Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-02-05 Thread Alan Fletcher
Don't hold your breath . 


Broenink
February 5th, 2013 at 12:17 PM

Daar Mr. Rossi,

With the verification of your technology being imminent can you please tell us 
who financed the independent research and the report which will be published 
shorty?

Andrea Rossi
February 5th, 2013 at 1:19 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=785cpage=1#comment-613009

Dear Broenink:
The third party indipendent validation tests have been funded directly by some 
of the Universities ( not Italian) which are making the tests. All the expenses 
for instrumentation, men hours, hotel, restaurants, taxi etc have been paid 
indipendently by the Entities who are making the indipendent validation. This 
is the reason why
1- the report will be published indipendently from the results
2- we cannot know anything of the date of the publication
3- we do not know where the publication will be made
4- we do not know exactly when the tests, that are still in the making, will be 
finished. Lately I have been informed that more tests will be made to be sure 
of the results, repeating again the tests.
5- we can assist to the tests, but we cannot make any operation during the 
tests.
6- the reason for which all these scientists are making these tests and for 
which their Universities are paying the expenses is merely scientific
Thank you for your questions,
Warm Regards,
A.R.


Andrea Rossi
February 4th, 2013 at 5:42 PM

Dear Giuseppe:
Thank you for this question.
We are working with the Hot Cat ( the E-Cat at high temperature) since May 
2012. The improvements have been remarkable, because we passed from a 
conceptual prototype to industrial plants that are in construction. The third 
party tests in course are made on a module of the Hot Cat for industrial 
applications. We are at the level of safety certification too. As for the 
theoretical issues, strong improvement has been done too. Personally, I think 
we have understood very well the phenomenon’s sources and this has improved the 
technology.
Warm Regards,
A.R.



Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-02-05 Thread Alan Fletcher
 From: Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
 Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 11:43:10 AM
 
 Don't hold your breath .
 

Andrea Rossi
February 5th, 2013 at 2:42 PM

Dear Koen Vandewalle:
The scientists are still working and I have no idea of what they are
thinking. I do not think we will know what they know and what they
think before the publication of the report.
About what we are doing: I do not know if it is big or not. All I know
is that we are working very hard to deliver the industrial plant we
have to put in operation as scheduled. In Great Britain they say: my
garden is smaller that England, but bigger than a stamp.
Warm Regards,
A.R.



Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-02-05 Thread Jed Rothwell
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:


 In Great Britain they say: my garden is smaller that  England, but bigger
 than a stamp.


OOOkay. Does anyone want to hazard a guess as to what that might mean?


In Japan they say fools and caterpillars like to climb up things. I just
learned that yesterday. Not sure what that means either, but it's funny.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-02-05 Thread Rob Dingemans

Hi,

On 5-2-2013 23:49, Jed Rothwell wrote:

Alan Fletcher a...@well.com mailto:a...@well.com wrote:

In Great Britain they say: my garden is smaller that  England, but
bigger than a stamp.


OOOkay. Does anyone want to hazard a guess as to what that might mean?


Found a similar quote on this page 
(http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/Asterix-in-Britain):




Trivia

  * In French, Obelix remarks on the tweed worn by Asterix's Briton
cousin, asking, Is it expensive? (c'est cher?); the Briton
replies, My tailor is rich (mon tailleur est riche) --- an
allusion to basic lessons in English, available in many European
states. It has been said that My tailor is rich was the very
first spoken phrase said in the first Assimil
http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/Assimil English without
Pain (Anglais sans Peine) English learning vinyl record volume
released circa 1960 http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/1960.

  * Later there's another gag with the same basic premise in reverse:
when Asterix remarks that his cousin's boat is small, Anticlimax
replies obscurely, It's smaller than the garden of my uncle, but
larger than the pen of my aunt, a phrase used in English texts of
the period when teaching French.



It seems, that Andrea is actually saying something like: I really have 
no clue what those scientists who are performing the tests are thinking, 
so I can't comment on it at all.


Kind regards,

Rob


Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-01-20 Thread Terry Blanton
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/01/rossi-peer-review-by-high-level-magazine-to-take-all-of-february/

Popsci?



Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-01-20 Thread Daniel Rocha
That's not peer reviewed.

But there's in general not a fixed period for peer review. The
communication between referees and authors can take anything from immediate
acceptance until years.


2013/1/20 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com


 http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/01/rossi-peer-review-by-high-level-magazine-to-take-all-of-february/

 Popsci?




-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com


Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-01-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
Rossi said it is a magazine but he might mean a journal. Magazines are
not usually peer-reviewed. Rossi's English is good but he sometimes mixes
up words like magazine and journal.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-01-20 Thread Daniel Rocha
That`s because in Italian, or in most latin languages, the words are the
same.


2013/1/20 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com

 Rossi said it is a magazine but he might mean a journal. Magazines are
 not usually peer-reviewed. Rossi's English is good but he sometimes mixes
 up words like magazine and journal.

 - Jed




-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com


Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-01-20 Thread Terry Blanton
It was humor.  sigh



Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-01-19 Thread Susanna Gipp
Unless it's another hot air balloon launch to earn time and keep its
supporters happy...  Who knows?


2013/1/18 David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com

 I have my fingers crossed.


Dave, don't hold them too long otherwise you're going to have them blocked
forever
Cheers


Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-01-19 Thread David Roberson
I forgot to mention that I accidentally used super glue to hold them in place!  
My opinion of Rossi is going to be very much determined by when this report 
comes out and what it says.  If it is delayed forever in a similar fashion to 
what has been typical of the past, I will start to believe MY a bit more.  
Someone needs to actually openly build or sell some type of LENR device to keep 
me actively interested in the field.  


The MFMP guys are great and I have faith that they will come up with the proof 
that should start the revolution.  So far the MFMP results are not quite 
substantiated, according to my analysis,  but are getting close and will 
require further detailed calibration.  Unfortunately, I am only expecting their 
device to put out excess power of approximately 1 watt when it is working 
properly.  This was estimated by assuming Rossi's results are accurate and that 
both achieve similar surface area power densities.


The best that I can do for now is to keep supporting the overall efforts with 
my analytical skills.  One day I hope to see all my effort pay off.  We all 
need some good Karma.


Dave 




-Original Message-
From: Susanna Gipp susan.g...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Jan 19, 2013 3:09 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News


Unless it's another hot air balloon launch to earn time and keep its supporters 
happy...  Who knows?



2013/1/18 David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com

I have my fingers crossed.



Dave, don't hold them too long otherwise you're going to have them blocked 
forever
Cheers


 



Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-01-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
Susanna Gipp susan.g...@gmail.com wrote:

Unless it's another hot air balloon launch to earn time and keep its
 supporters happy...  Who knows?


Earn time from who, for what? The Patent Office does not care how long he
takes. If his bank account is falling, he will not make it last longer by
making exaggerated claims. No other clock is running

Rossi has done nothing to keep his supporters happy. On the contrary, he
has infuriated most of his financial supporters, and reporters, and members
of the public. He has refused to do a demo. He has cancelled contracts with
the university and others, and picked fights with NASA and others.

I do not know what makes him tick, but I have not seen him do anything that
improve his public relations. I would say he is a PR trainwreck.

I do not see what you are talking about here. He earns no time and he makes
no one happy. His actions, motivations and goals are a mystery to me. You
imply that he benefits from these shenanigans, but I do not see how, or why.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-01-19 Thread Peter Gluck
I still think that the most probable scenario of Rossi's behavior is the
follpwing:

*technically:*
- he has indeed discovered a method to enhance excess heat in the Ni-H
system;\
-it is difficult to convert this enhanced excess heat in a controllable,
manageable long duration energy source; he has tried a lot and therefore we
have seen a lot of kinds of E-cats, some of them in a series of experiments
in which Rossi has tried to combine real enhancement with enhancement bt
measurement;
- the coming Hot Cat 3rd party experiment will be very probably
non-spectacular but will also exclude the idea that the Hot Cat does not
generate excess heat;

*managerially*
- i don't know if he really has a great partner, but he needs one good due
to the highly difficult problems to be solved- mainly engineering;
- know how management- I think his zeroth order of priority is keeping
secret what he does technicaly, ergo he will never describe his real
process in a good patent as that EP of Piantelli
his yearning for a patent is fairy tale
- his strategy is oriented toward the domination of the market, kind of
exclusivity as long as possible
so it is a historical luck and chance that DGT exists and has superior
engineering, scientific understanding and management

*psychologically*
AR is structurally a nice, sometimes even charming person, but being scared
for losing the competition, stressed by the failures and blundesr from his
past, being a very strong alpha character his ability to cooperate is low
and functionally he is a very difficult person.
In historical perspective, the virtues of the E-cats
will decide what happens- energy source or not energy source?
If I disagree 80% with Rossi's deeds, the disagreement is 115% with the
professional Rossi killers.
Peter


On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:

 Susanna Gipp susan.g...@gmail.com wrote:

 Unless it's another hot air balloon launch to earn time and keep its
 supporters happy...  Who knows?


 Earn time from who, for what? The Patent Office does not care how long he
 takes. If his bank account is falling, he will not make it last longer by
 making exaggerated claims. No other clock is running

 Rossi has done nothing to keep his supporters happy. On the contrary, he
 has infuriated most of his financial supporters, and reporters, and members
 of the public. He has refused to do a demo. He has cancelled contracts with
 the university and others, and picked fights with NASA and others.

 I do not know what makes him tick, but I have not seen him do anything
 that improve his public relations. I would say he is a PR trainwreck.

 I do not see what you are talking about here. He earns no time and he
 makes no one happy. His actions, motivations and goals are a mystery to me.
 You imply that he benefits from these shenanigans, but I do not see how, or
 why.

 - Jed




-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


RE: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-01-19 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
From Peter:

 I still think that the most probable scenario of Rossi's behavior is the
follpwing:

[snip]

Let me just reply with:

Yes,
Yes, and
Yes.

...plus the fact that Rossi is both a prima donna and a loose cannon. It
seems the combination makes for many unstable scenarios. Some which are
entertaining.

Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



[Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-01-18 Thread Alan Fletcher

January 17th, 2013 at 10:36 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=776cpage=2#comment-565344

Dear tomconover:

I did not read the report, yet, because it has not been published 
yet. By the way, the Third Party members returned this week to make 
more tests to clear some points that they had to repeat, while I am 
in Miami. I know that there are skeptics too.
I fear we will have to wait for the publication to know about the 
report. Maybe I will have its final version the day before the 
publication, maybe not.

About the plantas, they are in construction.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

Bad news : yet another jam-tomorrow deferment

Good news: Could be to clarify a point raised during peer-review


(lenr.qumbu.com -- analyzing the Rossi/Focardi eCat  -- and the 
defkalion hyperion -- Hi, google!) 



Re: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News

2013-01-18 Thread David Roberson
If they actually returned to perform more tests then it most likely is a good 
sign.  Had the ECAT been a total failure, it is unlikely that they would bother 
to recheck it.


I have my fingers crossed.


Dave



-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Jan 18, 2013 5:01 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Rossi Third-Party Paper : Good News / Bad News


January 17th, 2013 at 10:36 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=776cpage=2#comment-565344

Dear tomconover:

I did not read the report, yet, because it has not been published 
yet. By the way, the Third Party members returned this week to make 
more tests to clear some points that they had to repeat, while I am 
in Miami. I know that there are skeptics too.
I fear we will have to wait for the publication to know about the 
report. Maybe I will have its final version the day before the 
publication, maybe not.
About the plantas, they are in construction.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

Bad news : yet another jam-tomorrow deferment

Good news: Could be to clarify a point raised during peer-review


(lenr.qumbu.com -- analyzing the Rossi/Focardi eCat  -- and the 
defkalion hyperion -- Hi, google!)