Re: [WISPA] Free Press Floods the FCC With Net Neutrality Petitions

2010-12-15 Thread Jeff Broadwick - Lists
You nailed it Tom!

 

Regards,

Jeff
ImageStream Sales Manager
800-813-5123 x106

  _  

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:30 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Free Press Floods the FCC With Net Neutrality Petitions

 

Oldest trick in the book, attach a position to an ideological word that
people cant disagree with. Who can disagree with freedom.

 

Little does the public know they are supporting a position that could reduce
freedom and possibly even destroy their freedom of choice, as they signon to
positition that will reduce speeds, increase costs, reduce investment, and
destroy small competitive providers. 

 

Freedom really means no regulation, so providers can have the freedom to
build networks without unnecessary beurocracy and burdens.

Freedom to allow people to build businesses based without strings attached.

 

Ironically, Google is one of the largest advocates of NEtNEutrality but yet
one of the largeset threats to freedom. NetNEutrality is best purposed to
stop abuse of power by those with market power. I'd argue Google has
majority market power beyond that of any single access provider. Google has
more eyeballs and and steers Internet traffic more than any other entity. 

 

What would happen if we made a Save the Small Provider, the real Open
Internet or Vote Content Neutrality not NetNeutrality for an Open
Internet would it get a top indexing on search engines? Or would the Save
the INternet Pro NetNEutrality get the top Indexing? 

 

Google has the power allow consumers to see the point of view of content
providers, but to prevent their access to view Access provider's point of
view.

On a critical vote week like this week, Google has power to censor what
consumers can find and have access to.  What preventing Google from doing
that right now, and compromising our Free country?   

 

What makes content providers a better steward of Freedom than Access
providers?

 

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband

 

 

- Original Message - 

From: Cameron Crum mailto:cc...@wispmon.com  

To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org  

Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 4:32 PM

Subject: Re: [WISPA] Free Press Floods the FCC With Net Neutrality Petitions

 

I just sent ours in.

Cameron

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Rick Harnish rharn...@wispa.org wrote:

While normally an ally of WISPA, in this case Free Press is taking a
position that is opposite WISPs feelings on this topic.  This is a MAJOR
reason while it is absolutely essential that ALL WISPs take the time to file
by 5:00 PM tomorrow.  I have attached the WISPA filing and a template to
use.

 

Once you have customized the letter, please make a .pdf copy or a .doc file
and upload it at the following website.
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/upload/display?z=rhroc.  If you choose not to
use the WISPA template letter but want to write your own comments, you can
either follow the previous procedure or use the Express filing method at
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/upload/display?z=nc5cd.  The proceeding number
ET Docket Nos. 09-191 and WC Docket No. 07-52.  You can add the second
Proceeding Number by clicking Add Proceeding.

 

 


Free Press Floods FCC With Net Neutrality Petitions


Group wants Commission to toughen up chairman's proposed compromise order


By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting  Cable, 12/13/2010 11:45:52 AM


Free Press is killing some trees to try and save the Internet.

Free Press says that
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/common/jumplink.php?target=http%3A%2F%2Fac
t2.freepress.net%2Fsign%2Freal_net_neutrality%2F%3Fsource%3Dposterous
SavetheInternet.com volunteers will be hand-delivering 2 million petitions
to the FCC, with volunteers making the trek every hour on the hour until
sometime Tuesday.

Free Press wants the FCC to toughen up the chairman's proposed compromise
order expanding and codifying its network openness rules. The order does not
rely on reclassifying broadband access under some common carrier regs (Title
II), allows for specialized services, and does not apply most of them to
wireless broadband.

The FCC is planning to vote on the order Dec. 21, which is still subject to
edits and emendations as the commissioners vet the draft.

Free Press calls the chairmen's proposal a toothless effort that give[s]
just about everything to giant phone and cable companies, and leave[s]
Internet users with almost nothing.

That two million are not all in response to the compromise FCC proposal, but
represent the names on a number of different petitions on net neutrality
cirucluated over the past couple of years, according to Free Press' Craig
Aaron.

Copies of the different petitions are being attached to the appropriate list
of names, approximately 50,000 per boxful, which are being delivered hourly
to the commission through Tuesday. 

To monitor the progress of 

[WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Matt
Our current email server is getting a bit over loaded.  Disk I/O is
getting to be an issue on it.  Hosting about 2000 accounts.  Likely
just going to move current solution to a bigger and newer RAID array.
Before I do that thought I would ask what other solutions are out
there?  Prefer to keep it in house and keep costs down.  Current
solution actually works ok just such a pain whenever it needs
upgraded.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Chris Gotstein
We've been very happy with MagicMail by LinuxMagic.  Solid platform and
the support is very good.

   
Chris Gotstein, Network Engineer, U.P. Logon/Computer Connection U.P.
http://uplogon.com | +1 906 774 4847 | ch...@uplogon.com

On 12/15/2010 9:38 AM, Matt wrote:
 Our current email server is getting a bit over loaded.  Disk I/O is
 getting to be an issue on it.  Hosting about 2000 accounts.  Likely
 just going to move current solution to a bigger and newer RAID array.
 Before I do that thought I would ask what other solutions are out
 there?  Prefer to keep it in house and keep costs down.  Current
 solution actually works ok just such a pain whenever it needs
 upgraded.
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Josh Luthman
We do Gmail.  Cheap, it works, next to no support cost.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373



On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
 Our current email server is getting a bit over loaded.  Disk I/O is
 getting to be an issue on it.  Hosting about 2000 accounts.  Likely
 just going to move current solution to a bigger and newer RAID array.
 Before I do that thought I would ask what other solutions are out
 there?  Prefer to keep it in house and keep costs down.  Current
 solution actually works ok just such a pain whenever it needs
 upgraded.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Jeremie Chism
We use fasthosts.com. 50.00 per month for unlimited standard email accounts. 
9.95 per year for advanced. 

Sent from my iPhone4

On Dec 15, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

 Our current email server is getting a bit over loaded.  Disk I/O is
 getting to be an issue on it.  Hosting about 2000 accounts.  Likely
 just going to move current solution to a bigger and newer RAID array.
 Before I do that thought I would ask what other solutions are out
 there?  Prefer to keep it in house and keep costs down.  Current
 solution actually works ok just such a pain whenever it needs
 upgraded.
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread jp
We do our own email too with linux and just upgraded some stuff for the 
same and similar issues. Old box: amd64x2 or phenom9500 with 
postfix/amavisdnew/clamav/spamassassin spamd/spamc. New box: phenom 
1075t, postfix/clamsmtp/clamav/spamassassin spamd/spamc/usermin. A new 
seagate enterprise hard drive seems a lot better performing than old 
120-250gig consumer seagate drives. ddr3 memory and the new processor 
absolutely blows the old stuff out of the water. going from 4-8 or 
8-16gb ram makes a huge improvement in simultaneous mail flow. I think 
the new faster parts and clamsmtp instead of amavis have made a big 
difference. We actually run things over a couple boxes with perdition to 
divide the load by first letter of the customer username. Then we can 
migrate customers to new servers one or more letters at a time and add 
capacity as needed.


On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:38:01AM -0600, Matt wrote:
 Our current email server is getting a bit over loaded.  Disk I/O is
 getting to be an issue on it.  Hosting about 2000 accounts.  Likely
 just going to move current solution to a bigger and newer RAID array.
 Before I do that thought I would ask what other solutions are out
 there?  Prefer to keep it in house and keep costs down.  Current
 solution actually works ok just such a pain whenever it needs
 upgraded.
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
/*
Jason Philbrook   |   Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
KB1IOJ|   Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting 
 http://f64.nu/   |   for Midcoast Mainehttp://www.midcoast.com/
*/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Chuck Hogg
+1 on Google... tech support for email has about gone away.
Regards,

Chuck


On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Kevin Neal ke...@safelink.net wrote:

 Icewarp here.  There are some that don't like it, personally, I
 haven't had to adjust any server settings for several years.

 -Kevin


 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
  Our current email server is getting a bit over loaded.  Disk I/O is
  getting to be an issue on it.  Hosting about 2000 accounts.  Likely
  just going to move current solution to a bigger and newer RAID array.
  Before I do that thought I would ask what other solutions are out
  there?  Prefer to keep it in house and keep costs down.  Current
  solution actually works ok just such a pain whenever it needs
  upgraded.
 
 
 
 
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Josh Luthman
I get a call every few months, for one thing or another (forgotten
password, forgotten email address, etc).  I wish mine had gone away,
but I sure can't complain how minimal it is now.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373



On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
 +1 on Google... tech support for email has about gone away.
 Regards,

 Chuck


 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Kevin Neal ke...@safelink.net wrote:

 Icewarp here.  There are some that don't like it, personally, I
 haven't had to adjust any server settings for several years.

 -Kevin


 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
  Our current email server is getting a bit over loaded.  Disk I/O is
  getting to be an issue on it.  Hosting about 2000 accounts.  Likely
  just going to move current solution to a bigger and newer RAID array.
  Before I do that thought I would ask what other solutions are out
  there?  Prefer to keep it in house and keep costs down.  Current
  solution actually works ok just such a pain whenever it needs
  upgraded.
 
 
 
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Justin Wilson
I agree with chuck. If you are looking to outsource e-mail go with
Google.  To e-mail outsourcing e-mail is a deeply personal decision.  After
maintaining mail servers for the past 15+ years I had to spend a lot of time
thinking about outsourcing for a client.  It was a great fit for them. At
current google rates 2000 customers would cost you $700 a month.  If you
don¹t have to maintain servers and deal with many of the technical issues
you might actually save money.

Justin
-- 
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
Aol  Yahoo IM: j2sw
http://www.mtin.net/blog ­ xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw ­ Follow me on Twitter
Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support




From: Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:54:31 -0500
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

+1 on Google... tech support for email has about gone away.
Regards,

Chuck


On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Kevin Neal ke...@safelink.net wrote:
 Icewarp here.  There are some that don't like it, personally, I
 haven't had to adjust any server settings for several years.
 
 -Kevin
 
 
 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
  Our current email server is getting a bit over loaded.  Disk I/O is
  getting to be an issue on it.  Hosting about 2000 accounts.  Likely
  just going to move current solution to a bigger and newer RAID array.
  Before I do that thought I would ask what other solutions are out
  there?  Prefer to keep it in house and keep costs down.  Current
  solution actually works ok just such a pain whenever it needs
  upgraded.
 
 
  
 
-
---
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  
 
-
---
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Justin Wilson
If you want to continue hosing your own look at clustering with some
fast disks backing it up.  We have one client that has a 6 machine cluster
with a SAN ³feeding² it.  They have two machines at the front end which
direct the traffic and 4 machines behind it which do the actual work.  All
the data is mounted via a fiber switch to a SAN.

Justin

-- 
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
Aol  Yahoo IM: j2sw
http://www.mtin.net/blog ­ xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw ­ Follow me on Twitter
Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support




From: Matt lm7...@gmail.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:38:01 -0600
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Email Accounts

Our current email server is getting a bit over loaded.  Disk I/O is
getting to be an issue on it.  Hosting about 2000 accounts.  Likely
just going to move current solution to a bigger and newer RAID array.
Before I do that thought I would ask what other solutions are out
there?  Prefer to keep it in house and keep costs down.  Current
solution actually works ok just such a pain whenever it needs
upgraded.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] [IMPORTANCE LEVEL: HIGH] Network Neutrality Ex Parte Letter Template for Operators to file

2010-12-15 Thread Fred Goldstein

At 12/15/2010 01:27 AM, Tom DeReggi wrote:

Fred,

Excellent Filing.



Thanks.

The big risk is abuse of power by those with dominent market power, 
thus possibly the need for some targeted regulation. But I'm not 
aware of any WISPs that has scaled large enough to have dominent 
market power to the extent to become a risk to consumers or other 
providers. I asked for Fixed Wireless to be exempt from 
NetNeutrality restrictions simply because there is no market need to 
regulate a small provider.


This is a classic case of where American-style regulation goes 
awry.  In most other countries, regulation addresses market 
power.  Big companies are regulated more closely than small ones if 
the market is concentrated.  In the EU, a 25% market share is 
presumptive of significant market power (SMP), the first step 
towards regulation.


But in the US, we draw false analogies based on what people do, 
rather than on what power they have, and we pretend it's fair to 
the powerful megacorporations to make the same rules apply to 
everyone, however small.  This goes beyond telecom.  In the current 
food safety debate, there's a major press to rid the country of The 
Scourge of the Bake Sale, wherein people cook food in, gag, *home 
kitchens*, not certified, and sell them.  We all[1] know how many 
millions of people die every year from home cooking, of course, so 
safe food must come from regulated, managed industrial-scale factories!


[1] We all in this case refers to certain op-ed columnists who only 
eat in restaurants, but who portray themselves as centrists by 
taking positions nobody else has, and to a handful of politicians who 
live to please them.


So the same sort of thing applies to telecom and Internet.  Most 
people get it from a Big Company that has SMP, and they've been 
scared into assuming that the big company will abuse it.  This is 
perfectly understandable; I think that certain large companies (no 
names, but they tend to have the rights to the collective trademark 
Bell) would love to put the squeeze on.  So they want to put rules 
on ISPs.  If asked, I doubt most people who support neutrality on 
principle would want to squeeze a little WISP -- they're thinking big 
telco and MSO -- but the big telcos are using this as a way to put 
the squeeze on the little guys.  I even noticed a Verizon-funded 
front group putting in ex parte comments yesterday for real neutrality.


CLECs are subject to similar silliness, btw, being regulated 
entities.  Not neutrality -- as common carriers, CLECs are 
neutral.  Federal law says that states cannot price-regulate them, 
and they have no market power.  But states still require them to file 
tariffs, with pretend rates, as if they were ILECs. States and the 
FCC require detailed filings of reports.  It's all set up to be 
fair to the Bells by making small competitors do the work that big ones do.


That's why the regulatory debate has to be refocused.  I'm impressed 
by the great turnout of WISP ex-parte letters.  The FreePrers did 
submit long lists of names of supporters, but even some of them, if 
asked, would recognize that WISPs shouldn't be held to the same 
standards as the big guys.  But they generally neither know nor care 
about our existence.  They are already suffering from Broadband 
Stockholm Syndrome, and would rather argue about the food in the 
prison canteen than think about real freedom.


 --
 Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
 ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
 +1 617 795 2701 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Mike Hammett
I put everything on virtual servers.  There's no reinstallation, 
reconfiguration, etc. required to migrate to new hardware.  Just install 
on the host OS on a new box and migrate the container over.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 12/15/2010 9:38 AM, Matt wrote:
 Our current email server is getting a bit over loaded.  Disk I/O is
 getting to be an issue on it.  Hosting about 2000 accounts.  Likely
 just going to move current solution to a bigger and newer RAID array.
 Before I do that thought I would ask what other solutions are out
 there?  Prefer to keep it in house and keep costs down.  Current
 solution actually works ok just such a pain whenever it needs
 upgraded.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Brad Belton
Agreed.  VMware is amazing.  Server management is no longer cumbersome and
with HA (high availability) running there are no more hardware worries.
Servers are no longer rack-mounted boxes, but instead just files we can drag
- drop - copy - start - stop - upgrade - downgrade with a click of a mouse.

The power savings are terrific too.  Fewer servers (hosts) running = power
savings.  Less heat generated in datacenter means fewer Liebert A/C systems
running = power savings.  More datacenter floor space to sell...virtual
servers are better in every aspect.

Best,

Brad


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 11:08 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

I put everything on virtual servers.  There's no reinstallation,
reconfiguration, etc. required to migrate to new hardware.  Just install on
the host OS on a new box and migrate the container over.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 12/15/2010 9:38 AM, Matt wrote:
 Our current email server is getting a bit over loaded.  Disk I/O is 
 getting to be an issue on it.  Hosting about 2000 accounts.  Likely 
 just going to move current solution to a bigger and newer RAID array.
 Before I do that thought I would ask what other solutions are out 
 there?  Prefer to keep it in house and keep costs down.  Current 
 solution actually works ok just such a pain whenever it needs 
 upgraded.


 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Matt
 I put everything on virtual servers.  There's no reinstallation,
 reconfiguration, etc. required to migrate to new hardware.  Just install
 on the host OS on a new box and migrate the container over.

I have heard that for I/O intensive applications they are not a good
choice.  Email is definitely I/O intensive.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Mike Hammett
I think it really depends on your load.  A client of mine has a 1500+ 
account Exchange installation and everything there is virtualized.  I 
think it just depends on your infrastructure, hardware, load balancing, etc.

I haven't reached that much volume, however, to know myself how that 
pans out.

Also, RAID 10 is better for IO intensive operations than 5.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 12/15/2010 11:33 AM, Matt wrote:
 I put everything on virtual servers.  There's no reinstallation,
 reconfiguration, etc. required to migrate to new hardware.  Just install
 on the host OS on a new box and migrate the container over.
 I have heard that for I/O intensive applications they are not a good
 choice.  Email is definitely I/O intensive.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Matt
Anyone used iRedMail?

http://www.iredmail.org/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi8CF3RKRm4



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Justin Wilson
  Virtualization requires more hardware to be thrown at it.  Since your are
running the Applications within an operating system it requires beefier CPU
and more memory.

Justin
-- 
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
Aol  Yahoo IM: j2sw
http://www.mtin.net/blog ­ xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw ­ Follow me on Twitter
Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support




From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:39:05 -0600
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

I think it really depends on your load.  A client of mine has a 1500+
account Exchange installation and everything there is virtualized.  I
think it just depends on your infrastructure, hardware, load balancing, etc.

I haven't reached that much volume, however, to know myself how that
pans out.

Also, RAID 10 is better for IO intensive operations than 5.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 12/15/2010 11:33 AM, Matt wrote:
 I put everything on virtual servers.  There's no reinstallation,
 reconfiguration, etc. required to migrate to new hardware.  Just install
 on the host OS on a new box and migrate the container over.
 I have heard that for I/O intensive applications they are not a good
 choice.  Email is definitely I/O intensive.


 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 


 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Matt
 Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support.  Dell
 support has been fantastic too.

I think Redhat uses KVM?

http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/

Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon.  How does it compare to VMware?



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Brad Belton
I'm sure that would largely depend on the host or hosts platform you are
using for the virtual servers.  Ours is a Dell blade chassis with M610
blades currently attached to 7TB of 15K drives.  We haven't seen any I/O
issues...

Just because you can spin up 100 servers on one host doesn't mean that's a
good idea!  The great thing about VMware is its ability to constantly
monitor all servers and manage your total host resource pool to maximize
your hardware utilization.  As our CPU, RAM or HDD needs increase we simply
add additional blades (hosts) and additional storage.  We can manually
migrate virtual servers away from any particular host that we want to remove
or take down for maintenance without losing a single ping to the server
being migrated.  Ok, maybe I saw one ping lost once doing this...

Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support.  Dell
support has been fantastic too.

Best,


Brad


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 11:34 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

 I put everything on virtual servers.  There's no reinstallation, 
 reconfiguration, etc. required to migrate to new hardware.  Just 
 install on the host OS on a new box and migrate the container over.

I have heard that for I/O intensive applications they are not a good choice.
Email is definitely I/O intensive.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Travis Johnson
We are hosting 10,000 email accounts on a single box running Linux with 
Postfix. Using 4GB of RAM and a simple RAID10 config with SATA drives.

Travis
Microserv


On 12/15/2010 8:38 AM, Matt wrote:
 Our current email server is getting a bit over loaded.  Disk I/O is
 getting to be an issue on it.  Hosting about 2000 accounts.  Likely
 just going to move current solution to a bigger and newer RAID array.
 Before I do that thought I would ask what other solutions are out
 there?  Prefer to keep it in house and keep costs down.  Current
 solution actually works ok just such a pain whenever it needs
 upgraded.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Cameron Crum
On the Gmail...how cheap is cheap? They just quoted us $50 per user per year
(that's over $4/month per user JUST for email). That's pretty pricey to me.
People complain about the price of our software which does a ton of stuff at
less than $1/month/sub.

Cameron

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

  Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support.  Dell
  support has been fantastic too.

 I think Redhat uses KVM?

 http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/

 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon.  How does it compare to
 VMware?



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Jumbo Frames

2010-12-15 Thread RickG
Well, I havent analysed it yet but with all the facebook uploads, online
backups, and email attachedments going on I wonder if that is the case?

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:31 AM, David E. Smith d...@mvn.net wrote:



 On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 23:23, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 Is there any reason to enable Jumbo Frames? My RB1000 and Dell switches
 have the capabilities. Time Warner says they can enable it on my fiber
 switch if I want.


 It probably won't hurt, but unless you're regularly moving very large files
 point-to-point (and can enable jumbo frames on all the intermediate gear) it
 also probably won't have any noticeable benefit.

 David Smith
 MVN.net





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




-- 
-RickG



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Justin Wilson
http://www.ikano.com/vendor/googleapps-key-features_vendor.asp

.35 cents a user a month. $4.20 a user per year.
-- 
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
Aol  Yahoo IM: j2sw
http://www.mtin.net/blog ­ xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw ­ Follow me on Twitter
Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support




From: Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:28:53 -0600
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

On the Gmail...how cheap is cheap? They just quoted us $50 per user per year
(that's over $4/month per user JUST for email). That's pretty pricey to me.
People complain about the price of our software which does a ton of stuff at
less than $1/month/sub.

Cameron

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
  Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support.  Dell
  support has been fantastic too.
 
 I think Redhat uses KVM?
 
 http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/
 
 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon.  How does it compare to VMware?
 
 
 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Jumbo Frames

2010-12-15 Thread David E. Smith
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:30, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well, I havent analysed it yet but with all the facebook uploads, online
 backups, and email attachedments going on I wonder if that is the case?


First, by very large files I'm thinking tens of terabytes. Second, there's
only a benefit to jumbo-frames if EVERY device between the two endpoints
supports it. Chances are, the end-user's desktop doesn't support it (or
doesn't have it enabled), or you've got an old switch at a tower, or someone
at a co-lo on the other coast forgot to enable it. If any piece of gear
between the two doesn't support jumbo frames, your giant packet will get
fragmented anyway, and you may end up with worse performance.

Obviously, you want to bench-test for your particular application, but
outside of some specialized environments (like Internet2) jumbo frames don't
really win you very much.

David Smith
MVN.net



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Chuck Hogg
You need to get with the Partner edition.  If you join FISPA the pricing is
better, but I think the advertised price is .35/mailbox/year.

My rep is
Shaun Hogan
s...@ikano.com

Regards,
Chuck


On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote:

 On the Gmail...how cheap is cheap? They just quoted us $50 per user per
 year (that's over $4/month per user JUST for email). That's pretty pricey to
 me. People complain about the price of our software which does a ton of
 stuff at less than $1/month/sub.

 Cameron


 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

  Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support.
  Dell
  support has been fantastic too.

 I think Redhat uses KVM?

 http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/

 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon.  How does it compare to
 VMware?



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Jumbo Frames

2010-12-15 Thread RickG
Thats what I wanted to know. You're right - no benefit for my end users.
Thanks!

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:40 PM, David E. Smith d...@mvn.net wrote:



 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:30, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well, I havent analysed it yet but with all the facebook uploads, online
 backups, and email attachedments going on I wonder if that is the case?


 First, by very large files I'm thinking tens of terabytes. Second,
 there's only a benefit to jumbo-frames if EVERY device between the two
 endpoints supports it. Chances are, the end-user's desktop doesn't support
 it (or doesn't have it enabled), or you've got an old switch at a tower, or
 someone at a co-lo on the other coast forgot to enable it. If any piece of
 gear between the two doesn't support jumbo frames, your giant packet will
 get fragmented anyway, and you may end up with worse performance.

 Obviously, you want to bench-test for your particular application, but
 outside of some specialized environments (like Internet2) jumbo frames don't
 really win you very much.

 David Smith
 MVN.net





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




-- 
-RickG



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Cameron Crum
I asked the google rep and he said it is not available anymore...maybe he's
an idiot.

Cameron

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:

 You need to get with the Partner edition.  If you join FISPA the pricing is
 better, but I think the advertised price is .35/mailbox/year.

 My rep is
 Shaun Hogan
 s...@ikano.com

 Regards,
 Chuck



 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote:

 On the Gmail...how cheap is cheap? They just quoted us $50 per user per
 year (that's over $4/month per user JUST for email). That's pretty pricey to
 me. People complain about the price of our software which does a ton of
 stuff at less than $1/month/sub.

 Cameron


 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

  Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support.
  Dell
  support has been fantastic too.

 I think Redhat uses KVM?

 http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/

 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon.  How does it compare to
 VMware?



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Jumbo Frames

2010-12-15 Thread Kristian Hoffmann
Based on my understanding, it won't make a difference unless both ends
of the connection and every router in between has its MTU set 1500.
You can have the MTU set to 9000 on every router on your network, but if
your customer's router/PC is 1500, all frames will be 1500.  People on
NANOG were discussing this a couple of weeks ago when talking about
optimizing multi-hundred megabit transfers across the Internet where
they had optimized it on their network, both endpoints, and arranged it
with all of their transit providers.  But it's not something you can
just turn on in the middle and get more speed.

-Kristian


On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 13:30 -0500, RickG wrote:
 Well, I havent analysed it yet but with all the facebook uploads,
 online backups, and email attachedments going on I wonder if that is
 the case?
 
 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:31 AM, David E. Smith d...@mvn.net wrote:
 
 
 On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 23:23, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Is there any reason to enable Jumbo Frames? My RB1000
 and Dell switches have the capabilities. Time Warner
 says they can enable it on my fiber switch if I want.
 
 
 It probably won't hurt, but unless you're regularly moving
 very large files point-to-point (and can enable jumbo frames
 on all the intermediate gear) it also probably won't have any
 noticeable benefit.
 
 
 David Smith
 MVN.net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 -- 
 -RickG
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Justin Wilson
I was told the ISP partner edition is no longer available, which is
different from the Google Apps Partner edition.  In a nustshell the ISP
edition was free if you qualified.

Justin
-- 
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
Aol  Yahoo IM: j2sw
http://www.mtin.net/blog ­ xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw ­ Follow me on Twitter
Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support




From: Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:43:54 -0600
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

I asked the google rep and he said it is not available anymore...maybe he's
an idiot.

Cameron

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
 You need to get with the Partner edition.  If you join FISPA the pricing is
 better, but I think the advertised price is .35/mailbox/year.  
 
 My rep is 
 Shaun Hogan
 s...@ikano.com 
 
 Regards,
 Chuck
 
 
 
 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote:
 On the Gmail...how cheap is cheap? They just quoted us $50 per user per year
 (that's over $4/month per user JUST for email). That's pretty pricey to me.
 People complain about the price of our software which does a ton of stuff at
 less than $1/month/sub.
 
 Cameron
 
 
 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
  Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support.  Dell
  support has been fantastic too.
 
 I think Redhat uses KVM?
 
 http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/
 
 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon.  How does it compare to
 VMware?
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 -
 ---
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 -
 ---
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] Colo contract language

2010-12-15 Thread Richey
Does anyone have some language they can share on a colo agreement?  I've got
everything worked out except for exclusive use of the unlicensed bands at
that site.   I want to prevent someone from renting space and parking their
gear on the same frequencies I am using.

 

 

Richey 

AISG NetOps.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Chuck Hogg
Send Shaun an email...tell him Chuck Hogg from Shelby Broadband sent
you...he'll take care of ya.
Regards,

Chuck


On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote:

 I asked the google rep and he said it is not available anymore...maybe he's
 an idiot.

 Cameron


 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:

 You need to get with the Partner edition.  If you join FISPA the pricing
 is better, but I think the advertised price is .35/mailbox/year.

 My rep is
 Shaun Hogan
 s...@ikano.com

 Regards,
 Chuck



 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote:

 On the Gmail...how cheap is cheap? They just quoted us $50 per user per
 year (that's over $4/month per user JUST for email). That's pretty pricey to
 me. People complain about the price of our software which does a ton of
 stuff at less than $1/month/sub.

 Cameron


 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

  Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support.
  Dell
  support has been fantastic too.

 I think Redhat uses KVM?

 http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/

 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon.  How does it compare to
 VMware?



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Mike Hammett
Historically, RHEL\CentOS have used Xen.  I'm not sure if any other 
methods are working their way into current releases.

OpenVZ (managed through ProxMox) is a great way to host many 
resource-lite containers.  There's only 2 - 3% overhead and they can 
really add up low use servers.  If you're not using OpenVZ, I'd probably 
go to VMWare.  They have a free version and you can migrate that to the 
paid version when you're ready.  The paid version has all the fancy HA 
and load balancing features.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 12/15/2010 12:07 PM, Matt wrote:
 Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support.  Dell
 support has been fantastic too.
 I think Redhat uses KVM?

 http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/

 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon.  How does it compare to VMware?


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Free Press Floods the FCC With Net Neutrality Petitions

2010-12-15 Thread Charles N Wyble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/14/2010 11:29 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
 Oldest trick in the book, attach a position to an ideological word that 
 people cant disagree with. Who can disagree with freedom.
 
 Little does the public know they are supporting a position that could reduce 
 freedom and possibly even destroy their freedom of choice, as they signon to 
 positition that will reduce speeds, increase costs, reduce investment, and 
 destroy small competitive providers. 
 
 Freedom really means no regulation, so providers can have the freedom to 
 build networks without unnecessary beurocracy and burdens.
 Freedom to allow people to build businesses based without strings attached.

Um no regulation? Really? So if I build out a large cable plant I
can charge whatever I want, deny access to people, sue anyone who tries
to compete into the ground, not upgrade my infrastructure and provide
best effort 911 service?

I know that many in the operations community oppose regulation, but it's
a two edged sword.


 
 Ironically, Google is one of the largest advocates of NEtNEutrality but yet 
 one of the largeset threats to freedom. NetNEutrality is best purposed to 
 stop abuse of power by those with market power. I'd argue Google has majority 
 market power beyond that of any single access provider. Google has more 
 eyeballs and and steers Internet traffic more than any other entity. 
 
 What would happen if we made a Save the Small Provider, the real Open 
 Internet or Vote Content Neutrality not NetNeutrality for an Open Internet 
 would it get a top indexing on search engines? Or would the Save the 
 INternet Pro NetNEutrality get the top Indexing? 
 
 Google has the power allow consumers to see the point of view of content 
 providers, but to prevent their access to view Access provider's point of 
 view.
 On a critical vote week like this week, Google has power to censor what 
 consumers can find and have access to.  What preventing Google from doing 
 that right now, and compromising our Free country?   

Google is an advertising company. A very successful one. Having done
extensive work in the advertising industry, I can tell you that
censorship is the least of your worries. The threats to freedom come
from the amount of information that is collected and collated on
individuals and used to target advertising.

Yes they possess extensive capabilities to support their distribution
channel. Yes that channel is getting more and more extensive on a
regular basis (search/maps/mail/mobile/tv).

They have an open peering policy. They actively encourage people to peer
with them and work out the best traffic engineering policies.

How many folks here have peered with google and built TE policies? I
know of at least one WISP that has. I have worked for organizations that
exchanged massive amounts of traffic with google/microsoft and other
large brands.

There is a massive amount of things that happen behind the scenes, when
you move from the access to distribution layer. Most people that speak
publicly in the operations community are at the access layer (running
eyeball networks). Very few people from the content
provider/distribution space speak publicly. I am limited in what I can
say, as I'm bound by various NDA. However I can say that the content
providers and eye ball networks are interested in working out a good
deal for everyone because of all the interdependencies in the digital
asset supply chain. (Comcast being the obvious exception).


Now I am of the impression that we need to have some regulation. It
needs to let us run our networks in the best way possible. That means
everything from traffic shaping on our customer facing links, to
whatever traffic engineering policies we deem necessary to improve the
bottom line.

Also WISPS do need to be recognized (at a national level) as wireline
replacement. We should not be lumped in with the JOKE that is mobile
broadband ^H^H^H toy broadband.

 
 What makes content providers a better steward of Freedom than Access 
 providers?

Take a look at the supply chain sometime. The market will dictate self
regulation. It's only when people like Comcast get greedy and have a
monopoly, that things get nasty. At that point it is my opinion that the
market rapidly steps in and shuts out that player. ATT/Verizion/WISPS
should be aggressively targeting Comcast subscribers with much better
rates, and peering with L3/Netflix everywhere.

This is what an ASN and your own IP space buys you.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNCRuDAAoJEMvvG/TyLEAt9LEP/3bsR6dcyXUVBTGIF6kM++pA
5pg+vEqL0G5d6i+XR1DvDs+SlfILOfdSWsv3oRFSN/AHmopznq/2lB4AR/9SMqZs
fdntkaB2wiuQBbAFeZUhXxJkKo8i/3hFzFLfzKApfTA0I6NoD3uUpO4kbzLFjMsq
17SJAN2RX9RxhmNTayyPnpb4Fj+otX4/NukWMB2da04k6f04jP1ok5uuAQOFErMm
O6yi+KOVycp432LecNrVsHXwYHLdR0flpqfy8++SZ1M04aluUhCU8d8MUrU4Y96d

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Charles N Wyble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I use Proxmox and love it.

OpenVZ is the way to go. It's an amazing piece of software. Combine it
with Proxmox and you get everything VmWare offers for free.

On 12/15/2010 11:42 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
 Historically, RHEL\CentOS have used Xen.  I'm not sure if any other 
 methods are working their way into current releases.
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=zoVr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Justin Wilson
Xen has a higher learning curve than Vmware.  There is quite a bit of
documentation to help, but still has a curve.
-- 
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
Aol  Yahoo IM: j2sw
http://www.mtin.net/blog ­ xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw ­ Follow me on Twitter
Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support




From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:42:36 -0600
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

Historically, RHEL\CentOS have used Xen.  I'm not sure if any other
methods are working their way into current releases.

OpenVZ (managed through ProxMox) is a great way to host many
resource-lite containers.  There's only 2 - 3% overhead and they can
really add up low use servers.  If you're not using OpenVZ, I'd probably
go to VMWare.  They have a free version and you can migrate that to the
paid version when you're ready.  The paid version has all the fancy HA
and load balancing features.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 12/15/2010 12:07 PM, Matt wrote:
 Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support.  Dell
 support has been fantastic too.
 I think Redhat uses KVM?

 http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/

 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon.  How does it compare to VMware?


 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 


 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Josh Luthman
That's for premier.  You want partner, like an ISP.  Someone said like a
dollar forty?
On Dec 15, 2010 1:29 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote:
 On the Gmail...how cheap is cheap? They just quoted us $50 per user per
year
 (that's over $4/month per user JUST for email). That's pretty pricey to
me.
 People complain about the price of our software which does a ton of stuff
at
 less than $1/month/sub.

 Cameron

 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

  Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support.
Dell
  support has been fantastic too.

 I think Redhat uses KVM?

 http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/

 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon. How does it compare to
 VMware?





 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Andy Trimmell
Great thing about ESXi is that its footprint is so small. It uses like
300k of memory and you can run it from a USB thumbdrive and all the
storage is simply virtual machines.

 

EUREKA!

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

 

That's for premier.  You want partner, like an ISP.  Someone said like a
dollar forty?

On Dec 15, 2010 1:29 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote:
 On the Gmail...how cheap is cheap? They just quoted us $50 per user
per year
 (that's over $4/month per user JUST for email). That's pretty pricey
to me.
 People complain about the price of our software which does a ton of
stuff at
 less than $1/month/sub.
 
 Cameron
 
 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support.
Dell
  support has been fantastic too.

 I think Redhat uses KVM?

 http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/

 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon. How does it compare to
 VMware?






 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/





 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Colo contract language

2010-12-15 Thread Blake Bowers
Most tower owners will NOT give exclusives on frequency bands, prefering to 
go with FILO agreements in the lease for interference.  Basically anyone 
that comes on a tower after the first user cannot make interference - if 
they do they have to fix it or get off.


Don't take your organs to heaven,
heaven knows we need them down here!
Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today.

- Original Message - 
From: Richey myli...@battleop.com
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 1:21 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Colo contract language


 Does anyone have some language they can share on a colo agreement?  I've 
 got
 everything worked out except for exclusive use of the unlicensed bands at
 that site.   I want to prevent someone from renting space and parking 
 their
 gear on the same frequencies I am using.





 Richey

 AISG NetOps.









 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Jon Auer
RHEL/CentOS/Fedora switched from Xen to KVM

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote:
 Historically, RHEL\CentOS have used Xen.  I'm not sure if any other
 methods are working their way into current releases.

 OpenVZ (managed through ProxMox) is a great way to host many
 resource-lite containers.  There's only 2 - 3% overhead and they can
 really add up low use servers.  If you're not using OpenVZ, I'd probably
 go to VMWare.  They have a free version and you can migrate that to the
 paid version when you're ready.  The paid version has all the fancy HA
 and load balancing features.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 On 12/15/2010 12:07 PM, Matt wrote:
 Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support.  Dell
 support has been fantastic too.
 I think Redhat uses KVM?

 http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/

 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon.  How does it compare to 
 VMware?


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Glenn Kelley
I have found vmware to be a nightmare in many instances.
In others I absolutely love it. 

Check out the opensource project called ProxMox. 

It allows you to run containers as well as KVM instances - and has tons and 
tons of template machines (including the ability to use any VMWare one. 
http://proxmox.org/products/proxmox-ve

We have tons of templates from Cacti, WHMCS, cPanel, Zimbra, PRoxMox AntiSpam 
and others - well worth the testing 



On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Andy Trimmell wrote:

 Great thing about ESXi is that its footprint is so small. It uses like 300k 
 of memory and you can run it from a USB thumbdrive and all the storage is 
 simply virtual machines.
  
 EUREKA!
  
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Josh Luthman
 Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:55 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts
  
 That's for premier.  You want partner, like an ISP.  Someone said like a 
 dollar forty?
 
 On Dec 15, 2010 1:29 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote:
  On the Gmail...how cheap is cheap? They just quoted us $50 per user per year
  (that's over $4/month per user JUST for email). That's pretty pricey to me.
  People complain about the price of our software which does a ton of stuff at
  less than $1/month/sub.
  
  Cameron
  
  On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
  
   Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support. Dell
   support has been fantastic too.
 
  I think Redhat uses KVM?
 
  http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/
 
  Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon. How does it compare to
  VMware?
 
 
 
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

_
Glenn Kelley | Principal | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com 
  Email: gl...@hostmedic.com
Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Glenn Kelley
It is important to note KVM is actually part of the linux kernel. 
KVM stands for Kernel Virtual Machine
Since it is part of the kernel - it makes running it much more simple. 

Unlike Xen and others - (i like xen btw) - you do not need to worry about the 
kernel on an upgrade killing your ability to do virtulization as much as you 
would elsewhere

On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Jon Auer wrote:

 RHEL/CentOS/Fedora switched from Xen to KVM
 
 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net 
 wrote:
 Historically, RHEL\CentOS have used Xen.  I'm not sure if any other
 methods are working their way into current releases.
 
 OpenVZ (managed through ProxMox) is a great way to host many
 resource-lite containers.  There's only 2 - 3% overhead and they can
 really add up low use servers.  If you're not using OpenVZ, I'd probably
 go to VMWare.  They have a free version and you can migrate that to the
 paid version when you're ready.  The paid version has all the fancy HA
 and load balancing features.
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 
 On 12/15/2010 12:07 PM, Matt wrote:
 Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support.  Dell
 support has been fantastic too.
 I think Redhat uses KVM?
 
 http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/
 
 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon.  How does it compare to 
 VMware?
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

_
Glenn Kelley | Principal | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com 
  Email: gl...@hostmedic.com
Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Mike Hammett
The problem is that ProxMox has nowhere near the enterprise class 
feature set of VMWare.


Also, both KVM and OpenVZ have incompatibilities with certain Java 
applications.  Zimbra, for instance, on OpenVZ it has a memory bug and 
on KVM it has a CPU usage bug.


Personally, anyone who codes an email server in Java needs to meet the 
short end of a long rope.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 12/15/2010 2:08 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:

I have found vmware to be a nightmare in many instances.
In others I absolutely love it.

Check out the opensource project called ProxMox.

It allows you to run containers as well as KVM instances - and has 
tons and tons of template machines (including the ability to use any 
VMWare one.

http://proxmox.org/products/proxmox-ve

We have tons of templates from Cacti, WHMCS, cPanel, Zimbra, PRoxMox 
AntiSpam and others - well worth the testing




On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Andy Trimmell wrote:

Great thing about ESXi is that its footprint is so small. It uses 
like 300k of memory and you can run it from a USB thumbdrive and all 
the storage is simply virtual machines.

EUREKA!
*From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]*on 
Behalf Of*Josh Luthman

*Sent:*Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:55 PM
*To:*WISPA General List
*Subject:*Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

That's for premier.  You want partner, like an ISP.  Someone said 
like a dollar forty?


On Dec 15, 2010 1:29 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com 
mailto:cc...@wispmon.com wrote:
 On the Gmail...how cheap is cheap? They just quoted us $50 per user 
per year
 (that's over $4/month per user JUST for email). That's pretty 
pricey to me.
 People complain about the price of our software which does a ton of 
stuff at

 less than $1/month/sub.

 Cameron

 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com 
mailto:lm7...@gmail.com wrote:


  Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their 
support. Dell

  support has been fantastic too.

 I think Redhat uses KVM?

http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/

 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon. How does it compare to
 VMware?



 


 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 



 WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives:http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives:http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


_
*Glenn Kelley | Principal | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com *
Email: gl...@hostmedic.com mailto:gl...@hostmedic.com
Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Glenn Kelley
I have a zimbra setup and it runs just fine... 
not sure what you are seeing - but interesting to know... 

and yes - that short rope I think you are right.

On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 The problem is that ProxMox has nowhere near the enterprise class feature set 
 of VMWare.
 
 Also, both KVM and OpenVZ have incompatibilities with certain Java 
 applications.  Zimbra, for instance, on OpenVZ it has a memory bug and on KVM 
 it has a CPU usage bug.
 
 Personally, anyone who codes an email server in Java needs to meet the short 
 end of a long rope.
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 On 12/15/2010 2:08 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
 
 I have found vmware to be a nightmare in many instances.
 In others I absolutely love it. 
 
 Check out the opensource project called ProxMox. 
 
 It allows you to run containers as well as KVM instances - and has tons and 
 tons of template machines (including the ability to use any VMWare one. 
 http://proxmox.org/products/proxmox-ve
 
 We have tons of templates from Cacti, WHMCS, cPanel, Zimbra, PRoxMox 
 AntiSpam and others - well worth the testing 
 
 
 
 On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Andy Trimmell wrote:
 
 Great thing about ESXi is that its footprint is so small. It uses like 300k 
 of memory and you can run it from a USB thumbdrive and all the storage is 
 simply virtual machines.
  
 EUREKA!
  
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Josh Luthman
 Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:55 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts
  
 That's for premier.  You want partner, like an ISP.  Someone said like a 
 dollar forty?
 
 On Dec 15, 2010 1:29 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote:
  On the Gmail...how cheap is cheap? They just quoted us $50 per user per 
  year
  (that's over $4/month per user JUST for email). That's pretty pricey to 
  me.
  People complain about the price of our software which does a ton of stuff 
  at
  less than $1/month/sub.
  
  Cameron
  
  On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
  
   Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support. 
   Dell
   support has been fantastic too.
 
  I think Redhat uses KVM?
 
  http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/
 
  Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon. How does it compare to
  VMware?
 
 
 
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 _
 Glenn Kelley | Principal | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com 
   Email: gl...@hostmedic.com
 Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

_
Glenn Kelley | Principal | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com 
  Email: gl...@hostmedic.com
Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Mike Hammett
Java sees the memory of the entire host vs. just the container.  There 
is a myriad of config file changes to make it work, but I don't want to 
run a severely molested config.  It's just that much harder to 
troubleshoot when things are wrong.  It is a known issue between Java 
and OpenVZ, just no one seems able and willing to fix it.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 12/15/2010 2:26 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:

I have a zimbra setup and it runs just fine...
not sure what you are seeing - but interesting to know...

and yes - that short rope I think you are right.

On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

The problem is that ProxMox has nowhere near the enterprise class 
feature set of VMWare.


Also, both KVM and OpenVZ have incompatibilities with certain Java 
applications.  Zimbra, for instance, on OpenVZ it has a memory bug 
and on KVM it has a CPU usage bug.


Personally, anyone who codes an email server in Java needs to meet 
the short end of a long rope.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


On 12/15/2010 2:08 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:

I have found vmware to be a nightmare in many instances.
In others I absolutely love it.

Check out the opensource project called ProxMox.

It allows you to run containers as well as KVM instances - and has 
tons and tons of template machines (including the ability to use any 
VMWare one.

http://proxmox.org/products/proxmox-ve

We have tons of templates from Cacti, WHMCS, cPanel, Zimbra, PRoxMox 
AntiSpam and others - well worth the testing




On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Andy Trimmell wrote:

Great thing about ESXi is that its footprint is so small. It uses 
like 300k of memory and you can run it from a USB thumbdrive and 
all the storage is simply virtual machines.

EUREKA!
*From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]*on 
Behalf Of*Josh Luthman

*Sent:*Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:55 PM
*To:*WISPA General List
*Subject:*Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

That's for premier.  You want partner, like an ISP.  Someone said 
like a dollar forty?


On Dec 15, 2010 1:29 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com 
mailto:cc...@wispmon.com wrote:
 On the Gmail...how cheap is cheap? They just quoted us $50 per 
user per year
 (that's over $4/month per user JUST for email). That's pretty 
pricey to me.
 People complain about the price of our software which does a ton 
of stuff at

 less than $1/month/sub.

 Cameron

 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com 
mailto:lm7...@gmail.com wrote:


  Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their 
support. Dell

  support has been fantastic too.

 I think Redhat uses KVM?

http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/

 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon. How does it 
compare to

 VMware?



 


 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 



 WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives:http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives:http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


_
*Glenn Kelley | Principal | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com *
Email: gl...@hostmedic.com mailto:gl...@hostmedic.com
Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives:http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


_
*Glenn Kelley | Principal | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com *
Email: gl...@hostmedic.com mailto:gl...@hostmedic.com
Pplease don't 

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Glenn Kelley
gotcha using kvm here - but interesting.

Heck - i have opennms running in openvz and see none of those - so must be a 
zimbra deal. 

I am fighting some vmware issues now sadly - ready to pull the few hairs i have 
left out.
Wishing this was proxmox  ... 

resource issues - and resource pools not being followed ... 
fun 


On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 Java sees the memory of the entire host vs. just the container.  There is a 
 myriad of config file changes to make it work, but I don't want to run a 
 severely molested config.  It's just that much harder to troubleshoot when 
 things are wrong.  It is a known issue between Java and OpenVZ, just no one 
 seems able and willing to fix it.
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 On 12/15/2010 2:26 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
 
 I have a zimbra setup and it runs just fine... 
 not sure what you are seeing - but interesting to know... 
 
 and yes - that short rope I think you are right.
 
 On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
 
 The problem is that ProxMox has nowhere near the enterprise class feature 
 set of VMWare.
 
 Also, both KVM and OpenVZ have incompatibilities with certain Java 
 applications.  Zimbra, for instance, on OpenVZ it has a memory bug and on 
 KVM it has a CPU usage bug.
 
 Personally, anyone who codes an email server in Java needs to meet the 
 short end of a long rope.
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
 On 12/15/2010 2:08 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
 
 I have found vmware to be a nightmare in many instances.
 In others I absolutely love it. 
 
 Check out the opensource project called ProxMox. 
 
 It allows you to run containers as well as KVM instances - and has tons 
 and tons of template machines (including the ability to use any VMWare 
 one. 
 http://proxmox.org/products/proxmox-ve
 
 We have tons of templates from Cacti, WHMCS, cPanel, Zimbra, PRoxMox 
 AntiSpam and others - well worth the testing 
 
 
 
 On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Andy Trimmell wrote:
 
 Great thing about ESXi is that its footprint is so small. It uses like 
 300k of memory and you can run it from a USB thumbdrive and all the 
 storage is simply virtual machines.
  
 EUREKA!
  
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Josh Luthman
 Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:55 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts
  
 That's for premier.  You want partner, like an ISP.  Someone said like a 
 dollar forty?
 
 On Dec 15, 2010 1:29 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com wrote:
  On the Gmail...how cheap is cheap? They just quoted us $50 per user per 
  year
  (that's over $4/month per user JUST for email). That's pretty pricey to 
  me.
  People complain about the price of our software which does a ton of 
  stuff at
  less than $1/month/sub.
  
  Cameron
  
  On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
  
   Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support. 
   Dell
   support has been fantastic too.
 
  I think Redhat uses KVM?
 
  http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/
 
  Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon. How does it compare to
  VMware?
 
 
 
  
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 _
 Glenn Kelley | Principal | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com 
   Email: gl...@hostmedic.com
 Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Mike Hammett
oh, I had CPU usage issues.  Basic Zimbra LDAP server with nothing else 
attached would use 100% CPU.  It was some timing incompatibility.


I split Zimbra up into 7 separate servers for scale and redundancy (2x 
LDAP, 2x MTA, 2x mailstore, 1x proxy).


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 12/15/2010 2:36 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:

gotcha using kvm here - but interesting.

Heck - i have opennms running in openvz and see none of those - so 
must be a zimbra deal.


I am fighting some vmware issues now sadly - ready to pull the few 
hairs i have left out.

Wishing this was proxmox  ...

resource issues - and resource pools not being followed ...
fun


On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

Java sees the memory of the entire host vs. just the container.  
There is a myriad of config file changes to make it work, but I don't 
want to run a severely molested config.  It's just that much harder 
to troubleshoot when things are wrong.  It is a known issue between 
Java and OpenVZ, just no one seems able and willing to fix it.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


On 12/15/2010 2:26 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:

I have a zimbra setup and it runs just fine...
not sure what you are seeing - but interesting to know...

and yes - that short rope I think you are right.

On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

The problem is that ProxMox has nowhere near the enterprise class 
feature set of VMWare.


Also, both KVM and OpenVZ have incompatibilities with certain Java 
applications.  Zimbra, for instance, on OpenVZ it has a memory bug 
and on KVM it has a CPU usage bug.


Personally, anyone who codes an email server in Java needs to meet 
the short end of a long rope.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


On 12/15/2010 2:08 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:

I have found vmware to be a nightmare in many instances.
In others I absolutely love it.

Check out the opensource project called ProxMox.

It allows you to run containers as well as KVM instances - and has 
tons and tons of template machines (including the ability to use 
any VMWare one.

http://proxmox.org/products/proxmox-ve

We have tons of templates from Cacti, WHMCS, cPanel, Zimbra, 
PRoxMox AntiSpam and others - well worth the testing




On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Andy Trimmell wrote:

Great thing about ESXi is that its footprint is so small. It uses 
like 300k of memory and you can run it from a USB thumbdrive and 
all the storage is simply virtual machines.

EUREKA!
*From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]*on 
Behalf Of*Josh Luthman

*Sent:*Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:55 PM
*To:*WISPA General List
*Subject:*Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

That's for premier.  You want partner, like an ISP.  Someone said 
like a dollar forty?


On Dec 15, 2010 1:29 PM, Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com 
mailto:cc...@wispmon.com wrote:
 On the Gmail...how cheap is cheap? They just quoted us $50 per 
user per year
 (that's over $4/month per user JUST for email). That's pretty 
pricey to me.
 People complain about the price of our software which does a 
ton of stuff at

 less than $1/month/sub.

 Cameron

 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com 
mailto:lm7...@gmail.com wrote:


  Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their 
support. Dell

  support has been fantastic too.

 I think Redhat uses KVM?

http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/

 Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon. How does it 
compare to

 VMware?



 


 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 



 WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives:http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives:http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


_
*Glenn Kelley | Principal | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com *
Email: gl...@hostmedic.com mailto:gl...@hostmedic.com
Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Glenn Kelley
gotcha
have a few setup for a client - never saw that stuff @ all.

Might want to peek @ the kernel your using - 1.7 has a few updates that should 
help a ton.

Like anything - its always the little stuff :-)


On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 oh, I had CPU usage issues.  Basic Zimbra LDAP server with nothing else 
 attached would use 100% CPU.  It was some timing incompatibility.

_
Glenn Kelley | Principal | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com 
  Email: gl...@hostmedic.com
Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Matt
 http://www.ikano.com/vendor/googleapps-key-features_vendor.asp

 .35 cents a user a month. $4.20 a user per year.

I am hearing to switch to google all my users must change there SMTP
and POP3 settings to point at google.  Ugh, not gonna happen.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Chuck Hogg
Just change your DNS Settings for your domain name.  Did you think Google
was going to put a server in your facility?
Regards,

Chuck


On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

  http://www.ikano.com/vendor/googleapps-key-features_vendor.asp
 
  .35 cents a user a month. $4.20 a user per year.

 I am hearing to switch to google all my users must change there SMTP
 and POP3 settings to point at google.  Ugh, not gonna happen.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Justin Wilson
We just did a domain. We did a cname of the existing mail servers and
away they went.
-- 
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
Aol  Yahoo IM: j2sw
http://www.mtin.net/blog ­ xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw ­ Follow me on Twitter
Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support




From: Matt lm7...@gmail.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:03:35 -0600
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

 http://www.ikano.com/vendor/googleapps-key-features_vendor.asp

 .35 cents a user a month. $4.20 a user per year.

I am hearing to switch to google all my users must change there SMTP
and POP3 settings to point at google.  Ugh, not gonna happen.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Matt
 Just change your DNS Settings for your domain name.  Did you think Google
 was going to put a server in your facility?
 Regards,

Asked that, was told no.  Wanted to just use a cname to point at them.
 Don't think a cname is allowed on an MX though.  Wanted to use an
aname to just point at the google IP.  Was told no due to the SSL cert
or something.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Broken Dragonwave

2010-12-15 Thread Tim McNabb
You might also check with Surplus Wireless Gear. They've done repairs and such 
for us in the past, pretty good customer service too.

http://surpluswirelessgear.com/

-Tim

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 11:04 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Broken Dragonwave

Yes, there are more cost effective alternatives to repair, if you have time. 
First, there is a third party company that will repair your modems or sell you 
refurbished modems for your IDUs. I ran into one not to long ago, unfortuantely 
I forget who it was off the top of my head. (But I'll try to find out)

I'm assuming you have the Split archetecture models. What model do you have? I 
might have a resource for you.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message -
From: Kevin Sullivanmailto:kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net
To: WISPA General Listmailto:wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 5:43 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Broken Dragonwave

We bought a used Dragonwave link, and it appears that both ends have broken 
radio modems. Dragonwave wants $2,000 to replace each modem card assembly, for 
a total of $4k. Does anyone know what that is, and if it is possible to repair 
without paying Dragonwave unholy amounts of cash?

Thanks,
Kevin




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Broken Dragonwave

2010-12-15 Thread Kevin Sullivan
We have the AirPair 200 split system. Currently both the radio and modem are 
outdoor mountable, but we'd be fine with moving the modem indoors if needed.

Kevin
  - Original Message - 
  From: Tom DeReggi 
  To: WISPA General List 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 11:03 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] Broken Dragonwave


  Yes, there are more cost effective alternatives to repair, if you have time. 
First, there is a third party company that will repair your modems or sell you 
refurbished modems for your IDUs. I ran into one not to long ago, unfortuantely 
I forget who it was off the top of my head. (But I'll try to find out) 

  I'm assuming you have the Split archetecture models. What model do you have? 
I might have a resource for you.


  Tom DeReggi
  RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
  IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Sullivan 
To: WISPA General List 
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 5:43 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Broken Dragonwave


We bought a used Dragonwave link, and it appears that both ends have broken 
radio modems. Dragonwave wants $2,000 to replace each modem card assembly, for 
a total of $4k. Does anyone know what that is, and if it is possible to repair 
without paying Dragonwave unholy amounts of cash?

Thanks,
Kevin









WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--




  

  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  

   
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] content filtering as a premium service for subscribers

2010-12-15 Thread Optimum Wireless Services
I've used squidguard and has worked really well. I have a script that
updates the database every hour.


On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 11:23 -0500, Justin Wilson wrote:
WebSense is a good product.  The thing about any type of web
 filtering is you have to keep on top of it.   Companies such as
 Websense push out almost daily updates on new sites, false positives,
 etc.  If you “roll your own” be prepared to be writing exceptions a
 lot.  There are new web-sites everyday. Not only that you have new
 content everyday on exiting web-sites.  The example I always use is a
 site that goes into detail about breast cancer.  A simple solution may
 block the site one day, but not the next.  Depends on what the author
 of the web-site wrote that day.
 
 My .02 is pay someone who has dedicated staff to do it for you. 
 
 Justin
 -- 
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net 
 Aol  Yahoo IM: j2sw
 http://www.mtin.net/blog – xISP News
 http://www.twitter.com/j2sw – Follow me on Twitter
 Wisp Consulting – Tower Climbing – Network Support
 
 
 
 
 __
 From: Patrick D. Nix, Jr pni...@cnetworksolutions.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:12:38 -0600
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] content filtering as a premium service for
 subscribers
 
 Anyone offering web content filtering as a premium service to
 subscribers?  If so what have you found works best?  We’ve had a few
 requests, and are trying to see if it is worthwhile.
  
 Thanks,
  
 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager
 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net
 (918) 235-0414
   
 
 
 __
 
 
 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
 and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,
 please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this
 e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this
 information by a person other than the intended recipient is
 unauthorized and may be illegal.
 
 
 
 
 
 __
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

2010-12-15 Thread Kurt Fankhauser
Whats everyone paying price per meg for Time Warner dedicated internet
access here in Ohio?

 

 

 

-Kurt Fankhauser




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

2010-12-15 Thread Robert West
They seem to have an across the board 800 bucks or so for 10/10 and 1600 for
20/20Negotiable but not much.  All the statics you need included.

 

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:01 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

 

Whats everyone paying price per meg for Time Warner dedicated internet
access here in Ohio?

 

 

 

-Kurt Fankhauser




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

2010-12-15 Thread Rick Harnish
Are you operators in Ohio, wanting to do a State WISP meeting this winter?
If so, start a thread on the Ohio mailing list
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ohio .  The meeting in Indiana
http://www.wispa.org/?page_id=3434  is almost to capacity (80) with 74
signed up so far.

 

Rick

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 7:10 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

 

They seem to have an across the board 800 bucks or so for 10/10 and 1600 for
20/20Negotiable but not much.  All the statics you need included.

 

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:01 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

 

Whats everyone paying price per meg for Time Warner dedicated internet
access here in Ohio?

 

 

 

-Kurt Fankhauser




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

2010-12-15 Thread Robert West
I'd be up for that.

 

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 7:18 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

 

Are you operators in Ohio, wanting to do a State WISP meeting this winter?
If so, start a thread on the Ohio mailing list
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ohio .  The meeting in Indiana
http://www.wispa.org/?page_id=3434  is almost to capacity (80) with 74
signed up so far.

 

Rick

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 7:10 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

 

They seem to have an across the board 800 bucks or so for 10/10 and 1600 for
20/20Negotiable but not much.  All the statics you need included.

 

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:01 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

 

Whats everyone paying price per meg for Time Warner dedicated internet
access here in Ohio?

 

 

 

-Kurt Fankhauser




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Chuck Hogg
We converted 2500 accounts...1-2 weeks of calls about turning on ssl...

Regards,
Chuck

On Dec 15, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just change your DNS Settings for your domain name.  Did you think Google
 was going to put a server in your facility?
 Regards,
 
 Asked that, was told no.  Wanted to just use a cname to point at them.
 Don't think a cname is allowed on an MX though.  Wanted to use an
 aname to just point at the google IP.  Was told no due to the SSL cert
 or something.
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] FW: [WISPA Members] Open Internet Update

2010-12-15 Thread Rick Harnish
This just in from WISPA's attorney Steve Coran.  We ended up with 120
filings.  Good Job to all those that voiced your opinions.

 

From: members-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:members-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Stephen Coran
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 7:34 PM
To: memb...@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA Members] Open Internet Update

 

Yesterday, I was asked by a member if the FCC bothers to read the letters
that are submitted to them in rulemaking proceedings.  Today, I can tell you
that they do.  More specifically, I can tell you that WISPA's letters in the
Open Internet proceeding have created a positive impact.

 

At about 5:30 this evening, I received a phone call from Julius Knapp, Chief
of the FCC's Office of Engineering  Technology, and Zach Katz, Chairman
Genachowski's point person on the open Internet proceeding.  I don't ever
recall receiving a call from the FCC Chairman's office on these sorts of
matters, much less one beginning beginning with we've noticed that there
are quite a few letters that WISPs have written.  Because we are in the
quiet period where we can't advocate positions, my job was listen and take
notes.  Here's what I heard:

 

First, the rules the Chairman hopes to adopt (remember, he needs three
votes) should not require providers to make significant changes in their
network management practices.  The language in the draft Order will
acknowledge that reasonable network management should be a flexible
definition.  More to the point, the language in the draft Order recognizes
the unique challenges that unlicensed fixed users face, i.e., the fact
that they have no assured access to spectrum and do not control the
spectrum.  Zach said more than once that the rules the Chairman hopes to
adopt are a beginning and not an end and future changes will be made as the
competitive landscape evolves.  As Zach said -- with a nod to Julie for
being our inside guy (my words) -- the WISP community is not being
ignored. 

 

Second, the draft rules will distinguish between fixed and mobile networks.
Mobile is at an earlier stage than fixed and is evolving more rapidly based
on business models and relationships with content and application providers.
Zach also mentioned that open networks are evolving (e.g., 700 MHz C-block).
He emphasized that the rules the FCC adopts will stay constant for a long
period of time and that the FCC will monitor the marketplace.

 

The takeaways:

- While I can't say that the draft Order is different than it was last
week, our advocacy campaign was effective enough to be noticed by Julie such
that he contacted the Chairman's office and the Chairman's office called me.
Its important for you, the members, to know that your voices were heard and
will have an impact in this important proceeding

- The draft Order acknowledges the unique challenges that WISPs face
with respect to restrictions on bandwidth use.  Not all fixed networks are
the same.  That was one of our messages.

- The draft Order will provide for flexibility in the way WISPs (and
others) manage networks.  Again, that was a key point in our letters.

- Our previous and fairly frequent contacts with Julie have made him a
WISP advocate within the FCC with some degree of influence with the
Chairman's office.

 

Guess we are seeing how sausage is made, and looks like we are part of it.
Though there are a lot of details we don't yet know, for now its nice to
know that our collective brainpower and hard work can be effective.

 

More as I hear it.

 

Stephen E. Coran

Rini Coran, PC

1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036

202.463.4310 - voice

202.669.3288 - cell

202.296.2014 - fax

 mailto:sco...@rinicoran.com sco...@rinicoran.com - e-mail

www.rinicoran.com http://www.rinicoran.com/ 

www.telecommunicationslaw.com http://www.telecommunicationslaw.com/ 

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and
may be protected by legal privilege.  If you are not the intended recipient,
be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this e-mail
or any attachment is prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and deleting or
destroying the e-mail and any attachments without retaining any copies.
Thank you for your cooperation.

 

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed
by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this
communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be
used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under
the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any matter addressed herein.

 

 

 

___

WISPA Membership Mailing List

---


WISPA 

Re: [WISPA] Email Accounts

2010-12-15 Thread Scott Carullo
If the disk space requirements allow go buy some large SSD Intel drives and 
your disk IO problem will likely go away.

I don't buy anything but SSD any more unless I can't fit what I need on 
one.  We have a larger one I put in our mail server and its not a fast 
machine but the performance of the SSD made up for it then some.  Just a 
thought...

Scott Carullo
Technical Operations
855-FLSPEED x102



From: Matt lm7...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 10:36 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Email Accounts

Our current email server is getting a bit over loaded.  Disk I/O is
getting to be an issue on it.  Hosting about 2000 accounts.  Likely
just going to move current solution to a bigger and newer RAID array.
Before I do that thought I would ask what other solutions are out
there?  Prefer to keep it in house and keep costs down.  Current
solution actually works ok just such a pain whenever it needs
upgraded.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

2010-12-15 Thread Kurt Fankhauser
Really? Guess I shouldn't complain when they sold me the 30/30 for $1600
then, I was trying to get the 50/50 and so far they are only coming down to
about $2300 for it.

 

  _  

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 7:10 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

 

They seem to have an across the board 800 bucks or so for 10/10 and 1600 for
20/20Negotiable but not much.  All the statics you need included.

 

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:01 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

 

Whats everyone paying price per meg for Time Warner dedicated internet
access here in Ohio?

 

 

 

-Kurt Fankhauser




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

2010-12-15 Thread Robert West
Hey, that's good to know!  They may be adjusting their pricing.

 

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:26 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

 

Really? Guess I shouldn't complain when they sold me the 30/30 for $1600
then, I was trying to get the 50/50 and so far they are only coming down to
about $2300 for it.

 

  _  

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 7:10 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

 

They seem to have an across the board 800 bucks or so for 10/10 and 1600 for
20/20Negotiable but not much.  All the statics you need included.

 

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:01 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

 

Whats everyone paying price per meg for Time Warner dedicated internet
access here in Ohio?

 

 

 

-Kurt Fankhauser




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

2010-12-15 Thread Robert West
I'm still trying to find a factory in China that manufactures cheap
bandwidth.  Then I'll import it and make a killing!

 

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:26 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

 

Really? Guess I shouldn't complain when they sold me the 30/30 for $1600
then, I was trying to get the 50/50 and so far they are only coming down to
about $2300 for it.

 

  _  

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 7:10 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

 

They seem to have an across the board 800 bucks or so for 10/10 and 1600 for
20/20Negotiable but not much.  All the statics you need included.

 

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:01 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

 

Whats everyone paying price per meg for Time Warner dedicated internet
access here in Ohio?

 

 

 

-Kurt Fankhauser




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg

2010-12-15 Thread Josh Luthman
40 megs for $2100 here

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373



On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Kurt Fankhauser li...@wavelinc.com wrote:
 Really? Guess I shouldn’t complain when they sold me the 30/30 for $1600
 then, I was trying to get the 50/50 and so far they are only coming down to
 about $2300 for it.



 

 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Robert West
 Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 7:10 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg



 They seem to have an across the board 800 bucks or so for 10/10 and 1600 for
 20/20    Negotiable but not much.  All the statics you need included.







 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
 Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:01 PM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: [WISPA] Time Warner fiber OHIO price per meg



 Whats everyone paying price per meg for Time Warner dedicated internet
 access here in Ohio?







 -Kurt Fankhauser


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Colo contract language

2010-12-15 Thread Richey
The site owner is verbally ok with such language so we are going to put it
in.  One of the companies we compete in another market does the same thing
with their leases.  

Richey

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blake Bowers
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Colo contract language

Most tower owners will NOT give exclusives on frequency bands, prefering to 
go with FILO agreements in the lease for interference.  Basically anyone 
that comes on a tower after the first user cannot make interference - if 
they do they have to fix it or get off.


Don't take your organs to heaven,
heaven knows we need them down here!
Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today.

- Original Message - 
From: Richey myli...@battleop.com
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 1:21 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Colo contract language


 Does anyone have some language they can share on a colo agreement?  I've 
 got
 everything worked out except for exclusive use of the unlicensed bands at
 that site.   I want to prevent someone from renting space and parking 
 their
 gear on the same frequencies I am using.





 Richey

 AISG NetOps.













 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Should USF Funds be used for broadband in areas that already support private sector investment?

2010-12-15 Thread Brian Webster
My second attempt at a blog. This time I look at what threshold already
supports private sector broadband systems and pose the thought that USF fund
reform should not go to areas that fit that criteria. That criteria can
easily be determined now. Check out the sample chart.

 

http://brianwebsterconsulting.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/should-usf-funds-be-u
sed-for-broadband-in-areas-that-already-support-private-sector-investment/

 



Thank You,

Brian Webster

 http://www.wirelessmapping.com www.wirelessmapping.com

www.Broadband-Mapping.com

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] What is this?

2010-12-15 Thread Blake Bowers
DELL POWEREDGE 2161DS 16-PORT KVM IP SWITCH 2161-DS

I just found one of these literally laying here.  Can anyone tell a 
technology impaired person what it is?   Is it still something of value?


Don't take your organs to heaven,
heaven knows we need them down here!
Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] What is this?

2010-12-15 Thread Blake Covarrubias
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KVM_switch

If you consider the above to be of value, then yes.

If you don't want it, I do.

--
Blake Covarrubias

On Dec 15, 2010, at 22:16, Blake Bowers bbow...@mozarks.com wrote:

 DELL POWEREDGE 2161DS 16-PORT KVM IP SWITCH 2161-DS
 
 I just found one of these literally laying here.  Can anyone tell a 
 technology impaired person what it is?   Is it still something of value?
 
 
 Don't take your organs to heaven,
 heaven knows we need them down here!
 Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today.
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/