RE: [WISPA] Anyone in the NJ area that knows Canopy ?
For ? Going to Moto ? Beginning to believe that... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 8:04 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone in the NJ area that knows Canopy ? Serve's ya right! :-P -B- Rick Smith wrote: Wanna have lunch ? I'll take ya on a tour of my network. I'd like to have someone else come take a look at the stuff I'm pullin my hair out on with Canopy. All I get from Tech Support is We don't support NLOS at 8 miles WELLL... I can SEE the tower... I've got 99% LOS No connection... For these lists, A little history: I've got a tower in northern NJ, canopy AP / omni installed at top, 200'. Nothing obstructing. Running on 918mhz. Veritcal omni from pac wireless - od9-11. Pretty clear survey (very little noise) At 8 miles out, is my father's house, and a tower we're renting space on soon. (Big ole ATT monster). I cannot, for the LIFE of me, get a successful connection to either of those places, with a canopy SM and 15dbi yagi. Very little noise at the SM end, as well. I've been around and around with canopy techs, and all they keep claiming is Oh, this is near / non line of sight ? Forget it. We're not allowed to waste our time on that because it's not supported I've been a long time Trango user, and a connection like this in Trango experience is a SLAM dunk.When saying that to canopy techs, I get we're not allowed to comment on third party gear and I reply I'm not asking you to, I'm asking you to explain why CANOPY gear sucks this bad! hehe. Is trango just that much better at dealing with fresnel incursion, or trees, or whatever ? When canopy techs are asked why I can't get a connection at 8 miles through 2 saplings, they say because NLOS situations are test and see situations. Some will work and some won't. OK, I can see that... But which WILL if these don't? Anyhow, just wonderin if there's someone with canopy experience in my area that I could buy lunch / dinner... R -- Bob Moldashel Lakeland Communications, Inc. Broadband Deployment Group 1350 Lincoln Avenue Holbrook, New York 11741 USA 800-479-9195 Toll Free US Canada 631-585-5558 Fax 516-551-1131 Cell -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/207 - Release Date: 12/19/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/207 - Release Date: 12/19/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Anyone in the NJ area that knows Canopy ?
That should be working. I know of several people doing this without a hitch on 900. You definately have an issue (unless you have a different deffinition of sapling than I have! :-) I assume you already swapped subscribers??? Rick Smith wrote: For ? Going to Moto ? Beginning to believe that... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 8:04 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone in the NJ area that knows Canopy ? Serve's ya right! :-P -B- Rick Smith wrote: Wanna have lunch ? I'll take ya on a tour of my network. I'd like to have someone else come take a look at the stuff I'm pullin my hair out on with Canopy. All I get from Tech Support is We don't support NLOS at 8 miles WELLL... I can SEE the tower... I've got 99% LOS No connection... For these lists, A little history: I've got a tower in northern NJ, canopy AP / omni installed at top, 200'. Nothing obstructing. Running on 918mhz. Veritcal omni from pac wireless - od9-11. Pretty clear survey (very little noise) At 8 miles out, is my father's house, and a tower we're renting space on soon. (Big ole ATT monster). I cannot, for the LIFE of me, get a successful connection to either of those places, with a canopy SM and 15dbi yagi. Very little noise at the SM end, as well. I've been around and around with canopy techs, and all they keep claiming is Oh, this is near / non line of sight ? Forget it. We're not allowed to waste our time on that because it's not supported I've been a long time Trango user, and a connection like this in Trango experience is a SLAM dunk.When saying that to canopy techs, I get we're not allowed to comment on third party gear and I reply I'm not asking you to, I'm asking you to explain why CANOPY gear sucks this bad! hehe. Is trango just that much better at dealing with fresnel incursion, or trees, or whatever ? When canopy techs are asked why I can't get a connection at 8 miles through 2 saplings, they say because NLOS situations are test and see situations. Some will work and some won't. OK, I can see that... But which WILL if these don't? Anyhow, just wonderin if there's someone with canopy experience in my area that I could buy lunch / dinner... R -- Bob Moldashel Lakeland Communications, Inc. Broadband Deployment Group 1350 Lincoln Avenue Holbrook, New York 11741 USA 800-479-9195 Toll Free US Canada 631-585-5558 Fax 516-551-1131 Cell -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/207 - Release Date: 12/19/2005 -- Bob Moldashel Lakeland Communications, Inc. Broadband Deployment Group 1350 Lincoln Avenue Holbrook, New York 11741 USA 800-479-9195 Toll Free US Canada 631-585-5558 Fax 516-551-1131 Cell -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] DS3 to Ethernet Converters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://stores.ebay.com/G4-Communications Just remember, beware of power issues. For instance, the ones listed by the above vendor want 48V telecom power, not standard 120VAC. I dunno about the rest of you folks, but I don't have telecom wiring at, well, any of my towers. And those 48V power rectifiers are a touch expensive (the above vender lists 'em at $500 each). Oh, and BIG, big enough that they wouldn't even fit in the outdoor enclosures I use. David Smith MVN.net -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] DS3 to Ethernet Converters
You don't need rectifiers. Just buy a 48 vdc brick supply. there are tons of manufacturers making these. less than $75. -B- David E. Smith wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://stores.ebay.com/G4-Communications Just remember, beware of power issues. For instance, the ones listed by the above vendor want 48V telecom power, not standard 120VAC. I dunno about the rest of you folks, but I don't have telecom wiring at, well, any of my towers. And those 48V power rectifiers are a touch expensive (the above vender lists 'em at $500 each). Oh, and BIG, big enough that they wouldn't even fit in the outdoor enclosures I use. David Smith MVN.net -- Bob Moldashel Lakeland Communications, Inc. Broadband Deployment Group 1350 Lincoln Avenue Holbrook, New York 11741 USA 800-479-9195 Toll Free US Canada 631-585-5558 Fax 516-551-1131 Cell -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] DS3 to Ethernet Converters
http://www.paradyne.com/products/DNE4500/ I've used their sdsl kids since '98 and the t-1 extenders (no router needed) since 2001 or so. Maybe 2002. They are the original Net to Net products. Good stuff. If anyone needs them I have two t-1 kits I'm no longer using. Won't go cheap cause I don't mind keeping them for future stuff but. laters, Marlon (509) 982-2181 Equipment sales (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services 42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp! 64.146.146.12 (net meeting) www.odessaoffice.com/wireless www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam - Original Message - From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 6:14 PM Subject: [WISPA] DS3 to Ethernet Converters I just ordered 2 of those PCOM links. I will report how they do for us. I need some DS3 to Ethernet Converters. What is my best source on these? Thanks, Scriv -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Fw: [TVWHITESPACE] Noteworthy FCC PN and filing deadline
From another list a few of the board members are on. Can someone take a look at this and see if they can come up with a filing? I can help but don't have time to do the whole thing. I can probably also put you in touch with people that can help you with details/understanding of the issues. laters, Marlon (509) 982-2181 Equipment sales (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services 42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp! 64.146.146.12 (net meeting) www.odessaoffice.com/wireless www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam - Original Message - From: Michael Marcus To: Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 8:41 AM Subject: [TVWHITESPACE] Noteworthy FCC PN and filing deadline If you check the FCC OET website, there is a sleeper there that may have a big impact on the whitespace proceeding: 12/16/05 Office of Engineering and Techology seeks comment on a Petition for Waiver of Part 74 of the Rules, filed by Nuclear Energy Institute and United Telcom Council. PN: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3216A1.pdf Petition: http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdfid_document=6518190717 Just in time for the holidays my former colleagues released this PN, perhaps hoping this group would miss it. Comment Date: January 17, 2006 Reply Comment Date: January 30, 2006 The PN responds to an 7/20/05 petition from the nuclear power trade association, NEI, and the better known UTC asking for permission to use Part 74 wireless 2 way systems in nuclear power plants. Reading between the lines, one gets the impression that, like many of the wireless mikes, these systems have been used illegally for a while and they are now trying to legalize their de facto use. The petition states on p. 14 (p. 18 of the Acrobat document) Accordingly, Petitioners contend that, today, there is no viable alternative equipment that would provide the requisite performance features necessary to assist in complying with the NRC’s ALARA mandate. There is no discussion of why readily available Part 90 equipment can not be used for this function. Since what they are seeking if hands free wireless connectivity, it would appear that many Part 90 systems would meet their need and that Part 90 licensing should be easy in the needed locations. I suspect the part 74 equipment is being used because it is cheaper or perhaps more readily available. So why is this important? The FCC has a habit of giving UHF TV spectrum use to special interests without ever looking at the issues in 04-186. 3 years ago there was a sweetheart deal to give Hollywood interests special UHF TV spectrum access. See Section 74.870 if you missed it. After a few more of such giveaways, there will either be no whitespace or it will be pockmarked with high priority special interests that should have been accomodated in Part 90. I urge the TVWhitespace community to meet the January 17 filing date and tell the FCC that the petitioner has failed to justify why other alternatives are not available. Alternatively, any access to TV spectrum should be limited to channels 14-20 - already encumbered by public safety sharing. You may also wish to point out to FCC how the granting of this petition would complicate 04-186 proposals when there are other alternatives available for the petitioner. Best wishes to all for a happy holiday! Mike Marcus www.marcus-spectrum.com -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
With the 12K you can put 2 38 ghz links and have lots of spare change Gino A. Villarini, Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.aeronetpr.com 787.767.7466 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:34 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul? Agreed, but if you can do it for 2 grand why spend 12? If the ebay radios are reliable, then skip the fiber in my opinion. Might as well take the 10 grand that is left over and install another 25 subs. ;) George wrote: I do not believe you laying fiber is at all a bad sign to your customers. You have been on the cutting edge of technology with wireless, why would you not do the fiber to continue on with your cutting edge technology deployment. It almost sounds like you believe wireless is better than fiber, but we all know fiber/wireless is the end game. If you are fiber and wireless, you are the cutting edge leader. My opinion. George John Scrivner wrote: I need some feedback from the collective. I am looking for a backhaul radio link for my main tower. 5.8 Ghz is fully utilized at this location. It is only a 1500 foot shot. I would like at least 50 meg full or 100 meg half duplex. I would like this solution to be under $8K or so. 5.3 Ghz is pretty open here. Does a solution exist? I can lay fiber for about $12K or so. I am considering doing that but I think laying fiber for my main connection when I am a fixed broadband wireless provider sends the wrong message to my potential customers when Charter is going all over town selling fiber connections. I welcome your feedback. Scriv -- Brian Rohrbacher Reliable Internet, LLC www.reliableinter.net Cell 269-838-8338 Caught up in the Air 1 Thess. 4:17 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Anyone in the NJ area that knows Canopy ?
Now there's a coupla good points...thanks Rich... Swapping out the AP or Omni would be costly, so that's a last resort unfortunately. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rcomroe Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 10:28 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone in the NJ area that knows Canopy ? Your problem could well be multipath. Canopy can be picky in that even with good signal if either end is suffering a high reflectivity environment (multiple paths entering the antenna) you can forget it ... no link. Your problem might be that that you're using an omni on your AP. An omni has no rejection of reflected signals coming in from other directions. You say its 200 ft up, but are there tall buildings around? The path between the SM and AP might be clear, but if there's a reflective object behind thte AP or to one side it could cause no link because the Canopy AP is on an omni. Canopy can only use an omni in a reflectivity free environment. This is pretty much a Canopy specific limitation. Canopy's designed for directive antennas on both sides to shield out reflections. Use of an omni is limited to only suitable environments. On the SM side, it could be a strong ground reflection. While you're obviously pointing your SM yagi directly back at the AP, have you tried tilting it up vertically (point above the AP, not directly at it). If you get linked by pointing the SM above the AP you might be fighting a strong ground reflection near the SM. If you're fighting signal quality degradation from a couple trees on the SM side, try moving around. Rich - Original Message - From: Rick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 7:28 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] Anyone in the NJ area that knows Canopy ? Oh yeah... Been through 4 SM's and even an AP that I converted to a SM... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 8:18 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone in the NJ area that knows Canopy ? That should be working. I know of several people doing this without a hitch on 900. You definately have an issue (unless you have a different deffinition of sapling than I have! :-) I assume you already swapped subscribers??? Rick Smith wrote: For ? Going to Moto ? Beginning to believe that... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 8:04 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone in the NJ area that knows Canopy ? Serve's ya right! :-P -B- Rick Smith wrote: Wanna have lunch ? I'll take ya on a tour of my network. I'd like to have someone else come take a look at the stuff I'm pullin my hair out on with Canopy. All I get from Tech Support is We don't support NLOS at 8 miles WELLL... I can SEE the tower... I've got 99% LOS No connection... For these lists, A little history: I've got a tower in northern NJ, canopy AP / omni installed at top, 200'. Nothing obstructing. Running on 918mhz. Veritcal omni from pac wireless - od9-11. Pretty clear survey (very little noise) At 8 miles out, is my father's house, and a tower we're renting space on soon. (Big ole ATT monster). I cannot, for the LIFE of me, get a successful connection to either of those places, with a canopy SM and 15dbi yagi. Very little noise at the SM end, as well. I've been around and around with canopy techs, and all they keep claiming is Oh, this is near / non line of sight ? Forget it. We're not allowed to waste our time on that because it's not supported I've been a long time Trango user, and a connection like this in Trango experience is a SLAM dunk.When saying that to canopy techs, I get we're not allowed to comment on third party gear and I reply I'm not asking you to, I'm asking you to explain why CANOPY gear sucks this bad! hehe. Is trango just that much better at dealing with fresnel incursion, or trees, or whatever ? When canopy techs are asked why I can't get a connection at 8 miles through 2 saplings, they say because NLOS situations are test and see situations. Some will work and some won't. OK, I can see that... But which WILL if these don't? Anyhow, just wonderin if there's someone with canopy experience in my area that I could buy lunch / dinner... R -- Bob Moldashel Lakeland Communications, Inc. Broadband Deployment Group 1350 Lincoln Avenue Holbrook, New York 11741 USA 800-479-9195 Toll Free US Canada 631-585-5558 Fax 516-551-1131 Cell -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul?
Money wise you may be right, not sure of the entire situation that john is involved with. But the focus today is on fiber. And how the community you serve perceives your company is very important. We talked about fiber in 2001 and today people still ask us when the fiber is going to be deployed. Lately our City has been doing telecommunications studies and fiber is the key word. Everyone who studies the future of broadband and connectivity comes to the conclusion that fiber is the technology that has the most potential in terms of potential to keep up with and surpass any thing that comes down the pike. When everyone was copper a lot of us isps were pioneering wireless, now that wireless is the hot topic, we need to keep our minds open on what is available to deploy and fiber is the other option. In Johns case, which is similar to mine, Charter is rolling out fiber builds. They are leap frogging ahead. Charter and Telco is our competition and we have to consider our future when considering what we deploy today and what our long term investments are. I believe our initial fiber deployment is the biggest hurdle. I myself am working towards a fiber build out to jump ahead of what is coming down the pike. I am not saying the end of wireless is in sight, I am saying we need to mature our networks to what the future demands will require. My opinions. George Brian Rohrbacher wrote: Agreed, but if you can do it for 2 grand why spend 12? If the ebay radios are reliable, then skip the fiber in my opinion. Might as well take the 10 grand that is left over and install another 25 subs. ;) George wrote: I do not believe you laying fiber is at all a bad sign to your customers. You have been on the cutting edge of technology with wireless, why would you not do the fiber to continue on with your cutting edge technology deployment. It almost sounds like you believe wireless is better than fiber, but we all know fiber/wireless is the end game. If you are fiber and wireless, you are the cutting edge leader. My opinion. George John Scrivner wrote: I need some feedback from the collective. I am looking for a backhaul radio link for my main tower. 5.8 Ghz is fully utilized at this location. It is only a 1500 foot shot. I would like at least 50 meg full or 100 meg half duplex. I would like this solution to be under $8K or so. 5.3 Ghz is pretty open here. Does a solution exist? I can lay fiber for about $12K or so. I am considering doing that but I think laying fiber for my main connection when I am a fixed broadband wireless provider sends the wrong message to my potential customers when Charter is going all over town selling fiber connections. I welcome your feedback. Scriv -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Fw: [TVWHITESPACE] Noteworthy FCC PN and filing deadline
I don't see the big issue with this. Inline Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote: From another list a few of the board members are on. Can someone take a look at this and see if they can come up with a filing? I can help but don't have time to do the whole thing. I can probably also put you in touch with people that can help you with details/understanding of the issues. laters, Marlon (509) 982-2181 Equipment sales (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services 42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp! 64.146.146.12 (net meeting) www.odessaoffice.com/wireless www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam - Original Message - From: Michael Marcus To: Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 8:41 AM Subject: [TVWHITESPACE] Noteworthy FCC PN and filing deadline If you check the FCC OET website, there is a sleeper there that may have a big impact on the whitespace proceeding: I don't see this sleeper. 12/16/05 Office of Engineering and Techology seeks comment on a Petition for Waiver of Part 74 of the Rules, filed by Nuclear Energy Institute and United Telcom Council. PN: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3216A1.pdf Petition: http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdfid_document=6518190717 Just in time for the holidays my former colleagues released this PN, perhaps hoping this group would miss it. Comment Date: January 17, 2006 Reply Comment Date: January 30, 2006 The PN responds to an 7/20/05 petition from the nuclear power trade association, NEI, and the better known UTC asking for permission to use Part 74 wireless 2 way systems in nuclear power plants. Reading between the lines, one gets the impression that, like many of the wireless mikes, these systems have been used illegally for a while and they are now trying to legalize their de facto use. They have not been used illegally.. They were granted experimental special temporary authorizations (STA's) similar to the ones the Commission is granting for 3650 MHz.. The petition states on p. 14 (p. 18 of the Acrobat document) Accordingly, Petitioners contend that, today, there is no viable alternative equipment that would provide the requisite performance features necessary to assist in complying with the NRC’s ALARA mandate. There is no discussion of why readily available Part 90 equipment can not be used for this function. I disagreethey explicitly state they need handsfree, full duplex communications. There are no portable Part 90 devices that will do that. Since what they are seeking if hands free wireless connectivity, it would appear that many Part 90 systems would meet their need and that Part 90 licensing should be easy in the needed locations. I suspect the part 74 equipment is being used because it is cheaper or perhaps more readily available. Well...The Telex stuff is not cheaper that's for sure. And hands free equipment uses VOX (voice activated transmit) technology which has a habit of cutting off the first or several words of a transmission. The Telex system transmits from the time it is turned on. It transmits on one channel and simultaneously receives on the other. Because it is transmitting all the time there is no dropping' of words. So why is this important? The FCC has a habit of giving UHF TV spectrum use to special interests without ever looking at the issues in 04-186. 3 years ago there was a sweetheart deal to give Hollywood interests special UHF TV spectrum access. See Section 74.870 if you missed it. I don't see an issue here with this After a few more of such giveaways, there will either be no whitespace or it will be pockmarked with high priority special interests that should have been accomodated in Part 90. No more whitespace?? I don't think so. How many nuclear power facilities are there in the US? 104??? OK...How many of them are going to be an issue with 50 mw of tx power?? I think its a moot point I urge the TVWhitespace community to meet the January 17 filing date and tell the FCC that the petitioner has failed to justify why other alternatives are not available. Alternatively, any access to TV spectrum should be limited to channels 14-20 - already encumbered by public safety sharing. WellTwo things 1. I don't agree that they have not justified their reason for the waiver. I also believe that they have justified that there are no other alternatives available. 2. I do agree that it may be a possible requirement to limit them to the present Public Safety hold backs that are presently in place. You may also wish to point out to FCC how the granting of this petition would complicate 04-186 proposals when there are other alternatives available for the petitioner. I don't feel this will muddy the water. Again, the use of 50 mw radios
Re: [WISPA] 48 volt power supplies
Try http://www.wisp-router.com/index.php?cPath=38osCsid=35487c8a3c68aaca1f13a9fe560a0c26 Blair John Scrivner wrote: Can anyone hook me up with a source for the 48 volt supplies? I need to buy some of those DS3 to Ethernet converters and they require that supply. I have never seen them before and need a source. Also, does anyone have a manual and/or drawings of the PCOM radios we are buying? I need to start reading up on these radios to make sure I know what all I need to get them installed. Please help if you have a source of information on them. If any of you have experience with the PCOMs and DS3 to Ethernet converters I would like to pick your brain on a few things. Many thanks, Scriv -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 48 volt power supplies
http://www.jameco.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/StoreCatalogDisplay?storeId=10001catalogId=10001langId=-1 These guys carry a lot of stuff. I've ordered from them. All the items showed up. Blair Davis wrote: Try http://www.wisp-router.com/index.php?cPath=38osCsid=35487c8a3c68aaca1f13a9fe560a0c26 Blair John Scrivner wrote: Can anyone hook me up with a source for the 48 volt supplies? I need to buy some of those DS3 to Ethernet converters and they require that supply. I have never seen them before and need a source. Also, does anyone have a manual and/or drawings of the PCOM radios we are buying? I need to start reading up on these radios to make sure I know what all I need to get them installed. Please help if you have a source of information on them. If any of you have experience with the PCOMs and DS3 to Ethernet converters I would like to pick your brain on a few things. Many thanks, Scriv -- Brian Rohrbacher Reliable Internet, LLC www.reliableinter.net Cell 269-838-8338 Caught up in the Air 1 Thess. 4:17 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
