Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis

2012-06-19 Thread Eric Walker
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:

Perhaps they're using quantum cryptography with an enormously large key
 strength.  With sufficiently advanced encryption, we could mistake the
 signal for white noise.


Just to elaborate -- you would need to do more than simply encrypt the
contents of the signal to achieve some kind of cloaking, since the way we
transmit radio these days lends itself to detection in various ways, even
if the contents cannot be decrypted.  You could look for sharp peaks of
intensity across the radio spectrum, for example, and figure out that there
are other people using radios.  In order to have cloaking, you would need
to get rid of all obvious trace of a signal, perhaps along these lines:

   - Take a large sample of the background noise across the full range of
   the human-safe EMF spectrum detected in the vicinity of the antenna.
   - Encrypt your message with very strong encryption.
   - Using the background as the carrier signal, introduce small bits of
   your message here and there, amplifying and attenuating the background just
   a tiny bit across the full range of frequencies.
   - Use incredibly massive redundancy to ensure that the encrypted signal
   survives errors in transmission so that it can be successfully decrypted.

Eric


RE: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis

2012-06-19 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
Eric wrote:

“With sufficiently advanced encryption, we could mistake the signal for white 
noise.”

 

Sounds way too close to A.C.C’s third law which states:

  “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke's_three_laws

 

-mark

 

 

From: Eric Walker [mailto:eric.wal...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 11:05 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis

 

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:

 

Perhaps they're using quantum cryptography with an enormously large key 
strength.  With sufficiently advanced encryption, we could mistake the signal 
for white noise.

 

Just to elaborate -- you would need to do more than simply encrypt the contents 
of the signal to achieve some kind of cloaking, since the way we transmit radio 
these days lends itself to detection in various ways, even if the contents 
cannot be decrypted.  You could look for sharp peaks of intensity across the 
radio spectrum, for example, and figure out that there are other people using 
radios.  In order to have cloaking, you would need to get rid of all obvious 
trace of a signal, perhaps along these lines:

*   Take a large sample of the background noise across the full range of 
the human-safe EMF spectrum detected in the vicinity of the antenna.
*   Encrypt your message with very strong encryption.
*   Using the background as the carrier signal, introduce small bits of 
your message here and there, amplifying and attenuating the background just a 
tiny bit across the full range of frequencies.
*   Use incredibly massive redundancy to ensure that the encrypted signal 
survives errors in transmission so that it can be successfully decrypted.

Eric

 



[Vo]:Moving Beyond the Standard Model

2012-06-19 Thread Robert Leguillon

Recently-analyzed data from BaBar, a high-energy physics experiment based at 
the US Department of Energy's SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, show that a 
particular type of particle decay called 'B to D-star-tau-nu' happens more 
often than the Standard Model says it should
 
http://www.tgdaily.com/general-sciences-features/64132-experiment-raises-doubt-over-standard-model-of-physics
 
The results could be confirmed by the Belle collaboration, which studies 
similar particle collisions. 
If they do, the combined significance could be compelling enough to suggest 
how we can finally move beyond the Standard Model...   
 

Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis

2012-06-19 Thread Terry Blanton
These theories are all well and good; but, there are much greater
possibilities regarding the evolution of sentience.  If you are
unfamiliar with Childhood's End, I would highly recommend a reading.

There are many who believe the hive mind is more of the rule than the
exception.  It certainly appears to be the case in nature.  The flight
of birds such as in the beginning of Take Shelter or this vid:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XH-groCeKbE

implies an innate extrasensory form of communication.  In Childhood's
End, it takes the tranquility created by the Overlords for the mankind
hatchling; but, in other scifi, the mind merge is created by such as
the internet.  One could certainly expect that when our wet ware links
are installed as predicted by Gibson in Neuromancer.

Indeed, Whitley Streiber (et. al. - no pun intended) has conjectured
that the hive-minded little abductors who walk in lockstep while
probing his nether regions are actually time travelling humans who
have returned to the past in hopes of retrieving those genes which
allowed individual thought.

Maybe we are the exception using EM waves to communicate.  Maybe most
nascent sentience uses quantum entanglement for communication.

Indeed we are living in a fairly old universe.  Maybe we are just pets
or a zoo for more mature species.

It goes on.  I won't.

T



RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Missing Neutrons (hydrinos)

2012-06-19 Thread Roarty, Francis X
WELL SAID!!

From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:28 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Missing Neutrons (hydrinos)

One more post on this intriguing subject of “disappearing hydrinos” leading to 
anomalous cooling, before passing the pliers to Terry.

We have already mentioned that Dirac’s “reciprocal space” provides an 
alternative venue for this modality, if it really exists – with a lot more 
credibility and less baggage that “parallel universes” … but that also brings 
up other fractal spatial possibilities.

There is a paper on ArXiv – “Huge Casimir effect at finite temperature in 
electromagnetic Rindler space”. Here is the story on a blog:
http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/10/proposed-metamaterial-structure-to-test.html
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1110/1110.1919v1.pdf

Anyway – there are several novel connection between fractals, anomalous energy 
gain or loss - and active geometry which is not exactly 3-space, all of which 
keep popping up in the literature from time to time (not unlike quantum foam). 
The message is that particular geometry can somehow alter spacetime - and it is 
more than the actual spatial dimensions in nm, but also the layout and the 
(magnetic) field.

These have a common thread in that there is a known dynamic Casimir effect 
(DCE) which can supply excess energy, due to spatial constraints and relativity 
(i.e. altered spacetime). Consider also: ‘Minkowski Space’ is related to 
‘Rindler Space’ and also to ‘De Sitter Space.’ It is possible that all three of 
these terms relate to a unique fractal of space-time (using ‘fractal’ in the 
original sense of a fractional dimension) which becomes accessible at the 
Forster radius of 2-12 nm.

This is NOT normal 3-space, nor is it 2-space but somewhere in between. Almost 
a wormhole, so to speak. Look at the image here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_spacetime

in the context of this article

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1110/1110.1919v1.pdf

This all fits together in a way that is not easy to verbalize, but seems to 
involve
1)Double vortex in spacetime
2)Vortex flipping and self-oscillation
3)Spatial geometry that relates to the Forster radius (FRET) 2-12 nm
4)Exaggerated vibrational modes
5)Anomaly is not always a gain in temperature – sometimes a loss.

The problem is that this analysis is an early attempt to merge 
mathematical-space with real space.

But what is “real space”, anyway?

Jones


-

http://www.springerlink.com/content/h68g501352t57011/fulltext.pdf

Same story on missing neutrons with graph and the full text site - showing the 
apparent region of interest with a cluster at about .1 Gauss. Of course, 
extending this finding (which could be wrong to begin with) to virtual neutrons 
is a leap. Yet that is what we do here- try to extend the ‘cutting edge’ … 
while avoiding the ‘bleeding edge’… This time there the reference paper is 
extremely suspect, in itself.

Anyway, that small triangle in the graph could be important in the context of 
“nano-magnetism” and the fact that the trigger temperature for Ni-H seems to 
relate to the Curie temperature of nickel. It also tends to show visually how 
difficult hitting the parameter for disappearance would be. The magnetic field 
in question is actually LESS than the Earth's magnetic field at its surface 
which is about .4 Gauss in most places. A typical refrigerator magnet is 50 
Gauss so we have to ask – are they really that accurate with this?

We can imagine that the ‘sweet spot’ – which relates to cryogenic neutrons 
would be much harder to duplicate at 350C. Anyway, on the plus side - I could 
download the paper today from Springer for free, which is unusual since they 
(especially) usually charge a significant fee for carrying out the garbage.

Jones

… perhaps ALL reactions with hydrogen loaded metal result in a mix of the two 
temperature anomalies, hot and cold - even the ones that are massively gainful 
in heat… Those with heat, such as Rossi claims, could be at a ratio of 90/10 
(hot/cold). Perhaps Ahern titanium samples gave 47/53 and it appeared to be 
cooling, but it was only net cooling with significant heat also….If the 
“missing neutron” or “missing hydrino” ends up providing a huge loss of 
mass-energy to the reaction, then that loss covers up a lot of excess heat 
prior to the disappearance.

This can possibly explain why LERN is generally unreliable – a natural tendency 
to produce a balance of excess heat and excess cooling - and it requires some 
unknown intervention to shift the balance. The intervention appears to be a 
magnetic field at only about a tenth of a gauss.



Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis

2012-06-19 Thread Michele Comitini
2012/6/19 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com:

 Maybe we are the exception using EM waves to communicate.  Maybe most
 nascent sentience uses quantum entanglement for communication.



I agree.  We are using EM to communicate since 200yrs only considering
the telegraph.  Could be that in 100 years EM will be obsoleted by new
means of communication.  Compared to Universe age 500 yrs are nothing
so our own EM emission could remain undetected forever by any other
form of life even on Earth.

mic




Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s carbon nanotubes

2012-06-19 Thread David Roberson

There are a several excellent reasons for a flat design.  It can be up scaled 
easily by laying parallel units side by side to obtain larger power levels.  
Also, heat can be more easily extracted from a larger surface area such as a 
rectangle when compared to a cylinder.  We do not know exactly how Rossi is 
reinforcing the flat structures for pressure as he may be doing it with the 
outer shell.  And, I would think it is far easier to build a flat planar 
structure into a package especially when more than one is used.

I suspect that the cost of the heavier material required to offset the strength 
lost due to flat versus cylinder shape is not important.  At the size of his 
devices this material difference will be far out weighted by the energy savings.

Do consider that all of the examples that you pointed out are usually seen in a 
stand alone environment where there is no need for an outer supporting 
structure which can easily compensate.

Dave 



-Original Message-
From: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jun 19, 2012 1:41 am
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s carbon nanotubes


Axil, IMHO, the following is my analysis:

snip
 
1.  I think we can be certain that the major redesign had something to do with 
being able to deliver sparks more efficiently.  A pressure vessel made of 2 
parallel plates makes abosolutely no sense for a pressure vessel from a 
mechanical or structural point of view.  A vessel that is wide and broad and 
thin makes a poor pressure vessel because it is more difficult to prevent leaks 
and to fortify it properly for pressure operation.  Hence the resulting vessel 
would have to be sturdier than necessary making it more expensive.  Hence, 
makes no sense from a structural point of view.  There's a reason why almost 
pressure vessels we use in the industry are cylindrical in shape, ie. propane 
tanks, gas tanks, oxygen tanks, and all sorts of pressure tanks.  Roosi's 
redesign to a FatCat was prompted by something else.  To me, it was the need to 
deliver sparks.  I can't think of anything else.
 
snip





Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis

2012-06-19 Thread David Roberson

A thought just occurred to me.  Maybe the fact that we have not discovered 
radio signals from any of these aliens is a strong suggestion that there is an 
alternate superior method of communication that we will discover within the 
next few years, assuming that we progress as others have.  This is all the more 
reason for us to adequately fund new unknown energy sources.

Dave



-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jun 19, 2012 2:05 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis


On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:



Perhaps they're using quantum cryptography with an enormously large key 
strength.  With sufficiently advanced encryption, we could mistake the signal 
for white noise.




Just to elaborate -- you would need to do more than simply encrypt the contents 
of the signal to achieve some kind of cloaking, since the way we transmit radio 
these days lends itself to detection in various ways, even if the contents 
cannot be decrypted.  You could look for sharp peaks of intensity across the 
radio spectrum, for example, and figure out that there are other people using 
radios.  In order to have cloaking, you would need to get rid of all obvious 
trace of a signal, perhaps along these lines:

Take a large sample of the background noise across the full range of the 
human-safe EMF spectrum detected in the vicinity of the antenna.
Encrypt your message with very strong encryption.
Using the background as the carrier signal, introduce small bits of your 
message here and there, amplifying and attenuating the background just a tiny 
bit across the full range of frequencies.
Use incredibly massive redundancy to ensure that the encrypted signal survives 
errors in transmission so that it can be successfully decrypted.

Eric





Re: [Vo]:Moving Beyond the Standard Model

2012-06-19 Thread David Roberson

I suspect that the current 'Standard Model' is not the final model that will 
ever exist.  As new discoveries are made the models will need to be upgraded 
and if history is an indication of what will happen in the future, the present 
models will be 'thrown into the dust heap of history' as it has been eloquently 
said.

No disrespect intended.

Dave



-Original Message-
From: Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com
To: Vortex Listserve vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jun 19, 2012 9:00 am
Subject: [Vo]:Moving Beyond the Standard Model


Recently-analyzed data from BaBar, a high-energy physics experiment based at 
the US Department of Energy's SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, show that a 
particular type of particle decay called 'B to D-star-tau-nu' happens more 
often than the Standard Model says it should
 
http://www.tgdaily.com/general-sciences-features/64132-experiment-raises-doubt-over-standard-model-of-physics
 
The results could be confirmed by the Belle collaboration, which studies 
similar particle collisions. 
If they do, the combined significance could be compelling enough to suggest 
how we can finally move beyond the Standard Model...




Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis

2012-06-19 Thread David Roberson

It sounds like you should author a new book titled 'The Matrix'(joking of 
course).  I hope that we are of free will and have at least a small say as to 
how our lives are to proceed.

Dave



-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jun 19, 2012 9:43 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis


These theories are all well and good; but, there are much greater
ossibilities regarding the evolution of sentience.  If you are
nfamiliar with Childhood's End, I would highly recommend a reading.
There are many who believe the hive mind is more of the rule than the
xception.  It certainly appears to be the case in nature.  The flight
f birds such as in the beginning of Take Shelter or this vid:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XH-groCeKbE
implies an innate extrasensory form of communication.  In Childhood's
nd, it takes the tranquility created by the Overlords for the mankind
atchling; but, in other scifi, the mind merge is created by such as
he internet.  One could certainly expect that when our wet ware links
re installed as predicted by Gibson in Neuromancer.
Indeed, Whitley Streiber (et. al. - no pun intended) has conjectured
hat the hive-minded little abductors who walk in lockstep while
robing his nether regions are actually time travelling humans who
ave returned to the past in hopes of retrieving those genes which
llowed individual thought.
Maybe we are the exception using EM waves to communicate.  Maybe most
ascent sentience uses quantum entanglement for communication.
Indeed we are living in a fairly old universe.  Maybe we are just pets
r a zoo for more mature species.
It goes on.  I won't.
T



Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis

2012-06-19 Thread Harry Veeder
Even if you are caged like zoo animal, or work in labour camp or
struggle to make ends meet, everyday you will have the free will
to acquiesce.

Harry



On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:22 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
 It sounds like you should author a new book titled 'The Matrix'(joking of
 course).  I hope that we are of free will and have at least a small say as
 to how our lives are to proceed.

 Dave


 -Original Message-
 From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
 To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Sent: Tue, Jun 19, 2012 9:43 am
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis

 These theories are all well and good; but, there are much greater
 possibilities regarding the evolution of sentience.  If you are
 unfamiliar with Childhood's End, I would highly recommend a reading.

 There are many who believe the hive mind is more of the rule than the
 exception.  It certainly appears to be the case in nature.  The flight
 of birds such as in the beginning of Take Shelter or this vid:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XH-groCeKbE

 implies an innate extrasensory form of communication.  In Childhood's
 End, it takes the tranquility created by the Overlords for the mankind
 hatchling; but, in other scifi, the mind merge is created by such as
 the internet.  One could certainly expect that when our wet ware links
 are installed as predicted by Gibson in Neuromancer.

 Indeed, Whitley Streiber (et. al. - no pun intended) has conjectured
 that the hive-minded little abductors who walk in lockstep while
 probing his nether regions are actually time travelling humans who
 have returned to the past in hopes of retrieving those genes which
 allowed individual thought.

 Maybe we are the exception using EM waves to communicate.  Maybe most
 nascent sentience uses quantum entanglement for communication.

 Indeed we are living in a fairly old universe.  Maybe we are just pets
 or a zoo for more mature species.

 It goes on.  I won't.

 T




[Vo]:free full 32 pages, Very high-temperature impact melt products as evidence for cosmic airbursts and impacts 12,900 years ago, TE Bunch et al, PNAS: Rich Murray 2012.06.19

2012-06-19 Thread Rich Murray
free full 32 pages, Very high-temperature impact melt products as
evidence for cosmic airbursts and impacts 12,900 years ago, TE Bunch
et al, PNAS: Rich Murray 2012.06.19
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2012/06/free-full-32-pages-very-high.html


www.cosmictusk.com  via Scribd (can expand pages)

www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1204453109
10 page pdf  [ once saved, the pdf can be copied ]

This article contains supporting information online at
www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1204453109/-/DCSupplemental.
22 page pdf

Very high-temperature impact melt products as evidence for cosmic
airbursts and impacts 12,900 years ago

Ted E. Bunch a,1,
Robert E. Hermes b,
Andrew M.T. Moore c,
Douglas J. Kennett d,
James C. Weaver e,
James H. Wittke a,
Paul S. DeCarli f,
James L. Bischoff g,
Gordon C. Hillman h,
George A. Howard i,
David R. Kimbel j,
Gunther Kletetschka k,l,
Carl P. Lipo m,
Sachiko Sakai m,
Zsolt Revay n,
Allen West o,
Richard B. Firestone p,
and James P. Kennett q.

a Geology Program, School of Earth Science and Environmental Sustainability,
Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011;

b Los Alamos National Laboratory (retired),
Los Alamos, NM 87545;

c College of Liberal Arts, Rochester Institute of Technology,
Rochester, NY 14623;

d Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802;

e Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;

f SRI International, Menlo Park, CA 94025;

g US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA 94025;

h Institute of Archaeology, University College London,
London, United Kingdom;

i Restoration Systems, LLC, Raleigh, NC 27604;

j Kimstar Research, Fayetteville, NC 28312;

k Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, and

l Institute of Geology,
Czech Academy of Science of the Czech Republic,
v.v.i., Prague, Czech Republic;

m Institute for Integrated Research in Materials, Environments, and
Society (IIRMES),
California State University, Long Beach, CA 90840;

 nForschungsneutronenquelle
Heinz Maier-Leibnitz (FRM II),
Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany;

o GeoScience Consulting, Dewey, AZ 86327;

p Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
Berkeley, CA 94720; and

q Department of Earth Science and Marine Science Instititute,
University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106

Edited by* Steven M. Stanley, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI,
and approved April 30, 2012
(received for review March 19, 2012)


Figure S6. [ 8 color photos of 0.2 mm spherules, page 16/32 = 6/22 ]
Light photomicrographs of magnetic and glassy spherules from Melrose, PA.
Shapes include spherules, ovals, teardrops, and dumbbells.
Colors include clear, gray, red, brown, and black.
Note spherule B contains a large bubble.
Both dumbbells (D and H) indicate fusion of molten or semi-plastic spherules.
Note that dumbbell H consists of two dissimilar accretionary spherules,
one clear (Si-rich) and the other opaque (Fe-rich).


photo of typical air burst geoablation glaze on hard bedrock at top of
Mount Helix park, E San Diego: Rich Murray 2012.03.15
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2012/03/redbrown-glaze-on-hard-crystalline.html
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2012/03/photo-of-typical-air-burst-geoablation.html
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/98

Rich Murray,
MA Boston University Graduate School 1967 psychology,
BS MIT 1964 history and physics,
254-A Donax Avenue, Imperial Beach, CA 91932-1918
rmfor...@gmail.com
505-819-7388 cell
619-623-3468 home
rich.murray11 Skype audio, video
http://RMForAll.blogspot.com
rmforallblog.wordpress.com



Re: [Vo]:Sagnac effect, optical gyroscope lock-in

2012-06-19 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:08 AM, David Jonsson
davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 Can someone refer me to the lock-in effect in optical gyroscopes? I have
 also heard the effect being mentioned as a phase lock loop effect.

 Could lock-in effect also be present in a straight interferometer like a
 Michelson-Morley-interferometer?

Principle of operation

A certain rate of rotation induces a small difference between the time
it takes light to traverse the ring in the two directions according to
the Sagnac effect. This introduces a tiny separation between the
frequencies of the counter-propagating beams, a motion of the standing
wave pattern within the ring, and thus a beat pattern when those two
beams are interfered outside the ring. Therefore the net shift of that
interference pattern follows the rotation of the unit in the plane of
the ring.

RLGs, while more accurate than mechanical gyroscopes, suffer from an
effect known as lock-in at very slow rotation rates. When the ring
laser is hardly rotating, the frequencies of the counter-propagating
laser modes become almost identical. In this case crosstalk in between
the counter-propagating beams can allow for injection locking so that
the standing wave gets stuck in a preferred phase, thus locking the
frequency of each beam to each other rather than responding to gradual
rotation.

Forced dithering can largely overcome this problem. The ring laser
cavity is rotated clockwise and anti-clockwise about its axis using a
mechanical spring driven at its resonance frequency. This ensures that
the angular velocity of the system is usually far from the lock-in
threshold. Typical rates are 400 Hz, with a peak dither velocity of 1
arc-second per second. Dither does not fix the lock-in problem
completely, as each time the direction of rotation is reversed, a
short time interval exists in which the rotation rate is near zero and
lock-in can briefly occur. In a technically more complicated solution
the gyro assembly is not rotated back and forth, but in one direction
only at a constant angular rate.

A related device is the fibre optic gyroscope which also operates on
the basis of the Sagnac effect, but in which the ring is not a part of
the laser. Rather, an external laser injects counter-propagating beams
into an optical fiber ring, and rotation of the system then causes a
relative phase shift between those beams when interfered after their
pass through the fiber ring proportional to the rate of rotation. This
is therefore less sensitive than the RLG in which the externally
observed phase shift is proportional to the accumulated rotation
itself, not its derivative. However the sensitivity of the fiber gyro
is enhanced by having a long optical fiber coiled for compactness, but
in which the Sagnac effect is multiplied according to the number of
turns.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_laser_gyroscope

end

I don't think it relates to the MM experiment.

T



Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis

2012-06-19 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Perhaps we, or more specifically, our gene pool, is considered
something akin to a game preserve by many species out yonder. Future
selves (containers?) occasionally coming back to sample the
indigenous DNA of their ancient ancestors. Such a hypothesis would
certainly make more sense as compared to ET's that evolved completely
independently from us trying to splice our genes into theirs.
Personally, I suspect there has been contamination going on for
millions of years. In the final analysis, we are all bastards, and
we're probably related to everyone. Welcome to the family!
Unfortunately, that includes the In Laws too. ;-)

Regarding ACC's CE, (Indeed, a great novel).  This, of course, goes to
the heart of what comprises a unique identity - a soul if you will. I
suspect older souls like ACC and Carl Jung inevitably become more
attuned to the illusion of the self and all the baggage associated
with it. Perhaps at first such revelations disturb them. They end up
writing novels and turgid scientific journals on the matter as a way
to confront their internal struggles. Later, I think most simply
accept the inevitability of it all. Life  Consciousness... Even if it
does transform to something else that is currently perceived as
unknown, it still goes on. We go on.

Do individual identities exist, or are identities nothing more than
an evolutionary construct that seems to have certain advantages over
the more instinctual hive minded approach. From an evolutionary POV,
it would seem that both approaches of awareness have their advantages
and disadvantages.

Do I exist? (Personally: I think not... therefore I am not!) I
am not I. Perhaps I/we-all are observers who are playing with an
infinite number of I's on the planar field of the Universe.

I think a number of eastern approaches have got a much better handle
on such vexing matters. Western philosophies and our quaint relig'ns
are only now beginning to grasp the ramifications of what certain
eastern POVs managed to grok thousands of years ago.

My, oh my! Such a recent spat of OT discussions! ... about the nature
of consciousness. Makes my wet ware quiver! ;-)

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis

2012-06-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:


 Eric wrote:

 “With sufficiently advanced encryption, we could mistake the signal for
 white noise.”

 ** **

 Sounds way too close to A.C.C’s third law which states:

   “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”


I discussed this very issue with Clarke. I said that data compression is
likely to make utilitarian interstellar communication invisible. He agreed.
He had a lot professional knowledge of data, communication, radio, radar
and so on, from WWII. (A lot more than me.)

That is to say, an advanced civilization communicating with a colony on
another star is likely to use a narrow beam that will not be intercepted in
the first place, and it is likely to compress the data even more than we
compress multichannel television broadcasts from satellites. It would end
up looking like a white light; just noise.

Years ago it was thought that TV and radio signals from the Earth would
reach distant stars. That was one of the themes of the movie Contact
(1997). Lately I have read that signals from Earth probably fade out
completely at less than 1 light year, and cannot be read even in principle.
I suppose that means planetary, satellite, and interplanetary communication
on other stars cannot be read by us. I expect the only signals we could
read with confidence would be ones that are intended to be read by any
civilization with radio; i.e. the signal in Contact.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis

2012-06-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:


 There are many who believe the hive mind is more of the rule than the
 exception.  It certainly appears to be the case in nature.  The flight
 of birds such as in the beginning of Take Shelter or this vid:


My guess is that there is some prosaic method of communication between the
birds, if anything in biology can be described as prosaic. I say that
because there have been countless other astounding abilities discovered in
biology yet in every case I know of so far, when they were explained, the
explanation did not involve anything beyond the known set of senses such as
vision, hearing, sense of touch or magnetism (used by migrating birds). The
classic example is a bat's ability to navigate in semi-darkness from
hearing (echolocation). It is astounding, but it ain't ESP. Before they
discovered bat echolocation in 1938 it seemed like ESP.

Even if the means of communication are prosaic and  similar to our own
senses, I think it is perfectly reasonable to say that a flock of birds
does have a hive mind. A hive of bees definitely does. A hive of bees is
capable of advanced, organized behavior such as scouting and bringing back
food, and building complex wax honeycomb shapes. A single bee could never
do this. I doubt it would even have enough brain cells to store the
information. Insects communicate by ordinary means such as movement and
pheromones that have been partially decoded by people.

- Jed


[Vo]:OT:The aging brain: Why getting older just might be awesome

2012-06-19 Thread Harry Veeder
The prevailing wisdom is that creative endeavors are good for helping
to slow the decline of our mental capabilities. But what if, in fact,
the aging brain is more capable than its younger counterpart at
creativity and innovation?

It's a compelling proposition in our society, where more and more
seniors are looking for jobs and going back to work (the number of
working seniors has more than doubled since 1990, according to the
Bureau of Labor Statistics); where ageism is rampant in many areas
(particularly hiring); and where innovation is, for the most part,
considered a young person's domain.


http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/19/health/enayati-aging-brain-innovation/index.html

Harry



Re: [Vo]:OT:The aging brain: Why getting older just might be awesome

2012-06-19 Thread Peter Gluck
Dear Harry,
if you have a special interest in this organ, you can find
many papers about BRAIN in the newsletter INFORMAVORE's SUNDAY (no 438 to
500) at SCIENCE and in the newer QUI CITO (no1 to 30) at my blog EGO OUT.
You also can learn about Bisinisencephalians but it is dangerous, better to
avoid it.
Peter


On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:

 The prevailing wisdom is that creative endeavors are good for helping
 to slow the decline of our mental capabilities. But what if, in fact,
 the aging brain is more capable than its younger counterpart at
 creativity and innovation?

 It's a compelling proposition in our society, where more and more
 seniors are looking for jobs and going back to work (the number of
 working seniors has more than doubled since 1990, according to the
 Bureau of Labor Statistics); where ageism is rampant in many areas
 (particularly hiring); and where innovation is, for the most part,
 considered a young person's domain.



 http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/19/health/enayati-aging-brain-innovation/index.html

 Harry




-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


[Vo]:Test

2012-06-19 Thread Nanook

Testing list processing.

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
 Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting.
   Knowledgable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers.
 See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.



Re: [Vo]:Test

2012-06-19 Thread Terry Blanton
Watch out where the huskies go and don't you eat that yellow snow!

T

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Nanook nan...@eskimo.com wrote:

 Testing list processing.

 -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
  Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting.
   Knowledgable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers.
  See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.




[Vo]:e-cat world quoted my post here

2012-06-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
I posted an astringent response to some of the comments. The skeptics said
what they always say, and I said what I always say. Which is: read the
literature before you comment on this subject.

It reminds me a little of Duke of Wellington's comment about his own
tried-and-true tactics against the French army:

They came on in the same old way and we defeated them in the same old way.

See:

http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/06/how-big-of-a-story-is-cold-fusion/

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis

2012-06-19 Thread Eric Walker
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:05 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.netwrote:


 **

 Sounds way too close to A.C.C’s third law which states:

   “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”


Sounds right.  I'm sure I subconsciously picked up on that concept but
didn't realize it.

Eric


RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:FYI: ZPF-inertia work applied to subatomic particles; spatial harmonic resonances

2012-06-19 Thread hellokevin



Do electons have mass or do they not?    
 
 
 Numerical simulations of this effect demonstrate the manner in which a 
MASSless fundamental particle, e.g. an electron, acquires inertial properties; 
this also shows the apparent origin of particle spin along lines originally 
proposed by Schrodinger.  Finally, we suggest that the heavier leptons (muon 
and tau) may be explainable as spatial-harmonic resonances of the (fundamental) 
electron.  They would carry the same overall charge, but with the charge now 
having spatially lobed structure, each lobe of which would respond to higher 
frequency components of the electromagnetic quantum vacuum,
 
 
 thereby increasing the inertia and thus manifesting a heavier MASS. 
 
 
***A MASSless particle won't manifest a heavier MASS.  Either way, the theory 
postulates that electrons would acquire intertia.  That means the electrons are 
manipulable, and if they have inertia, they can be pushed away from Protons in 
the Hydrogen nuclei and thus the Coulomb barrier is easier to overcome.    I 
postulate this in the thread where I suggest the Poynting Asymmetrical 
Capacitor Thrust vector is discussed
 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg66755.html

Re: [Vo]:Transcension Hypothesis

2012-06-19 Thread Eric Walker
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:10 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:

 A thought just occurred to me.  Maybe the fact that we have not discovered
 radio signals from any of these aliens is a strong suggestion that there is
 an alternate superior method of communication that we will discover within
 the next few years, assuming that we progress as others have.  This is all
 the more reason for us to adequately fund new unknown energy sources.

 Dave


I like that thought.

To further flesh out the idea about the novel form of EM radiation
communication, imagine a GIF image of the Mona Lisa.  It looks just like
any other such image, but some of the pixels have a slightly different
color.  The modification is subtle enough that the human eye won't be able
to see the difference.  And if the encoding is done very cleverly, even
very good computer algorithms won't be able to pick it out.  But if you
have the public key, you can run the image through decompression software
and get a message out. The encoding scheme could involve the colors in the
image as they relate to other colors, for example.

Now imagine doing this with radio communication across a spectrum.  The
image in this case is whatever is passing through the transceiver at that
moment.  Since we're using a lot of redundancy in the encoding of the
information, we can afford to make the modifications to the incoming signal
very slight.  You might be able to get away with such a scheme with every
little power consumed in relaying the modified signal -- I'm just guessing
here, but perhaps it could be more energy efficient to transmit information
this way.  And there could be different channels -- low frequencies
together with their harmonics, which you could use for things like error
correction.  This seems like something that might already be possible.  I
wonder if militaries already have something like it.

The quantum entanglement idea is an interesting one.

Eric


RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:FYI: ZPF-inertia work applied to subatomic particles; spatial harmonic resonances

2012-06-19 Thread Nanook

 They do, about 1/2000th that of a proton.

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
 Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting.
   Knowledgable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers.
 See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.

On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 helloke...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
 From: helloke...@sbcglobal.net
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:FYI: ZPF-inertia work applied to subatomic
particles; spatial harmonic resonances
 Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:41:26 -0700
 Resent-From: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 
 
 
 
 Do electons have mass or do they not?    
  
  
  Numerical simulations of this effect demonstrate the manner in which a 
 MASSless fundamental particle, e.g. an electron, acquires inertial 
 properties; this also shows the apparent origin of particle spin along lines 
 originally proposed by Schrodinger.  Finally, we suggest that the heavier 
 leptons (muon and tau) may be explainable as spatial-harmonic resonances of 
 the (fundamental) electron.  They would carry the same overall charge, but 
 with the charge now having spatially lobed structure, each lobe of which 
 would respond to higher frequency components of the electromagnetic quantum 
 vacuum,
  
  
  thereby increasing the inertia and thus manifesting a heavier MASS. 
  
  
 ***A MASSless particle won't manifest a heavier MASS.  Either way, the theory 
 postulates that electrons would acquire intertia.  That means the electrons 
 are manipulable, and if they have inertia, they can be pushed away from 
 Protons in the Hydrogen nuclei and thus the Coulomb barrier is easier to 
 overcome.    I postulate this in the thread where I suggest the Poynting 
 Asymmetrical Capacitor Thrust vector is discussed
  
   http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg66755.html