Re: More disk space for primary storage.
The problem is that I can not launch many VMs as the primary storage of 2TB will be filled quickly. Why the primary storage could not utilize local storage on hypervisor nodes? Some other global settings? system.vm.use.local.storage=true And I have set to use local storage in my compute offering already. Local storage enabledYes On dashboard I see: Primary Storage Allocated: 1.24 TB / 1.79 TB Local Storage: Allocated: 630.28 GB / 21.21 TB Cheers, Dan 2015-03-17 16:28 GMT-05:00 Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com: Local Storage is used for UserVM and SystemVM deployment based on the values set for system.vm.use.local.storage and Local storage enabled. Of course, you need compute offering using local storage as well. Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:23 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: More disk space for primary storage. Hi, Somesh, Yes, all the local storage are listed in storage_pool table with e.g: used_bytes managed 6690078720 capacity_bytes 3886517903360 And Local storage enabledYes On dashboard I see: Primary Storage Allocated: 1.24 TB / 1.79 TB Local Storage: Allocated: 630.28 GB / 21.21 TB Confused what this Local Storage are used for? Cheers, Dan 2015-03-17 13:37 GMT-05:00 Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com: Dan, Are all the local storage listed in the storage_pool table? If so, what does the capacity_bytes column for these reflect? In addition, what do you have Local storage enabled flag set to for the Zone where the KVM hosts reside? Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 11:08 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: More disk space for primary storage. Hi, All, I found a weird situation here: 1. My cloudstack cluster contains 1 Management Server+7KVM Hypervisor nodes. 2. 1TB disk is allocated to primary storage on Management Server. 3. Each KVM Hypervisor has 4TB disk space, no manual disk partitions on it. 4. system.vm.use.local.storage=true 5. But found only 2TB size of primary storage on dashboard. So seems the 7 KVM nodes altogether contribute only 1TB for primary storage. How to allocate more disk space to primary storage? Any global settings I did not set? Thanks. Cheers, Dan
Re: More disk space for primary storage.
Yes, when I create VMs I specify the compute offering which use local storage: $list serviceofferings name = 4_Cores_2GHz_Local id = 0bdcefa2-94dd-4a8a-9702-16ce21ef9aa8 ... storagetype = local Cheers, Dan 2015-03-18 11:46 GMT-05:00 Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com: Do you have any compute offering that use local storage? Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:20 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: More disk space for primary storage. The problem is that I can not launch many VMs as the primary storage of 2TB will be filled quickly. Why the primary storage could not utilize local storage on hypervisor nodes? Some other global settings? system.vm.use.local.storage=true And I have set to use local storage in my compute offering already. Local storage enabledYes On dashboard I see: Primary Storage Allocated: 1.24 TB / 1.79 TB Local Storage: Allocated: 630.28 GB / 21.21 TB Cheers, Dan 2015-03-17 16:28 GMT-05:00 Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com: Local Storage is used for UserVM and SystemVM deployment based on the values set for system.vm.use.local.storage and Local storage enabled. Of course, you need compute offering using local storage as well. Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:23 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: More disk space for primary storage. Hi, Somesh, Yes, all the local storage are listed in storage_pool table with e.g: used_bytes managed 6690078720 capacity_bytes 3886517903360 And Local storage enabledYes On dashboard I see: Primary Storage Allocated: 1.24 TB / 1.79 TB Local Storage: Allocated: 630.28 GB / 21.21 TB Confused what this Local Storage are used for? Cheers, Dan 2015-03-17 13:37 GMT-05:00 Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com: Dan, Are all the local storage listed in the storage_pool table? If so, what does the capacity_bytes column for these reflect? In addition, what do you have Local storage enabled flag set to for the Zone where the KVM hosts reside? Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 11:08 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: More disk space for primary storage. Hi, All, I found a weird situation here: 1. My cloudstack cluster contains 1 Management Server+7KVM Hypervisor nodes. 2. 1TB disk is allocated to primary storage on Management Server. 3. Each KVM Hypervisor has 4TB disk space, no manual disk partitions on it. 4. system.vm.use.local.storage=true 5. But found only 2TB size of primary storage on dashboard. So seems the 7 KVM nodes altogether contribute only 1TB for primary storage. How to allocate more disk space to primary storage? Any global settings I did not set? Thanks. Cheers, Dan
Re: More disk space for primary storage.
Hi, Somesh, Yes, all the local storage are listed in storage_pool table with e.g: used_bytes managed 6690078720 capacity_bytes 3886517903360 And Local storage enabledYes On dashboard I see: Primary Storage Allocated: 1.24 TB / 1.79 TB Local Storage: Allocated: 630.28 GB / 21.21 TB Confused what this Local Storage are used for? Cheers, Dan 2015-03-17 13:37 GMT-05:00 Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com: Dan, Are all the local storage listed in the storage_pool table? If so, what does the capacity_bytes column for these reflect? In addition, what do you have Local storage enabled flag set to for the Zone where the KVM hosts reside? Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 11:08 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: More disk space for primary storage. Hi, All, I found a weird situation here: 1. My cloudstack cluster contains 1 Management Server+7KVM Hypervisor nodes. 2. 1TB disk is allocated to primary storage on Management Server. 3. Each KVM Hypervisor has 4TB disk space, no manual disk partitions on it. 4. system.vm.use.local.storage=true 5. But found only 2TB size of primary storage on dashboard. So seems the 7 KVM nodes altogether contribute only 1TB for primary storage. How to allocate more disk space to primary storage? Any global settings I did not set? Thanks. Cheers, Dan
More disk space for primary storage.
Hi, All, I found a weird situation here: 1. My cloudstack cluster contains 1 Management Server+7KVM Hypervisor nodes. 2. 1TB disk is allocated to primary storage on Management Server. 3. Each KVM Hypervisor has 4TB disk space, no manual disk partitions on it. 4. system.vm.use.local.storage=true 5. But found only 2TB size of primary storage on dashboard. So seems the 7 KVM nodes altogether contribute only 1TB for primary storage. How to allocate more disk space to primary storage? Any global settings I did not set? Thanks. Cheers, Dan
CS 4.5, remove templates
Hi All, In CS 4.5.0 there is no option to remove template. Is it somewhere ? Or it's bug ? Dan.
Re: CS 4.5, remove templates
Yes, template is in ready status. I used it for VM provisioning, but now i don't need. Also wanted to remove old system templates system-4.3 and 4.4, there is no option to remove them. what is status of template? ready yes no and it should show the error message on status also, were you able to upload template from this webserver before? Sent from my iPhone On Mar 16, 2015, at 2:00 PM, d...@soleks.com d...@soleks.com wrote: Hi All, In CS 4.5.0 there is no option to remove template. Is it somewhere ? Or it's bug ? Dan.
Re: CS 4.5, remove templates
Found it ! That can be the reason for The DomR template cannot be deleted. trying to remove systemvm-template-4.3 ? with this new interface, I missed that, he is right... Thanks, Sam Ceylani, MBA Computer Engineer MisterCertified Inc. 301 W. Platt St. Suite 447, Tampa, FL 33606x-apple-data-detectors://0/0 P 813tel:813.264.6460.264.6460tel:813.264.6460 M 813tel:813.416.7867.416.7867tel:813.416.7867 F 800tel:800.553.9520.553.9520tel:800.553.9520 E sam.ceyl...@mistercertified.commailto:sam.ceyl...@mistercertified.com On Mar 16, 2015, at 2:46 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: You need to go to the Zones Tab then delete it from the appropriate zone etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhttp://www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguruhttps://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://5 On 16 Mar 2015, at 19:20, Sam Ceylani s...@mistercertified.commailto:s...@mistercertified.commailto:s...@mistercertified.com wrote: what is status of template? ready yes no and it should show the error message on status also, were you able to upload template from this webserver before? Sent from my iPhone On Mar 16, 2015, at 2:00 PM, d...@soleks.commailto:d...@soleks.commailto:d...@soleks.com d...@soleks.commailto:d...@soleks.commailto:d...@soleks.com wrote: Hi All, In CS 4.5.0 there is no option to remove template. Is it somewhere ? Or it's bug ? Dan. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: unable to start CS4.5-RC4
Issue resolved. After CS 4.3.2 was removed (yum erase cloudstack-*) i removed all /usr/share/cloudstack* directories - that solve issue with CS start. There was symlink loop /usr/share/cloudstack-bridge/webapps/webapps/webapps This is common exception(I see this exception every time I restart my ms and ms works fine) , should not be the reason . On 3/13/15, 9:53 PM, d...@soleks.com d...@soleks.com wrote: Encountered IOException java.io.IOException: Stream closed at java.util.zip.ZipInputStream.ensureOpen(ZipInputStream.java:66) at java.util.zip.ZipInputStream.getNextEntry(ZipInputStream.java:115) at java.util.jar.JarInputStream.getNextEntry(JarInputStream.java:142) at java.util.jar.JarInputStream.getNextJarEntry(JarInputStream.java:179) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.serializer.OnwireClassRegistry.getFromJARF ile(OnwireClassRegistry.java:162) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.serializer.OnwireClassRegistry.getClasses( OnwireClassRegistry.java:119)
Re: custom size of disk offering.
Thank you all, I think the easiest way is still to format it and mount it to a separate dir to use this new space. So the current schema is: ROOT DISK: 10GB DATA DISK: 100GB ubuntu@node100GB:~$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 9.9G 762M 8.7G 8% / none4.0K 0 4.0K 0% /sys/fs/cgroup udev3.9G 4.0K 3.9G 1% /dev tmpfs 799M 340K 799M 1% /run none5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock none3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /run/shm none100M 0 100M 0% /run/user /dev/vda 99G 60M 94G 1% /home/ubuntu/disk2 Cheers, Dan 2015-03-13 11:15 GMT-05:00 Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com: Suresh, if I'm not wrong, this is extending LVM by adding NEW disk. Here we need to resize partition of the existing disk (after the disk itself is resized by cloudstack) I guess: So per experience so far in this situation: - increase partitons (actually eather LIVE distrivution with nice GUI, or existing OS, by deleting partition and creating it again with SAME start sector and maximum ending sector). then pvresize to resize PV. Automaticaly VG will be resized, and then LV need to be resized, and finally filesystem resize (resize2fs or similar)... best On 13 March 2015 at 17:09, Suresh Sadhu suresh.sa...@citrix.com wrote: You can manually resize the root partition safely by extending lvm partition . /dev/sda is your root partition right and what is this /dev/vda? Please refer blow link : I have used below link to resize my root partition . http://www.rootusers.com/how-to-increase-the-size-of-a-linux-lvm-by-adding-a-new-disk/ -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: 13 March 2015 21:25 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: custom size of disk offering. Hi, Andrija, Here is the result: ubuntu@node100GB:~$ sudo fdisk -l Disk /dev/vda: 107.4 GB, 107374182400 bytes 16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 208050 cylinders, total 209715200 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x Disk /dev/vda doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/sda: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes 4 heads, 32 sectors/track, 163840 cylinders, total 20971520 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x000b2a28 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 *20482097151910484736 83 Linux Seems the disk space is hidden in /dev/vda, so should I format it and mount it in order to use that space? Thanks! Cheers, Dan 2015-03-13 10:41 GMT-05:00 Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com: I dont expect your partitions and file system will be resized here... give us fdisk -land you should see bigger disk than original. Or maybe I'm wrong - some of the developers might confirm...we had discussion about weather CS will also resize partition and FS - which is I guess not the case... On 13 March 2015 at 16:36, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, All, I found when I create a new VM from a template, no matter how I set disk offering, the created new VM always has the same original size. For Example, although I specified 100GB of hard disk, the actual disk size remains ~20GB, which should come with the template itself: name = Large id = a4d52dbd-abea-452f-a8e2-bc13c661f516 created = 2014-12-08T09:47:59-0600 disksize = 100 displayoffering = True displaytext = Large Disk, 100 GB iscustomized = False storagetype = shared cloudmonkey deploy virtualmachine ... diskofferingid=a4d52dbd-abea-452f-a8e2-bc13c661f516 ... ubuntu@node100GB:~$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 9.9G 762M 8.7G 8% / none4.0K 0 4.0K 0% /sys/fs/cgroup udev3.9G 4.0K 3.9G 1% /dev tmpfs 799M 336K 799M 1% /run none5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock none3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /run/shm none100M 0 100M 0% /run/user Is there a way to let the disk offering take effect? Cheers, Dan -- Andrija Panić -- Andrija Panić
custom size of disk offering.
Hi, All, I found when I create a new VM from a template, no matter how I set disk offering, the created new VM always has the same original size. For Example, although I specified 100GB of hard disk, the actual disk size remains ~20GB, which should come with the template itself: name = Large id = a4d52dbd-abea-452f-a8e2-bc13c661f516 created = 2014-12-08T09:47:59-0600 disksize = 100 displayoffering = True displaytext = Large Disk, 100 GB iscustomized = False storagetype = shared cloudmonkey deploy virtualmachine ... diskofferingid=a4d52dbd-abea-452f-a8e2-bc13c661f516 ... ubuntu@node100GB:~$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 9.9G 762M 8.7G 8% / none4.0K 0 4.0K 0% /sys/fs/cgroup udev3.9G 4.0K 3.9G 1% /dev tmpfs 799M 336K 799M 1% /run none5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock none3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /run/shm none100M 0 100M 0% /run/user Is there a way to let the disk offering take effect? Cheers, Dan
Re: custom size of disk offering.
Hi, Andrija, Here is the result: ubuntu@node100GB:~$ sudo fdisk -l Disk /dev/vda: 107.4 GB, 107374182400 bytes 16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 208050 cylinders, total 209715200 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x Disk /dev/vda doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/sda: 10.7 GB, 10737418240 bytes 4 heads, 32 sectors/track, 163840 cylinders, total 20971520 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x000b2a28 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 *20482097151910484736 83 Linux Seems the disk space is hidden in /dev/vda, so should I format it and mount it in order to use that space? Thanks! Cheers, Dan 2015-03-13 10:41 GMT-05:00 Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com: I dont expect your partitions and file system will be resized here... give us fdisk -land you should see bigger disk than original. Or maybe I'm wrong - some of the developers might confirm...we had discussion about weather CS will also resize partition and FS - which is I guess not the case... On 13 March 2015 at 16:36, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, All, I found when I create a new VM from a template, no matter how I set disk offering, the created new VM always has the same original size. For Example, although I specified 100GB of hard disk, the actual disk size remains ~20GB, which should come with the template itself: name = Large id = a4d52dbd-abea-452f-a8e2-bc13c661f516 created = 2014-12-08T09:47:59-0600 disksize = 100 displayoffering = True displaytext = Large Disk, 100 GB iscustomized = False storagetype = shared cloudmonkey deploy virtualmachine ... diskofferingid=a4d52dbd-abea-452f-a8e2-bc13c661f516 ... ubuntu@node100GB:~$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 9.9G 762M 8.7G 8% / none4.0K 0 4.0K 0% /sys/fs/cgroup udev3.9G 4.0K 3.9G 1% /dev tmpfs 799M 336K 799M 1% /run none5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock none3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /run/shm none100M 0 100M 0% /run/user Is there a way to let the disk offering take effect? Cheers, Dan -- Andrija Panić
unable to start CS4.5-RC4
Hi All, I've downloaded 4.5-RC4, build RPM without issues (centos 6.6). Database conversion went smoothly, but eventually wasn't able to start cloudstack-management, only one error that i found in the log, not sure if it's road-blocker or easy-to-fix issue, however here is some log: 2015-03-12 17:35:57,110 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.s.OnwireClassRegistry] (main:null) Encountered IOException java.io.IOException: Stream closed at java.util.zip.ZipInputStream.ensureOpen(ZipInputStream.java:66) at java.util.zip.ZipInputStream.getNextEntry(ZipInputStream.java:115) at java.util.jar.JarInputStream.getNextEntry(JarInputStream.java:142) at java.util.jar.JarInputStream.getNextJarEntry(JarInputStream.java:179) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.serializer.OnwireClassRegistry.getFromJARFile(OnwireClassRegistry.java:162) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.serializer.OnwireClassRegistry.getClasses(OnwireClassRegistry.java:119) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.serializer.OnwireClassRegistry.getClasses(OnwireClassRegistry.java:95) at org.apache.cloudstack.framework.serializer.OnwireClassRegistry.scan(OnwireClassRegistry.java:76) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.invokeCustomInitMethod(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1608) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.invokeInitMethods(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1549) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.initializeBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1479) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.doCreateBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:521) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:458) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory$1.getObject(AbstractBeanFactory.java:295) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.getSingleton(DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.java:223) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.doGetBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:292) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.getBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:194) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultListableBeanFactory.preInstantiateSingletons(DefaultListableBeanFactory.java:628) at org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.finishBeanFactoryInitialization(AbstractApplicationContext.java:932) at org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:479) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.loadContext(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:145) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet$2.with(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:122) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:245) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:250) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:250) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:233) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.loadContexts(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:117) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.load(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:79) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.factory.ModuleBasedContextFactory.loadModules(ModuleBasedContextFactory.java:37) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.factory.CloudStackSpringContext.init(CloudStackSpringContext.java:70) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.factory.CloudStackSpringContext.init(CloudStackSpringContext.java:57) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.factory.CloudStackSpringContext.init(CloudStackSpringContext.java:61) at org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.web.CloudStackContextLoaderListener.contextInitialized(CloudStackContextLoaderListener.java:52) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart(StandardContext.java:4210) at
list virtualmachines name= problem.
Hi, I found when I try to list details of the VM with name vm-1 by: list virtualmachines name=vm-1 Cloudstack will also return me with info of another VM machine of vm-10, so I got 2 VMs info here. How to avoid this? Thanks. Cheers, Dan
Re: list virtualmachines name= problem.
Hi, Harikrishna, Thanks, surely UUID will work in this case, but why not let user decide the match pattern himself? E.g: list virtualmachines name=vm-1* to list vm-1, vm-10, vm-11 .. I think VM name is unique for all the VMs user created? It would be natural if all details of a VM could be got through its name, i.e: vm_name==vm_details Cheers, Dan 2015-03-04 12:00 GMT-06:00 Harikrishna Patnala harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com: Hi Dan, listVirtualMachine API provided with vm name gives the result of VMs where name like “%Provided_VM_name%”. As the name vm-10 is like vm-1, you are getting the result of vm-10 as well. You can try with UUID of the vm which gives you exact vm details you want, http://localhost:8080/client/api?command=listVirtualMachinesid=11b7032d-4c03-4fc0-a394-71d921c1e3ba Thanks, Harikrishna On 04-Mar-2015, at 10:01 pm, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I found when I try to list details of the VM with name vm-1 by: list virtualmachines name=vm-1 Cloudstack will also return me with info of another VM machine of vm-10, so I got 2 VMs info here. How to avoid this? Thanks. Cheers, Dan
Re: Force cleaning primary storage.
Hi, Geoff, Thanks, while I think they are mostly DATA volumes as what I see on the UI, but shouldn't they will be deleted automatically after a VM instance has been deleted and expunged? Or one has to delete DATA volumes explicitly by hand( if so, finding out which DATA volume belongs to which VM will be a problem, as the VM has already gone)? NameDATA-34 IDdf4d1b29-4c8b-4308-912e-88a7511ffdf7Zonezone1StateReadyStatus TypeDATADISKStorage TypesharedHypervisorKVMSize 30.00 GBMin IOPS Max IOPS VM IDdetachedVM display name VM state Device ID StorageprimaryCreated29 Jan 2015 11:02:49DomainROOTAccountadmin Cheers, Dan 2015-02-03 3:02 GMT-06:00 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: @All, Dan has now shared more info on his setup, anyone out there know of any known issues with KVM not cleaning up primary storage. @Dan - can you confirm we are talking about Root volumes and not Data Volumes Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 February 2015 20:14 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Force cleaning primary storage. Hi, Geoff, Thanks a lot, here are the details: 1. CloudStack version: 4.4.1 2. Hypervisor: KVM 3. Primary storage is NFS, but system.vm.use.local.storage is set to true. And: expunge.delay 360 expunge.interval 3600 expunge.workers 1 Cheers, Dan 2015-02-02 10:36 GMT-06:00 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Hi Dan, Please share the following to help the community help you 1. version of cloudstack 2. Hypervisor Type 3. Primary Storage Type e.g. NFS / iSCSI I can confirm CloudStack is supposed to delete Root Volumes from physical storage after the VM has been deleted, but Data volumes are left in CloudStack as a safeguard against accidental deletion. However if you then delete the Data volume from the UI, it will also be deleted from Primary Storage. There are some settings which control the expunge delay within CloudStack, these are: expunge.delay expunge.interval expunge.workers If you could also share what these settings are, that would also help Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 February 2015 16:12 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Force cleaning primary storage. Hi, All, I found the primary storages are keep decreasing after I create and then destroy VMs. Although the VMs are destroyed and expunged, their occupation on primary storage seems never been released( even after weeks). Is there a way to force releasing the disk space after a VM has been destroyed? Cheers, Dan Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack
SSH Key pair Authentication for Ubuntu14.04 VM of CloudStack.
Hi, I'm trying to configure VM login by SSH Key pair Authentication instead of usrename/password on Ubuntu14.04. I'm following the document as: http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/virtual_machines.html The main part is under Creating an Instance Template that Supports SSH Keys, but this example is based on CentOS system, does anybody know how to configure it on a Ubuntu machine? Thanks! Cheers, Dan
Force cleaning primary storage.
Hi, All, I found the primary storages are keep decreasing after I create and then destroy VMs. Although the VMs are destroyed and expunged, their occupation on primary storage seems never been released( even after weeks). Is there a way to force releasing the disk space after a VM has been destroyed? Cheers, Dan
Re: How to specify custom disk size by cloudmonkey CLI?
Thanks Lucian, I found I have to do it this way: customid=id-of-cusomid size=50 instead of: diskofferingid=id-of-cusomid rootdisksize=50 Cheers, Dan 2015-01-29 10:20 GMT-06:00 Nux! n...@li.nux.ro: rootdisksize=50 If you type deploy virtualmachine in cloudmonkey and hit the tab key it will list all possible options you have. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 29 January, 2015 16:11:34 Subject: How to specify custom disk size by cloudmonkey CLI? Hi, When I tried to deploy a new instance by cloudmonkey CLI for a customized disk size, e.g 50GB, how to specify the disk size? deploy virtualmachine ... diskofferingid=id-of-custom ... Error 431: This disk offering requires a custom size specified Cheers, Dan
How to specify custom disk size by cloudmonkey CLI?
Hi, When I tried to deploy a new instance by cloudmonkey CLI for a customized disk size, e.g 50GB, how to specify the disk size? deploy virtualmachine ... diskofferingid=id-of-custom ... Error 431: This disk offering requires a custom size specified Cheers, Dan
Re: Hostname and IP address of VMs created from template.
Hi, All, Thanks for all the info, by recreating the template following the document, now the newly created VMs have their IP addresses set automatically, but the hostname still keeps the hostname of the VM from which template is created. For CentOS, the hostname is set in the file /etc/sysconfig/network, apparently new VMs created did not set HOSTNAME entry from either name or displayname of the input parameter( I set hostname to localhost as stated in the document before creating the template). Cheers, Dan 2015-01-23 6:45 GMT-06:00 Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com: Hi Bhavin, Firstly the VMs Hostname is always taken from the 'name' setting and not the 'display name' this is why the name setting cannot have spaces (as Hostnames are not allowed to have spaces) but the display name can. Regarding https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Admin_Guide/append-displayname-vms.html - This setting changes how the MVs are listed on vCenter, and does not influence the VMs Hostname Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: chinu shah [mailto:chinu2...@gmail.com] Sent: 23 January 2015 02:50 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com; suresh.ramamur...@nuagenetworks.net Subject: Re: Hostname and IP address of VMs created from template. Thank you Geoff for the response, could you give insights how will it set automatically on guest VMs. According to the Documentation ( https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Admin_Guide/append-displayname-vms.html ), when we create a VM with Display name we still do not see the hostname set as display name. We are using centos CentOS 5.3(64-bit) no GUI (vSphere) provided by cloudstack. Hypervisor type is VMWare. Does the default template miss any scritps to set the hostname as display name. We have set the hostname to localhost and manually stopped and rebooted but still the hostname was not set to display name. Regards, Bhavin Shah Nuage Networks Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
cloudmonkey installation problem.
Hi, When I tried to install cloudmonkey following: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+cloudmonkey+CLI#CloudStackcloudmonkeyCLI-Usingasacommandlinetool I found this error when running the command: # cloudmonkey Import error in cloudmonkey.cloudmonkey : No module named packages Looks like a python envs problem, but no clue yet. Any hints? Thanks! Cheers, Dan
Hostname and IP address of VMs created from template.
Hi, I found that when I create new instances from template of my own( a centos OS), the IP address and hostname are not set to the VM automatically, you have to login to the VM from the UI and set them manually, then a restart will get them take effect. Does anybody else observe the same issue? Cheers, Dan
Re: cloudmonkey installation problem.
Exactly, thanks Erik! Cheers, Dan 2015-01-22 12:46 GMT-06:00 Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com: If I recall correctly you'll solve that by upgrading the 'requests' python package. Erik Den torsdag 22. januar 2015 skrev Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com følgende: Hi, When I tried to install cloudmonkey following: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+cloudmonkey+CLI#CloudStackcloudmonkeyCLI-Usingasacommandlinetool I found this error when running the command: # cloudmonkey Import error in cloudmonkey.cloudmonkey : No module named packages Looks like a python envs problem, but no clue yet. Any hints? Thanks! Cheers, Dan
Re: Number of VMs can be created on a KVM host.
Thanks Andrija, it works without affinity groups, not sure what wrong with it, but I could not see the details about the group, only type of host anti-affinity. Cheers, Dan 2014-12-02 1:24 GMT-06:00 Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com: Hi Dan, could you please try to create VMs without using afinity groups, and provide MS log output... On 2 December 2014 at 00:45, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, All, When I tried to create more than 2 VMs on my 2 KVM hosts, it failed by Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-17-VM], Please check the affinity groups provided, there may not be sufficient capacity to follow them. But each KVM host has 24 cores, 48GB RAM and 8TB of disk, the instance I tried to create is a anapshot of a VM which is 100GB size. Seems each KVM host could only create one VM here. So not clear what's the problem? Any parameters to tune? Thanks. Cheers, Dan -- Andrija Panić
VMs could not ping each other.
Hi, All, After create a few VMs on my KVM hosts, I found they could not see each other although they are in the same subnet of 192.168.0.*. The route on each of the VM is the same as: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 where 192.168.0.1 is the real gateway of the cluster. Each VM can access the gateway and the internet without problem. Is it a problem of Network Offering setting( I selected DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService when configuring my Basic Zone Configuration in the UI)? Any hints? Cheers, Dan
Number of VMs can be created on a KVM host.
Hi, All, When I tried to create more than 2 VMs on my 2 KVM hosts, it failed by Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-17-VM], Please check the affinity groups provided, there may not be sufficient capacity to follow them. But each KVM host has 24 cores, 48GB RAM and 8TB of disk, the instance I tried to create is a anapshot of a VM which is 100GB size. Seems each KVM host could only create one VM here. So not clear what's the problem? Any parameters to tune? Thanks. Cheers, Dan
Re: To let SSVM reach outside network.
Hi, Vadim, Thanks a lot and that's a bit clear now, but still confused about how to partition the network, the four NICs of SSVM are generated automatically by cloudstack, so how do you know which subnet is matched to which NIC? According to what principle should the partition be made( 4 subnet altogether?)? There's only one NIC used on the KVM host with IP addreess 192.168.0.101， do you mean to create eth0:0, eth0:1 etc and assign different IPs to them? The setup of my cloudstack is quite simple, I'm not testing any advanced or complicated experiment on it, so I'd just like to find a direct and simple way to make cloudstack up and running. root@s-1-VM:~# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1000.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth2 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 00 eth0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth2 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth3 Cheers, Dan 2014-11-25 2:01 GMT-06:00 Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee: Dan, Cloudstack guides are not perfect indeed and general rule of thumb - not to blind copy instructions. They are not wrong, but there are sometimes assumptions hided behind the scene. One of them -- you can't use plain network for everything. You must partition it. If you wish to stick to nearly the same configuration try to split you 192.168.0.0/24 network into smaller pieces like /27 or /28 subnets. Which size and how - decide by yourself. Your final routing table at SSVM should contain different interfaces connected to different net-s based on network mask. Of course you should enable inter-net connections, but since they are children of the same super-CIDR it should work automatically. Re-partition your network and copy-paste new routing table if you still have difficulties with it. Regards, Vadim. -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:00 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: To let SSVM reach outside network. Hi, Vadim, Thanks for the hints. Yes, the route table looks weird, but this comes from the official guide of network set up of cloudstack: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/hypervisor/kvm.html So I confused if the network pattern from the official guide is misleading or one should create VLANs one by one manually and set different IP address for each of them explicitly(eth0.100,eth0.200 and eth0.300)? Note that my network is nothing special, just put the Management Server, the KVM hypervisor and guest VMs all in the 192.168.0.* network. Could you suggest an simple example of how the file /etc/network/interfaces on KVM host looks like? The official pattern is as below but certainly does not work: === auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface auto eth0.100 iface eth0.100 inet static address 192.168.42.11 netmask 255.255.255.240 gateway 192.168.42.1 dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4 dns-domain lab.example.org # Public network auto cloudbr0 iface cloudbr0 inet manual bridge_ports eth0.200 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 # Private network auto cloudbr1 iface cloudbr1 inet manual bridge_ports eth0.300 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 Cheers, Dan 2014-11-23 7:51 GMT-06:00 Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee: Hello Dan, Sorry for the late reply, have to be out from internet sometimes :) You have problem with routing. According to arp table default interface -- eth2 it is not connected to you 192.168.0.* network and can't see gateway (192.168.0.100) what is not ture. Arp table looks ugly -- you have 3 interfaces connected to the same network with same Metric. How do you think VM will choose the correct one?? I suppose it will take the first one in line -- eth1 and that is why you see eth1 with complete MAC for 192.168.0.100. It always uses eth1 to reach other networks, but default gw is eth2. For me, network layout looks awkward. It is better to re-partition and re-think it. If you don't want to -- try to fix routing table manually. Put metrics to your routes and eth2 should be the highest (i.e. have lowest number). This will temporarty solve the problem, but you still have a chance to loose your changes after reboot, because routing table is created dynamically. Fix you network and I believe everything will work out-of-the box. Regards, Vadim. From: Dan Dong [dongda...@gmail.com] Sent
Re: To let SSVM reach outside network.
Hi, Vadim, Thanks for the hints. Yes, the route table looks weird, but this comes from the official guide of network set up of cloudstack: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/hypervisor/kvm.html So I confused if the network pattern from the official guide is misleading or one should create VLANs one by one manually and set different IP address for each of them explicitly(eth0.100,eth0.200 and eth0.300)? Note that my network is nothing special, just put the Management Server, the KVM hypervisor and guest VMs all in the 192.168.0.* network. Could you suggest an simple example of how the file /etc/network/interfaces on KVM host looks like? The official pattern is as below but certainly does not work: === auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface auto eth0.100 iface eth0.100 inet static address 192.168.42.11 netmask 255.255.255.240 gateway 192.168.42.1 dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4 dns-domain lab.example.org # Public network auto cloudbr0 iface cloudbr0 inet manual bridge_ports eth0.200 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 # Private network auto cloudbr1 iface cloudbr1 inet manual bridge_ports eth0.300 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 Cheers, Dan 2014-11-23 7:51 GMT-06:00 Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee: Hello Dan, Sorry for the late reply, have to be out from internet sometimes :) You have problem with routing. According to arp table default interface -- eth2 it is not connected to you 192.168.0.* network and can't see gateway (192.168.0.100) what is not ture. Arp table looks ugly -- you have 3 interfaces connected to the same network with same Metric. How do you think VM will choose the correct one?? I suppose it will take the first one in line -- eth1 and that is why you see eth1 with complete MAC for 192.168.0.100. It always uses eth1 to reach other networks, but default gw is eth2. For me, network layout looks awkward. It is better to re-partition and re-think it. If you don't want to -- try to fix routing table manually. Put metrics to your routes and eth2 should be the highest (i.e. have lowest number). This will temporarty solve the problem, but you still have a chance to loose your changes after reboot, because routing table is created dynamically. Fix you network and I believe everything will work out-of-the box. Regards, Vadim. From: Dan Dong [dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 17:45 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: To let SSVM reach outside network. Hi, Vadim, 1. route -n root@s-1-VM:~# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1000.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth2 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 00 eth0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth2 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth3 Noted that to the same 192.168.0.0 network, eth1 is searched before eth2, while eth2 is supposed to be the public NIC. Should one change the order? 2. root@s-1-VM:~# arp -n cloud (192.168.0.100) at 84:2b:2b:01:c3:d0 [ether] on eth1 cloud (192.168.0.100) at incomplete on eth2 ? (169.254.0.1) at fe:00:a9:fe:01:7a [ether] on eth0 Noted that MAC is incomplete on eth2, while MAC detected on eth1 is the correct address of the internal NIC of the Management Server(the gateway for 192.168.0.0 subnet). 3. The network layout is quite simple here( basic network): Management Server external NIC:10.* Management Server internal NIC: 192.168.0.100 KVM host NIC: 192.168.0.101 SSVM and guest VMs are all in 192.168.0.*/24 network. 4. NAT is configured on the Management Server so 192.168.0.0/24 subnet could reach the internet(download packages from internet etc., e.g, from KVM host itself) Cheers, Dan 2014-11-19 1:23 GMT-06:00 Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee: Dan, I would suggest you to use external proxy/GW to hide you network. Not the same host that contains management server. Because if you would like to scale it up - how do you do it?? Management server should be rather simple component of infrastructure and to put more functions on it is a bad idea. Anyway 1. what does route -n says on your SSVM ?? 2. If you use KVM your bridges tag the traffic. Are you sure that it is properly handled on your switch?? Run arp -a at your SSVM and see if VM knowns MAC of the gateway. I do expect you put the output of route and arp here otherwise we will continue guessing. It would be even better if you describe your network layout
Re: To let SSVM reach outside network.
Hi, Vadim, 1. route -n root@s-1-VM:~# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1000.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth2 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 00 eth0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth2 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth3 Noted that to the same 192.168.0.0 network, eth1 is searched before eth2, while eth2 is supposed to be the public NIC. Should one change the order? 2. root@s-1-VM:~# arp -n cloud (192.168.0.100) at 84:2b:2b:01:c3:d0 [ether] on eth1 cloud (192.168.0.100) at incomplete on eth2 ? (169.254.0.1) at fe:00:a9:fe:01:7a [ether] on eth0 Noted that MAC is incomplete on eth2, while MAC detected on eth1 is the correct address of the internal NIC of the Management Server(the gateway for 192.168.0.0 subnet). 3. The network layout is quite simple here( basic network): Management Server external NIC:10.* Management Server internal NIC: 192.168.0.100 KVM host NIC: 192.168.0.101 SSVM and guest VMs are all in 192.168.0.*/24 network. 4. NAT is configured on the Management Server so 192.168.0.0/24 subnet could reach the internet(download packages from internet etc., e.g, from KVM host itself) Cheers, Dan 2014-11-19 1:23 GMT-06:00 Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee: Dan, I would suggest you to use external proxy/GW to hide you network. Not the same host that contains management server. Because if you would like to scale it up - how do you do it?? Management server should be rather simple component of infrastructure and to put more functions on it is a bad idea. Anyway 1. what does route -n says on your SSVM ?? 2. If you use KVM your bridges tag the traffic. Are you sure that it is properly handled on your switch?? Run arp -a at your SSVM and see if VM knowns MAC of the gateway. I do expect you put the output of route and arp here otherwise we will continue guessing. It would be even better if you describe your network layout like on the first picture here: http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/networking_and_traffic.html Vadim. -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 5:23 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: To let SSVM reach outside network. Hi, Vadim, We have to use 2 NICs on the management server as we want to hide the cloudstack cluster behind the 10.* network, so all KVM hosts and guest VMs are in the 192.168.0.* subnet, and they connect to the management server's internal NIC(192.168.0.100). Is it a rule that the management server can only use one NIC? And the KVM hypersior host can reach the internet and download packages, but SSVM running on it could not see the internet. Cheers, Dan 2014-11-18 3:20 GMT-06:00 Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee: Hello Dan, It seems there is something wrong with your network setup and here are some places to search: 1. Why your management server has 2 NICs? It should not work as NAT, proxy or any kind of switch - keep this in mind. 2. SSVM normally has to have 3 interfaces (at least). One -- with public IP, one -- management network IP and one -- link local IP. If you have separate storage network -- it may have one more, but this is not your case. Check routing table for your SSVM with route -n command. Find your default gateway. It should be public interface. 3. Did you set up KVM hypervisor network correctly? Does it have 2 interfaces like in the setup guide? Does your hypervisor have access to internet to be able to download template? Vadim. -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 7:02 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: To let SSVM reach outside network. Hi, All, I found I could not register my ISO image to the cloudstack( through URL of http://releases.ubuntu.com/14.04.1/ubuntu-14.04.1-server-amd64.iso). The SSVM is running and health check show no problems on it. But it just could not see the outside network, although SSVM is on the same network as KVM host, i.e. 192.168.0.*. My setup is as following: Management Server external NIC:10.* Management Server internal NIC: 192.168.0.100 KVM host NIC: 192.168.0.101 guest VMs are all in 192.168.0.*/24 network. From SSVM I can ping the internal IP of the Management Server at 192.168.0.100, but could not ping the external IP of it at 10.*. From KVM host itself I can reach the outside internet as NAT is configured on the Management Server to let the 192.168.0.0 traffic through. Any hints how to let SSVM to reach the internet? Cheers, Dan
Re: To let SSVM reach outside network.
Hi, Vadim, We have to use 2 NICs on the management server as we want to hide the cloudstack cluster behind the 10.* network, so all KVM hosts and guest VMs are in the 192.168.0.* subnet, and they connect to the management server's internal NIC(192.168.0.100). Is it a rule that the management server can only use one NIC? And the KVM hypersior host can reach the internet and download packages, but SSVM running on it could not see the internet. Cheers, Dan 2014-11-18 3:20 GMT-06:00 Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee: Hello Dan, It seems there is something wrong with your network setup and here are some places to search: 1. Why your management server has 2 NICs? It should not work as NAT, proxy or any kind of switch - keep this in mind. 2. SSVM normally has to have 3 interfaces (at least). One -- with public IP, one -- management network IP and one -- link local IP. If you have separate storage network -- it may have one more, but this is not your case. Check routing table for your SSVM with route -n command. Find your default gateway. It should be public interface. 3. Did you set up KVM hypervisor network correctly? Does it have 2 interfaces like in the setup guide? Does your hypervisor have access to internet to be able to download template? Vadim. -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 7:02 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: To let SSVM reach outside network. Hi, All, I found I could not register my ISO image to the cloudstack( through URL of http://releases.ubuntu.com/14.04.1/ubuntu-14.04.1-server-amd64.iso). The SSVM is running and health check show no problems on it. But it just could not see the outside network, although SSVM is on the same network as KVM host, i.e. 192.168.0.*. My setup is as following: Management Server external NIC:10.* Management Server internal NIC: 192.168.0.100 KVM host NIC: 192.168.0.101 guest VMs are all in 192.168.0.*/24 network. From SSVM I can ping the internal IP of the Management Server at 192.168.0.100, but could not ping the external IP of it at 10.*. From KVM host itself I can reach the outside internet as NAT is configured on the Management Server to let the 192.168.0.0 traffic through. Any hints how to let SSVM to reach the internet? Cheers, Dan
To let SSVM reach outside network.
Hi, All, I found I could not register my ISO image to the cloudstack( through URL of http://releases.ubuntu.com/14.04.1/ubuntu-14.04.1-server-amd64.iso). The SSVM is running and health check show no problems on it. But it just could not see the outside network, although SSVM is on the same network as KVM host, i.e. 192.168.0.*. My setup is as following: Management Server external NIC:10.* Management Server internal NIC: 192.168.0.100 KVM host NIC: 192.168.0.101 guest VMs are all in 192.168.0.*/24 network. From SSVM I can ping the internal IP of the Management Server at 192.168.0.100, but could not ping the external IP of it at 10.*. From KVM host itself I can reach the outside internet as NAT is configured on the Management Server to let the 192.168.0.0 traffic through. Any hints how to let SSVM to reach the internet? Cheers, Dan
Re: Should one create NAT on KVM host?
Thank you all for the hints, I'm confusing about the /etc/network/interfaces configuration on my ubuntu KVM Hypervisor. If I follow the official guide, the machine just lost network connection and could not be logged in anymore. While if I add entry for eth0 itself( auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual ), SSVM could be created and get logged in, but it could not contact the Management Server, so still useless. Could anyone provide an example of the interface settings on Ubuntu KVM? Could entry of eth0.100 and eth0 coexist? http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/hypervisor/kvm.html auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface auto eth0.100 iface eth0.100 inet static address 192.168.42.11 netmask 255.255.255.240 gateway 192.168.42.1 dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4 dns-domain lab.example.org # Public network auto cloudbr0 iface cloudbr0 inet manual bridge_ports eth0.200 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 # Private network auto cloudbr1 iface cloudbr1 inet manual bridge_ports eth0.300 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 Cheers, Dan 2014-11-14 4:19 GMT-06:00 Nux! n...@li.nux.ro: Hello Dan, You don't need NAT for IPs in the same subnet to reach each other, but you will need it if you want SSVM to reach the internet (and download templates etc). Also by the sound of it you are running a Basic network with security groups, so make sure your security groups will allow VMs to get in touch, if that's what you wish. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 13 November, 2014 21:12:55 Subject: Should one create NAT on KVM host? Hi, All, I have a question on basic network configuration of cloudstack: 1. The Management Server--192.168.0.100 2. One KVM host-- 192.168.0.101 3. System VMs-- 192.168.0.110-192.168.0.120 3. The guest VMs--192.168.0.150-192.168.0.250 That is, they are all in the same network of 192.168.0.0/24, should I make NAT on the KVM host to let SSVM running on it to contact the Management Server( and the outside world)? (SSVM-KVM Host-Management Server) Cheers, Dan
Should one create NAT on KVM host?
Hi, All, I have a question on basic network configuration of cloudstack: 1. The Management Server--192.168.0.100 2. One KVM host-- 192.168.0.101 3. System VMs-- 192.168.0.110-192.168.0.120 3. The guest VMs--192.168.0.150-192.168.0.250 That is, they are all in the same network of 192.168.0.0/24, should I make NAT on the KVM host to let SSVM running on it to contact the Management Server( and the outside world)? (SSVM-KVM Host-Management Server) Cheers, Dan
Re: SSVM could not access Management Server.
Thanks Rajani, I checked that the agent is running on SSVM: root@s-1-VM:~# service cloud status CloudStack cloud service (type=secstorage) is running: process id: 3887 When I run *SSVM health check, it outputs:First DNS server is 192.168.0.100PING 192.168.0.100 (192.168.0.100): 56 data bytes64 bytes from 192.168.0.22 http://192.168.0.22: Destination Host UnreachableVr HL TOS Len ID Flg off TTL Pro cks Src Dst Data 4 5 00 5400 4859 0 0040 40 01 f05f 192.168.0.22 192.168.0.100 64 bytes from 192.168.0.22 http://192.168.0.22: Destination Host UnreachableVr HL TOS Len ID Flg off TTL Pro cks Src Dst Data 4 5 00 5400 4959 0 0040 40 01 ef5f 192.168.0.22 192.168.0.100 --- 192.168.0.100 ping statistics ---2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet lossWARNING: cannot ping DNS serverroute followsKernel IP routing tableDestination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth2192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth3* *Actually although DNS server is set to * *192.168.0.100( as it is the internal NIC of the Management Server), there are nothing on it. Just /etc/hosts mappings of hostnames and IPs.* *Could this DNS IP settings a problem? Or I should set it to 8.8.8.8, but this VMs are just private and not visible to the outside, confused here.* *cheers,Dan* 2014-11-10 22:14 GMT-06:00 Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org: Did you check if the agent is running on SSVM? This wiki might help. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting ~Rajani On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote: Some more info, on SSVM I can see the following routes, there is route there, so why SSVM(eth2: 192.168.0.134) could not contact Management Server(192.168.0.100)? Can someone help here? Thanks root@s-1-VM:~# ip route default via 192.168.0.100 dev eth2 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.1.47 172.20.10.0/24 via 192.168.0.100 dev eth1 172.20.10.30 via 192.168.0.100 dev eth1 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.22 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.134 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.25 2014-11-10 15:12 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com: Hi, All, When debugging why my ISOs could not be registered, I found when I logged into SSVM, I could not even ping the Management Server, although they are both in the 192.168.0.0/24 network, so of course could not ping outside world. Here are my simple network settings of my cloud(1Management Server + 1 KVM hypervisor): 1. Management server have 2 NICs: em2 pointing outside with 10.0.0.100/24 em1 pointing inside with 192.168.0.100/24 (also serves as DNS and Gateway of the cloud) 2. One KVM hypervisor which has 1 NIC: em1 with 192.168.0.101/24 3. VMs created on KVM hypervisor will sit on the same network of 192.168.0.0/24 The weird thing is that I can access the internet from the KVM hypervisor as NAT is enabled on the Management Server, but for the SSVM(IP of eth2: 192.168.0.89) running on it, it could not even see the Management Server(192.168.0.100 on em1). Should one manually re-configure routing tables on the SSVM to solve this problem or it is caused by the initial network design of the cloud? Thanks! Cheers, Dan
Confusable default routing table on SSVM.
Hi, All, When debugging why my SSVM could not access outside, I see the following route table on SSVM: root@s-1-VM:~# ip route show 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.1.47 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.22 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.134 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.25 There are 3 rules to reach the same subnet of 192.168.0.0/24 through different NICs. The problem is that SSVM could not ping both the KVM host(192.168.0.101) on which the SSVM is running and the Management Server(192.168.0.100, it is also set to be the gateway of the 192.168.0.0/24 network), although they are all on the same subnet. I suspect it is the bridge setings of the KVM, but no clues yet. Any hints? root@comp11:/etc# cat /etc/network/interfaces # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface auto em1 iface em1 inet static address 192.168.0.101 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 192.168.0.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255 gateway 192.168.0.100 dns-nameservers 192.168.0.100 #=CloudStack Network Bridges # Public network auto cloudbr0 iface cloudbr0 inet manual bridge_ports em1.200 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 # Private network auto cloudbr1 iface cloudbr1 inet manual bridge_ports em1.300 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 Cheers, Dan
Re: Confusable default routing table on SSVM.
Hi, All, Can experts examine the settings above if they are problematic? Could Management Server, KVM host and VMs all sit in the same 192.168.0.0/24 network? I checked a lot but have no idea, all firewalls have been turned off but still the SSVM could not contact Management server and the outside. Thanks a lot! Cheers, Dan 2014-11-11 10:29 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com: Hi, All, When debugging why my SSVM could not access outside, I see the following route table on SSVM: root@s-1-VM:~# ip route show 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.1.47 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.22 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.134 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.25 There are 3 rules to reach the same subnet of 192.168.0.0/24 through different NICs. The problem is that SSVM could not ping both the KVM host(192.168.0.101) on which the SSVM is running and the Management Server(192.168.0.100, it is also set to be the gateway of the 192.168.0.0/24 network), although they are all on the same subnet. I suspect it is the bridge setings of the KVM, but no clues yet. Any hints? root@comp11:/etc# cat /etc/network/interfaces # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface auto em1 iface em1 inet static address 192.168.0.101 netmask 255.255.255.0 network 192.168.0.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255 gateway 192.168.0.100 dns-nameservers 192.168.0.100 #=CloudStack Network Bridges # Public network auto cloudbr0 iface cloudbr0 inet manual bridge_ports em1.200 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 # Private network auto cloudbr1 iface cloudbr1 inet manual bridge_ports em1.300 bridge_fd 5 bridge_stp off bridge_maxwait 1 Cheers, Dan
Re: Network setup questions.
Hi, Sanjeev, Thanks, I do not have a web server locally, I want the ISOs to be downloaded and registered by pointing to a URL of official Ubuntu iso(e.g http://releases.ubuntu.com/14.04.1/ubuntu-14.04.1-server-amd64.iso). I have a question about the Gateway setting of the cloudstack, in the above schema, I set it to 192.169.0.100, which will also be the Gateway for the VMs created, but I found in the SSVM console, it could not access the internet, so it could not download any ISOs from the internet. Is the Gateway setting to the internal NIC of the Management Server wrong(NAT is enabled and KVM hosts could access the internet without problem)? Thanks! Cheers, Dan 2014-11-07 23:30 GMT-06:00 Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com: Option 2 should work fine. For ISOs to register you may need to set the global setting parameter allowed.internal.sites to your web server cidr. -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2014 2:32 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Network setup questions. Hi, all, I have a simple network setup in my cloud as: 1. Management server have 2 NICs: em2 pointing outside with 10.0.0.100/24 em1 pointing inside with 192.168.0.100/24 (also serves as DNS and Gateway of the cloud) 2. One KVM hypervisor which has 1 NIC: em1 with 192.168.0.101/24 3. VMs created on KVM hypervisor will sit on the same network of 192.168.0.0/24 My question is when I configuring em1 on the KVM hypervisor, if I configure it according to the guide: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/hypervisor/kvm.html The network simply get down and the host could not be accessible through ssh. The settings is as following, for option2, network works but could not register my ISOs to the zone, so which option to take?(NAT already configured on Management server so KVM hypervisor could access the internet) KVM# cat /etc/network/interfaces auto lo iface lo inet loopback ==option 1 auto em1.100 iface em1.100 inet static address 192.168.0.101 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.168.0.100 dns-nameservers 192.168.0.100 ===option 2=== auto em1 iface em1 inet static address 192.168.0.101 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.168.0.100 dns-nameservers 192.168.0.100 auto cloudbr0 ... auto cloudbr1 ... Cheers, Dan
SSVM could not access Management Server.
Hi, All, When debugging why my ISOs could not be registered, I found when I logged into SSVM, I could not even ping the Management Server, although they are both in the 192.168.0.0/24 network, so of course could not ping outside world. Here are my simple network settings of my cloud(1Management Server + 1 KVM hypervisor): 1. Management server have 2 NICs: em2 pointing outside with 10.0.0.100/24 em1 pointing inside with 192.168.0.100/24 (also serves as DNS and Gateway of the cloud) 2. One KVM hypervisor which has 1 NIC: em1 with 192.168.0.101/24 3. VMs created on KVM hypervisor will sit on the same network of 192.168.0.0/24 The weird thing is that I can access the internet from the KVM hypervisor as NAT is enabled on the Management Server, but for the SSVM(IP of eth2: 192.168.0.89) running on it, it could not even see the Management Server(192.168.0.100 on em1). Should one manually re-configure routing tables on the SSVM to solve this problem or it is caused by the initial network design of the cloud? Thanks! Cheers, Dan
Re: SSVM could not access Management Server.
Some more info, on SSVM I can see the following routes, there is route there, so why SSVM(eth2: 192.168.0.134) could not contact Management Server(192.168.0.100)? Can someone help here? Thanks root@s-1-VM:~# ip route default via 192.168.0.100 dev eth2 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.1.47 172.20.10.0/24 via 192.168.0.100 dev eth1 172.20.10.30 via 192.168.0.100 dev eth1 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.22 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.134 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.25 2014-11-10 15:12 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com: Hi, All, When debugging why my ISOs could not be registered, I found when I logged into SSVM, I could not even ping the Management Server, although they are both in the 192.168.0.0/24 network, so of course could not ping outside world. Here are my simple network settings of my cloud(1Management Server + 1 KVM hypervisor): 1. Management server have 2 NICs: em2 pointing outside with 10.0.0.100/24 em1 pointing inside with 192.168.0.100/24 (also serves as DNS and Gateway of the cloud) 2. One KVM hypervisor which has 1 NIC: em1 with 192.168.0.101/24 3. VMs created on KVM hypervisor will sit on the same network of 192.168.0.0/24 The weird thing is that I can access the internet from the KVM hypervisor as NAT is enabled on the Management Server, but for the SSVM(IP of eth2: 192.168.0.89) running on it, it could not even see the Management Server(192.168.0.100 on em1). Should one manually re-configure routing tables on the SSVM to solve this problem or it is caused by the initial network design of the cloud? Thanks! Cheers, Dan
Network setup questions.
Hi, all, I have a simple network setup in my cloud as: 1. Management server have 2 NICs: em2 pointing outside with 10.0.0.100/24 em1 pointing inside with 192.168.0.100/24 (also serves as DNS and Gateway of the cloud) 2. One KVM hypervisor which has 1 NIC: em1 with 192.168.0.101/24 3. VMs created on KVM hypervisor will sit on the same network of 192.168.0.0/24 My question is when I configuring em1 on the KVM hypervisor, if I configure it according to the guide: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/hypervisor/kvm.html The network simply get down and the host could not be accessible through ssh. The settings is as following, for option2, network works but could not register my ISOs to the zone, so which option to take?(NAT already configured on Management server so KVM hypervisor could access the internet) KVM# cat /etc/network/interfaces auto lo iface lo inet loopback ==option 1 auto em1.100 iface em1.100 inet static address 192.168.0.101 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.168.0.100 dns-nameservers 192.168.0.100 ===option 2=== auto em1 iface em1 inet static address 192.168.0.101 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.168.0.100 dns-nameservers 192.168.0.100 auto cloudbr0 ... auto cloudbr1 ... Cheers, Dan
Re: Could not open Management UI after global setting change.
Hi, Jessica, Thanks, turns out to be a firewall problem. Dan 2014-11-05 18:00 GMT-06:00 Jessica Wang jessica.w...@citrix.com: Dan, but still could not open the UI What error did you see in browser window? (If you are using firefox, you can see error in firebug) Jessica -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 3:16 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Could not open Management UI after global setting change. Hi, Jessica, Yes, I used the single quote and get the value updated, but still could not open the UI even after I reboot the server. I remember after I modified this value though the UI this morning, the UI got stuck there and then I could not open it anymore, really strange. Any hints? +--+--+---+---++---+---+-+---++ | category | instance | component | name | value | description | default_value | updated | scope | is_dynamic | +--+--+---+---++---+---+-+---++ | Advanced | DEFAULT | management-server | secstorage.allowed.internal.sites | 192.168.1.0/24 | Comma separated list of cidrs internal to the datacenter that can host template download servers, please note 0.0.0.0 is not a valid site | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | +--+--+---+---++---+---+-+---++ Dan 2014-11-05 16:49 GMT-06:00 Jessica Wang jessica.w...@citrix.com: Dan, You should use single quote instead of double quote like this: update configuration set value='192.168.1.0/24' where name='secstorage.allowed.internal.sites'; Jessica -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 2:41 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Could not open Management UI after global setting change. Thanks Erik, I found it, but when I tried to update it, I got error: mysql update configuration set secstorage.allowed.internal.sites= 192.168.1.0/24; ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'secstorage.allowed.internal.sites=192.168.0.0/24' at line 1 2014-11-05 16:28 GMT-06:00 Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com: On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Experts, When I modified the global settings for secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to a different network parameter, I found I could not open the http://localhost:8080/client UI page anymore, so I could not change back to the original setting again. How to solve this? Where can I find the configuration file path on the Management Ububtu server so I can modify it back by hand? Thanks! The setting should be in your cloud database in the table 'configuration' -- Erik
Could not open Management UI after global setting change.
Hi, Experts, When I modified the global settings for secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to a different network parameter, I found I could not open the http://localhost:8080/client UI page anymore, so I could not change back to the original setting again. How to solve this? Where can I find the configuration file path on the Management Ububtu server so I can modify it back by hand? Thanks! Cheers, Dan
Re: Could not open Management UI after global setting change.
Thanks Erik, I found it, but when I tried to update it, I got error: mysql update configuration set secstorage.allowed.internal.sites= 192.168.1.0/24; ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'secstorage.allowed.internal.sites=192.168.0.0/24' at line 1 2014-11-05 16:28 GMT-06:00 Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com: On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Experts, When I modified the global settings for secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to a different network parameter, I found I could not open the http://localhost:8080/client UI page anymore, so I could not change back to the original setting again. How to solve this? Where can I find the configuration file path on the Management Ububtu server so I can modify it back by hand? Thanks! The setting should be in your cloud database in the table 'configuration' -- Erik
Re: Could not open Management UI after global setting change.
Thanks, the value is updated and restarted cloudstack-management, but still could not open the UI, don't know the reason... 2014-11-05 16:39 GMT-06:00 Jessica Wang jessica.w...@citrix.com: Erik, You can change the value in database: update configuration set value='xxx' where name='secstorage.allowed.internal.sites' Jessica -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 2:28 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Could not open Management UI after global setting change. On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Experts, When I modified the global settings for secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to a different network parameter, I found I could not open the http://localhost:8080/client UI page anymore, so I could not change back to the original setting again. How to solve this? Where can I find the configuration file path on the Management Ububtu server so I can modify it back by hand? Thanks! The setting should be in your cloud database in the table 'configuration' -- Erik
Re: Could not open Management UI after global setting change.
Hi, Jessica, Yes, I used the single quote and get the value updated, but still could not open the UI even after I reboot the server. I remember after I modified this value though the UI this morning, the UI got stuck there and then I could not open it anymore, really strange. Any hints? +--+--+---+---++---+---+-+---++ | category | instance | component | name | value | description | default_value | updated | scope | is_dynamic | +--+--+---+---++---+---+-+---++ | Advanced | DEFAULT | management-server | secstorage.allowed.internal.sites | 192.168.1.0/24 | Comma separated list of cidrs internal to the datacenter that can host template download servers, please note 0.0.0.0 is not a valid site | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | +--+--+---+---++---+---+-+---++ Dan 2014-11-05 16:49 GMT-06:00 Jessica Wang jessica.w...@citrix.com: Dan, You should use single quote instead of double quote like this: update configuration set value='192.168.1.0/24' where name='secstorage.allowed.internal.sites'; Jessica -Original Message- From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 2:41 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Could not open Management UI after global setting change. Thanks Erik, I found it, but when I tried to update it, I got error: mysql update configuration set secstorage.allowed.internal.sites= 192.168.1.0/24; ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'secstorage.allowed.internal.sites=192.168.0.0/24' at line 1 2014-11-05 16:28 GMT-06:00 Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com: On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Experts, When I modified the global settings for secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to a different network parameter, I found I could not open the http://localhost:8080/client UI page anymore, so I could not change back to the original setting again. How to solve this? Where can I find the configuration file path on the Management Ububtu server so I can modify it back by hand? Thanks! The setting should be in your cloud database in the table 'configuration' -- Erik
Could not delete Zone(Cloudstack 4.4)
Hi, When I tried to delete a Zone in the UI, it returns an error as: The zone is not deletable because there are physical networks in this zone. What does this mean and how to delete the Zone? Cheers, Dan
Re: Could not delete Zone(Cloudstack 4.4)
No, I will try to delete it. Thanks Motty. 2014-11-04 10:20 GMT-06:00 motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com: Dan, have you deleted any networks you created? On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, When I tried to delete a Zone in the UI, it returns an error as: The zone is not deletable because there are physical networks in this zone. What does this mean and how to delete the Zone? Cheers, Dan -- Thanks for your support, Motty
Could not find My ISOs(openstack 4.4)
Hi, All, On my ubuntu openstack 4.4, after I registered my iso, the Ready status is No, and when I tried to create an instance from this iso, I just could not see it in the My ISOs tab, do you know what's the possible problem? Thanks a lot! Cheers, Dan
Re: Could not find My ISOs(openstack 4.4)
Forgot to mention that the iso image was downloaded manually and put under secondary storage path on the Management Server(192.168.0.5) as: /mnt/secondary/iso/ubuntu-14.04.1-server-amd64.iso. While in the Add ISO screen, for the URL field, I put http://192.168.0.5/mnt/secondary/iso/ubuntu-14.04.1-server-amd64.iso;. 2014-11-04 15:07 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com: Hi, All, On my ubuntu openstack 4.4, after I registered my iso, the Ready status is No, and when I tried to create an instance from this iso, I just could not see it in the My ISOs tab, do you know what's the possible problem? Thanks a lot! Cheers, Dan
Could not find System VM on the UI.
Hi, Experts, After I installed cloudstack and openned the UI, why I could not see any System VMs(0) under the Infrastructure tab? I could add Zone-Pod-Cluster-Hosts. And the system VM has already been downloaded: ll /mnt/secondary/template/tmpl/1/3/ total 296048 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 3 17:08 ./ drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Nov 3 17:02 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 303139840 Nov 3 17:08 a2c5d738-e8ee-4143-a16d-ca8a550df236.qcow2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 295 Nov 3 17:08 template.properties What's the problem? How to add System VM to the cluster? Thanks! Cheers, Dan
Re: Could not find System VM on the UI.
Yes, the zone is enabled. How to add a system VM? 2014-11-03 17:29 GMT-06:00 abhisek basu abhisekb...@msn.com: Is the zone enabled? CS should create system vms once zone is enabled. Sent from my iPhone On 4 Nov 2014, at 4:56 am, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Experts, After I installed cloudstack and openned the UI, why I could not see any System VMs(0) under the Infrastructure tab? I could add Zone-Pod-Cluster-Hosts. And the system VM has already been downloaded: ll /mnt/secondary/template/tmpl/1/3/ total 296048 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 3 17:08 ./ drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Nov 3 17:02 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 303139840 Nov 3 17:08 a2c5d738-e8ee-4143-a16d-ca8a550df236.qcow2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 295 Nov 3 17:08 template.properties What's the problem? How to add System VM to the cluster? Thanks! Cheers, Dan
Re: Could not find System VM on the UI.
Ok, I will check fir it. By the way, does anybody know how to bring back the initial login page that let one select betwen I have used *CloudStack* before , skip this guide and *Continue with Basic installation* . [Guided tour]? Currently when I login in, this selection page does not appear any more. I would like to try the guided steps to see what happen because the initial try of the guide was interrupted by some reasons. Thanks! Dan 2014-11-04 7:40 GMT+08:00 Sam Ceylani s...@mistercertified.com: on the cs man. server log does it mention anything like zone x ready to launch secondary vm (or console vm) probably it thinks it can not launch thrm for some reason (you can destroy an ssvm but you cant launch it yourself), cs management server log may have the clue about the problem... Sent from my iPhone On Nov 3, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, the zone is enabled. How to add a system VM? 2014-11-03 17:29 GMT-06:00 abhisek basu abhisekb...@msn.com: Is the zone enabled? CS should create system vms once zone is enabled. Sent from my iPhone On 4 Nov 2014, at 4:56 am, Dan Dong dongda...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Experts, After I installed cloudstack and openned the UI, why I could not see any System VMs(0) under the Infrastructure tab? I could add Zone-Pod-Cluster-Hosts. And the system VM has already been downloaded: ll /mnt/secondary/template/tmpl/1/3/ total 296048 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 3 17:08 ./ drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Nov 3 17:02 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 303139840 Nov 3 17:08 a2c5d738-e8ee-4143-a16d-ca8a550df236.qcow2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 295 Nov 3 17:08 template.properties What's the problem? How to add System VM to the cluster? Thanks! Cheers, Dan
RE: VPN for VPC feature in 4.3
I've also encountered the exact same issue. Couldn't Remote Access VPN to
the VPC VR, and thanks to this thread discovered I have no public IP on the
VR (see ifconfig below)
I am also running an upgraded 4.2.1 - 4.3 setup, on KVM hosts. The only
non-standard aspect of my setup is I am using the patched JAR to get around
issue #6464:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6464?focusedCommentId=14008807page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14008807
Andrei are you also using the patched JAR? I suspect this might be the root
cause of the issue, either that or the upgrade bug itself.
---
root@r-115-VM:~# ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 0e:00:a9:fe:00:1d
inet addr:169.254.0.29 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 inet6 addr:
fe80::c00:a9ff:fefe:1d/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST
MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:219 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX
packets:220 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0
txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:33934 (33.1 KiB) TX bytes:38836 (37.9 KiB) lo Link
encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128
Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:2 errors:0
dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:214 (214.0 B) TX bytes:214
(214.0 B)
root@r-115-VM:~#
Hi Praveen,
I was wondering if you've solved this problem that you were having with VPC
not
getting the IP on the public interface?
I've upgraded ACS from 4.2.1 to 4.3.0 and noticed that all my VPCs do not
have
the public IP address assigned to them on eth1. I've followed the upgrade
instructions and I've downloaded the new system vm as well as restarted all
system vms.
My VPCs worked perfectly well on 4.2.1, but they are not working now as VPC
vr
doesn't have a public IP. I've got plenty of free public IPs and I am also
using
kvm.
Thanks for any help
- Original Message -
From: Praveen Buravilli prav...@citrix.com To: use...@
cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 2 April, 2014 12:19:43 PM Subject:
RE: VPN for VPC feature in 4.3
Yes Benoit, I have 40% of free public IPs available. So, that should not be
an
issue.
I don’t see any errors in log file too. Have you noticed any exceptions in
log
files by any chance when you encountered this issue?
Thanks, Praveen Kumar
-Original Message- From: benoit lair [mailto:kuru...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 April 2014 17:30 To: use...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: VPN
for VPC feature in 4.3
Hi Praveen,
I already have this issue with vpc vr : Have you checked if you have some
public ip adresses available on your zone ?
Regards, Benoit.
2014-04-02 12:24 GMT+02:00 Praveen Buravilli prav...@citrix.com:
Thanks Geoff. Actually, eth1 for VPC router is missing.
When I looked at log file, surprisingly a request has been sent to create
router VM with two NICs(one link local and other public) whereas, the
router was created with only one NIC.
Any thoughts? fyi, I'm running CloudStack 4.3 with KVM nodes.
Here attached is log file snippet containing both request and response info
on router start command:
(Highlighted NIC entries in the log with red and green texts).
==
2014-04-02 06:00:47,968 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(Job-Executor-35:ctx-544b3513 ctx-5d9c4b47) Seq 6-1545667825: Sending { Cmd
, MgmtId: 52237010300, via: 6(localhost.localdomain), Ver: v1, Flags:
100111,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand:{vm:{id:43,name:r-43-VM,
type:DomainRouter,cpus:1,minSpeed:500,maxSpeed:500,minRam:1
34217728,maxRam:134217728,arch:x86_64,os:Debian GNU/Linux
7(64-bit),bootArgs: vpccidr=10.201.0.0/16domain=cs7cloud.internal
dns1=8.8.8.8 template=domP name=r-43-VM eth0ip=169.254.1.131
eth0mask=255.255.0.0 type=vpcrouter
disable_rp_filter=true,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:true,limitCp
uUse:false,enableDynamicallyScaleVm:false,vncPassword:21a870dc77
23830,params:{},uuid:05b714cf-a511-42d9-b24a-6d077342865f,disk
s:[{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid
:b61da4e1-121e-4e02-b345-35719deec994,volumeType:ROOT,dataStore
:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO:{uuid:90ff
a1df-e8bd-3e46-893d-bb9b63e0b180,id:2,poolType:NetworkFilesystem
,host:172.20.105.2,path:/export/praveen/csprimary,port:2049
,url:NetworkFilesystem://
172.20.105.2//export/praveen/csprimary/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=90ffa1d
f-e8bd-3e46-893d-bb9b63e0b180
Using IBM powerVM
Hi Has anybody worked with PowerVM in ACS environment? Thanks Dan Crowe ShapeBlue SA Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Using IBM powerVM
Thanks Ilya Yes, that is the case re old mammoth! Changing direction and asking questions though. Dan On 2014/07/08, 5:53 AM, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote: I assume this implies AIX. There were number of threads (including mine) asking about AIX support on CloudStack. As it stands, other than IBM - no other cloud solution has support for it (AFAIK). Regards, ilya PS: AIX is usually run by mammoth shops that started at least 30 years ago - is it the case for you as well? On 7/7/14, 2:21 PM, Dan Crowe wrote: Hi Has anybody worked with PowerVM in ACS environment? Thanks Dan Crowe ShapeBlue SA Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Importing VMDKs
Hey all! Brand new to the list, and looking for a private cloud solution for onsite. In my current office environment I have a pretty large VMware Virtual Centre deployment, and I am looking to DR it to a private cloud that I will be building. Yes I could just duplicate my VMware environment in the second location and use SRM or something like that, but the private cloud solution will have 3 main purposes: 1) DR for my existing VMware environment. 2) Test and Dev for users in the office where the DR site will be hosted. (so brand new... now VMware involved). 3) I would like to save money on my VMware licensing. Now that I have set the stage... I am looking to determine how and what the process is for taking a VMDK from my VMware environment, and importing it to a private cloud. I have been searching if this is possible with cloudstack, and I cant find too much. I would prefer to not have to go through a long import process if at all possible. If this is possible can someone point me to some whitepapers or documentation on how this is done? Thanks! Dan
Re: Cloudstack on VMs
Hi Jitendra, Im running cloudstack management servers and cloudstack database servers as VMs. 2 VM for management and 2 VMs for database. Database VM(s) are HA mysql cluster. Management VM - just behind loadbalancer. Of cause that VMs are not controlled by cloudstack, in my case they are just VMs running under XEN. Hi All, In the last month I had successfully deployed cloudstack 4.0.2 on 2 physical machines (one was VT enabled ubuntu host and other was ubuntu management server ). Can anyone please tell me, whether it possible to deploy cloudstack on 2 virtual machines? Thanks, Jitendra This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
cloudstack usage for non-root domains
Hi All, is there special configuration to enable usage for non root domains ? i don't see any usage statistc other then for root domain. Did the following query: mysql select distinct(domain_id) from cloud_usage; +---+ | domain_id | +---+ | 1 | +---+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) database cloud_usage. Missed to configured something ? Dan This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
CPU overprovisioning.
Hi all, I configured CPU over provisioning factor 2.0 but cloudstack (4.2) shows no changes on the dashboard. computational nodes are XenServer 6.2, 2x4cores. Any hints are more then welcome. Dan. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Re: Scheduled snapshots doesn't work as expected
Nope, it didn't help. Can you please try running the update resource count action for the account and see if that helps ? On 27/11/13 12:24 PM, d...@soleks.com d...@soleks.com wrote: Hi All, For last couple days i was fighting with scheduled snapshot issue. I configured snapshot limit for one of the account as 64. Settings for hourly, daily, weekly and monthly also pretty high (but in sum not more then 64). Account has 2 volumes i scheduled snapshots for. Cloudstack created 8 snapshots (6 hourly and 2 daily) and started to complain that limit for 'snapshot' resources reached. I increased maximum allowed snapshots up to 128, CS said that 'secondary-storage' limit reached (it's configured as 512G). I removed all snapshots for that account, it was reflected on the dashboard, sec storage utilization changed, but still wasn't able to create snapshots for that account. Then i configured 'snapshot' settings for account as -1 and snapshot scheduler started to create snapshots. Does anybody has such problem or i miss-configured something. Dan. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Re: CPU overprovisioning.
That is what i didn't know about. Is it possible to update that settings for existing cluster ? Did you change the global setting or the cluster setting ? In 4.2 changing global setting only affects the newly created clusters factor not the existing ones. On 27/11/13 12:26 PM, d...@soleks.com d...@soleks.com wrote: Hi all, I configured CPU over provisioning factor 2.0 but cloudstack (4.2) shows no changes on the dashboard. computational nodes are XenServer 6.2, 2x4cores. Any hints are more then welcome. Dan. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Re: CPU overprovisioning.
Super !!! Fixed. Thanks for heads-up. That is what i didn't know about. Is it possible to update that settings for existing cluster ? Did you change the global setting or the cluster setting ? In 4.2 changing global setting only affects the newly created clusters factor not the existing ones. On 27/11/13 12:26 PM, d...@soleks.com d...@soleks.com wrote: Hi all, I configured CPU over provisioning factor 2.0 but cloudstack (4.2) shows no changes on the dashboard. computational nodes are XenServer 6.2, 2x4cores. Any hints are more then welcome. Dan. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Re: RE: Changing compute offering needs a restarting to take effect.
Dan Griffith Critical Systems Consulting 980-202-CRIT (980.202.2748) d...@critsyscon.com Twitter https://twitter.com/#!/critsyscon | Google+https://plus.google.com/u/0/110824920679253529613/posts/p/pub| LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/critsyscon On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:18 AM, WXR 1485739...@qq.com wrote: cloudstack4.1,use kvm as hypervisor. -- Original -- From: Geoff Higginbottomgeoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com; Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2013 09:57 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgusers@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: RE: Changing compute offering needs a restarting to take effect. What version of CloudStack, and also what HyperVisor are you using Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: WXR [mailto:1485739...@qq.com] Sent: 02 July 2013 14:49 To: users Subject: Changing compute offering needs a restarting to take effect. When I stop a instance and change its compute offering from one to another(e.g. 1 cpu to 2 cpus),the vm's compute offering will not change to the new one after the first starting.And if I restart the vm again,it will apply the new computer offering. Why? This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
