Re: [WSG] Encoded mailto links (and accessibility)

2007-10-23 Thread Or Golan
On 10/23/07, Moira Clunie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 On 10/19/07, Michael MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  not much good for someone using a device without sound

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Or Golan
  I'm guessing that a person who uses a screen reader has sound on his
 device.

 Not necessarily - screen reader software can output to synthetic speech
 and/or to refreshable braille. Some people use a screen reader with a
 refreshable braille display and no sound.


 Moira




Is there a place I can read about that technology (screen readers with
refreshable braille)?


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Leopard mail and standards

2007-10-23 Thread Keryx Web

To everybody who has answered me in this thread:

1. I do realize that it is impossible to use perfect markup today, 
mainly because of the ghastly Outlook 2007. (A product I am boycotting 
BTW - but tell the to the mobile phone manufacturers. It syncs with 
Outlook is the ubiquitous sales pitch.)


2. I do realize that the rendering engine in use will be the same one as 
in Safari, which means really good CSS support but rather crappy (but 
improving) JS/DOM support (which is a non issue in mail, IMHO).


BUT: When I outlined the issues (accessibility, separation of concerns, 
valid code) my question was perhaps a bit too unspecific. Will they 
implement best practices as far as it is possible today. Will it be step 
in the right direction or yet another step away from it.


In my world its a sliding scale, not an either - or!


Lars Gunther


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



[WSG] how a href with javascript pass in A level

2007-10-23 Thread Gaspar
Hello,

iam trying to understand how a page that have 1 or 2 javascript in
href could pass in level A of WCAG 1.

it have a noscript but that doesnt prove anything, cynthisays.com and
TAW validators give the some result. I think they should give a
warning or even a Human check.

To prove if equivalent information are provide?

The site that iam testing is www.alentejolitoral.pt it use a
a href=javascript:SEB97811_Submit() title=Go Search

but for using a noscript it pass in level  A, this should be checked
by humam, right!?


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] how a href with javascript pass in A level

2007-10-23 Thread Dave Woods
Hi,

CynthiaSays should only be used as a first step so passing any online
automated accessibility test by no means guarantee's that a site is
accessible so you should always do a manual check.

The search is definitely not accessible on the link you've provided as
it simply doesn't work without JavaScript.

The header (imagemap) also uses JavaScript so this appears broken to
anyone browsing without it. If this same content is still navigable
using the main menu then I wouldn't consider this a major issue
although they should certainly remove the icon (hand pointer) when
JavaScript isn't enabled otherwise it appears clickable when it's not.

I agree, that maybe the online validation tests should give more
warning that you need to manually test as well but I'd always treat
them as an initial test just to ensure you have the basics in place
before a manual accessibility test takes place.

Hope that helps.

Dave

- - - - - - - - - -
Dave Woods
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk



On 23/10/2007, Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

 iam trying to understand how a page that have 1 or 2 javascript in
 href could pass in level A of WCAG 1.

 it have a noscript but that doesnt prove anything, cynthisays.com and
 TAW validators give the some result. I think they should give a
 warning or even a Human check.

 To prove if equivalent information are provide?

 The site that iam testing is www.alentejolitoral.pt it use a
 a href=javascript:SEB97811_Submit() title=Go Search

 but for using a noscript it pass in level  A, this should be checked
 by humam, right!?


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] how a href with javascript pass in A level

2007-10-23 Thread Gaspar
The problem is that the test pass in level A, and some links doesnt
work without javascript but because of a existense of a noscript the
test pass.

I think this should get a manual check or warning.
because almost noscript that i see just tell, this need flash plugin
or this site need javascript or simple tell me that javascript is
disabled.

This it's not alternative information! So all clients that require
level A, still gona have a inaccessible site, right!?


On 23/10/2007, Dave Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 CynthiaSays should only be used as a first step so passing any online
 automated accessibility test by no means guarantee's that a site is
 accessible so you should always do a manual check.

 The search is definitely not accessible on the link you've provided as
 it simply doesn't work without JavaScript.

 The header (imagemap) also uses JavaScript so this appears broken to
 anyone browsing without it. If this same content is still navigable
 using the main menu then I wouldn't consider this a major issue
 although they should certainly remove the icon (hand pointer) when
 JavaScript isn't enabled otherwise it appears clickable when it's not.

 I agree, that maybe the online validation tests should give more
 warning that you need to manually test as well but I'd always treat
 them as an initial test just to ensure you have the basics in place
 before a manual accessibility test takes place.

 Hope that helps.

 Dave

 - - - - - - - - - -
 Dave Woods
 http://www.dave-woods.co.uk



 On 23/10/2007, Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hello,
 
  iam trying to understand how a page that have 1 or 2 javascript in
  href could pass in level A of WCAG 1.
 
  it have a noscript but that doesnt prove anything, cynthisays.com and
  TAW validators give the some result. I think they should give a
  warning or even a Human check.
 
  To prove if equivalent information are provide?
 
  The site that iam testing is www.alentejolitoral.pt it use a
  a href=javascript:SEB97811_Submit() title=Go Search
 
  but for using a noscript it pass in level  A, this should be checked
  by humam, right!?
 
 
  ***
  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ***
 
 


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




-- 
Make it simple for the people
--
http://www.artideias.com


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] how a href with javascript pass in A level

2007-10-23 Thread Patrick Lauke
 Gaspar

 I think this should get a manual check or warning.

You should ALWAYS do human checks of whatever an automated validation tools 
tells you, unless it's something purely technical (e.g. does markup validate to 
spec).

P

Patrick H. Lauke
Web Editor
Enterprise  Development
University of Salford
Room 113, Faraday House
Salford, Greater Manchester
M5 4WT
UK

T +44 (0) 161 295 4779
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.salford.ac.uk

A GREATER MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY  

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] how a href with javascript pass in A level

2007-10-23 Thread Gaspar
yes thats is my oppinion too, but the clients only gona see if pass or not.

And for many developments that's all that matter.


On 23/10/2007, Patrick Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Gaspar

  I think this should get a manual check or warning.

 You should ALWAYS do human checks of whatever an automated validation tools 
 tells you, unless it's something purely technical (e.g. does markup validate 
 to spec).

 P
 
 Patrick H. Lauke
 Web Editor
 Enterprise  Development
 University of Salford
 Room 113, Faraday House
 Salford, Greater Manchester
 M5 4WT
 UK

 T +44 (0) 161 295 4779
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 www.salford.ac.uk

 A GREATER MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY

 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***


-- 
Make it simple for the people
--
http://www.artideias.com


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] How to make DHML cover flash

2007-10-23 Thread James Ellis
Hi Michael

I had about 2 minutes to wait for the flash to download (and I have a 20Mbps
connection), so ample time to click one of the menu items in Konquerer.

For those browsers that don't do the wmode thing, how about some links
elsewhere on the page. For instance in drop down menus it's a good idea to
make the root level menu items linkable to some other page (like stock
service etc etc) - on those pages show some links to their children and so
on..

HTH
James


On 10/23/07, Michael Kear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks Rogier, I appreciate your help.

 Since we are likely to have perhaps 1 or 2 users only using any of those
 browsers, and by far the vast majority of our users are using WindowsXP
 with
 IE6 or IE7 (remember this is not a IT related site  - our customers are
 tshirt retailers and advertising agencies) I've decided the cost/benefit
 of
 fixing that isn't worth it.

 The few users inconvenienced by the issue can just use the back button or
 click on one of the top menu items and get the drop downs from
 there.  Sorry
 for those people, but them's the breaks.   Sometimes you have problems you
 know are there, but just simply aren't high enough in the priorities to
 get
 fixed.

 I have several other deadlines with this client to meet, and they're far
 more important than this one.

 But you're right, Rogier, it ought to be fixed for those users, but it's
 not
 going to be unless I have a slow day sometime.

 Cheers
 Mike Kear
 Windsor, NSW, Australia
 0422 985 585
 Adobe Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
 AFP Webworks Pty Ltd
 http://afpwebworks.com
 Full Scale ColdFusion hosting from A$15/month



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Rogier Schoenmaker
 Sent: Tuesday, 23 October 2007 4:55 AM
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: Re: [WSG] How to make DHML cover flash

 Hello,

 Just so you know, there's no dropdown shown in Firefox (IceWeasel) for
 debian, neither for Epiphany and Konquerer doesn't seem to work with
 flash.

 Hope it's useful.

 Regards,

 Rogier Schoenmaker.





 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Web Standards In Colleges and Universities

2007-10-23 Thread Nancy Johnson
I was hired to work on a section of a fairly visible high volume site in the 
US.  I had an image comp and was all set to build out the structure using 
standards when I got handed the html and css I was supposed to use.

I was aghast as the table based nested table structure that was so sloppy it 
showed externally.  The CSS I received was minimal.

I did clean up the coding in my area, reducing the number of nested tables and 
depending more on divs. I expanded the CSS as well.  

My part and the greater site passed the 508 compliancy testing so it went live.

Nancy Johnson


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] How to make DHML cover flash

2007-10-23 Thread Ted Drake
You can get dhtml to cover flash by setting the flash to use
wmode:transparent. However, this makes the content in the flash invisible to
screen readers.

IE6 is hell with z-index. Especially when combined with form elements. IE7
is much better and you should be able to create a page that works in all
browsers with just a few issues in IE6. 

Yahoo! published the Graded Browser Support chart to justify which browsers
can be supported reasonably. I don't think the browsers listed below are
A-level. However, you shouldn't build to IE, but to standards-compliant
browsers, like firefox/opera for win. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Kear
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 6:14 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] How to make DHML cover flash

Thanks Rogier, I appreciate your help. 

Since we are likely to have perhaps 1 or 2 users only using any of those
browsers, and by far the vast majority of our users are using WindowsXP with
IE6 or IE7 (remember this is not a IT related site  - our customers are
tshirt retailers and advertising agencies) I've decided the cost/benefit of
fixing that isn't worth it. 

The few users inconvenienced by the issue can just use the back button or
click on one of the top menu items and get the drop downs from there.  Sorry
for those people, but them's the breaks.   Sometimes you have problems you
know are there, but just simply aren't high enough in the priorities to get
fixed.

I have several other deadlines with this client to meet, and they're far
more important than this one.

But you're right, Rogier, it ought to be fixed for those users, but it's not
going to be unless I have a slow day sometime.

Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
0422 985 585
Adobe Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
AFP Webworks Pty Ltd
http://afpwebworks.com
Full Scale ColdFusion hosting from A$15/month



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rogier Schoenmaker
Sent: Tuesday, 23 October 2007 4:55 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] How to make DHML cover flash

Hello,

Just so you know, there's no dropdown shown in Firefox (IceWeasel) for
debian, neither for Epiphany and Konquerer doesn't seem to work with
flash.

Hope it's useful.

Regards,

Rogier Schoenmaker.





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] How to make DHML cover flash

2007-10-23 Thread Christian Montoya
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Michael Kear
 Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 6:14 PM
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: RE: [WSG] How to make DHML cover flash

 Since we are likely to have perhaps 1 or 2 users only using any of those
 browsers, and by far the vast majority of our users are using WindowsXP with
 IE6 or IE7 (remember this is not a IT related site  - our customers are
 tshirt retailers and advertising agencies) I've decided the cost/benefit of
 fixing that isn't worth it.

I work with a 6 non-techie business types who are all involved in
advertising/licensing related functions and they all use Firefox by
choice. Have you ever asked your users what they actually use? Do you
have any stats on browsers (Google analytics will tell you this)? If
not, you are just making a poor assumption.

-- 
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.net


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Web Standards In Colleges and Universities

2007-10-23 Thread Tim Palac
The way my school approached it was interesting.  My major was in a
combination of Interactivity, Video, and Animation under the label of Time
Arts.  It was definitely different than what I hear you describing here, so
I think it depends on the university.

For the interactive/web end of things, we had a Director class, Flash class,
and Web development class.  The Director class had nothing to do with the
web, and the Flash class was never about making websites.  In fact, we used
to make small flash applications which could theoretically be used on
websites, and it was easy to see how you could potentially make a website in
Flash.  I think our teacher was against it, though - interestingly enough,
his portfolio site used to be all Flash - I just took a look and he redid it
with XHTML/CSS (granted, frames too, but you can't expect miracles).

The Web Design class was actually a really awesome basis, and more schools
should have a Web course like this.  The teacher was from the Graphic Design
area of the school, and he taught a few classes to our major as well.  He
took us through the conceptual approach to developing for th web - our first
site was based off architecture, the second off redesigning an existing
site, and the third off an abstract concept.  It gave us quite the realm to
work with.  While the layout was done using tables and some CSS for styling,
it gave us a great foundation for moving forward and I was able to easily
learn the remainder of CSS a short while after.

I guess it depends on the major and what people are focusing on, too - for
this class, not a lot of people would eventually become Web Developers (in
fact, I'm one of the only few) so the lack of focus on code wasn't a big
deal (we did code a lot in the Flash course).  For those of us who wanted to
expand there, it gave a great foundation just like all the other courses in
that major.

/End rant.

Tim Palac
http://www.timpalac.com
AIM: TymArtist

On 10/22/07, Christian Snodgrass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am actually having a similar problem. I was able to skip the Web
 Development class, so I didn't have to sit through it, but I am sure it
 is similar to how yours is. We have a Javascript class and the HTML that
 is taught in there is hideous. Also, my teacher in my Multimedia class
 is wanting us to create a Flash-only website, which I've told him is not
 right.

 I'm actually planning on talking to them one-on-one to help them get up
 to today's standards. Also, I work for a group who's primary duty is to
 maintain the residential network, but also does things such as
 computer-related websites. I'm planning on putting together one for
 today's website standards as well as for accessibility and invite pretty
 much every computer and technology related teacher to it so I can help
 try and open some eyes.

 I think it is such a shame when the schools turn out sub-par web
 developers, who later become more roadblocks to acceptable standards
 usage.

 But, like others have already said, don't be confrontational, be
 informative. I am in my 5th semester so I know many of the teachers in
 quite well already, so I can talk to them without them getting
 defensive. You have to be helpful or else they'll just plug their ears
 and refuse to listen.

 Good luck with your school,
 Christian Snodgrass

 James Jeffery wrote:
  Good Morning!
 
  Here is my problem. Im at college this year, preparing for University
  (Hopefully Birmingham) to
  study Software Engineering. At college we have a class on a Thursday
  called Web Development
  and the guy thats teaching the class in an absolute joke, no
  seriously, he is.
 
  He is teaching students how to create web pages using Dreamweaver in
  Design view, and then
  telling students if they can do this, they are Web Designers.
 
  I was angry, i instantly replied and questioned his knowledge on HTML
  and asked the age old question:
  What are tables in HTML used for?, he replied To lay out web pages
  and for tabled data, i replied with
  wrong, he laughed and told me he knows what he is talking about.
 
  I seriously want to raise a huge issue at the college, but im not sure
  how to do it. This guy is on 22k+
  a year, and cannot even teach people correctly, he may have been a pro
  back in the days when tables
  were acceptable to lay out web pages, but  in todays world he is a fool.
 
  Its half term now, we have an assignment to complete using
  Dreamweaver, and he said i have to use
  tables, its not a problem, i will do as the assignment requests. I
  will walk the extra mile and create the
  same page without tables, with semantics, with accessibility in mind
  and without the bloated mark-up,
  and then write a essay comparing the both.
 
  What power do i have (if any) to try and get the college to understand
  they cannot use a cowboy to
  teach tomorrows computer experts. Should i use my essay and examples
  and take it to the head of
  the college? I really don't know how to go 

Re: [WSG] Web Standards In Colleges and Universities

2007-10-23 Thread Dennis Lapcewich
For colleges and universities based in the USA, you might want to look at
your respective state laws with respect web accessibility.  Some states are
either incorporating the federal Section 508 accessibility law for all
state (supported) web sites, or are writing their own state web
accessibility laws to mirror the federal law.

In either case, if you attend a college or university in one of those
states, and that institution receives federal education funding, you might
want to politely bring it up with your web instructor.  It would be rather
disingenuous for a web instructor to not teach according to web standards
and accessibility requirements, when their employer's web site (the college
or university web site)  probably comes under the state law jurisdiction
with respect to W3C and accessibility standards as required by that state's
laws.



 Dennis Lapcewich   
 USDA Forest Service Webmaster  
 Pacific Northwest Region - Vancouver, WA   
 360-891-5024 - Voice | 360-891-5045 - Fax  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   

 People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing 
 it. -- Anonymous  






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] CSS Help

2007-10-23 Thread Tim MacKay

Hi There,

You just need to put a rule in your style sheet to exempt images from 
the hover style. This should work as a global rule:


#sidebar a img {border: none}

Hope this helps.

Tim

Olajide Olaolorun wrote:

Can someone please help me with this small problem i'm having I
seem to have a problem with the link hover style i set for the whole
sidebar with the images I am trying to take it out for images that
are links... like the image showing to the right in the sidebar... but
i have no success. Can someone please help me out.

http://www.rockondude.net/pre

If you see the thumbnail to the right... am trying to take out the
hover style for that.

Thanks a lot.




--
*Tim Mackay*
Web Developer

p:   +612 8917 7900
e:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
w:   www.deepend.com.au http://www.deepend.com.au


http://www.deepend.com.au/latest http://www.deepend.com.au/


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



[WSG] Javascript Code not working in IE6

2007-10-23 Thread Alexander Uribe
 



In my javascript class at college, I have to find out why this piece of code 
does not run in IE6.
I can't seem to figure out why.
If anyone knows, that would be great

cheers,

Alex.

Code below

!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN 
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd;
html
head
titleExercise 4/title
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8
style type=text/css
.borders {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 150px;
}

.li_borders {
background: yellow;
border: 1px solid blue;
color: red;
}
.li2_borders {
background: blue;
color: white;
}
#ul2 {
xwidth: 150px;
}

#ul2 li {
border-color: silver;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 1px 1px 0px 1px;
display: inline;
font-weight:bold;
margin: 0;
padding: 0 4px;
}
/style
script type=text/javascript
window.onload = init;
function init()
{
var liArr = new Array();
var idx;
//--- process first UL block
var id = document.getElementById(ul1);
id.addEventListener(mouseover, ul1on, false);
id.addEventListener(mouseout, ul1off, false);
liArr = id.getElementsByTagName(li);
for(idx=0; idxliArr.length; idx++ ) {
liArr[idx].addEventListener(click, li_s, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseover, li_on, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseout, li_off, false);
}
//--- process second UL block
id = document.getElementById(ul2);
liArr = id.getElementsByTagName(li);
for(idx=0; idxliArr.length; idx++ ) {
liArr[idx].addEventListener(click, li_s, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseover, li2_on, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseout, li2_off, false);
}
}
function ul1on() { document.getElementById(ul1).className=borders;}
function ul1off(){ document.getElementById(ul1).className=;}
function li_s()  { alert(this.innerHTML); }  
function li_on() { document.getElementById(this.id).className=li_borders;}
function li_off(){ document.getElementById(this.id).className=;}
function li2_on() { document.getElementById(this.id).className=li2_borders;}
function li2_off(){ document.getElementById(this.id).className=;}
/script
/head
body 
pThis doesn't work in Internet Explorer 6. Why and whats the solution?/p
ul id=ul1 
  li id=li11item 1/li 
  li id=li12item 2/li 
  li id=li13item 3 /li 
/ul 
ul id=ul2 
  li id=li21item 1/li 
  li id=li22item 2/li 
  li id=li23item 3 /li 
/ul 
/body
/html


_
What are you waiting for? Join Lavalife FREE
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Flavalife9%2Eninemsn%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fclickthru%2Fclickthru%2Eact%3Fid%3Dninemsn%26context%3Dan99%26locale%3Den%5FAU%26a%3D30288_t=764581033_r=email_taglines_Join_free_OCT07_m=EXT

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


Re: [WSG] CSS Help

2007-10-23 Thread Web King Design
Your image is using the same a:hover properties as the text a:hover. so 
give the image its own class or id attribute, with no border, so say...


.noborder{border:none} then add img class=noborder to the image

Ben








Olajide Olaolorun wrote:

Can someone please help me with this small problem i'm having I
seem to have a problem with the link hover style i set for the whole
sidebar with the images I am trying to take it out for images that
are links... like the image showing to the right in the sidebar... but
i have no success. Can someone please help me out.

http://www.rockondude.net/pre

If you see the thumbnail to the right... am trying to take out the
hover style for that.

Thanks a lot.


  



--
*Web King Design limited*
Web: www.webking.co.nz http://webking.co.nz
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: 0064 21 0224 6986


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

2007-10-23 Thread Olajide Olaolorun
It doesnt work :(

I just tried it now... placed it in the default.css

On 10/23/07, Tim MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi There,

 You just need to put a rule in your style sheet to exempt images from
 the hover style. This should work as a global rule:

 #sidebar a img {border: none}

 Hope this helps.

 Tim

 Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
  Can someone please help me with this small problem i'm having I
  seem to have a problem with the link hover style i set for the whole
  sidebar with the images I am trying to take it out for images that
  are links... like the image showing to the right in the sidebar... but
  i have no success. Can someone please help me out.
 
  http://www.rockondude.net/pre
 
  If you see the thumbnail to the right... am trying to take out the
  hover style for that.
 
  Thanks a lot.
 
 

 --
 *Tim Mackay*
 Web Developer

 p:   +612 8917 7900
 e:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 w:   www.deepend.com.au http://www.deepend.com.au


 http://www.deepend.com.au/latest http://www.deepend.com.au/


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




-- 
Best Regards,
Olajide Olaolorun
###
Personal: http://www.olajideolaolorun.com
Business: http://www.tripleo.biz


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] CSS Help

2007-10-23 Thread Chris Knowles
Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
 It doesnt work :(
 
 I just tried it now... placed it in the default.css
 
 On 10/23/07, Tim MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 #sidebar a img {border: none}


I haven't looked at your code but you mentioned it not displaying a
border on hover so presumably you need this:

#sidebar a:hover img {border: none}


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] CSS Help

2007-10-23 Thread Olajide Olaolorun
That doesnt work too Ben...

On 10/23/07, Web King Design [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Your image is using the same a:hover properties as the text a:hover. so
 give the image its own class or id attribute, with no border, so say...

   .noborder{border:none} then add img class=noborder to the image

  Ben








  Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
  Can someone please help me with this small problem i'm having I
 seem to have a problem with the link hover style i set for the whole
 sidebar with the images I am trying to take it out for images that
 are links... like the image showing to the right in the sidebar... but
 i have no success. Can someone please help me out.

 http://www.rockondude.net/pre

 If you see the thumbnail to the right... am trying to take out the
 hover style for that.

 Thanks a lot.






 --


 Web King Design limited
  Web: www.webking.co.nz
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Mobile: 0064 21 0224 6986

 ***
 List Guidelines:
 http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe:
 http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***


-- 
Best Regards,
Olajide Olaolorun
###
Personal: http://www.olajideolaolorun.com
Business: http://www.tripleo.biz


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] CSS Help

2007-10-23 Thread Tim MacKay

I think Chris is right. Set the a:hover to {border: none;}

Olajide Olaolorun wrote:

It doesnt work :(

I just tried it now... placed it in the default.css

On 10/23/07, Tim MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi There,

You just need to put a rule in your style sheet to exempt images from
the hover style. This should work as a global rule:

#sidebar a img {border: none}

Hope this helps.

Tim

Olajide Olaolorun wrote:

Can someone please help me with this small problem i'm having I
seem to have a problem with the link hover style i set for the whole
sidebar with the images I am trying to take it out for images that
are links... like the image showing to the right in the sidebar... but
i have no success. Can someone please help me out.

http://www.rockondude.net/pre

If you see the thumbnail to the right... am trying to take out the
hover style for that.

Thanks a lot.



--
*Tim Mackay*
Web Developer

p:   +612 8917 7900
e:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
w:   www.deepend.com.au http://www.deepend.com.au


http://www.deepend.com.au/latest http://www.deepend.com.au/


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***







--
*Tim Mackay*
Web Developer

p:   +612 8917 7900
e:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
w:   www.deepend.com.au http://www.deepend.com.au


http://www.deepend.com.au/latest http://www.deepend.com.au/


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Javascript Code not working in IE6

2007-10-23 Thread Focas, Grant
IE does not support the W3C addEventListener, it uses attacheEvent so
you need a cross-browser way to attach events. Here's one:

 

function attachEventListener(target, eventType, functionRef, capture){

  // function can be called with a pointer or a string representing
a function name

  if (typeof(functionRef)== 'string') {

functionRef=eval(functionRef);

  }

  if (typeof target.addEventListener != undefined){

target.addEventListener(eventType, functionRef, capture);

  } else if (typeof target.attachEvent != undefined){

target.attachEvent(on + eventType, functionRef);

  } else {

eventType = on + eventType;

if(typeof target[eventType] == function){

var oldListener = target[eventType];

target[eventType] = function(){

oldListener();

return functionRef();

};

}else{

target[eventType] = functionRef;

}

  }

}

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Alexander Uribe
Sent: Wednesday, 24 October 2007 10:09 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Javascript Code not working in IE6

 




In my javascript class at college, I have to find out why this piece of
code does not run in IE6.
I can't seem to figure out why.
If anyone knows, that would be great

cheers,

Alex.

Code below

!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd;
html
head
titleExercise 4/title
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8
style type=text/css
.borders {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 150px;
}

.li_borders {
background: yellow;
border: 1px solid blue;
color: red;
}
.li2_borders {
background: blue;
color: white;
}
#ul2 {
xwidth: 150px;
}

#ul2 li {
border-color: silver;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 1px 1px 0px 1px;
display: inline;
font-weight:bold;
margin: 0;
padding: 0 4px;
}
/style
script type=text/javascript
window.onload = init;
function init()
{
var liArr = new Array();
var idx;
//--- process first UL block
var id = document.getElementById(ul1);
id.addEventListener(mouseover, ul1on, false);
id.addEventListener(mouseout, ul1off, false);
liArr = id.getElementsByTagName(li);
for(idx=0; idxliArr.length; idx++ ) {
liArr[idx].addEventListener(click, li_s, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseover, li_on, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseout, li_off, false);
}
//--- process second UL block
id = document.getElementById(ul2);
liArr = id.getElementsByTagName(li);
for(idx=0; idxliArr.length; idx++ ) {
liArr[idx].addEventListener(click, li_s, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseover, li2_on, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseout, li2_off, false);
}
}
function ul1on() { document.getElementById(ul1).className=borders;}
function ul1off(){ document.getElementById(ul1).className=;}
function li_s()  { alert(this.innerHTML); }  
function li_on() {
document.getElementById(this.id).className=li_borders;}
function li_off(){ document.getElementById(this.id).className=;}
function li2_on() {
document.getElementById(this.id).className=li2_borders;}
function li2_off(){ document.getElementById(this.id).className=;}
/script
/head
body 
pThis doesn't work in Internet Explorer 6. Why and whats the
solution?/p
ul id=ul1 
  li id=li11item 1/li 
  li id=li12item 2/li 
  li id=li13item 3 /li 
/ul 
ul id=ul2 
  li id=li21item 1/li 
  li id=li22item 2/li 
  li id=li23item 3 /li 
/ul 
/body
/html





Join Lavalife for free. What are you waiting for?
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Flavalife9%2Eninemsn%2Ec
om%2Eau%2Fclickthru%2Fclickthru%2Eact%3Fid%3Dninemsn%26context%3Dan99%26
locale%3Den%5FAU%26a%3D30288_t=764581033_r=email_taglines_Join_free_OC
T07_m=EXT 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

**
This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
privileged information or confidential information or both. If you
are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender.
**


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


Re: [WSG] CSS Help

2007-10-23 Thread Chris Knowles
Chris Knowles wrote:

 #sidebar a:hover img {border: none}
 

I had a look at your code! - try this:

#sidebar .one-image a:hover   {
border: 0  !important;
}

in your code you used:

#sidebar a:hover,.blogfoot a:hover{
border:1px solid #FFF !important;
}

because tou used important! you need to use it in the override rule too


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Javascript Code not working in IE6

2007-10-23 Thread Kevin Lennon

Alexander Uribe wrote:
   



In my javascript class at college, I have to find out why this piece 
of code does not run in IE6.

I can't seem to figure out why.
If anyone knows, that would be great

cheers,

Alex.

Code below

!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN 
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd;

html
head
titleExercise 4/title
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; 
style type=text/css
.borders {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 150px;
}

.li_borders {
background: yellow;
border: 1px solid blue;
color: red;
}
.li2_borders {
background: blue;
color: white;
}
#ul2 {
xwidth: 150px;
}

#ul2 li {
border-color: silver;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 1px 1px 0px 1px;
display: inline;
font-weight:bold;
margin: 0;
padding: 0 4px;
}
/style
script type=text/javascript
window.onload = init;
function init()
{
var liArr = new Array();
var idx;
//--- process first UL block
var id = document.getElementById(ul1);
id.addEventListener(mouseover, ul1on, false);
id.addEventListener(mouseout, ul1off, false);
liArr = id.getElementsByTagName(li);
for(idx=0; idxliArr.length; idx++ ) {
liArr[idx].addEventListener(click, li_s, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseover, li_on, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseout, li_off, false);
}
//--- process second UL block
id = document.getElementById(ul2);
liArr = id.getElementsByTagName(li);
for(idx=0; idxliArr.length; idx++ ) {
liArr[idx].addEventListener(click, li_s, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseover, li2_on, false);
liArr[idx].addEventListener(mouseout, li2_off, false);
}
}
function ul1on() { document.getElementById(ul1).className=borders;}
function ul1off(){ document.getElementById(ul1).className=;}
function li_s()  { alert(this.innerHTML); } 
function li_on() { 
document.getElementById(this.id).className=li_borders;}

function li_off(){ document.getElementById(this.id).className=;}
function li2_on() { 
document.getElementById(this.id).className=li2_borders;}

function li2_off(){ document.getElementById(this.id).className=;}
/script
/head
body
pThis doesn't work in Internet Explorer 6. Why and whats the 
solution?/p

ul id=ul1
  li id=li11item 1/li
  li id=li12item 2/li
  li id=li13item 3 /li
/ul
ul id=ul2
  li id=li21item 1/li
  li id=li22item 2/li
  li id=li23item 3 /li
/ul
/body
/html



Join Lavalife for free. What are you waiting for? 
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Flavalife9%2Eninemsn%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fclickthru%2Fclickthru%2Eact%3Fid%3Dninemsn%26context%3Dan99%26locale%3Den%5FAU%26a%3D30288_t=764581033_r=email_taglines_Join_free_OCT07_m=EXT

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.8/1088 - Release Date: 10/23/2007 1:26 PM
  
Does it have anything to do with the fact that Line 22 #ul2 Property 
xwidth doesn't exist : 150px even if that is not actually JavaScript?



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***begin:vcard
fn:Kevin Lennon
n:Lennon;Kevin
org:Lake Area Webs
adr:;;227 Fire Tower Road;Milford;PA;18337;United States of America
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Web Design  Developer
tel;home:570-296-3865
url:http://www.lakeareawebs.com
version:2.1
end:vcard




Re: [WSG] CSS Help

2007-10-23 Thread Chris Knowles
Chris Knowles wrote:
 Chris Knowles wrote:
 
 #sidebar a:hover img {border: none}

 
 I had a look at your code! - try this:
 
 #sidebar .one-image a:hover   {
 border: 0  !important;
 }

Olajide,

because you are resetting a border of 1px to 0 the image will probably
move so you may need to do this:

#sidebar .one-image a:hover   {
   border: 1px solid #000  !important;
}

-- 
Chris Knowles


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] CSS Help

2007-10-23 Thread Web King Design

try this..

#yourimage a img{ border: none; }


OR

.yourimage{margin:0px}
.yourimage a{border:none}
.yourimage a:hover{border:none;}


Tim MacKay wrote:

I think Chris is right. Set the a:hover to {border: none;}

Olajide Olaolorun wrote:

It doesnt work :(

I just tried it now... placed it in the default.css

On 10/23/07, Tim MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi There,

You just need to put a rule in your style sheet to exempt images from
the hover style. This should work as a global rule:

#sidebar a img {border: none}

Hope this helps.

Tim

Olajide Olaolorun wrote:

Can someone please help me with this small problem i'm having I
seem to have a problem with the link hover style i set for the whole
sidebar with the images I am trying to take it out for images that
are links... like the image showing to the right in the sidebar... but
i have no success. Can someone please help me out.

http://www.rockondude.net/pre

If you see the thumbnail to the right... am trying to take out the
hover style for that.

Thanks a lot.



--
*Tim Mackay*
Web Developer

p:   +612 8917 7900
e:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
w:   www.deepend.com.au http://www.deepend.com.au


http://www.deepend.com.au/latest http://www.deepend.com.au/


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***










--
*Web King Design limited*
Web: www.webking.co.nz http://webking.co.nz
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: 0064 21 0224 6986


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

2007-10-23 Thread David Niemann

Try this...

a img { margin-bottom: -2px; vertical-align: sub; border: none;}

Worked for me in a similar situation.

David

On 24/10/2007, at 9:03 AM, Olajide Olaolorun wrote:


Can someone please help me with this small problem i'm having I
seem to have a problem with the link hover style i set for the whole
sidebar with the images I am trying to take it out for images that
are links... like the image showing to the right in the sidebar... but
i have no success. Can someone please help me out.

http://www.rockondude.net/pre

If you see the thumbnail to the right... am trying to take out the
hover style for that.

Thanks a lot.








***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] CSS Help

2007-10-23 Thread Chris Wilson
Contrary to everything else put forth about the 'issue', this actually
works...

change
#sidebar a:hover,.blogfoot a:hover{
border:1px solid #FFF !important;
}

to

#sidebar li a:hover,.blogfoot a:hover{
border:1px solid #FFF !important;
}

add the li so it only applies to links inside the list. simple pie. The
other attempts here try to fix a problem with an extra rule, when if done
correctly you don't need it.



On 10/23/07, David Niemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Try this...

 a img { margin-bottom: -2px; vertical-align: sub; border: none;}

 Worked for me in a similar situation.

 David

 On 24/10/2007, at 9:03 AM, Olajide Olaolorun wrote:

  Can someone please help me with this small problem i'm having I
  seem to have a problem with the link hover style i set for the whole
  sidebar with the images I am trying to take it out for images that
  are links... like the image showing to the right in the sidebar... but
  i have no success. Can someone please help me out.
 
  http://www.rockondude.net/pre
 
  If you see the thumbnail to the right... am trying to take out the
  hover style for that.
 
  Thanks a lot.
 
 





 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

2007-10-23 Thread Chris Knowles
Chris Wilson wrote:

 Contrary to everything else put forth about the 'issue', this actually
 works...

that statement isn't correct because this also works:

#sidebar .one-image a:hover   {
   border: 1px solid #000  !important;
}


 The other attempts here try to fix a problem with an extra rule, when if
 done correctly you don't need it.

I don't think there is a correct way,  there are just different ways, as
all solutions have their implications - e.g. your solution assumes only
links in lists require this style which is not necessarily the case - so
if other links are added outside of a list an extra rule may be required
for them

the solution I have given above may add an extra rule but it solves the
problem without tampering with the existing css - so it's not
necessarily clear which solution is better


-- 
Chris Knowles


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] CSS Help

2007-10-23 Thread Chris Wilson
Lex parsimoniae.

Cheers.



On 10/23/07, Chris Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Chris Wilson wrote:
 
  Contrary to everything else put forth about the 'issue', this actually
  works...

 that statement isn't correct because this also works:

 #sidebar .one-image a:hover   {
border: 1px solid #000  !important;
 }


  The other attempts here try to fix a problem with an extra rule, when if
  done correctly you don't need it.

 I don't think there is a correct way,  there are just different ways, as
 all solutions have their implications - e.g. your solution assumes only
 links in lists require this style which is not necessarily the case - so
 if other links are added outside of a list an extra rule may be required
 for them

 the solution I have given above may add an extra rule but it solves the
 problem without tampering with the existing css - so it's not
 necessarily clear which solution is better


 --
 Chris Knowles


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] CSS Help

2007-10-23 Thread Olajide Olaolorun
Chris Knowles solution works... both of them... I used the first one
though cause i didnt want the border at all. Under firefox, the border
cuts into the h3 title... so i dont mind the shifting

Thanks a lot guys

On 10/23/07, Chris Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Chris Wilson wrote:
 
  Contrary to everything else put forth about the 'issue', this actually
  works...

 that statement isn't correct because this also works:

 #sidebar .one-image a:hover   {
border: 1px solid #000  !important;
 }


  The other attempts here try to fix a problem with an extra rule, when if
  done correctly you don't need it.

 I don't think there is a correct way,  there are just different ways, as
 all solutions have their implications - e.g. your solution assumes only
 links in lists require this style which is not necessarily the case - so
 if other links are added outside of a list an extra rule may be required
 for them

 the solution I have given above may add an extra rule but it solves the
 problem without tampering with the existing css - so it's not
 necessarily clear which solution is better


 --
 Chris Knowles


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ***




-- 
Best Regards,
Olajide Olaolorun
###
Personal: http://www.olajideolaolorun.com
Business: http://www.tripleo.biz


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] how a href with javascript pass in A level

2007-10-23 Thread Michael MD



The problem is that the test pass in level A, and some links doesnt
work without javascript but because of a existense of a noscript the
test pass.

I think this should get a manual check or warning.
because almost noscript that i see just tell, this need flash plugin
or this site need javascript or simple tell me that javascript is
disabled.

This it's not alternative information! So all clients that require
level A, still gona have a inaccessible site, right!?




That means it would also fail my old favourite accessability test going 
right back to the old days ...
- view it in lynx to see what the page looks like without images, plugins, 
javascript, css or tables


http://lynx.isc.org/


lynx was also the first web browser I ever used back in 1994 (I had a 386 
back then with 2MB RAM and a shell account on linux bbs - so running 
something like Mosaic or Netscape was not possible!)


I guess thats why I knew about hx tags, the alt attribute, unordered lists, 
etc before I knew anything about tables, fonts, etc...
because until a couple of years later when I bought a new computer I wasn't 
very interested in markup I could not see on lynx!









***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***