Re: [wsjt-devel] CAT problems with FT817, FT857 and FT897
I just tested an FT-897 with a user yesterday and it's working fine in the latest hamlib. So hopefully whatever problem was being experienced has been fixed for the 817 and 897. Mike W9MDB On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 07:45:18 AM CDT, Bill Somerville wrote: Hi Mike, we have had one report of a failure which turned out to be a CAT baud rate setting issue. As far as I know it faithfully emulated the FT-817ND and that model can be used without change, surprisingly including the EEPROM reads that are used when being forced to use the FT-857 model backend. I would have thought that there are enough FT-818NDs out their with WSJT-X to say that there's no issue. Note I cannot say much about the FT-817ND backend as in the Hamlib shipped with WSJT-X v2.2.2 that model is broken as is the FT-897. 73 Bill G4WJS. On 02/07/2020 13:21, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: Bill..have you found the FT-818ND to be compatible with the FT-817ND backend? Perhaps should add that to the riglist so they don't feel like orphans. Mike W9MDB On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 07:15:04 AM CDT, Bill Somerville wrote: On 02/07/2020 13:02, Claude Frantz wrote: On 7/2/20 1:27 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: Many thanks, Bill ! there are several issues with that series of rigs (you can include the new FT-818ND in the list too), as there are with almost all rigs. All have workarounds, why are you asking please, that will help focus on how to answer? I do not have any rig from this series. I'm only asking in order to remain informed. I have observed many work, in the recent past. Thank you ! Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) Hi Claude, there are a few specific issues with CAT control of these rigs, which all essentially have identical CAT protocols. - The CAT command set is small and many rig functions cannot be queried or set. - There is no easy way to determine whether VFO A, VFO B, or memory is current, just a CAT command swap them over. The basic queries of frequency and mode simply return that of the current VFO or memory. - The CAT command to determine if the rig is in SEND mode does not work as advertised. - CAT commands to change frequency are rejected if the rig is in SEND mode, despite the fact that the rig can be tuned with the front panel VFO knob when transmitting. As I said, most rigs have a number of limitations and quirks, these ones are not particularly better or worse than others. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] CAT problems with FT817, FT857 and FT897
The FT-991 is in the list. Is there any particular problem with the FT-991A that would require changes? Mike W9MDB On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 08:39:14 AM CDT, N1trk Rob wrote: Michael, sorry. I rolled back windows 10. Wsjt x worked fine after that. The "list" would be the drop down list for rig set up in wsjt x. I also use a flex 6600 which has worked flawlessly with wsjt x every time. Thank you for all of your hard work.Robn1trk On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:25 AM Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: "get on the list" for what?When you say you rolled back to a previous version you mean Windows or WSJT-X? Mike W9MDB On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 08:12:33 AM CDT, N1trk Rob wrote: I use an ft991A, yaesu's most current rig in the hf/vhf line. I had a hamlib error after a windows update which of course happened Saturday morning of field day with no internet :). I rolled back to a previous version and fb. The yaesu ft 991 a has regularly been a bear to configure. Perhaps we could get on the list as well? (I have no programming experience worthwhile. [ I do remember error 19, semicolon expected] ) I truly appreciate all your hard and VOLUNTEER work, and graciously submit this for your consideration.73 robn1trk On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 8:45 AM Bill Somerville wrote: Hi Mike, we have had one report of a failure which turned out to be a CAT baud rate setting issue. As far as I know it faithfully emulated the FT-817ND and that model can be used without change, surprisingly including the EEPROM reads that are used when being forced to use the FT-857 model backend. I would have thought that there are enough FT-818NDs out their with WSJT-X to say that there's no issue. Note I cannot say much about the FT-817ND backend as in the Hamlib shipped with WSJT-X v2.2.2 that model is broken as is the FT-897. 73 Bill G4WJS. On 02/07/2020 13:21, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: Bill..have you found the FT-818ND to be compatible with the FT-817ND backend? Perhaps should add that to the riglist so they don't feel like orphans. Mike W9MDB On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 07:15:04 AM CDT, Bill Somerville wrote: On 02/07/2020 13:02, Claude Frantz wrote: On 7/2/20 1:27 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: Many thanks, Bill ! there are several issues with that series of rigs (you can include the new FT-818ND in the list too), as there are with almost all rigs. All have workarounds, why are you asking please, that will help focus on how to answer? I do not have any rig from this series. I'm only asking in order to remain informed. I have observed many work, in the recent past. Thank you ! Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) Hi Claude, there are a few specific issues with CAT control of these rigs, which all essentially have identical CAT protocols. - The CAT command set is small and many rig functions cannot be queried or set. - There is no easy way to determine whether VFO A, VFO B, or memory is current, just a CAT command swap them over. The basic queries of frequency and mode simply return that of the current VFO or memory. - The CAT command to determine if the rig is in SEND mode does not work as advertised. - CAT commands to change frequency are rejected if the rig is in SEND mode, despite the fact that the rig can be tuned with the front panel VFO knob when transmitting. As I said, most rigs have a number of limitations and quirks, these ones are not particularly better or worse than others. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] CAT problems with FT817, FT857 and FT897
Michael, sorry. I rolled back windows 10. Wsjt x worked fine after that. The "list" would be the drop down list for rig set up in wsjt x. I also use a flex 6600 which has worked flawlessly with wsjt x every time. Thank you for all of your hard work. Rob n1trk On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:25 AM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > "get on the list" for what? > When you say you rolled back to a previous version you mean Windows or > WSJT-X? > > Mike W9MDB > > > > > On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 08:12:33 AM CDT, N1trk Rob < > litchrob...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I use an ft991A, yaesu's most current rig in the hf/vhf line. I had a > hamlib error after a windows update which of course happened Saturday > morning of field day with no internet :). I rolled back to a previous > version and fb. The yaesu ft 991 a has regularly been a bear to > configure. Perhaps we could get on the list as well? (I have no > programming experience worthwhile. [ I do remember error 19, semicolon > expected] ) I truly appreciate all your hard and VOLUNTEER work, and > graciously submit this for your consideration. > 73 > rob > n1trk > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 8:45 AM Bill Somerville > wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > we have had one report of a failure which turned out to be a CAT baud rate > setting issue. As far as I know it faithfully emulated the FT-817ND and > that model can be used without change, surprisingly including the EEPROM > reads that are used when being forced to use the FT-857 model backend. I > would have thought that there are enough FT-818NDs out their with WSJT-X to > say that there's no issue. > > Note I cannot say much about the FT-817ND backend as in the Hamlib shipped > with WSJT-X v2.2.2 that model is broken as is the FT-897. > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS. > > On 02/07/2020 13:21, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: > > Bill..have you found the FT-818ND to be compatible with the FT-817ND > backend? > Perhaps should add that to the riglist so they don't feel like orphans. > > Mike W9MDB > > > > > On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 07:15:04 AM CDT, Bill Somerville > wrote: > > > On 02/07/2020 13:02, Claude Frantz wrote: > > On 7/2/20 1:27 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > > Many thanks, Bill ! > > there are several issues with that series of rigs (you can include the new > FT-818ND in the list too), as there are with almost all rigs. All have > workarounds, why are you asking please, that will help focus on how to > answer? > > > I do not have any rig from this series. I'm only asking in order to remain > informed. I have observed many work, in the recent past. > > Thank you ! > > Best wishes, > Claude (DJ0OT) > > Hi Claude, > > there are a few specific issues with CAT control of these rigs, which all > essentially have identical CAT protocols. > >- The CAT command set is small and many rig functions cannot be >queried or set. >- There is no easy way to determine whether VFO A, VFO B, or memory is >current, just a CAT command swap them over. The basic queries of frequency >and mode simply return that of the current VFO or memory. >- The CAT command to determine if the rig is in SEND mode does not >work as advertised. >- CAT commands to change frequency are rejected if the rig is in SEND >mode, despite the fact that the rig can be tuned with the front panel VFO >knob when transmitting. > > As I said, most rigs have a number of limitations and quirks, these ones > are not particularly better or worse than others. > > 73 > > Bill > > G4WJS. > > > ___ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > ___ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > ___ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] CAT problems with FT817, FT857 and FT897
"get on the list" for what?When you say you rolled back to a previous version you mean Windows or WSJT-X? Mike W9MDB On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 08:12:33 AM CDT, N1trk Rob wrote: I use an ft991A, yaesu's most current rig in the hf/vhf line. I had a hamlib error after a windows update which of course happened Saturday morning of field day with no internet :). I rolled back to a previous version and fb. The yaesu ft 991 a has regularly been a bear to configure. Perhaps we could get on the list as well? (I have no programming experience worthwhile. [ I do remember error 19, semicolon expected] ) I truly appreciate all your hard and VOLUNTEER work, and graciously submit this for your consideration.73 robn1trk On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 8:45 AM Bill Somerville wrote: Hi Mike, we have had one report of a failure which turned out to be a CAT baud rate setting issue. As far as I know it faithfully emulated the FT-817ND and that model can be used without change, surprisingly including the EEPROM reads that are used when being forced to use the FT-857 model backend. I would have thought that there are enough FT-818NDs out their with WSJT-X to say that there's no issue. Note I cannot say much about the FT-817ND backend as in the Hamlib shipped with WSJT-X v2.2.2 that model is broken as is the FT-897. 73 Bill G4WJS. On 02/07/2020 13:21, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: Bill..have you found the FT-818ND to be compatible with the FT-817ND backend? Perhaps should add that to the riglist so they don't feel like orphans. Mike W9MDB On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 07:15:04 AM CDT, Bill Somerville wrote: On 02/07/2020 13:02, Claude Frantz wrote: On 7/2/20 1:27 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: Many thanks, Bill ! there are several issues with that series of rigs (you can include the new FT-818ND in the list too), as there are with almost all rigs. All have workarounds, why are you asking please, that will help focus on how to answer? I do not have any rig from this series. I'm only asking in order to remain informed. I have observed many work, in the recent past. Thank you ! Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) Hi Claude, there are a few specific issues with CAT control of these rigs, which all essentially have identical CAT protocols. - The CAT command set is small and many rig functions cannot be queried or set. - There is no easy way to determine whether VFO A, VFO B, or memory is current, just a CAT command swap them over. The basic queries of frequency and mode simply return that of the current VFO or memory. - The CAT command to determine if the rig is in SEND mode does not work as advertised. - CAT commands to change frequency are rejected if the rig is in SEND mode, despite the fact that the rig can be tuned with the front panel VFO knob when transmitting. As I said, most rigs have a number of limitations and quirks, these ones are not particularly better or worse than others. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] CAT problems with FT817, FT857 and FT897
On 7/2/20 2:11 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: there are several issues with that series of rigs (you can include the new FT-818ND in the list too), as there are with almost all rigs. All have workarounds, why are you asking please, that will help focus on how to answer? Many thanks again, Bill ! Just an additional question: Is the FT-991(A) concerned too ? Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] CAT problems with FT817, FT857 and FT897
I use an ft991A, yaesu's most current rig in the hf/vhf line. I had a hamlib error after a windows update which of course happened Saturday morning of field day with no internet :). I rolled back to a previous version and fb. The yaesu ft 991 a has regularly been a bear to configure. Perhaps we could get on the list as well? (I have no programming experience worthwhile. [ I do remember error 19, semicolon expected] ) I truly appreciate all your hard and VOLUNTEER work, and graciously submit this for your consideration. 73 rob n1trk On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 8:45 AM Bill Somerville wrote: > Hi Mike, > > we have had one report of a failure which turned out to be a CAT baud rate > setting issue. As far as I know it faithfully emulated the FT-817ND and > that model can be used without change, surprisingly including the EEPROM > reads that are used when being forced to use the FT-857 model backend. I > would have thought that there are enough FT-818NDs out their with WSJT-X to > say that there's no issue. > > Note I cannot say much about the FT-817ND backend as in the Hamlib shipped > with WSJT-X v2.2.2 that model is broken as is the FT-897. > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS. > > On 02/07/2020 13:21, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: > > Bill..have you found the FT-818ND to be compatible with the FT-817ND > backend? > Perhaps should add that to the riglist so they don't feel like orphans. > > Mike W9MDB > > > > > On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 07:15:04 AM CDT, Bill Somerville > wrote: > > > On 02/07/2020 13:02, Claude Frantz wrote: > > On 7/2/20 1:27 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > > Many thanks, Bill ! > > there are several issues with that series of rigs (you can include the new > FT-818ND in the list too), as there are with almost all rigs. All have > workarounds, why are you asking please, that will help focus on how to > answer? > > > I do not have any rig from this series. I'm only asking in order to remain > informed. I have observed many work, in the recent past. > > Thank you ! > > Best wishes, > Claude (DJ0OT) > > Hi Claude, > > there are a few specific issues with CAT control of these rigs, which all > essentially have identical CAT protocols. > >- The CAT command set is small and many rig functions cannot be >queried or set. >- There is no easy way to determine whether VFO A, VFO B, or memory is >current, just a CAT command swap them over. The basic queries of frequency >and mode simply return that of the current VFO or memory. >- The CAT command to determine if the rig is in SEND mode does not >work as advertised. >- CAT commands to change frequency are rejected if the rig is in SEND >mode, despite the fact that the rig can be tuned with the front panel VFO >knob when transmitting. > > As I said, most rigs have a number of limitations and quirks, these ones > are not particularly better or worse than others. > > 73 > > Bill > > G4WJS. > > > ___ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] CAT problems with FT817, FT857 and FT897
Hi Mike, we have had one report of a failure which turned out to be a CAT baud rate setting issue. As far as I know it faithfully emulated the FT-817ND and that model can be used without change, surprisingly including the EEPROM reads that are used when being forced to use the FT-857 model backend. I would have thought that there are enough FT-818NDs out their with WSJT-X to say that there's no issue. Note I cannot say much about the FT-817ND backend as in the Hamlib shipped with WSJT-X v2.2.2 that model is broken as is the FT-897. 73 Bill G4WJS. On 02/07/2020 13:21, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: Bill..have you found the FT-818ND to be compatible with the FT-817ND backend? Perhaps should add that to the riglist so they don't feel like orphans. Mike W9MDB On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 07:15:04 AM CDT, Bill Somerville wrote: On 02/07/2020 13:02, Claude Frantz wrote: On 7/2/20 1:27 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: Many thanks, Bill ! there are several issues with that series of rigs (you can include the new FT-818ND in the list too), as there are with almost all rigs. All have workarounds, why are you asking please, that will help focus on how to answer? I do not have any rig from this series. I'm only asking in order to remain informed. I have observed many work, in the recent past. Thank you ! Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) Hi Claude, there are a few specific issues with CAT control of these rigs, which all essentially have identical CAT protocols. * The CAT command set is small and many rig functions cannot be queried or set. * There is no easy way to determine whether VFO A, VFO B, or memory is current, just a CAT command swap them over. The basic queries of frequency and mode simply return that of the current VFO or memory. * The CAT command to determine if the rig is in SEND mode does not work as advertised. * CAT commands to change frequency are rejected if the rig is in SEND mode, despite the fact that the rig can be tuned with the front panel VFO knob when transmitting. As I said, most rigs have a number of limitations and quirks, these ones are not particularly better or worse than others. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] CAT problems with FT817, FT857 and FT897
Bill..have you found the FT-818ND to be compatible with the FT-817ND backend?Perhaps should add that to the riglist so they don't feel like orphans. Mike W9MDB On Thursday, July 2, 2020, 07:15:04 AM CDT, Bill Somerville wrote: On 02/07/2020 13:02, Claude Frantz wrote: On 7/2/20 1:27 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: Many thanks, Bill ! there are several issues with that series of rigs (you can include the new FT-818ND in the list too), as there are with almost all rigs. All have workarounds, why are you asking please, that will help focus on how to answer? I do not have any rig from this series. I'm only asking in order to remain informed. I have observed many work, in the recent past. Thank you ! Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) Hi Claude, there are a few specific issues with CAT control of these rigs, which all essentially have identical CAT protocols. - The CAT command set is small and many rig functions cannot be queried or set. - There is no easy way to determine whether VFO A, VFO B, or memory is current, just a CAT command swap them over. The basic queries of frequency and mode simply return that of the current VFO or memory. - The CAT command to determine if the rig is in SEND mode does not work as advertised. - CAT commands to change frequency are rejected if the rig is in SEND mode, despite the fact that the rig can be tuned with the front panel VFO knob when transmitting. As I said, most rigs have a number of limitations and quirks, these ones are not particularly better or worse than others. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] CAT problems with FT817, FT857 and FT897
On 02/07/2020 13:02, Claude Frantz wrote: On 7/2/20 1:27 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: Many thanks, Bill ! there are several issues with that series of rigs (you can include the new FT-818ND in the list too), as there are with almost all rigs. All have workarounds, why are you asking please, that will help focus on how to answer? I do not have any rig from this series. I'm only asking in order to remain informed. I have observed many work, in the recent past. Thank you ! Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) Hi Claude, there are a few specific issues with CAT control of these rigs, which all essentially have identical CAT protocols. * The CAT command set is small and many rig functions cannot be queried or set. * There is no easy way to determine whether VFO A, VFO B, or memory is current, just a CAT command swap them over. The basic queries of frequency and mode simply return that of the current VFO or memory. * The CAT command to determine if the rig is in SEND mode does not work as advertised. * CAT commands to change frequency are rejected if the rig is in SEND mode, despite the fact that the rig can be tuned with the front panel VFO knob when transmitting. As I said, most rigs have a number of limitations and quirks, these ones are not particularly better or worse than others. 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] CAT problems with FT817, FT857 and FT897
On 7/2/20 1:27 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: Many thanks, Bill ! there are several issues with that series of rigs (you can include the new FT-818ND in the list too), as there are with almost all rigs. All have workarounds, why are you asking please, that will help focus on how to answer? I do not have any rig from this series. I'm only asking in order to remain informed. I have observed many work, in the recent past. Thank you ! Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] CAT problems with FT817, FT857 and FT897
On 02/07/2020 09:28, Claude Frantz wrote: Hi all, Can anyone here give us a short but precise description of the problems related to the equipment mentioned in the subject, please ? Thanks you ! Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) Hi Claude, there are several issues with that series of rigs (you can include the new FT-818ND in the list too), as there are with almost all rigs. All have workarounds, why are you asking please, that will help focus on how to answer? 73 Bill G4WJS. ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] CAT problems with FT817, FT857 and FT897
Claude, There issues in some cases are wide and various but based primarily around some "byte dropouts" and acknowledgement-of-commands. As an example, an issue that is currently being investigated relates to acknowledgement of commands (i.e. intermittently 3 bytes returned rather than the expected 5). To quote Mike, he is like 'a dog with a bone' when it comes to understanding and resolving issues. Some issues may just be hardware and may only be possibly resolved by reporting issues to Linux and hardware developers too ! Great technicians and engineers are working on issues but working through issues can and does take time especially when you are maintaining generic libraries. If you are having concerns with the FT-8x7 range of radios (and it seems to be limited at this stage to non-Windows builds) then pull Hamlib from the "master" repo at Github rather than the WSJTX-standardised G4WJS distribution that the developers here have mated the release to. It is critical that any issues/concerns be reported via the Hamlib lists. Here are the build scripts needed (based on the INSTALL file packaged in wsjtx.tar) that just worked 100% (after dependencies were resolved for Ubuntu Linux 20.04: For HAMLIB based off the MASTER Hamlib Repo (and for the intent of this forum use this repo ONLY if you are experiencing issues with Hamlib comms) as a test: mkdir ~/hamlib-prefix cd ~/hamlib-prefix git clone https://github.com/Hamlib/Hamlib.git src <<== Change here cd src <<== There is no "integration" distro to checkout so this is removed ./bootstrap mkdir ../build cd ../build ../src/configure --prefix=$HOME/hamlib-prefix \ --disable-shared --enable-static \ --without-cxx-binding --disable-winradio \ CFLAGS="-g -O2 -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections" \ LDFLAGS="-Wl,--gc-sections" make make install-strip For WSJTX based off the SourceForge Repo: mkdir -p ~/wsjtx-prefix/build cd ~/wsjtx-prefix git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjtx src cd ~/wsjtx-prefix/build cmake -D CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=~/hamlib-prefix -DWSJT_SKIP_MANPAGES=ON -DWSJT_GENERATE_DOCS=OFF ../src cmake --build . sudo cmake --build . --target install Also for the core developers: For the next source release, can the INSTALL files packaged at the top level of the tarball/within the "wsjtx.tar" tarball also be made consistent across the entire package i.e. update/incorporate the changes in the WSJT-X Linux build script shown above - referenced in the TOP LEVEL INSTALL file but not appearing in the INSTALL file packaged in wsjtx.tar? Further to this, can some of the references in these valuable INSTALL documents please also be updated and made consistent with current releases (and PM me back developers if you would like me to assist)? Thanks to all developers, and 73. Steve I VK3VM / VK3SIR -Original Message- From: Claude Frantz Sent: Thursday, 2 July 2020 6:28 PM To: WSJT software development Subject: [wsjt-devel] CAT problems with FT817, FT857 and FT897 Hi all, Can anyone here give us a short but precise description of the problems related to the equipment mentioned in the subject, please ? Thanks you ! Best wishes, Claude (DJ0OT) ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
