Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-22 Thread Nick Palmer
This must be a scam. As Jed said, at the point where the craft is going 
downwind at the speed of the wind, the relative wind across the propeller 
would be zero so it could not accelerate from this point on. If it did, the 
force from the prop would reverse anyway. Even more obviously, if it can 
accelerate from a position of zero relative wind then one could start it off 
in no wind conditions and it would accelerate - perpetual motion just isn't 
that easy!



Nick Palmer

On the side of the Planet - and the people - because they're worth it

Blogspot - Sustainability and stuff according to Nick Palmer
http://nickpalmer.blogspot.com



Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-22 Thread John Fields
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:01:42 +0100, you wrote:

This must be a scam. As Jed said, at the point where the craft is going 
downwind at the speed of the wind, the relative wind across the propeller 
would be zero so it could not accelerate from this point on. If it did, the 
force from the prop would reverse anyway. Even more obviously, if it can 
accelerate from a position of zero relative wind then one could start it off 
in no wind conditions and it would accelerate - perpetual motion just isn't 
that easy!

---
I've attached a drawing which shows basically how Thin Air Design's
Blackbird vehicle works.

Note that with the wind pushing the cart and the pitch of the
propeller as shown, the wind would, intuitively, be forcing the
propeller to rotate counter-clockwise as viewed from the rear of the
cart.

However, such is not the case.

What's really happening is that the wind is pushing on the prop,
forcing the cart to move forward, and the torque generated by the
wheels is coupled to the prop in such a way as to cause the prop to
rotate clockwise when viewed from the rear.

This direction of rotation makes the prop a pusher, and will
increase the apparent force of the wind. 

As long as the wind is blowing from the rear, the cart will accelerate
until it reaches wind speed, when the wind speed will effectively be
zero.

However, because of the prop's action as a pusher, the cart will be
going a little faster than wind speed, at wind speed.  Then, as soon
as the prop feels the headwind it'll stop being a propeller and will
become a turbine, driving the wheels and accelerating into the
headwind until, eventually, everything settles out and the cart
reaches its speed limit. 

---

---
JF



Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-22 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From John Fields,

...

 Note that with the wind pushing the cart and the pitch of
 the propeller as shown, the wind would, intuitively, be
 forcing the propeller to rotate counter-clockwise as
 viewed from the rear of the cart.

 However, such is not the case.

 What's really happening is that the wind is pushing on
 the prop, forcing the cart to move forward, and the torque
 generated by the wheels is coupled to the prop in such a
 way as to cause the prop to rotate clockwise when viewed
 from the rear.

 This direction of rotation makes the prop a pusher,
 and will increase the apparent force of the wind.

 As long as the wind is blowing from the rear, the cart
 will accelerate until it reaches wind speed, when the
 wind speed will effectively be zero.

 However, because of the prop's action as a pusher, the
 cart will be going a little faster than wind speed, at
 wind speed.  Then, as soon as the prop feels the
 headwind it'll stop being a propeller and will become
 a turbine, driving the wheels and accelerating into the
 headwind until, eventually, everything settles out and
 the cart reaches its speed limit.

Well, I'll be keelhauled! Thanks for the clarification John.

My previous suggestion of using a control vehicle fitted with a
Viking-like sale is woefully inappropriate. It would be more accurate
to describe this vehicle's prop as TACKING through the wind. As most
sailors know, a sailboat tends to sail the fastest when sailing at an
angle of around 45 degrees INTO THE WIND. (I think maximum dynamics is
approx 45 degrees into the wind. Feel free to correct me on that
point, maitees.) The point being: Sailing closer into the wind seems
counter intuitive but it's the truth - insofar as sailboats are
concerned.

I can see it now. Sailors take note! This opens up a whole new
dimension to regatta races. You heard it here first!

Where's my parrot.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-22 Thread Lawrence de Bivort
Sailboats vary enormously in terms of their favored point of sailing.  I would 
guess that most sailboats do best with the wind on their beam (90 deg.)  My 
boat is best on that point, and I can also sail into the wind to about 28 
degrees without pinching, which is exceptionally.  Downwind is slow for me, so 
I often tack downwind, keeping main and gennie filled.

I wonder what race committees will say when a sailor shows up with this rig. 
Thinking of John's explanation, though, I suppose it will not work as there 
won't be any torque transmission from the wheels to the prop.

Right, John?

Cheers,
Lawry


On Sep 22, 2010, at 1:02 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:

 From John Fields,
 
 ...
 
 Note that with the wind pushing the cart and the pitch of
 the propeller as shown, the wind would, intuitively, be
 forcing the propeller to rotate counter-clockwise as
 viewed from the rear of the cart.
 
 However, such is not the case.
 
 What's really happening is that the wind is pushing on
 the prop, forcing the cart to move forward, and the torque
 generated by the wheels is coupled to the prop in such a
 way as to cause the prop to rotate clockwise when viewed
 from the rear.
 
 This direction of rotation makes the prop a pusher,
 and will increase the apparent force of the wind.
 
 As long as the wind is blowing from the rear, the cart
 will accelerate until it reaches wind speed, when the
 wind speed will effectively be zero.
 
 However, because of the prop's action as a pusher, the
 cart will be going a little faster than wind speed, at
 wind speed.  Then, as soon as the prop feels the
 headwind it'll stop being a propeller and will become
 a turbine, driving the wheels and accelerating into the
 headwind until, eventually, everything settles out and
 the cart reaches its speed limit.
 
 Well, I'll be keelhauled! Thanks for the clarification John.
 
 My previous suggestion of using a control vehicle fitted with a
 Viking-like sale is woefully inappropriate. It would be more accurate
 to describe this vehicle's prop as TACKING through the wind. As most
 sailors know, a sailboat tends to sail the fastest when sailing at an
 angle of around 45 degrees INTO THE WIND. (I think maximum dynamics is
 approx 45 degrees into the wind. Feel free to correct me on that
 point, maitees.) The point being: Sailing closer into the wind seems
 counter intuitive but it's the truth - insofar as sailboats are
 concerned.
 
 I can see it now. Sailors take note! This opens up a whole new
 dimension to regatta races. You heard it here first!
 
 Where's my parrot.
 
 Regards
 Steven Vincent Johnson
 www.OrionWorks.com
 www.zazzle.com/orionworks
 



Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-22 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From Lawry,

...

 I wonder what race committees will say when a sailor shows
 up with this rig. Thinking of John's explanation, though,
 I suppose it will not work as there won't be any torque
 transmission from the wheels to the prop.

Paddle wheels!

My parrot can squawk out Steamboat Willy better than yours!

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-22 Thread Ron Wormus

Here is a pretty good description of how it works:

http://scienceblogs.com/goodmath/2008/12/the_real_bozo_attempts_to_aton.php
Ron

--On Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:12 PM -0400 Lawrence de Bivort 
debiv...@evolutionaryservices.org wrote:



Sailboats vary enormously in terms of their favored point of sailing.  I would 
guess that most
sailboats do best with the wind on their beam (90 deg.)  My boat is best on 
that point, and I can
also sail into the wind to about 28 degrees without pinching, which is 
exceptionally.  Downwind
is slow for me, so I often tack downwind, keeping main and gennie filled.

I wonder what race committees will say when a sailor shows up with this rig. 
Thinking of John's
explanation, though, I suppose it will not work as there won't be any torque 
transmission from
the wheels to the prop.

Right, John?

Cheers,
Lawry


On Sep 22, 2010, at 1:02 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:


From John Fields,

...


Note that with the wind pushing the cart and the pitch of
the propeller as shown, the wind would, intuitively, be
forcing the propeller to rotate counter-clockwise as
viewed from the rear of the cart.

However, such is not the case.

What's really happening is that the wind is pushing on
the prop, forcing the cart to move forward, and the torque
generated by the wheels is coupled to the prop in such a
way as to cause the prop to rotate clockwise when viewed
from the rear.

This direction of rotation makes the prop a pusher,
and will increase the apparent force of the wind.

As long as the wind is blowing from the rear, the cart
will accelerate until it reaches wind speed, when the
wind speed will effectively be zero.

However, because of the prop's action as a pusher, the
cart will be going a little faster than wind speed, at
wind speed.  Then, as soon as the prop feels the
headwind it'll stop being a propeller and will become
a turbine, driving the wheels and accelerating into the
headwind until, eventually, everything settles out and
the cart reaches its speed limit.


Well, I'll be keelhauled! Thanks for the clarification John.

My previous suggestion of using a control vehicle fitted with a
Viking-like sale is woefully inappropriate. It would be more accurate
to describe this vehicle's prop as TACKING through the wind. As most
sailors know, a sailboat tends to sail the fastest when sailing at an
angle of around 45 degrees INTO THE WIND. (I think maximum dynamics is
approx 45 degrees into the wind. Feel free to correct me on that
point, maitees.) The point being: Sailing closer into the wind seems
counter intuitive but it's the truth - insofar as sailboats are
concerned.

I can see it now. Sailors take note! This opens up a whole new
dimension to regatta races. You heard it here first!

Where's my parrot.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks











Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-22 Thread John Fields
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:12:27 -0400, you wrote:

Sailboats vary enormously in terms of their favored point of sailing.
I would guess that most sailboats do best with the wind on their beam
(90 deg.)  My boat is best on that point, and I can also sail into the
wind to about 28 degrees without pinching, which is exceptionally.
Downwind is slow for me, so I often tack downwind, keeping main and
gennie filled.

I wonder what race committees will say when a sailor shows up with
this rig. Thinking of John's explanation, though, I suppose it will
not work as there won't be any torque transmission from the wheels to
the prop.

Right, John?

---
I think so since, even if the prop was coupled to an underwater screw,
the coeffiction of friction between the water and the screw would be
so much weaker than that between a wheel and the ground that it would
be hard to keep the prop from turning the wrong way initially.

---
JF



Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-22 Thread John Berry
Interesting effects from filming propellers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9Px9EAhyssfeature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9Px9EAhyssfeature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T055cp-JFUA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T055cp-JFUA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVwmtwZLG88feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVwmtwZLG88feature=related
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:23 AM, John Fields
jfie...@austininstruments.comwrote:

 On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:12:27 -0400, you wrote:

 Sailboats vary enormously in terms of their favored point of sailing.
 I would guess that most sailboats do best with the wind on their beam
 (90 deg.)  My boat is best on that point, and I can also sail into the
 wind to about 28 degrees without pinching, which is exceptionally.
 Downwind is slow for me, so I often tack downwind, keeping main and
 gennie filled.

 I wonder what race committees will say when a sailor shows up with
 this rig. Thinking of John's explanation, though, I suppose it will
 not work as there won't be any torque transmission from the wheels to
 the prop.

 Right, John?

 ---
 I think so since, even if the prop was coupled to an underwater screw,
 the coeffiction of friction between the water and the screw would be
 so much weaker than that between a wheel and the ground that it would
 be hard to keep the prop from turning the wrong way initially.

 ---
 JF




[Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-21 Thread Esa Ruoho
internets provides:

http://vimeo.com/10476453
We built a wind powered vehicle designed to go *directly* downwind - faster
than the wind. This is the first run of our first outing. We intended these
first attempts only as shakeout runs. But we ended up doing better than
our ultimate goal of twice windspeed. As a result, we've now set our goal at
3X windspeed.

This is the first run of the two days we spent on the lakebed in Ivanpah,
NV.

We've blanked out the audion in places since it wouldn't be responsible to
publish numbers that aren't official. We plan to make a well instrumented
official run before the officials of the North American Land Sailing
Association soon. Once that data has been certified we will publish all
data.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHsXcHoJu-A
Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)


[Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW) (continued)

2010-09-21 Thread Esa Ruoho
also:
http://www.fasterthanthewind.org/



internets provides:

 http://vimeo.com/10476453
 We built a wind powered vehicle designed to go *directly* downwind - faster
 than the wind. This is the first run of our first outing. We intended these
 first attempts only as shakeout runs. But we ended up doing better than
 our ultimate goal of twice windspeed. As a result, we've now set our goal at
 3X windspeed.

 This is the first run of the two days we spent on the lakebed in Ivanpah,
 NV.

 We've blanked out the audion in places since it wouldn't be responsible to
 publish numbers that aren't official. We plan to make a well instrumented
 official run before the officials of the North American Land Sailing
 Association soon. Once that data has been certified we will publish all
 data.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHsXcHoJu-A
 Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)



Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
I do not see how this can work! They are going with the wind, so if 
they start to travel at the same speed as the wind, the propeller 
should stop turning.


Maybe I am missing something.

- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-21 Thread Alexander Hollins
well, their own speed would let the prop spin as drag, but it would
have to slow down eventually.

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
 I do not see how this can work! They are going with the wind, so if they
 start to travel at the same speed as the wind, the propeller should stop
 turning.

 Maybe I am missing something.

 - Jed





RE: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-21 Thread Jones Beene
Wouldn't you know - they even have a url

http://www.fasterthanthewind.org/



-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell 

I do not see how this can work! They are going with the wind, so if 
they start to travel at the same speed as the wind, the propeller 
should stop turning.

Maybe I am missing something.

- Jed





Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-21 Thread Lawrence de Bivort
I am guessing that the propeller propels a belt/chain which is geared into the 
wheels.

Lawry


On Sep 21, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:

 I do not see how this can work! They are going with the wind, so if they 
 start to travel at the same speed as the wind, the propeller should stop 
 turning.
 
 Maybe I am missing something.
 
 - Jed
 



Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-21 Thread John Fields
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:26:47 -0400, you wrote:

I do not see how this can work! They are going with the wind, so if 
they start to travel at the same speed as the wind, the propeller 
should stop turning.

Maybe I am missing something.

- Jed

---
Notice from the pitch of the propeller and its rotation that it's
turning in the wrong direction if it's being driven like a turbine.

As I understand it, what's happening is that the drag from the prop
(and everything else at the rear of the vehicle) is being used to push
the vehicle forward and turn the wheels, and the wheels are geared to
the prop in a way to make it turn backwards.

So, while the wheels are causing the prop to spin until the vehicle
achieves wind speed, after that it'll be heading into the wind, the
prop will start acting like a turbine, and the torque developed will
be used to turn the wheels and make the vehicle run upwind,

---
JF



Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-21 Thread jwinter

 On 9/22/2010 1:26 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I do not see how this can work! They are going with the wind, so if 
they start to travel at the same speed as the wind, the propeller 
should stop turning.


Maybe I am missing something.
Yes what an interesting puzzle!  But knowing that it can be done and 
armed with the clues that the device has wheels and a propeller - it 
doesn't take very long to figure out how it could be done.


Consider the fact that it takes almost no energy to travel at the same 
speed with the wind, and also consider that since you have access to 
both the air (via the propeller) and the ground (via the wheels), and 
since these things are in motion with respect to each other (the wind), 
it must be possible to extract energy from that differential motion and 
use it to drive the device faster than the wind.  The only question is how!


Now suppose the wheels have a circumference of say 1 meter and suppose 
we set the pitch of the propeller so that it also has a screw pitch of 1 
meter per revolution and then suppose we connect these two things 
together with a 1:1 drive shaft arrangement.  Now we have the situation 
that no matter what speed the device moves at *in still air*, the 
propeller slices perfectly edgewise through the air and produces no 
thrust or drag force via the propeller or wheels.


Now supposing we cut the shaft and interpose an electrical generator in 
the shaft so that its stator is linked to the wheels and its rotor is 
linked to the propeller.  Now we have built a windmill generator that 
works identically regardless of its motion along the ground!  If there 
is no wind then no matter what speed it rolls at with respect to the 
air, no power is produced or consumed by the generator.  But supposing 
there is some wind - then again no matter what speed it rolls at with 
respect to the wind - the wind produces the same differential motion 
between the stator and armature and thus exactly the same power whether 
it is moving or stationary!


So this is the type of device we are looking for.  It can roll along at 
the same speed as the wind - consuming almost negligible energy in air 
friction (because it is not moving relative to the air) and only a 
minute amount of energy in wheel and shaft bearing friction (thanks to 
modern bearings etc) - and all the time it can be generating exactly the 
same power as if it was locked to the ground with the wind driving the 
generator via the propeller in the normal manner.  Clearly this power is 
available to be used to drive the device faster than the minimal 
friction situation of rolling at the same speed as the wind.


The only remaining question is the actual detail of how this available 
power can be most efficiently applied to the wheels.  My guess is that 
you don't bother with a generator but simply have a variable ratio gear 
box between the propeller and wheels.  Or simplest of all have a 
variable pitch propeller!




Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-21 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Quite baffling. I love the amount of conjecture this tiny little
transportation device has spontaneously generated within the Vort
Collective. Nice to see that the Vort juices haven't completely
atrophied. Creative conjecture of this sort seems to have been kind of
sparse lately! ;-) I still remain skeptical of the claims, but would
enjoy being proven wrong.

This device reminds me of a gyro-copter, albeit a grounded
gyro-copter. I wonder if similar laws of physics are involved.

At present there are inadequate controls, IMHO. I wish they had a
similar device outfitted with traditional sales akin to a Viking ship
running alongside the one with the ingenious prop design. Would be
nice to make speed comparisons as they throw spears at each other.

Yeah, that's it... A lack of adequate controls. That's what's bugging
me. More controls please!

Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-21 Thread Lawrence de Bivort
I think we can think of this in terms of three phases:
1. Start from a dead stop
2. Acceleration to a speed superior to that of the wind
3. Post acceleration performance

1. I am guessing that the contraption just starts moving forward because of the 
push of the wind on its vertical surface, e.g. prop, structure, passenger 
cockpit, etc.
No wind = no movement
Note how slowly the thing starts to move.

2. As the wind increases the speed of the prop, it transmits more power via a 
belt/chain to the wheels, probably via a fixed gearing, but it could be variable
The wind keeps pushing the thing until its speed equals that of the 
wind. When the speed exceeds that of the wind, the thing faces a drag. I am 
going to guess that the thing moves faster than the speed of the wind for a 
(short) while due to the mass/kinetics/momentum of the prop, which continue 
after reaching wind speed/vehicle speed equilibrium and so impart some energy 
to the wheels to exceed wind speed.

3. But how long can this excess speed be maintained? The clip shows the vehicle 
slowing pretty quickly after it exceeds the wind speed. This is attributed to 
the brakes in the clip, but perhaps it is no more than drop in the 
mass/kinetics/momentum of the prop that occurs when the wind is no longer 
maintaining its speed-increasing motion.

Assuming the thing works as advertised, I suppose the vehicle could move 
downwind with an oscillating speed, dropping to the point where the prop begins 
to supply positive drive, and then re-accelerating to the point where wind 
speed is no longer sufficient to do so.

Of course, we are making one critical assumption: that the vehicle is actually 
moving straight down-wind, rather than at an angle to it. (Think of a 
gyrocopter, mounted vertically, with the wind providing the forward thrust.)

Interestingand impressive to a sailor like me who has often cursed 
down-wind speeds.

Lawry



On Sep 21, 2010, at 2:41 PM, Lawrence de Bivort wrote:

 I am guessing that the propeller propels a belt/chain which is geared into 
 the wheels.
 
 Lawry
 
 
 On Sep 21, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
 
 I do not see how this can work! They are going with the wind, so if they 
 start to travel at the same speed as the wind, the propeller should stop 
 turning.
 
 Maybe I am missing something.
 
 - Jed
 
 



RE: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-21 Thread Jones Beene
Ah yes, it is the old mystery of capturing apparent wind.

Apparent wind is the wind that you make yourself i.e. you feel on your
face as you move forward such as on a bicycle. True wind is the wind that is
blowing naturally. 

There is a long-forgotten way it could be done today, with huge OU
implications, you know: capturing the very wind you make yourself g

... for those who do not appreciate a little humor, stop here.

http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/07/propeller-drives-novel-bicycle/

Hey, had this guy not caved into the expert scientists of the day, those
that said he could not capture some of his own apparent wind, we might all
be riding wind-cycles today :)

Maybe the Russians are using the technique on the this helicopter, which
seems to be getting a massive amount of lift with almost no blade speed ...
cough, cough.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgvuQGY946g

Seriously vorticians, if you pedal into the wind on a bicycle, your leg
torque overcomes both kinds of wind drag. The proper comparison is between
torque and drag. Same with the torque from the wheels of a land sailor.
Never mind that some of the torque comes from the wind you make yourself
even though, above the speed of true wind there is additional drag. At least
between 1x and 3x true wind, it appears there is no net drag (vs torque
extracted) in a good design.

Jones





Re: [Vo]:Downwind Faster than the Wind (DWFTTW)

2010-09-21 Thread Terry Blanton
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:

 Maybe the Russians are using the technique on the this helicopter, which
 seems to be getting a massive amount of lift with almost no blade speed ...
 cough, cough.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgvuQGY946g


Personally, I liked the twin rotor vid that popped up on the
suggestions column:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQKyxw8Sa9MNR=1

T