Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19

2013-02-26 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:54:01AM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
  [5]winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
  [6]winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
 
 There's this lovely bit at the beginning I don't remember from before,
 but it's not counted as a test failure:
 
 ZopeXMLConfigurationError: File 
 c:\buildslave\z3c.contents\build\src\z3c\contents\ftesting.zcml, line 
 41.2-41.32
 ZopeXMLConfigurationError: File 
 c:\eggs\z3c.form-3.0.0a1-py2.6.egg\z3c\form\configure.zcml, line 37.2-37.51
 WindowsError: [Error 3] The system cannot find the path specified: 
 u'c:\\eggs\\z3c.form-3.0.0a1-py2.6.egg\\z3c\\form\\locales\\*.*'
...
  [11]   winbot / z3c.layer.ready2go_py_265_32
  [12]   winbot / z3c.layer.ready2go_py_265_32
 
 ZopeXMLConfigurationError: File 
 c:\buildslave\z3c.layer.ready2go\build\src\z3c\layer\ready2go\ftesting.zcml,
  line 62.2-62.32
 ZopeXMLConfigurationError: File 
 c:\eggs\z3c.form-3.0.0a1-py2.6.egg\z3c\form\configure.zcml, line 37.2-37.51
 WindowsError: [Error 3] The system cannot find the path specified: 
 u'c:\\eggs\\z3c.form-3.0.0a1-py2.6.egg\\z3c\\form\\locales\\*.*'
 
 Okay, this does cause a test failure.  Scratch that, a layer setup
 failure.
 
 Broken z3c.form release that's missing some locales?  Some packages have
 special build steps (compile *.mo or something) before you're supposed
 to do setup.py sdist register upload.

I've released z3c.form 3.0.0a2 with the missing locale files.

Looks like it was a simple case of an incomplete MANIFEST.in

  [13]   winbot / z3c.recipe.paster_py_265_32
 
 Error: Couldn't find a distribution for 'beautifulsoup4'.

Fixed.

Marius three fixes before breakfast Gedminas
-- 
http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19

2013-02-26 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:54:01AM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
  [5]winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
  [6]winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
 
 There's this lovely bit at the beginning I don't remember from before,
 but it's not counted as a test failure:
 
 ZopeXMLConfigurationError: File 
 c:\buildslave\z3c.contents\build\src\z3c\contents\ftesting.zcml, line 
 41.2-41.32
 ZopeXMLConfigurationError: File 
 c:\eggs\z3c.form-3.0.0a1-py2.6.egg\z3c\form\configure.zcml, line 37.2-37.51
 WindowsError: [Error 3] The system cannot find the path specified: 
 u'c:\\eggs\\z3c.form-3.0.0a1-py2.6.egg\\z3c\\form\\locales\\*.*'
 
 and then we have the form id name vs form name id in README.txt that
 I cannot reproduce.

Figured out why: I need to

  bin/buildout -n buildout:prefer-final=true

and then I can reproduce this fine.

  [9]winbot / z3c.jsonrpc_py_265_32
  [10]   winbot / z3c.jsontree_py_265_32
 
 Same old Invalid request id returned.

Because request ID is None in the response, and there's an error message
in the JSON about 'TypeError: expecting a bytes object, got unicode'.

This error is caused by zope.publisher 4.0.0a1:

  bin/buildout -n buildout:prefer-final=false buildout:versions=versions \
   versions:zope.publisher='4.0.0a1' \
   versions:zope.session='4.0.0a1'  bin/test -pvc

makes the test pass, while

  bin/buildout -n buildout:prefer-final=false buildout:versions=versions \
   versions:zope.publisher='4.0.0a1' \
   versions:zope.session='4.0.0a1'  bin/test -pvc

makes them fail.

Marius Gedminas
-- 
http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19

2013-02-26 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:41:02PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:54:01AM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
   [5]winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
   [6]winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
  
  There's this lovely bit at the beginning I don't remember from before,
  but it's not counted as a test failure:
  
  ZopeXMLConfigurationError: File 
  c:\buildslave\z3c.contents\build\src\z3c\contents\ftesting.zcml, line 
  41.2-41.32
  ZopeXMLConfigurationError: File 
  c:\eggs\z3c.form-3.0.0a1-py2.6.egg\z3c\form\configure.zcml, line 
  37.2-37.51
  WindowsError: [Error 3] The system cannot find the path specified: 
  u'c:\\eggs\\z3c.form-3.0.0a1-py2.6.egg\\z3c\\form\\locales\\*.*'
  
  and then we have the form id name vs form name id in README.txt that
  I cannot reproduce.
 
 Figured out why: I need to
 
   bin/buildout -n buildout:prefer-final=true
 
 and then I can reproduce this fine.

Fixed.

   [9]winbot / z3c.jsonrpc_py_265_32
   [10]   winbot / z3c.jsontree_py_265_32
  
  Same old Invalid request id returned.
 
 Because request ID is None in the response, and there's an error message
 in the JSON about 'TypeError: expecting a bytes object, got unicode'.
 
 This error is caused by zope.publisher 4.0.0a1:
 
   bin/buildout -n buildout:prefer-final=false buildout:versions=versions \
versions:zope.publisher='4.0.0a1' \
versions:zope.session='4.0.0a1'  bin/test -pvc
 
 makes the test pass, while
 
   bin/buildout -n buildout:prefer-final=false buildout:versions=versions \
versions:zope.publisher='4.0.0a1' \
versions:zope.session='4.0.0a1'  bin/test -pvc
 
 makes them fail.

Not fixed: going to lunch.

(also, I need to review the changes in zope.publisher to see why it
started complaining _now_)

Marius Gedminas
-- 
http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0 process

2013-02-26 Thread Stephan Richter
Hi everyone,

what is the process to start working on ZTK 2.0? We are about 5-6 packages 
away from porting ZTK to Python 3 and I would like to start working on a new 
release.

Regards,
Stephan
-- 
Entrepreneur and Software Geek
Google me. Zope Stephan Richter
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19

2013-02-26 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 02:41:02 PM Marius Gedminas wrote:
 This error is caused by zope.publisher 4.0.0a1:
 
   bin/buildout -n buildout:prefer-final=false buildout:versions=versions \
versions:zope.publisher='4.0.0a1' \
versions:zope.session='4.0.0a1'  bin/test -pvc
 
 makes the test pass, while
 
   bin/buildout -n buildout:prefer-final=false buildout:versions=versions \
versions:zope.publisher='4.0.0a1' \
versions:zope.session='4.0.0a1'  bin/test -pvc

This brings up a bigger question:

Even though, most ported packages are fully Python 3 compatible, they might 
depend on packages that are not ready to get a final release. Those two are:

* zope.security 4.0.0 (pending PyPy support from Tres)
* ZODB 4.0.0 (I am currently using an sdist of the py3 branch.)

Any package that depends directly or indirectly on those two packages has an 
alpha release right now. Strictly speaking this is not necessary for any 
package not depending on ZODB (ZODB is special because the dep changes from 
ZODB3 to ZODB).

If it is okay with everyone, we could change the releases to their final 
version numbers with the understanding that Python 3 support will not be 
available until all dependencies have their final release. Python 2 should work 
just fine once we get the trunk builds back to green.

Regards,
Stephan
-- 
Entrepreneur and Software Geek
Google me. Zope Stephan Richter
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0 process

2013-02-26 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi.

The process for a ZTK 2.0 release isn't really well defined. I'm not
sure if Jan-Wijbrand and Christophe are still interested in working on
ZTK releases.

Contrary to wait I said before I'd be willing to work on a ZTK 2.0
release (knowing the tools and procedure).

My goals for a 2.0 release would be (comparing to
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/releases/overview-1.1.html):

- Drop support for Python 2.5 (ZTK 1.1 still supports that)
- Add support for Python 3.x (either 3.3 or 3.2 and 3.3)
- Drop all zope.app packages from the KGS (most were deprecated in ZTK 1.1)
- Update to buildout 2
- Update to ZODB 4

Hanno

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Stephan Richter
stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi everyone,

 what is the process to start working on ZTK 2.0? We are about 5-6 packages
 away from porting ZTK to Python 3 and I would like to start working on a new
 release.

 Regards,
 Stephan
 --
 Entrepreneur and Software Geek
 Google me. Zope Stephan Richter
 ___
 Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
 **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
 (Related lists -
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0 process

2013-02-26 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 05:04:26 PM Hanno Schlichting wrote:
 Contrary to wait I said before I'd be willing to work on a ZTK 2.0
 release (knowing the tools and procedure).

Could you outline what the first step would be to create an alpha release list 
for 2.0? We could manually include an sdist of the ZODB 4 py3 branch to make 
the tests pass under Python 3.

Is anyone here willing to start a buildbot using Python 3.3 to test the ZTK?

 My goals for a 2.0 release would be (comparing to
 http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/releases/overview-1.1.html):

Great!

 - Drop support for Python 2.5 (ZTK 1.1 still supports that)

Yeah, none of the 4.0 packages do.

 - Add support for Python 3.x (either 3.3 or 3.2 and 3.3)

Since I was unwilling to change all u'...' to u('...'), most packages 
currently only have Python 3.3 support. By the time ZTK 2.0 will be released, 
I think most people will have switched to Python 3.3.

 - Drop all zope.app packages from the KGS (most were deprecated in ZTK 1.1)

Some of the zope.app packages (the ones not deprecated) should stay or simply 
be renamed to not being called zope.app.*.

 - Update to buildout 2

Yep, already done for all 4.0 packages.

 - Update to ZODB 4

This will be a requirement for Py3 support or is anyone willing to backport 
all the changes to ZODB3? :-)

We will also need to add a few packages, such as BTrees, persistent, 
transaction, etc. and deprecate/remove some others like zope.broken, 
zope.untrustedpython, zope.fixers, and zope.apidoc.

Regards,
Stephan
-- 
Entrepreneur and Software Geek
Google me. Zope Stephan Richter
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0 process

2013-02-26 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 02/26/2013 11:04 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
 My goals for a 2.0 release would be (comparing to 
 http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/releases/overview-1.1.html):
 
 - Drop support for Python 2.5 (ZTK 1.1 still supports that)

+1.

 - Add support for Python 3.x (either 3.3 or 3.2 and 3.3)

I would prefer 3.2 and 3.3.  The major hurdle for 3.2-compatibility is
unicode literals:  I volunteer to do the work if needed to fix that up
for the 3.3-ported packages.

 - Drop all zope.app packages from the KGS (most were deprecated in ZTK
 1.1)

+sys.maxint

 - Update to buildout 2 - Update to ZODB 4

+1 to both.



Tres.
- -- 
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlEs7IoACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ5zCACfbHYVhZES9b6BBnj/OKLytaNu
MToAnAyA//okvxRZdWrDL5XxgTBA7GSQ
=2JJu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19

2013-02-26 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:48:10AM -0500, Stephan Richter wrote:
 This brings up a bigger question:
 
 Even though, most ported packages are fully Python 3 compatible, they might 
 depend on packages that are not ready to get a final release. Those two are:
 
 * zope.security 4.0.0 (pending PyPy support from Tres)
 * ZODB 4.0.0 (I am currently using an sdist of the py3 branch.)
 
 Any package that depends directly or indirectly on those two packages has an 
 alpha release right now. Strictly speaking this is not necessary for any 
 package not depending on ZODB (ZODB is special because the dep changes from 
 ZODB3 to ZODB).
 
 If it is okay with everyone, we could change the releases to their final 
 version numbers with the understanding that Python 3 support will not be 
 available until all dependencies have their final release. Python 2 should 
 work 
 just fine once we get the trunk builds back to green.

I'm not a fan of non-alpha versions of packages depending on alpha
versions of other packages, so -0.5.

Marius Gedminas
-- 
http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19

2013-02-26 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 02/26/2013 10:46 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
 Even though, most ported packages are fully Python 3 compatible, they
 might depend on packages that are not ready to get a final release.
 Those two are:
 
 * zope.security 4.0.0 (pending PyPy support from Tres)

To be clear:  what is missing is the pure-Python reference implementation
of the spacesuit proxies:  without having that in place, passing the same
tests as the C version, and at 100% statement coverage, I'm not convinced
the Py3k port is correct (even though the C version passes all its
existing tests under Py3k).  Essentially, I rushed the Py3k port in order
not to block others working on porting dependents.

I have relevant experience in the zope.proxy port that doing the
reference implementation actually uncovers bugs in the C implementation.


 * ZODB 4.0.0 (I am currently using an sdist of the py3 branch.)


AFAIK, the remaining test failures on Py33 are largely spurious (doctest
repr issues, or else are pending the fork to use 'zodbpickle'.


 Any package that depends directly or indirectly on those two packages
 has an alpha release right now. Strictly speaking this is not
 necessary for any package not depending on ZODB (ZODB is special
 because the dep changes from ZODB3 to ZODB).

Packages which are still bleeding-edge themselves should be OK with
pinning non-final releases of their dependencies.



Tres.
- -- 
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlEs+EcACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ5AigCeLY5NgANp+RLFYyzpFUZa0hBM
v58AoIy2utc2SMHK2ibjIgMvW5aW5CmP
=9em0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0 process

2013-02-26 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Stephan Richter
stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote:
 Could you outline what the first step would be to create an alpha release list
 for 2.0? We could manually include an sdist of the ZODB 4 py3 branch to make
 the tests pass under Python 3.

I'll have to look at the procedure again a bit. Will do so in the next
days and start updating svn.zope.org/repos/main/zopetoolkit/trunk

 - Drop all zope.app packages from the KGS (most were deprecated in ZTK 1.1)

 Some of the zope.app packages (the ones not deprecated) should stay or simply
 be renamed to not being called zope.app.*.

Our rule for inclusion in the ZTK is: Whatever library is used by at
least two out of the three frameworks (BlueBream, Grok, Zope).

Given that BlueBream hasn't seen any release beyond a 1.0 about two
years back, I'm not sure it's active or relevant anymore. Grok isn't
seeing frequent releases, but there was a 1.5.5 mid last year.

If you compare the version list from the last ZTK 1.1.5
(http://download.zope.org/zopetoolkit/index/1.1.5/zopeapp-versions.cfg)
and Grok 1.5.5 (http://grok.zope.org/releaseinfo/1.5.5/versions.cfg),
you'll notice that Grok already overwrites the version requirement for
half of the non-deprecated packages with its own versions. And as I
said, Zope isn't using any of them anymore for a long time.

So I don't see any value in testing and promising stability for those
zope.app packages, when there aren't any shared consumers for the
specific versions.

And the actually used versions by Grok are:
zope.app.applicationcontrol, zope.app.appsetup, zope.app.debug -
renaming those to a non zope.app prefix doesn't make a lot of sense
for me either - as they are all about a specific app server
configuration and not generally reusable libraries.

Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 19

2013-02-26 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 01:00:39 PM Tres Seaver wrote:
  * ZODB 4.0.0 (I am currently using an sdist of the py3 branch.)
 
 AFAIK, the remaining test failures on Py33 are largely spurious (doctest
 repr issues, or else are pending the fork to use 'zodbpickle'.

So the state here is:

- We need to include zodbpickle in order to make pickle loading backward-
compatible with Python 2. Without this you cannot take you Python 2 ZODB and 
open it in Python 3. (zodbpickle's docs provide details.)

- Make noload() work in zodbpickle. I ported the code from cPickle, but it 
does not work. This prohibits GC without the ability to load the objects. 
noload() also needs a Python implementation and tests. I only know that 
noload() is not working because of a failure in the ZODB tests.

- Python 2 and 3 pickles have different sizes due to some added padding and 
some other reasons Marius has reported. Using zodbpickle will not fix that, 
since it is a fork of _pickle.c from Python 3.3. We simply should fix the tests 
to live with that fact.

That's pretty much it.

Regards,
Stephan
-- 
Entrepreneur and Software Geek
Google me. Zope Stephan Richter
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 1

2013-02-26 Thread Zope tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the 
zope-tests list between 2013-02-25 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-02-26 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our 
buildbot documentation: 
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received


[1]FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk Python-2.7.3 : Linux
[2]Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 185
[3]Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk_app - Build # 167
   Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.8 : Linux
   Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.8 : Linux
   Zope-2.13 Python-2.7.3 : Linux
   Zope-trunk Python-2.6.8 : Linux
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
[4]winbot / z3c.authenticator_py_265_32
[5]winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
[6]winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
[7]winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
[8]winbot / z3c.formui_py_265_32
[9]winbot / z3c.jsonrpc_py_265_32
[10]   winbot / z3c.jsontree_py_265_32
[11]   winbot / zc.resourcelibrary_py_265_32
[12]   winbot / zope.app.authentication_py_265_32
[13]   winbot / zope.app.authentication_py_265_32
[14]   winbot / zope.app.pagetemplate_py_265_32
[15]   winbot / zope.app.wsgi_py_265_32
[16]   winbot / zope.browserpage_py_265_32
[17]   winbot / zope.generations_py_265_32
[18]   winbot / zope.ptresource_py_265_32
[19]   winbot / zope.ptresource_py_265_32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64
[20]   winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32
[21]   winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64
   winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32
[22]   winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64

Non-OK results
--

[1]UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk Python-2.7.3 : Linux
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072853.html


[2]FAILED  Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 185
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072845.html


[3]FAILED  Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk_app - Build # 167
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072846.html


[4]FAILED  winbot / z3c.authenticator_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072868.html


[5]FAILED  winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072866.html


[6]FAILED  winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072872.html


[7]FAILED  winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072839.html


[8]FAILED  winbot / z3c.formui_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072843.html


[9]FAILED  winbot / z3c.jsonrpc_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072838.html


[10]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.jsontree_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072840.html


[11]   FAILED  winbot / zc.resourcelibrary_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072870.html


[12]   FAILED  winbot / zope.app.authentication_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072871.html


[13]   FAILED  winbot / zope.app.authentication_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072837.html


[14]   FAILED  winbot / zope.app.pagetemplate_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072841.html


[15]   FAILED  winbot / zope.app.wsgi_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072867.html


[16]   FAILED  winbot / zope.browserpage_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072869.html


[17]   FAILED  winbot / zope.generations_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072844.html


[18]   FAILED  winbot / zope.ptresource_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072873.html


[19]   FAILED  winbot / zope.ptresource_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072842.html


[20]   FAILED  winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072857.html


[21]   FAILED  winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072859.html


[22]   FAILED  winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072861.html


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 1

2013-02-26 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:00:01AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
 [1]FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk Python-2.7.3 : Linux

Failure in test test_combined_scored_search_planned 
(Products.ZCatalog.tests.test_catalog.TestScoring)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
/home/stefan/autotest/temp/python27-zope214all/eggs/Products.ZCatalog-3.0-py2.7.egg/Products/ZCatalog/tests/test_catalog.py,
 line 1099, in test_combined_scored_search_planned
self.assertEqual(brains[0].title, '111')
AssertionError: '11' != '111'

 [2]Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 185

Build #186 has failures in
- test-ztk-zope.traversing
- test-ztk-zope.dublincore
- test-ztk-zope.container
- test-ztk-zope.component
- test-ztk-zope.catalog
- test-ztk-zope.ramcache

All of them are variations of

  ImportError: No module named persistent

which is sort of surprising, given

  Getting required 'persistent'
required by ZODB 4.0.0dev.
  We have a develop egg: persistent 4.0.7dev

 [3]Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk_app - Build # 167

Build #168:

  /tmp/hudson2996479762744665535.sh: 1: ./bin/test-zopeapp: not found

and I just noticed, early on there's

  + ./bin/develop up -f
  /tmp/hudson2610355406837563482.sh: 1: ./bin/develop: not found

 [4]winbot / z3c.authenticator_py_265_32

Same Unicode prefix thing.

 [5]winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32

Moved to github.

 [6]winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
 [7]winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
 [8]winbot / z3c.formui_py_265_32

Same: failure to build lxml.

 [9]winbot / z3c.jsonrpc_py_265_32

svn step failed with
exceptions.WindowsError: [Error 32] The process cannot access the file because 
it is being used by another process: 'c:\\buildslave\\z3c.jsonrpc\\build'

 [10]   winbot / z3c.jsontree_py_265_32

Last build is successful!

 [11]   winbot / zc.resourcelibrary_py_265_32

buildout step failed with
WindowsError: [Error 32] The process cannot access the file because it is being 
used by another process: 'c:\\temp\\buildout-eex7yk'

 [12]   winbot / zope.app.authentication_py_265_32
 [13]   winbot / zope.app.authentication_py_265_32

Moved to github

 [14]   winbot / zope.app.pagetemplate_py_265_32

Same \r\n differences.

 [15]   winbot / zope.app.wsgi_py_265_32

Same PEP- violation.

 [16]   winbot / zope.browserpage_py_265_32

Same \r\n differences.

 [17]   winbot / zope.generations_py_265_32
 [18]   winbot / zope.ptresource_py_265_32
 [19]   winbot / zope.ptresource_py_265_32

Moved to github.

 [20]   winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32
 [21]   winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64
 [22]   winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64

Error: Couldn't install: coverage 3.5.3
(winbot compiler troubles that I'm not qualified to debug)

Marius Gedminas
-- 
http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 1

2013-02-26 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 08:55:21AM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
  [3]Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk_app - Build # 167
 
 Build #168:
 
   /tmp/hudson2996479762744665535.sh: 1: ./bin/test-zopeapp: not found

Given http://zope3.pov.lt/trac/changeset/129871/zopetoolkit (aka remove
all traces of zopeapp including test-zopeapp) this job should be disabled.

  [5]winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
  [12]   winbot / zope.app.authentication_py_265_32
  [13]   winbot / zope.app.authentication_py_265_32
  [18]   winbot / zope.ptresource_py_265_32
  [19]   winbot / zope.ptresource_py_265_32
 
 Moved to github.

These are already corrected in SVN.

Marius Gedminas
-- 
http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 1

2013-02-26 Thread Stephan Richter
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 08:55:21 AM Marius Gedminas wrote:
  [6]winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
  [7]winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
  [8]winbot / z3c.formui_py_265_32
 
 Same: failure to build lxml.

z3c.form used to pin lxml 2.3, which I did not even see on PyPI anymore. 
Unfortuantely the bot building Windows binaries is not running anymore. 

Regards,
Stephan
-- 
Entrepreneur and Software Geek
Google me. Zope Stephan Richter
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )