Re: [Vo]:New article / Rossi quotes

2011-11-04 Thread Peter Gluck 
Peter
I was born in Temeswar many years ago, this town was then
penta-national and tetra-linguistic; I have learned German from childhood.
Later I have forgotten Serbian but have learned
English, Russian French Italian- all very useful when you are
a researcher.
For my best German friend please search for "Kaltwasaser doctrine" if you
have time.
Peter

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:

>  Am 04.11.2011 19:19, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
>
>>  Am 04.11.2011 06:59, schrieb Peter Gluck:
>>
>> Very well written paper. Bravissimo, Haiko!
>>
>>  If you understand german read my comment:
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>  Or, ask Mr. Google! See below. You have a remarkable imagination. If you
> believe half of what you wrote here you are a true believer indeed.
>
>   Yes indeed. But I firmly believe, Rossi has even more imagination and
> phantasy and creativity . ;-)
>
> Thanks for the translation. It is a little bit strange, but mostly
> understandable, if you know what the subject is.
> I had some typos in the original german text and google did not translate
> these.
>
> Peter
>
>  - Jed
>
>
>   Simple explanation (Edited by the author on 04:11:11 18:03)
> *Peter Heckert,  Peter Heckert* (1 post since 16:01:08)
>
> The previous demos are easily explainable.
> He has a wireless switch for the heater. Whenever
> no one looks at the power meter, he will turn the tide. This was
> not recorded.
> For hardship cases, it has a vacuum pump to the steam hose in
> the wall disappears. There he can suck the water and, if the
> reactor has an outlet to create a little bubble, so that one
> believes that all cooks. He has the visitors never inside the
> shown evaporator which was always sealed tightly.
> He could clean pump via a cable and compressed air.
> A phase change thermal buffer instead of the
> lead shielding can buffer the abrupt temperature changes.
> When he these procedures in some cases combined and more tricks
> has, then
> it can also lead gullible physics professors on the ice.
> He also invites so only one hand-picked people who are easily
> deceived. The critic Eckström he has, although in his
> forum was promised, probably not invited.
> Also, Brian Josephson, he has not invited, although officially he
> has said. In the blog of one of his close associates, Passi,
> is then read, Brian Josephson had not come around because he
> fears his scientific reputation. Ridiculous, if you
> know which ideas and theories he represents. He is a unique
> Beführworter LENR. Perhaps the editors can search times,
> which people were invited.
> he has invited a reporter Peter Svensson, AP News, which
> is not at all concerned with such things on iPhones and vorewiegend
> writing and computer technology. He even gave him a right of priority
> granted. Mr. Svensson has it but probably have preferred not
> to publish report, and now, of course, hawked, the
> truth would be censored.
> Rossi Had there can find nobody else, such as National
> Geographic or Scientific American? His claims Rossi could so easily
> proved, in his skills. Because he does not have to do is accept that his
> skills used to deceive. suspicions aroused, that the E-Cat just then had
> a leak and not to repair was when NASA scientists were present. These
> were then egebnislos move away again. As Rossi has probably a problem for
> such emergency cases built ;-). 1MW demonstration when the course was not
> so easy. Because the customer but was anonymous, it is doubtful that
> there ever was a real customer. Interestingly, however, is that nobody on
> the development of heat was interested in the 4-way ventilated cooler,
> which produced 470 kW has dissipated. That is about 4 cubic meter of air,
> the hot 100 ° is, per second. It could be used to heat a cathedral, and
> this energy was focused on a Grundfäche of about 25 m ^ 2! But none of
> the observers in the videos has a high remarks made ​​heat. Are these
> people for all deaf and blind, drugged and hypnotized , or 150% of
> ignorant people, including the present physicist Levi? Peter
>
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:New article / Rossi quotes

2011-11-04 Thread Peter Heckert 

Am 04.11.2011 19:19, schrieb Jed Rothwell:



On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Peter Heckert > wrote:


Am 04.11.2011 06:59, schrieb Peter Gluck:

Very well written paper. Bravissimo, Haiko!

If you understand german read my comment:




Or, ask Mr. Google! See below. You have a remarkable imagination. If 
you believe half of what you wrote here you are a true believer indeed.


Yes indeed. But I firmly believe, Rossi has even more imagination and 
phantasy and creativity . ;-)


Thanks for the translation. It is a little bit strange, but mostly 
understandable, if you know what the subject is.
I had some typos in the original german text and google did not 
translate these.


Peter

- Jed


  Simple explanation (Edited by the author on 04:11:11 18:03)

/Peter Heckert, Peter Heckert/ (1 post since 16:01:08)

The previous demos are easily explainable.
He has a wireless switch for the heater. Whenever
no one looks at the power meter, he will turn the tide. This was
not recorded.
For hardship cases, it has a vacuum pump to the steam hose in
the wall disappears. There he can suck the water and, if the
reactor has an outlet to create a little bubble, so that one
believes that all cooks. He has the visitors never inside the
shown evaporator which was always sealed tightly.
He could clean pump via a cable and compressed air.
A phase change thermal buffer instead of the
lead shielding can buffer the abrupt temperature changes.
When he these procedures in some cases combined and more tricks
has, then
it can also lead gullible physics professors on the ice.
He also invites so only one hand-picked people who are easily
deceived. The critic Eckström he has, although in his
forum was promised, probably not invited.
Also, Brian Josephson, he has not invited, although officially he
has said. In the blog of one of his close associates, Passi,
is then read, Brian Josephson had not come around because he
fears his scientific reputation. Ridiculous, if you
know which ideas and theories he represents. He is a unique
Beführworter LENR. Perhaps the editors can search times,
which people were invited.
he has invited a reporter Peter Svensson, AP News, which
is not at all concerned with such things on iPhones and vorewiegend
writing and computer technology. He even gave him a right of priority
granted. Mr. Svensson has it but probably have preferred not
to publish report, and now, of course, hawked, the
truth would be censored.
Rossi Had there can find nobody else, such as National
Geographic or Scientific American? His claims Rossi could so easily 
proved, in his skills. Because he does not have to do is accept that 
his skills used to deceive. suspicions aroused, that the E-Cat just 
then had a leak and not to repair was when NASA scientists were 
present. These were then egebnislos move away again. As Rossi has 
probably a problem for such emergency cases built ;-). 1MW 
demonstration when the course was not so easy. Because the customer 
but was anonymous, it is doubtful that there ever was a real customer. 
Interestingly, however, is that nobody on the development of heat was 
interested in the 4-way ventilated cooler, which produced 470 kW has 
dissipated. That is about 4 cubic meter of air, the hot 100 ° is, per 
second. It could be used to heat a cathedral, and this energy was 
focused on a Grundfäche of about 25 m ^ 2! But none of the observers 
in the videos has a high remarks made ​​heat. Are these people for all 
deaf and blind, drugged and hypnotized , or 150% of ignorant people, 
including the present physicist Levi? Peter

Re: [Vo]:New article / Rossi quotes

2011-11-04 Thread Jed Rothwell 
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:

>  Am 04.11.2011 06:59, schrieb Peter Gluck:
>
> Very well written paper. Bravissimo, Haiko!
>
> If you understand german read my comment:
>
> 
>
>
Or, ask Mr. Google! See below. You have a remarkable imagination. If you
believe half of what you wrote here you are a true believer indeed.

- Jed


Simple explanation (Edited by the author on 04:11:11 18:03)
*Peter Heckert,  Peter Heckert* (1 post since 16:01:08)

The previous demos are easily explainable.
He has a wireless switch for the heater. Whenever
no one looks at the power meter, he will turn the tide. This was
not recorded.
For hardship cases, it has a vacuum pump to the steam hose in
the wall disappears. There he can suck the water and, if the
reactor has an outlet to create a little bubble, so that one
believes that all cooks. He has the visitors never inside the
shown evaporator which was always sealed tightly.
He could clean pump via a cable and compressed air.
A phase change thermal buffer instead of the
lead shielding can buffer the abrupt temperature changes.
When he these procedures in some cases combined and more tricks
has, then
it can also lead gullible physics professors on the ice.
He also invites so only one hand-picked people who are easily
deceived. The critic Eckström he has, although in his
forum was promised, probably not invited.
Also, Brian Josephson, he has not invited, although officially he
has said. In the blog of one of his close associates, Passi,
is then read, Brian Josephson had not come around because he
fears his scientific reputation. Ridiculous, if you
know which ideas and theories he represents. He is a unique
Beführworter LENR. Perhaps the editors can search times,
which people were invited.
he has invited a reporter Peter Svensson, AP News, which
is not at all concerned with such things on iPhones and vorewiegend
writing and computer technology. He even gave him a right of priority
granted. Mr. Svensson has it but probably have preferred not
to publish report, and now, of course, hawked, the
truth would be censored.
Rossi Had there can find nobody else, such as National
Geographic or Scientific American? His claims Rossi could so easily proved,
in his skills. Because he does not have to do is accept that his skills used
to deceive. suspicions aroused, that the E-Cat just then had a leak and not
to repair was when NASA scientists were present. These were then egebnislos
move away again. As Rossi has probably a problem for such emergency cases
built ;-). 1MW demonstration when the course was not so easy. Because the
customer but was anonymous, it is doubtful that there ever was a real
customer. Interestingly, however, is that nobody on the development of heat was
interested in the 4-way ventilated cooler, which produced 470 kW has
dissipated. That is about 4 cubic meter of air, the hot 100 ° is, per
second. It could be used to heat a cathedral, and this energy was focused
on a Grundfäche of about 25 m ^ 2! But none of the observers in the videos
has a high remarks made ​​heat. Are these people for all deaf and blind,
drugged and hypnotized , or 150% of ignorant people, including the present
physicist Levi? Peter

Re: [Vo]:New article / Rossi quotes

2011-11-04 Thread Peter Heckert 

Am 04.11.2011 06:59, schrieb Peter Gluck:

Very well written paper. Bravissimo, Haiko!

If you understand german read my comment:


Peter

Peter

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Haiko Lietz > wrote:


Dear all,

I've published part 10 of my CF column in German online magazine
Telepolis. Of course it's about Rossi again:

http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/35/35803/1.html

People quoted:

- Andrea Rossi
- Jed Rothwell
- Giseppe Levi
- Horace Heffner
- Terry Blanton

Quotes from Andrea Rossi (Oct 9 2011) not used in the article:

> What was the purpose of the October 6 experiment?
SEE BELOW

> Did you use the secondary water circuit to measure output energy to
> avoid the wet steam criticism?
YES

> Why does output power momentarily rise when input power is cut?
> Do Pout (power out) and the Eout (Energy out) describe the net
excess,
> not the total?
THE REASON OF THIS IS CONFIDENTIAL

> Why was the experiment stopped after 7.5h instead of 12h? Is it
because
> the reaction became unstable?
THE TEST TIME HAS BEEN 12 HOURA, DURING WHICH WE HAD TO MAKE ALSO
WEIGHT, COOLING TO ALLOW TO DISASSEMBLE ALL THE PARTS TO PUT IN
EVIDENCE ALL THE INSTRUMENTATION, TO DISASSEMBLE THE INSULATION TO
ALLOW TO SEE EVERYTHING POSSIBLE. THE 12 HOURA WERE FOR ALL OF
THIS, AND ALL HAS BEEN MADE AS SCHEDULED, FROM 9,30 A.M. TO 11,30 P.M.

> What does the device „producing frequencies“ do?
CONFIDENTIAL




--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:New article / Rossi quotes

2011-11-03 Thread Peter Gluck 
Very well written paper. Bravissimo, Haiko!
Peter

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Haiko Lietz  wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I've published part 10 of my CF column in German online magazine
> Telepolis. Of course it's about Rossi again:
>
> http://www.heise.de/tp/**artikel/35/35803/1.html
>
> People quoted:
>
> - Andrea Rossi
> - Jed Rothwell
> - Giseppe Levi
> - Horace Heffner
> - Terry Blanton
>
> Quotes from Andrea Rossi (Oct 9 2011) not used in the article:
>
> > What was the purpose of the October 6 experiment?
> SEE BELOW
>
> > Did you use the secondary water circuit to measure output energy to
> > avoid the wet steam criticism?
> YES
>
> > Why does output power momentarily rise when input power is cut?
> > Do Pout (power out) and the Eout (Energy out) describe the net excess,
> > not the total?
> THE REASON OF THIS IS CONFIDENTIAL
>
> > Why was the experiment stopped after 7.5h instead of 12h? Is it because
> > the reaction became unstable?
> THE TEST TIME HAS BEEN 12 HOURA, DURING WHICH WE HAD TO MAKE ALSO WEIGHT,
> COOLING TO ALLOW TO DISASSEMBLE ALL THE PARTS TO PUT IN EVIDENCE ALL THE
> INSTRUMENTATION, TO DISASSEMBLE THE INSULATION TO ALLOW TO SEE EVERYTHING
> POSSIBLE. THE 12 HOURA WERE FOR ALL OF THIS, AND ALL HAS BEEN MADE AS
> SCHEDULED, FROM 9,30 A.M. TO 11,30 P.M.
>
> > What does the device „producing frequencies“ do?
> CONFIDENTIAL
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:New article / Rossi quotes

2011-11-03 Thread Haiko Lietz 

Dear all,

I've published part 10 of my CF column in German online magazine 
Telepolis. Of course it's about Rossi again:


http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/35/35803/1.html

People quoted:

- Andrea Rossi
- Jed Rothwell
- Giseppe Levi
- Horace Heffner
- Terry Blanton

Quotes from Andrea Rossi (Oct 9 2011) not used in the article:

> What was the purpose of the October 6 experiment?
SEE BELOW

> Did you use the secondary water circuit to measure output energy to
> avoid the wet steam criticism?
YES

> Why does output power momentarily rise when input power is cut?
> Do Pout (power out) and the Eout (Energy out) describe the net excess,
> not the total?
THE REASON OF THIS IS CONFIDENTIAL

> Why was the experiment stopped after 7.5h instead of 12h? Is it because
> the reaction became unstable?
THE TEST TIME HAS BEEN 12 HOURA, DURING WHICH WE HAD TO MAKE ALSO 
WEIGHT, COOLING TO ALLOW TO DISASSEMBLE ALL THE PARTS TO PUT IN EVIDENCE 
ALL THE INSTRUMENTATION, TO DISASSEMBLE THE INSULATION TO ALLOW TO SEE 
EVERYTHING POSSIBLE. THE 12 HOURA WERE FOR ALL OF THIS, AND ALL HAS BEEN 
MADE AS SCHEDULED, FROM 9,30 A.M. TO 11,30 P.M.


> What does the device „producing frequencies“ do?
CONFIDENTIAL