Re: [WISPA] OSPF on RouterOS Vritual AP
Ahh, are you distributing connected routes? If not, then until something connects, won't do anything :) * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: Nothing associated on the Virtual. The propagation was back out via the wire interface. I would not think it should matter if anything is connected. The interface is active, it has an address. That address range should be propagated by OSPF. I will be at the site tomorrow. I will connect to the VirtualAP and see if that matters. Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote: Is something connected to the VAP? Why would it send if its on the physical unless the other end is connected to the physical ap vs the vap. * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: Yep, that is what I said in the original post. Put the IP on the VirtualAP and no route prorogation. Put it on the physical and it propagates. So the question is, why does the route not propagate from the VirtualAP? And is that corrected in v3.x? I assumed the VirtualAP was just like any other interface, put maybe not. I may try putting it in a bridge and addressing the bridge to see what happens. Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote: A virtual AP is another interface, so unless its bridged with something else, it will have to have an IP to communicate! * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: I have tried to setup OSPF on a Virtual AP in 2.9.49. I have not found a way to get it to forward the route. As soon as I put the address on the physical interface, the route propagates. Any one know if this can be made to work? If I upgrade to 3.23 or higher will it work? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives:
[WISPA] OSPF on RouterOS Vritual AP
I have tried to setup OSPF on a Virtual AP in 2.9.49. I have not found a way to get it to forward the route. As soon as I put the address on the physical interface, the route propagates. Any one know if this can be made to work? If I upgrade to 3.23 or higher will it work? -- Scott Reed Sr. Systems Engineer GAB Midwest 1-800-363-1544 x4000 Cell: 260-273-7239 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] OSPF on RouterOS Vritual AP
I'd upgrade, and start there. If I remember right, there were a lot of routing changes in 3.x. On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Scott Reed scottr...@onlyinternet.netwrote: I have tried to setup OSPF on a Virtual AP in 2.9.49. I have not found a way to get it to forward the route. As soon as I put the address on the physical interface, the route propagates. Any one know if this can be made to work? If I upgrade to 3.23 or higher will it work? -- Scott Reed Sr. Systems Engineer GAB Midwest 1-800-363-1544 x4000 Cell: 260-273-7239 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] OSPF on RouterOS Vritual AP
A virtual AP is another interface, so unless its bridged with something else, it will have to have an IP to communicate! * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: I have tried to setup OSPF on a Virtual AP in 2.9.49. I have not found a way to get it to forward the route. As soon as I put the address on the physical interface, the route propagates. Any one know if this can be made to work? If I upgrade to 3.23 or higher will it work? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] OSPF on RouterOS Vritual AP
Yep, that is what I said in the original post. Put the IP on the VirtualAP and no route prorogation. Put it on the physical and it propagates. So the question is, why does the route not propagate from the VirtualAP? And is that corrected in v3.x? I assumed the VirtualAP was just like any other interface, put maybe not. I may try putting it in a bridge and addressing the bridge to see what happens. Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote: A virtual AP is another interface, so unless its bridged with something else, it will have to have an IP to communicate! * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: I have tried to setup OSPF on a Virtual AP in 2.9.49. I have not found a way to get it to forward the route. As soon as I put the address on the physical interface, the route propagates. Any one know if this can be made to work? If I upgrade to 3.23 or higher will it work? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.1/2212 - Release Date: 07/01/09 05:53:00 -- Scott Reed Sr. Systems Engineer GAB Midwest 1-800-363-1544 x4000 Cell: 260-273-7239 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] OSPF on RouterOS Vritual AP
Is something connected to the VAP? Why would it send if its on the physical unless the other end is connected to the physical ap vs the vap. * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: Yep, that is what I said in the original post. Put the IP on the VirtualAP and no route prorogation. Put it on the physical and it propagates. So the question is, why does the route not propagate from the VirtualAP? And is that corrected in v3.x? I assumed the VirtualAP was just like any other interface, put maybe not. I may try putting it in a bridge and addressing the bridge to see what happens. Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote: A virtual AP is another interface, so unless its bridged with something else, it will have to have an IP to communicate! * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: I have tried to setup OSPF on a Virtual AP in 2.9.49. I have not found a way to get it to forward the route. As soon as I put the address on the physical interface, the route propagates. Any one know if this can be made to work? If I upgrade to 3.23 or higher will it work? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.1/2212 - Release Date: 07/01/09 05:53:00 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] OSPF on RouterOS Vritual AP
Nothing associated on the Virtual. The propagation was back out via the wire interface. I would not think it should matter if anything is connected. The interface is active, it has an address. That address range should be propagated by OSPF. I will be at the site tomorrow. I will connect to the VirtualAP and see if that matters. Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote: Is something connected to the VAP? Why would it send if its on the physical unless the other end is connected to the physical ap vs the vap. * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: Yep, that is what I said in the original post. Put the IP on the VirtualAP and no route prorogation. Put it on the physical and it propagates. So the question is, why does the route not propagate from the VirtualAP? And is that corrected in v3.x? I assumed the VirtualAP was just like any other interface, put maybe not. I may try putting it in a bridge and addressing the bridge to see what happens. Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote: A virtual AP is another interface, so unless its bridged with something else, it will have to have an IP to communicate! * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: I have tried to setup OSPF on a Virtual AP in 2.9.49. I have not found a way to get it to forward the route. As soon as I put the address on the physical interface, the route propagates. Any one know if this can be made to work? If I upgrade to 3.23 or higher will it work? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.1/2212 - Release Date: 07/01/09 05:53:00 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.1/2212 - Release Date: 07/01/09 05:53:00 -- Scott Reed Sr. Systems Engineer GAB Midwest 1-800-363-1544 x4000 Cell: 260-273-7239 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
Re: [WISPA] OSPF on RouterOS Vritual AP
If nothing was associated to the virtual AP then I'm thinking Dennis' idea is right - it has no reason to propagate information to an interface that is unplugged. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however improbable, must be the truth. --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Scott Reed scottr...@onlyinternet.netwrote: Nothing associated on the Virtual. The propagation was back out via the wire interface. I would not think it should matter if anything is connected. The interface is active, it has an address. That address range should be propagated by OSPF. I will be at the site tomorrow. I will connect to the VirtualAP and see if that matters. Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote: Is something connected to the VAP? Why would it send if its on the physical unless the other end is connected to the physical ap vs the vap. * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com /* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: Yep, that is what I said in the original post. Put the IP on the VirtualAP and no route prorogation. Put it on the physical and it propagates. So the question is, why does the route not propagate from the VirtualAP? And is that corrected in v3.x? I assumed the VirtualAP was just like any other interface, put maybe not. I may try putting it in a bridge and addressing the bridge to see what happens. Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote: A virtual AP is another interface, so unless its bridged with something else, it will have to have an IP to communicate! * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: I have tried to setup OSPF on a Virtual AP in 2.9.49. I have not found a way to get it to forward the route. As soon as I put the address on the physical interface, the route propagates. Any one know if this can be made to work? If I upgrade to 3.23 or higher will it work? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.1/2212 - Release Date: 07/01/09 05:53:00 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives:
Re: [WISPA] OSPF on RouterOS Vritual AP
Maybe. I will definitely try tomorrow at the site. I just tried on a wired interface that has nothing connected. Rather interesting. If the interface is enabled, it immediately propagates the route. If it is disabled when the address is moved it does not propagate. Leads me to believe when I associate to the VAP, it will make the route propagate. Thanks to both of you for the responses. Josh Luthman wrote: If nothing was associated to the virtual AP then I'm thinking Dennis' idea is right - it has no reason to propagate information to an interface that is unplugged. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however improbable, must be the truth. --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Scott Reed scottr...@onlyinternet.netwrote: Nothing associated on the Virtual. The propagation was back out via the wire interface. I would not think it should matter if anything is connected. The interface is active, it has an address. That address range should be propagated by OSPF. I will be at the site tomorrow. I will connect to the VirtualAP and see if that matters. Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote: Is something connected to the VAP? Why would it send if its on the physical unless the other end is connected to the physical ap vs the vap. * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com /* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: Yep, that is what I said in the original post. Put the IP on the VirtualAP and no route prorogation. Put it on the physical and it propagates. So the question is, why does the route not propagate from the VirtualAP? And is that corrected in v3.x? I assumed the VirtualAP was just like any other interface, put maybe not. I may try putting it in a bridge and addressing the bridge to see what happens. Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote: A virtual AP is another interface, so unless its bridged with something else, it will have to have an IP to communicate! * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: I have tried to setup OSPF on a Virtual AP in 2.9.49. I have not found a way to get it to forward the route. As soon as I put the address on the physical interface, the route propagates. Any one know if this can be made to work? If I upgrade to 3.23 or higher will it work? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] OSPF on RouterOS Vritual AP
It was all Dennis :) On 7/1/09, Scott Reed scottr...@onlyinternet.net wrote: Maybe. I will definitely try tomorrow at the site. I just tried on a wired interface that has nothing connected. Rather interesting. If the interface is enabled, it immediately propagates the route. If it is disabled when the address is moved it does not propagate. Leads me to believe when I associate to the VAP, it will make the route propagate. Thanks to both of you for the responses. Josh Luthman wrote: If nothing was associated to the virtual AP then I'm thinking Dennis' idea is right - it has no reason to propagate information to an interface that is unplugged. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however improbable, must be the truth. --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Scott Reed scottr...@onlyinternet.netwrote: Nothing associated on the Virtual. The propagation was back out via the wire interface. I would not think it should matter if anything is connected. The interface is active, it has an address. That address range should be propagated by OSPF. I will be at the site tomorrow. I will connect to the VirtualAP and see if that matters. Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote: Is something connected to the VAP? Why would it send if its on the physical unless the other end is connected to the physical ap vs the vap. * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com /* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: Yep, that is what I said in the original post. Put the IP on the VirtualAP and no route prorogation. Put it on the physical and it propagates. So the question is, why does the route not propagate from the VirtualAP? And is that corrected in v3.x? I assumed the VirtualAP was just like any other interface, put maybe not. I may try putting it in a bridge and addressing the bridge to see what happens. Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote: A virtual AP is another interface, so unless its bridged with something else, it will have to have an IP to communicate! * --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/ Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services WISPA Vendor Member* *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training http://www.onlinemikrotiktraining.com/* The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Scott Reed wrote: I have tried to setup OSPF on a Virtual AP in 2.9.49. I have not found a way to get it to forward the route. As soon as I put the address on the physical interface, the route propagates. Any one know if this can be made to work? If I upgrade to 3.23 or higher will it work? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 /
