Re: [Zope-dev] cvs.zope.org/Products - svn.zope.org?
--On 17. April 2006 16:25:10 +0200 Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wouldn't it make sense to migrate the complete Products hierarchy from cvs.zope.org to svn.zope.org? - -1 on migrating everything. IMHO it would be better to identify those dependencies and selectively migrate products as needed. I'd volunteer to do the migrations, I have a well-working test harness and migration scripts for that purpose on the cvs.zope.org box. We must distinguish between major community projects and private/commercial projects. If you want to support both we might end up having most of the stuff on svn.zope.org as well... Andreas -- ZOPYX Ltd. Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376 E-Publishing, Python, Zope Plone development, Consulting pgpHINWXWL9gF.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: Is there a function to get the object type?
Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lennart Regebro wrote: On 4/11/06, Takahashi, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to write a function that checks to see if the current object is a 'Folder'. several ways: isinstance(object, Folder) # does not work in python scripts\ Don't forget 'sametype' inside PythonScripts: sametype(object, another_object) You mean same_type ;) -- Thank you and Cheers, Suresh V. CTO, ParTecs, Bangalore http://www.partecs.com Plone-Zope-Python Consulting ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] cvs.zope.org/Products - svn.zope.org?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18 Apr 2006, at 08:30, Andreas Jung wrote: --On 17. April 2006 16:25:10 +0200 Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wouldn't it make sense to migrate the complete Products hierarchy from cvs.zope.org to svn.zope.org? - -1 on migrating everything. IMHO it would be better to identify those dependencies and selectively migrate products as needed. I'd volunteer to do the migrations, I have a well-working test harness and migration scripts for that purpose on the cvs.zope.org box. We must distinguish between major community projects and private/ commercial projects. If you want to support both we might end up having most of the stuff on svn.zope.org as well... Have you looked at what's inside the Products folder on cvs.zope.org? The important bits are already moved to SVN and then there's a whole lot of old unmaintained stuff. Now that I looked at what's in there I am even more against a wholesale move. I'm assuming the reason you started this discussion is because you had to fish something out of CVS. We could start by you identifying what that was. jens -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFERJbSRAx5nvEhZLIRAslrAJ4kDbIRw1/5l+yyc6j4x0fuWTCvYACdFISH ORbGazbvlNa7OEdGvWFIByE= =ribv -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Re: 64-bit BTrees
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: in memory. Dieter estimates 20% to 35% slowdown for the C algorithms (whatever that means), Tim seems to think it won't have such a big effect. I guess we'll only know after some benchmarks. Can we please not make any definite decisions until this issue has been resolved, some of us do actually care about performance ;-) Yes, ideally, I'd like to see just IIBTree's but only if there are not perfomance implications. I think BTrees sit low enough in the stack that it's perfectly justifiable to have both an I BTree and an L BTree. If having two isn't acceptable, then why do we have an I and O BTree's, not to mention the special ones used for in-memory ZODB indexes? Surely we should just have one BTree class? cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Debugging spinning Zope?
http://www.zope.org/Members/4am/debugspinningzope On 18. Apr 2006, at 16:45, Morten W. Petersen wrote: Hi, I have a problem with a Zope that hangs eating up 99.9% of the CPU. I've tried to debug the problem by using DeadlockDebugger but that doesn't even return when accessing it. I guess the next step is to use pdb og gdb - are there perhaps any documents out there describing the process? TIA, Morten -- Anything that happens, happens. --Douglas Adams ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Traversal issue which affects Five
Alec Mitchell wrote at 2006-4-17 14:53 -0700: ... Yes, it does sound like a better solution. However, the issue I see with it is that it is essentially adding new functionality, rather than fixing a problem with the existing behavior. That would seem to make it a much less likely candidate for getting into zope 2.8.7 (which is important IMHO), despite the fact that it is a bit more elegant It is a new functionality -- but one that does nothing until it is used and only for those applications (like five:traversal) that use it. Thus, even a strict release manager might accept it. -- Dieter ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Debugging spinning Zope?
Dieter Maurer wrote: Morten W. Petersen wrote at 2006-4-18 16:45 +0200: I guess the next step is to use pdb og gdb - are there perhaps any documents out there describing the process? You use your favorite search engine and search for Zope spinning debug. Yep. ;) -Morten ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Traversal issue which affects Five
--On 18. April 2006 18:52:10 +0200 Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alec Mitchell wrote at 2006-4-17 14:53 -0700: ... Yes, it does sound like a better solution. However, the issue I see with it is that it is essentially adding new functionality, rather than fixing a problem with the existing behavior. That would seem to make it a much less likely candidate for getting into zope 2.8.7 (which is important IMHO), despite the fact that it is a bit more elegant It is a new functionality -- but one that does nothing until it is used and only for those applications (like five:traversal) that use it. Thus, even a strict release manager might accept it. Am I strict? :-) Andreas pgpUImvsRhSjW.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Debugging spinning Zope?
Previously Stefan H. Holek wrote: http://www.zope.org/Members/4am/debugspinningzope And now for windows... :) Wichert. On 18. Apr 2006, at 16:45, Morten W. Petersen wrote: Hi, I have a problem with a Zope that hangs eating up 99.9% of the CPU. I've tried to debug the problem by using DeadlockDebugger but that doesn't even return when accessing it. I guess the next step is to use pdb og gdb - are there perhaps any documents out there describing the process? TIA, Morten -- Anything that happens, happens. --Douglas Adams ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) -- Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Re: z3 server+publication refactor for z2
FYI there was a couple of hours work done on this today at the sprint in Paris. It seemed to us the the next necessary step in Sidneis branch was to make Zope2 traversal adapters for non-zope3 objects. This work has now started, in the form of refactoring the BaseRequest traversal into Zope3 type traversal chunks that we can make adapters of. Current problem: getRole is called with the entry_name unless the subobject was gotten via a getitem interface, when it's called with None. As we want to do the getRole part outside of the name traversal, we don't know in which way the name was gotten. So we need to solve that tomorrow somehow. You can check the current status work at http://svn.zope.org/Zope/branches/easter-sprint_traversal-refactor/ ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
