Re: [zones-discuss] Setting up SMC on a zone - possible?
Anne Moore wrote: > Okay, that's good information. I can then install it manually and things > should work. I'll try in the morning. You could perhaps install all of the contents of that package (plus any other packages that are required and similarly situated), and that might well work. I'm pretty sure that you could _not_ install the package. The SUNW_PKG_ALLZONES and SUNW_PKG_HOLLOW markings on it will, I believe, cause it to be rejected on local zones. ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] Setting up SMC on a zone - possible?
Jordan Brown (Sun) wrote: > You could perhaps install all of the contents of that package (plus any > other packages that are required and similarly situated), and that might > well work. ... but it would of course not be a supported configuration. ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] Setting up SMC on a zone - possible?
Okay, that's good information. I can then install it manually and things should work. I'll try in the morning. Thanks Anne -Original Message- From: Jordan Brown (Sun) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:26 PM To: Anne Moore Cc: 'Paul Kraus'; zones-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Setting up SMC on a zone - possible? Anne Moore wrote: > Thanks for the reply. I am talking about the Solaris Management > Console. I have a whole-root zone and those two services are running. > However, there is no /usr/sbin/smc in my whole-root zone. It's like > the whole-root installation didn't even install it. Very odd. SUNWmcc, which is the package that includes /usr/sbin/smc, is for some reason marked "hollow", that its contents should be installed only on the global zone, but the package should appear for bookkeeping purposes in local zones. Why this is I could not tell you, but it does explain why /usr/sbin/smc is not installed in your zone. ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] Setting up SMC on a zone - possible?
Anne Moore wrote: > Thanks for the reply. I am talking about the Solaris Management Console. I > have a whole-root zone and those two services are running. However, there is > no /usr/sbin/smc in my whole-root zone. It's like the whole-root > installation didn't even install it. Very odd. SUNWmcc, which is the package that includes /usr/sbin/smc, is for some reason marked "hollow", that its contents should be installed only on the global zone, but the package should appear for bookkeeping purposes in local zones. Why this is I could not tell you, but it does explain why /usr/sbin/smc is not installed in your zone. ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] Setting up SMC on a zone - possible?
Pual
Thanks for the reply. I am talking about the Solaris Management Console. I
have a whole-root zone and those two services are running. However, there is
no /usr/sbin/smc in my whole-root zone. It's like the whole-root
installation didn't even install it. Very odd.
Any idea, besides these two services, on how to get this working? It seems
there must be a way to mount the global zone /usr/sbin/smc into the local
zone and then successfully launch it from there?
Anne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Kraus
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 11:34 AM
To: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Setting up SMC on a zone - possible?
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Anne Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Does anyone know how to setup and run Solaris Management Console on a
> whole-root zone? I've searched quite a bit online, but can't seem to
> find the procedure for it.
We run the Solaris Management Console on at least one sparse zone,
so it should just work on a whole root zone. Be aware that there are at
least two services (SMF) that need to be running for it to work. I set it up
months ago and don't remember the specifics ...
svc:/application/management/sma:default and
svc:/application/management/wbem:default I *think* were the two I needed.
Now, if you are talking about the Sun Management Center console, I
was never able to get it (under 3.6.1) to install and run in a Non-Global
Zone of any type. The server ran fine in a Whole Root Zone, but the
installer refused to install just the console component in an NG Zone.
--
{1-2-3-4-5-6-7--
---}
Paul Kraus
-> Facilities Coordinator, Albacon 2008
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] DNS Question "DNS better off in Global Zone or in local zones"
Moin! On Apr 23, 2008, at 17:27 , Sanjay Akula wrote: > I have a question on DNS, Is it better to be DNS on Global-zone > rather than >in localzone? >I would like to know the pros and cons of DNS to be in global > zone than >local zone. Pl. suggest me Well the answer is very straightforward (at least for me). DNS is a service that doesn't require the global zone, so it is better in a non- global zone. We run all of our DNS servers in non-global zonse. Especially for security this is a good thing, as well known DNS servers have security vulnerabilities form time to time. In the case of a non global zone only the zone is compromised and the attacker can't penetrate as deep as he could in a global zone. So long -Ralf ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
[zones-discuss] DNS Question "DNS better off in Global Zone or in local zones"
Hi Users, I have a question on DNS, Is it better to be DNS on Global-zone rather than in localzone? I would like to know the pros and cons of DNS to be in global zone than local zone. Pl. suggest me -- -- Regards, SysAdmin ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
