[Vo]:Fw: [teslafy] 5 years ago

[Harvey Norris]

 Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances 
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/

 On Friday, September 1, 2017 10:45 PM, "harv...@yahoo.com [teslafy]" 
 wrote:
 

     Facebook posted a memory from 
then...http://beforeitsnews.com/science-and-technology/2012/08/inventor-shows-5-fold-wireless-gain-of-amperage-between-equal-coils-2463024.htmltodays
 comments to facebook;It was a great stumbling block to encounter and 
rationalize situations whereby more power comes out then the amount of power 
being imputed. The answer to this riddle was contained in how the electrical 
science defines things. They declare that the apparent power input will show a 
delusional reading for several reasons; chiefly because the acting voltage and 
the resultant amperages on the reactive circuits are not in phase with each 
other. They then declare that if the reactances in the circuit are cancelled by 
having equally opposing inductive and capacitive reactances in series; then the 
amount of current in the circuit will be dictated by the remaining amount of 
resistance, according to Ohms law predictions. In the working real world of 
real components this ideal behavior is rarely seen. The actual working amperage 
is always less then the textbook definitions because of internal capacity of 
the coil windings being resonated. Thus any phase angle calculations based on 
the voltage and amperage are out to lunch. When we look at the apparent power 
VI input with regard to the true primary power input as I squared R currents on 
that primary; the apparent power is greater then the real power exactly 
according to theory. We have been accustomed to expect that the apparent power 
is greater then the real one. But when that primary is magnetically coupled 
with another secondary in this case more power comes out from the secondary 
then the amount imputed to that primary. But if we ADD the resistive losses of 
both the primary AND secondary we find that now the apparent reactive power of 
the source of voltage equals the true power on both components; EVEN though the 
currents that developed did not come to their ohms law predictions. HDN  
__._,_.___ Posted by: harv...@yahoo.com 
|  Reply via web post  | • |   Reply to sender   | • |   Reply to group   | • | 
 Start a New Topic  | • |  Messages in this topic (1)  |

Have you tried the highest rated email app? With 4.5 stars in iTunes, 
the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you 
waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) 
in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.
   Visit Your Group
• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use 
 .  
 __,_._,___#yiv9252038177 #yiv9252038177 -- #yiv9252038177ygrp-mkp {border:1px 
solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv9252038177 
#yiv9252038177ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv9252038177 
#yiv9252038177ygrp-mkp #yiv9252038177hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv9252038177 #yiv9252038177ygrp-mkp #yiv9252038177ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv9252038177 #yiv9252038177ygrp-mkp .yiv9252038177ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv9252038177 #yiv9252038177ygrp-mkp .yiv9252038177ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv9252038177 #yiv9252038177ygrp-mkp .yiv9252038177ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9252038177 #yiv9252038177ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv9252038177ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv9252038177 
#yiv9252038177ygrp-sponsor #yiv9252038177ygrp-lc #yiv9252038177hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv9252038177 
#yiv9252038177ygrp-sponsor #yiv9252038177ygrp-lc .yiv9252038177ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv9252038177 #yiv9252038177actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv9252038177 
#yiv9252038177activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv9252038177
 #yiv9252038177activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv9252038177 
#yiv9252038177activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv9252038177 #yiv9252038177activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9252038177 #yiv9252038177activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv9252038177 #yiv9252038177activity span 
.yiv9252038177underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv9252038177 
.yiv9252038177attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv9252038177 .yiv9252038177attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9252038177 .yiv9252038177attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv9252038177 .yiv9252038177attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv9252038177 .yiv9252038177attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9252038177 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv9252038177 .yiv9252038177bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv9252038177 
.yiv9252038177bold a 

RE: [Vo]:Rossi's imaginary company folds

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

Jed—

I agree that bias is a point of view, not necessarily based on facts and 
frequently presented with descriptive non-facts, like bad science.

Bob Cook


From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 1:00 PM
To: Vortex
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi's imaginary company folds

bobcook39...@hotmail.com 
> wrote:

I assume your misleading comment about Rossi’s “imaginary company” is like fake 
news: intended to create biased spin.

Not biased from my point of view.


As far as in know (per legal documents from the settled suit between Rossi 
etal. and Darden etal.) the company was a real corporation in Florida.

Of course it was a real corporation! However, it had no employees, it conducted 
no business, made no profits, and paid no taxes. That makes it a dummy or fake 
corporation. Rossi claimed it was doing thousands of dollars a day of business 
selling products that used process heat from the reactor. He tried to pay I.H. 
for the heat. This was revealed in the trial docket.

There was no heat, other than the 20 kW input. The whole thing was a crude 
fake. This is clear from the documents by Penon, Murray and Smith, which are 
also in the docket.

- Jed

[Vo]:A preliminary look at Mizuno's air flow calorimetry spreadsheets

[Jed Rothwell]

I uploaded a preliminary look at Mizuno's spreadsheets. My report includes
graphs, so I cannot upload it in this forum. You can read it here:

https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5340-mizuno-publication-of-kw-cop2-excess-heat-results/?postID=70516#post70516


The text begins --

I received some spreadsheets from Mizuno for the data in this paper:

Mizuno, T., Preprint, *Observation of excess heat by activated metal and
deuterium gas*. J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci., 2017.

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTpreprintob.pdf

The sheets included:

BCD60520.xls, 120 W calibration, date 2016/5/20
BND60519.xls, 120 W excess heat, date 2016/5/19

I uploaded a copy of the latter here:

https://drive.google.com/open?…r0UahtG1ZPAJmAJmejB6EMipY

I have not yet uploaded the first one.

The method of computing excess heat is still a little unclear to me. There
was some confusion about the area of the outlet, which we now believe
should be 0.0044 m^2. This affects the formula for the total weight of air
that moves through the calorimeter per second. It will increase the
estimate of excess heat in the paper. I will soon upload a revised
pre-print reflecting this change. The figures and graphs graphs in this
report are based on the outlet area of 0.0044 m^2.

I thought I would make a simplified, preliminary analysis putting aside
these issues. I do not need to know that absolute level of heat to compare
the calibration to the (apparent) excess heat test. I need only compare
temperatures. I made one assumption: Because the blower power is 4.7 W for
both runs, I assume the air flow rate and calorimetry are the same in both
runs. . . .

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's imaginary company folds

[Jed Rothwell]

bobcook39...@hotmail.com  wrote:


> I assume your misleading comment about Rossi’s “imaginary company” is like
> fake news: intended to create biased spin.
>

Not biased from my point of view.



> As far as in know (per legal documents from the settled suit between Rossi
> etal. and Darden etal.) the company was a real corporation in Florida.
>

Of course it was a real corporation! However, it had no employees, it
conducted no business, made no profits, and paid no taxes. That makes it a
dummy or fake corporation. Rossi claimed it was doing thousands of dollars
a day of business selling products that used process heat from the reactor.
He tried to pay I.H. for the heat. This was revealed in the trial docket.

There was no heat, other than the 20 kW input. The whole thing was a crude
fake. This is clear from the documents by Penon, Murray and Smith, which
are also in the docket.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:Why pairs?

[Axil Axil]

Entanglement is an inevitable feature of reality

In a new study, physicists have mathematically proved that any theory
 that has a classical limit—meaning that it
can describe our observations of the classical world
 by recovering classical theory
under certain conditions—must contain entanglement. So despite the fact
that entanglement goes against classical intuition, entanglement must be an
inevitable feature of not only quantum theory but also any non-classical
theory, even those that are yet to be developed.

Read more at:
https://phys.org/news/2017-09-entanglement-inevitable-feature-reality.html#jCp

Much of the way that LENR works is based on entanglement.


On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:

> Monogamy of entanglement
>
> '''Monogamy ''' is one of the most fundamental properties of entanglement
> and can, in its extremal form, be expressed as follows: *If two qubits A
> and B are maximally quantumly correlated they cannot be correlated at all
> with a third qubit C.* In general, there is a trade-off between the
> amount of entanglement between qubits A and B and the same qubit A and
> qubit C. This is mathematically expressed by the *Coffman-Kundu-Wootters
> (CKW) monogamy inequality*
>
>
> *In other words, to create entanglement during particle creation as a
> unbreakable rule of the way the universe works, two particles are required.*
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>
>> In a universe where all points must be connected, a pair is a topological
>> requirement. In a system where all endpoints must be connected then every
>> connection must have at least two endpoints.
>>
>> At the beginning of the big bang, Computational complexity was at its
>> minimum and quantum entanglement was at its maximum. The entire universe
>> was completely entangled, it was a bose condensate. This was the time when
>> all the forces were combined in a grand unification to operated as a single
>> force. As the universe expanded and cooled, entanglement decreased and
>> Computational complexity increased. The four fundamental forces began to
>> diverge and the running coupling constants of those fundamental forces also
>> began to diverge.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> When spacetime returns to the entangled state that the universe was
>> initially in, the fundamental forces return to the way that they were at
>> the beginning of the big bang and the single global fundamental force is
>> reestablished.
>>
>>
>> In this restored state of spacetime simplicity, the LENR reaction is
>> manifest.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:38 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> That doesn’t answer my question… it’s just regurgitating the
>>> particle/antiparticle jargon.
>>>
>>> -mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:41 AM
>>> *To:* vortex-l
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Why pairs?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The latest theory is that entanglement keeps spacetime together.
>>> Entanglement is fundamental.  All other aspects of spacetime come from
>>> entanglement. In order for entanglement to exist, two things must be
>>> entangled. When a particle is created, it must be paired with an
>>> antiparticle so that a connection between them is formed...entanglement
>>> must be created.  All particle pairs must be connected by a wormhole. The
>>> wormhole is the mechanism that keeps spacetime together.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We can manipulate the forces of nature, weak, strong, EMF, gravity by
>>> using entanglement, since those "fundamental" forces come from(aka emerge)
>>> entanglement and all the properties of spacetime emerge from entanglement.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This idea has just come to Leonard Susskind and is explained here:
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Qubitzers, GR=QM
>>>
>>> Leonard Susskind
>>> 
>>>
>>> *(Submitted on 10 Aug 2017)*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.03040
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Also, here is how wormholes work
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnbJEg9r1o8
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:12 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Vorts,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Perusing some physics news, and thought you’d b interested in this:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/841935/Why-is-there-a-
>>> universe-quarks-quantum-physics-big-bang-nothing-god
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Some excerpts:
>>>
>>> The new findings seem to break the classical physics law of the
>>> Conservation of Energy – that energy can neither be created nor destroyed –
>>> showing that new energy can appear within a closed system from nowhere.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> These Quantum physicists first theorised, then proved, that particles
>>> simply pop into existence, usually in pairs, from absolutely nowhere.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nobel prize winner Frank 

RE: [Vo]:Rossi's imaginary company folds

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

Jed—

I assume your misleading comment about Rossi’s “imaginary company” is like fake 
news: intended to create biased spin.

As far as in know (per legal documents from the settled suit between Rossi 
etal. and Darden etal.) the company was a real corporation in Florida.

Bob Cook




From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 12:43 PM
To: Vortex
Subject: [Vo]:Rossi's imaginary company folds

Rossi's imaginary company, J.M. Products, has folded its imaginary tent and 
vanished in the night:

http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName=Initial=JMCHEMICALPRODUCTS%20P14561170=domp-p1456117-f1b317f1-99eb-48c8-9cce-18b618a70d75=JM%20Chemical%20products=JMCHEMICALPRODUCTS%20P14561170

I have heard that Rossi is planning to go to Sweden to swindle his next group 
of marks.

- Jed