Re: Mechanics of magnetism

2005-02-02 Thread Merlyn
Thanks Horace, I'll certainly look into thatHorace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote: "Jefimenko also produces the complete quantitative results you arelooking for."That should have read, "Jefimenko also produces complete quantitativeresults, but as with the relativistic results of Purcell, Shadowitz, andothers, they deny the effect you hope to see, namely an increase inmagnetic field with an increase in drift speed."One EM effect of possible interest that does increase with drift speed,i.e. reduced charge carrier density, is the Hall voltage.Regards,Horace Heffner MerlynMagickal Engineer and Technical Metaphysicist
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

Re: understanding Laser Propulsion

2005-02-02 Thread Merlyn
I think the discussion between Horace and I on the mechanics behind magnetism has an application here. As Horace pointed out to me, Jefimenko has shown how the magnetic field of a moving charge is due to the retardation of the electric field do to signal speed (electrical dopplering). This would imply that there is no way to manifest a magnetic monopole because a stationary magnetic field does not exist.

As for time reversal, the time-reversed component is the same as the time-forward component.Observing a time-reversed photon is simply looking at the time forward photon in reverse (likerunning a video backwards). You are not following a photon traveling backwards in time, you arebacktracking the photon that has already passed.thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read the book Laser Propulsion,LP, by Unitel-areospace. While I read the words, much of what the author says makes no sense to me. So I've decided to go through it one page at a time and see what comments I get.I've heard about magnetic monopoles for some time. They make a great theory, but I've yet to understand to get one to manifest itself The book says that a proton sets up an electric field when it is motionless, does that ever occur? and that when it is in motion it sets up a magnetic field in three dimensions. A monopole, OTOH, creates a magnetic field when stationary and an electric field when in motion.Then there is the matter of time reversal. The drawing show two loops of wire above one another. A + charged particle is shown moving in between them. When moving between the two loops, the path of the p!
 article
 is reversed with the reversal of the current direction. The second drawing shows four monopoles above and below. When the + charged particle moves through them it's path is a mirror image.If I could move waves or particles in reverse time, then I could transmit information. Tomorrow's winning lottery numbers for instance.In a telephone conversation with the author, he said that photons have two components, one time forward, the other time reversed. I suppose the problem is separating them.MerlynMagickal Engineer and Technical Metaphysicist
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

2 Press Releases Posted from Mallove Family

2005-02-02 Thread Steven Krivit
www.eugenemallove.org


WAY OFF TOPIC - Doll held hostage

2005-02-02 Thread Jed Rothwell


I love it! See:
So-called U.S. hostage appears to be toy

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/02/01/iraq.hostage/index.html

- Jed




Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - Doll held hostage

2005-02-02 Thread leaking pen
seriously, i was calling cnn for a bloody hour trying to tell someone.
 im on totalfark.com, and we had someone find the doll about 6 minutes
after ap broke the story.  we were laughing our guts out as all the
news sources started carrying it, and then the freepers started
talking about glass parking lots, and the demunderground people
started talking about this is what we get for abughraib, and it was
all over a DOLL.  that was a gutbuster.


On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:12:48 -0500, Jed Rothwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I love it! See:
 
 So-called U.S. hostage appears to be toy
 
 http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/02/01/iraq.hostage/index.html 
 
 - Jed
 


-- 
Fairy tales are more than true: not because 
they tell us that dragons exist, but because 
they tell us that dragons can be beaten. 
-G.K. Chesterton