Re: weird LaTeX highlighting in updated vim6.4
* El 12/04/06 a las 8:53, Charles E Campbell Jr chamullaba: > > >> I've always had some special highlighting for TeX > > >>files. For example, I have the following syn for "$$": > > >> > > >>hi dollars cterm=bold ctermfg=7 ctermbg=4 guifg=white guibg=blue > > >>syn match dollars /\(\$\$\|\\\[\|\\\]\)/ > > >> > > >> > > ... > > But your (and Benji's) solution gives rise to another problem: > > If I add containedin=ALL, or containedin=texDocZone, the "$$" > > are properly highlighted, but then 80% of the "}" in the > > manuscript are highlighted like errors, white over red (??!!). > > > > Another problem that I have (but this one I always had) is that > > the highlighting of the "$$" destroys the normal highlighting > > of the math zone, and errors appear inside the $$ ... $$. > > But I assume it has to do with the contained-contains stuff. > > > > I tried, then: > > > > hi dolares cterm=bold ctermfg=7 ctermbg=4 guifg=white guibg=blue > > syn match dolares contained /\(\$\$\|\\\[\|\\\]\)/ containedin=ALL > > > > but, still, the two problems persist: 80% of the "}" are marked > > as errors, and the syntax inside the $$ ... $$ is destroyed. > > > > Do you have a suggestion? I really don't get how this works. > > > > > > Look into syntax/tex.vim. The $$ ... $$ is recognized as a texMathZoneY > (normally). > Now, your syntax item (dolares) occurs later, so it has priority; hence, > the texMathZoneY > is bypassed by your extra syntax. > > What you've wanted is to change the highlighting of $$. Currently, the > texMathZoneY uses > Delimiter for the highlighting of the $$s. Now, I haven't tested this, > but one way to do this is > to overwrite the texMathZoneY: > > syn clear texMathZoneY > syn region texMathZoneYmatchgroup=Delimiter start="\$\$" > matchgroup=Delimiter end="\$\$" end="%stopzone\>"keepend > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This clears the texMathZoneY and then re-installs it. It does have a > high priority (because its being done > most recently) but I don't think that should be a problem. Now, change > the "Delimiter" to "dolares". Include > your dolares highlighting specification. Finally, put it into > after/syntax/tex.vim (so that it gets loaded after > usual syntax/tex.vim highlighting for ft=tex files). I think that'll do it! Ok, motivated by what you said about the syntax folding, I solved my problem, by adding this: syn clear texDocZone syn clear texSectionZone syn clear texSubSectionZone syn clear texSubSubSectionZone syn clear texParaZone syn clear texChapterZone Now everything works fine (since I don't use syntax folding). I think this somehow broke the containedin option. Thanks! L.
Re: weird LaTeX highlighting in updated vim6.4
* El 12/04/06 a las 8:53, Charles E Campbell Jr chamullaba:
> Luis A. Florit wrote:
>
> > >> I've always had some special highlighting for TeX
> > >>files. For example, I have the following syn for "$$":
> > >>
> > >>hi dollars cterm=bold ctermfg=7 ctermbg=4 guifg=white guibg=blue
> > >>syn match dollars /\(\$\$\|\\\[\|\\\]\)/
> > >>
> > >>
> > ...
> > But your (and Benji's) solution gives rise to another problem:
> > If I add containedin=ALL, or containedin=texDocZone, the "$$"
> > are properly highlighted, but then 80% of the "}" in the
> > manuscript are highlighted like errors, white over red (??!!).
> >
> > Another problem that I have (but this one I always had) is that
> > the highlighting of the "$$" destroys the normal highlighting
> > of the math zone, and errors appear inside the $$ ... $$.
> > But I assume it has to do with the contained-contains stuff.
> >
> > I tried, then:
> >
> > hi dolares cterm=bold ctermfg=7 ctermbg=4 guifg=white guibg=blue
> > syn match dolares contained /\(\$\$\|\\\[\|\\\]\)/ containedin=ALL
> >
> > but, still, the two problems persist: 80% of the "}" are marked
> > as errors, and the syntax inside the $$ ... $$ is destroyed.
> >
> > Do you have a suggestion? I really don't get how this works.
> >
> >
>
> Look into syntax/tex.vim. The $$ ... $$ is recognized as
> a texMathZoneY (normally). Now, your syntax item (dolares) occurs
> later, so it has priority; hence, the texMathZoneY is bypassed by
> your extra syntax.
Got it!
> What you've wanted is to change the highlighting of $$. Currently,
> the texMathZoneY uses Delimiter for the highlighting of the $$s.
> Now, I haven't tested this, but one way to do this is to overwrite
> the texMathZoneY:
>
> syn clear texMathZoneY
> syn region texMathZoneY matchgroup=Delimiter start="\$\$"
> matchgroup=Delimiter end="\$\$" end="%stopzone\>" keepend
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This clears the texMathZoneY and then re-installs it. It does have
> a high priority (because its being done most recently) but I don't
> think that should be a problem. Now, change the "Delimiter" to
> "dolares". Include your dolares highlighting specification. Finally,
> put it into after/syntax/tex.vim (so that it gets loaded after usual
> syntax/tex.vim highlighting for ft=tex files). I think that'll do it!
Indeed!
Now $$ is highlighted as I wanted, and the syntax preserved inside.
No "containedin=..." needed.
However (why there is always a however?), the other problem persists.
I want to highlight, say, the beginning and end of proofs, and my old
highlighting does nothing:
hi proof cterm=bold ctermfg=black ctermbg=cyan guifg=black guibg=cyan
syn match proof /\(\\\(begin{\|end{\)\?proof[}]\?\)\|\(\\qed\)/
Adding "containedin=" highlights the patterns, BUT then that
also highlights most "}" as errors (this sounds like a bug in the
highlighting syntax to me...)
If the file after/syntax/tex.vim only contains this two lines
hi proof cterm=bold ctermfg=black ctermbg=cyan guifg=black guibg=cyan
syn match proof /\\qed/ containedin=ALL
then most "}" are highlighted as errors. I can grab the screen and
post it on my webpage if needed. The "containedin=ALL" seems to
have some problem.
Thanks a lot!!
L.
Re: weird LaTeX highlighting in updated vim6.4
Luis A. Florit wrote: * El 11/04/06 a las 9:58, Charles E Campbell Jr chamullaba: Luis A. Florit wrote: I've always had some special highlighting for TeX files. For example, I have the following syn for "$$": hi dollars cterm=bold ctermfg=7 ctermbg=4 guifg=white guibg=blue syn match dollars /\(\$\$\|\\\[\|\\\]\)/ ... But your (and Benji's) solution gives rise to another problem: If I add containedin=ALL, or containedin=texDocZone, the "$$" are properly highlighted, but then 80% of the "}" in the manuscript are highlighted like errors, white over red (??!!). Another problem that I have (but this one I always had) is that the highlighting of the "$$" destroys the normal highlighting of the math zone, and errors appear inside the $$ ... $$. But I assume it has to do with the contained-contains stuff. I tried, then: hi dolares cterm=bold ctermfg=7 ctermbg=4 guifg=white guibg=blue syn match dolares contained /\(\$\$\|\\\[\|\\\]\)/ containedin=ALL but, still, the two problems persist: 80% of the "}" are marked as errors, and the syntax inside the $$ ... $$ is destroyed. Do you have a suggestion? I really don't get how this works. Look into syntax/tex.vim. The $$ ... $$ is recognized as a texMathZoneY (normally). Now, your syntax item (dolares) occurs later, so it has priority; hence, the texMathZoneY is bypassed by your extra syntax. What you've wanted is to change the highlighting of $$. Currently, the texMathZoneY uses Delimiter for the highlighting of the $$s. Now, I haven't tested this, but one way to do this is to overwrite the texMathZoneY: syn clear texMathZoneY syn region texMathZoneYmatchgroup=Delimiter start="\$\$" matchgroup=Delimiter end="\$\$" end="%stopzone\>"keepend [EMAIL PROTECTED] This clears the texMathZoneY and then re-installs it. It does have a high priority (because its being done most recently) but I don't think that should be a problem. Now, change the "Delimiter" to "dolares". Include your dolares highlighting specification. Finally, put it into after/syntax/tex.vim (so that it gets loaded after usual syntax/tex.vim highlighting for ft=tex files). I think that'll do it! Regards, Chip Campbell
Re: weird LaTeX highlighting in updated vim6.4
* El 11/04/06 a las 9:58, Charles E Campbell Jr chamullaba:
> Luis A. Florit wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've always had some special highlighting for TeX
> > files. For example, I have the following syn for "$$":
> >
> > hi dollars cterm=bold ctermfg=7 ctermbg=4 guifg=white guibg=blue
> > syn match dollars /\(\$\$\|\\\[\|\\\]\)/
> >
> > It always worked nicely, but since I upgraded to FC5,
> > and then from vim6.3 to vim6.4, the highlighting only
> > works BEFORE the '\begin{document}', and not after
> > (not very useful...). This persist even if I remove
> > my .vimrc, or my .vim directory, so it is some new
> > problem with version 6.4.
> >
> > Any idea about what is happening??
>
> As Benji F said, you'll need to get it contained (at least in
> texDocZone). containedin=ALL
> should work, but it will of course then be contained in all groups,
> including comments.
>
> The texDocZone group was set up to facilitate syntax-based folding.
I understand.
I tried a lot to make syntax-based folding in 6.3, and I gave up...
marked folding is much faster, anyway, and trivial.
I like coward solutions... :)
But your (and Benji's) solution gives rise to another problem:
If I add containedin=ALL, or containedin=texDocZone, the "$$"
are properly highlighted, but then 80% of the "}" in the
manuscript are highlighted like errors, white over red (??!!).
Another problem that I have (but this one I always had) is that
the highlighting of the "$$" destroys the normal highlighting
of the math zone, and errors appear inside the $$ ... $$.
But I assume it has to do with the contained-contains stuff.
I tried, then:
hi dolares cterm=bold ctermfg=7 ctermbg=4 guifg=white guibg=blue
syn match dolares contained /\(\$\$\|\\\[\|\\\]\)/ containedin=ALL
but, still, the two problems persist: 80% of the "}" are marked
as errors, and the syntax inside the $$ ... $$ is destroyed.
Do you have a suggestion? I really don't get how this works.
Thanks for your patience...
Cheers,
Luis.
Re: weird LaTeX highlighting in updated vim6.4
Benji,
* El 10/04/06 a las 23:01, Benji Fisher chamullaba:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:06:12PM -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've always had some special highlighting for TeX
> > files. For example, I have the following syn for "$$":
> >
> > hi dollars cterm=bold ctermfg=7 ctermbg=4 guifg=white guibg=blue
> > syn match dollars /\(\$\$\|\\\[\|\\\]\)/
> >
> > It always worked nicely, but since I upgraded to FC5,
> > and then from vim6.3 to vim6.4, the highlighting only
> > works BEFORE the '\begin{document}', and not after
> > (not very useful...). This persist even if I remove
> > my .vimrc, or my .vim directory, so it is some new
> > problem with version 6.4.
> >
> > Any idea about what is happening??
> >
> > Thanks a lot,
> >
> > Luis.
>
> Probably your $$ occurs inside some syntax region, so it is not
> recognized. A simple fix might be to add "containedin=ALL" to
> the "syn match" line.
>
> :help containedin
Almost!
If I do that, they are propperly highlighted, but then all
the "}" in the manuscript are then highlighted as errors (??!!).
What changed in tex.vim? It worked so nicely in Vim 6.3...
From Charles:
> As Benji F said, you'll need to get it contained (at least in
> texDocZone). containedin=ALL
> should work, but it will of course then be contained in all groups,
> including comments.
>
> The texDocZone group was set up to facilitate syntax-based folding.
Has the same side effect...
> > PS:
> > BTW, we are receiving a several spam and virus from vim mailing list.
> > Not that matters a lot to me, with Linux, SpamAssassin and Clamav,
> > but for windows users... The strange thing is that I needed to change
> > my "From " first header through sendmail to be able to post in Vim
> > mailing list: the most strict list I belong, and the only one with SPAM.
> > Perhaps some tunning needed?
> >
> > Thanks again. L.
>
> Since there was a big problem with the mail servers a few weeks
> ago, I think the plan is to move the lists to a new server ASAP after
> vim 7.0 is released. I expect some tuning (tunning?) to take place
> then.
Good!
Thanks,
Luis.
Re: weird LaTeX highlighting in updated vim6.4
Luis A. Florit wrote:
Hi all,
I've always had some special highlighting for TeX
files. For example, I have the following syn for "$$":
hi dollars cterm=bold ctermfg=7 ctermbg=4 guifg=white guibg=blue
syn match dollars /\(\$\$\|\\\[\|\\\]\)/
It always worked nicely, but since I upgraded to FC5,
and then from vim6.3 to vim6.4, the highlighting only
works BEFORE the '\begin{document}', and not after
(not very useful...). This persist even if I remove
my .vimrc, or my .vim directory, so it is some new
problem with version 6.4.
Any idea about what is happening??
As Benji F said, you'll need to get it contained (at least in
texDocZone). containedin=ALL
should work, but it will of course then be contained in all groups,
including comments.
The texDocZone group was set up to facilitate syntax-based folding.
Regards,
Chip Campbell
Re: weird LaTeX highlighting in updated vim6.4
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:06:12PM -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've always had some special highlighting for TeX
> files. For example, I have the following syn for "$$":
>
> hi dollars cterm=bold ctermfg=7 ctermbg=4 guifg=white guibg=blue
> syn match dollars /\(\$\$\|\\\[\|\\\]\)/
>
> It always worked nicely, but since I upgraded to FC5,
> and then from vim6.3 to vim6.4, the highlighting only
> works BEFORE the '\begin{document}', and not after
> (not very useful...). This persist even if I remove
> my .vimrc, or my .vim directory, so it is some new
> problem with version 6.4.
>
> Any idea about what is happening??
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Luis.
Probably your $$ occurs inside some syntax region, so it is not
recognized. A simple fix might be to add "containedin=ALL" to the "syn
match" line.
:help containedin
> PS:
> BTW, we are receiving a several spam and virus from vim mailing list.
> Not that matters a lot to me, with Linux, SpamAssassin and Clamav,
> but for windows users... The strange thing is that I needed to change
> my "From " first header through sendmail to be able to post in Vim
> mailing list: the most strict list I belong, and the only one with SPAM.
> Perhaps some tunning needed?
>
> Thanks again. L.
Since there was a big problem with the mail servers a few weeks
ago, I think the plan is to move the lists to a new server ASAP after
vim 7.0 is released. I expect some tuning (tunning?) to take place
then.
HTH --Benji Fisher
