RE: [WISPA] Motor controlled rotating poles
Tom, Contact me offlist -- I know someone who can probably help you (he does custom work for University astronomy arrays) Cheap is a relative term =/ -Charles --- WiNOG Wireless Roadshows Coming to a City Near You http://www.winog.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Webster Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:51 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] Motor controlled rotating poles Tom, I would try and look up something from the ham radio realm. They have remote control systems for remote mounted radios. My idea would be is you can find something with a software package that can remotely control a rotor. This rotor would have your AP and camera mounted to the short section of mast on top of the rotor. This could be an inexpensive TV antenna rotor. Off the top of my head I can't think of anything that I know does this but that's because I don't play with remote controlled radios much. Thank You, Brian Webster www.wirelessmapping.com http://www.wirelessmapping.com -Original Message- From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:21 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Motor controlled rotating poles For the longest time, I wanted to build a solution to do the following, from each of our Master Cell Sites 1) Rotate a IP Camera 360 deg (remotely over an IP connection) 2) Rotate a Pole with a Trango Fox 5800SU on it 360 deg (remotely over IP connection). The purpose is two fold When Link quality severally degrades for a short period, either packet loss or rssi, 1) To discover/view when there is a third party worker working on the roof of our cell site. (Who may be standing in front of antennas periodically or testing gear that interfers without getting pre-approved) 2) To do a spectrum site survey, on the fly in any direction, to find the least noisy channel, WITHOUT taking the primary sector antenna down (offline). By having the radio and the camera on the same pole, it would help confirm which direction we were pointing exactly when doing the survey. One of the other requirements is that it won't turn more that 360 in one direction to prevent cable CAT5 breaking, and to ahve a refference of the starting point in deg, calibrated to a known direction (north 0 deg?). What would REALLY be cool, is if it had a speaker out put on the camera, so I could yell at the worker standing in front of my antenna :-). I'm aware that some camera may have an output for controlling a relay or servo motor, as some solutions/platforms exist to mount and rotate a single camera attached. Preferably, I'd like a solution that could rotate the pole itself. Everything of course would need to be outdoor survivable, and strong enough that the pole would stay errect and safe at 200-300 feet up. My thought is that maybe the controls could be initiated from the IP Camera connections, If I found a rotating platform/pole mount. Are there any mechanical hobbyists out there, that might suggest the most cost effective way to accomplish this? (My goal is lowest cost, lowest cost, lowest cost, so I can afford to replicate the solution at about 20 locations) Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] What the heck chews up 100mhz of 5.8ghz?!?
Not that this is a good practice...but Wmux radios are extremely sensative to interference on the Rx size (a wiff of anything takes it down) Figure out the Tx/Rx spread (may be 5.3 GHz on that particular site), and shut them down on the Rx side -- maybe then they'll talk =) -Charles P.S. -- if it's a short range shot, they can probably go licensed now for the same price as unlicensed, and they'd get out of your hair completely --- WiNOG Wireless Roadshows Coming to a City Near You http://www.winog.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Ireton Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 9:28 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] What the heck chews up 100mhz of 5.8ghz?!? Marlon K. Schafer wrote: yeppers. something like that. Triangulate in on where it's coming from and ask the folks that own the structure the antenna is on. It might be cheaper to pay them to change polarities than it is to reset your plan. I think the concensus - western multiplex - makes sense. And probbly a cell carrier. I do totally understand legacy equipment and such, but dammit I could get a few hundred mbps out of that same chunk and have channel space left over... but again that's using moden equipment. I know I probbly have zero chance of sucess, but would anyone think (provided I can find the operator) that we could work something out - either like a polarity change as marlon suggested, or just buy them some more spectrally effecient gear...? I understand they may need to have an actual T1 electrical interface, but there are a few players that can actually do this job with much much less spectrum. I know of ceragon and their fiberair, as well as redline can do this. I've never heard of a deal like this but it would be helpful. Otherwise I'm going to have to change plans and that's gonna be a little expensive. Sort of wish I'd done an SA first but it's in the middle of nowhere and I just assumed based on past experience it wasn't going to be a problem... WRONG! Mike- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] HIPAA
If I get a sit-down with the HIPAA compliance officer for the hospital here I am going to need to get someone else on the phone with them who is knowledgeable about HIPAA compliance who can help me sell the idea that wireless can be used in HIPAA compliant data transmission systems. Would yo be that person? If so then send me the best number to reach you at. I will let you know when I will have this meeting to make sure it is a time when you could talk if needed. Thanks, Scriv Peter R. wrote: A HIPAA consultant was at my luncheon yesterday. He pulled all this info for you: pulled a couple things below as background as well as the actual regulation. The one that pertains to this discussion is the last paragraph below. There is no strict rule as to how to secure and in actual fact, switched or dial-up networks are deemed more secure due to the random nature of the connection. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2003_registerdocid=fr20fe03-4.pdf The HIPAA Security Rule establishes specific requirements for securing all electronic protected health information (EPHI) -- while at rest (in servers or storage) or in motion (in transmission, wireless or wired). ‘‘Transmission security (refers to)… electronic protected health information is transmitted from one point to another, it must be protected in a manner commensurate with the associated risk.” § 164.312 Technical safeguards. A covered entity must, in accordance with § 164.306: (a)(1) Standard: Access control. Implement technical policies and procedures for electronic information systems that maintain electronic protected health information to allow access only to those persons or software programs that have been granted access rights as specified in § 164.308(a)(4). (2) Implementation specifications: (i) Unique user identification (Required). Assign a unique name and/or number for identifying and tracking user identity. (ii) Emergency access procedure (Required). Establish (and implement as needed) procedures for obtaining necessary electronic protected health information during an emergency. (iii) Automatic logoff (Addressable). Implement electronic procedures that terminate an electronic session after a predetermined time of inactivity. (iv) Encryption and decryption (Addressable). Implement a mechanism to encrypt and decrypt electronic protected health information. (b) Standard: Audit controls. Implement hardware, software, and/or procedural mechanisms that record and examine activity in information systems that contain or use electronic protected health information. (c)(1) Standard: Integrity. Implement policies and procedures to protect electronic protected health information from improper alteration or destruction. (2) Implementation specification: Mechanism to authenticate electronic protected health information (Addressable). Implement electronic mechanisms to corroborate that electronic protected health information has not been altered or destroyed in an unauthorized manner. (d) Standard: Person or entity authentication. Implement procedures to verify that a person or entity seeking access to electronic protected health information is the one claimed. (e)(1) Standard: Transmission security. Implement technical security measures to guard against unauthorized access to electronic protected health information that is being transmitted over an electronic communications network. (2) Implementation specifications: (i) Integrity controls (Addressable). Implement security measures to ensure that electronically transmitted electronic protected health information is not improperly modified without detection until disposed of. (ii) Encryption (Addressable). Implement a mechanism to encrypt electronic protected health information whenever deemed appropriate. Daniel L. Ruggles CISSP, CISM, CMC, IAM, PMP Principal Liaison Technologies, LLC -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] What the heck chews up 100mhz of 5.8ghz?!?
Funny you mention that, But you are right. We are located on a tower with a 2.4 WM and a 5ghz WM. We put our stuff up, ran the SA and went holy S***. We were able to move around them. But I forgot about them when I moved some channels around, and sure enough about 3 months later I was taking to the area tech and I asked how everything was working... They never could figure out why their t-1 radios kept dropping until I asked what channels they were running. Canopy gave them some problems, but we never saw anything. So now I have those channels blocked out.. Mike Bushard, Jr Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC 320-256-WISP (9477) 320-256-9478 Fax -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Wu Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 6:49 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] What the heck chews up 100mhz of 5.8ghz?!? Not that this is a good practice...but Wmux radios are extremely sensative to interference on the Rx size (a wiff of anything takes it down) Figure out the Tx/Rx spread (may be 5.3 GHz on that particular site), and shut them down on the Rx side -- maybe then they'll talk =) -Charles P.S. -- if it's a short range shot, they can probably go licensed now for the same price as unlicensed, and they'd get out of your hair completely --- WiNOG Wireless Roadshows Coming to a City Near You http://www.winog.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Ireton Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 9:28 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] What the heck chews up 100mhz of 5.8ghz?!? Marlon K. Schafer wrote: yeppers. something like that. Triangulate in on where it's coming from and ask the folks that own the structure the antenna is on. It might be cheaper to pay them to change polarities than it is to reset your plan. I think the concensus - western multiplex - makes sense. And probbly a cell carrier. I do totally understand legacy equipment and such, but dammit I could get a few hundred mbps out of that same chunk and have channel space left over... but again that's using moden equipment. I know I probbly have zero chance of sucess, but would anyone think (provided I can find the operator) that we could work something out - either like a polarity change as marlon suggested, or just buy them some more spectrally effecient gear...? I understand they may need to have an actual T1 electrical interface, but there are a few players that can actually do this job with much much less spectrum. I know of ceragon and their fiberair, as well as redline can do this. I've never heard of a deal like this but it would be helpful. Otherwise I'm going to have to change plans and that's gonna be a little expensive. Sort of wish I'd done an SA first but it's in the middle of nowhere and I just assumed based on past experience it wasn't going to be a problem... WRONG! Mike- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] What the heck chews up 100mhz of 5.8ghz?!?
Charles, I'm suprised! In general I would advocate cooperation and it sounds like perhaps there would be some options here if this does turn out to be a cell carrier or such. We would certainly like to continue earning our reputation as good guys - even with competitors who otherwise would not do likewise - I simply didn't expect this situation here. On a commercial tower we'd be screwed I know. But I think this goes both ways - since I'm going canopy here and going to do 5.8, it's going to hurt them and unintentionally so unless we figure something out. I do have sectorization as an option, as well as 5.2 and 2.4 and 900 if I really want. And cross polarization probbly won't be enough due to the high rssi already. Mike- Charles Wu wrote: Not that this is a good practice...but Wmux radios are extremely sensative to interference on the Rx size (a wiff of anything takes it down) Figure out the Tx/Rx spread (may be 5.3 GHz on that particular site), and shut them down on the Rx side -- maybe then they'll talk =) -Charles P.S. -- if it's a short range shot, they can probably go licensed now for the same price as unlicensed, and they'd get out of your hair completely -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] What the heck chews up 100mhz of 5.8ghz?!?
Also remember, its not only about doing the spectrum analsys upfront, but also an issue of choosing a broadcast site, where the management is savy enough to manage the spectrum use correctly at the site. Whether or not you interfere with colocated equipment should have been caught before any gear was ever even turned on, or a dollar spent in onsite time. Thats the advantage of paying for the use of spectrum from a site. Many people will install unlicensed gear, without contractually having the right to deploy it in the first place. Many Licensed carrier don;t understand its the appropirate practice to. So often, if you've paid for it, and they haven;t, you can make them take it down. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Mike Bushard, Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 10:39 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] What the heck chews up 100mhz of 5.8ghz?!? Funny you mention that, But you are right. We are located on a tower with a 2.4 WM and a 5ghz WM. We put our stuff up, ran the SA and went holy S***. We were able to move around them. But I forgot about them when I moved some channels around, and sure enough about 3 months later I was taking to the area tech and I asked how everything was working... They never could figure out why their t-1 radios kept dropping until I asked what channels they were running. Canopy gave them some problems, but we never saw anything. So now I have those channels blocked out.. Mike Bushard, Jr Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC 320-256-WISP (9477) 320-256-9478 Fax -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Wu Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 6:49 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] What the heck chews up 100mhz of 5.8ghz?!? Not that this is a good practice...but Wmux radios are extremely sensative to interference on the Rx size (a wiff of anything takes it down) Figure out the Tx/Rx spread (may be 5.3 GHz on that particular site), and shut them down on the Rx side -- maybe then they'll talk =) -Charles P.S. -- if it's a short range shot, they can probably go licensed now for the same price as unlicensed, and they'd get out of your hair completely --- WiNOG Wireless Roadshows Coming to a City Near You http://www.winog.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Ireton Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 9:28 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] What the heck chews up 100mhz of 5.8ghz?!? Marlon K. Schafer wrote: yeppers. something like that. Triangulate in on where it's coming from and ask the folks that own the structure the antenna is on. It might be cheaper to pay them to change polarities than it is to reset your plan. I think the concensus - western multiplex - makes sense. And probbly a cell carrier. I do totally understand legacy equipment and such, but dammit I could get a few hundred mbps out of that same chunk and have channel space left over... but again that's using moden equipment. I know I probbly have zero chance of sucess, but would anyone think (provided I can find the operator) that we could work something out - either like a polarity change as marlon suggested, or just buy them some more spectrally effecient gear...? I understand they may need to have an actual T1 electrical interface, but there are a few players that can actually do this job with much much less spectrum. I know of ceragon and their fiberair, as well as redline can do this. I've never heard of a deal like this but it would be helpful. Otherwise I'm going to have to change plans and that's gonna be a little expensive. Sort of wish I'd done an SA first but it's in the middle of nowhere and I just assumed based on past experience it wasn't going to be a problem... WRONG! Mike- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] 900 Mhz Mikrotik SR9 Clients
Where are people buying their SR9 client setups, if at all ? What kind of pricing per CPE I'm looking at a couple places, and coming back with like $350 each for a rootenna / cable / SR9 / P.S. and RB112 Anyone see anything different ? R -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 900 Mhz Mikrotik SR9 Clients
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Rick Smith wrote: Where are people buying their SR9 client setups, if at all ? What kind of pricing per CPE I'm looking at a couple places, and coming back with like $350 each for a rootenna / cable / SR9 / P.S. and RB112 Anyone see anything different ? While I am not purchasing these today (being that I am no longer an ISP), I can't tell you where you can purchase them, but I'd expect $300-400 for a complete system. -- Butch Evans Network Engineering and Security Consulting 573-276-2879 http://www.butchevans.com/ Mikrotik Certified Consultant (http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html) -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 900 Mhz Mikrotik SR9 Clients
http://www.star-v3.com/store/ $262 ea in ten packs + roo. Rick Smith wrote: Where are people buying their SR9 client setups, if at all ? What kind of pricing per CPE I'm looking at a couple places, and coming back with like $350 each for a rootenna / cable / SR9 / P.S. and RB112 Anyone see anything different ? R -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] What the heck chews up 100mhz of 5.8ghz?!?
Some unscrupulous operators also may use them Tsunamis to kill/squat on the spectrum to prevent new commers. This is a large part of the advantage of using sectorized, is you find out where the noise sources are and engineer around them. If you are in their direct path and close, it may mean changing cell site locations or frequency range. The good news is its probably a very directional antenna, and feasible that you could not interfere with them by moving your cell site location. There are several other brands other than Tsunmai that also allow use of all the channels. Its usually the outcome of older legacy gear that attempted 45mbps or higher links. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 9:16 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] What the heck chews up 100mhz of 5.8ghz?!? Sounds like and old western multiplex tsunami used by cell carriers for tower backhaul Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Ireton Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 9:25 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] What the heck chews up 100mhz of 5.8ghz?!? While installing a new canopy accesspoint today, in an unserved community with no other wireless isps and little else, I discovered that I have about a -56 avarage across the entire swath of 5750mhz thru 5845mhz... what the hell?!?!? It's a small area deployment and we had planned on a simple low gain omni, but not now... I don't know who or what but 100mhz, is that really necessary? I'm going to take an sm later and see if I can get a better picture and determine the direction of these signals and see if there's going to be any way to make this work. Out in the middle of nowhere. But does anyone have any idea what in gods name could occupy this much continuous spectrum in 5.8? Mike- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Winter Cleaning
I have the following Alvarion equipment that needs a home (all unopened new in box) Q3 AUE-NI-900 Q13 SU-I-D-900 Anyone interested? -Charles --- WiNOG Wireless Roadshows Coming to a City Near You http://www.winog.com -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Re: [equipment-l] 900 Mhz Mikrotik SR9 Clients
$287 plus antenna and shipping is what we figure. Justin -- Justin S. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] CCNA - A+ - N+ - ACSA - COMTRAIN Access - WISP Consulting - Tower Climbing Web: http://www.mtin.net Web: http://www.jwilson.ws On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Rick Smith wrote: Where are people buying their SR9 client setups, if at all ? What kind of pricing per CPE I'm looking at a couple places, and coming back with like $350 each for a rootenna / cable / SR9 / P.S. and RB112 Anyone see anything different ? R -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Killer new white paper on advanced antenna tech, etc.
Complex concepts like MIMO, beam-forming, SOFDMA, etc. very well explained with rich, clean graphics. Not product promotion. I think it is our best technology paper ever. Who wants a copy? (HIT ME OFFLIST with WHITEPAPER in the subject line) Patrick Leary AVP WISP Markets Alvarion, Inc. o: 650.314.2628 c: 760.580.0080 Vonage: 650.641.1243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals computer viruses. -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] illegal CPE installs
I would imagine they're counting on the FCC making some changes in 5.2, but maybe they're just risking it. After all, the customer base is the only value they're looking for. The FCC fine might be minuscule in comparison, I don't know. Rk At 02:58 PM 11/27/2006, you wrote: Hi, Curious to everyone's thoughts about a regional WISP installing illegal CPE units? They are using Last Mile Gear 120degree Canopy 120 degree sectors (5.2GHz) and then putting the Canopy 5.2GHz SM in dishes at customer locations. I am talking about thousands of CPE installed this way and doing more every day. This company covers several western states (Idaho, Utah, Nevada, etc.) and also does Dish Network satellite TV installs. Is this OK? What are everyone's thoughts? Travis Microserv -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
