[Wikitech-l] wiki page has embedded 'code error'
These things should be caught before the public sees them
$ w3m -dump 'http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/王力_(语言学家)'|grep error
緝code error!（5人名中都有「心」字）。
$ w3m -dump 'http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/王力_(语言学家)?action=raw'|grep 人名中都有
）、[[王缉慈]]（女）、[[王缉思]]、[[王缉憲|王缉-{zh-hans:憲;}-]]（5人名中都有「
Maybe templates should 'also report to their master' any time they
produce a 'code error'... if indeed a template is involved.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107621]: Revision status changed
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r107621 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107621 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107621: Fix indenting from r104642 ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r106509]: Revision status changed
SVG changed the status of MediaWiki.r106509 to deferred URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/106509 Old status: new New status: deferred Commit summary for MediaWiki.r106509: Change category links, only make links blue on non-help-page-fetching wikis, remove noarticletext et al messages per css ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r106555]: Revision status changed
SVG changed the status of MediaWiki.r106555 to deferred URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/106555 Old status: new New status: deferred Commit summary for MediaWiki.r106555: Fixing minor bugs in follow-up to r106527 ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r106511]: Revision status changed
SVG changed the status of MediaWiki.r106511 to new URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/106511 Old status: fixme New status: new Commit summary for MediaWiki.r106511: Renaming SpecialBatchUserRights.php to BatchUserRights_body.php, adapting aliases file and changing a message in two languages ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107603]: New comment added
VitaliyFilippov posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107603. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107603#c28677 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107603: Rewritten a discontinued extension. Should work with MW 1.13+ VitaliyFilippov's comment: These variables are passed as parameters, so deprecated globals are not needed... Will mw.config.get work on older MediaWiki's? ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107603]: New comment added
Nikerabbit posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107603. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107603#c28678 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107603: Rewritten a discontinued extension. Should work with MW 1.13+ Nikerabbit's comment: Not on the very olds because the don't have resource loader. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107610]: New comment added
Krinkle posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107610. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107610#c28679 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107610: [mediawiki.debug] highlight current pane and styling * wrapping bits in container and centering tabs * letting includes-pane use same markup and styling as queries * move appendTo action into common function (more DRY) Krinkle's comment: Hm.. will check out in a few hours. Thanks :) ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Wikimedia Based Open Source Project - Help On Licencing
Hi, I know that the software we use for our website is payed (www.whmcs.com) and you can add a wiki module. This module doesn't cost any extra money, but you can grap a add-on that costs money what will tune the Wiki CSS into your websites CSS (pretty cool do!) But this is just MediaWiki: http://docs.whmcs.com/Special:Version And the payed addon is a encrypte source code.. Best, Huib 2011/12/30 Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org On 30/12/11 08:30, Dan Collins wrote: On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote: It doesn't need to be compatible or open-source right? GPL 2.0 section 2 b: b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License. You can modify GPL software for private use. That clause only kicks in when you distribute or publish the work, so you're generally OK if you're just using it within a single company. Maybe that's what Huib meant by closed source. -- Tim Starling ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- Kind regards, Huib Laurens WickedWay.nl Webhosting the wicked way. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Wikimedia Based Open Source Project - Help On Licencing
Den 30-12-2011 05:02, Tim Starling skrev: You can modify GPL software for private use. That clause only kicks in when you distribute or publish the work, so you're generally OK if you're just using it within a single company. Maybe that's what Huib meant by closed source. distribute or publish covers wen you put your additions for download, or otherwise gives away copies. You can do any additions, keep it on your own servers, and sell the result to clients. -- Henning Wangerin Skoltoften 9, DK - 6400 Sonderborg www.alslug.dk - www.opensourcedays.org - www.ubuntudanmark.dk ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105612]: New comment added
Krinkle posted a comment on MediaWiki.r105612. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105612#c28680 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105612: * (bug 32879) Upgrade jQuery to 1.7.1 Tests in qunit still pass fine Krinkle's comment: [[jQuery]] ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107610]: New comment added
Nikerabbit posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107610. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107610#c28681 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107610: [mediawiki.debug] highlight current pane and styling * wrapping bits in container and centering tabs * letting includes-pane use same markup and styling as queries * move appendTo action into common function (more DRY) Nikerabbit's comment: Just FYI if it comes in need: Google Chrome 16.0.912.63 in Linux. Seen on http://translatewiki.net/sw/ ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Wikimedia Based Open Source Project - Help On Licencing
If you take a open source proyect, and develop another open source proyect based on it, you are forking. You must continue with the same license the original authors used. This is a must, if you can't convince all the original authors to allow you to use a different license (hard if theres a lot of then, easy if theres only one). Forking is fun, but heres a caveat: the original proyect may go faster and develop features you may need, but you cant have in your fork. Forking is a good idea if you want to follow different guidelines, not a good idea if you have the same ideas of the original authors. Forking is sometimes obligatory wen the original authors are stubborn and too slow to update a proyect. Sometimes forking is a good idea if the original proyect is poisoned by bloat, and you want to use a axe and remove all the complexity (perhaps that was the case of firefox?). Normally is not a good ideas, and all open source projects have smarted up and include most features in plugins, so the core is small, not bloated, and flexible for everyone need. On 29 December 2011 07:31, Sajith Vimukthi sajith@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, I am planning to develop a new Open Source project keeping mediawiki as the baseline. I wonder how the liciening policy of mediawiki will affect my intention. Could somebody help me on whether it is possible to develop my own app using mediawiki and distribute it as an opensource project? Thanks, Regards, Sajith Vimukthi Weerakoon, T .P No : ++94-716102392 ++94-727102392 ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- -- ℱin del ℳensaje. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r106295]: New comment added
Krinkle posted a comment on MediaWiki.r106295. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/106295#c28682 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r106295: Remove stray trailing commas on last items in array literals -- this breaks IE 6/7/8 Followup r105560 Krinkle's comment: Good idea, I might try something with the JSLint/JSHint API. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105619]: New comment added
Krinkle posted a comment on MediaWiki.r105619. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105619#c28683 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105619: Update jquery.effects Krinkle's comment: It's upstream, but we do it as well. It ensures undefined is undefined because unfortunately JavaScript allows a variable to be named undefined, both locally and globally. So if anywhere down the line between global scope and here someone thought it would be funny to do that, there's a problem. I think this is rather far fetched, but people seem to do it quite often (especially in plugins and frameworks that need to work everywhere). Another minor advantage (not a justification for this thought) is the scope. Normally undefined is global variable set to undefined, now it is a local variable instead of a global variable, which might speed up scripts that do a lot of comparisons which would otherwise have to bubble up the scope chain for each time undefined is referenced. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105619]: New comment added
Krinkle posted a comment on MediaWiki.r105619. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105619#c28684 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105619: Update jquery.effects Krinkle's comment: As of ECMAScript 5 undefined has become a non-writable global property. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102406]: New comment added
Krinkle posted a comment on MediaWiki.r102406.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102406#c28685
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102406:
* Use local context to get messages
* Changed three isset() to [!=]== null
Krinkle's comment:
pre+ } elseif( $from !== null $to == null ) {/pre
Was it intentional that one is strict and not the other ?
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102406]: New comment added
IAlex posted a comment on MediaWiki.r102406. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102406#c28686 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102406: * Use local context to get messages * Changed three isset() to [!=]== null IAlex's comment: Thanks! Fixed in r107631. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107631]: Revision status changed
^demon changed the status of MediaWiki.r107631 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107631 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107631: Per Krinkle, fix for r102406: use strict comparison ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107632]: Revision status changed
^demon changed the status of MediaWiki.r107632 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107632 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107632: svn:eol-style native ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107474]: Revision status changed
^demon changed the status of MediaWiki.r107474 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107474 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107474: integrated into post-merger extension ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107475]: New comment added
^demon posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107475. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107475#c28687 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107475: initial prep for localisation - not yet ready ^demon's comment: Remove the svn:executable property, it's not needed. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107329]: Revision status changed
^demon changed the status of MediaWiki.r107329 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107329 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107329: [Core JS] Remove long deprecated globals 'ta' and 'akeytt' * Not used anywhere in ./phase3/ * Not used anywhere in ./extensions/ * Deprecated in MediaWiki 1.16 according to HISTORY ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Wikimedia Based Open Source Project - Help On Licencing
- Original Message - From: Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org On 30/12/11 08:30, Dan Collins wrote: On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote: It doesn't need to be compatible or open-source right? GPL 2.0 section 2 b: b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License. You can modify GPL software for private use. That clause only kicks in when you distribute or publish the work, so you're generally OK if you're just using it within a single company. Maybe that's what Huib meant by closed source. And since we're not under the *Affero* GPL, you can modify it, *and make it publicly available*, and still not be constrained by the licence (I don't think I've got that backwards, do I?) Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274 ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Multilingual Wordpress
Salut Sébastien, On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Seb35 seb35wikipe...@gmail.com wrote: I tried last days to mass-translate blog posts of the Foundation’s blog, aiming at building a parallel blog in French with the same posts, translated [1]. Some people are interested in regularly translating blog posts. So my question is: is it possible to make the Foundation’s blog multilingual? The specific plug-in you linked to is described as pure alpha, so I wouldn't necessarily be comfortable enabling it on our production blog (at least not yet). In principle, I'm personally not opposed to having a multilingual setup on the Wikimedia blog, though. I think it's a great idea, at least worth trying out. And as far as I know, other Communications people also find the idea interesting. I researched the topic a few weeks ago following a discussion we had, and the best bet back then was the WPML plugin: http://wpml.org ; it's a commercial plugin but it's not too expensive, and they have a fee-waiving program for nonprofits. The plugin includes a translation workflow, but I haven't tried it out. So: possible? difficult? thoughts? I'd say: possible, probably desirable, and possibly not too difficult. The real trick is going to be the choice of the tool, since we want something that works, stays maintained and doesn't overly complicate our own setup. -- Guillaume Paumier Technical Communications Manager — Wikimedia Foundation http://donate.wikimedia.org ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[Wikitech-l] Mass changes to bugs by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
a user Jan Kucera (Kozuch) (with email of garba...@seznam.cz) has been mass changing the priority of bugs based on a very crude vote count. this is very disruptive and counter productive issue. I would ask that one of our devs mass revert this please. Johh ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Mass changes to bugs by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
+1 my mailbox just got spammed by him... 2011/12/30, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com: a user Jan Kucera (Kozuch) (with email of garba...@seznam.cz) has been mass changing the priority of bugs based on a very crude vote count. this is very disruptive and counter productive issue. I would ask that one of our devs mass revert this please. Johh ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- Verzonden vanaf mijn mobiele apparaat Kind regards, Huib Laurens WickedWay.nl Webhosting the wicked way. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[Wikitech-l] Bugzilla: Minor enhancements should not be tagged highest priority.
Greetings, On Bugzilla, bugs which are minor enhancements should not be tagged highest priority unless the priority is truly highest. This should certainly not be done en masse without personally reviewing the bug itself. Technological fact is not subject to democracy. Search showing bugs which may need checking: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?chfieldto=Nowchfield=priorityquery_format=advancedchfieldfrom=2011-12-29emaillongdesc1=1email1=garbage5%40seznam.czemailtype1=exactlist_id=72170 Examples of Highest priority probably minor feature requests or bugs: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14396 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12974 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8697 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19796 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6379 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5309 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3461 There are also numerous highest priority extension installations. --Dan ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugzilla: Minor enhancements should not be tagged highest priority.
- Original Message - From: Dan Collins en.wp.s...@gmail.com On Bugzilla, bugs which are minor enhancements should not be tagged highest priority unless the priority is truly highest. This should certainly not be done en masse without personally reviewing the bug itself. Technological fact is not subject to democracy. On my Bugzilla installations, the Severity is owned by the reporter, but the Priority by the assignee; this seems the best approach to me... Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274 ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Mass changes to bugs by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
Has anyone told him we don't use voting? -Chad On Dec 30, 2011 11:04 AM, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote: a user Jan Kucera (Kozuch) (with email of garba...@seznam.cz) has been mass changing the priority of bugs based on a very crude vote count. this is very disruptive and counter productive issue. I would ask that one of our devs mass revert this please. Johh ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Mass changes to bugs by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
As long as it's there, people will think that we do. This mass change should have been discussed somewhere first, but then i never understood why voting is bad. Mozilla haven't disabled it in their Bugzilla and Google use it in Google code (as stars), although i don't whether either of them actually prioritize bugs according to it. 2011/12/30 Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com: Has anyone told him we don't use voting? -Chad On Dec 30, 2011 11:04 AM, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote: a user Jan Kucera (Kozuch) (with email of garba...@seznam.cz) has been mass changing the priority of bugs based on a very crude vote count. this is very disruptive and counter productive issue. I would ask that one of our devs mass revert this please. Johh ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Mass changes to bugs by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:38, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote: As long as it's there, people will think that we do. This mass change should have been discussed somewhere first, but then i never understood why voting is bad. Mozilla haven't disabled it in their Bugzilla and Google use it in Google code (as stars), although i don't whether either of them actually prioritize bugs according to it. I thought stars were the only way to subscribe to future updates? and hence they're not necessarily votes. -Jeremy ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Mass changes to bugs by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Jeremy Baron jer...@tuxmachine.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:38, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote: As long as it's there, people will think that we do. This mass change should have been discussed somewhere first, but then i never understood why voting is bad. Mozilla haven't disabled it in their Bugzilla and Google use it in Google code (as stars), although i don't whether either of them actually prioritize bugs according to it. I thought stars were the only way to subscribe to future updates? and hence they're not necessarily votes. CC list? But yes, we've just never used the voting--it's mainly just there as a favorites type list. -Chad ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki 2.0
On Dec 7, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
* Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.org [Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:21:43
-0800]:
The hype of 2.0 aside, is there a guideline for what should
constitute
a
major version number change?
It looks like we are doing something like: Major.Minor.Release
1.18 = Major: 1, Minor: 18, (alpha|beta|etc.)
I'm just curious what people think would constitue a major version.
We've
certainly had major rewrites of systems in the past that didn't seem
to
justify a version bump. Is there anything wrong with having version
1.249?
Is there a practical reason for bumping the version at some point
(like
when the minor version hits tripple digits)?
Also, a rewrite of MediaWiki should for sure be done in Node.js :)
- Trevor
Is Javascript really that good? Some people dislike prototypical
inheritance, it seems that jQuery prefers to use wrappers instead
(that's a kind of suboptimal architecture). Also, Google had some
complains about Javascript flaws (for example primitive types don't
allow high performance available in Java / C#), suggesting to replace it
with something else.. Although having common clientside / serverside
codebase is nice thing, for sure. And there's nothing more widespread
than Javascript at client side. Also, it's object side is strong
(something like Lisp with C-syntax), however it does not have generics,
named parameters etc..
Dmitriy
I don't know how much you know about JavaScript but in my opinion it's often
misunderstood. I think it's superior than most other programming
languages because it's very expressive and it's simplicity is what allows
great complexity. Bad parts are kept in for compatibility, but once you start
treating those bad parts like they don't exist (by not using them, ever) one is
left with a language that is still as powerful. (btw, that's the great thing
for being
a developer, we have the power to basically remove parts of the language
without changing the standards or breaking other peoples code).
It's fairly easy to use it in a classical inheritance way, (i.e. use classes
that
extend from classes and use constructors for creating objects), which can't
be said for languages that use classical inheritance, there is no way to do
prototypal stuff there.
JavaScript's true power comes into play when using prototypal inheritance
directly (creating objects that inherit directly from other objects).
jQuery uses prototypal inheritance as well, it's what makes jQuery what it
is.
jQuery('#bodyContent').find( 'a' ).addClass( 'foobar' );
That chain is possible because the jQuery constructor (which is tucked away
and calling jQuery( .. ) just does return new jQuery.fn.init( .. );) which
creates an object that inherits all members in jQuery.prototype and does so
by reference (not by value)
So when a jQuery plugin is loaded onto the page at any time (that defines
jQuery.prototype.myPlugin), all existing jQuery objects will have that method.
And because all those methods return this, you can call another method on
the return value in a chain, and so on.
jQuery did choose not to extend the browsers' native objects' prototypes but
that's purely a policy created because of how browsers work not because of
how the language itself work, it's technically possible and other libraries such
as MooTools do do that.
Indeed it's functions are primary citizens and object system is what makes it
so strong.
Since virtually any value other than null and undefined is an object, including
numbers,
strings and functions.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Mass changes to bugs by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
Revert it. Just like enwiki, you can't do stuff like this without discussion. On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Jeremy Baron jer...@tuxmachine.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:38, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote: As long as it's there, people will think that we do. This mass change should have been discussed somewhere first, but then i never understood why voting is bad. Mozilla haven't disabled it in their Bugzilla and Google use it in Google code (as stars), although i don't whether either of them actually prioritize bugs according to it. I thought stars were the only way to subscribe to future updates? and hence they're not necessarily votes. CC list? But yes, we've just never used the voting--it's mainly just there as a favorites type list. -Chad ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- John ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107315]: New comment added
Duplicatebug posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107315. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107315#c28688 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107315: fix for bug 33372, disabling CentralNotice on Special pages Duplicatebug's comment: I am not sure, if disabling on Special:Watchlist is good, because some users are only checking his watchlist (per bookmark and activ remember me cookie), to see, if some important thing is one the wiki and not looking at any other pages. When the CentralNotice is a maintenance warning or so, that is very useful to know. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r106223]: Revision status changed
Bsitu changed the status of MediaWiki.r106223 to new URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/106223 Old status: fixme New status: new Commit summary for MediaWiki.r106223: follow up -r 105969 - update feedback response email with latest copy ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Mass changes to bugs by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
Left him a note about this thread. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kozuch#Discussion_about_your_actions_in_Wikitech-l On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 1:04 PM, John Du Hart compwhi...@gmail.com wrote: Revert it. Just like enwiki, you can't do stuff like this without discussion. On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Jeremy Baron jer...@tuxmachine.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:38, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote: As long as it's there, people will think that we do. This mass change should have been discussed somewhere first, but then i never understood why voting is bad. Mozilla haven't disabled it in their Bugzilla and Google use it in Google code (as stars), although i don't whether either of them actually prioritize bugs according to it. I thought stars were the only way to subscribe to future updates? and hence they're not necessarily votes. CC list? But yes, we've just never used the voting--it's mainly just there as a favorites type list. -Chad ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- John -- John ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107610]: New comment added
Krinkle posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107610. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107610#c28689 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107610: [mediawiki.debug] highlight current pane and styling * wrapping bits in container and centering tabs * letting includes-pane use same markup and styling as queries * move appendTo action into common function (more DRY) Krinkle's comment: I see it. Looks like the proper behavior for tables. They auto-expand and are really stubborn when it comes to wrapping lines. Using codetable-layout: fixed;/code this will go away, but then we have to manually set the widths for column, browsers will then completely drop the auto-column devision. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107367]: New comment added
Amire80 posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107367. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107367#c28690 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107367: Workflow states logging. Amire80's comment: Addressed in r107642. Probably now it's functionally better, too. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107559]: New comment added, and revision status changed
Amire80 changed the status of MediaWiki.r107559 to new and commented it. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107559#c28691 Old Status: fixme New Status: new Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107559: Gender aliases for user and user talk pages. Amire80's comment: Addressed in r107645. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107645]: Revision status changed
Amire80 changed the status of MediaWiki.r107645 to fixme URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107645 Old status: new New status: fixme Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107645: Followup r107559. Added male aliases for User: to Russian and Hebrew. Requested by nikerabbit and reedy. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107559]: Revision status changed
Raymond changed the status of MediaWiki.r107559 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107559 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107559: Gender aliases for user and user talk pages. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107645]: Revision status changed
Raymond changed the status of MediaWiki.r107645 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107645 Old status: fixme New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107645: Followup r107559. Added male aliases for User: to Russian and Hebrew. Requested by nikerabbit and reedy. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107645]: New comment added
Amire80 posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107645. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107645#c28692 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107645: Followup r107559. Added male aliases for User: to Russian and Hebrew. Requested by nikerabbit and reedy. Amire80's comment: Russian is broken here, fixed in r107648. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107648]: Revision status changed
Raymond changed the status of MediaWiki.r107648 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107648 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107648: Follow up to r107645, corrected Russian. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r93720]: Revision status changed
Raindrift changed the status of MediaWiki.r93720 to resolved URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/93720 Old status: fixme New status: resolved Commit summary for MediaWiki.r93720: Extend upload api adding an option to upload files in chunks, using UploadStash to track the unfinished upload. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Mass changes to bugs by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:04:32 -0800, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote: a user Jan Kucera (Kozuch) (with email of garba...@seznam.cz) has been mass changing the priority of bugs based on a very crude vote count. this is very disruptive and counter productive issue. I would ask that one of our devs mass revert this please. Johh And here I thought this was just another run of bugspam vandalism to the tracker. -- ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name] ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107588]: New comment added
Robmoen posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107588. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107588#c28693 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107588: only show markashelpful for feedback response on the talk page of feedback owner Robmoen's comment: Trailing space on this line: pre+ 'mbfr_id' = intval( $item ) /pre ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Mass changes to bugs by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
If you vote for a bug then you are automatically added to the CC list and you it's a nice way to keep track of the bugs you are interested in using 'My Votes'. However, at first when I saw the votes system, I too believed that more votes = more quickly done. As this is not the case, removing votes might be a good way forward. Thehelpfulone On 30 Dec 2011, at 19:33, Daniel Friesen li...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote: On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:04:32 -0800, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote: a user Jan Kucera (Kozuch) (with email of garba...@seznam.cz) has been mass changing the priority of bugs based on a very crude vote count. this is very disruptive and counter productive issue. I would ask that one of our devs mass revert this please. Johh And here I thought this was just another run of bugspam vandalism to the tracker. -- ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name] ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[Wikitech-l] Instructions for setting up regression tests on local machine?
I have poked around a bit (using Google), but have not found instructions for setting up the MW regression test framework (e.g., CruiseControl or Jenkins or whatever is now being used + PHPUnit tests + Selenium tests) on a local machine (so new code can be regression tested before submitting patches to Bugzilla). Do such instructions exist and if so, would someone provide a pointer to them? Thanks, -- -- Dan Nessett ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[Wikitech-l] Small-ish gadget project: Bug update gadget
Hi all, in the new tradition of posting little gadget ideas and requests here: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gadget_kitchen/Requests#Automatic_updates_to_pages_with_bug_templates This would be helpful for pages which use bug templates like [[mw:Template:Tracked]] to inform users about the status of bugs they care about. If it's useful and efficient, we could promote it to default gadget or site script. Any takers? :) Cheers, Erik -- Erik Möller VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107305]: New comment added
Krinkle posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107305. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107305#c28694 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107305: Rework ext.translate.quickedit.js from global functions into mw.translate Numerous JS fixes, like getting rid of legacy globals Krinkle's comment: @Santhosh: Are you referring to the way a reference to codemw/code is established or the way the property is defined ? Using codevar mw = mediaWiki;/code is indeed not the way we do it per conventions (there's nothing wrong with it, pure stylistic convention to use the closure-callee to alias it). Using a local variable and exposing it at the end is fine, we do that a lot and is better for performance as well if you refer to the current object a lot. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Instructions for setting up regression tests on local machine?
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Dan Nessett dness...@yahoo.com wrote: I have poked around a bit (using Google), but have not found instructions for setting up the MW regression test framework (e.g., CruiseControl or Jenkins or whatever is now being used + PHPUnit tests + Selenium tests) on a local machine (so new code can be regression tested before submitting patches to Bugzilla). Do such instructions exist and if so, would someone provide a pointer to them? Jenkins is only really used to run the tests automatically when someone commits. You ran run the PHPUnit tests locally without Jenkins. Instructions on installing PHPUnit and running the tests is at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:PHP_unit_testing . I don't have URLs for you offhand, but QUnit and Selenium are probably also documented on mediawiki.org . Roan ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Instructions for setting up regression tests on local machine?
QUnit tests (for our JavaScript modules) can be ran by opening ./tests/qunit/index.html in your browser. Note that this is about to change in a few days, but check https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:JavaScript_unit_testing for the latest info. On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Dan Nessett dness...@yahoo.com wrote: I have poked around a bit (using Google), but have not found instructions for setting up the MW regression test framework (e.g., CruiseControl or Jenkins or whatever is now being used + PHPUnit tests + Selenium tests) on a local machine (so new code can be regression tested before submitting patches to Bugzilla). Do such instructions exist and if so, would someone provide a pointer to them? Jenkins is only really used to run the tests automatically when someone commits. You ran run the PHPUnit tests locally without Jenkins. Instructions on installing PHPUnit and running the tests is at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:PHP_unit_testing . I don't have URLs for you offhand, but QUnit and Selenium are probably also documented on mediawiki.org . Roan ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r55905]: New comment added
Krinkle posted a comment on MediaWiki.r55905. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/55905#c28695 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r55905: Refactor redundant attrib dropping into new method This saves code in a few places on the caller's side, and will reduce the size of output HTML more consistently. Krinkle's comment: (message from the future: bug 33274) ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Mass changes to bugs by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 18:03, Thehelpfulone Wikipedia thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com wrote: If you vote for a bug then you are automatically added to the CC list and you it's a nice way to keep track of the bugs you are interested in using 'My Votes'. However, at first when I saw the votes system, I too believed that more votes = more quickly done. As this is not the case, removing votes might be a good way forward. Actually, when we vote for a bug we are not added to its CC list (which would cause an email to be sent to everyone already on that list), but we get followup messages anyway. This way, the votes can also be used for silently watching some bugs without bothering others with emails which just say we were added to the CC list... ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Mass changes to bugs by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
Why don't we just change the text vote to follow or watch? On 12/30/11 12:51 PM, Helder wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 18:03, Thehelpfulone Wikipedia thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com wrote: If you vote for a bug then you are automatically added to the CC list and you it's a nice way to keep track of the bugs you are interested in using 'My Votes'. However, at first when I saw the votes system, I too believed that more votes = more quickly done. As this is not the case, removing votes might be a good way forward. Actually, when we vote for a bug we are not added to its CC list (which would cause an email to be sent to everyone already on that list), but we get followup messages anyway. This way, the votes can also be used for silently watching some bugs without bothering others with emails which just say we were added to the CC list... ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- Brandon Harris, Senior Designer, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107563]: Revision status changed
Amire80 changed the status of MediaWiki.r107563 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107563 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107563: Change the 'Disable input method' preference to 'Enable input method'. Simplify some interface messages. i18n card #362 ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Mass changes to bugs by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Helder helder.w...@gmail.com wrote: Actually, when we vote for a bug we are not added to its CC list (which would cause an email to be sent to everyone already on that list), but we get followup messages anyway. This way, the votes can also be used for silently watching some bugs without bothering others with emails which just say we were added to the CC list... Did you know you can disable notifications for cc list changes? In fact, we should probably make that the default. -Chad ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugzilla: Minor enhancements should not be tagged highest priority.
Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com writes: - Original Message - From: Dan Collins en.wp.s...@gmail.com On Bugzilla, bugs which are minor enhancements should not be tagged highest priority unless the priority is truly highest. This should certainly not be done en masse without personally reviewing the bug itself. Technological fact is not subject to democracy. On my Bugzilla installations, the Severity is owned by the reporter, but the Priority by the assignee; this seems the best approach to me... I agree. This is how I have been handling it. I leave Severity alone. Priority defaults to unprioritized. I make a first pass at prioritization with most things going into Normal. I think we have a pretty good handle on things in the Highest priority, but with recent activity and the limited prioritization I've done while on my break, there are too many things in Highest now. I will cull the list on Tuesday, but if anyone wants to take a shot now, be my guest. (Still to discuss: How do I/we handle High priority bugs?) Mark ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107653]: New comment added, and revision status changed
Raymond changed the status of MediaWiki.r107653 to fixme and commented it. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107653#c28696 Old Status: new New Status: fixme Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107653: * Inverted the precedence between section edition and revision undoing, now undo and undoafter will be ignored if the section (or even wpSection) is provided to be consistent the remaining of the interface * Modified EditPage::getContent() to load the original content only when really needed * Don't put the 'missing-article' in the textbox when a non-existing revision is provided, instead display it above the form * Always diff to the current version when showing a conflict or a spam filter match * Factorised code to get the current text on edit conflict * Compare the correct text in EditPage::internalAttemptSave() * Some little coding style fixes Raymond's comment: PHP Notice: Undefined variable: section in /www/w/includes/EditPage.php on line 703 ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107653]: New comment added, and revision status changed
IAlex changed the status of MediaWiki.r107653 to new and commented it. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107653#c28697 Old Status: fixme New Status: new Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107653: * Inverted the precedence between section edition and revision undoing, now undo and undoafter will be ignored if the section (or even wpSection) is provided to be consistent the remaining of the interface * Modified EditPage::getContent() to load the original content only when really needed * Don't put the 'missing-article' in the textbox when a non-existing revision is provided, instead display it above the form * Always diff to the current version when showing a conflict or a spam filter match * Factorised code to get the current text on edit conflict * Compare the correct text in EditPage::internalAttemptSave() * Some little coding style fixes IAlex's comment: Fixed in r107658. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107656]: New comment added
Krinkle posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107656. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107656#c28698 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107656: * Style fixes in EditPage::showEditForm() to more readable * Use style=display:none; instead of non-existing type=hidden for the textarea when asking user for confirmation to save the edit if the page was deleted during edition; also drop other attributes since they are useless in that case Krinkle's comment: FYI, since bug 30719 is fixed, attributes like class may be an array when using codeHtml::element/code (which EditPage::showTextbox does) ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r99732]: New comment added, and revision status changed
Robmoen changed the status of MediaWiki.r99732 to ok and commented it. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/99732#c28699 Old Status: new New Status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r99732: switching from GPL to MIT license per http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Thread:Extension_talk:WikiLove/Reusing_the_default_WikiLove.js, Jan Paul agrees with switch Robmoen's comment: lol ^ ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107464]: New comment added
NeilK posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107464. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107464#c28700 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107464: remove need to add newline at end of input NeilK's comment: fixed in r107464 ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107654]: Revision status changed
Reedy changed the status of MediaWiki.r107654 to reverted URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107654 Old status: new New status: reverted Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107654: Bump to 0.60 from https://raw.github.com/themattharris/tmhOAuth/master/tmhOAuth.php ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107638]: Revision status changed
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r107638 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107638 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107638: followup to -r107617 - code style and consistency change ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Mass changes to bugs by Jan Kucera (Kozuch)
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:14:08 -0800, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Helder helder.w...@gmail.com wrote: Actually, when we vote for a bug we are not added to its CC list (which would cause an email to be sent to everyone already on that list), but we get followup messages anyway. This way, the votes can also be used for silently watching some bugs without bothering others with emails which just say we were added to the CC list... Did you know you can disable notifications for cc list changes? In fact, we should probably make that the default. -Chad Long as we still get one when our friendly local vandal decides to remove us from the Cc list so we can add ourselves back. -- ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name] ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107662]: Revision status changed
Krinkle changed the status of MediaWiki.r107662 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107662 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107662: Just requiring Maintenance.php isn't going to help when it's subclassing BatchAntiSpoof ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r82273]: Revision status changed
Reedy changed the status of MediaWiki.r82273 to resolved URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/82273 Old status: new New status: resolved Commit summary for MediaWiki.r82273: Moved Skin::makeGlobalVariablesScript() to OutputPage::getJSVars() * merged script and if ( window.mediaWiki ) block with the one of mediaWiki.loader as stated in the doc * removed dependency of $wgTitle * the two only calls to this functions are in SemanticForms, but will not affect current version of MediaWiki: ** specials/SF_UploadWindow.php: this file is only used before 1.16 ** specials/SF_UploadWindow2.php: the call is part of the else branch of a method_exists( $wgOut, 'addModules' ) check, which means it's not called since 1.17 ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107640]: Revision status changed
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r107640 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107640 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107640: [mediawiki.debug] attempt at fixing off-screen mega wide cells for some queries. * See also r107610 CR ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107641]: Revision status changed
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r107641 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107641 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107641: [UploadWizard] Uncaught ReferenceError: wgSiteName is not defined ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107643]: Revision status changed
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r107643 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107643 Old status: deferred New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107643: Removing file - no longer needed, now that SF requires MW 1.16 ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107644]: Revision status changed
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r107644 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107644 Old status: deferred New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107644: SF_UploadWindow2.php renamed to SF_UploadWindow.php, now that old class (which provided compatibility for MW 1.16) is no longer needed ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107645]: Revision status changed
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r107645 to resolved URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107645 Old status: ok New status: resolved Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107645: Followup r107559. Added male aliases for User: to Russian and Hebrew. Requested by nikerabbit and reedy. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107647]: Revision status changed
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r107647 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107647 Old status: deferred New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107647: There is only one class for now upload window - SFUploadWindow ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107651]: Revision status changed
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r107651 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107651 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107651: [UploadWizard] Uncaught ReferenceError: UploadWizardConfig is not defined ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107669]: New comment added
Krinkle posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107669. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107669#c28701 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107669: * more specific selectors for wikitable - don't inherit properties to nested tables which causes various rendering issues ** (bug 30485) Hieroglyphs look scary if embedded in tables with class=wikitable ** (bug 33434) math extension: integral expressions display with boxes/frames/borders Krinkle's comment: Did you test this ? Last I checked browsers insert (if not already) a TBODY element in between there ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r95340]: Revision status changed
Danny B. changed the status of MediaWiki.r95340 to reverted URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/95340 Old status: ok New status: reverted Commit summary for MediaWiki.r95340: * (bug 30485) Fixed interference between wikihiero extension and 'wikitable' class style Border padding settings from the .wikitable class were overriding the rules for .mw-hiero-table and .mw-hiero-table td. Added !important on them to make sure that those inner styles consistently override whatever generic table cell rules might be in play that have the same or greater specificity. Long-term of course it might be nice to rewrite the whole thing to compose SVG and output that. :) ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r106752]: New comment added, and revision status changed
GrafZahl changed the status of MediaWiki.r106752 to fixme and commented it.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/106752#c28702
Old Status: new
New Status: fixme
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r106752:
Merged FileBackend branch. Manually avoiding merging the many prop-only changes
SVN likes to sprinkle in (easy to spot from the change list). Did not add
SwiftFileBackend.php as it still is in development.
GrafZahl's comment:
Breaks a maintenance script:
pre
$ php maintenance/rebuildImages.php --missing
PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined method LocalRepo::enumFilesInFS() in
maintenance/rebuildImages.php on line 168
PHP Stack trace:
PHP 1. {main}() maintenance/rebuildImages.php:0
PHP 2. require_once() maintenance/rebuildImages.php:225
PHP 3. ImageBuilder-execute() maintenance/doMaintenance.php:105
PHP 4. ImageBuilder-crawlMissing() maintenance/rebuildImages.php:64
/pre
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r103202]: New comment added, and revision status changed
GrafZahl changed the status of MediaWiki.r103202 to fixme and commented it. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/103202#c28703 Old Status: ok New Status: fixme Commit summary for MediaWiki.r103202: * Factorise common code in ImagePage::delete() and allow normal page deletion if $wgUploadMaintenance is true * Moved $wgUploadMaintenance check after permissions and read only, so that the user doesn't think the error is temporary if he both doesn't have the permission and $wgUploadMaintenance is true * Show normal error page when $wgUploadMaintenance and added a message for the error title * Moved watchlist updating to FileDeletForm::execute(), it has nothing to do in doDelete() (would also be executed for api requests, etc.) * Added $user parameter to FileDeletForm::doDelete() to pass the user doing the action * Use WikiPage instead of Article GrafZahl's comment: Undefined variable title, when trying to delete a file and changing the watched status. Did you mean code$this-title/code in lines 104 and 106? ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107657]: Revision status changed
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r107657 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107657 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107657: fix tablesorter unit test in ie7. Add semicolon to end of statement in tablesorter class ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107669]: New comment added
Danny B. posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107669. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107669#c28704 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107669: * more specific selectors for wikitable - don't inherit properties to nested tables which causes various rendering issues ** (bug 30485) Hieroglyphs look scary if embedded in tables with class=wikitable ** (bug 33434) math extension: integral expressions display with boxes/frames/borders Danny B.'s comment: Added complementary rules in r107673. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107669]: New comment added
Danny B. posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107669. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107669#c28707 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107669: * more specific selectors for wikitable - don't inherit properties to nested tables which causes various rendering issues ** (bug 30485) Hieroglyphs look scary if embedded in tables with class=wikitable ** (bug 33434) math extension: integral expressions display with boxes/frames/borders Danny B.'s comment: Having both is being surely compatible with all browsers supporting code/code selector thus staying on the safe side. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r106926]: New comment added
NeilK posted a comment on MediaWiki.r106926. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/106926#c28708 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r106926: mw.language.parser - mw.jqueryMsg NeilK's comment: Important: Revert this change on commons, once deployed http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.cssdiff=64610434oldid=64572893 ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r106926]: New comment added
NeilK posted a comment on MediaWiki.r106926. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/106926#c28709 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r106926: mw.language.parser - mw.jqueryMsg NeilK's comment: Added scaptrap to this change, not because it requires a config fix, because of the above CSS fix needed after push. If there's a better tag for this I don't know it ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107613]: New comment added
Reedy posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107613. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107613#c28710 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107613: Kill trailing ?, especially if we're arbitarily including them Reedy's comment: This is also being upstreamed too, yaaay ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r106926]: New comment added
NeilK posted a comment on MediaWiki.r106926. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/106926#c28711 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r106926: mw.language.parser - mw.jqueryMsg NeilK's comment: And, this message should be changed in MediaWiki: space. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Mwe-upwiz-license-custom ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107669]: New comment added
Krinkle posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107669. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107669#c28712 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107669: * more specific selectors for wikitable - don't inherit properties to nested tables which causes various rendering issues ** (bug 30485) Hieroglyphs look scary if embedded in tables with class=wikitable ** (bug 33434) math extension: integral expressions display with boxes/frames/borders Krinkle's comment: I tested with only the code..table tbody tr ../code version in browserstack and works successfully in Chrome, Firefox 3.6+, IE7+ and Opera 10.5+ (maybe earlier version of Opera too but don't have an older version). This version does not work in IE6, but does the current version in SVN with both also does not work in IE6 (it does not support the code/code child selector and skips this selector entirely). According to the W3 specification user agents must and do wrap tables in tbody if no table containers are specified in the document (thead, tbody, tfoot). So we're safe there. However, as you mentioned on IRC, this is only true in HTML mode. MediaWiki is in HTML5 by default, but wikis can be put it in XHTML1 mode, and in that mode, according to the specification, user agents must not do these kind of changes. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107673]: New comment added, and revision status changed
Krinkle changed the status of MediaWiki.r107673 to ok and commented it. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107673#c28706 Old Status: new New Status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107673: + complementary tbody involved rules in wikitable definitions for browsers which add tbody not only virtually (follow-up to r107669) Krinkle's comment: Thx, now it works in Chrome too. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Small-ish gadget project: Bug update gadget
I started making this but then I realized I was going to have issues making the needed cross-domain post requests. I found BugTender achieved this by routing requests through it's own proxy.php script. Here is what I have so far: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Robmoen/bugStatusUpdate.js Any thoughts for a work around ? ~Rob On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote: Hi all, in the new tradition of posting little gadget ideas and requests here: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gadget_kitchen/Requests#Automatic_updates_to_pages_with_bug_templates This would be helpful for pages which use bug templates like [[mw:Template:Tracked]] to inform users about the status of bugs they care about. If it's useful and efficient, we could promote it to default gadget or site script. Any takers? :) Cheers, Erik -- Erik Möller VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107669]: New comment added
Krinkle posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107669. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107669#c28705 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107669: * more specific selectors for wikitable - don't inherit properties to nested tables which causes various rendering issues ** (bug 30485) Hieroglyphs look scary if embedded in tables with class=wikitable ** (bug 33434) math extension: integral expressions display with boxes/frames/borders Krinkle's comment: Nice :) Perhaps we can try with only the code..table tbody tr ../code version, that one should work in firefox too. Apparently Firefox has some special thingy that allows styles for code..table tr../code to work also. (by the way for more info, see [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5568859/why-doesnt-table-tr-td-with-child-selectors-work here]) ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Small-ish gadget project: Bug update gadget
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Rob Moen rm...@wikimedia.org wrote: I started making this but then I realized I was going to have issues making the needed cross-domain post requests. I found BugTender achieved this by routing requests through it's own proxy.php script. Here is what I have so far: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Robmoen/bugStatusUpdate.js Got it to work using JSONP GET requests. Leaving a note on your talk page with more details. -- Erik Möller VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107710]: New comment added
Johnduhart posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107710. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107710#c28714 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107710: Comitting new extension, ServerAdminLog. Meant as a replacement for the [[wikitech:Server Admin Log]] and SAL in labsconsole. Still an early work in progress. Johnduhart's comment: [[wikitech:Server Admin Log]] ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107710]: New comment added
Johnduhart posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107710. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107710#c28715 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107710: Comitting new extension, ServerAdminLog. Meant as a replacement for the [[wikitech:Server Admin Log]] and SAL in labsconsole. Still an early work in progress. Johnduhart's comment: [[wikitech:Server admin log]] ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
