Re: wicket version
Hi, Check http://wicket.apache.org/ The latest API docs are at http://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/6.0.x/ . I agree that 6.x would be more correct link name. The latest released version is http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/6.3.0. 6.4.0-SNAPSHOT is the current development version. On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Lucio Crusca lu...@sulweb.org wrote: Hello *, I'm moving my first steps in wicket. Great framework btw, though it lacks a bit of fresh howtos for version 6.x. Never mind, let's go straigh to my questions: 1. API docs for 6.4-SNAPHOST are hosted at a http://.../6.0.x; url (or the other way around, API docs for 6.0.x are titled 6.4.0). How does 6.4 release relate to 6.0.x release? Is it a minor release and replaces 6.0.x transparently? 2. Assuming the reply to the previous question was yes, what should I put in my pom.xml to have my project depend on the latest 6.x available release? Is it a good idea to configure the wicket dependency that way? Thanks in advance Lucio. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: a question on different data grid components available for wicket
Hi, InMethod Grid is more smarter. It supports column reordering, resizing, better Ajax support. But it is no active maintainer at the moment. Different community members provide patches when they need fixes but that's all. It is also based on Yahoo UI v.2. On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:45 PM, markR rosadom_...@yahoo.com wrote: I see that wicket-extensions has some data grid components, i also came across inmethod-grid which also has similar components, is their any relationship between these two projects, which one is wicket owned components, any advise and information on uses would be helpful, which one is preferred by wicket etc. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/a-question-on-different-data-grid-components-available-for-wicket-tp4654273.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: wicket 6 - filter resources based on runtime configuration
Hi, You can add two different bundles. In DEV mode the bundle will contain A, B and C and in PROD mode just A and D. In your pages/panels you have to add only A. Wicket will serve the proper bundle depending on the mode. On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:54 PM, kamiseq kami...@gmail.com wrote: hi, I try to figure out how to configure wicket to add resources A, B and C to head only if mode is development and only resource A, D if mode is production. in general should I fork the flow in each #renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) upon flag or can I do this somewhere in application config when defining HeaderResponseDecorator pozdrawiam Paweł Kamiński kami...@gmail.com pkaminski@gmail.com __ -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: a question on different data grid components available for wicket
Hi, On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote: Hi, InMethod Grid is more smarter. It supports column reordering, resizing, better Ajax support. But it is no active maintainer at the moment. Different community members provide patches when they need fixes but that's all. It is also based on Yahoo UI v.2. Maybe it is time to try to rewrite all column reordering, re-sizing logic based on jquery (instead of YUI). Now that jquery comes for free with wicket 6.x -- Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro Antilia Soft http://antiliasoft.com/ http://antiliasoft.com/antilia
Re: a question on different data grid components available for wicket
Hi, Let me see if I can find some time to give it a shoot this weekend. Drag and drop and column re-size should not be that difficult to rewrite in terms of jquery dd. On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi, InMethod Grid is more smarter. It supports column reordering, resizing, better Ajax support. But it is no active maintainer at the moment. Different community members provide patches when they need fixes but that's all. It is also based on Yahoo UI v.2. Maybe it is time to try to rewrite all column reordering, re-sizing logic based on jquery (instead of YUI). Now that jquery comes for free with wicket 6.x I'm sure many users will be happy of such change. Even upgrading to YUI 3 will be a big improvement. The same is valid for wicket-datetime module. -- Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro Antilia Soft http://antiliasoft.com/ http://antiliasoft.com/antilia -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/ -- Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro Antilia Soft http://antiliasoft.com/ http://antiliasoft.com/antilia
View and edit panel
Hi there, I'm currently implementing a panel that is used for viewing and editing of some entity. I wonder if there is an elegant solution for this. The situation: all my view/edit panels have a common abstract parent class (Panel), providing some general markup, i.e. I'm using wicket:extend in my concrete Panel implementation. Not every component is editable, only some. Currently I have a solution where I'm using a flag (isEditMode) and some if/else constructs to create either a label or e.g. a TextField. I keep the markup for the FormComponents as Fragments or separate Panels. Any more sophisticated ideas on how to implement this? ;-) Cheers, -Tom - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: View and edit panel
Hi Thomas, Bean edit panel is useful in this sort of scenarios. http://londonwicket.googlecode.com/files/LondonWicket-BeanEditor.pdf It is quite old, maybe there is a newer/better option. Best regards, Michal Wegrzyn -Original Message- From: Thomas Götz [mailto:t...@decoded.de] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:07 To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: View and edit panel Hi there, I'm currently implementing a panel that is used for viewing and editing of some entity. I wonder if there is an elegant solution for this. The situation: all my view/edit panels have a common abstract parent class (Panel), providing some general markup, i.e. I'm using wicket:extend in my concrete Panel implementation. Not every component is editable, only some. Currently I have a solution where I'm using a flag (isEditMode) and some if/else constructs to create either a label or e.g. a TextField. I keep the markup for the FormComponents as Fragments or separate Panels. Any more sophisticated ideas on how to implement this? ;-) Cheers, -Tom - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Strange behavior of TextField and AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
Hi,
thank you for idea again :) But I have another question now. This textfield
belongs to wicket panel. And I don't really understand where should I place
script/script tags. Is it enough to place it in the panel.html or
should I define it in some other location?
Dmitriy
2012/11/27 Sven Meier s...@meiers.net
oncklick
... or onclick ?
I'd recommend a javascript only solution without round-trip to the server.
http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/2851794/clear-text-**
onclick-textfieldhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/2851794/clear-text-onclick-textfield
Sven
On 11/27/2012 05:09 PM, Dmitriy Neretin wrote:
Hi wicket-users,
I have a question about a combination of the TextField and
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehav**ior.
I have a text field with content. Just to indicate what user should enter.
For example a day text filed, which already contains following DD.
I do it by following:
dayField.setModel(Model.of(**DD));
My idea now is to delete this text automatically. For example with
oncklick event. What I did is:
dayField.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehav**ior(oncklick){
onUpdate(){
doSomeStuff
}
});
So, the problem now is it doesn't work at first time! For example I click
in the field, delete the text, insert another text, leave the field. Click
in the filed again and only then onUpdate method performs. But it doesn't
perform at first time and I don't understand why...
Can somebody help me?
Regards,
Dmitriy
--**--**-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Strange behavior of TextField and AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
Actually I'd recommend not puting the placeholder in the input itself,
assuming you don't have to support old browsers that most other now have
stopped supporting a few years back. Depending on the browser of your
users, you can:
- use the html5 placeholder attribute (best way to do that, but you
won't support ie 10)
- have the placeholder appear in the input while it's not; one nice
technique is to use a label/span that you will move above the input with
css (using position attribute and z-index); then you have a little
javascript that will simply change the opacity of that placeholder
depending on conditions: with an initial opacity of 1, you can put it at
0.5 when the user focus the field, and at 0 once he entered anything.
Advantages of that compared to putting the placeholder in the input is
you don't have to worry about the placeholder value being actually
submitted by the client, and that you won't have any bloat to have the
placeholder back if the user empty the field.
Note that for the second option, you need opacity, and thus either IE8+
or have the proprietary ms syntax for that (IE5-7 using filter:
alpha(opacity=50);, IE8 using
-ms-filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha(Opacity=50);)
Sven Meier wrote:
oncklick
... or onclick ?
I'd recommend a javascript only solution without round-trip to the
server.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2851794/clear-text-onclick-textfield
Sven
On 11/27/2012 05:09 PM, Dmitriy Neretin wrote:
Hi wicket-users,
I have a question about a combination of the TextField and
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior.
I have a text field with content. Just to indicate what user should
enter.
For example a day text filed, which already contains following DD.
I do it by following:
dayField.setModel(Model.of(DD));
My idea now is to delete this text automatically. For example with
oncklick event. What I did is:
dayField.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(oncklick){
onUpdate(){
doSomeStuff
}
});
So, the problem now is it doesn't work at first time! For example I
click
in the field, delete the text, insert another text, leave the field.
Click
in the filed again and only then onUpdate method performs. But it
doesn't
perform at first time and I don't understand why...
Can somebody help me?
Regards,
Dmitriy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Strange behavior of TextField and AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
For the placeholder thing you can use the standard HTML5 way with a
polyfill such as the following (with Modernizr it will only be loaded if
the client need it) : https://github.com/ginader/HTML5-placeholder-polyfill
__
Cedric Gatay
http://www.bloggure.info | http://cedric.gatay.fr |
@Cedric_Gatayhttp://twitter.com/Cedric_Gatay
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Sébastien Gautrin
sebastien.gaut...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I'd recommend not puting the placeholder in the input itself,
assuming you don't have to support old browsers that most other now have
stopped supporting a few years back. Depending on the browser of your
users, you can:
- use the html5 placeholder attribute (best way to do that, but you won't
support ie 10)
- have the placeholder appear in the input while it's not; one nice
technique is to use a label/span that you will move above the input with
css (using position attribute and z-index); then you have a little
javascript that will simply change the opacity of that placeholder
depending on conditions: with an initial opacity of 1, you can put it at
0.5 when the user focus the field, and at 0 once he entered anything.
Advantages of that compared to putting the placeholder in the input is you
don't have to worry about the placeholder value being actually submitted by
the client, and that you won't have any bloat to have the placeholder back
if the user empty the field.
Note that for the second option, you need opacity, and thus either IE8+ or
have the proprietary ms syntax for that (IE5-7 using filter:
alpha(opacity=50);, IE8 using -ms-filter:progid:**
DXImageTransform.Microsoft.**Alpha(Opacity=50);)
Sven Meier wrote:
oncklick
... or onclick ?
I'd recommend a javascript only solution without round-trip to the server.
http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/2851794/clear-text-**
onclick-textfieldhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/2851794/clear-text-onclick-textfield
Sven
On 11/27/2012 05:09 PM, Dmitriy Neretin wrote:
Hi wicket-users,
I have a question about a combination of the TextField and
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehav**ior.
I have a text field with content. Just to indicate what user should
enter.
For example a day text filed, which already contains following DD.
I do it by following:
dayField.setModel(Model.of(**DD));
My idea now is to delete this text automatically. For example with
oncklick event. What I did is:
dayField.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehav**ior(oncklick){
onUpdate(){
doSomeStuff
}
});
So, the problem now is it doesn't work at first time! For example I click
in the field, delete the text, insert another text, leave the field.
Click
in the filed again and only then onUpdate method performs. But it doesn't
perform at first time and I don't understand why...
Can somebody help me?
Regards,
Dmitriy
--**--**-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--**--**-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket:link + component images
Okay. I digged out more deeply. The bottom line is if the img inside a p or a div tag then the images are broken. If there is no surrounding tag or a just a simple snap then everything works fine. Somehow wicket:link ignores those kind of tags. This works fine. wicket:link pwicket:link wicket.contrib.tinymce.InPlaceEditBehavior/wicket.contrib.tinymce.InPlaceEditBehavior/wicket.contrib.tinymce.InPlaceEditBehavior/wicket.contrib.tinymce.InPlaceEditBehavior/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-cool.gif /wicket:link/p /wicket:link /div But this does not. wicket:link pwicket:link wicket.contrib.tinymce.InPlaceEditBehavior/wicket.contrib.tinymce.InPlaceEditBehavior/wicket.contrib.tinymce.InPlaceEditBehavior/wicket.contrib.tinymce.InPlaceEditBehavior/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-cool.gif /wicket:link/p /wicket:link /div thnx., Sandor -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-link-component-images-tp4654258p4654294.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Strange behavior of TextField and AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
Thank you guys, but unfortunately I have some constraints related to the
layout etc. and I can't avoid them...
Dmitriy
2012/11/28 Cedric Gatay gata...@gmail.com
For the placeholder thing you can use the standard HTML5 way with a
polyfill such as the following (with Modernizr it will only be loaded if
the client need it) :
https://github.com/ginader/HTML5-placeholder-polyfill
__
Cedric Gatay
http://www.bloggure.info | http://cedric.gatay.fr |
@Cedric_Gatayhttp://twitter.com/Cedric_Gatay
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Sébastien Gautrin
sebastien.gaut...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I'd recommend not puting the placeholder in the input itself,
assuming you don't have to support old browsers that most other now have
stopped supporting a few years back. Depending on the browser of your
users, you can:
- use the html5 placeholder attribute (best way to do that, but you won't
support ie 10)
- have the placeholder appear in the input while it's not; one nice
technique is to use a label/span that you will move above the input with
css (using position attribute and z-index); then you have a little
javascript that will simply change the opacity of that placeholder
depending on conditions: with an initial opacity of 1, you can put it at
0.5 when the user focus the field, and at 0 once he entered anything.
Advantages of that compared to putting the placeholder in the input is
you
don't have to worry about the placeholder value being actually submitted
by
the client, and that you won't have any bloat to have the placeholder
back
if the user empty the field.
Note that for the second option, you need opacity, and thus either IE8+
or
have the proprietary ms syntax for that (IE5-7 using filter:
alpha(opacity=50);, IE8 using -ms-filter:progid:**
DXImageTransform.Microsoft.**Alpha(Opacity=50);)
Sven Meier wrote:
oncklick
... or onclick ?
I'd recommend a javascript only solution without round-trip to the
server.
http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/2851794/clear-text-**
onclick-textfield
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2851794/clear-text-onclick-textfield
Sven
On 11/27/2012 05:09 PM, Dmitriy Neretin wrote:
Hi wicket-users,
I have a question about a combination of the TextField and
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehav**ior.
I have a text field with content. Just to indicate what user should
enter.
For example a day text filed, which already contains following DD.
I do it by following:
dayField.setModel(Model.of(**DD));
My idea now is to delete this text automatically. For example with
oncklick event. What I did is:
dayField.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehav**ior(oncklick){
onUpdate(){
doSomeStuff
}
});
So, the problem now is it doesn't work at first time! For example I
click
in the field, delete the text, insert another text, leave the field.
Click
in the filed again and only then onUpdate method performs. But it
doesn't
perform at first time and I don't understand why...
Can somebody help me?
Regards,
Dmitriy
--**--**-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org
users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--**--**-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org
users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How important is detaching models really ?
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Marios Skounakis msc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Colin, I find I am in agreement with your points about lazy loaded parts of the data model and how this can be simplified if you use LDMs. However, if you use LDMs for edit pages, you need to deal with concurrency issues yourself. You cannot rely on Hibernate's optimistic concurrency mechanism (version). Because every time your LDM fetches a fresh instance of the entity, you can never have a StaleObjectException. Dealing with concurrency yourself may be as easy as keeping the version property in addition to the Id property in the LDM, and checking against it when re-attaching the model, but this does add some complexity to the application code. Any thoughts on this? From the good old days: http://martijndashorst.com/blog/2006/02/13/wicket-goodie-hibernate-versioned-form/ Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Authorization without redirect
Hi everyone, I'm currently building an application using wicket 1.4.21 and what I'm trying to achieve is the following: I have a protected area (stage 1) which requires the user to input his credentials and I'm using an AuthorizationStrategy for this. This Strategy throws a RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException in it's onUnauthorizedInstantiation method. (works as is with a redirect to a Login Page) However, within stage 1 I have links to another page (stage 2) which requires a PIN and I want no redirect to the login page again but just show a pop-up with an input field. Something like a confirmation dialog which on close still displays the page the link to stage 2 was rendered in. Any ideas? Thanks, Karsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Authorization without redirect
See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Modal+Windows Opening a modal window on page load (no AJAX involved) You could use one to block the page till pin is typed. On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Karsten Gaul karsten.g...@exedio.comwrote: Hi everyone, I'm currently building an application using wicket 1.4.21 and what I'm trying to achieve is the following: I have a protected area (stage 1) which requires the user to input his credentials and I'm using an AuthorizationStrategy for this. This Strategy throws a RestartResponseAtInterceptPage**Exception in it's onUnauthorizedInstantiation method. (works as is with a redirect to a Login Page) However, within stage 1 I have links to another page (stage 2) which requires a PIN and I want no redirect to the login page again but just show a pop-up with an input field. Something like a confirmation dialog which on close still displays the page the link to stage 2 was rendered in. Any ideas? Thanks, Karsten --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro Antilia Soft http://antiliasoft.com/ http://antiliasoft.com/antilia
Re: a question on different data grid components available for wicket
Ive been working on an improved DataTables.net wrapper for Wicket. Its applied as a Behavior on top of the existing Wicket repeaters/datatables - with one caveat that the Behavior requires a table element to work with that has a complete structure - table, thead, tbody. With some assistance from Martin Ive got the expandable details panels working - these load dynamically via Ajax. Datatables supports most of the things you listed there, as well as many others (client side pagination, sorting, multi-column sort, client side search/filtering) etc. The Behavior can overlay its functionality on top of pre-rendered information in the DOM, or it can be configured to retrieve data from the server via AJAX. You can also configure server side paging and filtering/searching if your data set is really big. It's still a work-in-progress but Im using it now in an application I'm developing so the API is being tweaked as I use it. I'll push it to SVN or Github soon. On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi, InMethod Grid is more smarter. It supports column reordering, resizing, better Ajax support. But it is no active maintainer at the moment. Different community members provide patches when they need fixes but that's all. It is also based on Yahoo UI v.2. Maybe it is time to try to rewrite all column reordering, re-sizing logic based on jquery (instead of YUI). Now that jquery comes for free with wicket 6.x -- Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro Antilia Soft http://antiliasoft.com/ http://antiliasoft.com/antilia
Re: View and edit panel
You can set the Panel non-editable, and all those Form components will become non-editable. On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Thomas Götz t...@decoded.de wrote: Hi there, I'm currently implementing a panel that is used for viewing and editing of some entity. I wonder if there is an elegant solution for this. The situation: all my view/edit panels have a common abstract parent class (Panel), providing some general markup, i.e. I'm using wicket:extend in my concrete Panel implementation. Not every component is editable, only some. Currently I have a solution where I'm using a flag (isEditMode) and some if/else constructs to create either a label or e.g. a TextField. I keep the markup for the FormComponents as Fragments or separate Panels. Any more sophisticated ideas on how to implement this? ;-) Cheers, -Tom - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Strange behavior of TextField and AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior
Well with the library linked by Cédric which let's you have html5
placeholder for older browsers, you actually don't have to touch
anything in the layout to use that. All you need to do is have your
wicket component (TextField most likely) contribute to the header the js
dependencies (with renderHead(Response)), as well as attach to it an
AttributeModifier which will define the placeholder attribute. (and if
you don't need support for older browsers, all you need it then the
AttributeModifier).
Dmitriy Neretin wrote:
Thank you guys, but unfortunately I have some constraints related to the
layout etc. and I can't avoid them...
Dmitriy
2012/11/28 Cedric Gatay gata...@gmail.com
For the placeholder thing you can use the standard HTML5 way with a
polyfill such as the following (with Modernizr it will only be loaded if
the client need it) :
https://github.com/ginader/HTML5-placeholder-polyfill
__
Cedric Gatay
http://www.bloggure.info | http://cedric.gatay.fr |
@Cedric_Gatayhttp://twitter.com/Cedric_Gatay
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Sébastien Gautrin
sebastien.gaut...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I'd recommend not puting the placeholder in the input itself,
assuming you don't have to support old browsers that most other now have
stopped supporting a few years back. Depending on the browser of your
users, you can:
- use the html5 placeholder attribute (best way to do that, but you won't
support ie 10)
- have the placeholder appear in the input while it's not; one nice
technique is to use a label/span that you will move above the input with
css (using position attribute and z-index); then you have a little
javascript that will simply change the opacity of that placeholder
depending on conditions: with an initial opacity of 1, you can put it at
0.5 when the user focus the field, and at 0 once he entered anything.
Advantages of that compared to putting the placeholder in the input is
you
don't have to worry about the placeholder value being actually submitted
by
the client, and that you won't have any bloat to have the placeholder
back
if the user empty the field.
Note that for the second option, you need opacity, and thus either IE8+
or
have the proprietary ms syntax for that (IE5-7 using filter:
alpha(opacity=50);, IE8 using -ms-filter:progid:**
DXImageTransform.Microsoft.**Alpha(Opacity=50);)
Sven Meier wrote:
oncklick
... or onclick ?
I'd recommend a javascript only solution without round-trip to the
server.
http://stackoverflow.com/**questions/2851794/clear-text-**
onclick-textfield
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2851794/clear-text-onclick-textfield
Sven
On 11/27/2012 05:09 PM, Dmitriy Neretin wrote:
Hi wicket-users,
I have a question about a combination of the TextField and
AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehav**ior.
I have a text field with content. Just to indicate what user should
enter.
For example a day text filed, which already contains following DD.
I do it by following:
dayField.setModel(Model.of(**DD));
My idea now is to delete this text automatically. For example with
oncklick event. What I did is:
dayField.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehav**ior(oncklick){
onUpdate(){
doSomeStuff
}
});
So, the problem now is it doesn't work at first time! For example I
click
in the field, delete the text, insert another text, leave the field.
Click
in the filed again and only then onUpdate method performs. But it
doesn't
perform at first time and I don't understand why...
Can somebody help me?
Regards,
Dmitriy
--**--**-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org
users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--**--**-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org
users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket as portlet
Hi Colin, How much I hate to tell you, but your mostly on your own. We are currently on Wicket 1.4 for our portlets and also planning an upgrade to Wicket 6. But portlet support is at your own risk as non of the core committers is comfortable with portlets so it's no longer a core feature. Most information on the portlet stuff can be found here [1] and here[2] is a working but not fully tested code base for Wicket 6. Most of the people (that I know of) using Wicket portlet use Liferay. I don't know of any people using IBM portal. Hope this helps. Thijs [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4019 [2] https://github.com/matthiasgasser/wicket-portlet On 28-11-2012 8:52, Colin Chalmers wrote: Hello all, We currently have a wicket-1.5.9 application running at a client and next year they want to migrate this to IBM Portal based on JSR-286. I have read some mixed messages on the maillist concerning wicket support for portlets and specifically the IBM Portal container so I am unsure of the current status. Before embarking on this I'd like to verify the current portlet support and am interested in hearing from anyone who has experience with Wicket portlets running inside the IBM Portal conatiner. rgds Colin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket as portlet
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Thijs vonk.th...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Colin, How much I hate to tell you, but your mostly on your own. We are currently on Wicket 1.4 for our portlets and also planning an upgrade to Wicket 6. But portlet support is at your own risk as non of the core committers is comfortable with portlets so it's no longer a core feature. Most information on the portlet stuff can be found here [1] and here[2] is a working but not fully tested code base for Wicket 6. Most of the people (that I know of) using Wicket portlet use Liferay. I don't know of any people using IBM portal. Hope this helps. Thijs [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/WICKET-4019https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4019 [2] https://github.com/**matthiasgasser/wicket-portlethttps://github.com/matthiasgasser/wicket-portlet This is another work in progress of upgrading wicketstuff-portlet to Wicket 6 : https://github.com/zeratul021/core/commit/0209130543de8490a4972f55164c9900d2951a28 As far as I know the developer also uses Liferay. On 28-11-2012 8:52, Colin Chalmers wrote: Hello all, We currently have a wicket-1.5.9 application running at a client and next year they want to migrate this to IBM Portal based on JSR-286. I have read some mixed messages on the maillist concerning wicket support for portlets and specifically the IBM Portal container so I am unsure of the current status. Before embarking on this I'd like to verify the current portlet support and am interested in hearing from anyone who has experience with Wicket portlets running inside the IBM Portal conatiner. rgds Colin --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/
Re: Wicket as portlet
Hi, the last link is indeed currently used in Liferay environment so I can't vouch for anything else. There are neither unit nor integration tests. The code there is based on the one found in mentioned issue for Wicket 6.0 branch. We are currently in the final phase of project migration and regression tests look fine so it's working in combination with Wicket 6.3.0 and Liferay 5.2.3. We even got it running in Liferay 6 but I won't make any assumptions there. Feel free to evaluate the code, it needs some testing before we can think of pushing it to the wicketstuff-core/master. Regards, Marek On 11/28/2012 04:18 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Thijs vonk.th...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Colin, How much I hate to tell you, but your mostly on your own. We are currently on Wicket 1.4 for our portlets and also planning an upgrade to Wicket 6. But portlet support is at your own risk as non of the core committers is comfortable with portlets so it's no longer a core feature. Most information on the portlet stuff can be found here [1] and here[2] is a working but not fully tested code base for Wicket 6. Most of the people (that I know of) using Wicket portlet use Liferay. I don't know of any people using IBM portal. Hope this helps. Thijs [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/WICKET-4019https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4019 [2] https://github.com/**matthiasgasser/wicket-portlethttps://github.com/matthiasgasser/wicket-portlet This is another work in progress of upgrading wicketstuff-portlet to Wicket 6 : https://github.com/zeratul021/core/commit/0209130543de8490a4972f55164c9900d2951a28 As far as I know the developer also uses Liferay. On 28-11-2012 8:52, Colin Chalmers wrote: Hello all, We currently have a wicket-1.5.9 application running at a client and next year they want to migrate this to IBM Portal based on JSR-286. I have read some mixed messages on the maillist concerning wicket support for portlets and specifically the IBM Portal container so I am unsure of the current status. Before embarking on this I'd like to verify the current portlet support and am interested in hearing from anyone who has experience with Wicket portlets running inside the IBM Portal conatiner. rgds Colin --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.orgusers-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Jqwicket
Hi Folks - has there been any progress on JQWicket for Wicket 6.0? I am unable to upgrade to Wicket 6.3 because I am using several JQWicket components. I would like to avoid switching over to Wi-Query since our system is in production and it will have widespread impact at this time. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Jqwicket-tp4651665p4654306.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Jqwicket
The current version on wiquery uses an older jquery version than does Wicket 6.3.0 which was causing issues for us. N On Nov 28, 2012 1:23 PM, vishal vrvai...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Folks - has there been any progress on JQWicket for Wicket 6.0? I am unable to upgrade to Wicket 6.3 because I am using several JQWicket components. I would like to avoid switching over to Wi-Query since our system is in production and it will have widespread impact at this time. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Jqwicket-tp4651665p4654306.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Dynamic Components
Martin The approach of adding the Sub/Details Panel to a DummyPage works fine for basic Panels, but there are a few problems I've hit: 1. onInitialize() isnt called - Im assuming this is because the Panel doesnt go through a normal lifecycle before being rendered back to the ART? 2. None of the Ajax/Links work - they are loading up the DummyPage Now Im assuming this is all because the Component/Panel on the server side isnt associated with a real live page? Following on from a discussion thread that Chris Colman was going on about IComponentResolvers and those components being second class citizens, would it be possible to create dynamic components in a Page, and store them in a non-markup related area of the Page, such that they would go through normal lifecycle events etc, and AJAX callbacks would work to the Page, but they wouldnt be associated with the normal markup/component hierarchy? Based on Chris' comments, it seems like he has the initial stages of a workable solution to breaking the Component / Markup hierarchy and allowing a very flexible way of building applications. While I dont know what else Component Queueing was going to add, it seems that such functionality would provide a way to break the current hierarchy matching requirement. In my specific case, Im ok if the Components get thrown away on a full page (re)render, or that if Components were instantiated and not referenced in the markup, then they could be thrown away. While this might not suit the core framework for v7.0, could I build such functionality using the existing v6 APIs (maybe via a custom BasePage/ Component wrapper) and hooking in to the rendering cycle? N
Unit testing for a page
Hi all, I'm trying to implement a unit test for a page. The unit testing means I should test one page only. Suppose I have a page with a link. When I do wicketTester.clickLink(myLink); The WicketTester renders another page, the page rendering requires a lot of other injected dependencies, and the unit test set-up grows too much making the test fragile. I just want to verify that another page is set as a response page. Is it possible to do it? What are the best practices for unit testing of a wicket application? -- WBR, Anatoly.
understanding ajax response
I receive several of evaluate tags within ajax-response such as below, i also receive several priority-evaluate tags, what are these meant for, reworking an existing application so i am not very clear how ajax response works in wicket, the browser craps out parsing one or another of the evaluate tags (too much recursion error), is there a way to overcome this parsing. I understand that these are being generated by several ajax links in my application, my goal is to overcome the browser issue with these, its quite annoying that application runs fine on Opera but on Firefox (the browser used in my firm) this is a serious problem. ajax-response . . . evaluate - /evaluate . . . /ajax-response -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/understanding-ajax-response-tp4654310.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Dynamic Components
Hi, We've written the following class to dynamically add components to a page and then render them in an ajax request: http://pastebin.com/p4cSNsUw The rendered component is in the current page, not in a dummy page, so everything works as expected. The only thing that doesn't work is a full re-render, since that requires a hook in the page markup, which does not exist (hence dynamic components). To circumvent that, the dynamic components are automatically removed on a full page re-render. Have a look at the code, maybe it helps you. It's rather simple when you think about it. onInitialize() and ajax calls in the dynamically injected components work as expected for us. We use it in our (wicket 1.5) cms to dynamically inject editors and popups. Met vriendelijke groet, Kind regards, Bas Gooren Op 28-11-2012 21:00, schreef Nick Pratt: Martin The approach of adding the Sub/Details Panel to a DummyPage works fine for basic Panels, but there are a few problems I've hit: 1. onInitialize() isnt called - Im assuming this is because the Panel doesnt go through a normal lifecycle before being rendered back to the ART? 2. None of the Ajax/Links work - they are loading up the DummyPage Now Im assuming this is all because the Component/Panel on the server side isnt associated with a real live page? Following on from a discussion thread that Chris Colman was going on about IComponentResolvers and those components being second class citizens, would it be possible to create dynamic components in a Page, and store them in a non-markup related area of the Page, such that they would go through normal lifecycle events etc, and AJAX callbacks would work to the Page, but they wouldnt be associated with the normal markup/component hierarchy? Based on Chris' comments, it seems like he has the initial stages of a workable solution to breaking the Component / Markup hierarchy and allowing a very flexible way of building applications. While I dont know what else Component Queueing was going to add, it seems that such functionality would provide a way to break the current hierarchy matching requirement. In my specific case, Im ok if the Components get thrown away on a full page (re)render, or that if Components were instantiated and not referenced in the markup, then they could be thrown away. While this might not suit the core framework for v7.0, could I build such functionality using the existing v6 APIs (maybe via a custom BasePage/ Component wrapper) and hooking in to the rendering cycle? N
Re: any book about wicket 6?
Andrea: Thanks for the tree sample code. Besides GIT, do you have a web site where these examples are hosted live or your Wicket articles are posted? best *P On 11/16/12 8:07 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: I didn't write an article on tree components yet :) , but I've built a very basic example for NestedTree. The code is quite simple and it uses both nodes and model from Swing package (like the old Tree component). You can find it here: https://github.com/bitstorm/Wicket-tutorial-examples/tree/master/CheckBoxAjaxTree On 11/15/2012 03:27 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: I'd like an article about the new Tree/TreeTable components in Wicket 6. I find it hard to grasp. Maybe because most of its code is in wicket-examples and the example there is too big and abstract. I tried twice to migrate from the old/deprecated TableTree and both times I gave up. On Wed, Nov 14, - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Dynamic Components
I found a problem with the previous algorithm and fixed it. The problem
involved Panel markup that contained some markup with wicket:id tags
*outside* the
wicket:panel
/wicket:panel
element. These were resulting in components being added also but they
shouldn't. I now add an extra check with a 'processing' semaphore that,
when 0, indicates that wicket:id tags should be processed, otherwise
they are ignored.
boolean isPanel = container instanceof Panel;
// Panels should not process markup elements outside the
// wicket:panel element but pages should process all markup
int processing = isPanel ? 0 : 1;
for (MarkupElement markupElement: markupElements)
{
if ( markupElement instanceof WicketTag )
{
WicketTag wicketTag = (WicketTag)markupElement;
if ( wicketTag.isPanelTag())
{
if ( wicketTag.getXmlTag().isOpen() )
processing++;
else
processing--;
}
}
else if
(
processing 0
markupElement instanceof ComponentTag )
{
ComponentTag tag = (ComponentTag)markupElement;
String rawTagId = tag.getId();
if ( rawTagId != null )
{
String tagId;
...
-Original Message-
From: Nick Pratt [mailto:nbpr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2012 7:01 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Dynamic Components
Martin
The approach of adding the Sub/Details Panel to a DummyPage works fine
for
basic Panels, but there are a few problems I've hit:
1. onInitialize() isnt called - Im assuming this is because the Panel
doesnt go through a normal lifecycle before being rendered back to the
ART?
2. None of the Ajax/Links work - they are loading up the DummyPage
Now Im assuming this is all because the Component/Panel on the server
side
isnt associated with a real live page?
Following on from a discussion thread that Chris Colman was going on
about
IComponentResolvers and those components being second class citizens,
would
it be possible to create dynamic components in a Page, and store them
in a
non-markup related area of the Page, such that they would go through
normal
lifecycle events etc, and AJAX callbacks would work to the Page, but
they
wouldnt be associated with the normal markup/component hierarchy?
Based on Chris' comments, it seems like he has the initial stages of a
workable solution to breaking the Component / Markup hierarchy and
allowing
a very flexible way of building applications. While I dont know what
else
Component Queueing was going to add, it seems that such functionality
would
provide a way to break the current hierarchy matching requirement.
In my specific case, Im ok if the Components get thrown away on a full
page
(re)render, or that if Components were instantiated and not referenced
in
the markup, then they could be thrown away.
While this might not suit the core framework for v7.0, could I build
such
functionality using the existing v6 APIs (maybe via a custom BasePage/
Component wrapper) and hooking in to the rendering cycle?
N
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Dynamic Components
Martin The approach of adding the Sub/Details Panel to a DummyPage works fine for basic Panels, but there are a few problems I've hit: 1. onInitialize() isnt called - Im assuming this is because the Panel doesnt go through a normal lifecycle before being rendered back to the ART? 2. None of the Ajax/Links work - they are loading up the DummyPage The method I've provided involves calling a static addDynamicComponents(this); method from the onInitialise of a base class Panel and base class Page. Obviously all pages and panels need to derive from these common, application defined, Page and Panel classes - but that's no problem and most Wicket apps probably already do this as it's an easy way to add styling, behaviour etc., across the entire app easily. This mechanism results in the dynamic components being added within the onInitialize method and so the dynamic components' own onInitialize methods are called which means you can have nested addition of dynamic components to any level your require. Because the components are added within the onInitialize method of their parent component all the AJAX goodies work as expected :) Now Im assuming this is all because the Component/Panel on the server side isnt associated with a real live page? Following on from a discussion thread that Chris Colman was going on about IComponentResolvers and those components being second class citizens, would it be possible to create dynamic components in a Page, and store them in a non-markup related area of the Page, such that they would go through normal lifecycle events etc, and AJAX callbacks would work to the Page, but they wouldnt be associated with the normal markup/component hierarchy? Based on Chris' comments, it seems like he has the initial stages of a workable solution to breaking the Component / Markup hierarchy and allowing a very flexible way of building applications. While I dont know what else Component Queueing was going to add, it seems that such functionality would provide a way to break the current hierarchy matching requirement. In my specific case, Im ok if the Components get thrown away on a full page (re)render, or that if Components were instantiated and not referenced in the markup, then they could be thrown away. While this might not suit the core framework for v7.0, could I build such functionality using the existing v6 APIs (maybe via a custom BasePage/ Component wrapper) and hooking in to the rendering cycle? N - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
