Re: Stateless link usage
there are two ways to do it: a) use a bookmarkablepagelink to go to the cart page and pass in the itemid+quantity to be added. this means that the cart page is responsible for adding the item to the cart. b) use a stateless link to add the item to cart, then setResponsePage(CartPage.class) == to a class not an instance to maintain a clean url with a redirect. -igor On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Ritz123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add To Cart links are on the product list page. I want the links to take the users to view cart page where they can see the cart content. igor.vaynberg wrote: so you want it to add something to cart, and then go where? to the same page? to the cart page? -igor On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Ritz123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually I want to add the product to the cart and not go to the detail page. They both are similar operation in a way, but there is one major difference. View Product has dedicated functionality of just viewing the product and nothing more, but View Cart page will be overloaded with add to cart functionality if I am understanding your point correctly. This actually brings up interesting design question with Wicket, what would be the best way to handle these kind of scenarios? In struts world, I had CartAction - which took care of all the operations (Add, View, Update and Delete) for Cart, what would be the equivalent design in Wicket? All the books and available material covers more of syntactic part of Wicket - but none covers the design - that I have found. I may be missing something and will appreciate any pointers. igor.vaynberg wrote: that's what stateless kinks do. If you want to go t a detail page use a bookmarkable link, not a stateles one. -igor On 5/6/08, Ritz123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a page containing bunch of products and addToCart link next to each product. On clicking the add to cart link, would like to add product to cart. I had Link and onClick() to do this - but recently encountered page expired message which is expected since the page becomes stateful due to the Link. Obviously this page is supposed to be stateless and hence I changed Link to StatelessLink using final product id inside the onclick. Now on application reload(due to hotdeploy) to simulate session expiry, dont get session expired message but link behaves weird in the sense, it seems to be reloading the contained page instead of going to the setResponsePage. Seems like I may be missing something. Is this the right approach in terms of making the page stateless? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stateless-link-usage-tp17093682p17093682.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stateless-link-usage-tp17093682p17108713.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stateless-link-usage-tp17093682p17120171.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket javascripts - reloading every one hour
But is it then really downloaded? Because the brower makes first a head request to it and that will say not changed On 5/8/08, Stefan Simik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi boys, I think, there is one problem with wicket ajax javascripts - there are reloading by browser every hour, because the Expire header is hardcoded to 3600 seconds in WebResource#setHeaders() method. It is really needed to repeatedly once an hour download these wicket javascripts ? These are static wicket javascripts, they are not subject of changes, so why could they not be cached for longer time, for example - 1 week, or longer. It would be better, if caching time should be configurable from some application settings. Could I create requet for improvement, or it is all ok ? thx Stefan Simik // I have consulted this before, but without result. So now, I am trying to show the problem in a simpler situation. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-javascripts---reloading-every-one-hour-tp17117009p17117009.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: behavior for onComponentTagBody
Or use a converter? Because it seems that is what you are doing?
On 5/7/08, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have this in several components:
@Override
protected void onComponentTagBody(MarkupStream markupStream,
ComponentTag openTag) {
String value;
if (getModel() != null) {
value = getModelValue();
} else {
value = ;
}
replaceComponentTagBody(markupStream, openTag,
Consts.getTableBody(getMarkupId(),
value));
}
I want to put it in one location such as in an AbstractBehavior.
Unfortunately, this behavior doesn't have this (or something like this)
method.
Is there a way for creating a behavior for the onComponentTagBody or
replaceComponentTagBody?
thanks
--
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A question about partial form updates with AJAX
Can you show us some code? This should work as long as the component models are updated. Maurice On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:22 AM, nate roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a form with several items. About half of the form is wrapped in a named div attached to a WebMarkupContainer. When a drop-down value changes, the div is updated via AJAX, re-rendering that part of the form. However, the components in that part of the form are not updated and so this re-rendering causes their values to revert to the initial value. I've used an AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior to accomplish the AJAX update. Is there a more appropriate behavior that I should use? When I use no AJAX, then the form maintains its values rather than resetting (but the whole page is refreshed.) How can I prevent a form reset? Thanks, Nate Roe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: behavior for onComponentTagBody
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: doesnt Label do this already? Yeah, I think just using getModelValueAsString would give the same results. Also, Label is the only (or one of the few at most) class(es) where overriding onComponentTagBody makes sense. Why not do your thing in a base class Eyal? Or... make model wrappers, where the sole purpose of your wrapping models is to format the output of your wrapped models. Or... do this using converters. Creating a base class makes sense if you do this with the same kind of components all the time (labels I pressume?). If your components are very different, any of the other options are fine. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Form doesn't fire onsubmit when nested in a wizard
Hello guys,
I have a problem with the wizard component in Wicket 1.3.1. I have a
user form panel, containing a form with several fields. I put it in a
wizard, and have the following problem:
FormUser
public class FormPerson extends Panel {
// ...
public FormPerson(String formid) {
super(formid);
name = new RequiredTextField(name);
firstname = new RequiredTextField(firstname);
address = new RequiredTextField(address);
zip = new RequiredTextField(zip);
city = new RequiredTextField(city);
form = new Form(formperson, new CompoundPropertyModel(xxx)) {
@Override
protected void onError() {
super.onError();
updateFieldsCssClasses();
System.out.println(ON ERROR);
}
@Override
public void onSubmit() {
super.onSubmit();
System.out.println(on submit : + src.getFirstname());
}
};
add(form);
Now I put it in a Wizard component
- When there are errors on that form and I click the next button,
the method onError get correctly called
- When there are no errors and I click next, the method onSubmit get
not called
Have you any idea on what's going wrong?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: behavior for onComponentTagBody
I think we miss one call into Eyan's code: Consts.getTableBody(getMarkupId(), value) seems to be the crux. Martijn On 5/8/08, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: doesnt Label do this already? Yeah, I think just using getModelValueAsString would give the same results. Also, Label is the only (or one of the few at most) class(es) where overriding onComponentTagBody makes sense. Why not do your thing in a base class Eyal? Or... make model wrappers, where the sole purpose of your wrapping models is to format the output of your wrapped models. Or... do this using converters. Creating a base class makes sense if you do this with the same kind of components all the time (labels I pressume?). If your components are very different, any of the other options are fine. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ajax and Loop
Thank you! The ListView did the trick! -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2008 00:35 An: users@wicket.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Ajax and Loop Have you tried using a ListView in combination with a model (rather than passing a List to the constructor of ListView)? That won't trigger a re-population of the child components (ListItem and everything you add to it). For that, you need to call setReuseItems(false). Note that this can cause problems in forms (particularly with updating feedback), so when using forms, things like RefreshingView are often preferable. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A question about partial form updates with AJAX
are you sure that all the form elements that are in that div that you replace have the AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior attached? On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:22 AM, nate roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a form with several items. About half of the form is wrapped in a named div attached to a WebMarkupContainer. When a drop-down value changes, the div is updated via AJAX, re-rendering that part of the form. However, the components in that part of the form are not updated and so this re-rendering causes their values to revert to the initial value. I've used an AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior to accomplish the AJAX update. Is there a more appropriate behavior that I should use? When I use no AJAX, then the form maintains its values rather than resetting (but the whole page is refreshed.) How can I prevent a form reset? Thanks, Nate Roe
Problem with MultiFileUploadField and keeping rest of fields in model
Hello, I have use MultiFileUploadField for uploading pictures, everything works fine but when I use e.g. setMaxSize(Bytes.kilobytes(1024)) on the form and try to upload larger picture or pictures than limit, I got only one message about hitting limit size, and other fildes are not checked this time (e.g. required text fields). There is also problem with backuping fields from model after such sending, some fields are set up, and some remains empty. I have read about Notice that this component clears its model at the end of the request, so the uploaded files MUST be processed within the request they were uploaded., but I don't think it's the problem. I try to use 2 models one CompoundPropertyModel for texts on form, and one for new MultiFileUploadField(UPLOADS, new Model(new ArrayListFileUpload()), MAX_PICTURES_TO_UPLOAD); (earlier I had everything in CompoundPropertyModel). Anybody knows what could be wrong? Best regards, Adr - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with MultiFileUploadField and keeping rest of fields in model
when the file size exceeds the size limit, the request processing is kind of aborted and the other request params are not processed (no conversion, validation, ...). when the page is then rendered again, the formcomponents don't have an input value set, and that's why the fields are cleared and no error messages are displayed. there's already a jira issue for that, but actually there's not much that we can do, except some hacks that would temporarily allow an unlimited file size to be able to read the normal request parameters, and just discard the uploaded files. but then a (wicke[dt]) user can upload gigabytes of files and keeping your server, connection, ... busy. so that's not really a solution either. creative input on how to handle this is very much appreciated ;) Cheers, Gerolf On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Java Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have use MultiFileUploadField for uploading pictures, everything works fine but when I use e.g. setMaxSize(Bytes.kilobytes(1024)) on the form and try to upload larger picture or pictures than limit, I got only one message about hitting limit size, and other fildes are not checked this time (e.g. required text fields). There is also problem with backuping fields from model after such sending, some fields are set up, and some remains empty. I have read about Notice that this component clears its model at the end of the request, so the uploaded files MUST be processed within the request they were uploaded., but I don't think it's the problem. I try to use 2 models one CompoundPropertyModel for texts on form, and one for new MultiFileUploadField(UPLOADS, new Model(new ArrayListFileUpload()), MAX_PICTURES_TO_UPLOAD); (earlier I had everything in CompoundPropertyModel). Anybody knows what could be wrong? Best regards, Adr - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: forcing cookies to expire
i have no idea then what goes wrong
especially if it is just one request not a redirect one.
you could try to clean the cookes by directly using the httpresponseobject
yes.
Just that that one from the WebResponse
johan
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Andrew Broderick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tried that, and it didn't make any difference
(getRequestCycle().setRedirect(false)).
The page is called via a BookmarkablePageLink. Debugging reveals that the
constructor, below, is called every time the link is clicked, so it isn't an
issue of the code not being called. I also tried calling it via a
wicket:link as well - no dice.
Earlier, someone mentioned something about pushing to the
HttpServletResponse object. What does this mean, exactly?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 2:24 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: forcing cookies to expire
how is that page called/created?
if you do this:
public SignOut()
{
clearCookie(Register.REMEMBER_ME_COOKIE);
getSession().invalidate();
getRequestCycle().setRedirct(false)
}
what then
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Andrew Broderick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
clearCookie() is called in the constructor of a page called SignOut. The
entire constructor is:
public SignOut()
{
clearCookie(Register.REMEMBER_ME_COOKIE);
getSession().invalidate();
}
As I mentioned the cookie is never cleared. Is there something else I
need
to do?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 5:58 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: forcing cookies to expire
When is that clear cookie called?
Can you follow that call a bit more, is it pushed to the
httpservletresponse object?
On 5/5/08, Andrew Broderick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to manage cookies in Wicket. I can create them and read
them
no
problem, but forcing expiry by setting maxAge=0 does not seem to be
working.
Here is the code:
Set cookie:
public void setRememberMeCookie(String username)
{
Cookie cookie = new Cookie(REMEMBER_ME_COOKIE, username);
cookie.setMaxAge(-1);
cookie.setPath(/);
getWebRequestCycle().getWebResponse().addCookie(cookie);
}
Clear cookie:
private void clearCookie(String name)
{
Cookie cookie =
getWebRequestCycle().getWebRequest().getCookie(name);
cookie.setMaxAge(0);
getWebRequestCycle().getWebResponse().addCookie(cookie);
}
The code is definitely called. However, the cookie remains. What am I
doing
wrong?
Thanks
___
The information in this email or in any file attached
hereto is intended only for the personal and confiden-
tial use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is propri-
etary and confidential. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message you are hereby notified that
any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. This communica-
tion is for information purposes only and should not
be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial product. Email trans-
mission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-
free. P6070214
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: South African Wicket Users?
Hi Izak, Plenty of such companies around in the Netherlands it seems. Search through the list archives for ideas :-) Topicus, Xebia, Servoy, Hippo, Finalist to name a few. Good knowledge of Dutch is probably required, especially if you want to work outside of 'de randstad'. Hi there from the Hippo department :). I'd be more than happy to talk to you about a Wicket job. Our headquarters are in Amsterdam (which indeed is within the Randstad), and we have an office in San Francisco where we do mainly Portal development. English is the primary language for our developers - although most of them are Dutch. We use Wicket for Hippo CMS v7, our flagship content management system, and Hippo Portal, our portal engine. Your help would be very much appreciated as we expect to rely more and more on Wicket. Take a look at http://www.onehippo.com/en/about_us/jobs,senior-developer.html for some more inspiration. Kind regards, Arjé Cahn Hippo [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Amsterdam - Hippo B.V. Oosteinde 11 1017 WT Amsterdam +31(0)20-5224466 San Francisco - Hippo USA Inc. 101 H Street, suite Q Petaluma CA 94952-3329 +1 (707) 773-4646 www.onehippo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Hippo CMS community http://www.hippocms.org My weblog http://blogs.hippo.nl/arje -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CometServlet and WicketFilter
it seems that jetty 6 really uses servlet api 2.5 yes (this is by the way very hard to find... they really should have a list just as tomcat has) so somehow you have another servlet.jar there On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:32 AM, freak182 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Johan, I think im running on servlet 2.5 container because in the wicket-push example it uses the embeded jetty server 6.1.1 and in our project we are using embeded jetty server 6.1.4..i guess higher version make a difference or i might be wrong,pls advise?...Thanks a lot...Cheers.. Johan Compagner wrote: you can upgrade your compile servlet api just fine But are you also running in a container that uses 2.5??? johan On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:45 AM, freak182 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, my problem im having problem integrating the wicket-push example to our project using wicketfilter and since the wicket-push examples using wicketservlet..how can i configure this changes?i already ported to servlet-api 2.5. i change from... ServletContext servletContext = ((WebApplication)Application.get()).getServletContext(); to ServletContext servletContext = ((WebApplication)Application.get()).getWicketFilter().getFilterConfig().getServletContext(); but still error... java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: javax.servlet.ServletContext.getContextPath()Ljava/lang/String; at org.wicketstuff.push.cometd.CometdAbstractBehavior.getCometdServletPath(CometdAbstractBehavior.java:221) at org.wicketstuff.push.cometd.CometdAbstractBehavior.clinit(CometdAbstractBehavior.java:25) ...any idea how to do this thing??? Thanks a lot...Cheers -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CometServlet-and-WicketFilter-tp17101068p17101068.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CometServlet-and-WicketFilter-tp17101068p17117634.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: South African Wicket Users?
Actually, since I changed jobs, Finalist no longer uses Wicket but now JTeam (www.jteam.nl) does :) Regards, Erik. Plenty of such companies around in the Netherlands it seems. Search through the list archives for ideas :-) Topicus, Xebia, Servoy, Hippo, Finalist to name a few. Good knowledge of Dutch is probably required, especially if you want to work outside of 'de randstad'. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: South African Wicket Users?
WHY? On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, since I changed jobs, Finalist no longer uses Wicket but now JTeam (www.jteam.nl) does :) Regards, Erik. Plenty of such companies around in the Netherlands it seems. Search through the list archives for ideas :-) Topicus, Xebia, Servoy, Hippo, Finalist to name a few. Good knowledge of Dutch is probably required, especially if you want to work outside of 'de randstad'. -- Erik van Oosten http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket javascripts - reloading every one hour
I looked at it in detail, and it works as following: 1. You are right, when caching is too low - then browser makes request, with header If-Modified-Since. Response is 304 - that it was not modified. So the whole resource is not really downloaded, it is requested only, with short 304 response. 2. When caching time is longer, then: if resource is in caching time interval, then it is immediately taken from browser cache, without sending a request with If-Modified-Since. So the request is not performed, until caching time expires. So the overhead is not so big. Some complex applications may use many css and javascript files, and it is wasting of time for requesting these never changing files every hour again and again. Also, solution is very simple, elegant and breaks no API. And the resulting performance will be slightly better. It would be good, to have a possibility to cache these never changing static resources for a specified time, to prevent these needless requests. The only thing, that is needed to do for it, is to change WebResource#setHeaders() to take the caching time from some settings, so it is not hardcoded and can be configured by developer. What do you think about it - should I create a RFE, or it is ok ? Stefan Simik Johan Compagner wrote: But is it then really downloaded? Because the brower makes first a head request to it and that will say not changed On 5/8/08, Stefan Simik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi boys, I think, there is one problem with wicket ajax javascripts - there are reloading by browser every hour, because the Expire header is hardcoded to 3600 seconds in WebResource#setHeaders() method. It is really needed to repeatedly once an hour download these wicket javascripts ? These are static wicket javascripts, they are not subject of changes, so why could they not be cached for longer time, for example - 1 week, or longer. It would be better, if caching time should be configurable from some application settings. Could I create requet for improvement, or it is all ok ? thx Stefan Simik // I have consulted this before, but without result. So now, I am trying to show the problem in a simpler situation. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-javascripts---reloading-every-one-hour-tp17117009p17117009.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-javascripts---reloading-every-one-hour-tp17117009p17125087.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Label to Uppercase
Brilliant suggestions ... Thanks Eelco and Jeremy.
In our proj we attach a behavior to TextField/TextArea like this, but tied
to a specifc event as onblur.
public class ToUpperCaseBehavior extends AbstractBehavior {
public void onComponentTag(Component component, ComponentTag tag){
tag.put(getJsEvent(),this.value = this.value.toUpperCase(););
}
protected String getJsEvent(){
return onblur;
}
}
Thanks for your pointers and hope other fellow wicketers find it useful.
Cheers,
Andy
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Label-to-Uppercase-tp17114635p17126031.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket javascripts - reloading every one hour
file RFE On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Stefan Simik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I looked at it in detail, and it works as following: 1. You are right, when caching is too low - then browser makes request, with header If-Modified-Since. Response is 304 - that it was not modified. So the whole resource is not really downloaded, it is requested only, with short 304 response. 2. When caching time is longer, then: if resource is in caching time interval, then it is immediately taken from browser cache, without sending a request with If-Modified-Since. So the request is not performed, until caching time expires. So the overhead is not so big. Some complex applications may use many css and javascript files, and it is wasting of time for requesting these never changing files every hour again and again. Also, solution is very simple, elegant and breaks no API. And the resulting performance will be slightly better. It would be good, to have a possibility to cache these never changing static resources for a specified time, to prevent these needless requests. The only thing, that is needed to do for it, is to change WebResource#setHeaders() to take the caching time from some settings, so it is not hardcoded and can be configured by developer. What do you think about it - should I create a RFE, or it is ok ? Stefan Simik Johan Compagner wrote: But is it then really downloaded? Because the brower makes first a head request to it and that will say not changed On 5/8/08, Stefan Simik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi boys, I think, there is one problem with wicket ajax javascripts - there are reloading by browser every hour, because the Expire header is hardcoded to 3600 seconds in WebResource#setHeaders() method. It is really needed to repeatedly once an hour download these wicket javascripts ? These are static wicket javascripts, they are not subject of changes, so why could they not be cached for longer time, for example - 1 week, or longer. It would be better, if caching time should be configurable from some application settings. Could I create requet for improvement, or it is all ok ? thx Stefan Simik // I have consulted this before, but without result. So now, I am trying to show the problem in a simpler situation. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-javascripts---reloading-every-one-hour-tp17117009p17117009.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-javascripts---reloading-every-one-hour-tp17117009p17125087.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IActivePageBehaviorListener exception
Hi, I have wicket running clustered and occasionally see this exception: WicketMessage: Attempt to access unknown request listener interface IActivePageBehaviorListener Root cause: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Attempt to access unknown request listener interface IActivePageBehaviorListener at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.resolveListenerInterfaceTarget(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:397) at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.resolveRenderedPage(AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:461) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(WebRequestCycleProcessor.java:139) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1224) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1331) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:493) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:363) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:194) I happens when I start up my wicket instances, go to a page and start typing in an autocomplete text box. I only see it if I haven't done anything else in the session, ie all I have done is open the page. Im using wicket 1.3.3, jetty 6 and wadi to cluster my jetty sessions. I presume that I get this error because the session state hasnt been propagated yet when i open my first page. Has anyone had a similar error or seen this problem before? Any help would be great, Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IActivePageBehaviorListener-exception-tp17127279p17127279.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stateless link usage
a) is what I am doing now. b) is where the problem was, which is what the original question was about. Please see my opening post. igor.vaynberg wrote: there are two ways to do it: a) use a bookmarkablepagelink to go to the cart page and pass in the itemid+quantity to be added. this means that the cart page is responsible for adding the item to the cart. b) use a stateless link to add the item to cart, then setResponsePage(CartPage.class) == to a class not an instance to maintain a clean url with a redirect. -igor On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Ritz123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add To Cart links are on the product list page. I want the links to take the users to view cart page where they can see the cart content. igor.vaynberg wrote: so you want it to add something to cart, and then go where? to the same page? to the cart page? -igor On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Ritz123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually I want to add the product to the cart and not go to the detail page. They both are similar operation in a way, but there is one major difference. View Product has dedicated functionality of just viewing the product and nothing more, but View Cart page will be overloaded with add to cart functionality if I am understanding your point correctly. This actually brings up interesting design question with Wicket, what would be the best way to handle these kind of scenarios? In struts world, I had CartAction - which took care of all the operations (Add, View, Update and Delete) for Cart, what would be the equivalent design in Wicket? All the books and available material covers more of syntactic part of Wicket - but none covers the design - that I have found. I may be missing something and will appreciate any pointers. igor.vaynberg wrote: that's what stateless kinks do. If you want to go t a detail page use a bookmarkable link, not a stateles one. -igor On 5/6/08, Ritz123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a page containing bunch of products and addToCart link next to each product. On clicking the add to cart link, would like to add product to cart. I had Link and onClick() to do this - but recently encountered page expired message which is expected since the page becomes stateful due to the Link. Obviously this page is supposed to be stateless and hence I changed Link to StatelessLink using final product id inside the onclick. Now on application reload(due to hotdeploy) to simulate session expiry, dont get session expired message but link behaves weird in the sense, it seems to be reloading the contained page instead of going to the setResponsePage. Seems like I may be missing something. Is this the right approach in terms of making the page stateless? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stateless-link-usage-tp17093682p17093682.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stateless-link-usage-tp17093682p17108713.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stateless-link-usage-tp17093682p17120171.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stateless-link-usage-tp17093682p17127282.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
Re: CheckGroup and back Button problem
We seem to have a similar problem with a wizard page. We came across the
following code in Check.onComponentTag(..)
if (group.hasRawInput())
{
final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
if (input != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i input.length; i++)
{
if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
It looks like the Check component is checking for the existence of raw
input, but then using the input from the current request (via
getInputAsArray()) to render. Sounds fishy! I figure this could be related?
Thomas
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Steen Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have made a CheckGroup vith a ListView of Check's than works fine, except
that when it is submitted and I'm on the next page and want to go back
through a Wicket Button (not the browsers back button), all the checks are
empty even thouch the model behind still contains the selected obejcts.
Here
is the example code of the first page:
public HomePage() {
Order order = ((WicketSession) (Session.get())).getOrder();
if (order.getDigitalPackets() == null)
order.setDigitalPackets(new ArrayListProduct());
System.err.println(LIST1 = + order.getDigitalPackets());
Form form = new DigitalOrderForm(digitalOrderForm);
form.setModel(new CompoundPropertyModel(order));
add(form);
ListProduct allProducts = new ArrayListProduct();
for (int i = 0; i 10; i++) {
Product p = new Product();
p.setProductKey(i + );
p.setTotalPrice(new BigDecimal(100 + i));
p.setProductName(Product + i);
allProducts.add(p);
}
CheckGroup group = new CheckGroup(digitalPackets);
form.add(group);
ListView products = new ListView(products, allProducts) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
item.add(new Check(check,
item.getModel()).setEscapeModelStrings(false));
item.add(new Label(productName, new
PropertyModel(item.getModel(), productName)));
item.add(new Label(totalPrice, new
PropertyModel(item.getModel(), totalPrice)));
}
};
group.add(products.setReuseItems(true));
}
class DigitalOrderForm extends Form {
DigitalOrderForm(String s) {
super(s);
}
protected void onSubmit() {
Order order = (Order) getModelObject();
System.err.println(LIST2 = +
order.getDigitalPackets());
setResponsePage(PageTwo.class);
}
}
The second page is just a back button like this:
public PageTwo() {
add(new Button(back) {
public void onSubmit() {
setResponsePage(HomePage.class);
}
});
}
Anybody knows how to get the selected objects shown when you go back like
that ?
/Steen
Re: CheckGroup and back Button problem
If I instead of item.getModel() for the Check, uses some PropertyModel that
evaluates to a String identifier it works fine, but then only the identifier
is saved, and not the object, which as I understand it should be the
purpose. I haven't looked at the code, but I wander what uuid is exactly as
the equals apparently fail on non basic types. Will have a look when I get
the time. Thanks for the hint.
/Steen
2008/5/8 Thomas Mäder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We seem to have a similar problem with a wizard page. We came across the
following code in Check.onComponentTag(..)
if (group.hasRawInput())
{
final String[] input = group.getInputAsArray();
if (input != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i input.length; i++)
{
if (uuid.equals(input[i]))
{
tag.put(checked, checked);
It looks like the Check component is checking for the existence of raw
input, but then using the input from the current request (via
getInputAsArray()) to render. Sounds fishy! I figure this could be related?
Thomas
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Steen Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have made a CheckGroup vith a ListView of Check's than works fine,
except
that when it is submitted and I'm on the next page and want to go back
through a Wicket Button (not the browsers back button), all the checks
are
empty even thouch the model behind still contains the selected obejcts.
Here
is the example code of the first page:
public HomePage() {
Order order = ((WicketSession) (Session.get())).getOrder();
if (order.getDigitalPackets() == null)
order.setDigitalPackets(new ArrayListProduct());
System.err.println(LIST1 = + order.getDigitalPackets());
Form form = new DigitalOrderForm(digitalOrderForm);
form.setModel(new CompoundPropertyModel(order));
add(form);
ListProduct allProducts = new ArrayListProduct();
for (int i = 0; i 10; i++) {
Product p = new Product();
p.setProductKey(i + );
p.setTotalPrice(new BigDecimal(100 + i));
p.setProductName(Product + i);
allProducts.add(p);
}
CheckGroup group = new CheckGroup(digitalPackets);
form.add(group);
ListView products = new ListView(products, allProducts) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
item.add(new Check(check,
item.getModel()).setEscapeModelStrings(false));
item.add(new Label(productName, new
PropertyModel(item.getModel(), productName)));
item.add(new Label(totalPrice, new
PropertyModel(item.getModel(), totalPrice)));
}
};
group.add(products.setReuseItems(true));
}
class DigitalOrderForm extends Form {
DigitalOrderForm(String s) {
super(s);
}
protected void onSubmit() {
Order order = (Order) getModelObject();
System.err.println(LIST2 = +
order.getDigitalPackets());
setResponsePage(PageTwo.class);
}
}
The second page is just a back button like this:
public PageTwo() {
add(new Button(back) {
public void onSubmit() {
setResponsePage(HomePage.class);
}
});
}
Anybody knows how to get the selected objects shown when you go back like
that ?
/Steen
RE: DropDownChoice.onSelectionChanged() and model updating
Thanks for the reply. Calling clearInput() on the form components works. It has to be done on each individual component though, it seems. Is there a way to do it on the entire form, or a way to group fields on the form and do it on the group? Thanks -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 10:28 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: DropDownChoice.onSelectionChanged() and model updating when you submit a form the fields remember their raw values. if in onselectionchanged() of the ddc you change something that will change values of these other form components and you want that reflected you need to call clearInput() or modelUpdated() on those form components. -igor On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Andrew Broderick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a form that I want to repopulate when a drop down list is changed. If I change the underlying domain object in the onSelectionChanged(), the form fields are not updated to reflect the changes (yes, they do use a dynamic model). However, if I have a button next to the drop down list and the user clicks it, the exact same processing happens, and the form is updated. Why is this, and how can I get onSelectionChanged() to behave the same way? Thanks ___ The information in this email or in any file attached hereto is intended only for the personal and confiden- tial use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is propri- etary and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communica- tion is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product. Email trans- mission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error- free. P6070214 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stateless link usage
yes i read it, but you are not being very clear. a stateless link points to the page its on, just like Link does. the trick here is like i said to call setresponsepage(class); requestcycle.setredirect(true); this way your link points to ?wicket:interface=blahblah when you hit that the onclick is processed, and then a new response page is set with a redirect, so the browser redirects to a bookmarkable url and the ?wicket:interface url is replaced with a bookmarkable one. this way the user never has the ?wicket:interface url left in the url bar. -igor On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Ritz123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: a) is what I am doing now. b) is where the problem was, which is what the original question was about. Please see my opening post. igor.vaynberg wrote: there are two ways to do it: a) use a bookmarkablepagelink to go to the cart page and pass in the itemid+quantity to be added. this means that the cart page is responsible for adding the item to the cart. b) use a stateless link to add the item to cart, then setResponsePage(CartPage.class) == to a class not an instance to maintain a clean url with a redirect. -igor On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Ritz123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add To Cart links are on the product list page. I want the links to take the users to view cart page where they can see the cart content. igor.vaynberg wrote: so you want it to add something to cart, and then go where? to the same page? to the cart page? -igor On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Ritz123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually I want to add the product to the cart and not go to the detail page. They both are similar operation in a way, but there is one major difference. View Product has dedicated functionality of just viewing the product and nothing more, but View Cart page will be overloaded with add to cart functionality if I am understanding your point correctly. This actually brings up interesting design question with Wicket, what would be the best way to handle these kind of scenarios? In struts world, I had CartAction - which took care of all the operations (Add, View, Update and Delete) for Cart, what would be the equivalent design in Wicket? All the books and available material covers more of syntactic part of Wicket - but none covers the design - that I have found. I may be missing something and will appreciate any pointers. igor.vaynberg wrote: that's what stateless kinks do. If you want to go t a detail page use a bookmarkable link, not a stateles one. -igor On 5/6/08, Ritz123 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a page containing bunch of products and addToCart link next to each product. On clicking the add to cart link, would like to add product to cart. I had Link and onClick() to do this - but recently encountered page expired message which is expected since the page becomes stateful due to the Link. Obviously this page is supposed to be stateless and hence I changed Link to StatelessLink using final product id inside the onclick. Now on application reload(due to hotdeploy) to simulate session expiry, dont get session expired message but link behaves weird in the sense, it seems to be reloading the contained page instead of going to the setResponsePage. Seems like I may be missing something. Is this the right approach in terms of making the page stateless? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stateless-link-usage-tp17093682p17093682.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stateless-link-usage-tp17093682p17108713.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DropDownChoice.onSelectionChanged() and model updating
form.visitchildren(..) -igor On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Andrew Broderick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the reply. Calling clearInput() on the form components works. It has to be done on each individual component though, it seems. Is there a way to do it on the entire form, or a way to group fields on the form and do it on the group? Thanks -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 10:28 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: DropDownChoice.onSelectionChanged() and model updating when you submit a form the fields remember their raw values. if in onselectionchanged() of the ddc you change something that will change values of these other form components and you want that reflected you need to call clearInput() or modelUpdated() on those form components. -igor On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Andrew Broderick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a form that I want to repopulate when a drop down list is changed. If I change the underlying domain object in the onSelectionChanged(), the form fields are not updated to reflect the changes (yes, they do use a dynamic model). However, if I have a button next to the drop down list and the user clicks it, the exact same processing happens, and the form is updated. Why is this, and how can I get onSelectionChanged() to behave the same way? Thanks ___ The information in this email or in any file attached hereto is intended only for the personal and confiden- tial use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is propri- etary and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communica- tion is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product. Email trans- mission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error- free. P6070214 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: South African Wicket Users?
Actually, since I changed jobs, Finalist no longer uses Wicket but now JTeam (www.jteam.nl) does :) Now it's all up to Remco then :-) Good luck with your new job though. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unmount sub url
Hi, I've got a page mounted on /path1. I've got some files in a directory in my webapp root on /path1/dir How can I tell Wicket to give control back to the servlet container for dir? Currently (even using QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy) the mount eats /path1/dir and doesn't let me access the files there... Regards, Sebastiaan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Bug introduced somewhere after 1.2.2 is still in 1.3.3
I wrote earlier about my problems going from Wicket 1.2.2 to Wicket
1.2.6. This has to do with a RadioGroup component that I built;
whenever I used it on more than one page, clicking on one RadioGroup
caused the marker to disapper from all the other RadioGroups on the
page.
I wasn't given much help because Wicket 1.2 is end-of-life. Today I
tried the example on Wicked 1.3.3. I downloaded the QuickStart
application for Wicket 1.3.3, installed an upgraded version of my
RadioGroup component, modified the home page to show my RadioGroup panel
twice, and the bad behavior is still there.
By the way, the only change in the generated HTML that I could see was
that in Wicket 1.2.2 the buttons were defined:
input value=radios:2:radio ...etc.
-- with the numbers starting over again for each RadioGroup, whereas in
Wicket 1.2.6 and Wicket 1.3.3 it was more like:
input value=radio7 ...etc.
with the numbers _not_ starting over for each RadioGroup. Clicking on
one radio group causes the marker to disappear from the other radio
group -- as if part of Wicket were treating the buttons as though they
all belonged to the same radio group.
I'd like the Wicket 1.3 developers either to fix the bug in a future
release (after which I'll upgrade my entire application to 1.3), or tell
me what I'm doing wrong. How do I get the process started?
/Frank
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 12:31 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Change to API between Wicket 1.2 releases?
I dont know what this is, but 1.2 is pretty much end of life, so you
should try to debug what it is and patch your version Or just use a 1.2
version that works for you
On 4/29/08, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by what part it really is? Are you
asking me to find a simpler example exhibiting the problem? I mean,
the panel class follows the RadioGroup component example quite
closely:
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/compref/;jsessionid=C6F7701B6426601795
63
84008732211C?wicket:bookmarkablePage=%3Aorg.apache.wicket.examples.com
pr
ef.RadioGroupPage
The only significant difference is that instead of using a submit
button I override wantOnSelectionChangedNotification() to return true.
public class MyPanel extends Panel {
public MyPanel( String id,
String caption,
PropertyModel groupModel,
ChoiceOption[] options ) {
super(id, groupModel);
add( new Label(caption, caption) );
final RadioGroup group = new RadioGroup(group, groupModel)
{
//THIS IS THE ONLY PART THAT CHANGED FROM THE
COMPONENT EXAMPLE
protected boolean
wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications()
{
return true;
}
//IT POSTS BACK ON ANY SELECTION
};
add(group);
ListChoiceOption optionList = Arrays.asList( options );
ListView radios = new ListView(radios, optionList) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem listItem) {
listItem.add( new Radio(radio,
new PropertyModel(
listItem.getModel(),
value)
)
);
listItem.add( new Label(option,
new PropertyModel(
listItem.getModel(), label )
)
);
}
};
group.add(radios);
}
Did I do something wrong, or is that feature of RadioGroup indeed
broken in current releases of Wicket 1.2?
I really don't know enough about the Wicket internals to debug Wicket.
Can you suggest anything simpler that I could try to narrow down the
location of the problem? Would it work in Wicket 1.3?
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 3:54 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Change to API between Wicket 1.2 releases?
1.2 is a long time ago
I have no idea what change did break yours (and what did it fix) If
you could figure out what part it really is?
johan
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Frank Silbermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I completed a Wicket 1.2 project a couple of years ago, and I've
been maintaining it since then. I've been using Version 1.2.2
successfully,
and figured I might as well use the lastest release of that version
(1.2.7). Well, I'm trying to figure out why Wicket 1.2.7 broke my
code.
(I scrounged up a Wicket 1.2.6 release, and that also breaks it.)
Am I using the Wicket 1.2 API incorrectly? When it works in Wicket
1.2.2, am I
Re: Bug introduced somewhere after 1.2.2 is still in 1.3.3
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Frank Silbermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote earlier about my problems going from Wicket 1.2.2 to Wicket
1.2.6. This has to do with a RadioGroup component that I built;
whenever I used it on more than one page, clicking on one RadioGroup
caused the marker to disapper from all the other RadioGroups on the
page.
I wasn't given much help because Wicket 1.2 is end-of-life. Today I
tried the example on Wicked 1.3.3. I downloaded the QuickStart
application for Wicket 1.3.3, installed an upgraded version of my
RadioGroup component, modified the home page to show my RadioGroup panel
twice, and the bad behavior is still there.
By the way, the only change in the generated HTML that I could see was
that in Wicket 1.2.2 the buttons were defined:
input value=radios:2:radio ...etc.
-- with the numbers starting over again for each RadioGroup, whereas in
Wicket 1.2.6 and Wicket 1.3.3 it was more like:
input value=radio7 ...etc.
with the numbers _not_ starting over for each RadioGroup. Clicking on
one radio group causes the marker to disappear from the other radio
group -- as if part of Wicket were treating the buttons as though they
all belonged to the same radio group.
I'd like the Wicket 1.3 developers either to fix the bug in a future
release (after which I'll upgrade my entire application to 1.3), or tell
me what I'm doing wrong. How do I get the process started?
the usual way, create a jira issue and attach a quickstart project
that demonstrates the problem. than post the jira url back into this
thread. it is not very helpful when you post huge fragments of code
and markup into an email.
-igor
/Frank
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 12:31 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Change to API between Wicket 1.2 releases?
I dont know what this is, but 1.2 is pretty much end of life, so you
should try to debug what it is and patch your version Or just use a 1.2
version that works for you
On 4/29/08, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by what part it really is? Are you
asking me to find a simpler example exhibiting the problem? I mean,
the panel class follows the RadioGroup component example quite
closely:
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/compref/;jsessionid=C6F7701B6426601795
63
84008732211C?wicket:bookmarkablePage=%3Aorg.apache.wicket.examples.com
pr
ef.RadioGroupPage
The only significant difference is that instead of using a submit
button I override wantOnSelectionChangedNotification() to return true.
public class MyPanel extends Panel {
public MyPanel( String id,
String caption,
PropertyModel groupModel,
ChoiceOption[] options ) {
super(id, groupModel);
add( new Label(caption, caption) );
final RadioGroup group = new RadioGroup(group, groupModel)
{
//THIS IS THE ONLY PART THAT CHANGED FROM THE
COMPONENT EXAMPLE
protected boolean
wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications()
{
return true;
}
//IT POSTS BACK ON ANY SELECTION
};
add(group);
ListChoiceOption optionList = Arrays.asList( options );
ListView radios = new ListView(radios, optionList) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem listItem) {
listItem.add( new Radio(radio,
new PropertyModel(
listItem.getModel(),
value)
)
);
listItem.add( new Label(option,
new PropertyModel(
listItem.getModel(), label )
)
);
}
};
group.add(radios);
}
Did I do something wrong, or is that feature of RadioGroup indeed
broken in current releases of Wicket 1.2?
I really don't know enough about the Wicket internals to debug Wicket.
Can you suggest anything simpler that I could try to narrow down the
location of the problem? Would it work in Wicket 1.3?
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 3:54 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Change to API between Wicket 1.2 releases?
1.2 is a long time ago
I have no idea what change did break yours (and what did it fix) If
you could figure out what part it really is?
johan
On Tue,
Re: A question about partial form updates with AJAX
Hrm. I've only added the AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior to the components that cause the visibility of other components to change. The idea -- and I'm new to Wicket so it may not have been a very good one -- was to limit server round-trips until a rendering change is required. I'll add the behavior to all of the elements and see how that goes. On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: are you sure that all the form elements that are in that div that you replace have the AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior attached? On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:22 AM, nate roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a form with several items. About half of the form is wrapped in a named div attached to a WebMarkupContainer. When a drop-down value changes, the div is updated via AJAX, re-rendering that part of the form. However, the components in that part of the form are not updated and so this re-rendering causes their values to revert to the initial value. I've used an AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior to accomplish the AJAX update. Is there a more appropriate behavior that I should use? When I use no AJAX, then the form maintains its values rather than resetting (but the whole page is refreshed.) How can I prevent a form reset? Thanks, Nate Roe
Re: Form doesn't fire onsubmit when nested in a wizard
Hello Piller Sébastien: do you first generate some errors, press next (errors), fix them and then press next again? Maybe error messages will not be reset. Cheers Per - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bug introduced somewhere after 1.2.2 is still in 1.3.3
Well, then, as I am a beginner who hasn't worked much with open source, could you please point me to a reference that explains what a jira issue is and how to create one? (I'm guessing that it's an entry into some sort of bug tracking database.) Also, by attaching a quickstart Project do you mean simply a zipped archive of a project directory that was created by installing the quickstart project and minimally modifying it to create a web application that exhibits the bug? -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 12:13 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Bug introduced somewhere after 1.2.2 is still in 1.3.3 On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wrote earlier about my problems going from Wicket 1.2.2 to Wicket 1.2.6. This has to do with a RadioGroup component that I built; whenever I used it on more than one page, clicking on one RadioGroup caused the marker to disapper from all the other RadioGroups on the page. I wasn't given much help because Wicket 1.2 is end-of-life. Today I tried the example on Wicked 1.3.3. I downloaded the QuickStart application for Wicket 1.3.3, installed an upgraded version of my RadioGroup component, modified the home page to show my RadioGroup panel twice, and the bad behavior is still there. By the way, the only change in the generated HTML that I could see was that in Wicket 1.2.2 the buttons were defined: input value=radios:2:radio ...etc. -- with the numbers starting over again for each RadioGroup, whereas in Wicket 1.2.6 and Wicket 1.3.3 it was more like: input value=radio7 ...etc. with the numbers _not_ starting over for each RadioGroup. Clicking on one radio group causes the marker to disappear from the other radio group -- as if part of Wicket were treating the buttons as though they all belonged to the same radio group. I'd like the Wicket 1.3 developers either to fix the bug in a future release (after which I'll upgrade my entire application to 1.3), or tell me what I'm doing wrong. How do I get the process started? the usual way, create a jira issue and attach a quickstart project that demonstrates the problem. than post the jira url back into this thread. it is not very helpful when you post huge fragments of code and markup into an email. -igor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug introduced somewhere after 1.2.2 is still in 1.3.3
Hello Frank Silbermann: Well, then, as I am a beginner who hasn't worked much with open source, could you please point me to a reference that explains what a jira issue is and how to create one? (I'm guessing that it's an entry into some sort of bug tracking database.) Sure you can. You could use the mailing list search at nabble.com because the question was asked and answered once a month :-) Use http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ - goto wicket - login (you have to get an account) - press new issue and follow instructions. Its realy easy and helps alot to stay in touch with the open issues. Also, by attaching a quickstart Project do you mean simply a zipped archive of a project directory that was created by installing the quickstart project and minimally modifying it to create a web application that exhibits the bug? Yes. Cheers Per - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AutoCompleteTextField type mismatch in line 227
Yes I am just starting to try and get the autocompletetextfield working on my app and I am using wicket 1.3. as well and it is doing the same thing. It is throwing a js type mismatch error. Works fine in firefox but not in IE. Did you figure out the problem? T Niels Bo wrote: Hi I just swithed from 1.3.2 to 1.3.3 and that resultet in a javascript error type mismatch in line 227, wich is this line in wicket-autocomplete.js: menu.style.zIndex=index==auto?index:Number(index)+1; Only in IE (6.0) - firefox works fine. Does anyone else see this problem? Niels -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AutoCompleteTextField-%22type-mismatch%22-in-line-227-tp16560166p17135623.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AutoCompleteTextField type mismatch in line 227
it's fixed in the upcoming 1.3.4 and the already release 1.4-M1 Gerolf On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:20 PM, taygolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes I am just starting to try and get the autocompletetextfield working on my app and I am using wicket 1.3. as well and it is doing the same thing. It is throwing a js type mismatch error. Works fine in firefox but not in IE. Did you figure out the problem? T Niels Bo wrote: Hi I just swithed from 1.3.2 to 1.3.3 and that resultet in a javascript error type mismatch in line 227, wich is this line in wicket-autocomplete.js: menu.style.zIndex=index==auto?index:Number(index)+1; Only in IE (6.0) - firefox works fine. Does anyone else see this problem? Niels -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AutoCompleteTextField-%22type-mismatch%22-in-line-227-tp16560166p17135623.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Default choice
Hi!
I'm using the getDefaultChoice to have --- choose brand in my drop box.
@Override
protected java.lang.CharSequence getDefaultChoice(final Object selected){
return option value=\\+
getLocalizer().getString(category.select.edit, CategoryPage.this )
+/option;
}
This is rather teedious to have this in every drop list. I it possible to
have a default choice without using this? I know I can set setNullValid(
true ) but I can't handle the localization default choice.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Default-choice-tp17135706p17135706.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bug introduced somewhere after 1.2.2 is still in 1.3.3
Here's the URL of my jira issue. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1601 The issue has attached a quickstart project and a screen print. -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 12:13 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Bug introduced somewhere after 1.2.2 is still in 1.3.3 On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Frank Silbermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wrote earlier about my problems going from Wicket 1.2.2 to Wicket 1.2.6. This has to do with a RadioGroup component that I built; whenever I used it on more than one page, clicking on one RadioGroup caused the marker to disapper from all the other RadioGroups on the page. I wasn't given much help because Wicket 1.2 is end-of-life. Today I tried the example on Wicked 1.3.3. I downloaded the QuickStart application for Wicket 1.3.3, installed an upgraded version of my RadioGroup component, modified the home page to show my RadioGroup panel twice, and the bad behavior is still there. By the way, the only change in the generated HTML that I could see was that in Wicket 1.2.2 the buttons were defined: input value=radios:2:radio ...etc. -- with the numbers starting over again for each RadioGroup, whereas in Wicket 1.2.6 and Wicket 1.3.3 it was more like: input value=radio7 ...etc. with the numbers _not_ starting over for each RadioGroup. Clicking on one radio group causes the marker to disappear from the other radio group -- as if part of Wicket were treating the buttons as though they all belonged to the same radio group. I'd like the Wicket 1.3 developers either to fix the bug in a future release (after which I'll upgrade my entire application to 1.3), or tell me what I'm doing wrong. How do I get the process started? the usual way, create a jira issue and attach a quickstart project that demonstrates the problem. than post the jira url back into this thread. it is not very helpful when you post huge fragments of code and markup into an email. -igor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Detached models
I have some questions on detached models for Wicket
Let's say I create a detached model like this
IModel detachedModel = new LoadableDetachableModel(){
protected Object load(){
return . spring injected hibernate dao lets say Categories
}
};
So now I'll have a detached model.
now I'll use a ListView to populate data from the detachedModel
add( new ListView( myId , detachedModel ){
public void populateItem( ListItem item) {
final Category category = (Category) item.getModelObject();
item.add( new Link( link ){
public void onClick(){
setResponsePage( new CategoryPage( category ) );
}
} );
}
});
I hope this is right. This is obviously from the top of my head. My question
is.
When In my CategoryPage after a user has clicked the link in the list item
is the Category that I got
from a detached model detached? Or is it a hibernate proxy? If so, how can I
get it detached all the way?
Igor wrote something about a detached DataProvider. Do I need to use
DataProvider to get detached hibernate pojos? I would really want to know
how to do this. Right now, I'm in spagetti code with DAOS that throws
LazyLoading exceptions and Wicket pages that does the same.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Detached-models-tp17136199p17136199.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detached models
Why do you need it detached all the way?
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have some questions on detached models for Wicket
Let's say I create a detached model like this
IModel detachedModel = new LoadableDetachableModel(){
protected Object load(){
return . spring injected hibernate dao lets say Categories
}
};
So now I'll have a detached model.
now I'll use a ListView to populate data from the detachedModel
add( new ListView( myId , detachedModel ){
public void populateItem( ListItem item) {
final Category category = (Category) item.getModelObject();
item.add( new Link( link ){
public void onClick(){
setResponsePage( new CategoryPage( category ) );
}
} );
}
});
I hope this is right. This is obviously from the top of my head. My question
is.
When In my CategoryPage after a user has clicked the link in the list item
is the Category that I got
from a detached model detached? Or is it a hibernate proxy? If so, how can I
get it detached all the way?
Igor wrote something about a detached DataProvider. Do I need to use
DataProvider to get detached hibernate pojos? I would really want to know
how to do this. Right now, I'm in spagetti code with DAOS that throws
LazyLoading exceptions and Wicket pages that does the same.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Detached-models-tp17136199p17136199.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detached models
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
add( new ListView( myId , detachedModel ){
public void populateItem( ListItem item) {
final Category category = (Category) item.getModelObject();
item.add( new Link( link ){
public void onClick(){
setResponsePage( new CategoryPage( category ) );
^-- this is bad. now your anonymous link component is
holding onto a detached category object, so if in categorypage's
constructor you try to access a lazy collection you will get an
exception. the proper thing to do here is to:
final Category category = (Category) item.getModelObject();
final IModel cat=new HibernateEntityModel(category);
item.add(new Link(link, cat){ setResponsePage(new CategoryPage(getModel()); }
the idea is to pass a lookup(a model) rather then the entity itself.
this way you are never holding onto the entity outside of a hibernate
session.
-igor
}
} );
}
});
I hope this is right. This is obviously from the top of my head. My question
is.
When In my CategoryPage after a user has clicked the link in the list item
is the Category that I got
from a detached model detached? Or is it a hibernate proxy? If so, how can I
get it detached all the way?
Igor wrote something about a detached DataProvider. Do I need to use
DataProvider to get detached hibernate pojos? I would really want to know
how to do this. Right now, I'm in spagetti code with DAOS that throws
LazyLoading exceptions and Wicket pages that does the same.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Detached-models-tp17136199p17136199.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detached models
if you want nicer code then use a dataview with a dataprovider, that
really is geared much better towards database data then listview, and
dataprovider.model() is a great place to wrap the entity with model,
so your code can look like this:
public void populateItem( tem item) {
item.add( new Link( link , item.getModel()) {
setResponsePage(new CategoryPage(getModel());}
-igor
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
add( new ListView( myId , detachedModel ){
public void populateItem( ListItem item) {
final Category category = (Category) item.getModelObject();
item.add( new Link( link ){
public void onClick(){
setResponsePage( new CategoryPage( category ) );
^-- this is bad. now your anonymous link component is
holding onto a detached category object, so if in categorypage's
constructor you try to access a lazy collection you will get an
exception. the proper thing to do here is to:
final Category category = (Category) item.getModelObject();
final IModel cat=new HibernateEntityModel(category);
item.add(new Link(link, cat){ setResponsePage(new
CategoryPage(getModel()); }
the idea is to pass a lookup(a model) rather then the entity itself.
this way you are never holding onto the entity outside of a hibernate
session.
-igor
}
} );
}
});
I hope this is right. This is obviously from the top of my head. My
question
is.
When In my CategoryPage after a user has clicked the link in the list item
is the Category that I got
from a detached model detached? Or is it a hibernate proxy? If so, how
can I
get it detached all the way?
Igor wrote something about a detached DataProvider. Do I need to use
DataProvider to get detached hibernate pojos? I would really want to know
how to do this. Right now, I'm in spagetti code with DAOS that throws
LazyLoading exceptions and Wicket pages that does the same.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Detached-models-tp17136199p17136199.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detached models
Thanks Igor! So if I use the sample code you gave me and, when getting the Object from the constructor on the response page I will have a detached object. Do I have to load the object from database here? When looking at the Phone book example I see you pass id instead of object. Is this more lightweight or is it better practice to just pass the id and not the whole object? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Detached-models-tp17136199p17137533.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unmount sub url
Hi,
I've got a page mounted on /path1.
I've got some files in a directory in my webapp root on /path1/dir
How can I tell Wicket to give control back to the servlet container for
dir? Currently (even using QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy) the mount eats
/path1/dir and doesn't let me access the files there...
Regards,
Sebastiaan
I looked at the wicket filter code, and it does not seem that this is
possible at the moment (though I might be missing something). I see at
least two possible ways to add this feature:
1) using a special exception (I did not think about the name):
if (isWicketRequest(relativePath))
{
try
{
...
}
catch (NotWicketAfterAllException e) {
// Pass down the filter chain.
chain.doFilter(request, response);
}
finally
{
// always unset the application thread local
Application.unset();
RequestContext.unset();
}
}
2) using a special RequestCodingStrategy, i.e.
UnmountedRequestCodingStrategy and tweaking isWicketRequest to return
false if it detects this request coding strategy...
The first solution is more powerful (it allows you to pass the request
down the filter chain from pretty much anywhere), but it might be a bit
dangerous (what if you already read from the request/response, etc), and
it requires your own request strategy implementation to check if it
happens to be an url that you want to pass down the filter chain which
usually ends up being ugly string compares)...
The second solution is cleaner in my opinion and it would allow you to
unmount or mount as a pass through specific urls...
What do you guys think?
Regards,
Sebastiaan
Sebastiaan van Erk wrote:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: South African Wicket Users?
Plenty of such companies around in the Netherlands it seems. Search through the list archives for ideas :-) Topicus, Xebia, Servoy, Hippo, Finalist to name a few. Good knowledge of Dutch is probably required, especially if you want to work outside of 'de randstad'. Hi there from the Hippo department :). I'd be more than happy to talk to you about a Wicket job. Our headquarters are in Amsterdam (which indeed is within the Randstad), and we have an office in San Francisco where we do mainly Portal development. English is the primary language for our developers - although most of them are Dutch. We use Wicket for Hippo CMS v7, our flagship content management system, and Hippo Portal, our portal engine. Your help would be very much appreciated as we expect to rely more and more on Wicket. Take a look at http://www.onehippo.com/en/about_us/jobs,senior-developer.html for some more inspiration. Interesting, do you also work with freelancers? :) gr Thies - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wicket javascripts - reloading every one hour
OK, thx https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1602 Stefan Simik Johan Compagner wrote: file RFE -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-javascripts---reloading-every-one-hour-tp17117009p17137997.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unmount sub url
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Sebastiaan van Erk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've got a page mounted on /path1. I've got some files in a directory in my webapp root on /path1/dir How can I tell Wicket to give control back to the servlet container for dir? Currently (even using QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy) the mount eats /path1/dir and doesn't let me access the files there... Regards, Sebastiaan I looked at the wicket filter code, and it does not seem that this is possible at the moment (though I might be missing something). I see at least two possible ways to add this feature: 1) using a special exception (I did not think about the name): ... 2) using a special RequestCodingStrategy, i.e. UnmountedRequestCodingStrategy and tweaking isWicketRequest to return false if it detects this request coding strategy... What do you guys think? Well, my first impulse is to say that mounting was never meant to serve complex cases, and that instead of mounting you'd do best with a custom request coding strategy instead. That said though, I'm not against something like 2 if we have a nice construct for it. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Javascript adding input
Let's say that hypothetically I used javascript to add an input to a form in its onload method. How can I get wicket to become aware of that input so I can do things like validate it, etc.?
Re: unmount sub url
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Sebastiaan van Erk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) using a special RequestCodingStrategy, i.e.
UnmountedRequestCodingStrategy and tweaking isWicketRequest to return false
if it detects this request coding strategy...
What do you guys think?
Well, my first impulse is to say that mounting was never meant to
serve complex cases, and that instead of mounting you'd do best with a
custom request coding strategy instead.
That said though, I'm not against something like 2 if we have a nice
construct for it.
Eelco
I made a proof of concept which works, though I have some questions
about it (I'm not really into the whole request coding strategy API).
Basically what I did was:
1) Add PassThroughUrlCodingStrategy:
public class PassThroughUrlCodingStrategy extends
AbstractRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy
{
public PassThroughUrlCodingStrategy(final String mountPath) {
super(mountPath);
}
public IRequestTarget decode(RequestParameters requestParameters) {
return null;
}
public CharSequence encode(IRequestTarget requestTarget) {
return null;
}
public boolean matches(IRequestTarget requestTarget) {
return false;
}
}
That's the one I have questions about: I'm not quite sure how to
implement these methods properly.
2) Modify wicket filter isWicketRequest
// Mounted page
IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy urlCodingStrategy =
webApplication.getRequestCycleProcessor()
.getRequestCodingStrategy()
.urlCodingStrategyForPath(relativePath);
// Mounted and not pass through?
return urlCodingStrategy != null
!(urlCodingStrategy instanceof PassThroughUrlCodingStrategy);
3) Mount my PassThroughUrlCodingStrategy in my Application.init() method:
mount(new QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy(/path1, MyPage.class));
mount(new PassThroughUrlCodingStrategy(/path1/dir));
4) Fired up tomcat and tested it. :-) It works...
That leaves me with the questions about the decode, encode and
matches... How should I implement them properly? :-)
Regards,
Sebastiaan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Form onSubmit called after Page components created
Hi, I've noticed that when submitting a (stateless) Form page the onSubmit() method of the form is only called once all the Page components have all been created, and likewise any model objects relating to the form are only populated once the page components have been rendered. This means that it is hard to create dynamic content in the page that is dependent on the contents of the submitted form without reloading the page using setResponsePage(MyPage.class, pageParams) at the end of the onSubmit() call of the form. Has anyone else noticed this and is there a way around it? i.e. can the models be populated before the page components are created? Rgs Joel
RE: AutoCompleteTextField type mismatch in line 227
Although, it still has some issues when dealing with mouseover and keyboard events combo ;o) -Original Message- From: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 4:23 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: AutoCompleteTextField type mismatch in line 227 it's fixed in the upcoming 1.3.4 and the already release 1.4-M1 Gerolf On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:20 PM, taygolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes I am just starting to try and get the autocompletetextfield working on my app and I am using wicket 1.3. as well and it is doing the same thing. It is throwing a js type mismatch error. Works fine in firefox but not in IE. Did you figure out the problem? T Niels Bo wrote: Hi I just swithed from 1.3.2 to 1.3.3 and that resultet in a javascript error type mismatch in line 227, wich is this line in wicket-autocomplete.js: menu.style.zIndex=index==auto?index:Number(index)+1; Only in IE (6.0) - firefox works fine. Does anyone else see this problem? Niels -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AutoCompleteTextField-%22type-mismatch%22-in-lin e-227-tp16560166p17135623.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AutoCompleteTextField type mismatch in line 227
in case you mean [0], that's going to be dealt with probably tomorrow ;) [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1595 On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Although, it still has some issues when dealing with mouseover and keyboard events combo ;o) -Original Message- From: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 4:23 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: AutoCompleteTextField type mismatch in line 227 it's fixed in the upcoming 1.3.4 and the already release 1.4-M1 Gerolf On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:20 PM, taygolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes I am just starting to try and get the autocompletetextfield working on my app and I am using wicket 1.3. as well and it is doing the same thing. It is throwing a js type mismatch error. Works fine in firefox but not in IE. Did you figure out the problem? T Niels Bo wrote: Hi I just swithed from 1.3.2 to 1.3.3 and that resultet in a javascript error type mismatch in line 227, wich is this line in wicket-autocomplete.js: menu.style.zIndex=index==auto?index:Number(index)+1; Only in IE (6.0) - firefox works fine. Does anyone else see this problem? Niels -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AutoCompleteTextField-%22type-mismatch%22-in-lin e-227-tp16560166p17135623.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good wicket patterns
After some 6 months of wicket ive come accross some wierd scenarios Go'ol request/response 1. Sub FormComponent hierarchies that needed to be manually visited to have thier vaidate and updateModel called. It was a criteria/search panel that supplied a form with data. Just a bit awkward to create those visitors in the middle of the code. Should I have done that with a nested Form? 2. Where should you keep your models? Should a big Component hierarcy have one big model with its parts extracted and passed on to child components? Analogy - repeaters (lists of object renditions/Label(...,obj.toString) take lists-of-objects. Or, is more advisable to keep a component's model contained within itself? I have yet to find a good practice here. Ajax 3. Now im working with more Ajax. What is a good inter component communication scheme? Swing has its listeners, but in wicket i tend to call methods on dependent components from ajax event handlers. Is this a good approach - (it atleast dont feel so good)? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Good-wicket-patterns-tp17139005p17139005.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AutoCompleteTextField type mismatch in line 227
that is it :o) i'm assuming the same issue also causes the selection to be lost on occasion -Original Message- From: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 7:57 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: AutoCompleteTextField type mismatch in line 227 in case you mean [0], that's going to be dealt with probably tomorrow ;) [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1595 On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Hoover, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Although, it still has some issues when dealing with mouseover and keyboard events combo ;o) -Original Message- From: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 4:23 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: AutoCompleteTextField type mismatch in line 227 it's fixed in the upcoming 1.3.4 and the already release 1.4-M1 Gerolf On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:20 PM, taygolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes I am just starting to try and get the autocompletetextfield working on my app and I am using wicket 1.3. as well and it is doing the same thing. It is throwing a js type mismatch error. Works fine in firefox but not in IE. Did you figure out the problem? T Niels Bo wrote: Hi I just swithed from 1.3.2 to 1.3.3 and that resultet in a javascript error type mismatch in line 227, wich is this line in wicket-autocomplete.js: menu.style.zIndex=index==auto?index:Number(index)+1; Only in IE (6.0) - firefox works fine. Does anyone else see this problem? Niels -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AutoCompleteTextField-%22type-mismatch%22-in-l in e-227-tp16560166p17135623.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detached models
I typically don't like to have my UI code directly interact with the
ORM implementation (hibernate in this case). For my applications, I
pass a Repository (think DAO) object and the object's id into the
LoadableDetachableModel.
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can pass in the id if you want, i prefer to work with objects...so
class entitymodel extends ldm {
private final String cn;
private final Serialializable id;
public entitymodel(class cl, serializable id) { cn=cl.getName();
this.id=id; }
public entitymodel(identifiable entity) {
cn=hibernateutils.unproxy(entity).getclass().getname();
id=entity.getid(); }
public object load() { session.get(class.forname(cn), id); }
}
this is just more convinient, obviously identifiable is an interface
we use here internally.
-igor
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Igor!
So if I use the sample code you gave me and, when getting the Object from
the constructor
on the response page I will have a detached object.
Do I have to load the object from database here? When looking at the Phone
book example I see you pass id instead of object. Is this more lightweight
or is it better practice to just pass the id and not the whole object?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Detached-models-tp17136199p17137533.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DropDownChoice throws IllegalArgumentException with Integer values
This is the error I'm getting: [DEBUG LoadAdDataInterceptor] Loaded AdData:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ERROR RequestCycle] Cannot format given Object as a Number java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot format given Object as a Number at java.text.DecimalFormat.format(DecimalFormat.java:480) at java.text.Format.format(Format.java:133) at org.apache.wicket.util.convert.converters.AbstractNumberConverter.conver tToString(AbstractNumberConverter.java:109) at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.PropertyResolverConverter.convert(PropertyRe solverConverter.java:84) I'm using ListSelectOption to populate the DropDownChoice, as per the online example: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/another-dropdownchoice-example-by-adam.ht ml The only change I made to SelectOption is to set the 'value' field to an Integer (which I need for my model). Anyone any ideas as to what's going on? I'm pretty sure I didn't swap the label/value pairs as the labels show up properly. Thanks, Michael
Re: Good wicket patterns
e.g.
public class AjaxEvent
{
private SetComponent listeners = new HashSetComponent();
public void register(Component listener)
{
listeners.add(listener);
}
public void fire(AjaxRequestTarget request)
{
for (Component listener : listeners)
request.addComponent(listener);
}
}
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ajax
3. Now im working with more Ajax. What is a good inter component
communication scheme? Swing has its listeners, but in wicket i tend to
call
methods on dependent components from ajax event handlers. Is this a good
approach - (it atleast dont feel so good)?
I try to have my components just be a view of their model. Then it's
just a matter of setting the model(s) appropriately and refreshing the
components.
Alternately, create a AjaxEvent class that you subclass to represent
each of the actions in which you're interested. Put a collection of
those on your Page. Then have allow each component to register itself
as a listener of an event. Then an ajax call would result in
SomeAjaxEvent.fire(AjaxTargetRequest) and that would in turn call
addComponent() for each registered listener component.
- Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CometServlet and WicketFilter
Hello Johan, Thanks for the advice...i will try to look at for any servlet.jar...anyway our project is big and i dont know want jars my teammate added-n-added... :-) Thanks a lot..Cheers Johan Compagner wrote: it seems that jetty 6 really uses servlet api 2.5 yes (this is by the way very hard to find... they really should have a list just as tomcat has) so somehow you have another servlet.jar there On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:32 AM, freak182 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Johan, I think im running on servlet 2.5 container because in the wicket-push example it uses the embeded jetty server 6.1.1 and in our project we are using embeded jetty server 6.1.4..i guess higher version make a difference or i might be wrong,pls advise?...Thanks a lot...Cheers.. Johan Compagner wrote: you can upgrade your compile servlet api just fine But are you also running in a container that uses 2.5??? johan On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:45 AM, freak182 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, my problem im having problem integrating the wicket-push example to our project using wicketfilter and since the wicket-push examples using wicketservlet..how can i configure this changes?i already ported to servlet-api 2.5. i change from... ServletContext servletContext = ((WebApplication)Application.get()).getServletContext(); to ServletContext servletContext = ((WebApplication)Application.get()).getWicketFilter().getFilterConfig().getServletContext(); but still error... java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: javax.servlet.ServletContext.getContextPath()Ljava/lang/String; at org.wicketstuff.push.cometd.CometdAbstractBehavior.getCometdServletPath(CometdAbstractBehavior.java:221) at org.wicketstuff.push.cometd.CometdAbstractBehavior.clinit(CometdAbstractBehavior.java:25) ...any idea how to do this thing??? Thanks a lot...Cheers -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CometServlet-and-WicketFilter-tp17101068p17101068.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CometServlet-and-WicketFilter-tp17101068p17117634.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CometServlet-and-WicketFilter-tp17101068p17139611.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DropDownChoice throws IllegalArgumentException with Integer values
Okay, I just stepped through this and getting the feeling that 'somehow' the label is being passed on to the model. Now, if the label is '1' it works fine, but if it's '1 day', then I get that error. The question here is: why is the label being passed back to the model? Doesn't make any sense - I'm using a ChoiceRenderer as such: new ChoiceRenderer(label, value) Do I also need to add some kind of converter to properly assign the model? Any input would be appreciated. Michael -Original Message- From: Michael Mehrle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 5:19 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: DropDownChoice throws IllegalArgumentException with Integer values This is the error I'm getting: [DEBUG LoadAdDataInterceptor] Loaded AdData:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ERROR RequestCycle] Cannot format given Object as a Number java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot format given Object as a Number at java.text.DecimalFormat.format(DecimalFormat.java:480) at java.text.Format.format(Format.java:133) at org.apache.wicket.util.convert.converters.AbstractNumberConverter.conver tToString(AbstractNumberConverter.java:109) at org.apache.wicket.util.lang.PropertyResolverConverter.convert(PropertyRe solverConverter.java:84) I'm using ListSelectOption to populate the DropDownChoice, as per the online example: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/another-dropdownchoice-example-by-adam.ht ml The only change I made to SelectOption is to set the 'value' field to an Integer (which I need for my model). Anyone any ideas as to what's going on? I'm pretty sure I didn't swap the label/value pairs as the labels show up properly. Thanks, Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Form onSubmit called after Page components created
the stateless stuff has to recreate the component hierarchy first - eg the form instance has to exist before you can call onsubmit on it :) however, inside onsubmit you can do any component replacement you want, just like in a non-stateless page. -igor On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Joel Halbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've noticed that when submitting a (stateless) Form page the onSubmit() method of the form is only called once all the Page components have all been created, and likewise any model objects relating to the form are only populated once the page components have been rendered. This means that it is hard to create dynamic content in the page that is dependent on the contents of the submitted form without reloading the page using setResponsePage(MyPage.class, pageParams) at the end of the onSubmit() call of the form. Has anyone else noticed this and is there a way around it? i.e. can the models be populated before the page components are created? Rgs Joel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detached models
im not that religious about this. i dont like to pass daos around or
have to look them up, not when i am using a central persistence tech
like hibernate/jpa. so i think of my entitymodel as a repository for a
single object :) you can give it the object or the class and id and it
knows how to load it. the need to create a loadable detachable model
for a persistent object is way too common to neglect such a
convenience. entitymodel encapsulates the lookup so nothing leaks, but
thats just me :)
-igor
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 5:14 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I typically don't like to have my UI code directly interact with the
ORM implementation (hibernate in this case). For my applications, I
pass a Repository (think DAO) object and the object's id into the
LoadableDetachableModel.
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can pass in the id if you want, i prefer to work with objects...so
class entitymodel extends ldm {
private final String cn;
private final Serialializable id;
public entitymodel(class cl, serializable id) { cn=cl.getName();
this.id=id; }
public entitymodel(identifiable entity) {
cn=hibernateutils.unproxy(entity).getclass().getname();
id=entity.getid(); }
public object load() { session.get(class.forname(cn), id); }
}
this is just more convinient, obviously identifiable is an interface
we use here internally.
-igor
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Igor!
So if I use the sample code you gave me and, when getting the Object
from
the constructor
on the response page I will have a detached object.
Do I have to load the object from database here? When looking at the
Phone
book example I see you pass id instead of object. Is this more
lightweight
or is it better practice to just pass the id and not the whole object?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Detached-models-tp17136199p17137533.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detached models
Well, I have a similar class called DetachableEntityModel (Entity is
an interface we devised to mark something as a persistent entity):
public class DetachableEntityModelT extends Entity extends
LoadableDetachableModelT
{
private RepositoryT repository;
private String id;
public DetachableEntityModel(RepositoryT repository, String id)
{
this.repository = repository;
this.id = id;
}
public T load()
{
return repository.getById(id);
}
}
This way, my model isn't tied to the ORM implementation at all. I
just code to the Repository interface which can be implemented using
any ORM technology you like (Hibernate, JPA, iBATIS, etc.). I
understand that most folks aren't as religious as me about this, but
I have learned that when I go away from my best practices my code
becomes more difficult to unit test (I still stray from time to time,
though :).
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
im not that religious about this. i dont like to pass daos around or
have to look them up, not when i am using a central persistence tech
like hibernate/jpa. so i think of my entitymodel as a repository for a
single object :) you can give it the object or the class and id and it
knows how to load it. the need to create a loadable detachable model
for a persistent object is way too common to neglect such a
convenience. entitymodel encapsulates the lookup so nothing leaks, but
thats just me :)
-igor
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 5:14 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I typically don't like to have my UI code directly interact with the
ORM implementation (hibernate in this case). For my applications, I
pass a Repository (think DAO) object and the object's id into the
LoadableDetachableModel.
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can pass in the id if you want, i prefer to work with objects...so
class entitymodel extends ldm {
private final String cn;
private final Serialializable id;
public entitymodel(class cl, serializable id) { cn=cl.getName();
this.id=id; }
public entitymodel(identifiable entity) {
cn=hibernateutils.unproxy(entity).getclass().getname();
id=entity.getid(); }
public object load() { session.get(class.forname(cn), id); }
}
this is just more convinient, obviously identifiable is an interface
we use here internally.
-igor
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Igor!
So if I use the sample code you gave me and, when getting the Object
from
the constructor
on the response page I will have a detached object.
Do I have to load the object from database here? When looking at the
Phone
book example I see you pass id instead of object. Is this more
lightweight
or is it better practice to just pass the id and not the whole object?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Detached-models-tp17136199p17137533.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
