Re: Dell XPS15 9570
Leander, that seems to be just the ticket! Looks like that's solved the issue at first sniff, but I'll have more time to poke around tomorrow and make sure it's all happy. Thanks again, and I'll post back when I've had more time to run it through its paces. Thomas On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 6:23 PM Leander Hutton wrote: > On 08/21/2018 12:39 AM, Thomas Letherby wrote: > > Doesn't seem to have a monitor section, but this may be because it's a > > laptop so the nVidia and Intel gfx are interconnected, I also don't have > > a 98-monitor.conf file. > > > > Might have something to do with it... > > > > Restarting SDDM on another terminal just gets me the usual black screen. > > > > Installed the latest patches too just in case, no dice there either. > > I ran into the same blank screen bug a while back on KDE spin of Fedora > with a Precision 7720 (Quadro P3000/Intel Graphics). I finally figured > out that adding the following options to /etc/sddm/Xsetup file and > leaving graphics switching on in the BIOS allowed SDDM to start normally > with the nVidia drivers: > > xrandr --setprovideroutputsource modesetting NVIDIA-0 > xrandr --auto > > I haven't seen that suggested yet in the thread, if it has and I've > overlooked it my apologizes. > > Leander > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MNU7N7AJL7X2GSB4DDNZYCUAG64LJ6XU/ > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YFN3S6XM24VSZ42JG4TTOQCYLH4XTASN/
Re: new kernel?
Thanks! I guess that I am just surprised that we have not had a new kernel for a while. We are at 4.17.14 and there is nothing on updates-testing so I was thinking that perhaps we are moving on to 4.18 hence the delay. Best wishes, Ranjan On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 11:22:32 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: > On 08/22/18 11:10, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > Just curious, there has not been a kernel in testing for a while. When is > > the next kernel expected to land in Fedora? I guess that it will be a > > 4.18.3 now perhaps? > > > The latest build in koji for F28 is kernel-4.17.17-200 with the following in > the > changelog > > Fix CVE-2018-15471 (rhbz 1610555 1618414) > > I guess it is more than likely you won't see 4.18.3 until F29. > > -- > Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a > fact. > -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BHRZXKXUGVP6WM7EDPKCKKVUVX53TAKC/
Re: new kernel?
On 08/22/18 11:10, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Just curious, there has not been a kernel in testing for a while. When is the > next kernel expected to land in Fedora? I guess that it will be a 4.18.3 now > perhaps? The latest build in koji for F28 is kernel-4.17.17-200 with the following in the changelog Fix CVE-2018-15471 (rhbz 1610555 1618414) I guess it is more than likely you won't see 4.18.3 until F29. -- Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a fact. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SNKAGGCG6WQDKQ3EZVLTEF26PUQHAVGN/
new kernel?
Just curious, there has not been a kernel in testing for a while. When is the next kernel expected to land in Fedora? I guess that it will be a 4.18.3 now perhaps? -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I63NINSXQTDLGN7CYVK3XXDAZDPPZTNU/
Re: Dell XPS15 9570
On 08/21/2018 12:39 AM, Thomas Letherby wrote: > Doesn't seem to have a monitor section, but this may be because it's a > laptop so the nVidia and Intel gfx are interconnected, I also don't have > a 98-monitor.conf file. > > Might have something to do with it... > > Restarting SDDM on another terminal just gets me the usual black screen. > > Installed the latest patches too just in case, no dice there either. I ran into the same blank screen bug a while back on KDE spin of Fedora with a Precision 7720 (Quadro P3000/Intel Graphics). I finally figured out that adding the following options to /etc/sddm/Xsetup file and leaving graphics switching on in the BIOS allowed SDDM to start normally with the nVidia drivers: xrandr --setprovideroutputsource modesetting NVIDIA-0 xrandr --auto I haven't seen that suggested yet in the thread, if it has and I've overlooked it my apologizes. Leander ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MNU7N7AJL7X2GSB4DDNZYCUAG64LJ6XU/
Re: Device defaults -
On 08/21/2018 05:09 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: I also copy/pasteded the wrong ping results earlier. Firefox normally works from 192.168.1.1. I just want it to configure the device at 192.168.11.1, the default that results from a "hard reset." Then you need to assign yourself an address in the 192.168.11.x range with x != 1. Your IP address has to be different than the device you're trying to connect to. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZHHTEEC5RQ44LSM4GZL274ADRUWC34DS/
Re: Device defaults -
On 08/21/18 19:06, Samuel Sieb wrote: I should have checked before posting. The dev name is required when removing the address as well: ip addr del 192.168.1.10/24 dev eth0 __ Yes it told me when I tried it. dev/ens2p0 is what it wants ... It's feeding time here. I will redo this effort later using "ip addr." I also copy/pasteded the wrong ping results earlier. Firefox normally works from 192.168.1.1. I just want it to configure the device at 192.168.11.1, the default that results from a "hard reset." Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-27/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HO5SUISHVWUWRODZ5Z2JMXFSXR57LOQZ/
Re: Device defaults -
On 08/21/2018 04:04 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 08/21/2018 04:02 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >> Can you ping anything on the 192.168.11/0 network? I don't think you >> have a route for the 192.168.11.0/24 network. While you added an alias >> to your NIC (enp2s0:0) and an IP address for that alias (192.168.11.1), >> you have not added a route for that network so it's using your default >> route (which goes out 192.168.1.1). You'd need to add a route via: > > A route is automatically added for the subnet when you add the address. Ah, that I didn't know. I'm not used to using "ip addr add" that much. Just tested it and yes, it creates a route if you do specify a CIDR less than /32 (in IPV4 parlance at least). -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - Memory is the second thing to go, but I can't remember the first! - -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZKY45ZCJIN53O77UZ24E42XUFGSIREHI/
Re: Device defaults -
On 08/21/2018 04:02 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: Can you ping anything on the 192.168.11/0 network? I don't think you have a route for the 192.168.11.0/24 network. While you added an alias to your NIC (enp2s0:0) and an IP address for that alias (192.168.11.1), you have not added a route for that network so it's using your default route (which goes out 192.168.1.1). You'd need to add a route via: A route is automatically added for the subnet when you add the address. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/33WCUZYXD2LXODARUI4RPIBXA5KQFNRX/
Re: Device defaults -
On 08/21/2018 03:22 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: For the command line, use "ip addr". ip addr add 192.168.1.10/24 dev eth0 ip addr del 192.168.1.10/24 Replace eth0 with the appropriate device name. I should have checked before posting. The dev name is required when removing the address as well: ip addr del 192.168.1.10/24 dev eth0 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ISHMPBQBHIIWORXV4T7KGOJQ4RQS37NN/
Re: Device defaults -
On 08/21/2018 03:29 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > On 08/21/18 10:53, Gary Hodder wrote: >> You can temporarily give your lan interface another class C and >> configure that device to give it a ip in your range. >> Say your device reset to 192.168.0.1 and your ethernet interface is >> eth0 you can >> ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 >> Config device plugged into your switch to your class C then >> ifconfig eth0:0 down >> >> Gary. > + > > I can do: > # ifconfig enp2s0:0 192.168.11.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 > > And it does appear to work: > > # ping -c 3 192.168.1.1 > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.301 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.280 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.310 ms > > --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2062ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.280/0.297/0.310/0.012 ms > > > # ip a shows: > > 2: enp2s0: mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel > state UP group default qlen 1000 > link/ether 4c:cc:6a:62:e9:85 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 192.168.1.10/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global dynamic enp2s0 > valid_lft 80281sec preferred_lft 80281sec > inet 192.168.11.1/24 brd 192.168.11.255 scope global enp2s0:0 > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > inet6 fe80::4323:323b:592f:3d9b/64 scope link > > > However: Firefox can’t establish a connection to the server at > 192.168.11.1 Can you ping anything on the 192.168.11/0 network? I don't think you have a route for the 192.168.11.0/24 network. While you added an alias to your NIC (enp2s0:0) and an IP address for that alias (192.168.11.1), you have not added a route for that network so it's using your default route (which goes out 192.168.1.1). You'd need to add a route via: ip route add 192.168.11.0/24 dev enp2s0:0 to force it. You should also be aware that if the web server you're trying to hit is on THIS machine, simply adding an alias/IP to the NIC and adding a route won't work if that network manipulation was done after the web server was started. The web server typically starts listening on the IP addresses that are up at the time the webserver starts, and you have to make sure it uses something like Apache's "httpd.conf" file: Listen *:80 OR Listen 80 Ngnix's "nginx.conf" file: listen 80; to make sure it listens on port 80 for ALL of the IPs on the machine. You can see which IPs the server is listening on by using: netstat -lpnt OR ss -lpnt and looking at the local address parts of the display. If the local address is "0.0.0.0:", then it's listening on all IPs on the machine. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - "Celibacy is not hereditary." - - -- Guy Goden - -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VVT4KQMB7UHN5YMDBUNUOW6KWZ2KF6OM/
Re: Device defaults -
On 08/21/2018 03:29 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: However: Firefox can’t establish a connection to the server at 192.168.11.1. That's the address you set your computer to. What address is the router at? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OGTWDFC36OUJKFKKDXM3XAQYP7HI3HNY/
Re: Device defaults -
On 08/21/18 10:53, Gary Hodder wrote: You can temporarily give your lan interface another class C and configure that device to give it a ip in your range. Say your device reset to 192.168.0.1 and your ethernet interface is eth0 you can ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 Config device plugged into your switch to your class C then ifconfig eth0:0 down Gary. + I can do: # ifconfig enp2s0:0 192.168.11.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 And it does appear to work: # ping -c 3 192.168.1.1 PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.301 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.280 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.310 ms --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2062ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.280/0.297/0.310/0.012 ms # ip a shows: 2: enp2s0: mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 4c:cc:6a:62:e9:85 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.10/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global dynamic enp2s0 valid_lft 80281sec preferred_lft 80281sec inet 192.168.11.1/24 brd 192.168.11.255 scope global enp2s0:0 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::4323:323b:592f:3d9b/64 scope link However: Firefox can’t establish a connection to the server at 192.168.11.1. What am I missing, what else do I need? Thanks for the help, Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-27/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3SSFJM327KIH7TVGK4ZWNUNFD4JBIR44/
Re: Device defaults -
On 08/21/2018 07:53 AM, Gary Hodder wrote: You can temporarily give your lan interface another class C and configure that device to give it a ip in your range. Say your device reset to 192.168.0.1 and your ethernet interface is eth0 you can ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 Config device plugged into your switch to your class C then ifconfig eth0:0 down ifconfig is deprecated and not installed by default now. The new way is to use "ip addr". I have seen a comment somewhere that the eth0:0 method has some issues as well, but I don't remember the specifics (and I never ran into them myself). ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/E4NB7SBQPIL7GLLCC5NS542N4CGYRZJZ/
Re: Device defaults -
On 08/21/2018 03:12 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: It seems too often I struggle with the problem of dealing with a device that, when "reset" or new, is on a different subnet and my computer address needs to change temporarily for the device to be accessedwith the Firefox browser long enough to change the device address too something in my 192.168.1.xxx range. What is the simplest way to do that with Fedora 27 or 28,NetworkManager? If you want a gui, then install nm-connection-editor. That lets you add extra static addresses to an interface or wifi connection. For the command line, use "ip addr". ip addr add 192.168.1.10/24 dev eth0 ip addr del 192.168.1.10/24 Replace eth0 with the appropriate device name. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/64P5NH2LXLRB3MZNULVDVJPQKRPLOEZB/
Re: Split tunnelling
On 08/21/2018 09:08 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: It works as far as it goes, but still no split tunnel. I suspect the (provider-supplied *binary*) connection script is forcing all traffic through the tunnel. Looks like I'll have to play with OpenVPN using the provider's credentials and see if I can convince it to play ball. What is the output of the "route" command? Check for a default gateway that is pointing to the VPN. If there is one, try removing it and see what happens. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LEHRDI5XSNI35MMQC42DYQSPGCNDVWIC/
Re: Split tunnelling
On 08/21/2018 02:49 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 09:46 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: However, my openvpn connection only routes the private network subnets, everything else goes over the regular network connection. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "private network subnets". You mean it does this automatically, or you configured it that way? openvpn doesn't provide a default gateway unless you put that in the config. So only the routes that I push from the server go through the VPN. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UVURRAIU54V46VS3S35L4Y6WKFAICWLK/
Re: Split tunnelling
On 08/21/2018 04:21 AM, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote: VPN-server processes can push routing info, and DNS-server addresses. AFAICR systems accept three DNS-resolvers. This can be tricky. If the VPN-process pushes three resolvers, the old ones will be gone (while the tunnel exists), Thus you are unable to resolve NON-vpn-URL's. This doesn't work the way you seem to be suggesting. Even if your old DNS servers are still in the list, they won't be used. The DNS resolving system will always use the first one in the list unless it's not reachable. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3ZO43S7ZSNRO5RFJ6VTLENH2RT4DBCH4/
Re: Split tunnelling
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 16:44 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 18:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 08/21/18 17:46, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote: > > > > Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan > > > > ha scritto: > > > > > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling > > > > > is > > > > > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is > > > > > tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through > > > > > normal > > > > > channels. I've tried messing with network namespaces, which would seem > > > > > to be the way to go, but not managed to get everything lined up so > > > > > far. > > > > > All the howto's I've seen are for various flavours of Ubuntu. > > > > > > > > > > I guess I'm asking if anyone has already done the work and feels like > > > > > sharing it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you use NetworkManager, you can check the option "Use this > > > > connection only for resources on its network", in the IPv4 tab of the > > > > VPN settings. > > > > > > I do use NM, but I'm not seeing that option, at least under KDE. I'll > > > look using Gnome just to be sure but it seems unlikely that they would > > > be different. > > > > Under the IPv4 tab, click on Routes. The check box is there in KDE. > > Thanks Ed. It was hiding at the bottom of the window and I needed to > scroll to see it. It works as far as it goes, but still no split tunnel. I suspect the (provider-supplied *binary*) connection script is forcing all traffic through the tunnel. Looks like I'll have to play with OpenVPN using the provider's credentials and see if I can convince it to play ball. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FMHSM2IKKBVHPXC5JVG746QCP5NDPCDM/
Re: Split tunnelling
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 11:21 +, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote: > See comment below. > > -Original Message- > From: Patrick O'Callaghan [mailto:pocallag...@gmail.com] > Sent: dinsdag 21 augustus 2018 11:49 > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Split tunnelling > > On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 09:46 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 08/20/2018 05:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is > > > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is > > > tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through normal > > > channels. I've tried messing with network namespaces, which would seem > > > to be the way to go, but not managed to get everything lined up so far. > > > All the howto's I've seen are for various flavours of Ubuntu. > > > > I don't know about apps, namespaces might work for that but I haven't > > had any reason to try that yet. > > > > However, my openvpn connection only routes the private network subnets, > > everything else goes over the regular network connection. > > I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "private network subnets". > You mean it does this automatically, or you configured it that way? > > > The only > > tricky part, which I haven't tried to solve, is that you can't resolve > > private DNS entries from the VPN connection. This would likely be a > > problem with a work VPN, unless you let the work DNS resolve everything. > > Indeed, that could be an issue. > > Poc > > > = > " To be clear, split tunnelling is > > > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is > > > tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through normal > > > channels." > > No, not exactly. > That is more an example of the use of multiple routes. > Destination-A goes through gateway-A > Destination-B goes through gateway-B > All-else goes through default-gateway... > Either GW-A or GW-B could be VPN. > > Split-tunneling is more that transmit and receive use different tunnels, > Or traffic to SAME destination is load-balanced over multiple, parallel > tunnels. I'm following the terminology used in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split_tunneling, which is also used by my VPN provider (ExpressVPN) and others (e.g. NordVPN). (ExpressVPN actually support split-tunneling, but only for Windows and MacOS.) None of these mention load-balancing or using different tunnels for transmit and receive. Of course it wouldn't be the first time a technical term is overloaded with several meanings. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UBHYQJXU2PYTXEOWEL73WG2PKFLWLCSL/
Re: Split tunnelling
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 18:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 08/21/18 17:46, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote: > > > Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan > > > ha scritto: > > > > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling > > > > is > > > > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is > > > > tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through > > > > normal > > > > channels. I've tried messing with network namespaces, which would seem > > > > to be the way to go, but not managed to get everything lined up so > > > > far. > > > > All the howto's I've seen are for various flavours of Ubuntu. > > > > > > > > I guess I'm asking if anyone has already done the work and feels like > > > > sharing it. > > > > > > > > > > If you use NetworkManager, you can check the option "Use this > > > connection only for resources on its network", in the IPv4 tab of the > > > VPN settings. > > > > I do use NM, but I'm not seeing that option, at least under KDE. I'll > > look using Gnome just to be sure but it seems unlikely that they would > > be different. > > Under the IPv4 tab, click on Routes. The check box is there in KDE. Thanks Ed. It was hiding at the bottom of the window and I needed to scroll to see it. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2Y7S3CNGKJM5ZX7PJKJH3RQ6W5S3MLSD/
Re: Device defaults -
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 06:12 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote: > It seems too often I struggle with the problem of dealing with a > device > that, when "reset" or new, is on a different subnet and my computer > address needs to change temporarily for the device to be > accessedwith > the Firefox browser long enough to change the device address too > something in my 192.168.1.xxx range. > > What is the simplest way to do that with Fedora 27 or > 28,NetworkManager? > > My immediate problem is that I have an Buffalo router /have been > using > as an ethernet bridge for a long time and I forgot the address I > assigned to it and I can't access it. It came with dd-wrt. I t > looks > to me like I need to reset it to gain access with the browser. > > /Bob > You can temporarily give your lan interface another class C and configure that device to give it a ip in your range. Say your device reset to 192.168.0.1 and your ethernet interface is eth0 you can ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 Config device plugged into your switch to your class C then ifconfig eth0:0 down Gary. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/K6IQE7VAKLHFUQHPNWRFCR4FZT6E4CMT/
[389-users] Re: Having problem setting a read only replica (different database generation ID)
Since it caused 100% CPU in the master server, I had already opened a case: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49915 Thanks. ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TCRFL6NAZTXPZNYETG5RRLE6YQT4YAA7/
Re: F28 Parole needs H.264 (High Profile) Decoder
On 08/21/2018 09:59 AM, stan wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 07:59:07 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have an iPhone .mov quick time video I need to play for my wife. I get this message from Parole. When I click on install, nothing seems to happen. How do I get this decoder installed? Meanwhile, VLC will play the audio, but the video stays on the first frame. What's with that? Or maybe some other app is better? For parole, you could try installing the ffmpeg from rpmfusion to get the decoder libraries for h264 installed. It probably uses them. .mov is h264? .mov is the old mpeg standard extension, now completely off patent, yay! What does file say about the file?For what it's worth, parole played both mp4 (h264) and mov files on my system. The video is from my father-in-law's iPhone (I do not know what version) of my 14yr old nephew playing his guitar at an old folk's home. Installing ffmpeg did not help out parole. It is still reporting to install the decoder. But I had mplayer and ran with that and that worked. Here is the interesting messages from the terminal window: MPlayer SVN-r38113-8 (C) 2000-2018 MPlayer Team do_connect: could not connect to socket connect: No such file or directory Failed to open LIRC support. You will not be able to use your remote control. Playing /home/rgm/Videos/BenyominMoshe/IMG_0723.MOV. libavformat version 58.12.100 (external) libavformat file format detected. [mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2 @ 0x7f3cf5431660]Protocol name not provided, cannot determine if input is local or a network protocol, buffers and access patterns cannot be configured optimally without knowing the protocol [lavf] stream 0: video (h264), -vid 0 [lavf] stream 1: audio (aac), -aid 0, -alang und VIDEO: [H264] 1920x1080 24bpp 29.970 fps 11268.2 kbps (1375.5 kbyte/s) Failed to open VDPAU backend libvdpau_r600.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [vdpau] Error when calling vdp_device_create_x11: 1 == Opening video decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg's libavcodec codec family libavcodec version 58.18.100 (external) Selected video codec: [ffh264] vfm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg H.264) == Clip info: major_brand: qt minor_version: 0 compatible_brands: qt creation_time: 2018-07-05T19:47:28.00Z com.apple.quicktime.location.ISO6709: +42.5123-083.2824+217.055/ com.apple.quicktime.make: Apple com.apple.quicktime.model: iPhone 5s com.apple.quicktime.software: 11.4 com.apple.quicktime.creationdate: 2018-07-05T15:47:28-0400 Load subtitles in /home/rgm/Videos/BenyominMoshe/ == Opening audio decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg/libavcodec audio decoders AUDIO: 44100 Hz, 1 ch, floatle, 62.6 kbit/4.44% (ratio: 7831->176400) Selected audio codec: [ffaac] afm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg AAC (MPEG-2/MPEG-4 Audio)) == AO: [pulse] 44100Hz 1ch floatle (4 bytes per sample) Starting playback... Movie-Aspect is undefined - no prescaling applied. VO: [xv] 1920x1080 => 1920x1080 Planar YV12 [ASPECT] Warning: No suitable new res found! [ASPECT] Warning: No suitable new res found! A: 6.0 V: 1.7 A-V: 4.324 ct: 0.003 0/ 0 294% 44% 52.6% 50 0 Your system is too SLOW to play this! Possible reasons, problems, workarounds: - Most common: broken/buggy _audio_ driver - Try -ao sdl or use the OSS emulation of ALSA. - Experiment with different values for -autosync, 30 is a good start. - Slow video output - Try a different -vo driver (-vo help for a list) or try -framedrop! - Slow CPU - Don't try to play a big DVD/DivX on a slow CPU! Try some of the lavdopts, e.g. -vfm ffmpeg -lavdopts lowres=1:fast:skiploopfilter=all. - Broken file - Try various combinations of -nobps -ni -forceidx -mc 0. - Slow media (NFS/SMB mounts, DVD, VCD etc) - Try -cache 8192. - Are you using -cache to play a non-interleaved AVI file? - Try -nocache. Read DOCS/HTML/en/video.html for tuning/speedup tips. If none of this helps you, read DOCS/HTML/en/bugreports.html. A: 30.5 V: 9.4 A-V: 21.032 ct: 0.001 0/ 0 265% 23% 42.5% 283 0 Exiting... (Quit) I know that the mplayer from rpmfusion has h264 support built in, and also mpg support for the original .mov. Both vlc and mplayer use ffmpeg under the covers, so you could just try ffplay. It's not as sophisticated as mplayer or vlc, but it usually deals well with misconfigured videos, which is what I suspect you have. I sometimes see videos like that, the creator forgot to set some default that is expected, and if the player doesn't have an internal default built in to deal with that, it fails. If the video isn't sensitive, you could
Re: F28 Parole needs H.264 (High Profile) Decoder
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 07:59:07 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I have an iPhone .mov quick time video I need to play for my wife. I > get this message from Parole. When I click on install, nothing seems > to happen. > > How do I get this decoder installed? > > Meanwhile, VLC will play the audio, but the video stays on the first > frame. What's with that? > > Or maybe some other app is better? For parole, you could try installing the ffmpeg from rpmfusion to get the decoder libraries for h264 installed. It probably uses them. .mov is h264? .mov is the old mpeg standard extension, now completely off patent, yay! What does file say about the file?For what it's worth, parole played both mp4 (h264) and mov files on my system. I know that the mplayer from rpmfusion has h264 support built in, and also mpg support for the original .mov. Both vlc and mplayer use ffmpeg under the covers, so you could just try ffplay. It's not as sophisticated as mplayer or vlc, but it usually deals well with misconfigured videos, which is what I suspect you have. I sometimes see videos like that, the creator forgot to set some default that is expected, and if the player doesn't have an internal default built in to deal with that, it fails. If the video isn't sensitive, you could paste it somewhere, and post a link, to see if someone else can play it. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YMX2YANFLR7USEXJU7XCWJG7HNIIBDLL/
Re: video + kodi users/geeks around? - HW decoding 1080p/4K ?
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:13:31 +0100 lejeczek via users wrote: > I wonder - and for any experts this is probably trivial - and I > understand it varies with hardware, but in theory, if hardware > capabilities are fully implemented - should HW acceleration(playback) > that works on 1080p for h264/vc1, also work for 4K? Not an expert, but 4k has 4 times as many pixels as 1080p. That means the graphics hardware has to do 4 times the work to decode those pixels. Sometimes, it will be able to, but I think that sometimes it won't. So, I think your conclusion is not always true. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UMFFKXUDWWGTQC2QFBOWPMG5XBFPO7IL/
[389-users] Re: dirsrv becomes completely unresponsible
Hi Rob, thanks for answer. Am 21.08.2018 um 14:05 schrieb Rob Crittenden: > Jan Kowalsky wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> we still struggeling with multiple problems in our 389-ds setup. >> >> I already opened the threads "disk i/o: very high write rates" and >> "ldapsearch performance problem". >> >> Another (the biggest) problem is, that dirsrv becomes suddenly totally >> unresponsive. The server is still running, no errors in error-log - but >> ldap queries are not answered and run in timeouts. >> >> The only way is to restart it. After restart everything is fine - for a >> while. But sometimes it hangs immediately again after restart. >> >> I logged a straces while dirsrv was unresponsive: >> https://nextcloud.datenkollektiv.net/s/qD8ojQZztMqbQtp > > You want to follow these instructions and file a bug with the output, > https://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/FAQ/faq.html#debugging-hangs Unfortunately debugging with gdb and pstack doesn't work in my environment (Debian Jessie The debugging symbols are installed - but something seems to be wrong: gdb -ex 'set confirm off' -ex 'set pagination off' -ex 'thread apply all bt full' -ex 'quit' /usr/sbin/ns-slapd `pidof ns-slapd` Thread 207 (Thread 0x7f2eb4f51700 (LWP 25429)): #0 0x7f2f661d7893 in select () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. dpkg -l|grep 389-ds ii 389-ds1.3.3.5-4+deb8u1 all 389 Directory Server suite - metapackage ii 389-ds-base 1.3.3.5-4+deb8u1 amd64389 Directory Server suite - server ii 389-ds-base-dbg 1.3.3.5-4+deb8u1 amd64389 Directory Server suite - server debugging symbols ii 389-ds-base-libs 1.3.3.5-4+deb8u1 amd64389 Directory Server suite - libraries ii 389-ds-base-libs-dbg 1.3.3.5-4+deb8u1 amd64389 Directory Server suite - library debugging symbols ii 389-ds-console1.2.7-1 all 389 Directory Server Management Console ii 389-dsgw 1.1.11-1 amd64389 Directory Server Gateway I'll try to update to stretch - maybe the dgb packages in jessie are buggy. Or any other idea? Thanks Jan ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HXMKYDOHBPUUYTYYOU3Q5BGNW5BBFOV7/
[389-users] Re: dirsrv becomes completely unresponsible
Jan Kowalsky wrote: > Hi all, > > we still struggeling with multiple problems in our 389-ds setup. > > I already opened the threads "disk i/o: very high write rates" and > "ldapsearch performance problem". > > Another (the biggest) problem is, that dirsrv becomes suddenly totally > unresponsive. The server is still running, no errors in error-log - but > ldap queries are not answered and run in timeouts. > > The only way is to restart it. After restart everything is fine - for a > while. But sometimes it hangs immediately again after restart. > > I logged a straces while dirsrv was unresponsive: > https://nextcloud.datenkollektiv.net/s/qD8ojQZztMqbQtp You want to follow these instructions and file a bug with the output, https://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/FAQ/faq.html#debugging-hangs rob ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SLTRCOS4YGCQ3EF3WUS4SNBUMHAZZ6Y3/
F28 Parole needs H.264 (High Profile) Decoder
I have an iPhone .mov quick time video I need to play for my wife. I get this message from Parole. When I click on install, nothing seems to happen. How do I get this decoder installed? Meanwhile, VLC will play the audio, but the video stays on the first frame. What's with that? Or maybe some other app is better? thanks ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4NVLJ2BUIM7H67HDJXF45GWAYAQ5KXU3/
RE: Split tunnelling
See comment below. -Original Message- From: Patrick O'Callaghan [mailto:pocallag...@gmail.com] Sent: dinsdag 21 augustus 2018 11:49 To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Split tunnelling On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 09:46 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 08/20/2018 05:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is > > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is > > tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through normal > > channels. I've tried messing with network namespaces, which would seem > > to be the way to go, but not managed to get everything lined up so far. > > All the howto's I've seen are for various flavours of Ubuntu. > > I don't know about apps, namespaces might work for that but I haven't > had any reason to try that yet. > > However, my openvpn connection only routes the private network subnets, > everything else goes over the regular network connection. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "private network subnets". You mean it does this automatically, or you configured it that way? > The only > tricky part, which I haven't tried to solve, is that you can't resolve > private DNS entries from the VPN connection. This would likely be a > problem with a work VPN, unless you let the work DNS resolve everything. Indeed, that could be an issue. Poc = " To be clear, split tunnelling is > > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is > > tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through normal > > channels." No, not exactly. That is more an example of the use of multiple routes. Destination-A goes through gateway-A Destination-B goes through gateway-B All-else goes through default-gateway... Either GW-A or GW-B could be VPN. Split-tunneling is more that transmit and receive use different tunnels, Or traffic to SAME destination is load-balanced over multiple, parallel tunnels. "> tricky part, which I haven't tried to solve, is that you can't resolve > private DNS entries from the VPN connection." VPN-server processes can push routing info, and DNS-server addresses. AFAICR systems accept three DNS-resolvers. This can be tricky. If the VPN-process pushes three resolvers, the old ones will be gone (while the tunnel exists), Thus you are unable to resolve NON-vpn-URL's. Situation can get even more complicated, when using split-horizon DNS. Same URL with internally, and externally different IP-addresses. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IWARJZCPHY6Y6USNYS6Z7HJS72Q63LED/ Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten. This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5QHFXVZ5ZI6J6NBR4YQYEZVVK2NC544Z/
Re: Split tunnelling
On 08/21/18 17:46, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote: >> Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan >> ha scritto: >>> Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling >>> is >>> when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is >>> tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through >>> normal >>> channels. I've tried messing with network namespaces, which would seem >>> to be the way to go, but not managed to get everything lined up so >>> far. >>> All the howto's I've seen are for various flavours of Ubuntu. >>> >>> I guess I'm asking if anyone has already done the work and feels like >>> sharing it. >>> >> If you use NetworkManager, you can check the option "Use this >> connection only for resources on its network", in the IPv4 tab of the >> VPN settings. > I do use NM, but I'm not seeing that option, at least under KDE. I'll > look using Gnome just to be sure but it seems unlikely that they would > be different. Under the IPv4 tab, click on Routes. The check box is there in KDE. -- Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a fact. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5H3CO62C3YVGNYEIZ2LXJYDUOFK6CMCT/
[389-users] dirsrv becomes completely unresponsible
Hi all, we still struggeling with multiple problems in our 389-ds setup. I already opened the threads "disk i/o: very high write rates" and "ldapsearch performance problem". Another (the biggest) problem is, that dirsrv becomes suddenly totally unresponsive. The server is still running, no errors in error-log - but ldap queries are not answered and run in timeouts. The only way is to restart it. After restart everything is fine - for a while. But sometimes it hangs immediately again after restart. I logged a straces while dirsrv was unresponsive: https://nextcloud.datenkollektiv.net/s/qD8ojQZztMqbQtp Maybe someone has an idea? Thanks and regards. Jan ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GVPVQT4CT4VZD6F7YAKFJDFNS2PWGCVF/
Re: Device defaults -
Bob Goodwin writes: > It seems too often I struggle with the problem of dealing with a > device that, when "reset" or new, is on a different subnet and my > computer address needs to change temporarily for the device to be > accessedwith the Firefox browser long enough to change the device > address too something in my 192.168.1.xxx range. > > What is the simplest way to do that with Fedora 27 or > 28,NetworkManager? I can modify the ip4 addresses of my F28 with nmcli; first adds, second removes: nmcli connection modify --temporary +ipv4.address 192.168.1.1/24 nmcli connection modify --temporary -ipv4.address 192.168.1.1/24 It seems possible to have multiple addresses, but I don't know what that means. To see the effect, run nmcli connection show Jarmo ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4CCY6RLGUBP2XKGWZHWQUVNYO4BJXBVI/
Device defaults -
It seems too often I struggle with the problem of dealing with a device that, when "reset" or new, is on a different subnet and my computer address needs to change temporarily for the device to be accessedwith the Firefox browser long enough to change the device address too something in my 192.168.1.xxx range. What is the simplest way to do that with Fedora 27 or 28,NetworkManager? My immediate problem is that I have an Buffalo router /have been using as an ethernet bridge for a long time and I forgot the address I assigned to it and I can't access it. It came with dd-wrt. I t looks to me like I need to reset it to gain access with the browser. /Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-27/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/X2OWCOTI43GC6EABXUUNBWBAH4FZAAAS/
[389-users] Re: Having problem setting a read only replica (different database generation ID)
This caused 100% cpu in the ns-slapd in the master server..
I tried to get a system core file but the server crashed during the process..
Currently I only have this info:
# strace -f -p 59308
strace: Process 59308 attached with 45 threads
[pid 59876] select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 270564}
[pid 59355] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 262, NULL
[pid 59354] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 280, NULL
[pid 59353] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 260, NULL
[pid 59352] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 272, NULL
[pid 59351] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 258, NULL
[pid 59350] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 276, NULL
[pid 59349] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 264, NULL
[pid 59348] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 278, NULL
[pid 59347] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 266, NULL
[pid 59346] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 282, NULL
[pid 59345] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 274, NULL
[pid 59344] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 284, NULL
[pid 59343] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 269, NULL
[pid 59342] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 288, NULL
[pid 59341] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 270, NULL
[pid 59340] futex(0x55fbedc8d08c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 286, NULL
[pid 59339] restart_syscall(<... resuming interrupted futex ...>
[pid 59338] restart_syscall(<... resuming interrupted futex ...>
[pid 59337] futex(0x55fbedc4500c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 1, NULL
[pid 59336] restart_syscall(<... resuming interrupted futex ...>
[pid 59335] futex(0x55fbedc45e0c, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 1, NULL
[pid 59333] select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 236980}
[pid 59332] select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 199957}
[pid 59331] select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {1, 524631}
[pid 59330] select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 66126}
[pid 59325] epoll_wait(12,
[pid 59324] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 16, NULL
[pid 59323] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 15, NULL
[pid 59322] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 14, NULL
[pid 59321] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 13, NULL
[pid 59320] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 12, NULL
[pid 59319] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 11, NULL
[pid 59318] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 10, NULL
[pid 59317] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 9, NULL
[pid 59316] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 8, NULL
[pid 59315] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 7, NULL
[pid 59314] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 6, NULL
[pid 59313] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 4, NULL
[pid 59312] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 3, NULL
[pid 59311] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 1, NULL
[pid 59310] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 5, NULL
[pid 59309] futex(0x55fbecf740dc, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 2, NULL
[pid 59308] futex(0x7f8263ba79d0, FUTEX_WAIT, 59309, NULL
[pid 59355] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59354] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59353] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59352] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59351] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59350] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59349] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59348] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59347] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59346] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59345] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59344] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59343] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59341] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59340] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59323] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59322] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59321] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59320] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59319] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59318] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59317] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
[pid 59316] <... futex resumed> ) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
Re: Split tunnelling
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 09:46 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 08/20/2018 05:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is > > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is > > tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through normal > > channels. I've tried messing with network namespaces, which would seem > > to be the way to go, but not managed to get everything lined up so far. > > All the howto's I've seen are for various flavours of Ubuntu. > > I don't know about apps, namespaces might work for that but I haven't > had any reason to try that yet. > > However, my openvpn connection only routes the private network subnets, > everything else goes over the regular network connection. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "private network subnets". You mean it does this automatically, or you configured it that way? > The only > tricky part, which I haven't tried to solve, is that you can't resolve > private DNS entries from the VPN connection. This would likely be a > problem with a work VPN, unless you let the work DNS resolve everything. Indeed, that could be an issue. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IWARJZCPHY6Y6USNYS6Z7HJS72Q63LED/
Re: Split tunnelling
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote: > > Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan > ha scritto: > > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling > > is > > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is > > tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through > > normal > > channels. I've tried messing with network namespaces, which would seem > > to be the way to go, but not managed to get everything lined up so > > far. > > All the howto's I've seen are for various flavours of Ubuntu. > > > > I guess I'm asking if anyone has already done the work and feels like > > sharing it. > > > > If you use NetworkManager, you can check the option "Use this > connection only for resources on its network", in the IPv4 tab of the > VPN settings. I do use NM, but I'm not seeing that option, at least under KDE. I'll look using Gnome just to be sure but it seems unlikely that they would be different. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QHXDRDOUKOCQXA6JFN4SKARLTT44FUMT/
[389-users] Re: Having problem setting a read only replica (different database generation ID)
I had trigger the replication to 'start' in nsds5BeginReplicaRefresh. The process is going but it looks it is very very slow or no progress in the slave. Log from the slave (slapd-cms1b): [21/Aug/2018:17:08:58.673218882 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Foreman is done; waiting for workers to finish... [21/Aug/2018:17:08:58.676800793 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Workers finished; cleaning up... [21/Aug/2018:17:08:58.879733667 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Workers cleaned up. [21/Aug/2018:17:08:58.881810402 +0800] - INFO - import_sweep_after_pass - import userRoot: Sweeping files for merging later... [21/Aug/2018:17:08:58.887275891 +0800] - INFO - dblayer_instance_start - Import is running with nsslapd-db-private-import-mem on; No other process is allowed to access the database [21/Aug/2018:17:08:58.889966781 +0800] - INFO - import_sweep_after_pass - import userRoot: Sweep done. [21/Aug/2018:17:08:58.892078792 +0800] - INFO - import_main_offline - import userRoot: Beginning pass number 4 [21/Aug/2018:17:09:19.029942409 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 204522252.1/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:09:39.143697939 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 104755299.9/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:09:59.234026992 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 70409299.9/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:10:19.354478812 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 53024287.6/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:10:39.459386459 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 42524428.7/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:10:59.545906420 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 35495597.5/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:11:19.681091120 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 30460761.0/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:11:39.788307824 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 26676815.5/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:11:59.897818165 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 23729101.1/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:12:20.009028611 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 21262214.3/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:12:40.125431830 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 19346699.5/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:13:00.242363842 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 17747798.7/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:13:20.349378012 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 16393004.9/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:13:40.455908420 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 15230380.5/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:14:00.683563806 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Processed 1 entries (pass 4) -- average rate 14221746.0/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec, hit ratio 0% [21/Aug/2018:17:14:00.688258232 +0800] - INFO - import_throw_in_towel - import userRoot: Decided to end this pass because the progress rate has dropped below the 50% threshold. [21/Aug/2018:17:14:00.689364701 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Ending pass number 4 ... [21/Aug/2018:17:14:00.892358046 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Foreman is done; waiting for workers to finish... [21/Aug/2018:17:14:00.897700933 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Workers finished; cleaning up... [21/Aug/2018:17:14:01.101360448 +0800] - INFO - import_monitor_threads - import userRoot: Workers cleaned up. [21/Aug/2018:17:14:01.102663169 +0800] - INFO - import_sweep_after_pass - import userRoot: Sweeping files for merging later... [21/Aug/2018:17:14:01.108310968 +0800] - INFO - dblayer_instance_start - Import is running with nsslapd-db-private-import-mem on; No other process is allowed to access the database [21/Aug/2018:17:14:01.110407720 +0800] - INFO - import_sweep_after_pass - import userRoot: Sweep done.
[389-users] Having problem setting a read only replica (different database generation ID)
Hello, I had an DS instance with data. I had problem setting a read only replica. The master server can connect to the slave but it had problem initialize the slave. I had tried to use the same method to create another slave instance in the master server (using a different port) Replication does not start. The error message is the same. For both cases, the slave instances are brand new, it is empty without any data. slapd-cms1 (master) [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.362357876 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - repl5_inc_run - agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389): State: backoff -> backoff [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.367449793 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn_connect - agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389) - Trying non-secure slapi_ldap_init_ext [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.369104649 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn_connect - agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389) - binddn = cn=replicator,cn=config, passwd = [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.372538122 +0800] - INFO - NSMMReplicationPlugin - bind_and_check_pwp - agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389): Replication bind with SIMPLE auth resumed [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.374333105 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn_cancel_linger - agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389) - No linger to cancel on the connection [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.378484502 +0800] - DEBUG - _csngen_adjust_local_time - gen state before 5b7bc8c70001:1534838983:0:0 [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.379573648 +0800] - DEBUG - _csngen_adjust_local_time - gen state after 5b7bc960:1534839136:0:0 [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.398745479 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - acquire_replica - agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389): Replica was successfully acquired. [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.399914497 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - repl5_inc_run - agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389): State: backoff -> sending_updates [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.402441965 +0800] - WARN - NSMMReplicationPlugin - repl5_inc_run - agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389): The remote replica has a different database generation ID than the local database. You may have to reinitialize the remote replica, or the local replica. [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.412642556 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - release_replica - agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389): Successfully released consumer [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.413664186 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn_start_linger -agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389) - Beginning linger on the connection [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.416302958 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - repl5_inc_run - agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389): State: sending_updates -> start_backoff [21/Aug/2018:16:12:19.418319466 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - repl5_inc_run - agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389): State: start_backoff -> backoff [21/Aug/2018:16:12:19.419789083 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - repl5_inc_run - agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389): State: backoff -> wait_for_changes [21/Aug/2018:16:12:45.421513358 +0800] - DEBUG - replication - multimaster_mmr_postop - error 0 for oparation 561. [21/Aug/2018:16:13:15.436245528 +0800] - DEBUG - replication - multimaster_mmr_postop - error 0 for oparation 561. [21/Aug/2018:16:13:16.437671170 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - linger_timeout - agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389) - Linger timeout has expired on the connection [21/Aug/2018:16:13:16.438990759 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - close_connection_internal - agmt="cn=Replication Agreement cms1 to cms1b" (cms1:2389) - Disconnected from the consumer slapd-cms1b (slave) [21/Aug/2018:16:11:48.532245798 +0800] - INFO - slapd_daemon - slapd started. Listening on All Interfaces port 2389 for LDAP requests [21/Aug/2018:16:11:48.534478125 +0800] - INFO - slapd_daemon - Listening on /var/run/slapd-cms1b.socket for LDAPI requests [21/Aug/2018:16:11:50.617214069 +0800] - DEBUG - replication - multimaster_mmr_postop - error 0 for oparation 561. [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.383019206 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - consumer_connection_extension_acquire_exclusive_access - conn=1 op=3 Acquired consumer connection extension [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.385344779 +0800] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - multimaster_extop_StartNSDS50ReplicationRequest - conn=1 op=3 repl="dc=local,dc=nonet": Begin incremental protocol [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.387493146 +0800] - DEBUG - csngen_adjust_time - gen state before 5b7bc9440001:1534839108:0:0 [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.388905774 +0800] - DEBUG - _csngen_adjust_local_time - gen state before 5b7bc9440001:1534839108:0:0 [21/Aug/2018:16:12:16.390557696 +0800] - DEBUG - _csngen_adjust_local_time - gen state after
Re: Split tunnelling
Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan ha scritto: Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through normal channels. I've tried messing with network namespaces, which would seem to be the way to go, but not managed to get everything lined up so far. All the howto's I've seen are for various flavours of Ubuntu. I guess I'm asking if anyone has already done the work and feels like sharing it. If you use NetworkManager, you can check the option "Use this connection only for resources on its network", in the IPv4 tab of the VPN settings. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/T5HKZHNFBESQCFGIGVAD452WTDZ7M3PH/
Re: plymouth vs. boot messages
Beartooth writes: Does taking out "rhgb" from the boot command line do what you want? >>> >>> It doesn't seem to. >> >> Try removing "rhgb" and "quiet". The following Ansible rule [...] > > Still no joy on either non-GUI PC That is weird. > I don't have Ansible installed (and from the Wikipedia article, it > seems way over my head). Ansible is there only to automate things, it does not change the end result. Simply described, my process is 1. remove kernel parameters rhgb and quiet from /etc/default/grub 2. run /usr/sbin/grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg But if you already tried removing these parameters "by hand," this probably does not help. All the best, Jarmo ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/T4HBAFXHRZIORS3IUTSE6OTCJTIKKKQI/
Re: Dell XPS15 9570
On 08/21/18 12:39, Thomas Letherby wrote: > Tim - I don't believe so, it's a 4K screen so there shouldn't be much it can't > display, and previewing the theme seems to work ok. > > Tried installing Haveged suggested in the Ubuntu bug report, but no dice. That > seems to be mostly people using Gnome, but it's interesting they're seeing > the same > issue. > > My X config as created by the nVidia settings: What appears below is *NOT* an X config file! It is the settings for the "nvidia-settings" Utility! You went to the last line on the left hand side of the Utility which reads "nvidia-settings Configuration" and not the second line on the Utility which reads "X Server Display Configuration"!! > > # > # /home/testuser/nvidia-settings-rc > # > # Configuration file for nvidia-settings - the NVIDIA X Server Settings > utility > # Generated on Mon Aug 20 21:29:02 2018 > # > > # ConfigProperties: > > RcFileLocale = C > DisplayStatusBar = Yes > SliderTextEntries = Yes > IncludeDisplayNameInConfigFile = Yes > ShowQuitDialog = Yes > UpdateRulesOnProfileNameChange = Yes > Timer = Memory_Used_(GPU_0),Yes,3000 > Timer = Thermal_Monitor_(GPU_0),Yes,1000 > Timer = PowerMizer_Monitor_(GPU_0),Yes,1000 > > # Attributes: > > testlaptop.test.domail:1.0/LogAniso=0 > testlaptop.test.domail:1.0/FSAA=0 > testlaptop.test.domail:1.0/TextureClamping=1 > testlaptop.test.domail:1.0/FXAA=0 > testlaptop.test.domail:1.0/FSAAAppControlled=1 > testlaptop.test.domail:1.0/LogAnisoAppControlled=1 > testlaptop.test.domail:1.0/OpenGLImageSettings=1 > testlaptop.test.domail:1.0/FSAAAppEnhanced=0 > > Doesn't seem to have a monitor section, but this may be because it's a laptop > so > the nVidia and Intel gfx are interconnected, I also don't have a > 98-monitor.conf file. That is because it isn't what I've asked of you. And, I thought my instructions and examples were clear, but you are *creating* a 98-monitor.conf. -- Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a fact. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/62AE6OECCRLBHVXPJETFWWJNQ5Y6334O/
