PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
How's that better than having a live, writeable version handy?
The limitations of a RODC seem to be unwieldy and otherwise clumsy on it's
own.
In most every branch DC I have seen, there was no serious need
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 9:07 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
:o)
Don't even need to worry about multiple ports. It is all hierarchical. I
can
of the legacy intact?
Huh?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:19 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
Expand?
Even better in my opinion would
Maybe you should read about eDIR/NDS... :) Novell did this back in '93.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Sent: 06 October 2005 01:51
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
I'd
is though.
-ajm
CCBW
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:52:25 +0100
Maybe you should read about eDIR/NDS... :) Novell did this back in '93.
-Original Message
].
neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: 10 October 2005 15:10
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
While I generally agree this would be great, I have to ask about eDir
and
it's
] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 7:10 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
I'm curious, Charlie and Neil. What services do these SMB's
offer that they
need multiple instances of DC's? I realize that a best
practice
] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 7:10 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
I'm curious, Charlie and Neil. What services do these SMB's
offer that they
need multiple instances of DC's? I realize that a best
practice is to have
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 10:28 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
I agree. SMB business can be very complex.
Can you expand on the idea that VM's
as well...
Aric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Kaiser
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 12:42 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
The limitations of the VMs are the underlying hardware
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
The limitations of the VMs are the underlying hardware, in our case. I have
9 VMs running on one server. It's choking for more RAM, but management won't
foot the bill for the additional riser card and ram. Otherwise
: Monday, October 10, 2005 4:03 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
Sounds like we need an LDAP.SYS that is similar to HTTP.SYS in that it can
act as a routing, queuing, and parsing mechanism to determine which LDAP
namespace/partition or domain
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 2:09 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
I don't think the issue is there. When you make an LDAP call, you
specify
where you want to go, the hierarchy is all
running ADAM using ADAM for the backend
principal store?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard, Aric
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 6:59 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
Agreed
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active
Directory wish list
Im not saying we need a better solution here, and there are factors due to the
internal/external nature of our business that PSS (I think) recommended the
design we have. When we
built it, the empty root
Do it all the time, never had a problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:52 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
You have never used TS Manager
] Active Directory wish list
Do it all the time, never had a problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:52 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
You have
joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DeStefano,
DanSent: Friday, October 07, 2005 8:46 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory
wish list
I would like a better
way of making bulk changes to AD. There seems to be caveats
Of
joeSent: Friday, October 07, 2005 9:07 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory
wish list
It is suprisingno one has responded to this with the
"pat" answer... this is describing MIIS and the workflowpiece they
havebuilt into it and theidea being that AD
!)
Rich
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005
11:07 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active
Directory wish list
It is suprisingno one has responded
to this with the pat answer... this is describing MIIS
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent: Friday, October 07, 2005 9:07 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory
wish list
It is suprisingno one has responded to this with the
"pat" answer... this is describing MIIS and the wor
10/7/2005 12:18 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
when you say,you need to understand more than os config twidlling, what
does that mean?
what would you call just knowing ..os config twiddling in a AD admin
context?
Do you mean deeper knowldge
: Wed 05/10/2005 22:47
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
Not being an OS architect, I'm not sure how MS would make it work
(obviously it's not easy) but I would think something along the lines of
different IP addresses per domain and using DNS
not do, in order that I may learn how to do
it. - Pablo Picasso
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 7:20 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
, October 06, 2005 9:35 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
There seem to be several schools of thought on the password policy issue...
- the execs and exec admins who should have the 4th most complex passwords
(next to HR, accounting, and IT maybe
: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
There seem to be several schools of thought on the password policy issue...
- the execs and exec admins who should have the 4th most complex passwords
(next to HR, accounting, and IT maybe) but lack the computer literacy to
understand why and so
: [ActiveDir] Active
Directory wish list
I don'tmakerecommendations
based onvaporware or rumors...
Ed
Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard, Aric
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
Then we should be looking at user authentication by other means than just
passwords. But that isn't a utopia either.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn
Sent: 06
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
I have not been in many biometric/smart card discussions, but the ones I have
been in have never addressed one particular issue:
Ok, so logons are now secured very nicely. So how secure is the
background mechanism
; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
As I say, it isn't utopia.
And what about fallback positions?
* You use fingerprint technology and that hand is encased in plaster and hence
can't work with your fingerprint scanner. Now what?
* You use smart
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 8:55 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory
wish list
You're hardly alone in this. It took a little while
before the touted security of the empty root model was blown open
I can't sniff, my nose is plugged up. I ran out of Claritin-D.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 12:22 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
I
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
As I say, it isn't utopia.
And what about fallback positions?
* You use fingerprint technology and that hand is encased in plaster and
hence can't work with your fingerprint scanner. Now what?
* You use smart-cards and leave it at home one
of Claritin-D.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 12:22 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
I have not been in many biometric/smart card
, October 04, 2005 9:37 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
I'd also like to see the ability to run DCs for multiple domains on the
same server. SMBs with limited resources balk at having to buy
additional server hardware for redundancy on multiple
6:37 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
I'd also like to see the ability to run DCs for multiple domains on the same
server. SMBs with limited resources balk at having to buy additional server
hardware for redundancy on multiple domains
, October 04, 2005 9:20 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
Yeah I can say that it isn't in Longhorn. As the dev guys put it, this
is a
tough one. It wouldn't just be a nobrainer if they had separate
instances of
AD, there are just tons of other things
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 1:48 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
I think the biggest reason people want to be able to run multiple domains on
one server is the same reason practically no one
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 9:20 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
Yeah I can say that it isn't in Longhorn. As the dev guys put it, this
is a
tough one. It wouldn't just be a nobrainer
: Re: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
As a representative of the SBS community there is not a day that goes by
that the 'can we cluster SBS' or 'can I have a hot server' doesn't come
up. [if you have SA you can have a cold server]
With 9/11, with Katrina, with the potential
: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 1:12 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
As a representative of the SBS community there is not a day that goes by
that the 'can we cluster SBS' or 'can I have a hot server' doesn't come
up. [if you have SA you can
, at least multiple domains on one hardware box *sounds* cool.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Kaiser
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 6:37 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 1:12 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
As a representative of the SBS community there is not a day that goes
by
that the 'can we cluster SBS' or 'can I have a hot server' doesn't come
up. [if you have SA you can
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed
Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 10:07 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
You can. It's called Microsoft Virtual Server.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
, October 05, 2005 3:17 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
How would LDAP apps easily address multiple AD domains hosted on one
server? What if you wanted to make this box a GC for more than one
domain? How easily can
Of joe
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 9:20 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
Yeah I can say that it isn't in Longhorn. As the dev guys put it, this
is a
tough one. It wouldn't just be a nobrainer if they had separate
instances of
AD
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Kaiser
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 5:47 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
Not being an OS architect, I'm not sure how MS would make it work (obviously
it's not easy) but I would think
RenoufSent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 1:37 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Active Directory
wish list
My question would be: for a small directory of 5000 users, why do you have
3 domains? If it is for separate password policies, then perhaps a better wish
list item would
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
Not being an OS architect, I'm not sure how MS would make it work (obviously
it's not easy) but I would think something along the lines of different IP
addresses per domain and using DNS to resolve the domain
the world from PSTs and Bricked
Backups!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich
MilburnSent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 2:29 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory
wish list
Im not saying we need a better solution here
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active
Directory wish list
You're hardly alone in this. It took
a little while before the touted security of the empty root model was blown
open by my esteemed colleagues at HP (then Compaq). Lots and lots of
organizations have adopted empty-root and other multiple
:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory
wish list
Actually, it may
rumor has it that there may be some licensing changes coming for the virtualized
Windows world
Aric
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]Sent
a bit late to add major changes but your ideas could make it into a
later rev.
joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
WoodSent: Monday, October 03, 2005 3:46 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory
wish list
Hi,
Wi
PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
Hi,
With Windows Vista on it's way what's on people's wish list
as far as Active Directory is concerned? Also are there any
big enhancements due?
Thanks
Steven
List info : http
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list
I'd also like to see the ability to run DCs for multiple domains on the same
server. SMBs with limited resources balk at having to buy additional server
hardware for redundancy on multiple domains, especially when
Hi,
With Windows Vista on it's waywhat's on
people's wish list as far as Active Directory is concerned?Alsoare
there anybig enhancements due?
Thanks
Steven
56 matches
Mail list logo
