[vchkpw] Domain limits
Hi, I have been using vpopmail with user quota's for some time now. I want to move to domainlimits, is it possible to set the user quota to -1 and domainquota to say 500 MB on a domain. If the 500 MB is reached for the domain will the emails be bounced or does vpopmail accept it because the user limit has -1? Regards, Bas
Re: [vchkpw] Domain limits
Thanks for the quick reply. I will turn it back off, I noticed it didn't work as I expected. Bas At 18:00 8/5/2005, you wrote: Bastiaan van der Put wrote: Hi, I have been using vpopmail with user quota's for some time now. I want to move to domainlimits, is it possible to set the user quota to -1 and domainquota to say 500 MB on a domain. If the 500 MB is reached for the domain will the emails be bounced or does vpopmail accept it because the user limit has -1? Hi, Domain quotas do not work. The only available option is to use system quotas and create a new user for each domain. Regards, Rick
Re: [vchkpw] Domain limits
Hmm I noticed I didnt compile with domainquota's the first time. After compiling with the support, I do get a bounce msg now the user is overquota?? user limit = -1 Domainquota = 16 MB(just to test) What exact is broken about it? Bas At 18:00 8/5/2005, you wrote: Bastiaan van der Put wrote: Hi, I have been using vpopmail with user quota's for some time now. I want to move to domainlimits, is it possible to set the user quota to -1 and domainquota to say 500 MB on a domain. If the 500 MB is reached for the domain will the emails be bounced or does vpopmail accept it because the user limit has -1? Hi, Domain quotas do not work. The only available option is to use system quotas and create a new user for each domain. Regards, Rick
Re: [vchkpw] Domain limits
What exact is broken about it? Seems it only bounces emails with attachments. Bas At 18:00 8/5/2005, you wrote: Bastiaan van der Put wrote: Hi, I have been using vpopmail with user quota's for some time now. I want to move to domainlimits, is it possible to set the user quota to -1 and domainquota to say 500 MB on a domain. If the 500 MB is reached for the domain will the emails be bounced or does vpopmail accept it because the user limit has -1? Hi, Domain quotas do not work. The only available option is to use system quotas and create a new user for each domain. Regards, Rick
Re: [vchkpw] simscan quesiton: error
Check the permissions on the working dir too. Bas At 17:25 9/24/2004, you wrote: On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 09:41:09AM -0500, Ken Jones wrote: If you are not running qmail-smtpd as root you may need to change the ownership of simscan to match qmail-smtpd. I run qmail-smtpd as qmaild and now I have, # ls -l simscan -rwxr-xr-x 1 qmaild nofiles 6136 Sep 24 11:25 simscan Still the same problem. I am running Mandrake 10.0 With warm regards, -Payal
RE: [vchkpw] Announcement: simscan devel version 1.0.3 available
Probably the user running qmail, and user rights to exec simscan. Had the same. Bas At 20:20 9/15/2004, you wrote: tested on our dev box... redhat 9 netqmail 1.04 spamassassin clamav make runs well install is easy just a small problem I get a 451 unable to exec qq (#4.3.0) error when attempting to deliver mail I don't think I have set the env correctly... what is wrong with this qmail-smtp run file ??? (fyi tring it without the vpopmail components for now) that it cant run the qmailq env - PATH=/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH \ QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan \ /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2000 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -l $LOCAL -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \ -c $MAXSMTPD -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp\ /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -b -r relays.ordb.org -r blackholes.mail-abuse.org \ -r list.dsbl.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r sbl.spamhaus.org \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 21 -Original Message- From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 13, 2004 13:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] Announcement: simscan devel version 1.0.3 available Simscan devel version 1.0.3 is available. See: http://www.inter7.com/?page=simscan It would be great if anyone could test it or review the code. It works on our RedHat 9 machine. Changes 1. spamassassin scanning now passes along all the spamassassin modified email. 2. spamassassin rejection uses the X-Spam-Flag: Yes header to determine if an email should be rejected instead of using spamc with the -c option. 3. New --enable-spam-hits=hit_number option allows you to reject based on the calculated hits value instead of the X-Spam-Flag: Yes header. 4. New --enable-per-domain option allows you to enable clamav scanning or spamassassin scanning on a per domain basis. Includes new simscanmk program to create the contant database files (.cdb) used to determine which domains to enable spam or virus checking for. 5. simscan now runs setuid as the simscan user for security. 6. Updated documentation. -- Thanks, Ken Jones inter7.com __ NOD32 1.855 (20040901) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System. http://www.nod32.com
Re: [vchkpw] Announcement: simscan devel version 1.0.3 available
Hi, I am trying to comiple on WBEL 3.0(RH EL 3.0) ./configure --enable-spam=y --enable-workdir=/var/simcsan --enable-spam-hits=15 make gives ake[2]: Leaving directory `/temp/simscan-1.0.3/cdb' make[2]: Entering directory `/temp/simscan-1.0.3' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -O2 -Wall -c `test -f 'simscan.c' || echo './'`simscan.c simscan.c: In function `check_spam': simscan.c:442: `debug_fs' undeclared (first use in this function) simscan.c:442: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once simscan.c:442: for each function it appears in.) simscan.c:443: warning: double format, different type arg (arg 4) make[2]: *** [simscan.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/temp/simscan-1.0.3' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/temp/simscan-1.0.3' make: *** [all] Error 2 Regards, Bas At 20:33 9/13/2004, you wrote: Simscan devel version 1.0.3 is available. See: http://www.inter7.com/?page=simscan It would be great if anyone could test it or review the code. It works on our RedHat 9 machine. Changes 1. spamassassin scanning now passes along all the spamassassin modified email. 2. spamassassin rejection uses the X-Spam-Flag: Yes header to determine if an email should be rejected instead of using spamc with the -c option. 3. New --enable-spam-hits=hit_number option allows you to reject based on the calculated hits value instead of the X-Spam-Flag: Yes header. 4. New --enable-per-domain option allows you to enable clamav scanning or spamassassin scanning on a per domain basis. Includes new simscanmk program to create the contant database files (.cdb) used to determine which domains to enable spam or virus checking for. 5. simscan now runs setuid as the simscan user for security. 6. Updated documentation. -- Thanks, Ken Jones inter7.com
Re: [vchkpw] simscan test release: simplified scanner for clamav/spamassassin
Ken, Is it possible to scan for spam and use tagging only, not rejecting the msg? Greetings, Bas At 19:43 7/29/2004, you wrote: Here you go Ken The installation instructions are in the INSTALL file On Thursday 29 July 2004 12:18 pm, Shane Chrisp wrote: Please send me a copy Ken. cheers Shane -Original Message- From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 28 July 2004 1:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] simscan test release: simplified scanner for clamav/spamassassin Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it? It is a simplified replacement for qscanq. We have been running it on our server for over a week and it is solid. Like qscanq it can call clamdscan to check for viri. It is invoked via the QMAILQUEUE patch. Differences: - uses configure ; make ; make install-strip - automatically deletes working directories when done - uses one program instead of qscanq's two programs per email - optionally calls spamassassin to reject spam during smtp - optionally blocks list of attachments - does not require svscan - simplified C code (one simscan.c file) If you are interested, please email me directly and I'll send you a tar ball. -- Ken Jones inter7.com
RE: [vchkpw] VLOG....aaarrrrrggggg!!!!
Well people who use mysql, know from the first time what you were talking about. The reaction of the unknown seems a bit offense Don't think there is some otherway then just write a delete script, and put it in cron or somthing similair. Greetings, Bas At 19:36 4/13/2004, you wrote: Sorry for the confusion Jeremy. I am using VPOPMAIL with the MySQL database option. The vlog table (--enable-mysql-logging) allows to maintain the vpopmail's vlog table in MySQL (shows failed authentication requests). MySQL and VPOPMAIL - http://www.pipeline.com.au/staff/mbowe/isp/vpopmail-mysql.htm Cheers, peter -Original Message- From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 2:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] VLOGaaarg On Tuesday 13 April 2004 12:12 pm, Peter Morin wrote: [fixed broken quoting, please fix your MUA] Just curious. My VLOG has grown to over a gig..is there a more elegant way to rotating this than the normal delete vlog? Has anyone scripted this? Perhaps you posted to the wrong mailing list by accident? Is this not the list for vpopmail issues? I guess I don't know what you're talking about when you talk about 'vlog' vpopmail I believe logs to syslog, and if you're having syslog issues you should be asking either your OS vendor, or the list of the system logger you're running. If there's something else you're talking about, perhaps you could expand on your original question to let us know exactly what you're talking about. -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kitchen @ #qmail on EFNet - Join the party! . Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. www.inter7.com 866.528.3530 toll free 847.492.0470 int'l 847.492.0632 fax GNUPG key ID: 93BDD6CE
Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and qmail smtp-auth patch, cram-md5 problem
At 23:36 2/25/2004, you wrote: On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 07:33, Martin Kos wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Tom Collins wrote: from README.auth: There is no need to include additionally the hostname in the call. is this new? .. i've thought there was some time ago some rumor about people that haven't added the hostname in the commandline of qmail-smtpd and have had an open relay or so? it seems to change every week. not version 0.31 of that patch required the hostname argument. earlier versions didn't, great for consistency! From UPGRADE : IF USING SMTP AUTH PATCH TO QMAIL-SMTPD * This release of vpopmail includes fixes for vchkpw that may break certain SMTP AUTH implementations. If SMTP AUTH fails after installing vpopmail 5.4.x, you may need to use the qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2 patch included in the contrib directory. * If you do switch to the 0.4.2 SMTP AUTH patch, you may need to update your qmail-smtpd run file (the first parameter to qmail-smtpd should now be the path to vchkpw and not the hostname). Seems clear to me Greetings Bas -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kitchen @ #qmail on EFNet - Join the party! . Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. www.inter7.com 866.528.3530 toll free 847.492.0470 int'l 847.492.0632 fax GNUPG key ID: 93BDD6CE
