Re: [313] Electroclash rant/discussion ?s

2002-04-05 Thread robin pinning
If I'm not mistaken, the whole environment that Techno sprang from was elitist Social Clubs run by teens unusually interested in high fashion, naming parties after Clothing stores, fer chrissakes. (Sharivari, anyone?) What's happening in New York is not all that different; folks are just not

Re: [313] Electroclash rant/discussion ?s

2002-04-05 Thread J. T.
If I'm not mistaken, the whole environment that Techno sprang from was elitist Social Clubs run by teens unusually interested in high fashion, naming parties after Clothing stores, fer chrissakes. (Sharivari, anyone?) What's happening in New York is not all that different; folks i think you

Re: [313] Electroclash rant/discussion ?s

2002-04-05 Thread J. T.
If I'm not mistaken, the whole environment that Techno sprang from was elitist Social Clubs run by teens unusually interested in high fashion, naming parties after Clothing stores, fer chrissakes. (Sharivari, anyone?) What's happening in New York is not all that different; folks yeah

[313] Electroclash rant/discussion ?s

2002-04-04 Thread diana potts
This entire 'electroclash' revival seems like an older person's version of being a raver. Though the electroclash style doesn't require the baggy pants and glowsticks, the electro version does require a wardrobe, haircut and certain attitude. It doesn't surprise me that this is booming in NYC. A

Re: [313] Electroclash rant/discussion ?s

2002-04-04 Thread Ian
on 4/3/02 9:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It doesn't surprise me that this is booming in NYC. A city that is a revolving door for fads,fashions and anything seeming European. Or perhaps I'm just taking it all too seriously. No, you're taking it like Detroiter. Despite the underground

Re: [313] Electroclash rant/discussion ?s

2002-04-04 Thread Elliot Taub
If I'm not mistaken, the whole environment that Techno sprang from was elitist Social Clubs run by teens unusually interested in high fashion, naming parties after Clothing stores, fer chrissakes. (Sharivari, anyone?) What's happening in New York is not all that different; folks are just not in

Re: [313] Electroclash rant/discussion ?s

2002-04-04 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
Sue me for not liking mohawks or a good line o coke. I think it has a lot to do with the resurgence of cocain as the drug of choice. Without ever have gone to an Electroclash event - it calls to my mind things I've heard/read/seen on Studio 54. All glam - except the music has a bigger part but

Re: [313] Electroclash rant/discussion ?s

2002-04-04 Thread J. T.
too). Anyway, it's still not electro - unless you've got some breakin' crews there dueling it out ;) as far as i can figure it electroclash = nyc art/fashion/social scene electro = the music (regardless of who shows up/scene) except sometimes the music is little more than the scene itself, ala

[313] Electroclash rant/discussion ?s

2002-04-04 Thread samjacob
Diana, you asked why does a look have to be tied in with this movement... Fashion has been intimately tied to almost every subculture in this century, from Rude Boys to Mods to New Romantics to Old School Hip Hop. It is a way of differentiating the us from the them. Books like Dick Hebdige's