https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #199 from Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) ---
cc suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com, who works on the amd iommu driver.
Maybe he can provide some help for this issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
bakarichar...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|4.15 (4.16,4.17)|5.1.16,5.2rcx(4.x)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
bakarichar...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|VERIFIED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #197 from logxx (vladimir220...@mail.ru) ---
repeating myself, cuz launchpad sync lags:
well, i haven't used any other options, it works with kernel 5.1.14, dmesg
still complains about missing entries and iommu perf writing
--
You
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #196 from Erik (erikjohans...@flashbox.5july.org) ---
@(In reply to logxx from comment #195)
> my a315-41 works fine with arch linux when i append parameters with
> acpi_osi="Linux"
Do you use any other options or overrides?
cat
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
logxx (vladimir220...@mail.ru) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vladimir220...@mail.ru
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
Adam Lewis (adam.creativeas...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #193 from bakarichar...@gmail.com ---
These don't work for me. I don't think ivrs_ioapic causes performance loss. Why
it should? Show me a dmesg!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
kgs (kgs.v...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kgs.v...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #191 from bakarichar...@gmail.com ---
Dear kernel developers,
the ACPI seems to be OK from kernel v 5.1 but only with using the ivrs_ioapic
kernel parameters. This is almos a constant failure by these notebooks.
Couldn't this be
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #190 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
The problem with suspend/hibernation was with usb3 port not secure boot, just
disable wake from usb devices at xchi0 and xchi1 controllers.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #189 from Erik (erikjohans...@flashbox.5july.org) ---
I got the non G model (no dedicated GPU) A315-41.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #188 from Erik (erikjohans...@flashbox.5july.org) ---
Yes i got bios 1.13.
The bug with being forced to add my grub as trusted file was in earlier bios
and i don't know if it's still in the latest bios as i haven't tried it out.
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #187 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
Have you updated bios to 1.13?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
acpi-bugzilla
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #186 from Erik (erikjohans...@flashbox.5july.org) ---
I have IOMMU and SVM enabled in bios/UEFI.
I toggled Secure boot setting and it doesn't change anything, hibernation works
anyway and i still need ivrs to boot.
I tried with secure
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #185 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
(In reply to Erik from comment #184)
> @Vladislav Kamenev i still need ivrs to boot 5.1-rc5 kernel.
> Since there was talks about problems with hibernation i even setup a swap
>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #184 from Erik (erikjohans...@flashbox.5july.org) ---
@Vladislav Kamenev i still need ivrs to boot 5.1-rc5 kernel.
Since there was talks about problems with hibernation i even setup a swap file
and tested hibernation (Suspend to Disk
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #183 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
i can boot latest 5.0 with no parameters in manjaro, i bet i can boot 5.1 just
as well,i am not willing to download and try an in-development kernel right
now.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #182 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
I don't need to map ivrs to boot 5.1 successfully 100% times. Seems like you
need to have secure boot disabled (i did it like last summer) and iommu ENABLED
(my laptop comes with
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #181 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
you see you shouldnt panick right away, secure boot also causes
suspend\hibernation issues for me so if you have further problems disable that
too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #180 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
Turns out my iommu was disabled in bios. I turned it on and ivrs mapping fixes
all the issues for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #179 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
you need to get and see an iommu dump, but i dont think that's the issue just
disable secure boot and your fine
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #178 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
Could there be that my ivrs_table values differs from others? How to check that
00:14.0 and 00:00.2 are good for me?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #177 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
remap the tables and disable secure boot and suspend\hibernate will work on any
linux
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #176 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
When i remap ivrs then my sleep\hibernation doesn't work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #175 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
also why do you not remap the ivrs tables? there is no drawback in doing so.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #174 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
[petrovich@aspire-a315-41g ~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep MHz
cpu MHz : 2994.548
cpu MHz : 2994.549
cpu MHz : 2994.347
cpu MHz : 2994.346
cpu MHz
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #173 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
try running mprime to check cpu frequency scaling,mine could run at 3.6ghz and
after i disable turbo boost runs max at 2.5ghz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #172 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
So, manjaro 5.0.7 boot with this cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.0-x86_64
root=UUID=7185a279-f7e5-4189-b218-39f49eedce8a rw quiet loglevel=3 vga=current
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #170 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
Manjaro 5.0.2 kernel here. As i reported before most of my bootings w\o any
kernel parameters are fine, but today i found out that my 2500u won't boost any
further 2.0ghz. Idk
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #171 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
tl;dr even if it would be possible to boot without any tricks in kernel
arguments some features of cpu would still be borken
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
federico (seekhe...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seekhe...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #168 from Michael T (jitecad...@mailing.one) ---
Eric I compare optimized Windows 10 with the bare minimum options and
configured for energy saving rather than performance. Since I'm not good at
linux I can't do the same there to have
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
Michael T (jitecad...@mailing.one) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
kgs (kgs.v...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|kgs.v...@gmail.com |
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #166 from bakarichar...@gmail.com ---
Erik, try what I wrote: powersave option + powertop settings enabled.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #165 from bakarichar...@gmail.com ---
Erik, try that what I wrote. Powersave mode + powerop (enable all powersave
settings)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #164 from Erik (erikjohans...@flashbox.5july.org) ---
I just tested battery time in windows, with full brightness as i had in
previous tests and i was able to get about 15 extra minutes from windows 10, my
guess is that's because
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #163 from Kai-Heng Feng (kai.heng.f...@canonical.com) ---
The latest i2c-amd-mp2 driver will be included in next Ubuntu Bionic, Cosmic
and Disco kernel release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #162 from bakarichar...@gmail.com ---
For better battery time in linux set the cpufreq governor to "powersave" and
check powertop options.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #161 from Michael T (pofav...@maillink.top) ---
If you check the manufacturer specifications, at least for my model it says
"Maximum Battery Run Time 6 Hour" ofc this is not realistic, but 5h is. I'm not
saying that different OS's
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #160 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
I dont know what you people are talking about 5hrs of battery life on windows,
but on all my budget laptops that run linux i get a max of 3hrs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
Michael T (pofav...@maillink.top) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pofav...@maillink.top
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #158 from Erik (erikjohans...@flashbox.5july.org) ---
Maybe it worked with kernel 4.19 with your distribution but touchpad didn't
work for me since i only use vanilla kernels without patches.
Ubuntu patches i2c-amd-mp2 support, in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
Michael T (menule...@mailing.one) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||menule...@mailing.one
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #156 from Erik (erikjohans...@flashbox.5july.org) ---
As i wrote i still use parameters.
ivrs_ioapic[4]=00:14.0 ivrs_ioapic[5]=00:00.2
For me i couldn't boot with anything other then pci=noacpi before, but now ivrs
parameters work and
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
kgs (kgs.v...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kgs.v...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #154 from Erik (erikjohans...@flashbox.5july.org) ---
I forgot to add that some distributions may include i2c-amd-mp2 built in to the
kernel and that may be an older non working version.
If that's the case then you need to rebuild the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #153 from Erik (erikjohans...@flashbox.5july.org) ---
With bios/UEFI 1.13 and kernel 5.0.7 things seems to work.
I got touchpad working by installing https://github.com/Syniurge/i2c-amd-mp2
(master works, the wip-v16 doesn't work and
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #152 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Anyways i am curious, do these laptops work with freesync?anyone tried it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #151 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Yea, well said, i spent 400 euros for this acer laptop and it came with linux
pre-installed(as an average consumer i thought that this meant linux is
supported out of the box), at least they
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #150 from bakarichar...@gmail.com ---
That is not clear if their bios should meet the standards or not. It's also not
clear if we should accept that they support Win10 only. I don't really know.
Maybe this is something which is
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #149 from Kung Lao (su...@easymail.top) ---
Siya market share defines the percentage of workers that get assigned to each
problem. So even though Richard is correct that fewer people use Linux on their
Acer laptop it still is
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #148 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Market share cannot be an excuse in this case, i've read myriad reviews about
lenovo-hp-asus laptops that either worked out of the box with linux, or had a
quick bios fix that resolved the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #147 from bakarichar...@gmail.com ---
Kung Lao, the market share of Linux desktop is very low so supporting it hasn't
got high priority, unfortunately. However the manufacturers should be more
flexible because of the future
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #146 from Kung Lao (su...@easymail.top) ---
Thanks for the informative paste Richard, sorry for my frustration but for most
of us the waranty of the laptop is almost expired and the issue still exists.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #145 from bakarichar...@gmail.com ---
Hi Adam,
Thanks for your answer. We are waiting the patches.
Best Regards
Richard
Yang, Adam <*>
2019. 04. 05., P, 17:04
Hi all,
We're still currently verifying the patches (not one patch but a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
Kung Lao (su...@easymail.top) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su...@easymail.top
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #143 from bakarichar...@gmail.com ---
No, he hasn't changed the status. This is the status change:
Aroiu Ovidiu (ixanneo) on 2018-11-20
Changed in amd:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #142 from bakarichar...@gmail.com ---
He has changed the bug status to "Fix Released" on Ubuntu's Launchpad.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #141 from bakarichar...@gmail.com ---
There is a fix for this whole thing I think, he just made an answer to the
latest comment:
In Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #200087, eutychios23
(eutychios23-linux-kernel-bugs) wrote 2 hours ago:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #140 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
I checked it and i got comfused,does he mean that there is a fix for the ioapic
issue, or for Vladislav's issue?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #139 from bakarichar...@gmail.com ---
Hi people,
check this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1776563/comments/415
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #138 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Strange i can boot with 5.0.5 on my acer laptop.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #137 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
Even with my tricks i cannot boot into 5.0.5 Manjaro kernel. Downgrading to
5.0.2 make my laptop booting without issues
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #136 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
maybe you have a "unique" mouse?try a different usb mouse and reboot
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #135 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
Or i'm very lucky and this is coincedence or yes, when my mice is connected
(doesn't have other usb devices at the moment) to usb 2.0 that is nearest to
power plug my boot is
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #134 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
only that port works and you dont lockup?second usb2 port?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #133 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
You won't believe me. When i have mouse usb plugged in usb 2.0 that near power
plug - my boot is OK. When it is not - hard lockup on boot
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #132 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
i am using manjaro linux with 5.0.3 and latest updates all runs well here,have
you tried disabling secure boot?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #131 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
LoL downgraded kernel back to 5.0.2, which i considered OK and still i cannot
boot into system without special arguments, like i did before when 5.0.2 was
latest in repos. Seems
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #130 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
Updated kernel from 5.0.2 to 5.0.4 and now i'm getting hardlocks on boot. On
5.0.2 i could boot without any special kernel arguments
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
Ziniral (zinu...@outlook.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|zinu...@outlook.de |
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #129 from bakarichar...@gmail.com ---
Both way worth a try. You could be right about Linpus, we should figure out
where is the team which patched linpus kernel for these notebooks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #128 from Darksurf (piroisl...@gmail.com) ---
What blows my mind is they used Linpus Linux (fedora spin) for specific
laptops that come default on the laptop. They surely already have a team, I
don't they write their own BIOS which
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #126 from Darksurf (piroisl...@gmail.com) ---
Yep still get hard lock if I don't add both missing IVRS table data for
0:00.2 and 0:14.0 . But, I no longer require i8042.nopnp to get touchpad
working, but it does complain about an AUX
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #125 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
your fan runs at 100% because you use pci=noacpi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #124 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Ness are you using secure boot?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
Ness (nessnes...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nessnes...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #122 from Darksurf (piroisl...@gmail.com) ---
I'll compile a 5 series kernel and get back sometime this week week.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 10:49 wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
>
> --- Comment #121 from
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #121 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
I think we should wait till more people try 1.13 bios with 5.0 kernel and
confirm that laptop is now usable
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #120 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
So can we close this bug report now or not?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
acpi-bugzilla
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #119 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
to revive touchpad after 1.13 do:
sudo modprobe -r i2c_hid
sudo modprobe i2c_hid
as for the wireless problem i ve opened a back report here:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #118 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
Manjaro 5.0.2 kernel can start without exotics with 1.13 bios. Wi-Fi
firmware(ath10k), however, dies right after getting into DE. Interestingly -
vulkan bugs with Vega 8 went
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #117 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
After update to 1.13 my touchpad doesn't work in Linux. Not recommending
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #116 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
Soft lockups now occurs even with ivrs_table arguments in place.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #115 from Vladislav Kamenev (mazahakafore...@ya.ru) ---
A315-41-RX8R here. With 1.13 still cannot boot into manjaro default 4.20 kernel
without ivrs_table\noapic tricks. CPU soft lockup
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #114 from bakarichar...@gmail.com ---
siyia, I don't think they created it. Firmwares are often manufactured by third
party companies however it would be nice to see a studious community work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #113 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
I think acer should join the Linux Foundation or sth, this is embarassing, they
cant even create proper iASL compliant bios.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #112 from Darksurf (piroisl...@gmail.com) ---
So it looks like my changes in 1.12 got merged into everyone's 1.13? it's
an obvious attempt at some form of Linux support. BIOS tweaks don't have to
be exciting or glorious to show
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #111 from Erik (erikjohans...@flashbox.5july.org) ---
@Darksurf i looked at that laptop model and there was an 1.12 bios for it but
the changes wasn't that exciting.
Bios 1.12
"1.Add SCCM solution.
2.Change touch pad mode from basic
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #110 from Darksurf (piroisl...@gmail.com) ---
That update was for the AN515-42 Acer Nitro5. They're are legitimately
making an attempt, so color me impressed.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019, 08:17 wrote:
>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #109 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
there is no bios update 1.12 where did you get this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #108 from Darksurf (piroisl...@gmail.com) ---
They called out in BIOS update 1.12 that it was an attempt at fixing "Linux
SKU".
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019, 06:10 wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
>
> --- Comment
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #107 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 281883
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=281883=edit
Manjaro kernel config in use with bios 1.13
this is the standard running kernel config of manjaro
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
Erik (erikjohans...@flashbox.5july.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #105 from Another User (to_l...@i.ua) ---
Whoa, looks like ACER really trying fix this! Sadly, current solution is not
working for all.
And touchpad behaviors somewhat strange. It forced to advanced mode in 1.03
bios too, but does not
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #104 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
anyways if acer uploads a new bios, i wont update again, i think it was pure
luck they fixed it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200087
--- Comment #103 from siyia (eutychio...@gmail.com) ---
touchpad gets stuck sometimes during boot or after hibernation, but it is easy
to
fix with a script containing:
modprobe -r i2c_hid
modprobe i2c_hid
--
You are receiving this mail
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
