Re: Issue w/ Ajax and setting form containers visible in Deployment mode.
Thank for the clarification; I'll be sure to keep that in mind with future development. My web application is now running as designed, thanks for your feedback everyone! On Thursday, November 7, 2013 11:46 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi, wicket:xyz tags are not rendered in deployment mode. See IMarkupSettings#setStripWicketTags(boolean) On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Ben S br...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I found the solution before receiving an answer. I found that using the wicket:container markup tags in development mode will actually work with setVisible toggling, but not in deployment mode. I don't know if this is due to me using the wicket:container tag incorrectly or not. For my solution I just switched the tags over to div tags. I realized after the fact I probably could have used panels as opposed to containers for the solution, but it's a bit too late for that now. On Thursday, November 7, 2013 9:12 AM, Ben S br...@yahoo.com wrote: Here's the code and markup, I'll begin looking for any errors I have made, thanks! http://pastebin.com/eVQfYCpx On Thursday, November 7, 2013 5:20 AM, Nick Pratt nbpr...@gmail.com wrote: This functionality does work - can you put your code up on pastebin/gist/whatever so we can take a look? (Markup and Source please) On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Ben S br...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, I've been trying to work on this issue for hours and have had no luck. Basically, my code works just fine in development mode as intended, however when in Deployment mode I can't seem to get WebMarkupContainers toggle between visibility. If they're visible, they won't go invisible, however if they are invisible they will toggle visible. However, the markup containers seems to work as expected when the form is passed to the AjaxRequestTarget, however this will clear all the data that's on the form page, even though the form is set up for a compound property model.. Is there any way to set the webmarkupcontainers visible to false using ajax in Deployment mode?
Re: wicket conversation scope - weld integration
Hi again, finally i found the last problem bei incident: I had the beans.xml under WEB-INF and WEB-INF/META-INF as described in the docs and user forums. But actually it turned out that i had to put it under classes/META-INF or whatever the class folder is named. But nevertheless your hints were very valuable. Thank you! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-conversation-scope-weld-integration-tp4662028p4662228.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Struggling with ContextRelativeResource, RenderedDynamicImageResource and SharedResources
may I ask what is the use case for this 1x1 PNG? Is it something that cannot be handled via CSS + static image on resources? On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Dirk Forchel dirk.forc...@exedio.comwrote: Okay. I know, but their is no need for an additional parameter. I want to generate always the same image (a 1x1px PNG with a transparent background). So I don't see the need for a parameter. But I try to prepare a quickstart. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Struggling-with-ContextRelativeResource-RenderedDynamicImageResource-and-SharedResources-tp4662190p4662225.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Re: Session expires almost immediate after login
Hi, The sessionid appears in the url when the application is requested for a first time. In this case the request doesn't bring JSESSIONID cookie and the server doesn't know whether cookies are supported/enabled in the browser so it uses both url rewriting and cookie in the response. When the second request is comes the server sees the cookie and there is no need to write the sessionid in the url anymore. Remove the cookie locally and you will see it in the url. You can add a session listener to see why the sessions are invalidated. See http://www.mkyong.com/servlet/a-simple-httpsessionlistener-example-active-sessions-counter/ . Put a breakpoint or dump the stacktrace in onDestroyed. On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Marieke Vandamme marieke.vanda...@tvh.bewrote: Dear wicket users, We have an ecommerce platform based on wicket. Since our latest release (with wicket 6.8.0) multiple users complain that their session expires too early. We did not set the timeout in our web.xml or something, so it's handled by jetty, and the default of 30 minutes is set there. The users we could ask, are using google chrome as browser. One time we could see this problem, the jsessionid was present in the url when going to the login page. Myself I never have this problem, and the jsessionid is never present in my url. The user needs to turn on cookies, because this is something that we test on the login page, and otherwise no login is possible. Has it something to do with the jsessionid? Has anyone else had this problem? I know it's hard, because I can not simulate or attach quickstart or something. Any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance. Kind Regards, Marieke Vandamme -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Session-expires-almost-immediate-after-login-tp4662205.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Struggling with ContextRelativeResource, RenderedDynamicImageResource and SharedResources
No, actually not. We've got a complete layout for our web applications from an external design company and they use this CSS+static image resource thing quite often. And, as I have mentioned before, we have two Wicket web applications running in the same container. One of them on the root context and one of them on e.g. /foo. If I start the application server (Tomcat) and request the home page of the second application (e.g. /foo/uk/en/home.html) the first application is initialized too, just to render the static placeholder image from the web container. I was wondering why and started to do some investigation. If I would disable the first web application (remove the servlet from web.xml), all works fine and even the static image resource from the web container is delivered. By the way ... I've finished to prepare a quickstart (see uploaded quickstart.zip file). At the first glance all images were rendered. I've added an additional mapper (the LocalMapper from the Wicket examples) to simulate our Country/Language mapping solution and ... oh wonder ... the second and third images are not rendered! quickstart.zip http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/file/n4662232/quickstart.zip -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Struggling-with-ContextRelativeResource-RenderedDynamicImageResource-and-SharedResources-tp4662190p4662232.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket site on Android phone
I also tried to make a desktop Wicket application to look good on Android
phone.
1. Depending on application there is a big possibility to not be able to
show all the information. For me, it was ok to use css media query to have a
different css for Android phone. I had to tweak with fonts size and hide
some markups.
2. Modal Windows are a big pain for me. I had to make them show near the top
with fixed position like:
.wicket-modal {
position: fixed !important;
top:5% !important;
}
Without this, on Webkit browser if you scroll down to click some link which
opens a modal, you even won't be able to see the modal (depends on how much
scrolling you need).
I cannot drag a modal on screen (neither in Webkit browser nor in Chrome).
Only the background is dragged.
So I guess, if you can avoid modals, then do it. If you cannot avoid them,
then keep them as small as possible.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-site-on-Android-phone-tp2966635p4662234.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Wicket Components as Class Members
Dumb question everyone, I heard somewhere that it is bad to declare variables as final in Wicket because they are treated as class members, and Wicket serializes the page that would increase your session size. Because of this I have not declared any components I add to my page as final (or created class member variables for them), and if I need to access them from an anonymous class I use the page.get(compId) method. This has made my code very cumbersome and hard to read. I got to thinking, since Wicket serializes all the components anyways, what would it hurt to make a component final or a class member when declaring it? It would sure make it easier to access later on. I really feel like an idiot asking this question, just concerned about session size. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Components-as-Class-Members-tp4662235.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket Components as Class Members
The only thing I googled related to final and wicket is this: 7. Java nuances — There are two Java nuances that catch many Wicket newcomers off-guard. 1. The first is serialization. Wicket uses Java serialization to store the state of your component hierarchy (the page and all its components and their components and so-on) in memory or on disk between page requests. This means you need to be careful because things can get serialized by accident. The most common cause of this is declaring a variable final outside of an anonymous inner class and then using it inside that anonymous inner class. Doing this causes the compiler to add a member variable to the anonymous inner class. If that final variable is a large collection or a service from your middle-tier, this can cause a gigantic explosion of memory usage and can be hard to track down. In short: be very cautious with what you reference within anonymous inner classes and use member variables in your classes sparingly. source: http://wickettraining.com/ten-things-every-wicket-programmer-should-know.html -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Components-as-Class-Members-tp4662235p4662237.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Handler after jqXhR success et before ajax response proccess
I use a AjaxCallListener (getBeforeHandler) to execute some javascript before the ajax processing, but I don't find a handler to execute some javascript after jqXHR.success et before the Ajax response is process. Is there a aim ? Duto - Duto -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Handler-after-jqXhR-success-et-before-ajax-response-proccess-tp4662239.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Handler after jqXhR success et before ajax response proccess
There's no callback before the Ajax response is processed - what do you need it for? Sven On 11/08/2013 07:45 PM, Olivier Dutrieux wrote: I use a AjaxCallListener (getBeforeHandler) to execute some javascript before the ajax processing, but I don't find a handler to execute some javascript after jqXHR.success et before the Ajax response is process. Is there a aim ? Duto - Duto -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Handler-after-jqXhR-success-et-before-ajax-response-proccess-tp4662239.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket Components as Class Members
Hi, since Wicket serializes all the components anyways, what would it hurt to make a component final or a class member when declaring it? your reasoning is sound, it does not hurt (besides 4 additional bytes for the object reference). if I need to access them from an anonymous class I use the page.get(compId) method. This has made my code very cumbersome and hard to read. I've seen this in some projects, personally I can't stand this usage. Regards Sven On 11/08/2013 05:08 PM, mashleyttu wrote: Dumb question everyone, I heard somewhere that it is bad to declare variables as final in Wicket because they are treated as class members, and Wicket serializes the page that would increase your session size. Because of this I have not declared any components I add to my page as final (or created class member variables for them), and if I need to access them from an anonymous class I use the page.get(compId) method. This has made my code very cumbersome and hard to read. I got to thinking, since Wicket serializes all the components anyways, what would it hurt to make a component final or a class member when declaring it? It would sure make it easier to access later on. I really feel like an idiot asking this question, just concerned about session size. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Components-as-Class-Members-tp4662235.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Handler after jqXhR success et before ajax response proccess
To simple explain : on before XHRHttpRequest I change some div and want to restore the div before Ajax response is processed because sometime the respond processed update the div and sometime not. and if the ajax response update the div I want to keep it (don't restore it) and if the div is not update I want to restore it and for me the best think is to restore it in all case before the response is processed ... Sorry for my english :s Duto - Duto -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Handler-after-jqXhR-success-et-before-ajax-response-proccess-tp4662239p4662242.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Handler after jqXhR success et before ajax response proccess
Is there a aim to execute processAjaxResponse (javascript method to handled the ajax response by wicket-ajax.js) in IAjaxCallListener's success handler if I set wr ajaxAttribute to false ? Duto - Duto -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Handler-after-jqXhR-success-et-before-ajax-response-proccess-tp4662239p4662245.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
filtering html proxy
Hello *, I need to build a page (maybe with Wicket, but not sure yet) that proxies another page on a different server that I do not own nor control in any way. Some background: let's call proxy my (wicket?) page, let's call backend the other page. Backend has a HTML form with three input fields and a submit button. When submitted, it shows a new form with two more input fields and a new submit button. The action URL of this second form changes with the previous three input fields. There are some fixed rules for this URL, but I don't know them. I only know that the same input values always yield the same action URL. When this second form is submitted, it shows a result from its database with a link. I need to take that link and save it in my database, in order to avoid filling in the two forms manually every time I need the link. Now my idea is to create a proxy page that loads the backend html, filters it changing all the action=... links and making them point to itself, so that it can intercept the form submission, act on its behalf, intercept the reply, save the result URL and show it to the final user. It would probably easier to do that with some scripting language, but this toy will grow up and become something serious, so I'd prefer starting off with some serious tool... I already have my Wicket-centric codebase and I'd like to reuse it, you see, so many things already done, but I fail to understand how to generate HTML code in Wicket the way it's needed for this pourpose, and I wonder if Wicket makes sense at all in this case. Any suggestions? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
