date:20110120

Better use http://oss.sonatype.org

2011/1/20 Major Péter majorpe...@sch.bme.hu

 http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/wicketstuff/

 Regards,
 Peter

 2011-01-20 12:43 keltezéssel, Ayodeji Aladejebi írta:

  PLease where do I download stable releases on Wicket Stuff compatible with
 Wicket 1.4.x?

 thanks

 On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Michael O'Cleirigh
 michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca  wrote:

  Hello,

 Since wicket 1.4.10 was released this week it follows that a
 wicketstuff-core release is due as well.

 The branch for 1.4.10.1-SNAPSHOT is located here:

 https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicketstuff-core-1.4.10

 And the release tag:

 https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/tags/wicketstuff-core-1.4.10

 The artifacts have been promoted and are available via maven central like
 this:

 dependency
 groupIdorg.wicketstuff/groupId
 artifactIdjasperreports/artifactId
 version1.4.10/version
 /dependency

 Java 5 compatible projects:

 [INFO] Java 5 Modules - Parent ... SUCCESS
 [18.006s]
 [INFO] Wicket-Scala Parent ... SUCCESS
 [3.541s]
 [INFO] Wicket-Scala .. SUCCESS
 [12.034s]
 [INFO] Wicket-Scala Samples .. SUCCESS
 [8.617s]
 [INFO] Wicket-Scala Archetype  SUCCESS
 [4.006s]
 [INFO] Wicket Annotations  SUCCESS
 [11.665s]
 [INFO] JSLibraries ... SUCCESS
 [18.933s]
 [INFO] CalendarViews - Parent  SUCCESS
 [2.356s]
 [INFO] CalendarViews . SUCCESS
 [13.149s]
 [INFO] CalendarViews - Examples .. SUCCESS
 [13.064s]
 [INFO] Client and Server Validation .. SUCCESS
 [8.854s]
 [INFO] Datatable Autocomplete - Parent ... SUCCESS
 [1.834s]
 [INFO] Datatable Autocomplete Common . SUCCESS
 [11.969s]
 [INFO] Datatable Autocomplete  SUCCESS
 [22.470s]
 [INFO] Datatable Autocomplete Examples ... SUCCESS
 [11.275s]
 [INFO] DataTable Autocomplete Test ... SUCCESS
 [9.553s]
 [INFO] GMap2 - Parent  SUCCESS
 [1.629s]
 [INFO] GMap2 . SUCCESS
 [13.844s]
 [INFO] GMap2 - Examples .. SUCCESS
 [23.301s]
 [INFO] Google Charts - Parent  SUCCESS
 [1.321s]
 [INFO] Google Charts . SUCCESS
 [10.642s]
 [INFO] Google Charts - Examples .. SUCCESS
 [9.498s]
 [INFO] InMethod Grid Parent .. SUCCESS
 [2.787s]
 [INFO] InMethod Grid . SUCCESS
 [21.048s]
 [INFO] InMethod Grid Examples  SUCCESS
 [19.089s]
 [INFO] Input Events - Parent . SUCCESS
 [2.222s]
 [INFO] Input Events .. SUCCESS
 [11.158s]
 [INFO] Input Events - Examples ... SUCCESS
 [10.052s]
 [INFO] Misc .. SUCCESS
 [9.961s]
 [INFO] JQuery Integration - Parent ... SUCCESS
 [1.782s]
 [INFO] JQuery Integration  SUCCESS
 [27.317s]
 [INFO] JQuery Integration - Examples . SUCCESS
 [23.535s]
 [INFO] JSR303 - Parent ... SUCCESS
 [1.489s]
 [INFO] JSR303  SUCCESS
 [8.803s]
 [INFO] JSR303 - Examples . SUCCESS
 [13.364s]
 [INFO] Minis - Parent  SUCCESS
 [1.277s]
 [INFO] Minis . SUCCESS
 [14.971s]
 [INFO] Minis - Examples .. SUCCESS
 [11.559s]
 [INFO] ObjectAutoComplete - Parent ... SUCCESS
 [1.526s]
 [INFO] ObjectAutoComplete  SUCCESS
 [9.847s]
 [INFO] ObjectAutoComplete - Examples . SUCCESS
 [15.946s]
 [INFO] Openlayers Integration - Parent ... SUCCESS
 [1.292s]
 [INFO] Openlayers  SUCCESS
 [15.991s]
 [INFO] Openlayers - Proxy  SUCCESS
 [7.649s]
 [INFO] Openlayers - Examples . SUCCESS
 [17.784s]
 [INFO] Wicket Phonebook Example .. SUCCESS
 [22.908s]
 [INFO] Prototype Integration . SUCCESS
 [6.988s]
 [INFO] Scriptaculous Integration - Parent  SUCCESS
 [1.758s]
 [INFO] Scriptaculous

Re: FormComponentPanel and CompoundPropertyModels

2011-01-20 Thread Jan Ferko


Hi,

id of your TextFields should match name of property in Address model.

something like that..

public class Address {
private String address1;
private String address2;
private String city;

//getters
public String getAddress1(){}

...
}

Jan Ferko

On 01/20/2011 12:45 PM, Olivier Croisier wrote:

Hi,

After searching unsuccessfully through the ML archive, I come here to seek
some advice on FormComponentPanels (FCP).

What I want to do is build a small, reusable form component that lets me
edit an Address (address, zipCode, city, country).
I know  that FCP are usually used as a bridge between an external model and
a set of individual components ; but in my case, the internal and external
models are the same.

Below is my current code (adapted from Wicket In Action) ; as you can see,
it is very verbose and redundant.


public class AddressField extends FormComponentPanelAddress  {

 private Address address = new Address();
 private TextFieldString  address1;
 private TextFieldString  address2;
 private TextFieldString  zipCode;
 private TextFieldString  city;
 private CountryCodeDropDownChoice countryCode;

 public AddressField(String id) {
 super(id);
 }

 public AddressField(String id, IModelAddress  model) {
 super(id, model);
 }

 // Constructor block
 {
 add(address1 = new TextFieldString(address1, new
PropertyModelString(address,address1)));
 add(address2 = new TextFieldString(address2, new
PropertyModelString(address, address2)));
 add(zipCode = new TextFieldString(zipCode, new
PropertyModelString(address, zipCode)));
 add(city = new TextFieldString(city, new
PropertyModelString(address, city)));
 add((countryCode = new CountryCodeDropDownChoice(countryCode, new
PropertyModelString(address, countryCode))).setRequired(true));
 }

 @Override
 protected void onBeforeRender() {
 Address modelAddress = getModelObject();
 if (modelAddress != null) {
 address.setAddress1(modelAddress.getAddress1());
 address.setAddress2(modelAddress.getAddress2());
 address.setZipCode(modelAddress.getZipCode());
 address.setCity(modelAddress.getCity());
 address.setCountryCode(modelAddress.getCountryCode());
 }
 if (address.getCountryCode() == null) {
 address.setCountryCode(CountryUtils.CODE_FRANCE);
 }
 super.onBeforeRender();
 }

 @Override
 protected void convertInput() {
 address.setAddress1(address1.getConvertedInput());
 address.setAddress2(address2.getConvertedInput());
 address.setZipCode(zipCode.getConvertedInput());
 address.setCity(city.getConvertedInput());
 address.setCountryCode(countryCode.getConvertedInput());
 setConvertedInput(address);
 }
}



What I would like to achieve is something like this, using a
CompoundPropertyModel :

public class AddressField extends FormComponentPanelAddress  {

 public AddressField(String id) {
 this(id, null);
 }

 public AddressField(String id, IModelAddress  model) {
 super(id, new *CompoundPropertyModel*Address(model));
 }

 // Constructor block
 {
 add(new TextFieldString(address1));
 add(new TextFieldString(address2));
 add(new TextFieldString(zipCode));
 add(new TextFieldString(city));
 add(new
CountryCodeDropDownChoice(countryCode).setRequired(true));
 }
}



But I cannot figure out how to make it work properly (sometimes Wicket tells
me that it cannot find a getter, sometimes that it cannot bind to a null
model...). I must have missed something obvious ?
Thank you for you help !

Olivier




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Question regarding AjaxFormSubmitBehavior

2011-01-20 Thread Daniel Bartl

Have a small question regarding using AjaxFormSubmitBehavoir with nested
forms.

Would like to use it to submit a smaller nested form within a bigger parent
form.

Even though I passed a nested form as a *form that will be submitted*
while calling the following constructor of AjaxFormSubmitBehavoir :
/**
 * Construct.
 *
 * @param form
 *   * form that will be submitted*
 * @param event
 *javascript event this behavior is attached to, like
onclick
 */
public AjaxFormSubmitBehavior(Form? form, String
event) - passing nested form here
{
super(event);
__form = form;

if (form != null)
{
form.setOutputMarkupId(true);
}
}


I noticed that the AjaxFormSubmitBehavior#onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target)
executes the following line first:
getForm().getRootForm().onFormSubmitted();
Why does it still delegate to the root form?

Shouldn't the line be getForm().onFormSubmitted(); so that the nested form
and possibly its children get processed only.


Many thanks!
Daniel

Re: FormComponentPanel and CompoundPropertyModels

2011-01-20 Thread Olivier Croisier

When I use the second solution I gave above, the data I enter in the form is
not saved to the model, and I don't understand why...
I also tried to override convertInput() - still does not work

protected void convertInput() {
 setConvertedInput(getModelObject());
 }




For info, here is how the AddressField is used :

private class CompanyForm extends FormCompany {

 public CompanyForm(String wicketId, IModelCompany model) {
 super(wicketId, new CompoundPropertyModelCompany(model));
 add(new TextFieldString(name));
 add(new AddressField(address));
 ...
 }
 }


With :

public class Company {
 private Address address = new Address();
 }

 public class Address {
 private String address1;
 private String address2;
 private String zipCode;
 private String city;
 private String countryCode;
 }

Re: Submit form from other form onClick

you can submit any form with pure javascript:
document.getElementById('myform').submit();
this will call the respective myForm.onSubmit() method at the server side

at server side you may call directly your methods
e.g.
new Form() {onSubmit() { myService.do(); }}
new AjaxLink() {onClick() { myService.do(); }}
no need to call Wicket methods

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS] 
berlin.br...@primerica.com wrote:

 Is there a way to manually submit a form.  E.g. normally we would have
 action handler methods onSubmit (on a button or a form).

 E.g.

 new AjaxLink() {
   onClick() {
 someOtherForm.submit();
   }
 }

 Berlin Brown

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell

2011-01-20 Thread Giannis Koutsoubos


1.5 port  https://github.com/koutsoub/wicket/tree/component_queuing_1.5
https://github.com/koutsoub/wicket/tree/component_queuing_1.5 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Free-wicket-from-component-hierarchy-hell-tp3027705p3226581.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Resource.getResourceStream() called twice in 1.4.15

2011-01-20 Thread Brad Grier


To follow-up it appears getResourceStream is being called multiple times per
request for other shared resources like generated images (even under
1.4.12). This can be extremely inefficient depending on the amount of work
done. I'm wondering if there's something wrong with my configuration. Any
thoughts?

I'm basically extending Resource and overriding getResourceStream to return
either a generated image (via AbstractResourceStream) or text information
(via StringResourceStream).
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Resource-getResourceStream-called-twice-in-1-4-15-tp3225454p3227876.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: export to excel AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable

2011-01-20 Thread fachhoch


Thanks for your reply , I tried using apache poi call the data provider get
data and create excel .
It works fine no problems.To download this excel I am using fileresource,the
file I provide to this is a temp file my excel util creates this temp file, 
after download I want  to clear the temp file , please suggest me how to
clean  up the temp file? . 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/export-to-excel-AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable-tp3225458p3227903.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: export to excel AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable

Are you using a DownloadLink?

http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/link/DownloadLink.html#setDeleteAfterDownload%28boolean%29



On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:26 AM, fachhoch fachh...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for your reply , I tried using apache poi call the data provider get
 data and create excel .
 It works fine no problems.To download this excel I am using fileresource,the
 file I provide to this is a temp file my excel util creates this temp file,
 after download I want  to clear the temp file , please suggest me how to
 clean  up the temp file? .
 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/export-to-excel-AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable-tp3225458p3227903.html
 Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Resource.getResourceStream() called twice in 1.4.15

we fixed something similar in 1.5 - UrlResourceStream was opening the
underlying connection twice
but your seems to be something else

create a quickstart and attach to Jira
thanks!

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Brad Grier brad.gr...@salusnovus.comwrote:


 To follow-up it appears getResourceStream is being called multiple times
 per
 request for other shared resources like generated images (even under
 1.4.12). This can be extremely inefficient depending on the amount of work
 done. I'm wondering if there's something wrong with my configuration. Any
 thoughts?

 I'm basically extending Resource and overriding getResourceStream to return
 either a generated image (via AbstractResourceStream) or text information
 (via StringResourceStream).
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Resource-getResourceStream-called-twice-in-1-4-15-tp3225454p3227876.html
 Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Martin Makundi 
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:

 Can we bargain about this? Say, also wicket auto ajax enclosure and
 both into 1.4-x


This made me laugh.  What is the other side of the bargain?  What does the
giving party get in return?  :)

Apache is all about consensus.  If the project management committee (who
ultimately has to lead and guide the project) agrees that something is
useful, beneficial, and not detrimental, they allow it to be added by the
committers.  In the case of Wicket, each committer is also on the PMC.  So,
with several committers against this feature being added to 1.4.x (myself
included) and possibly even 1.5, you must persuade them (us) as to why it is
needed.

That being said, this has already been a really long thread (over 100
messages), so you're up against bad odds.

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket?  Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*

Re: Wicket at FOSDEM 2011

2011-01-20 Thread hahdev


Any plan to host in US or Canada?

On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:42 AM, jowen.gsb [via Apache 
Wicket]ml-node+3226705-1948444894-208...@n4.nabble.com wrote:

 I wish I could! A trip to Brussels is outside my training budget. ;) 
 
 -Original Message- 
 From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[hidden email]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 3:44 AM 
 To: [hidden email] 
 Subject: Wicket at FOSDEM 2011 
 
 All, 
 
 I'll be giving a talk about Wicket (and Wicket 1.5) at FOSDEM next 
 february (http://fosdem.org). The conference is free to attend. 
 
 Anyone attending the conference? 
 
 Martijn 
 
 -- 
 Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
 
 - 
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] 
 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] 
 
 
 - 
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] 
 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] 
 
 
 
 If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion 
 below:
 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-at-FOSDEM-2011-tp3224868p3226705.html
 To start a new topic under Users forum, email 
 ml-node+1842947-1796608331-208...@n4.nabble.com 
 To unsubscribe from Users forum, click here.

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-at-FOSDEM-2011-tp3224868p3227995.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4089/4968160827_b742a7448a_z.jpg

..hrm.. putting that aside, did you give it a test drive?

**
Martin

2011/1/20 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com:
 On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Martin Makundi 
 martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:

 Can we bargain about this? Say, also wicket auto ajax enclosure and
 both into 1.4-x


 This made me laugh.  What is the other side of the bargain?  What does the
 giving party get in return?  :)

 Apache is all about consensus.  If the project management committee (who
 ultimately has to lead and guide the project) agrees that something is
 useful, beneficial, and not detrimental, they allow it to be added by the
 committers.  In the case of Wicket, each committer is also on the PMC.  So,
 with several committers against this feature being added to 1.4.x (myself
 included) and possibly even 1.5, you must persuade them (us) as to why it is
 needed.

 That being said, this has already been a really long thread (over 100
 messages), so you're up against bad odds.

 --
 Jeremy Thomerson
 http://wickettraining.com
 *Need a CMS for Wicket?  Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Automatic ajax feedback panel

Wicketopia has something similar called autofeedback.  It's not as
robust, but I believe Igor and I discussed this a while back, so I
decided to make it reusable.

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
 Hi!

 Referring to 
 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/HowTo-inject-FeedbackPanel-td2295430.html

 Here is an initial attempt at a listener solution which will
 automatically add a feedback panel in component hierarchy. it will
 seek for the topmost feedback panel... might not fit for all purposes
 but that is easy to change.


  /**
   * @see 
 org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication#newAjaxRequestTarget(org.apache.wicket.Page)
   */
  @Override
  public AjaxRequestTarget newAjaxRequestTarget(Page page) {
    AjaxRequestTarget ajaxRequestTarget = super.newAjaxRequestTarget(page);
    ajaxRequestTarget.addListener(new
 ErrorComponentAndNearestFeedbackPanelAjaxAutoAdderListener());
    return ajaxRequestTarget;
  }


  public static class TopMostVisibleFeedbackPanelAjaxAutoAdderListener
 implements IListener {
    private IFeedbackMessageFilter feedbackMessageFilter;

    /**
     * @see 
 org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.IListener#onBeforeRespond(java.util.Map,
 org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget)
     */
    @Override
    public void onBeforeRespond(MapString, Component map,
 AjaxRequestTarget target) {
      FeedbackMessages feedbackMessages = Session.get().getFeedbackMessages();

      for (FeedbackMessage feedbackMessage :
 feedbackMessages.messages(feedbackMessageFilter)) {
        if (feedbackMessage.getReporter() != null) {
          Object feedbackPanel = new
 VisitTopMostMarkupContainerPageOrModalWindowHavingVisibleChild(feedbackMessage.getReporter(),
 IFeedback.class).getFoundChild();

          if (feedbackPanel instanceof Component) {
            target.addComponent((Component) feedbackPanel); // Add
 feedbackPanel to the ajax request target
          }
        }
      }
    }

    /**
     * @param feedbackMessageFilter the feedbackMessageFilter to set
     * @return NearestFeedbackPanelAjaxAutoAdderListener
     */
    public TopMostVisibleFeedbackPanelAjaxAutoAdderListener
 setFeedbackMessageFilter(IFeedbackMessageFilter feedbackMessageFilter)
 {
      this.feedbackMessageFilter = feedbackMessageFilter;
      return this;
    }

    /**
     * @return the feedbackMessageFilter
     */
    public IFeedbackMessageFilter getFeedbackMessageFilter() {
      return feedbackMessageFilter;
    }

    /**
     * @see 
 org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.IListener#onAfterRespond(java.util.Map,
 org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.IJavascriptResponse)
     */
    @Override
    public void onAfterRespond(MapString, Component map,
 org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.IJavascriptResponse response)
 {
      // Override if necessary
    }
  }




 public class VisitTopMostMarkupContainerPageOrModalWindowHavingVisibleChild
 implements Component.IVisitorComponent {
  /**  */
  private final Class? childCriteria;
  private Object foundChild;

  /**
   * @param component
   * @param childCriteria
   */
  public 
 VisitTopMostMarkupContainerPageOrModalWindowHavingVisibleChild(Component
 component, Class? childCriteria) {
    this.childCriteria = childCriteria;
    component.visitParents(MarkupContainer.class, this);
  }

  /**
   * @param component
   * @return Object
   */
  public Object component(Component component) {
    MarkupContainer markupContainer = (MarkupContainer) component;
    Object foundChildComponent =
 markupContainer.visitChildren(childCriteria, new
 Component.IVisitorComponent() {
      /**
       * @param childComponent
       * @return Object
       */
      public Object component(Component childComponent) {
        if (true||childComponent.isVisible()) {
          return childComponent;
        }

        return CONTINUE_TRAVERSAL;
      }
    });

    if (childCriteria.isInstance(foundChildComponent)) {
      foundChild = foundChildComponent; // Find topmost
    }

    if (component instanceof ModalWindow) {
      return STOP_TRAVERSAL; // Don't go deeper than ModalWindow
    }

    return CONTINUE_TRAVERSAL;
  }

  /**
   * @return the foundChild
   */
  public Object getFoundChild() {
    return foundChild;
  }
 }


 **
 Martin

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Automatic ajax feedback panel

Note minor typo or residual code at true|| at if
(true||childComponent.isVisible()) {

2011/1/20 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
      public Object component(Component childComponent) {
        if (true||childComponent.isVisible()) {
          return childComponent;
        }

        return CONTINUE_TRAVERSAL;
      }
    });

    if (childCriteria.isInstance(foundChildComponent)) {
      foundChild = foundChildComponent; // Find topmost
    }

    if (component instanceof ModalWindow) {
      return STOP_TRAVERSAL; // Don't go deeper than ModalWindow
    }

    return CONTINUE_TRAVERSAL;
  }

  /**
   * @return the foundChild
   */
  public Object getFoundChild() {
    return foundChild;
  }
 }


 **
 Martin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Added parameters on the end of requests with wicket 1.5

2011-01-20 Thread Andrew Lombardi

I've been converting mysticpaste.com to using Wicket 1.5 with the help of 
Martin Grigorov :) - the source is available here - 
https://github.com/kinabalu/mysticpaste

99% of the way there, and the only remaining issue is that when you paste a URL 
with previous versions of Wicket, I properly get  /view/[paste-id] and that's it

With Wicket 1.5 however, it's appending the pagemap number?  So I get instead 
/view/[paste-id]?1  -- the page is not stateless, has some ajax components on 
it.  But it is important that the URL the users get is just /view/[paste-id]

Here's how I move the user to the view page right now:

params.add(0, Long.toString(pasteItem.getId()));
setResponsePage(ViewPublicPage.class, params);

And here's the mount in Application:

mountPage(/view/${0}/${1}, ViewPublicPage.class);


the ${1} here is for highlighting specific lines

Thanks!


To our success!

Mystic Coders, LLC | Code Magic | www.mysticcoders.com

ANDREW LOMBARDI | and...@mysticcoders.com
ofc: 714-352-0298
fax: 714-782-6024
cell: 714-697-8046
linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewlombardi
twitter: @kinabalu
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/lombardi
fan mystic: http://www.facebook.com/mysticcoders
flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kinabalu

Eco-Tip: Printing e-mails is usually a waste.

--
If this message wasn't addressed to you, don't use, disclose, distribute, print 
or copy any part of this message

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Martin Makundi 
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:

 ..hrm.. putting that aside, did you give it a test drive?


No, I haven't.  Because keeping the two hierarchies in sync has never been a
problem on any project that I worked on.  Typically, the hierarchies are
very shallow anyway because of breaking things into panels and reusable
components.  So, with shallow hierarchies, it really doesn't bring much
benefit to the table.

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket?  Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell

2011-01-20 Thread Jim Pinkham

I'm not a committer, just a normal 1.5 user concerned about bloat.

For what it's worth, I took a few minutes to actually look at the change
(MarkupContainer as you'd expect) and I can see that if you don't use the
new queue methods, the only a memory overhead is the *static* QUEUE (nothing
extra per component!) so I appreciate that performance-wise anyway, it's a
low impact feature you can ignore without penalty.

I'm not thrilled about the conceptual impact of adding a new concern to an
already large class, but the implementation looks quite nice actually, so my
first concern that it might break existing behavior is satisfied.

I still don't think it's necessary, and wonder if it might actually be
counter-productive to have more than one way to learn for new adopters.  If
it goes forward, I don't suppose there's much precedent for taking something
back out, is there?

What a difficult discussion to have over email - I'm in the -1 camp on this
overall, but I think I do appreciate the admirable motive to innovate, so I
hope the committers will give this serious consideration and then chuck it
in the bin where it ...  no, just kidding,  ;)  and then make a fair
decision.

Thanks,
--Jim Pinkham.

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Martin Makundi 
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:

 http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4089/4968160827_b742a7448a_z.jpg

 ..hrm.. putting that aside, did you give it a test drive?

 **
 Martin

 2011/1/20 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com:
  On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Martin Makundi 
  martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
 
  Can we bargain about this? Say, also wicket auto ajax enclosure and
  both into 1.4-x
 
 
  This made me laugh.  What is the other side of the bargain?  What does
 the
  giving party get in return?  :)
 
  Apache is all about consensus.  If the project management committee (who
  ultimately has to lead and guide the project) agrees that something is
  useful, beneficial, and not detrimental, they allow it to be added by the
  committers.  In the case of Wicket, each committer is also on the PMC.
  So,
  with several committers against this feature being added to 1.4.x (myself
  included) and possibly even 1.5, you must persuade them (us) as to why it
 is
  needed.
 
  That being said, this has already been a really long thread (over 100
  messages), so you're up against bad odds.
 
  --
  Jeremy Thomerson
  http://wickettraining.com
  *Need a CMS for Wicket?  Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: session size

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Mihai Toma mihai.t...@asf.ro wrote:

 Hi guys!

 I resolved the problem.

 Here is what I was doing:

 - I have a page, let's say HomePage which extends WebPage.
 - This HomePage add a MenuPanel which extends Panel (add(new MenuPanel()).
 - This MenuPanel add a SubmenuPanel like this menuPanel.add(new
 SubmenuPanel(MenuPanel.this)).

 Because of this reference the whole page was kept in session and the
 session
 grows very fast.

 You can say that I can access the MenuPanel from SubmenuPanel using
 getParent() but let's omit this thing.

 Is it normal for wicket to keep these pages in session if you have this
 type
 of reference?


Every component has a reference to its page.  So, what you described above
should not be a problem.  And since you're using HttpSessionStore, all pages
will be serialized into session anyway.  But pages and components themselves
are not very large.  You need to run a memory analyzer and look for:

1 - references to pages or components from another page hierarchy (don't
pass one component to another page)
2 - (more likely) references to domain objects or, worse yet, services /
daos that are being serialized

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket?  Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*

Re: Automatic ajax feedback panel

Another minor issue, it seems that this was not eager enough when no
components have actual errors (just session.info for example).

To make it more eager:

  public static class TopMostVisibleFeedbackPanelAjaxAutoAdderListener
implements IListener {
private IFeedbackMessageFilter feedbackMessageFilter;

/**
 * @see 
org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.IListener#onBeforeRespond(java.util.Map,
org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget)
 */
@Override
public void onBeforeRespond(MapString, Component map,
AjaxRequestTarget target) {
  FeedbackMessages feedbackMessages = Session.get().getFeedbackMessages();

  ListFeedbackMessage messages =
feedbackMessages.messages(feedbackMessageFilter);

  if (!messages.isEmpty()) {
Object feedbackPanel = null;

for (FeedbackMessage feedbackMessage : messages) {
  Component component = feedbackMessage.getReporter();
  if (component != null) {
feedbackPanel = addFeedbackPanel(target, component);
  }
}

if (feedbackPanel == null) {
  // Some messages still want to become visible, try finding
feedbackpanel from page
  addFeedbackPanel(target, target.getPage());
}
  }
}

/**
 * @param target
 * @param component
 * @return
 */
private Object addFeedbackPanel(AjaxRequestTarget target,
Component component) {
  Object feedbackPanel = new
VisitTopMostMarkupContainerPageOrModalWindowHavingVisibleChild(component,
IFeedback.class).getFoundChild();

  if (feedbackPanel instanceof Component) {
target.addComponent((Component) feedbackPanel); // Add
feedbackPanel to the ajax request target
return feedbackPanel;
  }

  return null;
}

.



Also
  public 
VisitTopMostMarkupContainerPageOrModalWindowHavingVisibleChild(Component
component, Class? childCriteria) {
this.childCriteria = childCriteria;
if ((component.getParent() == null)  (component instanceof
MarkupContainer)) {
  component(component);
} else {
  component.visitParents(MarkupContainer.class, this);
}
  }

**
Martin



2011/1/20 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
 Note minor typo or residual code at true|| at if
 (true||childComponent.isVisible()) {

 2011/1/20 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
      public Object component(Component childComponent) {
        if (true||childComponent.isVisible()) {
          return childComponent;
        }

        return CONTINUE_TRAVERSAL;
      }
    });

    if (childCriteria.isInstance(foundChildComponent)) {
      foundChild = foundChildComponent; // Find topmost
    }

    if (component instanceof ModalWindow) {
      return STOP_TRAVERSAL; // Don't go deeper than ModalWindow
    }

    return CONTINUE_TRAVERSAL;
  }

  /**
   * @return the foundChild
   */
  public Object getFoundChild() {
    return foundChild;
  }
 }


 **
 Martin



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Jim Pinkham pinkh...@gmail.com wrote:

 I still don't think it's necessary, and wonder if it might actually be
 counter-productive to have more than one way to learn for new adopters.  If
 it goes forward, I don't suppose there's much precedent for taking
 something
 back out, is there?


This is the key for me.  I make my living off of teaching Wicket classes.
 New people to Wicket always make mistakes with models and a few other
things.  But after the first morning of class, they almost *never* have a
problem with component hierarchies.

BUT - if we add two ways of building a hierarchy, and one of them is a
little magical, then it gets difficult.

It's too bad we don't have mixins in Java - it would be nice to be able to
have this feature as an entirely separate jar that could be added.  I guess
you could do it now, but rather than calling #queue(compToBeQueued) on your
component, you'd have to use something like ComponentQueue#queue(component,
compToBeQueued).  That could store it in metadata like the current
implementation (if it hasn't changed since the last time I looked at the
code), and then an onbeforerender listener might be able to de-queue
everything.  I'd have no problem with it being an add-on that isn't in the
core Component.


 What a difficult discussion to have over email - I'm in the -1 camp on this
 overall, but I think I do appreciate the admirable motive to innovate, so I
 hope the committers will give this serious consideration and then chuck it
 in the bin where it ...  no, just kidding,  ;)  and then make a fair
 decision.


We never dismiss things off-hand, and will give it consideration.  But we
have to consider both new and advanced users.  I just don't think there's
enough of a use-case requirement for it to justify the confusion that I
*know* it will cause.

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket?  Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Giannis Koutsoubos kouts...@gmail.comwrote:


 1.5 port  https://github.com/koutsoub/wicket/tree/component_queuing_1.5
 https://github.com/koutsoub/wicket/tree/component_queuing_1.5


Thanks, Giannis!


 --
 View this message in context:
 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Free-wicket-from-component-hierarchy-hell-tp3027705p3226581.html
 Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Question regarding AjaxFormSubmitBehavior

the bigger form needs to be processed because what is submitted is the
root form's formtag. however, validation, etc, will probably be
delegated only to the inner form.

-igor

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Daniel Bartl d.ba...@comsysto.com wrote:
 Have a small question regarding using AjaxFormSubmitBehavoir with nested
 forms.

 Would like to use it to submit a smaller nested form within a bigger parent
 form.

 Even though I passed a nested form as a *form that will be submitted*
 while calling the following constructor of AjaxFormSubmitBehavoir :
    /**
     * Construct.
     *
     * @param form
     *           * form that will be submitted*
     * @param event
     *            javascript event this behavior is attached to, like
 onclick
     */
    public AjaxFormSubmitBehavior(Form? form, String
 event)                 - passing nested form here
    {
        super(event);
        __form = form;

        if (form != null)
        {
            form.setOutputMarkupId(true);
        }
    }


 I noticed that the AjaxFormSubmitBehavior#onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target)
 executes the following line first:
 getForm().getRootForm().onFormSubmitted();
 Why does it still delegate to the root form?

 Shouldn't the line be getForm().onFormSubmitted(); so that the nested form
 and possibly its children get processed only.


 Many thanks!
 Daniel


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Martin Makundi 
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:

 http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4089/4968160827_b742a7448a_z.jpg

 ..hrm.. putting that aside, did you give it a test drive?


Martin, I know you started the thread about this idea last time.
I'm wondering do you work together with Giannis and do you use the 1.4 in
production ?

In the beginning I was also against this idea but then I saw Igor's work and
I started believing in it.
Once we release 1.5 final I think we can introduce this in 1.5.{1,2}.


 **
 Martin

 2011/1/20 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com:
  On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Martin Makundi 
  martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
 
  Can we bargain about this? Say, also wicket auto ajax enclosure and
  both into 1.4-x
 
 
  This made me laugh.  What is the other side of the bargain?  What does
 the
  giving party get in return?  :)
 
  Apache is all about consensus.  If the project management committee (who
  ultimately has to lead and guide the project) agrees that something is
  useful, beneficial, and not detrimental, they allow it to be added by the
  committers.  In the case of Wicket, each committer is also on the PMC.
  So,
  with several committers against this feature being added to 1.4.x (myself
  included) and possibly even 1.5, you must persuade them (us) as to why it
 is
  needed.
 
  That being said, this has already been a really long thread (over 100
  messages), so you're up against bad odds.
 
  --
  Jeremy Thomerson
  http://wickettraining.com
  *Need a CMS for Wicket?  Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

SwramWebApplication and session

2011-01-20 Thread jussi isokangas

Hi,

My application extends SwramWebApplication. Session doesn't accpet that for
paramater. I need to use session for ShoppingCart.
How to solve it?

Regards Jussi

DropDown options with labels and checkboxes

2011-01-20 Thread Alec Swan

Hello,

Is there a way to build a DropDown list each option of which has a label and
a checkbox. The idea is that the user will use this component to assign
tags. Very similar to what Google labels dropdown. It would be even better
if somebody could point an existing component that does this :)

Thanks,

Alec

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell

Quote from Igor
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Free-wicket-from-component-hierarchy-hell-td3027705i160.html

If in doubt, there is always
getMarkupSettings().setAllowComponentAutoHierarchy(false);
there will be no such method.

+1 for not making this part of core.

..hrm.. putting that aside, did you give it a test drive?

Martin, I know you started the thread about this idea last time.
I'm wondering do you work together with Giannis and do you use the 1.4 in
production ?

Giannis is in our team yes but Giannis forked this mostly with help from Igor.

Yes, we use 1.4 in production.

In the beginning I was also against this idea but then I saw Igor's work and
I started believing in it.
Once we release 1.5 final I think we can introduce this in 1.5.{1,2}.

Meanwhile we can test-drive it in 1.4.

**
Martin

2011/1/20 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:

Can we bargain about this? Say, also wicket auto ajax enclosure and
both into 1.4-x

This made me laugh. What is the other side of the bargain? What does
the
giving party get in return? :)

Apache is all about consensus. If the project management committee (who
ultimately has to lead and guide the project) agrees that something is
useful, beneficial, and not detrimental, they allow it to be added by the
committers. In the case of Wicket, each committer is also on the PMC.
So,
with several committers against this feature being added to 1.4.x (myself
included) and possibly even 1.5, you must persuade them (us) as to why it
is
needed.

That being said, this has already been a really long thread (over 100
messages), so you're up against bad odds.

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: DropDown options with labels and checkboxes

sure, just use javascript :)

-igor

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Alec Swan alecs...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello,

 Is there a way to build a DropDown list each option of which has a label and
 a checkbox. The idea is that the user will use this component to assign
 tags. Very similar to what Google labels dropdown. It would be even better
 if somebody could point an existing component that does this :)

 Thanks,

 Alec


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Added parameters on the end of requests with wicket 1.5

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Andrew Lombardi and...@mysticcoders.comwrote:

 I've been converting mysticpaste.com to using Wicket 1.5 with the help of
 Martin Grigorov :) - the source is available here -
 https://github.com/kinabalu/mysticpaste

 99% of the way there, and the only remaining issue is that when you paste a
 URL with previous versions of Wicket, I properly get  /view/[paste-id] and
 that's it

 With Wicket 1.5 however, it's appending the pagemap number?  So I get
 instead /view/[paste-id]?1  -- the page is not stateless, has some ajax
 components on it.  But it is important that the URL the users get is just
 /view/[paste-id]

 Here's how I move the user to the view page right now:

params.add(0, Long.toString(pasteItem.getId()));
setResponsePage(ViewPublicPage.class, params);

 And here's the mount in Application:

mountPage(/view/${0}/${1}, ViewPublicPage.class);


 the ${1} here is for highlighting specific lines

 Thanks!

 A brief conversation in IRC:

(09:05:43 PM) ivaynberg: no way to get rid of ?1 for now
(09:05:49 PM) ivaynberg: thats the page id i think
(09:06:04 PM) martin-g: it is
(09:06:07 PM) ivaynberg: urls work like hybrid ones in 1.4
(09:06:19 PM) ivaynberg: its not pretty, but its safe to paste around
(09:06:46 PM) ivaynberg: we do that so ajax works properly
(09:06:53 PM) ivaynberg: (doesnt lose state when user presses refresh)

To have the clean URL your page has to be stateless.
In ViewPastePage you have two stateful components: Form and AjaxLink
Replacing them with their stateless versions: StatessForm and StatelessLink
leads to the following link when the user clicks Mark as Spam link:
http://localhost:18081/view/4/?0-1.ILinkListener-markAbuseLink

Choose which one you like better ;-)


 To our success!

 Mystic Coders, LLC | Code Magic | www.mysticcoders.com

 ANDREW LOMBARDI | and...@mysticcoders.com
 ofc: 714-352-0298
 fax: 714-782-6024
 cell: 714-697-8046
 linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewlombardi
 twitter: @kinabalu
 facebook: http://www.facebook.com/lombardi
 fan mystic: http://www.facebook.com/mysticcoders
 flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kinabalu

 Eco-Tip: Printing e-mails is usually a waste.

 --
 If this message wasn't addressed to you, don't use, disclose, distribute,
 print or copy any part of this message

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:

Quote from Igor

http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Free-wicket-from-component-hierarchy-hell-td3027705i160.html

If in doubt, there is always
getMarkupSettings().setAllowComponentAutoHierarchy(false);
there will be no such method.

+1 for not making this part of core.

..hrm.. putting that aside, did you give it a test drive?

Martin, I know you started the thread about this idea last time.
I'm wondering do you work together with Giannis and do you use the 1.4 in
production ?

Giannis is in our team yes but Giannis forked this mostly with help from
Igor.

Yes, we use 1.4 in production.

I meant: do you use 1.4 + the patch in production ?

In the beginning I was also against this idea but then I saw Igor's work
and
I started believing in it.
Once we release 1.5 final I think we can introduce this in 1.5.{1,2}.

Meanwhile we can test-drive it in 1.4.

Please do and report ;-)

**
Martin

2011/1/20 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:

Can we bargain about this? Say, also wicket auto ajax enclosure and
both into 1.4-x

This made me laugh. What is the other side of the bargain? What
does
the
giving party get in return? :)

Apache is all about consensus. If the project management committee
(who
ultimately has to lead and guide the project) agrees that something is
useful, beneficial, and not detrimental, they allow it to be added by
the
committers. In the case of Wicket, each committer is also on the PMC.
So,
with several committers against this feature being added to 1.4.x
(myself
included) and possibly even 1.5, you must persuade them (us) as to why
it
is
needed.

That being said, this has already been a really long thread (over 100
messages), so you're up against bad odds.

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell

http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Free-wicket-from-component-hierarchy-hell-td3027705i160.html

If in doubt, there is always
getMarkupSettings().setAllowComponentAutoHierarchy(false);
there will be no such method.

+1 for not making this part of core.

I mean for yes making part of core ;) Duh.. it' s getting too late.

Giannis is in our team yes but Giannis forked this mostly with help from
Igor.

Yes, we use 1.4 in production.

I meant: do you use 1.4 + the patch in production ?

We have various projects, some yes some no.

The largest production I am responsible for is stuck with
wicket.version1.4.9/wicket.version because some of the later
releases have not been monotonically improving. So we are stuck with
some patches etc. and we haven't had time to refactor to 1.4.x

I am having nightmares about future refactorings to 1.5 or 1.6 so I am
investing as much as I can on 1.4 ;)

Meanwhile we can test-drive it in 1.4.

Please do and report ;-)

Until now, only happy news :)

**
Martin

2011/1/20 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:

Can we bargain about this? Say, also wicket auto ajax enclosure and
both into 1.4-x

This made me laugh. What is the other side of the bargain? What
does
the
giving party get in return? :)

Apache is all about consensus. If the project management committee
(who
ultimately has to lead and guide the project) agrees that something is
useful, beneficial, and not detrimental, they allow it to be added by
the
committers. In the case of Wicket, each committer is also on the PMC.
So,
with several committers against this feature being added to 1.4.x
(myself
included) and possibly even 1.5, you must persuade them (us) as to why
it
is
needed.

That being said, this has already been a really long thread (over 100
messages), so you're up against bad odds.

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: How to do setResponsePage after alert message pressed ok?

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:42 AM, rolandpeng rolandp...@cht.com.tw wrote:


 Hi,
   After doing insert or update,I'd like to show some alert message,such as
 insert succeed. or update succeed.,and then do setResponsePage() to data
 listing page.
   But I wonder how to do it under wicket. Would anyone give me some hint?
 Thank you!

 use case: insert or update--alert message--auto redirect to data listing
 page.

 Roland.
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-do-setResponsePage-after-alert-message-pressed-ok-tp3225482p3225482.html
 Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


An alert is client side.  A setResponsePage is server side.  So, you can:

1 - create a response that is JS - it alerts, then does a client side
redirect
2 - not use an alert (which is generally a bad UI decision), and instead use
a feedback panel to show the message on the next page.  As a tip, you can
add a feedback panel to the top of your base page so that it automatically
is present in all pages.  then use getSession().info(Your foo was
completed) and call setResponsePage(YourNextPageClass.class) and it will
appear in the FBP

-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket?  Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*

RE: Submit form from other form onClick

2011-01-20 Thread Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS]

This works, thanks.

Another similar question based on your question.

Can I use an ajax form submit, maybe using a wicket javascript utility.

I guess I could use jquery but  does wicket have something available.

E.g. as opposed to document.forms[xxx].submit().  Is there some generic
ajax submit I could use.

...
this.add(new AjaxLinkObject(nextLink) {


@Override
public void onClick(final AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
// Find the dynamic form on the page. 
final Object objAtStopTraversal =
HomePage.this.visitChildren(new FindFormVisitor());
if (objAtStopTraversal instanceof Form?) {
// Form found, invoke javascript submit
final Form? form = (Form?)
objAtStopTraversal; 
target.appendJavascript(String.format(try {
document.forms['%s'].submit(); } catch(err) { if (window.console !=
undefined) { console.log(err); } }, form.getMarkupId()));
}
}
} );

-Original Message-
From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] 
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:01 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Submit form from other form onClick

you can submit any form with pure javascript:
document.getElementById('myform').submit();
this will call the respective myForm.onSubmit() method at the server
side

at server side you may call directly your methods e.g.
new Form() {onSubmit() { myService.do(); }} new AjaxLink() {onClick() {
myService.do(); }} no need to call Wicket methods

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS] 
berlin.br...@primerica.com wrote:

 Is there a way to manually submit a form.  E.g. normally we would have

 action handler methods onSubmit (on a button or a form).

 E.g.

 new AjaxLink() {
   onClick() {
 someOtherForm.submit();
   }
 }

 Berlin Brown



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Added parameters on the end of requests with wicket 1.5

the onclick of the stateless link can redirect back to the
bookmarkable version, which will clean up the url

-igor

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Andrew Lombardi 
 and...@mysticcoders.comwrote:

 I've been converting mysticpaste.com to using Wicket 1.5 with the help of
 Martin Grigorov :) - the source is available here -
 https://github.com/kinabalu/mysticpaste

 99% of the way there, and the only remaining issue is that when you paste a
 URL with previous versions of Wicket, I properly get  /view/[paste-id] and
 that's it

 With Wicket 1.5 however, it's appending the pagemap number?  So I get
 instead /view/[paste-id]?1  -- the page is not stateless, has some ajax
 components on it.  But it is important that the URL the users get is just
 /view/[paste-id]

 Here's how I move the user to the view page right now:

                    params.add(0, Long.toString(pasteItem.getId()));
                    setResponsePage(ViewPublicPage.class, params);

 And here's the mount in Application:

        mountPage(/view/${0}/${1}, ViewPublicPage.class);


 the ${1} here is for highlighting specific lines

 Thanks!

 A brief conversation in IRC:

 (09:05:43 PM) ivaynberg: no way to get rid of ?1 for now
 (09:05:49 PM) ivaynberg: thats the page id i think
 (09:06:04 PM) martin-g: it is
 (09:06:07 PM) ivaynberg: urls work like hybrid ones in 1.4
 (09:06:19 PM) ivaynberg: its not pretty, but its safe to paste around
 (09:06:46 PM) ivaynberg: we do that so ajax works properly
 (09:06:53 PM) ivaynberg: (doesnt lose state when user presses refresh)

 To have the clean URL your page has to be stateless.
 In ViewPastePage you have two stateful components: Form and AjaxLink
 Replacing them with their stateless versions: StatessForm and StatelessLink
 leads to the following link when the user clicks Mark as Spam link:
 http://localhost:18081/view/4/?0-1.ILinkListener-markAbuseLink

 Choose which one you like better ;-)


 To our success!

 Mystic Coders, LLC | Code Magic | www.mysticcoders.com

 ANDREW LOMBARDI | and...@mysticcoders.com
 ofc: 714-352-0298
 fax: 714-782-6024
 cell: 714-697-8046
 linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewlombardi
 twitter: @kinabalu
 facebook: http://www.facebook.com/lombardi
 fan mystic: http://www.facebook.com/mysticcoders
 flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kinabalu

 Eco-Tip: Printing e-mails is usually a waste.

 --
 If this message wasn't addressed to you, don't use, disclose, distribute,
 print or copy any part of this message




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Resource.getResourceStream() called twice in 1.4.15

2011-01-20 Thread Brad Grier


Thanks. I submitted an issue in Jira with a quickstart .

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3357
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Resource-getResourceStream-called-twice-in-1-4-15-tp3225454p3228511.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Added parameters on the end of requests with wicket 1.5

2011-01-20 Thread Andrew Lombardi

Okay, got it.  I'll dump the ajax on that page, and convert it over.  Thanks!

On Jan 20, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:

 the onclick of the stateless link can redirect back to the
 bookmarkable version, which will clean up the url
 
 -igor
 
 On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org 
 wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Andrew Lombardi 
 and...@mysticcoders.comwrote:
 
 I've been converting mysticpaste.com to using Wicket 1.5 with the help of
 Martin Grigorov :) - the source is available here -
 https://github.com/kinabalu/mysticpaste
 
 99% of the way there, and the only remaining issue is that when you paste a
 URL with previous versions of Wicket, I properly get  /view/[paste-id] and
 that's it
 
 With Wicket 1.5 however, it's appending the pagemap number?  So I get
 instead /view/[paste-id]?1  -- the page is not stateless, has some ajax
 components on it.  But it is important that the URL the users get is just
 /view/[paste-id]
 
 Here's how I move the user to the view page right now:
 
params.add(0, Long.toString(pasteItem.getId()));
setResponsePage(ViewPublicPage.class, params);
 
 And here's the mount in Application:
 
mountPage(/view/${0}/${1}, ViewPublicPage.class);
 
 
 the ${1} here is for highlighting specific lines
 
 Thanks!
 
 A brief conversation in IRC:
 
 (09:05:43 PM) ivaynberg: no way to get rid of ?1 for now
 (09:05:49 PM) ivaynberg: thats the page id i think
 (09:06:04 PM) martin-g: it is
 (09:06:07 PM) ivaynberg: urls work like hybrid ones in 1.4
 (09:06:19 PM) ivaynberg: its not pretty, but its safe to paste around
 (09:06:46 PM) ivaynberg: we do that so ajax works properly
 (09:06:53 PM) ivaynberg: (doesnt lose state when user presses refresh)
 
 To have the clean URL your page has to be stateless.
 In ViewPastePage you have two stateful components: Form and AjaxLink
 Replacing them with their stateless versions: StatessForm and StatelessLink
 leads to the following link when the user clicks Mark as Spam link:
 http://localhost:18081/view/4/?0-1.ILinkListener-markAbuseLink
 
 Choose which one you like better ;-)
 
 
 To our success!
 
 Mystic Coders, LLC | Code Magic | www.mysticcoders.com
 
 ANDREW LOMBARDI | and...@mysticcoders.com
 ofc: 714-352-0298
 fax: 714-782-6024
 cell: 714-697-8046
 linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewlombardi
 twitter: @kinabalu
 facebook: http://www.facebook.com/lombardi
 fan mystic: http://www.facebook.com/mysticcoders
 flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kinabalu
 
 Eco-Tip: Printing e-mails is usually a waste.
 
 --
 If this message wasn't addressed to you, don't use, disclose, distribute,
 print or copy any part of this message
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 


To our success!

Mystic Coders, LLC | Code Magic | www.mysticcoders.com

ANDREW LOMBARDI | and...@mysticcoders.com
ofc: 714-352-0298
fax: 714-782-6024
cell: 714-697-8046
linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewlombardi
twitter: @kinabalu
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/lombardi
fan mystic: http://www.facebook.com/mysticcoders
flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kinabalu

Eco-Tip: Printing e-mails is usually a waste.

--
If this message wasn't addressed to you, don't use, disclose, distribute, print 
or copy any part of this message

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:

 The largest production I am responsible for is stuck with
 wicket.version1.4.9/wicket.version  because some of the later
 releases have not been monotonically improving. So we are stuck with
 some patches etc. and we haven't had time to refactor to 1.4.x


We're stuck on 1.4.9, too, because the markup and hierarchy changed
for DataTable and we're using that everywhere with a custom subclass
with its own markup.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Added parameters on the end of requests with wicket 1.5

2011-01-20 Thread Andrew Lombardi

Url's look great now /view/[paste-id]

Next issue.  We have 2 links, one for Raw and the other for Download which 
suffix the URL with /text and /download respectively like so:

/view/[paste-id]/text
/view/[paste-id]/download

in 1.4 I redirected to the SharedResourceReference and all worked dandy.  
martin-g helped convert this to the 1.5 way, and the links don't seem to do 
anything anymore, and if you go to the URL directly, it tries to render the 
page instead of redirect to the resource straight away.  Here's the code at the 
top of the ctor:

if (params.get(1).toString().equals(text)) {
getRequestCycle().scheduleRequestHandlerAfterCurrent(new 
ResourceReferenceRequestHandler(new 
SharedResourceReference(textPasteResource)));
return;
} else if (params.get(1).toString().equals(download)) {
getRequestCycle().scheduleRequestHandlerAfterCurrent(new 
ResourceReferenceRequestHandler(new 
SharedResourceReference(downloadAsTextPasteResource)));
return;
}

I understand why Wicket is trying to render the page since I'm effectively 
redirecting there, even if in 1.4 it worked.

Is there a way to register a handler for URL's that suffix /text and /download 
to be served by the resources directly?  

On Jan 20, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Andrew Lombardi wrote:

 Okay, got it.  I'll dump the ajax on that page, and convert it over.  Thanks!
 
 On Jan 20, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
 
 the onclick of the stateless link can redirect back to the
 bookmarkable version, which will clean up the url
 
 -igor
 
 On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org 
 wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Andrew Lombardi 
 and...@mysticcoders.comwrote:
 
 I've been converting mysticpaste.com to using Wicket 1.5 with the help of
 Martin Grigorov :) - the source is available here -
 https://github.com/kinabalu/mysticpaste
 
 99% of the way there, and the only remaining issue is that when you paste a
 URL with previous versions of Wicket, I properly get  /view/[paste-id] and
 that's it
 
 With Wicket 1.5 however, it's appending the pagemap number?  So I get
 instead /view/[paste-id]?1  -- the page is not stateless, has some ajax
 components on it.  But it is important that the URL the users get is just
 /view/[paste-id]
 
 Here's how I move the user to the view page right now:
 
params.add(0, Long.toString(pasteItem.getId()));
setResponsePage(ViewPublicPage.class, params);
 
 And here's the mount in Application:
 
mountPage(/view/${0}/${1}, ViewPublicPage.class);
 
 
 the ${1} here is for highlighting specific lines
 
 Thanks!
 
 A brief conversation in IRC:
 
 (09:05:43 PM) ivaynberg: no way to get rid of ?1 for now
 (09:05:49 PM) ivaynberg: thats the page id i think
 (09:06:04 PM) martin-g: it is
 (09:06:07 PM) ivaynberg: urls work like hybrid ones in 1.4
 (09:06:19 PM) ivaynberg: its not pretty, but its safe to paste around
 (09:06:46 PM) ivaynberg: we do that so ajax works properly
 (09:06:53 PM) ivaynberg: (doesnt lose state when user presses refresh)
 
 To have the clean URL your page has to be stateless.
 In ViewPastePage you have two stateful components: Form and AjaxLink
 Replacing them with their stateless versions: StatessForm and StatelessLink
 leads to the following link when the user clicks Mark as Spam link:
 http://localhost:18081/view/4/?0-1.ILinkListener-markAbuseLink
 
 Choose which one you like better ;-)
 
 
 To our success!
 
 Mystic Coders, LLC | Code Magic | www.mysticcoders.com
 
 ANDREW LOMBARDI | and...@mysticcoders.com
 ofc: 714-352-0298
 fax: 714-782-6024
 cell: 714-697-8046
 linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewlombardi
 twitter: @kinabalu
 facebook: http://www.facebook.com/lombardi
 fan mystic: http://www.facebook.com/mysticcoders
 flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kinabalu
 
 Eco-Tip: Printing e-mails is usually a waste.
 
 --
 If this message wasn't addressed to you, don't use, disclose, distribute,
 print or copy any part of this message
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
 To our success!
 
 Mystic Coders, LLC | Code Magic | www.mysticcoders.com
 
 ANDREW LOMBARDI | and...@mysticcoders.com
 ofc: 714-352-0298
 fax: 714-782-6024
 cell: 714-697-8046
 linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewlombardi
 twitter: @kinabalu
 facebook: http://www.facebook.com/lombardi
 fan mystic: http://www.facebook.com/mysticcoders
 flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kinabalu
 
 Eco-Tip: Printing e-mails is usually a waste.
 
 --
 If this message wasn't addressed to you, don't use, disclose, distribute, 
 print or copy any part of this message
 


To our success!

Mystic Coders, LLC | Code Magic | www.mysticcoders.com

ANDREW LOMBARDI | and...@mysticcoders.com
ofc:

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell

so you only have one place to fix it in

-igor

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:43 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Martin Makundi
 martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:

 The largest production I am responsible for is stuck with
 wicket.version1.4.9/wicket.version  because some of the later
 releases have not been monotonically improving. So we are stuck with
 some patches etc. and we haven't had time to refactor to 1.4.x


 We're stuck on 1.4.9, too, because the markup and hierarchy changed
 for DataTable and we're using that everywhere with a custom subclass
 with its own markup.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Added parameters on the end of requests with wicket 1.5

you should use replacehandler() instead of scheduleaftercurrent, since
current will render the page.

but to do it in 1.5 way you would mount a handler on
/view/${pasteid}/download and one on /view/${pasteid}/text and
implement streaming there instead of using the page as a switchboard.

-igor

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Andrew Lombardi
and...@mysticcoders.com wrote:
 Url's look great now /view/[paste-id]

 Next issue.  We have 2 links, one for Raw and the other for Download which 
 suffix the URL with /text and /download respectively like so:

 /view/[paste-id]/text
 /view/[paste-id]/download

 in 1.4 I redirected to the SharedResourceReference and all worked dandy.  
 martin-g helped convert this to the 1.5 way, and the links don't seem to do 
 anything anymore, and if you go to the URL directly, it tries to render the 
 page instead of redirect to the resource straight away.  Here's the code at 
 the top of the ctor:

            if (params.get(1).toString().equals(text)) {
                getRequestCycle().scheduleRequestHandlerAfterCurrent(new 
 ResourceReferenceRequestHandler(new 
 SharedResourceReference(textPasteResource)));
                return;
            } else if (params.get(1).toString().equals(download)) {
                getRequestCycle().scheduleRequestHandlerAfterCurrent(new 
 ResourceReferenceRequestHandler(new 
 SharedResourceReference(downloadAsTextPasteResource)));
                return;
            }

 I understand why Wicket is trying to render the page since I'm effectively 
 redirecting there, even if in 1.4 it worked.

 Is there a way to register a handler for URL's that suffix /text and 
 /download to be served by the resources directly?

 On Jan 20, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Andrew Lombardi wrote:

 Okay, got it.  I'll dump the ajax on that page, and convert it over.  Thanks!

 On Jan 20, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:

 the onclick of the stateless link can redirect back to the
 bookmarkable version, which will clean up the url

 -igor

 On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org 
 wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Andrew Lombardi 
 and...@mysticcoders.comwrote:

 I've been converting mysticpaste.com to using Wicket 1.5 with the help of
 Martin Grigorov :) - the source is available here -
 https://github.com/kinabalu/mysticpaste

 99% of the way there, and the only remaining issue is that when you paste 
 a
 URL with previous versions of Wicket, I properly get  /view/[paste-id] and
 that's it

 With Wicket 1.5 however, it's appending the pagemap number?  So I get
 instead /view/[paste-id]?1  -- the page is not stateless, has some ajax
 components on it.  But it is important that the URL the users get is just
 /view/[paste-id]

 Here's how I move the user to the view page right now:

                    params.add(0, Long.toString(pasteItem.getId()));
                    setResponsePage(ViewPublicPage.class, params);

 And here's the mount in Application:

        mountPage(/view/${0}/${1}, ViewPublicPage.class);


 the ${1} here is for highlighting specific lines

 Thanks!

 A brief conversation in IRC:

 (09:05:43 PM) ivaynberg: no way to get rid of ?1 for now
 (09:05:49 PM) ivaynberg: thats the page id i think
 (09:06:04 PM) martin-g: it is
 (09:06:07 PM) ivaynberg: urls work like hybrid ones in 1.4
 (09:06:19 PM) ivaynberg: its not pretty, but its safe to paste around
 (09:06:46 PM) ivaynberg: we do that so ajax works properly
 (09:06:53 PM) ivaynberg: (doesnt lose state when user presses refresh)

 To have the clean URL your page has to be stateless.
 In ViewPastePage you have two stateful components: Form and AjaxLink
 Replacing them with their stateless versions: StatessForm and StatelessLink
 leads to the following link when the user clicks Mark as Spam link:
 http://localhost:18081/view/4/?0-1.ILinkListener-markAbuseLink

 Choose which one you like better ;-)


 To our success!

 Mystic Coders, LLC | Code Magic | www.mysticcoders.com

 ANDREW LOMBARDI | and...@mysticcoders.com
 ofc: 714-352-0298
 fax: 714-782-6024
 cell: 714-697-8046
 linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewlombardi
 twitter: @kinabalu
 facebook: http://www.facebook.com/lombardi
 fan mystic: http://www.facebook.com/mysticcoders
 flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kinabalu

 Eco-Tip: Printing e-mails is usually a waste.

 --
 If this message wasn't addressed to you, don't use, disclose, distribute,
 print or copy any part of this message




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 To our success!

 Mystic Coders, LLC | Code Magic | www.mysticcoders.com

 ANDREW LOMBARDI | and...@mysticcoders.com
 ofc: 714-352-0298
 fax: 714-782-6024
 cell: 714-697-8046
 linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewlombardi
 twitter: @kinabalu
 facebook: http://www.facebook.com/lombardi
 fan mystic:

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell

I'm actually looking at it now.  The markup changed between 1.4.5 and
1.4.6, so there must be some other reason that I stayed with 1.4.9
(assuming laziness wasn't it). :)


On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
 so you only have one place to fix it in

 -igor

 On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:43 PM, James Carman
 ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Martin Makundi
 martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:

 The largest production I am responsible for is stuck with
 wicket.version1.4.9/wicket.version  because some of the later
 releases have not been monotonically improving. So we are stuck with
 some patches etc. and we haven't had time to refactor to 1.4.x


 We're stuck on 1.4.9, too, because the markup and hierarchy changed
 for DataTable and we're using that everywhere with a custom subclass
 with its own markup.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Question regarding AjaxFormSubmitBehavior

2011-01-20 Thread jcgarciam


Adding to Igor's comment, remember that nested form is not allow in HTML
spec per se, so what wicket is doing a trick where the root form is submit
but only elements of nested form (which get transform in DIV tag) are
processed

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Igor Vaynberg-2 [via Apache Wicket] 
ml-node+3228304-1818027643-65...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b3228304-1818027643-65...@n4.nabble.com
 wrote:

 the bigger form needs to be processed because what is submitted is the
 root form's formtag. however, validation, etc, will probably be
 delegated only to the inner form.

 -igor

 On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Daniel Bartl [hidden 
 email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3228304i=0
 wrote:

  Have a small question regarding using AjaxFormSubmitBehavoir with nested
  forms.
 
  Would like to use it to submit a smaller nested form within a bigger
 parent
  form.
 
  Even though I passed a nested form as a *form that will be submitted*
  while calling the following constructor of AjaxFormSubmitBehavoir :
 /**
  * Construct.
  *
  * @param form
  *   * form that will be submitted*
  * @param event
  *javascript event this behavior is attached to, like
  onclick
  */
 public AjaxFormSubmitBehavior(Form? form, String
  event) - passing nested form here
 {
 super(event);
 __form = form;
 
 if (form != null)
 {
 form.setOutputMarkupId(true);
 }
 }
 
 
  I noticed that the AjaxFormSubmitBehavior#onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget
 target)
  executes the following line first:
  getForm().getRootForm().onFormSubmitted();
  Why does it still delegate to the root form?
 
  Shouldn't the line be getForm().onFormSubmitted(); so that the nested
 form
  and possibly its children get processed only.
 
 
  Many thanks!
  Daniel
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
 email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3228304i=1
 For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
 email]http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=3228304i=2



 --
  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
 below:

 http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-regarding-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-tp3227451p3228304.html
  To start a new topic under Apache Wicket, email
 ml-node+1842946-398011874-65...@n4.nabble.comml-node%2b1842946-398011874-65...@n4.nabble.com
 To unsubscribe from Apache Wicket, click 
 herehttp://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=1842946code=amNnYXJjaWFtQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwxODQyOTQ2fDEyNTYxMzc3ODY=.





-- 
Sincerely,
JC (http://www.linkedin.com/in/jcgarciam)
--Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.--

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Question-regarding-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-tp3227451p3228728.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Added parameters on the end of requests with wicket 1.5

2011-01-20 Thread and...@mysticcoders.com

Awesome thanks Igor.

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:

 you should use replacehandler() instead of scheduleaftercurrent, since
 current will render the page.

 but to do it in 1.5 way you would mount a handler on
 /view/${pasteid}/download and one on /view/${pasteid}/text and
 implement streaming there instead of using the page as a switchboard.

 -igor

 On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Andrew Lombardi
 and...@mysticcoders.com wrote:
  Url's look great now /view/[paste-id]
 
  Next issue.  We have 2 links, one for Raw and the other for Download
 which suffix the URL with /text and /download respectively like so:
 
  /view/[paste-id]/text
  /view/[paste-id]/download
 
  in 1.4 I redirected to the SharedResourceReference and all worked dandy.
  martin-g helped convert this to the 1.5 way, and the links don't seem to do
 anything anymore, and if you go to the URL directly, it tries to render the
 page instead of redirect to the resource straight away.  Here's the code at
 the top of the ctor:
 
 if (params.get(1).toString().equals(text)) {
 getRequestCycle().scheduleRequestHandlerAfterCurrent(new
 ResourceReferenceRequestHandler(new
 SharedResourceReference(textPasteResource)));
 return;
 } else if (params.get(1).toString().equals(download)) {
 getRequestCycle().scheduleRequestHandlerAfterCurrent(new
 ResourceReferenceRequestHandler(new
 SharedResourceReference(downloadAsTextPasteResource)));
 return;
 }
 
  I understand why Wicket is trying to render the page since I'm
 effectively redirecting there, even if in 1.4 it worked.
 
  Is there a way to register a handler for URL's that suffix /text and
 /download to be served by the resources directly?
 
  On Jan 20, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Andrew Lombardi wrote:
 
  Okay, got it.  I'll dump the ajax on that page, and convert it over.
  Thanks!
 
  On Jan 20, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
 
  the onclick of the stateless link can redirect back to the
  bookmarkable version, which will clean up the url
 
  -igor
 
  On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Martin Grigorov 
 mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
  On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Andrew Lombardi 
 and...@mysticcoders.comwrote:
 
  I've been converting mysticpaste.com to using Wicket 1.5 with the
 help of
  Martin Grigorov :) - the source is available here -
  https://github.com/kinabalu/mysticpaste
 
  99% of the way there, and the only remaining issue is that when you
 paste a
  URL with previous versions of Wicket, I properly get
  /view/[paste-id] and
  that's it
 
  With Wicket 1.5 however, it's appending the pagemap number?  So I get
  instead /view/[paste-id]?1  -- the page is not stateless, has some
 ajax
  components on it.  But it is important that the URL the users get is
 just
  /view/[paste-id]
 
  Here's how I move the user to the view page right now:
 
 params.add(0, Long.toString(pasteItem.getId()));
 setResponsePage(ViewPublicPage.class, params);
 
  And here's the mount in Application:
 
 mountPage(/view/${0}/${1}, ViewPublicPage.class);
 
 
  the ${1} here is for highlighting specific lines
 
  Thanks!
 
  A brief conversation in IRC:
 
  (09:05:43 PM) ivaynberg: no way to get rid of ?1 for now
  (09:05:49 PM) ivaynberg: thats the page id i think
  (09:06:04 PM) martin-g: it is
  (09:06:07 PM) ivaynberg: urls work like hybrid ones in 1.4
  (09:06:19 PM) ivaynberg: its not pretty, but its safe to paste around
  (09:06:46 PM) ivaynberg: we do that so ajax works properly
  (09:06:53 PM) ivaynberg: (doesnt lose state when user presses refresh)
 
  To have the clean URL your page has to be stateless.
  In ViewPastePage you have two stateful components: Form and AjaxLink
  Replacing them with their stateless versions: StatessForm and
 StatelessLink
  leads to the following link when the user clicks Mark as Spam link:
  http://localhost:18081/view/4/?0-1.ILinkListener-markAbuseLink
 
  Choose which one you like better ;-)
 
 
  To our success!
 
  Mystic Coders, LLC | Code Magic | www.mysticcoders.com
 
  ANDREW LOMBARDI | and...@mysticcoders.com
  ofc: 714-352-0298
  fax: 714-782-6024
  cell: 714-697-8046
  linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewlombardi
  twitter: @kinabalu
  facebook: http://www.facebook.com/lombardi
  fan mystic: http://www.facebook.com/mysticcoders
  flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kinabalu
 
  Eco-Tip: Printing e-mails is usually a waste.
 
  --
  If this message wasn't addressed to you, don't use, disclose,
 distribute,
  print or copy any part of this message
 
 
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 
 
  To our success!
 
  Mystic Coders, LLC | Code Magic | www.mysticcoders.com
 
  ANDREW LOMBARDI |

Re: Calling wicket modal popup from non-wicket

2011-01-20 Thread Nelson Segura

That sounds like a good solution. Thanks!
-nelson

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:

 your best bet is to use a non-wicket modal and iframe a wicket page into
 it.

 -igor

 On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Nelson Segura nsegu...@gmail.com wrote:
  We are slowly migrating a JSP app to wicket. Parts of our app are written
 in
  Wicket, but most of it is still JSP.
  We need to integrate some of the new wicket functionality into old JSP
  pages, as fragments or modal popups. There is a lot of functionality in
 that
  page using JSP, so rewriting everything in wicket is not feasible.
  I would like to know if it is possible to call a wicket modal popup
 window
  from the JSP (using the windows that map to a page), and how to do it. I
 did
  look at the herebebeasties site already, and did not get much from
 there
  regarding integrating wicket into JSP.
  -Nelson
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell