I am just speaking about how easy requirement about making assignments can be
passed.
23.04.2015, 17:19, Matyas Koszik kos...@atw.hu:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Opteamax GmbH wrote:
On 23.04.2015 15:39, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
If we suppose having multiple /22 per LIR is abusing then main
and A (for now) is 97. Thus totally allocated T2 = 97 * 128 /
4 = 6208 blocks from last /8.
Final digits are the same.
23.04.2015, 14:20, Vladimir Andreev vladi...@quick-soft.net:
Hi, All!
I decided to express my opinion regarding this proposal.
As appears from the proposal summary
policies.
23.04.2015, 16:49, Opteamax GmbH r...@opteamax.de:
On 23.04.2015 15:39, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
If we suppose having multiple /22 per LIR is abusing then main
abuser is RIPE NCC since RIPE NCC makes transfers and LIR merging
allowing to receive second /22 etc.
So you agree my
allocation or you didn't make assignments.
23.04.2015, 17:08, Jens Ott - Opteamax GmbH j...@opteamax.de:
On 23.04.2015 14:45, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
The LIR must confirm it will make assignment(s) from the
allocation.
Please point me where in quoted text you see any prohibition to
open
, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503
I can't remain indifferent to such interesting proposal :)
So I have to continue (no matter has it formal impact or not).
25.04.2015, 16:28, Gert Doering g...@space.net:
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:22:15PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
I think you mix preventing making profit and assure
Agree. 25.04.2015, 16:52, "Infinity Telecom SRL" i...@infinitytelecom.ro:Hello Gert, We can stop this discuss, yes. But not the RIPE NCC will be the winner here, Elvis and his guys (sellers) should start this proposal: - returned not used space. - put a tax on each IP, LIR with no used IP,
delight that other can't do their business) to some group of members
(possible little).
If such proposal HAS exact reasoning — OK, let'e discuss!
23.04.2015, 15:50, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
On application for IPv4 resources LIRs will receive
As variant:
1. I receive /22
2. I create 2 x inetnum with type ASSIGNED PA
3. I announced it for about 1 month
4. I sell it
Such way I fully correspond to 5.* statements.
23.04.2015, 15:54, Opteamax GmbH r...@opteamax.de:
On 23.04.2015 14:50, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
3.0 Goals of the Internet
I answered to this question in another thread.
I can announce my /22 for some time. And after that sell it
23.04.2015, 15:59, Opteamax GmbH r...@opteamax.de:
On 23.04.2015 14:45, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
The LIR must confirm it will make assignment(s) from the
allocation.
Please point me
OK. Let's it's welcome side effect.
Please answer me the following question:
What reasoning (not purpose) has current proposal?
23.04.2015, 15:57, Gert Doering g...@space.net:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:45:56PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
On application for IPv4 resources LIRs
97691059
Email: j...@opteamax.de
HRB: 23144, Amtsgericht Montabaur
Umsatzsteuer-ID.: DE264133989
--
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503
, 15:38, Gert Doering g...@space.net:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:22:34PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
But the proposal doesn't forbid to open many LIRs and then merge them
together.
Indeed, because that would prevent legitimate business processes.
But what it does is making the open
at 03:41:10PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
And why receiving /22's for own company is legitimate and for selling is
not?
*one* /22 per LIR is the last-/8 policy
not open lots of LIRs, so a single LIR can have multiple /22s in the end,
and circumvent the one-LIR-one-/22-allocated
3.0 Goals of the Internet Registry System
can be treated by a lot of ways.
I (personally) doesn't find any prohibition in st. 3.0 to have many /22 per LIR.
23.04.2015, 15:39, Opteamax GmbH r...@opteamax.de:
On 23.04.2015 14:31, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
openig a bunch of LIR only
abuse any policies.
If we suppose having multiple /22 per LIR is abusing then main abuser is RIPE
NCC since RIPE NCC makes transfers and LIR merging allowing to receive second
/22 etc.
23.04.2015, 16:35, Gert Doering g...@space.net:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:22:51PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev
that want to
sell their /22's.
23.04.2015, 16:12, Gert Doering g...@space.net:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:05:46PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
OK. Let's it's welcome side effect.
Please answer me the following question:
What reasoning (not purpose) has current proposal?
The RIPE
7808806
cont...@infinitytelecom.ro
--
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503
this as a viable business model..
Regards,
Erik Bais
--
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503
of a policy, and they shouldn't be
subject to possible changes of the system? The price for the /22's he's
getting only doubled, so I believe that's still OK. Bad Luck.
Regards, Garry
--
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503
You spoke that some russians make profit and don't speak about other nations.
Table of TOP transfers from your last letter shows it clearly.
09.06.2015, 19:33, Ciprian Nica off...@ip-broker.uk:
On 6/9/2015 7:19 PM, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
help the last /8 pool become even larger
to but obviously I appologize to all other russians. It's just your
company and mr. Bulgakov who have abused in my opinion of the last /8.
But only because of 2 rotten apples I would not throw them all away.
Ciprian
On 6/9/2015 7:43 PM, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
You spoke that some russians make
have
nothing to worry about right now. Yes?
09.06.2015, 18:58, Gert Doering g...@space.net:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 06:51:01PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
The reason for this policy is to make sure that the community keeps to
the *intent* of the last /8 policy: ensure
.: DE813185279
--
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503
One fix:
Not inetnum and route but inet6num and route6.
19.06.2015, 15:23, Vladimir Andreev vladi...@quick-soft.net:
Another way:
1) Create inetnum with type ALLOCATED-BY-LIR inside of inetnum allocated
by RIPE NCC to LIR;
2) Create route object with the same IP prefix as in step 1
on such a proposal?
Regards
Thomas Drewermann
Freifunk Rheinland e.V.
--
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503
inetnum.
19.06.2015, 15:15, Christopher Kunz chrisl...@de-punkt.de:
Am 19.06.15 um 14:06 schrieb Vladimir Andreev:
Hello!
Why wouldn't they become a LIR?
Small Hotspot providers and especially Freifunk communities typically
can not afford a LIR Membership to be independent. In my opinion
PERSONAL ATTACK! HELP! :):):) 11.06.2015, 14:31, "Jan Ingvoldstad" frett...@gmail.com:On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Vladimir Andreev vladi...@quick-soft.net wrote: As mentioned many times during debates AP WG has no relations to financial questions. In such case WHY does current pol
Hi! According to PDP it's possibly to change any proposal's state to "Discussion" or "Withdraw" after "Review" phase. 10.06.2015, 18:59, "Jan Ingvoldstad" frett...@gmail.com:On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:38 PM, r...@ntx.ru r...@ntx.ru wrote:Greetings again, Sorry that I joined this discussion with
regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503
Ha-ha.
Short version: you're in a hole, so stop digging.
As I see the circus must go on.
Just to laugh at...
01.07.2015, 13:09, Jim Reid j...@rfc1035.com:
On 1 Jul 2015, at 10:39, Vladimir Andreev vladi...@quick-soft.net wrote:
So do we have real consensus?
For this policy proposal, I
and/or cancels 2015-01.
--
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503
Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
--
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503
I mean detailed analysis of pros and cons.
For example, why wasn't it separately mentioned about MA as a BIG hole?
29.06.2015, 22:50, Gert Doering g...@space.net:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:47:19PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
Why not to write down and weigh all the arguments
(0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
--
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503
: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
--
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503
, through your own inaction.
It's best that those who see a problem, are the ones to attempt addressing
it.
--
Jan
--
Kind regards,
Petr Umelov
--
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503
37 matches
Mail list logo
