
impress upon Apple the necessity of having a low-end solution. Sure,
the Mini is not low-end by PC standards, and especially not low-end by
refurbished PC's running Linux standards, but it is a product, which,
when purchased by schools, can save a few bucks over the more
expensive Mac offerings. And some schools have no other options than
Macs for certain classrooms.

best,

Chipp
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-14 Thread Judy Perry

Paul,

Perhaps I can cast votes legitimately for both of my 6-y.o. children?
And less legitimately for our six chihuahuas?  @;-)

Rats.  That's still only 8.

No, I don't disagree with the 30 screens note, only that, well,
that'll be the day budget-wise for our department.

Judy

On 7/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Judy,
Sorry for the misapprobation and thanks for the vote.
I suspect that, the way things are going, secretaries really will need 30
monitors in the (not to distant) future. ;-)
When/if the time comes, I hope we don't have to buy Mac Pros to power them.
Can you get nine more votes for Save the Mini? I think 10,000 is the magic
number and I'm sure a lot of Mini advocates are not even aware of the petition:

www.petitiononline.com/macminsa/petition.html

Maybe we should have said Save the Mini for the kids! Thank you, again.
Paul Looney




**
 Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-14 Thread SimPLsol
Judy (Katheryn),
Children, probably OK.
Dog votes, phantom votes, duplicate votes, definitely not OK.
As of this morning, only 8877 votes to go...
When the time comes that we all need a 30 monitor just to see the opening 
splash screen in MS Word, those monitors will be $250 or less. I hope.
Have you been enjoying our heatwave?
Paul Looney
San Dimas
PS I'm sure you have a hundred good friends, anxious to vote when they know 
about the petition: www.petitiononline.com/macminsa/petition.html



**
 Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-14 Thread Lynn Fredricks
 PS I'm sure you have a hundred good friends, anxious to vote 
 when they know about the petition: 
 www.petitiononline.com/macminsa/petition.html

I scored the 999 position on the the petition :-)

The Mac Mini is the only mac in my office.

Best regards,

Lynn Fredricks
Worldwide Business Operations
Runtime Revolution Ltd
http://www.runrev.com
 

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-14 Thread SimPLsol
Lynn,
Who will be ?
Paul Looney


**
 Get a sneak peak of the 
all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-14 Thread Mark Smith

Who was 666? Or 664 (neighbour of the beast)?
:)
Mark

On 14 Jul 2007, at 19:34, Lynn Fredricks wrote:


PS I'm sure you have a hundred good friends, anxious to vote
when they know about the petition:
www.petitiononline.com/macminsa/petition.html


I scored the 999 position on the the petition :-)

The Mac Mini is the only mac in my office.

Best regards,

Lynn Fredricks
Worldwide Business Operations
Runtime Revolution Ltd
http://www.runrev.com


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-14 Thread Scott Kane

From: Mark Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Who was 666? Or 664 (neighbour of the beast)?


Aw -  I think he unsubbed from the mailing list.  vbg

Scott
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-13 Thread SimPLsol
Judy,
Sorry for the misapprobation and thanks for the vote.
I suspect that, the way things are going, secretaries really will need 30 
monitors in the (not to distant) future. ;-)
When/if the time comes, I hope we don't have to buy Mac Pros to power them. 
Can you get nine more votes for Save the Mini? I think 10,000 is the magic 
number and I'm sure a lot of Mini advocates are not even aware of the petition:

www.petitiononline.com/macminsa/petition.html

Maybe we should have said Save the Mini for the kids! Thank you, again.
Paul Looney




**
 Get a sneak peak of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-12 Thread Bill Marriott
Hi Paul,

The 13 MacBook has a pleasing, compact form factor, too. And for $1300 
gives you 1GB RAM, a 2.16 GHz Core 2 Duo, and 120 GB HD that is easily 
upgraded by a layman. (The specs spank the Mac Mini of the same price.)

It sits, lid closed, nicely and silently on my desk, attached to an IOGEAR 
4-port KVM (ironically designed to fit a Mac Mini form factor). A couple 
keystrokes and I can switch between the Mac, the Windows XP Pro, and the 
Windows Vista machines. All using the same LCD, speakers, keyboard, and 
mouse. And I never have to open the lid of the MacBook.

I just wouldn't consider purchasing a Mac Mini at ANY of the existing price 
points. I don't think it should be saved unless redesigned along the 
macosrumors info and your point #3. But then it wouldn't be a Mac Mini any 
longer.

Re: your reasons to save the Mini:

A: Yup, it's the only legal (EULA-consistent? Supported?), sub-$1K option 
for Mac OS X. But the specs on the $600 model are so poor, I wouldn't 
consider purchasing one.
B, C, D, F, G, H, I, J, K, N: All apply to the MacBook
E: By the time you get a decently configured Mini, you're paying just as 
much as you would for a MacBook that is faster, more upgradeable and better 
supported. The $600 unit is just a trap... 512MB RAM? Yuck.
L: I'm sure mouse and keyboard sales are the last thing on Apple's mind.
M: The MacBook has proven to be far more successful as a switcher computer 
than the Mini.

- WJM (aka Bill) 



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-12 Thread SimPLsol
Bill,
For $1300 you could have most of the Macbook features and a better keyboard, 
a mouse, and a much larger monitor. And then, when you decided to upgrade, you 
could get the then current Mini for $599 (hopefully by then $499) - not 
another $1300 - and keep your good keyboard, mouse and monitor.
I'm not saying the MacBook is bad. It is certainly not. Some people need a 
portable (I use a 17 PowerBook for both travel and desktop use). Some people 
need an XServe. But the Mini fills a unique niche that portables don't; for 
one example, as a headless server. And lets not forget the ability to have a 
spare Mini or two. Judy Perry (signer # 963) offered some other compelling 
reasons I had not considered. Thank you, Judy.
Of course a more contemporary Mini is desirable. I believe we'll get one - or 
there will be no Mini at all. If Apple thinks there is interest in the Mini 
they will release better models, if they think there is no interest in this 
particular form-factor they will drop it.
I see many benefits to the Mini form-factor. So, I think it worth a small bit 
of time to vote. Apparently others agree; in a little over a day the petition 
has been signed over a thousand times. I am especially gratified to see so 
many luminaries from this list on the petition.
Bill, please bear in mind, the petition allows for upgrade suggestions as 
well as an overall vote on the Minis fate. Check it out:

www.petitiononline.com/macminsa/petition.html

Be counted. Only   8993 votes to go...
Paul Looney


**
 Get a sneak peak of the 
all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-12 Thread Bill Marriott
Peter:

Fear not: Ubuntu is running under Parallels on my MacBook :)

http://wjm.org/linked/linux-on-macbook.png

...I might add I wouldn't consider doing that on a 512MB Mac Mini.

 We note that you have:

 -- XP Pro
 -- Vista
 -- MacOS

 on your desk, and that's great.  But, echoing Sherlock Holmes:
 Did you notice, Watson, the curious thing about the Linux on Bill's 
 desk?
 But, Holmes, there was no Linux on Bill's desk.
 No my dear Watson, and that is the curious thing



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-12 Thread Chipp Walters

My own personal saga re: the Mini.

I went to the Apple store to purchase one, just to have a Mac around
to test on. After pricing it, vs the MacBook, it became clear the
MacBook was a much better value. I forget the details, but AFAIRecall,
after you upgraded the processor to Core Duo and added enough RAM and
a decent size HD to make it work, you were already over $1000. So for
another couple hundred you get a MacBook-- no problem making that
decision.

If they were to price the Mini competitively, then I think it would
work just fine. But as it stands now, it's way over-priced for what
you get, IMO.

BTW, I just purchased a  Sony All-in-one VGC-LS21N  from TigerDirect
for my wife for $1,050. It has Intel(r) Core(r) 2 Duo processor, 2GB
of RAM, 250GB hard drive, a stunning 1650x1050 19 widescreen display
with XBRITE  LCD. It runs Business Vista-- and, yes Mark, it runs
Vista fast. I love this machine and think Apple should have one like
it. Only 1-wire- the AC plug. The keyboard folds up on itself to
protect the keys. Very nice Industrial Design.

Check it out: http://tinyurl.com/2hmd6m
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Why Save the Mac Mini

2007-07-12 Thread Judy Perry
Hi Paul,

Sorry to disappoint you, but I didn't make those (nice) comments.  I think
#962 must have made them.  I know that my department secretaries would
just fall over reading the claim that they need 30 monitors when we're
just happy to have a f/t sysadmin hired (after a 2 or 3 year gap).

But I signed, and I noticed so did a few other listers...

Good luck!  We want to buy a mini as our next kiddies' machine/our
downstairs desktop.  Right now, that honor belongs to our
recently-resurrected Cube.

But I agree with the bit about separating the devices that makes them
easier to upgrade/repair/replace.  That's always been one of my concerns
with all-in-one's.

Judy

On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

snip

 spare Mini or two. Judy Perry (signer # 963) offered some other compelling
 reasons I had not considered. Thank you, Judy.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution