Re: new single DLT tape drive

2004-08-10 Thread Svetoslav Tolev
Hi, The command you need is: label libvolume library_name volume_name Regards, Svetoslav Luc Beaudoin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09.08.2004 20:13 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject new

HELP needed. Can't use rmt3 rmt4 for SAN backup.

2004-08-10 Thread Ameerul Mazli
Hi All, I have this scenario on the TSM server: -TSM Svr 5.2.3 -TSM Client 5.2.2 -TSM SAN 5.2.2 -Tape library 3584 LTO with 4 drives I have another clientA with SAN attached. It can see (lsdev -Cc) the 3rd and 4 th drive of the 3584. 1st and 2nd is by another clientB. For clientB, after

Re: HELP needed. Can't use rmt3 rmt4 for SAN backup.

2004-08-10 Thread Richard van Denzel
Ameerul, You should make sure that the drives maps are exact. E.g. when drive rmt1 on clientA maps to rmt3 on tsmsrv you should make sure that whne you define the tape path for clientA that you use the correct drive within TSM (that is the DRIVE for rmt3), the physical device is however /dev/rmt1

Re: FILE DEV CLASS

2004-08-10 Thread Svetoslav Tolev
I recomend you to use bigger size (by the sample 1000 MB) because the performance is sometimes better. The other reason is that if in volume is writen only 100 MB - then the file will be 100 MB The only problem is only when volume is full and usage is only 10 % - than the file will be 1GB but

Re: AIX5.3 and power5 for pSeries

2004-08-10 Thread Gianluca Mariani1
TSM 5.3 will support AIX 5.3. Cordiali saluti Gianluca Mariani Tivoli TSM Global Response Team, Roma Via Sciangai 53, Roma phones : +39(0)659664598 +393351270554 (mobile) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: HP OpenView Integration

2004-08-10 Thread goc
we are using HPOV for monitoring dmserv processes and few default ones ... nothing speciall but works excellent regs goran - Original Message - From: Steve Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 2:54 AM Subject: HP OpenView Integration HI all, Are

Re: DISK POOL

2004-08-10 Thread Dwight Cook
going to be something wrong with your next pool in one way or another 3494POOL, you should check the status of the library if AIX, lsdev -Cctape, look for lmcp#, use in mtlib -l/dev/lmcp# -qL look for anything like ~gripper not available~ or ~paused operational state~, etc... mtlib

TSM 5.2.3.1 SMUTIL Problem

2004-08-10 Thread Weichler, Stefan
Hello, last week we updated our 6 TSM-Sever at the mainframe (z/OS 1.4) to 5.2.3.1. Today we found following errors in our actlog: 2004-08-09 22:30 ANRD SMUTIL(12815): ThreadId10591 Session 5837 attempted to associate itself with the wrong node Callchain follows: pkShowCallChain+2E2 -

Re: AIX5.3 and power5 for pSeries

2004-08-10 Thread Bill Boyer
Any more information...like release dates? The new pServers with Power5 and AIX5.2 start shipping next month. We have one on order to replace our current B80 TSM server which goes off lease and support next month, too. Calling TSM support gets us nothing. Since AIX5.3 is not release, they won't

Re: AIX5.3 and power5 for pSeries

2004-08-10 Thread Remco Post
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 08:49:05 -0400 Bill Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any more information...like release dates? The new pServers with Power5 and AIX5.2 start shipping next month. We have one on order to replace our current B80 TSM server which goes off lease and support next month, too.

Re: AIX5.3 and power5 for pSeries

2004-08-10 Thread Gianluca Mariani1
Ok, let's turn it round Do you NEED AIX 5.3? TSM does not, we're not using symmetric multiprocessing just yet... you'll be happy as always with your new AIX 5.2 power5.happier, infact, as the I/Os will be a lot more. you won't catch me giving actual release dates other than our official

TSM Compatibility

2004-08-10 Thread Rob Hefty
Hello all, Does anyone know how the versioning between TSM and Aix is set up or if there is a Compatibility Matrix available anywhere. I can't seem to find anything on IBM's website. We are mainly concerned with TSM 5.1 through 5.2 and Aix 5.1 through 5.2 functioning together. Thanks, Rob

Re: TSM Compatibility

2004-08-10 Thread Richard Sims
Does anyone know how the versioning between TSM and Aix is set up or if there is a Compatibility Matrix available anywhere. I can't seem to find anything on IBM's website. We are mainly concerned with TSM 5.1 through 5.2 and Aix 5.1 through 5.2 functioning together. Click on Server Requirements

Re: AIX5.3 and power5 for pSeries

2004-08-10 Thread Bill Boyer
We will need AIX 5.3 to support LPAR capability of the box. We are an IBM business partner and a TotalStorage Solution Center. This is for our showcase, but also one of the LPAR's will replace the B80 server running TSM. Fibre attached to a 3584 library with LTO2 drives. From what my pServer-guy

Re: AIX5.3 and power5 for pSeries

2004-08-10 Thread David Longo
I think you need 5.3 for the fractional CPU LPAR. AIX 5.2 will run on these machines, with 5.2's dynamic LPAR capability, using a whole CPU granularity. David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:

Re: AIX5.3 and power5 for pSeries

2004-08-10 Thread Richard van Denzel
David, You're right. As far as I know a p5 system will run on AIX 5.2 with the (D)LPAR capabilities of AIX 5.2. Also the power5 CPU will behave as a power4 CPU with AIX 5.2 (that's what IBM told us). Richard. David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ANR2579E/ANR1512E with Return Code = 1

2004-08-10 Thread Hammer, Ronald A.
Hi listers, I've installed TSM DP for MS-Exchange V5.2.1.0 on a Windows 2003 MSCS cluster. My TSM server V5.2.2.5 runs under Windows 2003 native. But the client schedule for the DP backup fails with ANR2579E/ANR1512E with Return Code = 1. Running the cmd file on the cluster the backup works

Re: ANR2579E/ANR1512E with Return Code = 1

2004-08-10 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Article 1108971 has an article that should prove useful to you: http://www-1.ibm.com/support/entdocview.wss?uid=swg21108971. While this article discusses the problem in the context of PRESCHEDULECMD/POSTSCHEDULECMD, the same principles apply to schedules where the ACTION is COMMAND. Alternatively

Problems with backup scheduler on Netware system

2004-08-10 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Recently, I started having constant problems with the one of my Netware systems backup/scheduler failing constantly. I get some strange errors in the DSMSCHED.LOG file and then a message about the scheduler being stopped ! Why is it stopping ? I updated to the latest, 5.2.3.0 but it still

Re: DISK POOL

2004-08-10 Thread Bill Dourado
.have you tried : q vol stgp=3494pool access=readwrite stat=filling to make sure tapes are available q stg 3494pool f=d

Re: Problems with backup scheduler on Netware system

2004-08-10 Thread Richard Sims
... 08/10/2004 02:12:45 ANS1301E Server detected system error ... Zoltan - Is there an entry in the server Activity Log at this time which may illuminate the cause? Richard Sims

Re: Problems with backup scheduler on Netware system

2004-08-10 Thread Troy Frank
My hunch is that something was changed on that server when the problem started. Usually, if the client's going to give problems, it does it from the get-go. Were any service packs installed, have you tryed installing any to fix the problem? Have you done any maintennance on the drive lately

Re: Problems with backup scheduler on Netware system

2004-08-10 Thread Jim Kirkman
This may be normal. If you have 'managedservices webclient schedule' in your client opt file then the scheduler stops and restarts according to the b/a schedule. I've seen these type of errors with mac files where the TSM client is not happy with the extension type. Can't remember what the fix

Re: Problems with backup scheduler on Netware system

2004-08-10 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
There were problems with the NSS / SYS: volume that required escalation to Novell, but those problems were on a different volume, USER: Troy Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/10/2004 11:23 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL

Re: Problems with backup scheduler on Netware system

2004-08-10 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Nothing new then I already posted. The same errors messages about the files and the summary: 08/10/2004 02:19:57 ANR0403I Session 8941 ended for node SSN1.VCU.EDU (NetWare). 08/10/2004 02:19:57 ANE4952I (Session: 8937, Node: SSN1.VCU.EDU) Total number

Re: AIX5.3 and power5 for pSeries

2004-08-10 Thread Raymond Ramirez
According to an IBM rep that I met yesterday, AIX 5.3 will begin shipping this Friday the 13th (nice date, BTW). TSM 5.2 and others will be supported. We have our TSM server on AIX 5.1 and we will migrate to AIX 5.2 soon. Raymond Ramirez

restore files use only 1 drive on my IBM 3583 library

2004-08-10 Thread Luc Beaudoin
Hi all I'm restoring a lot of files ... is there a way to tell TSM to use more than on drive for the restore .. I have a IBM 3583 with 6 drives thanks Luc

Re: Problems with backup scheduler on Netware system

2004-08-10 Thread Stapleton, Mark
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU I do have these additional errors in the DSMERROR.LOG file: 08/10/2004 02:13:49 (TSAFS.NLM 6.50 334) An internal TSA error has occurred. See error log for details. 08/10/2004 02:13:49 (TSAFS.NLM 6.50

Re: restore files use only 1 drive on my IBM 3583 library

2004-08-10 Thread Curtis Stewart
There are two places to make a change. 1. On the TSM server increase the number of allowable mount points for the client. Use upd node for this. 2. On the TSM client, add the resource parameter to the option file. Set it to how many sessions you want to start. If this restore is coming off disk,

Re: Problems with backup scheduler on Netware system

2004-08-10 Thread Troy Frank
What patch level are you at on that server? Judging by the TSA errors in dsmerror.log, I would try applying sp2 if it doesn't already have it. You could try rerunning the dsmc q tsa command, to re-register the client with the TSA's. You could also try completely removing the client, and

Checked in volumes could not be mounted

2004-08-10 Thread Tomas Nalevajko
Hi all, I'm encountering problems by our client with checked in volumes. Could someone suggest me some actions in this case? Or did someone see similar case before? Many thanks. Case: q libvol gives list of volumes in library. some of them can be used for backup but some of them no. I identified

Re: Problems with backup scheduler on Netware system

2004-08-10 Thread Jin Bae Chi
What version of NW are you running? We have problems with some of NW 6.5, not being able to even start the scheduler and client, TSM client 5.2.2, server 5.2.2. It doesn't log anything neither on TSM server or client. TSM client 5.2.3 doesn't seem to have any fix for this problem. Gus

Re: Checked in volumes could not be mounted

2004-08-10 Thread Tomas Nalevajko
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Tomas Nalevajko wrote: Hi all, I'm encountering problems by our client with checked in volumes. Could someone suggest me some actions in this case? Or did someone see similar case before? Many thanks. Case: q libvol gives list of volumes in library. some of them can be

Re: Checked in volumes could not be mounted

2004-08-10 Thread Richard Sims
... Case: q libvol gives list of volumes in library. some of them can be used for backup but some of them no. ... The simple cause could be that the tapes were not internally labeled, which would be done via Label Libvolume or dsmlabel operation outside of TSM. (If you get pre-labeled tapes

Re: Checked in volumes could not be mounted

2004-08-10 Thread Tomas Nalevajko
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Richard Sims wrote: ... Case: q libvol gives list of volumes in library. some of them can be used for backup but some of them no. ... The simple cause could be that the tapes were not internally labeled, which would be done via Label Libvolume or dsmlabel operation

Re: Problems with backup scheduler on Netware system

2004-08-10 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Looks to be NW6 SP4 Jin Bae Chi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/10/2004 12:06 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: Problems with backup scheduler on Netware system What version of NW

Re: Checked in volumes could not be mounted

2004-08-10 Thread Tomas Nalevajko
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Ted Byrne wrote: At 12:55 PM 8/10/2004, you wrote: Anyway 'label libvol libname search=yes labels=b checkin=scratch' says 0 volumes labeled, 0 volumes checked in. Well label libvolume will not process tapes that are already checked into the library, which, if I

Re: Checked in volumes could not be mounted

2004-08-10 Thread Ted Byrne
if you've read my previous posts, I've written that I'm checking in volumes with checklabel=barcode that means all volumes are barcoded and I think that also means there is nothing to label. Or am I wrong? The cartridges may well have barcode labels affixed to the outside; that does not guarantee

quarantined files

2004-08-10 Thread John Bremer
All, When a file is quarantined in Symantec AntiVirus, does that prevent TSM from getting access to and backing up that file? Thanks. John

Re: quarantined files

2004-08-10 Thread Rick Harderwijk
That would depend on the security context that TSM is running in, I would presume. Rick -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Bremer Sent: dinsdag 10 augustus 2004 19:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: quarantined files All, When a

Re: Tape Drive Compression over TSM Compression

2004-08-10 Thread Richard Rhodes
At one point in the evolution of out TSM servers we tried to have separate tape drives set up for compression and no compression. We quickly abandoned this. We have a real mixture of data that is partly already compressed on the client (oracle backups) and data that isn't compressed already, as

3590H1A Upgrade Question

2004-08-10 Thread Kamp, Bruce
I just upgraded my 3590 drives from E1A to H1A. When I look at the drives in TSM they still say for read write formats 3590E-C,3590E-B. Shouldn't it say 3590H? I'm on TSM 5.2.1.2 on AIX 5.1 with ATAPE 8.4.1.0 Thanks, - Bruce Kamp Senior

Re: Tape Drive Compression over TSM Compression

2004-08-10 Thread Paul Zarnowski
At 02:08 PM 8/9/2004, Bruno Melo - Suporte Informática wrote: what are the implications on doing this? I saw on the Redbooks that this is not recommended! From empirical analysis, DLT7000 drives do not automatically detect that compressing data is actually expanding it. We opted to not use drive

Re: 3590H1A Upgrade Question

2004-08-10 Thread James, Phil
They should say: Read Formats 3590H-C,3590H-B, Write Formats 3590H-C,3590H-B Have you deleted the drives in TSM and redefined them. Software Services Unit Information Technology Services Division / Data Center California Public Employees' Retirement System Phone: (916) 326-3715 Fax: (916)

Changing fileserver directory structure and TSM

2004-08-10 Thread Gordon Woodward
We are currently looking at making a slight change to the directory structure on our main fileserver (win2000), primarly moving all our workgroup directories to the root of the drive they are on (removal of two redundant parent folders). I can probably already guess what the answer will be but

Re: Agent for Oracle on Windows?

2004-08-10 Thread Fred Johanson
One more thing to add to the list of things not seen while going thru Passport Advantage. Thanks. Quoting Curtis Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Try this. http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/DPON/SH26-4113- 02/en_US/HTML/anow0005.htm [EMAIL PROTECTED] fred johanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

First questions on 3584

2004-08-10 Thread Fred Johanson
Last week, my new 3584 was installed, which is to be the dedicated library for a closed TSM system running on a P615 with the latest version of AIX, Atape, and TSM 5.2.2.5. As of Friday afternoon, AIX could mount a tape, via tapeutil. But as of 5 this afternoon, TSM will not talk to the library.

Re: Changing fileserver directory structure and TSM

2004-08-10 Thread Stapleton, Mark
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon Woodward We are currently looking at making a slight change to the directory structure on our main fileserver (win2000), primarly moving all our workgroup directories to the root of the drive they are on (removal of

filespace name

2004-08-10 Thread Pan, Sanjoy
Hello all, Any idea about how can I get/restore the actual filespace names from ... tsm: TSM2.JPTKYO6q files WEBTRENDS1 Node Name Filespace FSIDPlatform Filespace Is Filespace Name Type Unicode ---