Re: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simplyabout beingstickerconscious or not??

2007-02-19 Thread Steve Stroh


Mark:

But, the FACT of the matter is by slapping together that collection  
of pieces to make a radio that you will deploy for commercial,  
revenue service as a telecommunications service provider is ILLEGAL.


You make a compelling case that the pieces parts systems you're  
describing are far more innovative than what's currently on the  
market from the larger vendors... but ultimately irrelevant.


That you don't THINK putting together pieces parts radios for use  
in the US without going through the formality of FCC certification as  
a system SHOULD be illegal is irrelevant.



Thanks,

Steve



On Feb 18, 2007, at Feb 18  09:07 PM, wispa wrote:


On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:52:04 -0800, Patrick Leary wrote

George, ones person's innovation is something that might another
person nothing but migraines. If you think you getting cutting edge
innovation and state of the art technology from the uncertified
manufacturers I don't know what to tell you except your technology
exposure may be a bit narrow.


But Patrick, it's NOT uncertified manufacturers as if we're  
talking about

some big greedy corporation.

Unless you refer to me.  Or the guy down the street.  Or even the  
woman over
in the next town.  Or THOUSANDS of people all over the world who  
find that
what they want to do is either not supported by something off the  
shelf, or
never even conceived by some engineer, or didn't make it past the  
marketing

and budgeting departments.

Download an open and free bit of Linux.  Buy a surplus CPU board.  Buy
whatever radio module you want or need.  Put it in a box and VIOLA,  
you
already have more features most WISP Network operators wnat, than  
Alvarion

can figure out how to put in a box.

Does it have cutting edge RF qualities?  Nope.   Does it have  
Cisco quality
routing?  Nope.  Does it have -100 to +200 degree temperature  
range?  Nope.


But, none of those are required.  I don't have to the BEST rf front  
end and
features to be successful.  I just have to have to have the ones I  
find
necessary, and the ability to get those things changed I need  
changed.  And
these people are endlessly exploring and refining mesh networks,  
customer

controls, routing, etc, etc... and THEY NEVER STOP.

So, if I want the lowest priced VL stuff to route and do NAT at the
customer's end, will Alvarion  build it in for me?  No?  Gee,  
that's already

in the FREE stuff.  Huh.

Next time you whine that there's uncertified manufacturers,  
you're talking
about the workshops, desks, garages, offices, or even spare  
bedrooms of

THOUSANDS and thousands of people spread all around the country.

And we shoulid NOT be stifled by a rigid and corporate-centric  
regulatory

straightjacket.



Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Mark Koskenmaki   Neofast, Inc
Broadband for the Walla Walla Valley and Blue Mountains
541-969-8200

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




---

Steve Stroh
425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Writing about BWIA again! - http://www.bwianews.com




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simplyabout beingstickerconscious or not??

2007-02-19 Thread wispa
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:58:02 -0800, Steve Stroh wrote
 Mark:
 
 But, the FACT of the matter is by slapping together that collection  
 of pieces to make a radio that you will deploy for commercial,  
 revenue service as a telecommunications service provider is ILLEGAL.

But Steve, many of these people are NOT deploying a commercial service 
provider.   Some of them are just hobbyists.  Some of them are just 
networking their back yard.  Some of them are building community free 
networks.   Some of them are doing it to make money.  Some of them are just 
doing it because they can and find it fun and intersting.  

Patrick called ALL of these illegal manufacturers.  

 
 You make a compelling case that the pieces parts systems you're  
 describing are far more innovative than what's currently on the  
 market from the larger vendors... but ultimately irrelevant.

How's it irrelevant?   I make no claims that because it's a good idea or 
workable, that  the law can't be followed.  I'm arguing that it's a change we 
should try to get done.  

 
 That you don't THINK putting together pieces parts radios for use  
 in the US without going through the formality of FCC certification 
 as  a system SHOULD be illegal is irrelevant.

It's relevant, as to why we should lobby for change, Steve.  



Mark Koskenmaki   Neofast, Inc
Broadband for the Walla Walla Valley and Blue Mountains
541-969-8200

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simplyabout beingstickerconscious or not??

2007-02-18 Thread Patrick Leary
George, ones person's innovation is something that might another
person nothing but migraines. If you think you getting cutting edge
innovation and state of the art technology from the uncertified
manufacturers I don't know what to tell you except your technology
exposure may be a bit narrow.

Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 5:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simplyabout
beingstickerconscious or not??

Ho ho ho Patrick,

So, to add to the list of reasons why a lot of wisps use uncertified
gear.

One reason that was exposed, was that manufacturers were not keeping up 
with technology fast enough and the kit systems offered newer technology

and allowed a wisp to be more innovative

What say you Mr. Leary?
Has Alvarion been keeping up fast enough?


George

(oh yeah, I also think there was a lot of crap slung as cpe's)


Patrick Leary wrote:
 Mac,
 
 That's good news that some previously illegal gear is now undergoing
FCC
 certification. It is good for everyone, regardless of what finally led
 them to earn it. As WISPs, you should use that cert as a minimum
litmus
 test, because it will tell you much more than just the cert itself; it
 tells you that the vendor actual is concerned about YOUR business, not
 just the money that can made off you. You should say to any illegal
 vendor that you might use, You know, I like your features and price,
 but before I undertake any more study about the possibility of buying
 your gear you need have your system FCC certified. Do that and those
 guys will change their habits in a hurry.
 
 Patrick Leary
 AVP WISP Markets
 Alvarion, Inc.
 o: 650.314.2628
 c: 760.580.0080
 Vonage: 650.641.1243
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Mac Dearman
 Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 10:17 AM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: RE: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simply about
 beingstickerconscious or not??
 
 Hold your Horses there Sir Patrick! There was one comment that used
that
 in
 their post - I don't think that we as an industry have evolved to
that
 level of degradation in dealing with the laws of the land  air. There
 will
 always be renegades in every avenue of life, but we are not in that
 classification :-) and given a little time we will be someone to be
 reckoned
 with as the industry leader in wireless across this country.
 
  I must admit that I have learned a few things in the past week - or
had
 some things clarified that were quite an awakening for me and a few
 others.
 I (for one) will not deploy even one more piece of hardware that is
not
 FCC
 certified. I have in the last year deployed many unlicensed access
 points 
 back haul radios though. I made a terrible mistake in doing that, but
I
 was
 under a false impression of what was legal. The path we will follow
 from
 this point on is what is really going to count.
 
  I do happen to know of two manufacturers who have gear at FCC
 certification
 labs today undergoing their certifications for some specific pieces of
 their
 gear. This is something that should have taken place a couple years
ago,
 but
 now is better than never. I realize that is not going to affect the
gear
 I
 have in the air today from these guys as it can not be certified -
ever
 -
 even if they happen to get the exact gear certified that I have on
 towers
 today.
 
 I think this last visit WISPA members (Thanks men) made to the FCC
 clarified
 several things that needed clarification:
 
 1. FILLOUT THOSE FORMS!
The FCC is not out to get us. They need the data that only we can
 supply
 them - like who we are, where we are (zip code), how many subs...Etc
 
 This is their way of helping us. With out this data they can only
guess
 how
 many we are, how many we serve and the actual coverage area total.
 Guys -
 y'all please fill out the form 477 - - it's a good thing for us all.
 
 2. WE ARE NOT LEGAL EVEN IF WE ARE NOT OVER POWERED OR OUT OF BAND.
 I am not going into any details here because that is stated just
as
 simple as it can get.

 Sincerely,
 Mac Dearman
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Patrick Leary
 Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 11:33 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simply about being
 stickerconscious or not??
 
 Sticker conscious? So this is what we've become as an industry?
 Following the very clear laws, which were once again just reiterated
to
 us after another in a long chain of WISP visits, or not has now been
 reduced to simply being sticker conscious or not sticker
conscious?
 Why not go further and call yourself Illegal and proud or just I
 don't give

Re: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simplyabout beingstickerconscious or not??

2007-02-18 Thread George Rogato

Aw come on now.

Thats  was just a not well thought out hip shot slur.

Fact was you just said Tranzeo you admired. They were innovative. Been 
there for 5 years now. I used them when you were selling FHSS as the 
ultimate 2.4 solution.


Here is you chance, list your companies innovations by chronological 
order starting the day you took the evangelist job up until now, and I 
will demonstrate to you, how the big manufacturers hold us up.


Again, not a rub against Alvarion, I truly respect your company, but, I 
want to make a point here.


George


Patrick Leary wrote:

George, ones person's innovation is something that might another
person nothing but migraines. If you think you getting cutting edge
innovation and state of the art technology from the uncertified
manufacturers I don't know what to tell you except your technology
exposure may be a bit narrow.

Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 5:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simplyabout
beingstickerconscious or not??

Ho ho ho Patrick,

So, to add to the list of reasons why a lot of wisps use uncertified
gear.

One reason that was exposed, was that manufacturers were not keeping up 
with technology fast enough and the kit systems offered newer technology


and allowed a wisp to be more innovative

What say you Mr. Leary?
Has Alvarion been keeping up fast enough?


George

(oh yeah, I also think there was a lot of crap slung as cpe's)


Patrick Leary wrote:


Mac,

That's good news that some previously illegal gear is now undergoing


FCC


certification. It is good for everyone, regardless of what finally led
them to earn it. As WISPs, you should use that cert as a minimum


litmus


test, because it will tell you much more than just the cert itself; it
tells you that the vendor actual is concerned about YOUR business, not
just the money that can made off you. You should say to any illegal
vendor that you might use, You know, I like your features and price,
but before I undertake any more study about the possibility of buying
your gear you need have your system FCC certified. Do that and those
guys will change their habits in a hurry.

Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On


Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 10:17 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simply about
beingstickerconscious or not??

Hold your Horses there Sir Patrick! There was one comment that used


that


in
their post - I don't think that we as an industry have evolved to


that


level of degradation in dealing with the laws of the land  air. There
will
always be renegades in every avenue of life, but we are not in that
classification :-) and given a little time we will be someone to be
reckoned
with as the industry leader in wireless across this country.

I must admit that I have learned a few things in the past week - or


had


some things clarified that were quite an awakening for me and a few
others.
I (for one) will not deploy even one more piece of hardware that is


not


FCC
certified. I have in the last year deployed many unlicensed access
points 
back haul radios though. I made a terrible mistake in doing that, but


I


was
under a false impression of what was legal. The path we will follow
from
this point on is what is really going to count.

I do happen to know of two manufacturers who have gear at FCC
certification
labs today undergoing their certifications for some specific pieces of
their
gear. This is something that should have taken place a couple years


ago,


but
now is better than never. I realize that is not going to affect the


gear


I
have in the air today from these guys as it can not be certified -


ever


-
even if they happen to get the exact gear certified that I have on
towers
today.

I think this last visit WISPA members (Thanks men) made to the FCC
clarified
several things that needed clarification:

1. FILLOUT THOSE FORMS!
  The FCC is not out to get us. They need the data that only we can
supply
them - like who we are, where we are (zip code), how many subs...Etc

This is their way of helping us. With out this data they can only


guess


how
many we are, how many we serve and the actual coverage area total.
Guys -
y'all please fill out the form 477 - - it's a good thing for us all.

2. WE ARE NOT LEGAL EVEN IF WE ARE NOT OVER POWERED OR OUT OF BAND.
   I am not going into any details here because that is stated just


as


simple as it can get.
  
Sincerely,

Mac Dearman




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simplyabout beingstickerconscious or not??

2007-02-18 Thread George Rogato
And, just list the American UL stuff, skip the non American and licensed 
gear.




George Rogato wrote:

Aw come on now.

Thats  was just a not well thought out hip shot slur.

Fact was you just said Tranzeo you admired. They were innovative. Been 
there for 5 years now. I used them when you were selling FHSS as the 
ultimate 2.4 solution.


Here is you chance, list your companies innovations by chronological 
order starting the day you took the evangelist job up until now, and I 
will demonstrate to you, how the big manufacturers hold us up.


Again, not a rub against Alvarion, I truly respect your company, but, I 
want to make a point here.


George


Patrick Leary wrote:


George, ones person's innovation is something that might another
person nothing but migraines. If you think you getting cutting edge
innovation and state of the art technology from the uncertified
manufacturers I don't know what to tell you except your technology
exposure may be a bit narrow.

Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 5:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simplyabout
beingstickerconscious or not??

Ho ho ho Patrick,

So, to add to the list of reasons why a lot of wisps use uncertified
gear.

One reason that was exposed, was that manufacturers were not keeping 
up with technology fast enough and the kit systems offered newer 
technology


and allowed a wisp to be more innovative

What say you Mr. Leary?
Has Alvarion been keeping up fast enough?


George

(oh yeah, I also think there was a lot of crap slung as cpe's)


Patrick Leary wrote:


Mac,

That's good news that some previously illegal gear is now undergoing



FCC


certification. It is good for everyone, regardless of what finally led
them to earn it. As WISPs, you should use that cert as a minimum



litmus


test, because it will tell you much more than just the cert itself; it
tells you that the vendor actual is concerned about YOUR business, not
just the money that can made off you. You should say to any illegal
vendor that you might use, You know, I like your features and price,
but before I undertake any more study about the possibility of buying
your gear you need have your system FCC certified. Do that and those
guys will change their habits in a hurry.

Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



On


Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 10:17 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simply about
beingstickerconscious or not??

Hold your Horses there Sir Patrick! There was one comment that used



that


in
their post - I don't think that we as an industry have evolved to



that


level of degradation in dealing with the laws of the land  air. There
will
always be renegades in every avenue of life, but we are not in that
classification :-) and given a little time we will be someone to be
reckoned
with as the industry leader in wireless across this country.

I must admit that I have learned a few things in the past week - or



had


some things clarified that were quite an awakening for me and a few
others.
I (for one) will not deploy even one more piece of hardware that is



not


FCC
certified. I have in the last year deployed many unlicensed access
points 
back haul radios though. I made a terrible mistake in doing that, but



I


was
under a false impression of what was legal. The path we will follow
from
this point on is what is really going to count.

I do happen to know of two manufacturers who have gear at FCC
certification
labs today undergoing their certifications for some specific pieces of
their
gear. This is something that should have taken place a couple years



ago,


but
now is better than never. I realize that is not going to affect the



gear


I
have in the air today from these guys as it can not be certified -



ever


-
even if they happen to get the exact gear certified that I have on
towers
today.

I think this last visit WISPA members (Thanks men) made to the FCC
clarified
several things that needed clarification:

1. FILLOUT THOSE FORMS!
  The FCC is not out to get us. They need the data that only we can
supply
them - like who we are, where we are (zip code), how many subs...Etc

This is their way of helping us. With out this data they can only



guess


how
many we are, how many we serve and the actual coverage area total.
Guys -
y'all please fill out the form 477 - - it's a good thing for us all.

2. WE ARE NOT LEGAL EVEN IF WE ARE NOT OVER POWERED OR OUT OF BAND.
   I am not going into any details here because that is stated just



as


simple as it can

RE: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simplyabout beingstickerconscious or not??

2007-02-18 Thread wispa
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:52:04 -0800, Patrick Leary wrote
 George, ones person's innovation is something that might another
 person nothing but migraines. If you think you getting cutting edge
 innovation and state of the art technology from the uncertified
 manufacturers I don't know what to tell you except your technology
 exposure may be a bit narrow.

But Patrick, it's NOT uncertified manufacturers as if we're talking about 
some big greedy corporation.

Unless you refer to me.  Or the guy down the street.  Or even the woman over 
in the next town.  Or THOUSANDS of people all over the world who find that 
what they want to do is either not supported by something off the shelf, or 
never even conceived by some engineer, or didn't make it past the marketing 
and budgeting departments.

Download an open and free bit of Linux.  Buy a surplus CPU board.  Buy 
whatever radio module you want or need.  Put it in a box and VIOLA, you 
already have more features most WISP Network operators wnat, than Alvarion 
can figure out how to put in a box.  

Does it have cutting edge RF qualities?  Nope.   Does it have Cisco quality 
routing?  Nope.  Does it have -100 to +200 degree temperature range?  Nope. 

But, none of those are required.  I don't have to the BEST rf front end and 
features to be successful.  I just have to have to have the ones I find 
necessary, and the ability to get those things changed I need changed.  And 
these people are endlessly exploring and refining mesh networks, customer 
controls, routing, etc, etc... and THEY NEVER STOP.   

So, if I want the lowest priced VL stuff to route and do NAT at the 
customer's end, will Alvarion  build it in for me?  No?  Gee, that's already 
in the FREE stuff.  Huh. 

Next time you whine that there's uncertified manufacturers, you're talking 
about the workshops, desks, garages, offices, or even spare bedrooms of 
THOUSANDS and thousands of people spread all around the country.  

And we shoulid NOT be stifled by a rigid and corporate-centric regulatory 
straightjacket.  

 
 Patrick Leary
 AVP WISP Markets
 Alvarion, Inc.
 o: 650.314.2628
 c: 760.580.0080
 Vonage: 650.641.1243
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



Mark Koskenmaki   Neofast, Inc
Broadband for the Walla Walla Valley and Blue Mountains
541-969-8200

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simplyabout beingstickerconscious or not??

2007-02-18 Thread Tom DeReggi

Be careful George, you are taunting Patrick with that one. :-)
The last time someone did that, he posted a several page book, listing about 
50 reasons how the VL series innovated beyond its competitors. Alvarion may 
not offer all the same flexibility as the other oem products, but it sure is 
leading the industry with innovation of many unique features.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simplyabout 
beingstickerconscious or not??




Ho ho ho Patrick,

So, to add to the list of reasons why a lot of wisps use uncertified gear.

One reason that was exposed, was that manufacturers were not keeping up 
with technology fast enough and the kit systems offered newer technology 
and allowed a wisp to be more innovative


What say you Mr. Leary?
Has Alvarion been keeping up fast enough?


George

(oh yeah, I also think there was a lot of crap slung as cpe's)


Patrick Leary wrote:

Mac,

That's good news that some previously illegal gear is now undergoing FCC
certification. It is good for everyone, regardless of what finally led
them to earn it. As WISPs, you should use that cert as a minimum litmus
test, because it will tell you much more than just the cert itself; it
tells you that the vendor actual is concerned about YOUR business, not
just the money that can made off you. You should say to any illegal
vendor that you might use, You know, I like your features and price,
but before I undertake any more study about the possibility of buying
your gear you need have your system FCC certified. Do that and those
guys will change their habits in a hurry.

Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 10:17 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simply about
beingstickerconscious or not??

Hold your Horses there Sir Patrick! There was one comment that used that
in
their post - I don't think that we as an industry have evolved to that
level of degradation in dealing with the laws of the land  air. There
will
always be renegades in every avenue of life, but we are not in that
classification :-) and given a little time we will be someone to be
reckoned
with as the industry leader in wireless across this country.

 I must admit that I have learned a few things in the past week - or had
some things clarified that were quite an awakening for me and a few
others.
I (for one) will not deploy even one more piece of hardware that is not
FCC
certified. I have in the last year deployed many unlicensed access
points 
back haul radios though. I made a terrible mistake in doing that, but I
was
under a false impression of what was legal. The path we will follow
from
this point on is what is really going to count.

 I do happen to know of two manufacturers who have gear at FCC
certification
labs today undergoing their certifications for some specific pieces of
their
gear. This is something that should have taken place a couple years ago,
but
now is better than never. I realize that is not going to affect the gear
I
have in the air today from these guys as it can not be certified - ever
-
even if they happen to get the exact gear certified that I have on
towers
today.

I think this last visit WISPA members (Thanks men) made to the FCC
clarified
several things that needed clarification:

1. FILLOUT THOSE FORMS!
   The FCC is not out to get us. They need the data that only we can
supply
them - like who we are, where we are (zip code), how many subs...Etc

This is their way of helping us. With out this data they can only guess
how
many we are, how many we serve and the actual coverage area total.
Guys -
y'all please fill out the form 477 - - it's a good thing for us all.

2. WE ARE NOT LEGAL EVEN IF WE ARE NOT OVER POWERED OR OUT OF BAND.
I am not going into any details here because that is stated just as
simple as it can get.
   Sincerely,
Mac Dearman




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 11:33 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules are now simply about being
stickerconscious or not??

Sticker conscious? So this is what we've become as an industry?
Following the very clear laws, which were once again just reiterated to
us after another in a long chain of WISP visits, or not has now been
reduced to simply being sticker conscious or not sticker conscious?
Why not go further and call yourself Illegal and proud or just I
don't give a ? Let's not have any more gee, I can't afford to be
legal! That's not an argument