Re: wicket-spring Javadoc
Could somebody please point me to the location of the javadoc/api for the wicket.spring package? http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket-spring/1.3.0-SNAPSHOT/wicket-spring-1.3.0-SNAPSHOT-javadoc.jar
Re: Reacting to DateField change
Don't you need to setOutputMarkupId(true) as well on the component? On 8/9/07, Federico Fanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:10:58 +0100 Dipu Seminlal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you add onchange in the markup as well, you need to add it in the markup as well input wicket:id=yourDate id=yourDate type=text name=yourDate onchange=blah / I'm sorry, do you mean that Wicket replaces the blah on the fly? I thought that behaviors don't need modification to the markup.. Or maybe it's needed just for DateFields? I'll try with your suggestion though, many thanks :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can we do straight print in a java web application?
There's an onLoad event on a PDF (sounds vaguely familiar) in which you can initiate a print. I've done this on previous projects and works just fine. I can't recall if I autoclosed that PDF as well but it seems likely. On 8/20/07, hillj2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, this is available. It is possible to embed javascript inside a PDF. It depends on what you're using to generate the PDF however. I'm sure Acrobat can do it. There a library called iText which can. I think it can even go into an already created PDF and insert the necessary JS. We use a product called pdflib (not free). By inserting PDF javascript you can get a PDF document to print silently (no print dialog). The trick being you have to somehow open the PDF first. In our app we just have a print link that generates a PDF and spits it to the printer without the user having to even see the document first. We just load the PDF into a hidden IFRAME and on the document load the embedded javascript calls the print command. Do some research on JS for PDFs. It's been a while since I've dealt with that code, so I'm a bit rusty on it. Also it can be a bit cumbersome to get it working the way you want it, depending on your exact usecase. But it may be just what you're looking for. Good luck. Joel Martijn Dashorst wrote: Just think about it for 1 minute why this isn't available... (anwser below). Martijn Spam is of all ages, I figure that even in the clay tablet era people would create ads for enlargements of various body parts (just use a bigger nail!). So before e-mail was the prevalent means of spreading ads, the fax machine (documents sent through the phone line in an analog/copier type of fashion) was churning out forrests of (unwanted) ads. Now imagine a website hosted by Nigerian/Russian/Chinese/Dutch spammers. They would *love* a way to directly print documents without interventioni on the user's part. -- Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta2 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Can-we-do-straight-print-in-a-java-web-application--tf4289452.html#a12235547 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to integrate wicket frame work with spring
You can also look at qwicket.sf.net for some ideas on integrating spring and wicket. It's a little out of date atm but the ideas are the same either way On 8/30/07, bhupat parmar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi i need help in integrating wicket frame work with spring frame .i am using direct approach for this but my dao object is returning null.and the applicationcontext.xml is bean id=wicketApplication class=project.MyApplication property name=contactDao ref=contactDao/ /bean is throwing exception for undefined bean. can some body help. thanks
wicket:container beta3 and post snapshots
I suddenly started getting errors using wicket:container saying it failed to handle it. Is anyone else seeing this or is my env just really busted?
Re: How to set wicket's locale?
T-37 minutes until sushi time! On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sushi -igor On 9/6/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: new PropertyModel(Page.this, session.foo.sushi.bar); ? On 9/6/07, Gabor Szokoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/5/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can you make an jira issue for this? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-936 Any ideas on encapsulating the session as a propertymodel for components in 1.2? Gabor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: First Day Disgust!
I know i'm a little late on this thread, but as the author of qwicket, i take particular issue with saying because it's glued with hibernate and spring that it's no good. The express purpose of qwicket is to create a template for spring/hibernate/wicket based applications. So if it's no good because it uses those, the problem is with you. Blaming a tool built explicitly to leverage those libraries is, to be as blunt as you, stupid. Learn to pick better tools or hire out your work. On 9/8/07, chickabee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Wicketers, I tried wicket today and the example application was up and running on tomcat in no time, so that was the good part, after that if I like to create a sample application on my own then I found no easy way to start. Examples are good to browse through and tell about wicket capabilities, however, not so good from learning point of view, All of the examples are glued together in one big jar file and it is just not quick enough to create a bare-bone application quickly and easily, I tried Quicket as mentioned in the readme file, however, Quickets is nothing but waste of time, because it is glued with Hibernate and Spring and both should not be there to start with. Not a good experience trying wicket so far, I guess it's the time to try out some more simpler app frameworks, -Thumbs Down to Wicket! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/First-Day-Disgust%21-tf4405663.html#a12568938 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: First Day Disgust!
You could also look at how qwicket uses ant+maven tasks to build a system. The maven tasks handle downloading dependencies and ant does everything else. I know there's still that dependency on maven libs but it's just for the dependencies. And that's still miles ahead of using get to manage dependencies. If you'd rather add a get for all the dependencies and depdendencies of dependencies and dependencies of ... well, you're probably beyond all hope of help to start with. There may or may not be issues with repository availability but if you put something like artifactory between you and the maven repositories, most of those issues go away. In addition, you can deploy your own dependencies locally that have no maven presence anywhere and continue to use the same dependency definition scheme throughout your project. I don't like maven much either but I'd personally not manage my dependencies by hand. On 9/11/07, Konstantin Ignatyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like Ivy but I think that you are precisely correct: people will complain. I think that Ant's get command would be ideal and better than list of dependencies in README because it will explicitly point to the sources and it is easy to modify repository host if necessary. Konstantin Ignatyev - Original Message From: Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@wicket.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 2:30:21 PM Subject: Re: First Day Disgust! On 9/11/07, Konstantin Ignatyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: + generate ant build file to compile project and start jetty. That will make me happy as a lark :) I like Maven's idea and promise but implementation is not that great to my taste Then maybe Ant + Ivy would be good. Though people might start complaining about having to have Ivy installed. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ajax - Long process indicator ?
We're using matej's modal window to do just that. Works quite well. On 9/13/07, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Besides showing a progress indicator, you could also disable mouse interaction by overlaying a div that has the height and width of the entire page. Add a bit of javascript to the button to show/display such a div. Erik. Mael Sicsic wrote: In fact I my problem is the following : a form is submitted with an ajaxbutton, and processing of this form takes a long time (many server side DB checkings), and within this computing time, I would like to prevent the user to continue editing the form being processed... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FilterToolbar
Apparently the API between beta3 and the latest SNAPSHOT changed for FilterToolbar and now it needs a FilterForm. I can't find any examples (not even unit tests) that show how I should build my page/table with this new API. Does anyone have an example working with the latest code? Thanks.
Re: Passing Parameters to Bookmarkable Page
Having the link be both bookmarkable and having that object in the URL without persisting seems largely contradictory. Relying on having the object in the session also reduces the effect of making it bookmarkable. The only option I see for making it really bookmarkable (stateless) is serializing the object to the URL string and deserializing in the page constructor. And that's kinda ugly. On 9/20/07, Flavius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I pass the id, I have to persist the filter someplace, like the session. I try to avoid putting things on the session since it inhibits performance of session replication in a clustered environment. If I could get to the requestCycle when the link is clicked, it seems like I could pass it along the request. But the BookmarkablePageLink doesn't have an onClick() event. Thinking out loud, it seems like if there were parameters that were bookmarkable (e.g. included in the built url), and others that were not (passed along, but not part of the generated url). Maybe that's something that could be done on a custom RequestCycle. Or maybe it's not so bad having the obj on the session. :-) Evan Chooly wrote: Put the Filter ID in the map. On 9/18/07, Flavius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have two pages, a list page and a detail. The list page can take a filter parameter, or has a default one if one is not passed (making it bookmarkable). When the user clicks to go to the detail page, I want to pass that filter along, so that when an edit is complete, the page can redirect back to the list page with the same filter intact. I also want the detail page to be bookmarkable. If the detail page gets the filter, it simply passes it back. If not, that's fine too. I can accomplish this easily by creating a PageParameters: PageParameters parameters = new PageParameters(); parameters.put(filter, filter); BookmarkablePageLink link = new BookmarkablePageLink(name, MyDetailPage.class, parameters); And this works fine. But I don't like the way the URL is created like this: http://localhost/pages/MyDetailPage/item/20/filter/com.foo.bar.Filter%401ae6456/ If the page is bookmarked, the Filter obj doesn't matter anyway. I understand why it's there, I'm just trying to figure out a prettier URL, like when I pass a parameter on the requestCycle, setting the response page and passing the parameters obj in there. I've thought of overriding the onClick event for BookmarkablePageLink, but it's final. Another option was to pass it on the request or the session. That would be the last option. Any insight would be appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Passing-Parameters-to-Bookmarkable-Page-tf4478593.html#a12770252 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Passing-Parameters-to-Bookmarkable-Page-tf4478593.html#a12802323 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
body onload contribution
I used the following in my page constructor, but I'm not seeing the change in the HTML. What am I missing? add(new BodyTagAttributeModifier(onload, true, new Model(foo()), this));
Re: body onload contribution
Ah. that was the 1.3ism i was looking for. I'll try that. Thanks. I knew it had changed but couldn't remember the new approach. On 10/8/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What wicket version are you using? In 1.3 there's much better way to do this. Just use renderOnLoad/renderOnDomReady javascript on IHeaderResponse. -Matej On 10/8/07, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I used the following in my page constructor, but I'm not seeing the change in the HTML. What am I missing? add(new BodyTagAttributeModifier(onload, true, new Model(foo()), this)); - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: spring acegi injection question
You can do this: InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this); You need to do it in init(), though. The constructor is too early for the injector to be configured. Other than that, you can @SpringBean any bean you want. otherwise spring wouldn't be able to inject the bean - this is different to the annotation-based approach where a setter is not required. but AFAIK it is not possible to inject a spring-bean into the application class using the annotation based approach. greetings Michael -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/spring-acegi-injection-question-tf4658329.html#a13338057 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple wicket:child / tags on a single base page?
In our app we have a ListView into which we can dump panels for, in our case, various different filtering options depending on the page. The base page keeps a List and that's used as the model for the ListView. If the subclass doesn't add anything, nothing shows up. But the pages that need them can add them. These panels show up in the base page's markup area (outside the wicket:child/ area) with no hackery needed. I think the proposed patch is an overly complicated solution to problem that has many different simple solutions. I agree with the earlier comments about the proliferation of tags in wicket. I'd rather not see new tags added just for this. It fuglifies the markup for no real gain. On Nov 6, 2007 11:30 AM, Stefan Fußenegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I posted a new message in Wicket - Dev: http://www.nabble.com/Patch%3A-Multiple-%3Cwicket%3Achild--%3E-tags-on-a-single-base-page--tf4759260.html It contains a patch that demonstrates the discussed enhancement. Please comment! -- stefan Stefan Fußenegger wrote: Hi folks, I just stumbled on a situation where it would be useful to have two or more wicket:child / tags in a base page. Just consider a layout that consists of the usual footer, header, navigation, and content parts. But now, the content should be arranged in two columns, e.g. two different div /s. To give a short example, the BasePage.html cloud look like this body !-- some layout markup -- div class=content_left wicket:child / /div !-- more layout markup -- div class=content_rigt wicket:child / /div !-- even more layout markup -- /body And the Child.html markup would look like this: body div class=content_left wicket:extend !-- content of left column (first child) goes here -- /wicket:extend /div div class=content_rigt wicket:extend !-- content of right column (second child) goes here -- /wicket:extend /div /body Wouldn't that be a desirable feature? I tried to run the above example expecting to get an exception. The second wicket:child/wicket:extend pair was happily ignored though. Best regards, Stefan - --- Stefan Fußenegger http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com // looking for a nicer domain ;) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-%3Cwicket%3Achild--%3E-tags-on-a-single-base-page--tf4738673.html#a13610287 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JPA best-practices?
There's also qwicket.sf.net that specifically uses JPA+spring. I'm finishing up updates now for 1.3 support and improved project setup. SVN is your best bet there but I'm hoping to put up the new version this weekend. On Nov 9, 2007 10:04 AM, Francis De Brabandere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You might want to have a look at http://databinder.net, that project is using hibernate but the setup should be similar? The big problem is that a EntityManager is not thread-safe and should indeed be created per request. Let me know if you get there! On Nov 9, 2007 1:52 PM, Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi i plan to use JPA together with Wicket. Are there any battle-proven best-practices out there of how to handle EnityManagers and Transactions? What do other people use (no, not the spring crowd ;) ? One EntityManager per Request seems to be the obvious idea and a guice Provider may help with that. Does anyone have serious experiences with that or other suggestions? cu uwe -- THOMAS DAILY GmbH Adlerstraße 19 79098 Freiburg Deutschland T + 49 761 3 85 59 0 F + 49 761 3 85 59 550 E [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thomas-daily.de Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors: Wendy Thomas, Susanne Larbig Handelsregister Freiburg i.Br., HRB 3947 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JPA best-practices?
That's a definite feature i plan on adding as soon as I can. As a noted maven hater, though, it'll take some time and libations to help me swallow my pride. :) On Nov 12, 2007 3:47 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you know if theres any plans on making a maven2 archetype for qwicket? Evan Chooly wrote: There's also qwicket.sf.net that specifically uses JPA+spring. I'm finishing up updates now for 1.3 support and improved project setup. SVN is your best bet there but I'm hoping to put up the new version this weekend. On Nov 9, 2007 10:04 AM, Francis De Brabandere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You might want to have a look at http://databinder.net, that project is using hibernate but the setup should be similar? The big problem is that a EntityManager is not thread-safe and should indeed be created per request. Let me know if you get there! On Nov 9, 2007 1:52 PM, Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi i plan to use JPA together with Wicket. Are there any battle-proven best-practices out there of how to handle EnityManagers and Transactions? What do other people use (no, not the spring crowd ;) ? One EntityManager per Request seems to be the obvious idea and a guice Provider may help with that. Does anyone have serious experiences with that or other suggestions? cu uwe -- THOMAS DAILY GmbH Adlerstraße 19 79098 Freiburg Deutschland T + 49 761 3 85 59 0 F + 49 761 3 85 59 550 E [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thomas-daily.de Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors: Wendy Thomas, Susanne Larbig Handelsregister Freiburg i.Br., HRB 3947 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nino Martinez Wael Java Specialist @ Jayway DK http://www.jayway.dk +45 2936 7684 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with DefaultDataTable filtering?
bwahahahahaha. ahem. To each his own, I suppose. On Nov 13, 2007 12:26 AM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 12, 2007 6:33 PM, anita nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please unsubscribe Nah. Nick is a good guy. Let's keep him around ;-) Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
data tables and debugging session serialization
I'm having some strange behavior with a DataTable and the back button. When I back up to the page with the DT, it rerenders fine, but all my object state is gone. I click a link and the object is there but not the ID in the the object so that I get hibernate errors trying to load without an ID. I have some suspicions about my model objects but I'm not sure how to watch what gets stored in the session and what gets pulled back out when the page is rerendered due to the back button. Anyone have an idea of how I might track this down? Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
more back button fun
Using rc1 when I click on a link in a DataView, click the back button, and click on another link I get the following stack trace. Now, this data view is populated after an ajax update from another link on the page which might contribute to the problem. Any ideas what the story is? WicketMessage: component container:users:table:rows:3:cells:1:cell:link not found on page com.foo.BarPage[id = 2], listener interface = [RequestListenerInterface name=IBehaviorListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener.onRequest()] Root cause: org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: component container:users:table:rows:3:cells:1:cell:link not found on page com.foo.BarPage[id = 2], listener interface = [RequestListenerInterface name=IBehaviorListener, method=public abstract void org.apache.wicket.behavior.IBehaviorListener.onRequest()] at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.resolveListenerInterfaceTarget (AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:411) at org.apache.wicket.request.AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.resolveRenderedPage( AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.java:456) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycleProcessor.resolve( WebRequestCycleProcessor.java:139) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1152) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1248) at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:489) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:343) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet.doGet(WicketServlet.java :121) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:707) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:487) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter( ServletHandler.java:1093) at org.springframework.orm.jpa.support.OpenEntityManagerInViewFilter.doFilterInternal (OpenEntityManagerInViewFilter.java:111) at org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter( OncePerRequestFilter.java:75) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter( ServletHandler.java:1084) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:360) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java :216) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:181) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:712) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:405) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:139) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:313) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:506) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete( HttpConnection.java:830) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:514) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:211) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:381) at org.mortbay.jetty.bio.SocketConnector$Connection.run(SocketConnector.java :227) at org.mortbay.thread.BoundedThreadPool$PoolThread.run( BoundedThreadPool.java:442)
only 1 version of page in the cache at a time?
We have a page that presents a report in which we can drill down into the data. When this happens, we setResponsePage() back to a new instance of the page with some different parameters and that all works dandy. But when we hit the back button, it seems the old version is gone. All the model data comes back null (though the model object itself is not). So when we click back and then click another link to drilldown in another direction we get NPEs. From stepping through DiskPageStore, et. al, it would appear that since the page class isn't changing, the new page bumps the old one from the cache so that only one version of the page. Am I correctly interpreting what I'm seeing and is there a way to set the number of versions of a page?
Re: only 1 version of page in the cache at a time?
No transient fields. Everything is serializable. We're storing the complete objects in the model for a number of reasons. When we come back to the page we have some object but the state is gone. I think it's because we're redirecting back to the same page class/type so the old one gets dumped. Probably what I'll have to do,then, is to build special subclasses for the drilldown so that the page type changes on each step. Unless there's some way to increment the number of versions per pagemap... On Nov 27, 2007 11:39 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes in wicket 1.3 there is only 1 active page per pagemap But it shouldn't matter where the page comes from. If it is serialized from disk or serialized in the session somehow by the container, You still should be able to fully construct all your data again in the objects. So what is suddenly null? All the transient fields? Why aren't those reloaded from a database or something? johan On Nov 27, 2007 5:01 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a page that presents a report in which we can drill down into the data. When this happens, we setResponsePage() back to a new instance of the page with some different parameters and that all works dandy. But when we hit the back button, it seems the old version is gone. All the model data comes back null (though the model object itself is not). So when we click back and then click another link to drilldown in another direction we get NPEs. From stepping through DiskPageStore, et. al, it would appear that since the page class isn't changing, the new page bumps the old one from the cache so that only one version of the page. Am I correctly interpreting what I'm seeing and is there a way to set the number of versions of a page?
Re: only 1 version of page in the cache at a time?
No, they're detached versions which are basically clones so there's no hibernate proxies involved. On Nov 27, 2007 12:42 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: these objects are not by chance hibernate objects? because if you serialize and then deserialize all the collections come back as empty standard jdk collections instead of hibernate proxies sometimes -igor On Nov 27, 2007 8:49 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No transient fields. Everything is serializable. We're storing the complete objects in the model for a number of reasons. When we come back to the page we have some object but the state is gone. I think it's because we're redirecting back to the same page class/type so the old one gets dumped. Probably what I'll have to do,then, is to build special subclasses for the drilldown so that the page type changes on each step. Unless there's some way to increment the number of versions per pagemap... On Nov 27, 2007 11:39 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes in wicket 1.3 there is only 1 active page per pagemap But it shouldn't matter where the page comes from. If it is serialized from disk or serialized in the session somehow by the container, You still should be able to fully construct all your data again in the objects. So what is suddenly null? All the transient fields? Why aren't those reloaded from a database or something? johan On Nov 27, 2007 5:01 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a page that presents a report in which we can drill down into the data. When this happens, we setResponsePage() back to a new instance of the page with some different parameters and that all works dandy. But when we hit the back button, it seems the old version is gone. All the model data comes back null (though the model object itself is not). So when we click back and then click another link to drilldown in another direction we get NPEs. From stepping through DiskPageStore, et. al, it would appear that since the page class isn't changing, the new page bumps the old one from the cache so that only one version of the page. Am I correctly interpreting what I'm seeing and is there a way to set the number of versions of a page? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: only 1 version of page in the cache at a time?
just something like: setModel(new CompoundPropertyModel(report)); On Nov 27, 2007 1:04 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, so the model is there, but the object inside it suddenly is null? what kind of model is it? -igor On Nov 27, 2007 9:56 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, they're detached versions which are basically clones so there's no hibernate proxies involved. On Nov 27, 2007 12:42 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: these objects are not by chance hibernate objects? because if you serialize and then deserialize all the collections come back as empty standard jdk collections instead of hibernate proxies sometimes -igor On Nov 27, 2007 8:49 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No transient fields. Everything is serializable. We're storing the complete objects in the model for a number of reasons. When we come back to the page we have some object but the state is gone. I think it's because we're redirecting back to the same page class/type so the old one gets dumped. Probably what I'll have to do,then, is to build special subclasses for the drilldown so that the page type changes on each step. Unless there's some way to increment the number of versions per pagemap... On Nov 27, 2007 11:39 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes in wicket 1.3 there is only 1 active page per pagemap But it shouldn't matter where the page comes from. If it is serialized from disk or serialized in the session somehow by the container, You still should be able to fully construct all your data again in the objects. So what is suddenly null? All the transient fields? Why aren't those reloaded from a database or something? johan On Nov 27, 2007 5:01 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a page that presents a report in which we can drill down into the data. When this happens, we setResponsePage() back to a new instance of the page with some different parameters and that all works dandy. But when we hit the back button, it seems the old version is gone. All the model data comes back null (though the model object itself is not). So when we click back and then click another link to drilldown in another direction we get NPEs. From stepping through DiskPageStore, et. al, it would appear that since the page class isn't changing, the new page bumps the old one from the cache so that only one version of the page. Am I correctly interpreting what I'm seeing and is there a way to set the number of versions of a page? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: only 1 version of page in the cache at a time?
Just about every field in my model object. Though it would appear that the date object(s) is set to now. On Nov 27, 2007 2:23 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But what field is then exactly null??? On Nov 27, 2007 7:05 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: just something like: setModel(new CompoundPropertyModel(report)); On Nov 27, 2007 1:04 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, so the model is there, but the object inside it suddenly is null? what kind of model is it? -igor On Nov 27, 2007 9:56 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, they're detached versions which are basically clones so there's no hibernate proxies involved. On Nov 27, 2007 12:42 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: these objects are not by chance hibernate objects? because if you serialize and then deserialize all the collections come back as empty standard jdk collections instead of hibernate proxies sometimes -igor On Nov 27, 2007 8:49 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No transient fields. Everything is serializable. We're storing the complete objects in the model for a number of reasons. When we come back to the page we have some object but the state is gone. I think it's because we're redirecting back to the same page class/type so the old one gets dumped. Probably what I'll have to do,then, is to build special subclasses for the drilldown so that the page type changes on each step. Unless there's some way to increment the number of versions per pagemap... On Nov 27, 2007 11:39 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes in wicket 1.3 there is only 1 active page per pagemap But it shouldn't matter where the page comes from. If it is serialized from disk or serialized in the session somehow by the container, You still should be able to fully construct all your data again in the objects. So what is suddenly null? All the transient fields? Why aren't those reloaded from a database or something? johan On Nov 27, 2007 5:01 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a page that presents a report in which we can drill down into the data. When this happens, we setResponsePage() back to a new instance of the page with some different parameters and that all works dandy. But when we hit the back button, it seems the old version is gone. All the model data comes back null (though the model object itself is not). So when we click back and then click another link to drilldown in another direction we get NPEs. From stepping through DiskPageStore, et. al, it would appear that since the page class isn't changing, the new page bumps the old one from the cache so that only one version of the page. Am I correctly interpreting what I'm seeing and is there a way to set the number of versions of a page? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: only 1 version of page in the cache at a time?
Just a pojo. (that's right! i said it! pojo! pojo! pojo!) It does have a baseclass annotated with @MappedSuperclass but that shouldn't cause any problems. The object is created by calling new and is never touched by hibernate. On Nov 27, 2007 2:31 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what is this report object? -igor On Nov 27, 2007 11:27 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just about every field in my model object. Though it would appear that the date object(s) is set to now. On Nov 27, 2007 2:23 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But what field is then exactly null??? On Nov 27, 2007 7:05 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: just something like: setModel(new CompoundPropertyModel(report)); On Nov 27, 2007 1:04 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, so the model is there, but the object inside it suddenly is null? what kind of model is it? -igor On Nov 27, 2007 9:56 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, they're detached versions which are basically clones so there's no hibernate proxies involved. On Nov 27, 2007 12:42 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: these objects are not by chance hibernate objects? because if you serialize and then deserialize all the collections come back as empty standard jdk collections instead of hibernate proxies sometimes -igor On Nov 27, 2007 8:49 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No transient fields. Everything is serializable. We're storing the complete objects in the model for a number of reasons. When we come back to the page we have some object but the state is gone. I think it's because we're redirecting back to the same page class/type so the old one gets dumped. Probably what I'll have to do,then, is to build special subclasses for the drilldown so that the page type changes on each step. Unless there's some way to increment the number of versions per pagemap... On Nov 27, 2007 11:39 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes in wicket 1.3 there is only 1 active page per pagemap But it shouldn't matter where the page comes from. If it is serialized from disk or serialized in the session somehow by the container, You still should be able to fully construct all your data again in the objects. So what is suddenly null? All the transient fields? Why aren't those reloaded from a database or something? johan On Nov 27, 2007 5:01 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a page that presents a report in which we can drill down into the data. When this happens, we setResponsePage() back to a new instance of the page with some different parameters and that all works dandy. But when we hit the back button, it seems the old version is gone. All the model data comes back null (though the model object itself is not). So when we click back and then click another link to drilldown in another direction we get NPEs. From stepping through DiskPageStore, et. al, it would appear that since the page class isn't changing, the new page bumps the old one from the cache so that only one version of the page. Am I correctly interpreting what I'm seeing and is there a way to set the number of versions of a page? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: only 1 version of page in the cache at a time?
Thanks for the tip, igor. i wasn't sure how to get at the serialization code directly without going through all the page stuff as well. (DetachedReport)Objects.cloneObject(report) does indeed return an empty Report object so there's something not quite right there. At least now I have a place i can focus on without having to worry about all the other wicket layers. I'll let you know what I find out. On Nov 27, 2007 2:36 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: run it through Objects.clone() and see what you get back -igor On Nov 27, 2007 11:35 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a pojo. (that's right! i said it! pojo! pojo! pojo!) It does have a baseclass annotated with @MappedSuperclass but that shouldn't cause any problems. The object is created by calling new and is never touched by hibernate. On Nov 27, 2007 2:31 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what is this report object? -igor On Nov 27, 2007 11:27 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just about every field in my model object. Though it would appear that the date object(s) is set to now. On Nov 27, 2007 2:23 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But what field is then exactly null??? On Nov 27, 2007 7:05 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: just something like: setModel(new CompoundPropertyModel(report)); On Nov 27, 2007 1:04 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, so the model is there, but the object inside it suddenly is null? what kind of model is it? -igor On Nov 27, 2007 9:56 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, they're detached versions which are basically clones so there's no hibernate proxies involved. On Nov 27, 2007 12:42 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: these objects are not by chance hibernate objects? because if you serialize and then deserialize all the collections come back as empty standard jdk collections instead of hibernate proxies sometimes -igor On Nov 27, 2007 8:49 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No transient fields. Everything is serializable. We're storing the complete objects in the model for a number of reasons. When we come back to the page we have some object but the state is gone. I think it's because we're redirecting back to the same page class/type so the old one gets dumped. Probably what I'll have to do,then, is to build special subclasses for the drilldown so that the page type changes on each step. Unless there's some way to increment the number of versions per pagemap... On Nov 27, 2007 11:39 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes in wicket 1.3 there is only 1 active page per pagemap But it shouldn't matter where the page comes from. If it is serialized from disk or serialized in the session somehow by the container, You still should be able to fully construct all your data again in the objects. So what is suddenly null? All the transient fields? Why aren't those reloaded from a database or something? johan On Nov 27, 2007 5:01 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a page that presents a report in which we can drill down into the data. When this happens, we setResponsePage() back to a new instance of the page with some different parameters and that all works dandy. But when we hit the back button, it seems the old version is gone. All the model data comes back null (though the model object itself is not). So when we click back and then click another link to drilldown in another direction we get NPEs. From stepping through DiskPageStore, et. al, it would appear that since the page class isn't changing, the new page bumps the old one from the cache so that only one version of the page. Am I correctly interpreting what I'm seeing and is there a way to set the number of versions of a page
Today's installment of well, duh. Was: Re: only 1 version of page in the cache at a time?
So here's the skinny: while my subclass was marked as serializable, the parent class was not. So no state from the parent class got serialized nor, not so surprisingly, deserialized. After adding that implements clause things miraculously started working. So a big you idiot for me and a big thanks to igor for pointing me to the Objects.cloneObject() method to help write unit tests to highlight my otherwise obvious error. On Nov 27, 2007 5:29 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the tip, igor. i wasn't sure how to get at the serialization code directly without going through all the page stuff as well. (DetachedReport)Objects.cloneObject(report) does indeed return an empty Report object so there's something not quite right there. At least now I have a place i can focus on without having to worry about all the other wicket layers. I'll let you know what I find out. On Nov 27, 2007 2:36 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: run it through Objects.clone() and see what you get back -igor On Nov 27, 2007 11:35 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a pojo. (that's right! i said it! pojo! pojo! pojo!) It does have a baseclass annotated with @MappedSuperclass but that shouldn't cause any problems. The object is created by calling new and is never touched by hibernate. On Nov 27, 2007 2:31 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what is this report object? -igor On Nov 27, 2007 11:27 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just about every field in my model object. Though it would appear that the date object(s) is set to now. On Nov 27, 2007 2:23 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But what field is then exactly null??? On Nov 27, 2007 7:05 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: just something like: setModel(new CompoundPropertyModel(report)); On Nov 27, 2007 1:04 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, so the model is there, but the object inside it suddenly is null? what kind of model is it? -igor On Nov 27, 2007 9:56 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, they're detached versions which are basically clones so there's no hibernate proxies involved. On Nov 27, 2007 12:42 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: these objects are not by chance hibernate objects? because if you serialize and then deserialize all the collections come back as empty standard jdk collections instead of hibernate proxies sometimes -igor On Nov 27, 2007 8:49 AM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No transient fields. Everything is serializable. We're storing the complete objects in the model for a number of reasons. When we come back to the page we have some object but the state is gone. I think it's because we're redirecting back to the same page class/type so the old one gets dumped. Probably what I'll have to do,then, is to build special subclasses for the drilldown so that the page type changes on each step. Unless there's some way to increment the number of versions per pagemap... On Nov 27, 2007 11:39 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes in wicket 1.3 there is only 1 active page per pagemap But it shouldn't matter where the page comes from. If it is serialized from disk or serialized in the session somehow by the container, You still should be able to fully construct all your data again in the objects. So what is suddenly null? All the transient fields? Why aren't those reloaded from a database or something? johan On Nov 27, 2007 5:01 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a page that presents a report in which we can drill down into the data. When this happens, we setResponsePage() back to a new instance of the page with some different parameters and that all works dandy. But when we hit the back button, it seems the old version is gone. All the model
Re: Today's installment of well, duh. Was: Re: only 1 version of page in the cache at a time?
I actually *do* have that, but this code recently went through some ... surgery that left things in a rather sloppy state. Clearly not the most prize worthy section of code. :) On Nov 27, 2007 10:43 PM, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Evan Chooly wrote: So here's the skinny: while my subclass was marked as serializable, the parent class was not. So no state from the parent class got serialized nor, not so surprisingly, deserialized. After adding that implements clause things miraculously started working. So a big you idiot for me and a big thanks to igor for pointing me to the Objects.cloneObject() method to help write unit tests to highlight my otherwise obvious error. In an earlier project I also made a check on the main page that serialised it to memory on every request in development mode. It might be a good idea to do something like this but make it check that the cloned object is equal to the original. Yours is a nasty case as in that serialisation seems to fail (or rather work in a broken way) silently. For persistent objects (you said the parent class was a @MappedSuperclass right?) it often makes sense to make them inherit or implement a common base class / interface that implements / extends Serializable. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is wicket-contrib-jasperreports alive?
The project lives in svn in the wicket-stuff repo. Last I worked with it, I had started migrating it to wicket 1.3 but that was back when there was a wicket 2.0 in the works. It should still be compatible with today's 1.3 but I haven't touched it in months as I haven't had to use JR in sometime. But barring any API drift in wicket, it should compile and work just fine. On Nov 30, 2007 2:35 AM, Newgro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi *, i'm realy interested in this. The cvs link i found in old mailing list has gone. Someone knows the state here? Thanks Per -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-wicket-contrib-jasperreports-alive--tf4902030.html#a14042012 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Resizable and reorderable grid components
this is very cool to start. i'm working on a similar component. my biggest complaint is that it seems odd to me that commercial component demos are being hosted on wicket stuff. but that just might be me. Other than that, they look pretty sharp. On Jan 10, 2008 3:42 PM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am pleased to announce that the first beta version of TreeGrid and DataGrid components is available. Amongst other things these support column resizing and reordering, horizontal and vertical scrolling (with fixed header) and multi-column sorting. The components are commercial, but with no need to have per-developer licenses or any royalties. For more information and a live demo see http://www.inmethod.com . Regards, Matej Knopp - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Resizable and reorderable grid components
I completely agree, actually. I'm not opposed to the idea it just kinda struck me as odd at the time. I'm not entirely sure why, but there it is. Having one place even as a jumping off point would certainly help adoption. I know what I was trying to convince my current company to use wicket the question of where else is it used came up several times. Something like that would certainly have helped. On Jan 12, 2008 4:27 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like it! Who knows... JSF keeps rambling about a market place for custom component libraries, .net has such a market place. I don't see why we shouldn't try to pursuit such an avenue. Martijn On Jan 12, 2008 8:47 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there would be a market for commercial components then i can see the value of wicketstuff.org/marketplace for such components, commercial or not its still stuff for wicket On 1/11/08, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is that not the official website for the wicket stuff projects? Just kinda struck me as odd is all. On Jan 10, 2008 6:26 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dont really see this as that weird. its a private server... -igor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Resizable and reorderable grid components
No, not really. I knew about and used that page. But one of the questions that came up was about prebuilt components and the like. We used a number of wiki pages and the examples page and others to ultimately push wicket through. But a showcase of components being used beyond the rather vanilla components on the examples page might have made the conversations easier. On Jan 12, 2008 7:25 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 12, 2008 12:50 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know what I was trying to convince my current company to use wicket the question of where else is it used came up several times. Something like that would certainly have helped. you mean http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/#Index-SitesusingWicket -igor On Jan 12, 2008 4:27 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like it! Who knows... JSF keeps rambling about a market place for custom component libraries, .net has such a market place. I don't see why we shouldn't try to pursuit such an avenue. Martijn On Jan 12, 2008 8:47 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there would be a market for commercial components then i can see the value of wicketstuff.org/marketplace for such components, commercial or not its still stuff for wicket On 1/11/08, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is that not the official website for the wicket stuff projects? Just kinda struck me as odd is all. On Jan 10, 2008 6:26 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dont really see this as that weird. its a private server... -igor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Resizable and reorderable grid components
well, for example, while DefaultDataTable does the bulk of what we needed, it's not the easiest to extend when you start looking at toolbars and ordering and the like. Some of what we needed was more chrome, but some of it is alterations of some of the functionaly. None of it was hard to do by any stretch. But seeing how easy/common it is to do such things before having written code would've greased the skids with the pro-tapestry participants. But wicket won so it wasn't a showstopper. Just would've been nice. On Jan 13, 2008 12:01 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what matej built isnt that far from the examples we have of datatable and tree/treetable. he added a ton more chrome, but in terms of functionality they are pretty much the same... so exactly what kinds of components would it be nice to see? a weather widget? -igor On Jan 12, 2008 7:57 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, not really. I knew about and used that page. But one of the questions that came up was about prebuilt components and the like. We used a number of wiki pages and the examples page and others to ultimately push wicket through. But a showcase of components being used beyond the rather vanilla components on the examples page might have made the conversations easier. On Jan 12, 2008 7:25 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 12, 2008 12:50 PM, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know what I was trying to convince my current company to use wicket the question of where else is it used came up several times. Something like that would certainly have helped. you mean http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/#Index-SitesusingWicket -igor On Jan 12, 2008 4:27 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like it! Who knows... JSF keeps rambling about a market place for custom component libraries, .net has such a market place. I don't see why we shouldn't try to pursuit such an avenue. Martijn On Jan 12, 2008 8:47 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there would be a market for commercial components then i can see the value of wicketstuff.org/marketplace for such components, commercial or not its still stuff for wicket On 1/11/08, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is that not the official website for the wicket stuff projects? Just kinda struck me as odd is all. On Jan 10, 2008 6:26 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dont really see this as that weird. its a private server... -igor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to create a PDF file - NotSerializableException
You should probably look into using Resources. the wicketcontrib-jasperreports has this done for you already. On Jan 15, 2008 12:01 PM, Marco Aurélio Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I'm trying to create a PDF file with Jasper inside a page with wicket 1.2.6, but I'm getting an exception: Root cause: java.io.NotSerializableException: org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContextFacade . . Complete stack: wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Internal error cloning object. Make sure all dependent objects implement Serializable. The code that is causing the Exception, is this: JasperRunManager.runReportToPdfStream(context.getResourceAsStream (WEB-INF/reports/scanPdf/creditScanPdf.jasper),outputStream,map, new ScanPdf(new ArrayList())); I tried to put this inside a LoadableDetachableModel, but no success. Any help is welcome! Thank you Marco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: best practice for a wait page
What about IndicatingAjaxButton?
On Jan 24, 2008 1:16 PM, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll try Thijs' suggestion first, but if the unforseen arises I might
try a meta refresh. Thank Nick.
On Jan 24, 2008 9:48 AM, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could set a flag in the user's session indicating the process is
ongoing, then use a meta refresh to check the status of the flag and
respond
accordingly.
On Jan 24, 2008 11:45 AM, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a page with a form and the form's onSubmit() method takes a
while. After it is complete the user is re-directed to another page.
We'd like to introduce a nice please wait while we process your
request page in between these pages. If anyone has done this, what
approach has worked well for you?
public class Page1 extends ...
{
...
add(new SomeForm()
{
public void onSubmit()
{
aBunchOfProcessing();
redirect(new Page2());
}
}
...
}
Thank you,
Scott
--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Nick Heudecker
Professional Wicket Training Consulting
http://www.systemmobile.com
Eventful - Intelligent Event Management
http://www.eventfulhq.com
--
Scott Swank
reformed mathematician
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
