Re: [WSG] Website review : http://webprocafe.com

2009-01-20 Thread Luke Hoggett

Hi,

Just tabbed through the page and the login form are the very last 
elements on the page to be hit, needs a lower tab-index, not very nice 
in terms of accessibility.


cheers
Luke

Stewart Griffiths wrote:

Harsh is fine, it's a critique / review we asked for ;o)

Got rid of all but one error, which is a vb one, so will work on 
finding that. As for breaking when the text is increased, well, as you 
state this is due to the way vb spits out the code. But we can work on 
that going forward. WE will look at the typography we are using and 
look to make it consistent across the site, the background gradiants 
and the nav icons we will again look at updating.


Thanks for the feedback, this is all great stuff.

Stew

2009/1/16 Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis bhawkesle...@googlemail.com 
mailto:bhawkesle...@googlemail.com


On 16/1/09 16:41, Stewart Griffiths wrote:

Please can you provide feedback on the following website
http://webprocafe.com/

We are looking for thoughts on the design and usability of the
site,
plus any general feedback you want to provide.


Hmm.

Just looked at the homepage.

Pointless XHTML formedness errors, lack of heading elements, table
layouts, presentational markup, inline styles, obtrusive
JavaScript, unnecessary browser detection, presentational class
names, and a layout that begins to break with only two text size
steps up (at least in Safari) may be byproducts of vBulletin but
they undercut the site's ostensible purpose of discussing
professional web development in a way that I find hard to overlook
given you've adopted a self-hosted solution for the forum.

More subjectively, I think the random bits of sans-serif (menu
links at the side and some of the menu links at the top) look
discordant, the lack of contrast between the brown backgrounds and
darker brown text may make the content hard to read for some users
(I'd suggesting using coffee text on white instead of brown text
on brown), and the icons in the left-hand navigation menu look too
randomly generic.

Sorry that's harsh, but I hope it helps.

--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
mailto:memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*** 



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

[WSG] Website review : http://webprocafe.com

2009-01-16 Thread Stewart Griffiths
All,

Please can you provide feedback on the following website
http://webprocafe.com/

We are looking for thoughts on the design and usability of the site, plus
any general feedback you want to provide.

Thanks all,

Stew

-- Forwarded message --
From: russ - maxdesign r...@maxdesign.com.au
Date: 2009/1/9
Subject: Re: website review
To: Stewart Griffiths stewartmgriffi...@gmail.com


Hi Stewart,

Sounds fine, as long as you phrase your request clearly to the group ­ ie,
what you are asking them to review.

Good luck with the launch!
Thanks
Russ
---
Russ Weakley
Max Design
Phone: (02) 9410 2521
Mobile: 0403 433 980
Email: r...@maxdesign.com.au
Skype: russ-maxdesign
MSN: r...@maxdesign.com.au
Website: http://www.maxdesign.com.au/
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/russweakley
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/maxdesign/
---




on 10/1/09 12:33 AM, Stewart Griffiths at wrote:

 Peter, Russ,

 I see that the list allows website reviews. We are just about to launch a
new
 forum and would like to ask the group their opinion.

 However, the site is a web design and development forum and I did not want
to
 send it around without contacting you first, as it may be misconstrued as
 selfless promotion.

 Please let me know your thoughts.

 Thanks,

 Stew



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***


Re: [WSG] Website review : http://webprocafe.com

2009-01-16 Thread Matthew Pennell
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Stewart Griffiths 
stewartmgriffi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Please can you provide feedback on the following website
 http://webprocafe.com/

 We are looking for thoughts on the design and usability of the site, plus
 any general feedback you want to provide.


Design, Development, Coffee ...?

- Matthew


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] Website review : http://webprocafe.com

2009-01-16 Thread Christian Montoya
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Stewart Griffiths
stewartmgriffi...@gmail.com wrote:
 All,

 Please can you provide feedback on the following website
 http://webprocafe.com/

 We are looking for thoughts on the design and usability of the site, plus
 any general feedback you want to provide.

The sub-nav bar (register, faq, members list) could be combined into a
vertical list and sit in the row above it, between the site title and
the login form. As it is, it's very awkward.

Also, there's a billion links on the page that all point to
webprocafe.com... the two title images, the navigation sections, etc.
Why so many? It takes attention away from the other links.

-- 
--
Christian Montoya
mappdev.com :: christianmontoya.net


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] Website review : http://webprocafe.com

2009-01-16 Thread Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

On 16/1/09 16:41, Stewart Griffiths wrote:

Please can you provide feedback on the following website
http://webprocafe.com/

We are looking for thoughts on the design and usability of the site,
plus any general feedback you want to provide.


Hmm.

Just looked at the homepage.

Pointless XHTML formedness errors, lack of heading elements, table 
layouts, presentational markup, inline styles, obtrusive JavaScript, 
unnecessary browser detection, presentational class names, and a layout 
that begins to break with only two text size steps up (at least in 
Safari) may be byproducts of vBulletin but they undercut the site's 
ostensible purpose of discussing professional web development in a way 
that I find hard to overlook given you've adopted a self-hosted solution 
for the forum.


More subjectively, I think the random bits of sans-serif (menu links at 
the side and some of the menu links at the top) look discordant, the 
lack of contrast between the brown backgrounds and darker brown text may 
make the content hard to read for some users (I'd suggesting using 
coffee text on white instead of brown text on brown), and the icons in 
the left-hand navigation menu look too randomly generic.


Sorry that's harsh, but I hope it helps.

--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] Website review : http://webprocafe.com

2009-01-16 Thread Stewart Griffiths
Thanks Chris, we will look at that now.

Stew

2009/1/16 Christian Montoya siro...@gmail.com

 On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Stewart Griffiths
 stewartmgriffi...@gmail.com wrote:
  All,
 
  Please can you provide feedback on the following website
  http://webprocafe.com/
 
  We are looking for thoughts on the design and usability of the site, plus
  any general feedback you want to provide.

 The sub-nav bar (register, faq, members list) could be combined into a
 vertical list and sit in the row above it, between the site title and
 the login form. As it is, it's very awkward.

 Also, there's a billion links on the page that all point to
 webprocafe.com... the two title images, the navigation sections, etc.
 Why so many? It takes attention away from the other links.

 --
 --
 Christian Montoya
 mappdev.com :: christianmontoya.net


 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] Website review : http://webprocafe.com

2009-01-16 Thread Andrew Maben

On 16/1/09 16:41, Stewart Griffiths wrote:

Please can you provide feedback on the following website
http://webprocafe.com/

We are looking for thoughts on the design and usability of the site,
plus any general feedback you want to provide.


In the header I see Design, Development, Coffee  [something that  
breaks to the next line and is hidden behind the nav bar]


+1 Benjamin's comments

Subjectively: underwhelmed by the level of professionalism in a site  
apparently aimed at pros (but I do still dream that pro might be  
short for proficient, not just professional. Sadly it seems to me  
that in this field the word professional is applied in the loosest  
possible sense. (Bear with me, this next is NOT an attack on you, or  
your site - you have at least had the humility and good sense to ask  
this group's opinion) but it seems to me that mercenary hack is far  
too often the more appropriate term.


OK rant over, w/ apologies to all...

Andrew

***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] Website review : http://webprocafe.com

2009-01-16 Thread Stewart Griffiths
Harsh is fine, it's a critique / review we asked for ;o)

Got rid of all but one error, which is a vb one, so will work on finding
that. As for breaking when the text is increased, well, as you state this is
due to the way vb spits out the code. But we can work on that going forward.
WE will look at the typography we are using and look to make it consistent
across the site, the background gradiants and the nav icons we will again
look at updating.

Thanks for the feedback, this is all great stuff.

Stew

2009/1/16 Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis bhawkesle...@googlemail.com

 On 16/1/09 16:41, Stewart Griffiths wrote:

 Please can you provide feedback on the following website
 http://webprocafe.com/

 We are looking for thoughts on the design and usability of the site,
 plus any general feedback you want to provide.


 Hmm.

 Just looked at the homepage.

 Pointless XHTML formedness errors, lack of heading elements, table layouts,
 presentational markup, inline styles, obtrusive JavaScript, unnecessary
 browser detection, presentational class names, and a layout that begins to
 break with only two text size steps up (at least in Safari) may be
 byproducts of vBulletin but they undercut the site's ostensible purpose of
 discussing professional web development in a way that I find hard to
 overlook given you've adopted a self-hosted solution for the forum.

 More subjectively, I think the random bits of sans-serif (menu links at the
 side and some of the menu links at the top) look discordant, the lack of
 contrast between the brown backgrounds and darker brown text may make the
 content hard to read for some users (I'd suggesting using coffee text on
 white instead of brown text on brown), and the icons in the left-hand
 navigation menu look too randomly generic.

 Sorry that's harsh, but I hope it helps.

 --
 Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis



 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] Website Review

2005-03-22 Thread jrcherry
Since the only reply to my query about the practice of hiding link targets was
from Olajide Olaolorun himself

 It is from Google. My host requires me to put it there in exchange for
 the free hosting :)

It must be that everyone accepts it.

John Cherry.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Website Review

2005-03-22 Thread Bert Doorn
 It must be that everyone accepts it.
Maybe...  Although I doubt it.
I don't like sites that interfere with my normal browser 
settings.  I often look at the status bar before clicking on a 
link.  If the target is hidden, it's probably not worth visiting.

Luckily this particular nuisance is a non-issue for me with 
Firefox.  I have it set to not allow scripts to hide the status 
bar or change status bar text, resize windows, etc.

Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Website Review

2005-03-22 Thread Olajide Olaolorun
I also hate hideen links but those links are from Google and it is a
JS script which i have no idea how it is generated or how to make it
as a popup i hate it because when it is clicked it navigates away
from the website.

Thangs Guys... :)


On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:04:54 +0800, Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   It must be that everyone accepts it.
 
 Maybe...  Although I doubt it.
 
 I don't like sites that interfere with my normal browser
 settings.  I often look at the status bar before clicking on a
 link.  If the target is hidden, it's probably not worth visiting.
 
 Luckily this particular nuisance is a non-issue for me with
 Firefox.  I have it set to not allow scripts to hide the status
 bar or change status bar text, resize windows, etc.
 
 Regards
 --
 Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
 http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
 Fast-loading, user-friendly websites
 
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 


-- 
Best Regards, 
Olajide Olaolorun @ www.olajideolaolorun.com
...ain't nothing impossible unless you make it...
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Website Review

2005-03-21 Thread Olajide Olaolorun
It is from Google. My host requires me to put it there in exchange for
the free hosting :)


On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:13:09 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Can I get some opinions on the practice of hiding link targets?
 
 When I hover near the sponsored links in http://www.uniformserver.com/ the
 target of the link doesn't appear in the status bar.
 
 I'm not really complaining about this particular site, but I tried something
 similar a while ago, with a bit of Javascript, and then realised it might be
 construed as concealing something from the surfer.
 
 I found it irritating that a link could take me to somewhere I don't want to 
 go.
 
 Is it a good practice?
 
 -- John.
 
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 


-- 
Best Regards, 
Olajide Olaolorun @ www.olajideolaolorun.com
...ain't nothing impossible unless you make it...
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Website Review (prose.code215)

2005-03-20 Thread David Laakso
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:39:15 +1100, Johnno Shadbolt  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
...
And I must say, I like the results (www.prose.code215.com).
...
What do you think?
Safari 1.2 seems happy(static), but IE5.2 does not  
http://www.dlaakso.com/2524410.jpg.
In XP_SP2 IE6.0/FF1.0.1/Opera7.54u2 I get a little page shift on pages not  
deep enough to draw a scroll bar. The font-size toggle seems to work:  
however I had no luck with the background toggle. IE and FF render blue,  
underlined, links-- Opera renders neither. A little difficult bringing it  
up in FF-- got a 403/404 error first couple of times (inline styles?).
Would some lead make the prose easier to read?
Best,
~david

--
de gustibus non est disputandum
http://www.dlaakso.com/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


[WSG] Website Review

2005-03-20 Thread Olajide Olaolorun
Can you please review http://www.uniformserver.com and tell me what you think?

I would love to hear from you all...

Thanks


-- 
Best Regards, 
Olajide Olaolorun @ www.olajideolaolorun.com
...ain't nothing impossible unless you make it...
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Website Review

2005-03-20 Thread Wendy
Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
Can you please review http://www.uniformserver.com and tell me what you think?
I would love to hear from you all...
Thanks
On my Mac OS 9.2.2, in NN7, everything looks good except the 
sponsored links, which are not liquid - if the browser 
window is narrowed, they spill out the right side, while 
everything else adjusts.

On IE5.2, I'm afraid everything below the sponsored links 
scoots south, as though the sponsored links had a huge 
margin-bottom. The Ads by Google is cut off vertically.

Hope this is of some help. I'll check it in OS 10.3 when I 
reboot.

Wendy
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Website Review

2005-03-20 Thread Sigurd Magnusson
Hi,
Just a comment on layout;
When I went to the website, I immediately took an interest in the package 
and wanted to go to a download page, but I actually had difficulty locating 
it, which then raised my suspicions that it was still under development, 
especially when I went to 'Status' menu item, which has Uniform Server 
Development Status as the main heading in the content area.

I would suggest bumping in a new heading like Current version x.x available 
for download, with a sentance or two, including its release date (always 
promote your release date!) and the link over to sourceforge. Put this both 
on the homepage, and in the status page. Using some more graphics like 
Download version x.x now would also aid this.

Perhaps it was due to the fact there are three menus, and on the homepage 
they're all shouting I am the most important menu.

Anyway, now that I did find the download link, I am keen on trialing it :P
Siggy
- Original Message - 
From: Olajide Olaolorun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WSG wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 7:07 AM
Subject: [WSG] Website Review


Can you please review http://www.uniformserver.com and tell me what you 
think?

I would love to hear from you all...
Thanks
--
Best Regards,
Olajide Olaolorun @ www.olajideolaolorun.com
...ain't nothing impossible unless you make it...
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Website Review

2005-03-20 Thread Olajide Olaolorun
Thanks Wendy and Sigurd.

Wendy - Yes, it is true. The Google Ads spoild everything but i have
no choice in it because my host requires it. I hate ads! I think they
bring down the quality of websites but what can i do when i get full
free hosing and the whole 9 yards for just the Google Ads on the
website :D

Sigurd - True, I also noticed that and will fix it. I will add an
image, a Download image on the main page for people to easily see it
:)


-- 
Best Regards, 
Olajide Olaolorun @ www.olajideolaolorun.com
...ain't nothing impossible unless you make it...
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Website Review

2005-03-20 Thread jrcherry
Can I get some opinions on the practice of hiding link targets?   

When I hover near the sponsored links in http://www.uniformserver.com/ the
target of the link doesn't appear in the status bar.

I'm not really complaining about this particular site, but I tried something
similar a while ago, with a bit of Javascript, and then realised it might be
construed as concealing something from the surfer.

I found it irritating that a link could take me to somewhere I don't want to go.

Is it a good practice?

-- John.



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] Website Review (prose.code215)

2005-03-19 Thread Johnno Shadbolt
Hello,

I've had some free time over the past couple of days, so I thought why
not make a simple website, with a minimalistic design, just for kicks.

And I must say, I like the results (www.prose.code215.com).

I've tested it on a few browsers: Internet Explorer 6, Opera 6,
Firefox 1, Netscape 7, Lynx Text Browser (all on Windows), and all
show it perfectly.

I can't really find any bugs, but i'm sure there are some when using a Mac.

What do you think?

-- 
Johnno Shadbolt
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED], www.code215.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] Website Review - BRAZILIAN Portal

2005-01-25 Thread Genau Junior




Hi.

I did some fixes, after you comments.


http://www.meucarronoov.com.br


Please, i would appreciate more suggestions.


Thank tou.

Genau Jr
Webdesigner




**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**