Re: [WISPA] Virtual AP
If you have a competitor on a nearby tower who is uncooperative with you on channel coordination or whatever, I could see this as a way to goof with your competitor, by having his clients associate with you instead, and flood their technical support lines with calls. Having the virtual AP only run from 3:30pm to 4:30pm every other Monday could really make things fun for them to figure out. Thats a mean thing to do, and I would never recommend that anyone do unto others as they wouldn't have done to them. If a competitor goes broke and pulls the plug on his AP, this could REALLY be benificial, as you could advertise on the hotspot signin screen that there will be no setup fee for former brandX clients. If you turn on universal client, you might pick up a customer who sees your tower better than your competitor. About as underhanded and unethical as callforwarding his sales line to yours, but Pete Davis NoDial.net John Scrivner wrote: Short of frustrating potential customers I cannot fathom what positive effect this process has. Please enlighten me how this is a good thing to do. Scriv Kurt Fankhauser wrote: I do that too, 3 competitors have towers all within ¼ mile of each other, I put their ssid in my AP but turn the broadcast off, their clients associate to me and I deny all their access so when they try to hook up customers it looks like their connected but they cant figure out why it doesn’t work, keeps them from signing up clients in my area. Kurt Fankhauser WAVELINC 114 S. Walnut St. Bucyrus, OH 44820 419-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com -Original Message- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Rick Smith *Sent:* Tuesday, December 27, 2005 8:12 AM *To:* 'WISPA General List' *Subject:* RE: [WISPA] Virtual AP actually, I was kidding about the competitor thing, wanted to see if it'd start a fire. It's something I'd thought of, but you can't route based on Virtual AP SSID Having an invididual hotspot page per virtual SSID would be cool, on a wholesale level... *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Scott Reed *Sent:* Tuesday, December 27, 2005 10:44 AM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* RE: [WISPA] Virtual AP What happens when a potential customer sees the competition's name? They call the competitor who says, We don't do that. Then what, do you get called by the competitor? I guess my question is, how does advertising the competitor's name help you? I like the wholesale idea though. I may have to pursue that in the future. Scott Reed Owner NewWays Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration www.nwwnet.net http://www.nwwnet.net/ The season is Christmas, not X-mas, not the holiday, but Christmas, because Christ was born to provide salvation to all who will believe! *-- Original Message ---* From: Rick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:15:08 -0500 Subject: RE: [WISPA] Virtual AP Yep, I create virtual SSIDs for all my competitors names (they only do DSL) :) I also wholesale service off one of my towers via 2.4 and 900 mhz to a local computer guy that likes to see his name in the air - the virtual SSID thing was a natural win... Not sure about the broadcast thing...haven't seen a performance hit because of the virtual ssid's ... R -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete Davis Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 9:57 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Virtual AP Mikrotik APs have the capability to create a Virtual AP with a secondary SSID, but I haven't found much documentation about it. Has anyone used this feature much? I could see this being useful during a transitional period, while you are changing the SSID, so you can access the CPE with the old ssid. I could also see this being useful for colocating two companies on the same tower/AP, like if you have an ISP geared toward residential service, and another company name/marketing scheme for business customers. I don't know what kind of performance impact there is when you create a bunch of APs on one radio. I had a wierd thought about this, however: If I have 40 clients on an AP, and set up 40 virtual AP's on the network with each client on his own SSID, do they count as 40 PTP links, allowing me to kick up the antenna gain like with the CPE? Does the virtual AP really broadcast a secondary SSID, or does it switch between the two rapidly, kind of like a poor man's Time Division Multiplexing. Pete Davis NoDial.net -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked
Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Networks Reveals Prototype902-928MHzMini-PCICard
With all of the current 900mhz AP's and CPE out there currently a closed/proprietary system (not an 802.x open standard) for the handshaking, security, ack/nack, etc, I am curious if/how Mikrotik, StarOS, Windows, or whoever will talk to them. Has all of that programming been worked out? They won't actually be able to associate with an existing Waverider, Proxim, Trango, Tranzeo, or Alvarion, or whatever AP/CPE will they? I would assume not. I would love to deploy a 900Mhz system where I am not locked into a single source hardware providor. Open standards avoid things like getting stuck with things like Karlnet or whoever when they go out of business. If Mikrotik were to make a proprietary standard, it would be a shame (although waiting on IEEE might not be effective/appropriate), but Mikrotik is not going anywhere IMO, and its affordable enough. pd Eje Gustafsson wrote: They just finished their 6th prototype and found out some issues with the current Atheros chipsets in regards to adjustable frequency selection. They are looking at making a new prototype with the latest chipset. The cards where not estimated to be available and ready until around Jan/Feb and more then likely your not going to see any cards until Feb at this point since they have to redesign them a bit. But it's all for the better. / Eje WISP-Router, Inc Ubiquiti Distributor -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blair Davis Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 9:32 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Networks Reveals Prototype902-928MHzMini-PCICard Anyone heard anything more about these 900MHz mini-PCI cards from Ubiquiti? Their web site doesn't seem to mention them IMHO, their web site is useless -- Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote: OK, talking about all of the ways that Trango has to fine tune the radios has me thinking. I've got two systems that I'm having some trouble with. Both are low to the ground and I'm sure I'm seeing multipath. GREAT speed tests radio to radio but poor data rates and high error rates (5% most of the time). Still much better than the wifi it's replaced but it needs to be better. I don't know the cli on these radios and don't have the time, desire or need to learn. I do need some help from someone that knows them insideout. Anyone need an hour or two of consulting to help me get these two systems polished up so that they run at full speed? thanks, Marlon (509) 982-2181 Equipment sales (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services 42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp! 64.146.146.12 (net meeting) www.odessaoffice.com/wireless www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam - Original Message - From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 6:52 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Networks Reveals Prototype902-928MHzMini-PCICard JohnnyO, When you can tell me you've installed In this type of noisy environment Of course every environment is different. But We have with great success with Trango. Try colocating right next to qty 5 - 929Mhz 500 watt OMNIs, and the same horizontal plain in Urban america with -60db RSSIs from them, -30db RSSIs on the top channel. Feel free to share one technical reason why the Canopy is capable of dealing with interference better than Trango. (other than personal experience, because that can not be verified or accurately debated). My guess is in your environment, you weren't taking advantage of Trango's flexibility and using the best polarity for the job. I find most noise, such as from SCADA systems, are on verticle polarity, very easy to combat with a radio like Trango that supports horizontal pol antennas on the fly. You probably were using omnis or testing with Trango default antennas. Try matching up Trango w/ Tiltek Horizontal sector w/ their convenient ext antenna port on all APs and CPEs capable to add narrow beam Yagis. Trango has 3 ways to combat interference. 1- dual pol switchable, 2- dynamic leveling to compress out noise, 3- ARQ The choice for 900 Mhz radios is florishing right now, all very high grade radios (WaveRider, Alvarion, Tranmgo, Canopy, AirSpan, WaveIP). All have their own little unique benefits that make them special. Alvarion- Mobile. WaveRider- Dual Polarity Diverity. Trango- Dual Pol switchable + ARQ + great diag tools. Canopy- easy interface w/ diag statistic for Jitter and such. But as far as surviving noise, not confident that Canopy shines in that territory above Trango. I just don't believe it. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: JohnnyO [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 9:08 PM Subject: RE:
Re: [WISPA] WISPA and volunteers
I think the Limited Business Interruption is where if the company makes 10k/mo, and you are down for a month because of a fire, lightning, etc, the policy pays you $10k. The Fungi Limited Business Interruption, is posibly an exclusion or an inclusion in the event that you have mold in your building that needs to be eradicated, causing revenue loss. Some policies specifically exclude fungi stuff, because its debatable how much of a health risk it REALLY is, and its also often tied to water damage, which may or may not be covered in building insurance plans. Its also hard to prove that the building had no mold when the policy started, since ALL buildings have some mold in them. pd Dylan Oliver wrote: I'm interested in group insurance. Been talking to United (through wispinsurance.com http://wispinsurance.com) and could use better rates .. this is what we've been offered: $2,128 general liability property + $700 umbrella + $250 program administration charges + $1,250 professional EO (optional) + $250 EO administration charges (optional) + $250 Healthy Safety Manual (maybe optional). The coverage includes two tower locations with $50k and a premium of $585. And what is Fungi Limited Business Interruption? In case I eat a quarter of mushrooms and trip balls for a month? Best, -- Dylan Oliver Primaverity, LLC -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Alvarion just made Cramers BUY list.
For the record, I like Jim Cramer, and listen to him when I can. I don't always see things as sunshin-ey or as cloudy as he does. to quote Cramer in Yahoo finance: Cramer is bullish on Israeli wireless broadband connectivity company Alvarion (ALVR:Nasdaq - commentary - research - Cramer's Take) as a play on the expected growth in WiMax. WiMax, said Cramer, could be huge as it has a range of 30 miles as opposed to WiFi, which is measured in feet. Alvarion has made a profit in just two years of its 10-year history, though, said Cramer. But, at $7.67 -- where the stock closed Thursday -- the stock is cheap, he said. Cramer believes that Alvarion's stock has bottomed and that the catalyst for the stock to move higher should come early next year when industry standards for WiMax are expected to be decided upon. Asked about the possibility of Alvarion getting acquired, Cramer said he never speculates on takeovers when a company's earnings are declining. He is "playing it for the earnings, and they've got to come back." I don't know what makes Alvarion's wimax [not released yet] entry into the market any better than the wimax product offerings from every other [not released yet] entry into the market. Kind of a funny thing to speculate on, and talking to ANY manufacturer, you get the impression that THEY have the Wimax market wrapped up just as soon as they start shipping, since Wimax will offer us 30 mile NLOS 400Gbps $40CPE etc etc. Manufacturing problems, marketing problems, pricing problems etc may all fly in the face of ANY manufacturer. I am not trying to downplay Alvarion's products, strategies, or company, but I don't know about risking my hard earned money on a non-shipping product line. On the other hand, $8 is probably cheap for this company. Just incase I have missed something... has anyone actually shipped a Wimax compliant product? Is the Wimax standard been ratified? I kind of tuned out the hype about a year ago, and havent really been following it. Pete Davis NoDial.net George wrote: Congradts to anyone who owns Alvarion stock. You'll see a nice bunp tomorrow. George -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Anyone (or everyone) else getting spam from AdZilla?
Butch Evans wrote: On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Pete Davis. NoDial.net wrote: What the heck is this?? Is anyone else out there partnering with these spammers? I replied and told them that we don't do business I did not get an email like that (or the Barracuda caught it). Please post a name so that I can be sure to not do business with them anyway. Thanks. Here is the total email, including the headers: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 74094 invoked by uid 1013); 31 Oct 2005 21:48:28 - Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by s2.NoDial.net by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.65. spamassassin: 2.60. Clear:RC:0(69.20.58.226):SA:0(0.0/6.5):. Processed in 2.854998 secs); 31 Oct 2005 21:48:28 - X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=6.5 Received: from unknown (HELO server45.appriver.com) (69.20.58.226) by 64-123-108-2.ded.swbell.net with SMTP; 31 Oct 2005 21:48:25 - Received: from [69.20.58.237] (HELO server52.appriver.com) by server45.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 319869339; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:43:21 -0500 Received: from mail.adzilla.com [209.17.141.200] by server52.appriver.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.15) id AFF5990A006C; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:43:17 -0500 Received: from [192.168.4.193] (unknown [192.168.4.193]) by mail.adzilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0577085; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:41:05 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:43:19 -0800 Subject: Business Partnership with NoDial.net From: Martin Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thread-Topic: Business Partnership with NoDial.net Thread-Index: AcXeZBuJWkSLMkpXEdqjlwARJHyOvg== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary=B_3213611000_26892301 X-Note: Spam-Tests-Failed: None X-Note-WHTLIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Note-Reverse-DNS: h209-17-141-200.gtconnect.net X-Note-Sending-IP: 209.17.141.200 X-Country-Path: CANADA-destination This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3213611000_26892301 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Hello Pete, I noticed one of your recent postings on WISPA list and thought that I would introduce myself to you and find out if you have some time to learn how our services help ISPs increasing the Average Revenue earned per End-User. =20 My organization is developing strategic partnerships with ISPs around North America and I would like to present our unique revenue sharing business proposition to your company. We had a very successful show at ISPCON where we met up with many existing and potential partners. I have a presentation that I=B9d like to run through with you that outlines our history and value propositions, our technology and its applications and the potential revenue earned and cost savings achieved by ISPs becoming a partner with Adzilla. I hope to be able to talk with you soon. Respectfully, Martin Stewart Regional Account Director - Network Group Adzilla New Media Direct: 604.628.4369 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Anyone (or everyone) else getting spam from AdZilla?
I just got an email that was apparently based on my posting to wispa list. Hello Pete, I noticed one of your recent postings on WISPA list and thought that I would introduce myself to you and find out if you have some time to learn how our services help ISPs increasing the Average Revenue earned per End-User. blah blah blah What the heck is this?? Is anyone else out there partnering with these spammers? I replied and told them that we don't do business with those who contact me unsolicited, and unless they come HIGHLY recommended by another ISP, I won't be contacting them. According to their website, they help kill viruses and spyware by delivering filtered ads. Can anyone tell me if these guys are legit. The whole thing seems goofy to me. Am I missing something? Pete Davis NoDial.net -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Senao Question
All prices from wisp-router.com. You may find better prices elsewhere, but Eje's usually seem to be in line. 2611 CB3 Deluxe = $94.83 (qty 24) PacWireless Rootenna = RT24-14 = $36.90 (qty 25) UML (Satellite Arm) = $13.45 A 3 inch piece of Velcro tape holds in in just fine. They seem to handle 100 degree + days in South Texas without any problem. I don't think I have had any fail due to heat or cold. It got down to the teens last winter. Pete Davis NoDial.net Brian Rohrbacher wrote: Pete, Will you list out all the parts and prices of this 200mw CPE? Is this outdoor, POE? It is kind a build your own? What temperatures is this operation in? Brian George wrote: Pete Davis. NoDial.net wrote: I like the features of the Tranzeos, the Smartbridges, etc etc, but at $100 more per CPE, my 200 2611 clients would have cost me $20k more. If anyone can tell me another way to get a 36db POE client for less than $150 PLEASE contact me off list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I learned that the hard way. Pete Davis NoDial.net Well I would say that Teletronics EZ Bridges were good. I have 500 +/- of them. And they have a 200MW version. But lately, I've been getting some bad ones in my orders. The 100mw pcb kit is 100.00 or so and the 200mw is 125.00 or so. But I would caution buyer beware, since buying the pcb only version and not the full fledges outdoor unit, I've noticed a lot of doa''s and unstable units. Will be nice when StarVX Lonnie gets his single radio cpe. I understand it may be in the price range you mentioned. George -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Senao Question
I got them from wisp-router.com but I don't think they carry them anymore. pd Dylan Oliver wrote: Pete, Where do you buy these EZ-Y bridges? -- Dylan Oliver Primaverity, LLC -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Senao Question
The 3054's suck. If you can keep them airconditioned, they might stay up for you for a while, but they SEEM to bee overly sensitive to heat. I have a 3054 that I use for my kid's bedroom PC, one for my PC workbench, and a few other locations where I could probably get by with a USB adapter, but since I bought 24 of these POS's, I use them wherever I have a NON mission-critical application, or stuff like that. I once plugged in 10 of them around the house. and associated them all to a Linksys router, and pinged all of them for a week without a failure. In a test environment I don't think I have ever had one fail, but in the field, they seem to spontanieously crap out. A cheap WDS alternative is a EZ-Y net bridges. I have one on a roof with an omni, about two miles from a MTik AP and associated in WDS mode, and it seems to work well to fill in the blanks for nearby customers. Pete Davis NoDial.net 361.277.FAST Dylan Oliver wrote: Speaking of Senao ... I just ran across some really nasty reviews of the nl-3054 CB3+. My client wants to share a cable connection at one house with two others with LOS and within 100ft. Sounds easy enough, but those reviews (worst product ever) have me looking again elsewhere. But nothing else seems to offer WPA. The 802.11g is nice, but could pass. Anyone have anything decent to say about these? Best, -- Dylan Oliver Primaverity, LLC -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Senao Question
What I have experienced is that 30% or better is usually a solid signal quality. 15% or better is usually a solid signal strength. I have never figured out a % to dbm translation. The web-only non-snmp interface is my least favorite thing about 2611 CB3 Deluxes. My most favorite thing about them is the price. 2611's inside rootennas are my typical installation. With all hardware and mounting brackets, masts, etc, I am laying out less than $200 per install, and paying the installer contractor $125.. I have around 200 deployed like what you are describing. I have almost 100 more clients with different CPE. I like the features of the Tranzeos, the Smartbridges, etc etc, but at $100 more per CPE, my 200 2611 clients would have cost me $20k more. If anyone can tell me another way to get a 36db POE client for less than $150 PLEASE contact me off list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] A note of caution/education to pass along to anyone implementing the rootenna/cb3 combination: If the rootenna is one of the revisions that doesn't have a grounding clip to pull out [to make contact with the back bracket] put in a ground wire from the front to the back, and ground the pole. Un-Grounded, the static discharge from a nearby lightning will often leave the 2511 radio card [inside the 2611 bridge] in a in-sensitive state. I learned that the hard way. Pete Davis NoDial.net Jason wrote: Guys ( gals), Has anyone worked with the Senao 2611 Deluxe Plus/Rootenna combo? How do you interpret the Communications Quality % and the Signal Strength % values? What are some typical numbers that you like to see/know will work (maybe break it down by thru-put)? Right now I have an 8 mile link with 28% quality and 16% signal strength. It's sticking to 11Mbits/sec, but I have no way to test the throughput at the moment. Jason -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] TV Interference
I had the same thing recently. I raised the rootenna above the TV antenna, and the white dots went away. Pete Davis NoDial.net Scott Reed wrote: OK, I have dealt with TV interference before, but this one has me stumped. Installed customer 4 weeks ago. All is fine. Over last week, signal strenght started degrading. Customer complained about speed slowdown. Customer was out of town for weekend but we went out Saturday and RSSI was really bad. Did some testing. Replaced 15dB antenna with a 19. Raised about 4. Signal strength improved dramatically. Customer came home Sunday and there were dots/lines in channels 2 and 5. Channel 7 works fine. The 2 7 transmitters are not far from each other. Unplugged radio and dots/lines went away. Plugged it back in, dots/lines. So, why only channels below 7 and why only with the new antenna? Scott Reed Owner NewWays Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration www.nwwnet.net http://www.nwwnet.net/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Satellite Anyone?
The high latency of satelite based internet makes it un-friendly for VOIP, VPN, online gaming, etc. The slow upload speed that is usually offered doesn't make it very friendly for much else. I have considered getting one to redirect P2P traffic to in order to free up T1's. Pete Davis NoDial.net David A. Browning wrote: I use satellite in my mobile wireless distribution trailers. With commercial grade accounts the bandwidth is decent, but the inherent latency makes VOIP typically unusable. You of course notice some delay on the click through items as well, but what do you expect for a signal that has to travel 50,000 miles round trip? There are better systems than Direcway, but the equipment costs are ten times more. Direcway's systems are based on TV signal and data has to be converted in the transition, others are based off data signals only have far lower latency. Thanks! David A. Browning Advanced Wireless Networks (541) 280-5834 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 7:29 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Satellite Anyone? It's common outside the US as there are often not good connections to even the largest cities in many countries. In the US I've heard of it being done. Usually the costs are much higher and the performance lower than lan based systems (for $300 to $400 per month you can get a 5 year lease on a LOT of high end backhaul gear and cover many tens of miles). laters, Marlon (509) 982-2181 Equipment sales (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services 42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp! 64.146.146.12 (net meeting) www.odessaoffice.com/wireless www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam - Original Message - From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 10:25 PM Subject: [WISPA] Satellite Anyone? Hello everyone, Has anyone successfully used satellite (ie, Directway 7700 or similar) as their source of upstream bandwidth? If so or if not, why? How did it turn out? Any suggestions? T1's are hard to come by here, and I'm still shopping for alternatives. Jason Wallace WISP Startup in AZ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.1/104 - Release Date: 9/16/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.1/104 - Release Date: 9/16/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
